COG Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines Guidelines Children’S Oncology Group
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Role of Combined Therapy in the Treatment of Retinopathy and Optic Neuropathy Due to Radiotherapy in the Uveal Melanoma
Published online: 2020-01-16 THIEME Original Article 1 The Role of Combined Therapy in the Treatment of Retinopathy and Optic Neuropathy Due to Radiotherapy in the Uveal Melanoma Yasemin Benderli Cihan1 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Kayseri Education and Address for correspondence Yasemin Benderli Cihan, MD, Department Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey of Radiation Oncology, Kayseri Education and Research Hospital, Sanayi District, Ataturk Boulevard, Hastane Street, No 78, 38010 Kocasinan, Kayseri, Turkey (e-mail: [email protected]). Asian J Oncol 2020;6:1–2 Abstract Introduction Uveal melanoma has a relatively low incidence. Transpupillary thermo- therapy (TTT), hypofractioned stereotactic radiotherapy (RT), stereotactic radiosur- gery, plaque brachytherapy, charged particle radiation therapy, local tumor resection, enucleation, and exantation are applied in the treatment. Methods The importance given to radiotherapy has increased to get more satisfac- tory results while treating the patient. However, it is the treatment of radiation reti- nopathy and optic neuropathy from complications. Results Radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy are the most important compli- Keywords cations related to radiotherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma. In recent years, ► uveal melanoma many studies have been performed on the treatment of radiation retinopathy and ► radiotherapy optic neuropathy. ► retinopathy Conclusion The consecutive use of triamcinolone in combination with anti-VEGF ► optic neuropathy supports that it may be a future therapeutic agent in the treatment of complications. Introduction was found to be 81.6%.2 The 2-, 5-, and 10-year metastasis rates were reported to be 10%, 25%, and 34%, respectively, regardless Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular of tumor size.3 tumor in adults. -
Case Report Comment
Sir, Visual preservation 18 years after cobalt plaque treatment of choroidal melanoma Brachytherapy using a radioactive plaque is a common method of treating choroidal melanoma today.l Vision can often be retained following brachytherapy for peripheral melanomas, but most patients lose considerable vision when the tumour is located in the macular region.2 We report a case of choroidal melanoma with a margin within 3 mm from the foveola in which the patient retained excellent vision 18 years after treatment with a cobalt-60 plaque. Case report Fig. 2. Wide-angle fundus photograph showing the tumour. The In March 1980, a 51-year-old man was referred for a retinal detachment is not easily visualised in the photograph. choroidal melanoma. His visual acuity was 20/20 in each eye and intraocular pressures were normal. In his ultrasonography. There was a distinct margin between right eye was a dome-shaped, pigmented choroidal the irradiated tumour and the normal foveal area mass (Figs. 1-3) 12 X 11 mm basally and 6 mm in (Fig. 6). For 18 years the vision has remained 20/20 and thickness as measured by estimation and there is no tumour recurrence or radiation retinopathy ultrasonography (Fig. 4). The posterior margin of the (Figs. 5, 6). tumour was 3 mm temporal to the foveola (Fig. 3). The patient elected treatment with a radioactive plaque, which was done by our standard technique. 1 A Comment dose of 35 000 cGy was delivered to the tumour base and macular area and 10 000 cGy to the tumour apex. Six When a melanoma is in the macular area (tumour months after treatment the tumour was 2 mm in margin within 3 mm of the foveola) most patients thickness by ultrasonography and 1 year later it was treated with plaque or charged particle radiotherapy entirely flat on ophthalmoscopy (Fig. -
Late Effects of Therapy in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Survivors REVIEW
REVIEW DOI: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2018.2018.0150 Turk J Hematol 2019;36:1-11 Late Effects of Therapy in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Survivors Çocukluk Çağı Akut Lenfoblastik Lösemi Tedavisi Sonrası Geç Yan Etkiler Hande Kızılocak1, Fatih Okcu2 1Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey 2Texas Children’s Hematology and Oncology Centers, Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Houston, TX, USA Abstract Öz Over the last 50 years, the survival rates in children with acute Son 50 yıldaki gelişmeler ile akut lenfoblastik lösemili (ALL) lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have increased remarkably. The optimal çocuklardaki tedavi sonrası sağkalım oranında belirgin derecede artış use of antileukemic agents in cooperative group protocols, central saptandı. Antilösemik ilaçların akılcı kullanımı, santral sinir sistemini nervous system-directed treatment, improvements in supportive hedefleyen lokal tedaviler ve destek tedavisindeki gelişmeler ile 5 care, and recognition of biological, clinical, and treatment response yıllık olaysız sağkalım %85’e ve 5 yıllık genel sağkalım %90’a ulaştı. characteristics that predict patients with a higher or a lower risk of Uzamış sağkalım süreleri, tedavinin uzun dönem yan etkilerine olan treatment failure have improved 5-year event-free survival rates, farkındalığı da arttırdı. Geç dönem mortalite, ikincil maligniteler, reaching more than 85%, and 5-year overall survival rates, reaching -
Diagnosis, and Treatment of Retinoblastoma
British3'ournal ofOphthalmology 1993; 77: 805-812 805 PERSPECTIVE Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.77.12.805 on 1 December 1993. Downloaded from Applications ofmonoclonal antibodies in the investigation, diagnosis, and treatment of retinoblastoma John F Tarlton, D L Easty In Europe and North America, retinoblastoma has a reported derived cell lines fused with RB1 competent cells.2' Reversal incidence ranging from 1 in 14 000 to 1 in 36 000 live births'-5 of malignancy has also been reported in cell lines transfected and is the most common ocular malignancy affecting children with functional BR1 gene constructs. Recently, however, and infants. Early diagnosis allows the application of a these results have been challenged by other researchers who number of therapies directed at localised disease, including have found incomplete reversal of malignancy in retino- external beam and plaque radiotherapy, cryotherapy, and blastoma cell lines,22 although such effects may be artefacts photocoagulation, although the principal treatment account- resulting from additional genetic changes having occurred in ing for the high cure rate ofaround 90% is enucleation, which cells adapting to tissue culture environments. The impor- is still carried out in over halfofall cases. The justification for tance of RB1 in malignant transformation has also been such radical therapy is the poor prognosis once the tumour demonstrated by inactivating its product by association with escapes the eye, and the high mortality from metastases.6 virus proteins such as adenovirus EIA,23 SV40 large T In the developing countries ofAfrica and Asia the picture is antigen24 and papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein,2" both by different. -
Radiotherapy of Conjunctival Melanoma: Role and Challenges of Brachytherapy, Photon-Beam and Protontherapy
applied sciences Review Radiotherapy of Conjunctival Melanoma: Role and Challenges of Brachytherapy, Photon-Beam and Protontherapy Corrado Spatola 1,2, Rocco Luca Emanuele Liardo 2, Roberto Milazzotto 2 , Luigi Raffaele 2, Vincenzo Salamone 2, Antonio Basile 1,2, Pietro Valerio Foti 1,2, Stefano Palmucci 1,2 , Giuseppe Antonio Pablo Cirrone 3, Giacomo Cuttone 3, Andrea Russo 4 , Teresio Avitabile 4, Michele Reibaldi 5 , Antonio Longo 4, Giuseppe Broggi 1 , Vincenza Bonfiglio 6, Rosario Caltabiano 1 , Stefano Pergolizzi 7 and Floriana Arena 7,* 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate “G.F. Ingrassia”, Università di Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (C.S.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (P.V.F.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (R.C.) 2 UO Radiodiagnostica e Radioterapia Oncologica AOU Policlinico-S.Marco Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (R.L.E.L.); [email protected] (R.M.); raff[email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (V.S.) 3 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare-LNS Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (G.A.P.C.); [email protected] (G.C.) 4 Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Università di Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (T.A.); [email protected] (A.L.) 5 Dipartimento di Oftalmologia, Università di Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy; [email protected] 6 Dipartimento -
Radiation Therapy Coding
Ed 21:01 Radiation March 2021 Missouri Cancer Registry and Research Center Therapy 2021 Show-Me-Tips Coding...Abstracting...Education… Radiation Therapy Coding Radiation Delivery Systems/Approaches and Coding LINEAR ACCELERATOR - Linac If the radiation treatment summary refers to beam energies, such as: • 6X or 6MV, 10X or 10MV • 12X or 12MV, 15X or 15MV Then the treatment modality will always be 02, external beam, photons (a Linac was used to deliver the EBRT treatment) If radiation treatment summary refers to treatment delivery as: • E, eboost, MeV or “en face” Code the treatment modality 04, external beam, electrons (a Linac can also deliver electron therapy) IORT Delivery Technology & Coding IORT FOR BREAST CANCER, Volume: 41 - Partial Breast. Lymph Nodes are not Targeted! Equipment RT Delivery Modality Planning Comments Method Technique Zeiss Intrabeam 50 kVp Linac 02-Photons 02: Low energy x-ray/ Isotope-free. No photon therapy radioactive source used XOFT Axxent 50 kVp Linac 02-Photons 02: Low energy x-ray/ Isotope-free. No photon therapy radioactive source used LIAC 10/12 by Electron 04-Electrons In most cases, Max energy: 10 MeV, Sordina IORT accelerator 04-3D conformal 12 MeV NOVAC by Electron 04-Electrons In most cases, Check with Rad Onc for Sordina IORT accelerator 04-3D conformal planning technique Mobetron Electron 04-Electrons In most cases, Energies: 6, 9, 12 MeV accelerator 04-3D conformal Strut Assisted Ir-192 Sources 09-Brachy, 88 - NA Accelerated partial breast Volume (HDR) Intracavitary HDR irradiation (PBI) Implant -
Late Effects of Treatment
Late Effects of Treatment A Guide for Patients Introduction Your cancer treatment can cause side effects. Some of these will occur at the time of treatment and will normally stop when treatment ends. Some of these side effects may last for a long time after treatment; these are long- term effects. Some side effects do not occur for months or even years after treatment ends; these side effects are called late effects. These late effects can be physical or emotional. Not everyone gets late effects, the risk depends on the type of treatment, the dose of treatment and the patient’s age at the time of treatment. This booklet is designed to and peer reviewed by Dr Panos provide you with information Kottaridis, Royal Free Hospital. about the late effects you may The rewrite was put together by experience, what to expect and Lisa Lovelidge and reviewed by how they may be managed. If Dr Victoria Grandage. We are also you need specific advice or are grateful to our patient reviewers, concerned about a particular Simon Walker, John Watson and late effect, please contact your Steve Colbourne and the Brighton medical team or Clinical Nurse support group. The booklet has Specialist. since been updated by our Patient Information Writer, Isabelle Leach. This booklet has been compiled by Dr Victoria Grandage (UCLH) If you would like any information on the sources used for this booklet, please email [email protected] for a list of references. Version 3 Printed: 10/2020 2 www.leukaemiacare.org.uk Review date: 10/2022 In this booklet Introduction -
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0156881 A1 Stokes (43) Pub
US 20090156881A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0156881 A1 Stokes (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 18, 2009 (54) CONVERGENT WELL IRRADIATING Publication Classification PLAOUE FOR CHOROIDAL MELANOMA (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventor: John P. Stokes, San Antonio, TX A6M 36/12 (2006.01) (US) A6DF 9/00 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. ............................................................ 6OOf7 Correspondence Address: MEYERTONS, HOOD, KIVLIN, KOWERT & (57) ABSTRACT GOETZEL, P.C. Provided in some embodiments is a device suitable for treat P.O. BOX 398 ing an eye that includes a housing and a plurality offins. The AUSTIN, TX 78767-0398 (US) housing includes a base and a rim coupled to the perimeter of the base. The base and the rim at least partially define a cavity (21) Appl. No.: 12/252,136 in the housing, and the cavity is configured to accept one or more radiation seeds. The plurality of fins at least partially (22) Filed: Oct. 15, 2008 reside within or proximate the cavity of the housing. At least a portion of the fins are configured such that radiation emitted Related U.S. Application Data from one or more radiation seeds positioned in the cavity is (60) Provisional application No. 60/980,079, filed on Oct. substantially directed toward a center portion of the eye dur 15, 2007. ing use. SClera ChOroid Patent Application Publication Jun. 18, 2009 Sheet 1 of 8 US 2009/O156881 A1 C-H > O wis w CN Sa CNwas O C v N. l e CD VN sU O S & U wal w- F S S wis,N ws Patent Application Publication Jun. -
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2016
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2016 Narrative changes appear in bold text Items underlined have been moved within the guidelines since the FY 2014 version Italics are used to indicate revisions to heading changes The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), two departments within the U.S. Federal Government’s Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) provide the following guidelines for coding and reporting using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM). These guidelines should be used as a companion document to the official version of the ICD-10- CM as published on the NCHS website. The ICD-10-CM is a morbidity classification published by the United States for classifying diagnoses and reason for visits in all health care settings. The ICD-10-CM is based on the ICD-10, the statistical classification of disease published by the World Health Organization (WHO). These guidelines have been approved by the four organizations that make up the Cooperating Parties for the ICD-10-CM: the American Hospital Association (AHA), the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), CMS, and NCHS. These guidelines are a set of rules that have been developed to accompany and complement the official conventions and instructions provided within the ICD-10-CM itself. The instructions and conventions of the classification take precedence over guidelines. These guidelines are based on the coding and sequencing instructions in the Tabular List and Alphabetic Index of ICD-10-CM, but provide additional instruction. -
Comparison of Retinoblastoma Reduction for Chemotherapy Vs External Beam Radiotherapy
CLINICAL SCIENCES Comparison of Retinoblastoma Reduction for Chemotherapy vs External Beam Radiotherapy Daniel A. Sussman, MD; Erika Escalona-Benz, MD; Matthew S. Benz, MD; Brandy C. Hayden, BS; William Feuer, MS; Nicole Cicciarelli; Stuart Toledano, MD; Arnold Markoe, MD; Timothy G. Murray, MD Objective: To determine the time course and extent of Results: Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients were evaluated tumor reduction associated with systemic chemo- for tumor response; 18 patients were treated with sys- therapy or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the treat- temic chemotherapy and 8 patients were treated with ment of advanced intraocular retinoblastoma. EBRT. Median follow-up was 36 months. A mean 68% reduction in tumor volume occurred after 1 cycle of che- Methods: Retrospective review of children with Reese- motherapy compared with a 12% reduction at a similar Ellsworth stages IV and V retinoblastoma undergoing pri- time point (1 month) after initiation of EBRT (PϽ.004). mary globe-conserving therapy with either systemic che- There was no statistically significant difference in tu- moreduction or EBRT. Study variables were recorded at mor volume reduction between treatment modalities at baseline, at monthly intervals for the first 6 months, and the 12-month follow-up visit. Both systemic chemore- at 12 months after the initiation of treatment. Tumor vol- duction and EBRT achieved 100% globe conservation and umes were calculated using basal area and height values 100% patient survival in this series. determined by ultrasonography, physical examination, and fundus photographic review. Conclusions: Retinoblastoma reduction exhibits a dif- ferential time course based on the applied primary treat- Main Outcome Measures: Outcome measures in- ment. -
PATIENTS • Guide • Heal
Final Program ASTRO 55TH ANNUAL MEETING Meeting Dates: September 22-25, 2013 • Exhibit Dates: September 22-24, 2013 • Georgia World Congress Center • Atlanta HopePATIENTS • Guide • Heal Download ASTROmobile - The offi cial meeting app. See 17 page for details. ANNUAL MEETING SCIENCE BASED, PATIENT DRIVEN www.astro.org/annualmeeting #ASTRO13 ROOM SERVICE NOW AVAILABLE Medical centers that never considered proton therapy accessible are now installing single-room configurations of the MEVION S250™ system. Thanks to a radically smaller footprint, lower capital outlay, reduced operating costs, and complete system integration, advanced proton therapy is now available at the press of a button. ™ Welcome to the world of High Energy Cancer Care ... for everyone. Visit us at ASTRO 2013 Booth #1253 mevion.com LAD130401 Final Program ASTRO 55TH ANNUAL MEETING Meeting Dates: September 22-25, 2013 • Exhibit Dates: September 22-24, 2013 • Georgia World Congress Center • Atlanta HopePATIENTS • Guide • Heal Download ASTROmobile - The offi cial meeting app. See 17 page for details. HELD IN CONJUNCTION WITH: AMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS (ASRT) ANNUAL MEETING ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY (ARRO) SCIENCE BASED, PATIENT DRIVEN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY ADMINISTRATORS (SROA) www.astro.org/annualmeeting #ASTRO13 Welcome TO THE 55TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY “Patients: Hope, Guide, Heal” Dear Colleagues, On behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, I would like to welcome you to ASTRO’s 55th Annual Meeting. We have developed an exciting program that will provide many opportunities for exchanging scientifi c information as well as professional networking. The theme this year is “Patients: Hope, Guide, Heal.” Given all of the changes we are facing in health care, I feel that it is extremely important to keep our focus on our patients and the best care we can provide them. -
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2018 (October 1, 2017 - September 30, 2018)
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2018 (October 1, 2017 - September 30, 2018) Narrative changes appear in bold text Items underlined have been moved within the guidelines since the FY 2017 version Italics are used to indicate revisions to heading changes The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), two departments within the U.S. Federal Government’s Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) provide the following guidelines for coding and reporting using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM). These guidelines should be used as a companion document to the official version of the ICD-10- CM as published on the NCHS website. The ICD-10-CM is a morbidity classification published by the United States for classifying diagnoses and reason for visits in all health care settings. The ICD-10-CM is based on the ICD-10, the statistical classification of disease published by the World Health Organization (WHO). These guidelines have been approved by the four organizations that make up the Cooperating Parties for the ICD-10-CM: the American Hospital Association (AHA), the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), CMS, and NCHS. These guidelines are a set of rules that have been developed to accompany and complement the official conventions and instructions provided within the ICD-10-CM itself. The instructions and conventions of the classification take precedence over guidelines. These guidelines are based on the coding and sequencing instructions in the Tabular List and Alphabetic Index of ICD-10-CM, but provide additional instruction.