DOCSLIB.ORG

Log of Bridges on State Highways

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Log of Bridges on State Highways October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS i October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS California Log of Bridges on State Highways Contents Bridge List Items and Keys to Coded Information...................................................ii County Table................................................................................................................v Alphabetic City Code Table.......................................................................................vi District Log..................................................................................................................1 Index of Bridge Numbers...........................................................................................I1 Prepared by California Department of Transportation Structure Maintenance & Investigations The information in this publication is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/brlog2.htm ii LO G OF BR IDGE S ON STA TE HIG HW A YSOctober, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYSOctober, BRIDGE LIST ITEMS AND KEYS TO CODED INFORMATION Postmile Entries in BOLD type show DISTRICT-COUNTY-ROUTE. Other entries show postmile prefix followed by postmile to the nearest hundredth of a mile. Prefixes of R, M, and N refer to re-aligned routes. Prefix L refers to a section or route paralleling another route. When the route is on the deck of the bridge, the postmile is recorded at the beginning of the structure (i.e. the lowest postmile on the bridge). When the route goes under the structure, the postmile is recorded on the underpassing route where the structure is first encountered. All other measuerments in this publication are given in meters. Bridge Number The official structure number assigned by CalTrans. The Bridge Number Suffix carries information about the function of the structure. Blank Structure carrying two-way traffic C Center structure E Connector structure F Connector structure G Connector structure H Connector structure J Outer outer left K Left outer highway structure L Left structure of left inner structure M Burried Hazard or miscellaneous structure R Right structure or right inner structure S Right outer highway structure T Outer outer right W Drainage pumping plant Y Structure on State-owned and maintained connections no on main highway (may be closed) Z Access to private property or closed with no access OU "O" Indicates that the route is carried on the deck of the structure "U" Indicates a route crossing under the structure. O - Structure Name U - Roadway Under or Route Information When route traffic is on (O) the structure, the structure name is shown. When route traffic is under (U) the structure, the roadway name is shown, otherwise, miscellaneous route information is shown. iii October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS Structure Types Code for main span type followed by approach span type (if different). First character (Material): Second & Third characters (Design): 1 = Concrete 01 = Slab 2 = Concrete continuous 02 = Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder 3 = Steel 03 = Girder and Floorbeam System 4 = Steel continuous 04 = Tee Beam 5 = Prestressed concrete 05 = Box Beam or Girders - Multiple 6 = Prestressed concrete continuous 06 = Box Beam or Girders - Single or Spread 7 = Wood or timber 07 = Frame (except frame culverts) 8 = Masonry 08 = Orthotropic 9 = Aluminum, wrought iron, or cast iron 09 = Truss - Deck 0 = Other 10 = Truss - Thru 11 = Arch - Deck 12 = Arch - Thru 13 = Suspension 14 = Stayed Girder 15 = Movable - Lift 16 = Movable - Bascule 17 = Movable - Swing 18 = Tunnel 19 = Culvert 21 = Segmental Box Girder 22 = Channel Beam 00 = Other City CalTrans alphabetic code for the city or government land within whose limits the bridge exists. The Alphabetic City Codes Table shows the full city names corresponding to these codes. Where a name is preceeded by an asterisk, it indicates a bridge on government lands not within any city limits. Bridge Length The length of the structure from paving notch to paving notch in meters. Width The out-to-out width of the structure to the nearest tenth of a meter. For through structures, the lateral clearance between superstructure members. For flared structures, the minimum deck width. No width is shown for non-grade-top culverts or structures not carrying vehicular traffic, such as underpasses or pedestrian overcrossings. Number of Spans The number of span in the structure. Upper-level spans of double deck structures are not included in this count. Min VC Over Roadway The minimum vertical clearance over the traveled way portion of the ROUTE in meters. In the case of arches, tunnels, through trusses, etc, where the minimum clearance does not give a true picture, an asterisk ("*") is shown after the clearance. In such cases, an accurate depiction of the available vertical clearance may be obtained from the structure clearance diagram which resides within the office of Structure Maintenance and Investigations. Sidewalk Widths The minimum width of left and right sidewalks or curbs, to the nearest tenth of a meter. Where this value is 1 meter or greater, the structure is considered to carry pedestrian traffic. iv October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS Year Built (Original Construction) and Year Widened or Extended The year of original construction. For some older bridges, this may be an estimate. Permit Rating Permit ratings are shown for information only. They should not be used for permit issuance. The permit rating is usually a string of five characters showing permit capacity for 5,7,9,11, and 13 axle vehicles. Where a single character is shown, it represents an "administrative" rating. P Purple permit capacity G Green permit capacity O Orange permit capcity X No permit capacity Permit rating are for information only. They are not to be used for permit issuance. P (Posting) Posting - B Open - posting recommended D Open under temporary conditions E Open - temporary structure G New structure - not yet open K Closed to all traffic M Closed or partially closed pending repairs J Posted for load v October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS COUNTY NAMES, NUMBERS AND ABBREVIATION County No. Abbr. County No. Abbr. Alameda 33 ALA Del Norte 1 DN Alpine 31 ALP Siskiyou 2 SIS Amador 26 AMA Modoc 3 MOD Butte 12 BUT Humboldt 4 HUM Calaveras 30 CAL Trinity 5 TRI Colusa 15 COL Shasta 6 SHA Contra Costa 28 CC Lassen 7 LAS Del Norte 1 DN Tehama 8 TEH El Dorado 25 ED Plumas 9 PLU Fresno 42 FRE Mendocino 10 MEN Glenn 11 GLE Glenn 11 GLE Humboldt 4 HUM Butte 12 BUT Imperial 58 IMP Sierra 13 SIE Inyo 48 INY Lake 14 LAK Kern 50 KER Colusa 15 COL Kings 45 KIN Yuba 16 YUB Lake 14 LAK Nevada 17 NEV Lassen 7 LAS Sutter 18 SUT Los Angeles 53 LA Placer 19 PLA Madera 41 MAD Sonoma 20 SON Marin 27 MRN Napa 21 NAP Mariposa 40 MPA Yolo 22 YOL Mendocino 10 MEN Solano 23 SOL Merced 39 MER Sacramento 24 SAC Modoc 3 MOD El Dorado 25 ED Mono 47 MNO Amador 26 AMA Monterey 44 MON Marin 27 MRN Napa 21 NAP Contra Costa 28 CC Nevada 17 NEV San Joaquin 29 SJ Orange 55 ORA Calaveras 30 CAL Placer 19 PLA Alpine 31 ALP Plumas 9 PLU Tuolumne 32 TUO Riverside 56 RIV Alameda 33 ALA Sacramento 24 SAC San Francisco 34 SF San Benito 43 SBT San Mateo 35 SM San Bernardino 54 SBD Santa Cruz 36 SCR San Diego 57 SD Santa Clara 37 SCL San Francisco 34 SF Stanislaus 38 STA San Joaquin 29 SJ Merced 39 MER San Luis Obispo 49 SLO Mariposa 40 MPA San Mateo 35 SM Madera 41 MAD Santa Barbara 51 SB Fresno 42 FRE Santa Clara 37 SCL San Benito 43 SBT Santa Cruz 36 SCR Monterey 44 MON Shasta 6 SHA Kings 45 KIN Sierra 13 SIE Tulare 46 TUL Siskiyou 2 SIS Mono 47 MNO Solano 23 SOL Inyo 48 INY Sonoma 20 SON San Luis Obispo 49 SLO Stanislaus 38 STA Kern 50 KER Sutter 18 SUT Santa Barbara 51 SB Tehama 8 TEH Ventura 52 VEN Trinity 5 TRI Los Angeles 53 LA Tulare 46 TUL San Bernardino 54 SBD Tuolumne 32 TUO Orange 55 ORA Ventura 52 VEN Riverside 56 RIV Yolo 22 YOL San Diego 57 SD Yuba 16 YUB Imperial 58 IMP vi October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS ALPAHBETIC CITY CODES City Code City City Code City City Code City 0000 00000 BLV BELVEDERE CMAD CORTE MADERA ADA ARCADIA BLY BLYTHE CMB CAMPBELL ADEL ADELANTO BMT BELMONT CML CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA AGRH AGOURA HILLS BMTN BLOOMINGTON CMRC COMMERCE ALA ALAMEDA BONT BONITA CMRL CAMARILLO ALB ALBANY BOST BOSTONIA CMS COSTA MESA ALH ALHAMBRA BPK BUENA PARK CMSA CALIMESA ALMO ALAMO BRB BURBANK CND CONCORD ALT ALTURAS BRE BREA CNG CORNING ALTA ALTADENA BRW BRAWLEY CNLK CANYON LAKE ALV ALISO VIEJO BSBN BRISBANE COA COACHELLA AMA AMADOR CITY BSW BARSTOW COL COLTON AMCN AMERICAN CANYON BTWD BRENTWOOD COM COMPTON ANA ANAHEIM BURE *BUREAU OF RECLAMATION COR CORONA AND ANDERSON BURL BURLINGAME CORD CORONADO ANDP ALONDRA PARK BVHS BEVERLY HILLS COTI COTATI ANG ANGELS BWP BALDWIN PARK COV COVINA ANT ANTIOCH BYWD BAYWOOD-LOS OSOS CPO CUPERTINO APLV APPLE VALLEY CADE CASA DE ORO-MOUNT HELIX CPTL CAPITOLA ARC ARCATA CAEL CARMICHAEL CRC CRESCENT CITY ARDN ARDEN-ARCADE CAL CALABASAS CRCN CORCORAN ARGD ARROYO GRANDE CALC CALIFORNIA CITY CRSN CARSON ART ARTESIA CAMA CAMP PENDLETON SOUTH CRTS CERRITOS ARV ARVIN CAMN CAMP PENDLETON NORTH CSTG CALISTOGA ASHD ASHLAND CAPA CAMERON PARK CTHC CATHEDRAL CITY ATAS ATASCADERO CARP CARPINTERIA CYP CYPRESS ATN ATHERTON CAVA CASTRO VALLEY CYTN CLAYTON ATW ATWATER CBD CARLSBAD DAPT DANA POINT AUB AUBURN CDHY CUDAHY DBA DINUBA AVA AVALON CER CERES DBLN DUBLIN AVDH AVOCADO HEIGHTS CFX COLFAX DHSP DESERT HOT SPRINGS AVNL AVENAL CHC CHICO DLC DALY CITY AZU AZUSA CHLD CHERRYLAND DLMR DEL MAR BAN BANNING CHN CHINO DLN DELANO BAU
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alameda, a Geographical History, by Imelda Merlin
    Alameda A Geographical History by Imelda Merlin Friends of the Alameda Free Library Alameda Museum Alameda, California 1 Copyright, 1977 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 77-73071 Cover picture: Fernside Oaks, Cohen Estate, ca. 1900. 2 FOREWORD My initial purpose in writing this book was to satisfy a partial requirement for a Master’s Degree in Geography from the University of California in Berkeley. But, fortunate is the student who enjoys the subject of his research. This slim volume is essentially the original manuscript, except for minor changes in the interest of greater accuracy, which was approved in 1964 by Drs. James Parsons, Gunther Barth and the late Carl Sauer. That it is being published now, perhaps as a response to a new awareness of and interest in our past, is due to the efforts of the “Friends of the Alameda Free Library” who have made a project of getting my thesis into print. I wish to thank the members of this organization and all others, whose continued interest and perseverance have made this publication possible. Imelda Merlin April, 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge her indebtedness to the many individuals and institutions who gave substantial assistance in assembling much of the material treated in this thesis. Particular thanks are due to Dr. Clarence J. Glacken for suggesting the topic. The writer also greatly appreciates the interest and support rendered by the staff of the Alameda Free Library, especially Mrs. Hendrine Kleinjan, reference librarian, and Mrs. Myrtle Richards, curator of the Alameda Historical Society. The Engineers’ and other departments at the Alameda City Hall supplied valuable maps an information on the historical development of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4- Biological Resources
    SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4- BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the existing sensitive biological resources of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (the Estuary) that could be affected by project-related construction and locally increased levels of boating use, identifies potential impacts to those resources, and recommends mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate those impacts. The Initial Study for this project identified potentially significant impacts on shorebirds and rafting waterbirds, marine mammals (harbor seals), and wetlands habitats and species. The potential for spread of invasive species also was identified as a possible impact. 3.4.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SETTING HABITATS WITHIN AND AROUND SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY The vegetation and wildlife of bayland environments varies among geographic subregions in the bay (Figure 3.4-1), and also with the predominant land uses: urban (commercial, residential, industrial/port), urban/wildland interface, rural, and agricultural. For the purposes of discussion of biological resources, the Estuary is divided into Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, Central San Francisco Bay, and South San Francisco Bay (See Figure 3.4-2). The general landscape structure of the Estuary’s vegetation and habitats within the geographic scope of the WT is described below. URBAN SHORELINES Urban shorelines in the San Francisco Estuary are generally formed by artificial fill and structures armored with revetments, seawalls, rip-rap, pilings, and other structures. Waterways and embayments adjacent to urban shores are often dredged. With some important exceptions, tidal wetland vegetation and habitats adjacent to urban shores are often formed on steep slopes, and are relatively recently formed (historic infilled sediment) in narrow strips.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinolecreeksedimentfinal
    Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment January 2005 Prepared by the San Francisco Estuary Institute for USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and Contra Costa Resource Conservation District San Francisco Estuary Institute The Regional Watershed Program was founded in 1998 to assist local and regional environmental management and the public to understand, characterize and manage environmental resources in the watersheds of the Bay Area. Our intent is to help develop a regional picture of watershed condition and downstream effects through a solid foundation of literature review and peer- review, and the application of a range of science methodologies, empirical data collection and interpretation in watersheds around the Bay Area. Over this time period, the Regional Watershed Program has worked with Bay Area local government bodies, universities, government research organizations, Resource Conservation Districts (RCDs) and local community and environmental groups in the Counties of Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Francisco. We have also fulfilled technical advisory roles for groups doing similar work outside the Bay Area. This report should be referenced as: Pearce, S., McKee, L., and Shonkoff, S., 2005. Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment. A technical report of the Regional Watershed Program, San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), Oakland, California. SFEI Contribution no. 316, 102 pp. ii San Francisco Estuary Institute ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Bridge No. 24-53) Spanning
    PAINTERSVILLE BRIDGE HAER CA-2295 (Bridge No. 24-53) HAER CA-2295 Spanning Sacramento River at California State Highway 160 Courtland vicinity Sacramento County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD PACIFIC WEST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1111 Jackson Street, Suite 700 Oakland, CA 94607 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD PAINTERSVILLE BRIDGE (Bridge No. 24-53) HAER No. CA-2295 Location: Spanning Sacramento River at Post Mile 20.96 of California State Highway 160, less than one mile south of Courtland, Sacramento County, California UTM: 10-624362mE/4242133mN. UTM References were calculated using the North American Datum (NAD) 1983 series of the United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.), which is the California State Standard. Present Owner: California Department of Transportation 1120 N St. Sacramento, CA 95814 Present Use: Highway Bridge Significance: The Paintersville Bridge is one of the very few unmodified examples in California of the Strauss Heel Trunnion Bascule Bridge, one of the most important patented bascules. It was also a link in the Victory Highway, a transcontinental highway, and played an integral part in transportation and agricultural history in the California Delta region. Report Prepared By: Margo Nayyar, Research Associate, Tory Swim, Research Associate, and Gloria Scott, Built Environment Preservation Services Branch Chief, Cultural Studies Office, Division of Environmental Analysis, California Department of Transportation Project Information: The control house on Paintersville Bridge was removed and replaced in 2007 as part of a project to correct various safety deficiencies, install state- of-the-art electrical control equipment to operate the movable spans, and to bring the bridge up to current health and safety codes for decent, safe and sanitary structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 40 Old Time Sunday Drive Rocklin To
    for a redo, train depot in auburn is not gold Emerging from the underpass on El Dorado, turn left at Turn right at the next signal. Continue to the Clipper Colfax is named after the 17th vice president of the Stay on Rollins Lake Rd. unless you’d like a side trip contry museum the signal and continue on Lincoln Way. Gap/Placer Hills overpass/exit (exit 125). (38 58.227 United States, Schuyler Colfax. There’s a statue in the along the even older Victory highway route, the Norton Highway 40 Old Time Sunday Drive 121 01.150). At the intersection with Placer Hills Rd., plaza by the historical society. Enjoy historic downtown Grade Rd. (39 07.263 120 56.835). and pacer co. courthouse was built Stay on Lincoln Way past the Foresthill Rd. intersection cross the freeway to Applegate Rd. and go left. You will Colfax where you will find shops, restaurants, and the Rocklin to Donner Pass and Truckee - Skip the Freeway. (the signal) and I-80 overpass [2.4 miles from the court- be passing Lake Theodore. You are on the south side of Colfax Historical Society/museum in the current train This is a scenic but curvy 3.8 miles and will bring you in 1898 dedication 7/4 to replacce house]. Here there are fast food restaurants, gas stations, the freeway. station (39 06.307 120 57.002) across the street from back to Old 40 at the Magra Rd. I-80 exit. “built in early 1900’s” a supermarket, and stores. the historic Colfax Hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Hazards Incorporates the State-Mandated “Safety” and “Noise” Elements of the General Plan
    7 HAZARDS ENVIRONMENTAL A. OVERVIEW Environmental Hazards incorporates the state-mandated “Safety” and “Noise” elements of the General Plan. The Chapter addresses natural and man-made hazards in the City, including earthquakes, landslides, floods, sea level rise, wildfire, air and water pollution, hazardous materials, and aviation accidents. It includes a summary of emergency preparedness in San Leandro, with policies that provide the foundation for disaster planning in the City. The Element also addresses noise issues, with the dual objective of mitigating existing noise problems and avoiding future disturbances and conflicts. The overall purpose of this Element is to minimize the potential for damage and injury resulting from environmental hazards. The State Government Code requires that the Element identify and evaluate the hazards that are present and establish appropriate goals, policies, and action programs to reduce those hazards to acceptable levels. Environmental hazards define basic constraints to land use that must be reflected in how and where development takes place. Public education is critical to the successful implementation of this Element. Although San Leandrans are generally aware that the City is located in “earthquake country,” there is still much that can be done to improve readiness and response when disaster strikes. The Environmental Hazards Element takes a pro-active approach to emergency preparedness, emphasizing mitigation and reduced exposure to hazards as well as response and recovery. This Element is closely coordinated with the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), a federally mandated plan to reduce exposure to hazards and ensure eligibility for federal disaster preparedness and relief funds. 7-1 SAN LEANDRO GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD S The Element also sets forth a pro-active strategy for addressing noise issues in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit Ohio's Historic Bridges
    SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION Visit Ohio’s Historic Bridges Historic and unique bridges have a way of sticking in our collective memories. Many of us remember the bridge we crossed walking to school, a landmark on the way to visit relatives, the gateway out of town or a welcoming indication that you are back in familiar territory. The Ohio Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ohio Historic Bridge Association, Ohio History Connection’s State Historic Preservation Office, TourismOhio and historicbridges.org, has assembled a list of stunning bridges across the state that are well worth a journey. Ohio has over 500 National Register-listed and historic bridges, including over 150 wooden covered bridges. The following map features iron, steel and concrete struc- tures, and even a stone bridge built when canals were still helping to grow Ohio’s economy. Some were built for transporting grain to market. Other bridges were specifically designed to blend into the scenic landscape of a state or municipal park. Many of these featured bridges are Ohio Historic Bridge Award recipients. The annual award is given to bridge owners and engineers that rehabilitate, preserve or reuse historic structures. The awards are sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration, ODOT and Ohio History Connection’s State Historic Preservation Office. Anthony Wayne Bridge - Toledo, OH Ohio Department of Transportation SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION 2 17 18 SOUTHEAST REGION in eastern Ohio, Columbiana County has Metropark’s Huntington Reservation on the community. A project that will rehabilitate several rehabilitated 1880’s through truss shore of Lake Erie along US 6/Park Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sonoma County Stormwater Resources Plan Evaluation Process
    Appendix A List of Stakeholders Engaged APPENDIX A List of Stakeholders Engaged Specific audiences engaged in the planning process are identified below. These audiences include: cities, government officials, landowners, public land managers, locally regulated commercial, agricultural and industrial stakeholders, non-governmental organizations, mosquito and vector control districts and the general public. TABLE 1 LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGED Organization Type Watershed 1st District Supervisor Government Sonoma 5th District Supervisor Government Petaluma City of Petaluma Government Petaluma City of Sonoma Government Sonoma Daily Acts Non-Governmental Petaluma Friends of the Petaluma River Non-Governmental Petaluma Zone 2A Petaluma River Watershed- Flood Control Government Petaluma Advisory Committee Zone 3A Valley of the Moon - Flood Control Advisory Government Sonoma Committee Marin Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Special District Both Sonoma Ecology Center Non-Governmental Sonoma Sonoma County Regional Parks Government Both Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Government Both Space District Sonoma Land Trust Non-Governmental Both Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works Government Both Valley of the Moon Water District Government Sonoma Sonoma Resource Conservation District Special District Both Sonoma County Permit Sonoma Government Both Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Non-Governmental N/A California State Parks Government Both California State Water Resources Control Board Government N/A Southern Sonoma
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]