OS PDF Version
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fact Sheet: Benefits of Hawaii's Tourism Economy
Fact Sheet: Benefits of Hawai‘i’s Tourism Economy Hawai‘i Tourism Industry in 20191 Tourism is the largest single source of private capital for Hawai‘i’s economy. In 2019, Hawai‘i’s tourism economy has recorded. Visitor Spending: $17.75 billion (+1.4%, +$244.4 million YOY versus 20182). Statewide: $48.6 million in average visitor spending daily: • O‘ahu: $22.4 million per day • Maui: $14.0 million per day • Island of Hawai‘i: $6.4 million per day • Kaua‘i: $5.2 million per day State Tax Revenue: $2.07 billion (+1.4%,+$28.5 million YOY versus 2018). Visitor Arrivals: 10,424,995 (+5.4% YOY versus 2018). On any given day were 249,000 visitors in the Hawaiian Islands. Jobs supported: 216,000 Air Seats: 13,619,349 (+2.9% YOY versus 2018). Opportunities for Continued Growth Increased arrivals during shoulder periods: April-May and October-November. Renovations, upgrades to Hawai‘i’s tourism product (hotels, attractions, natural resources). Increased distribution of visitors to the neighbor islands. TAT Collections FY 2018 TAT Distribution FY 2019 TAT Distribution ($ millions) ($ millions) Convention Convention Center Enterprise Center Enterprise Special Fund, Special Fund, Tourism $16.5 Tourism Special $26.5 Special Fund, Department of Fund, $82.0 $79.0 Land and Natural Department of Resources, Land and Natural $3.0 Resources, General Fund, $3.0 General Fund, Counties, $103.0 $315.2 Counties, $103.0 $340.0 Turtle Bay Conservation Turtle Bay Easement Conservation Fund, $1.5 Easement Fund, $1.5 Mass Transit Mass Transit Special Fund, Special Fund, $23.6 $57.4 FY 2017: The state collected $508.38 million in transient accommodations tax (TAT=9.25%). -
Oil Shale Economics Existing Analyses Do Not Measure Impacts of Commercial Development Adequately
Oil Shale Economics Existing Analyses Do Not Measure Impacts of Commercial Development Adequately Is oil shale economically viable? Even the federal government does not know. And yet, in making the case for accelerated commercial development of oil shale and tar sands resources in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, President Bush’s Departments of Energy (DOE) and the Interior (DOI) pointed to a range of macroeconomic, socioeconomic, and consumer benefi ts that would result. However, a close review of data and existing studies reveals far diff erent conclusions. What’s at Stake? Environmental quality is a As Colorado’s Governor, Bill Ritt er, has argued, oil shale critical economic force in leasing on top of the “existing network of energy develop- oil shale country and the environmental amenities provid- ment and changing land uses will put more pressure on an ed by public lands are an important economic driver. Areas already fragile ecosystem and public temperament.” proposed for oil shale development overlap with tourism, agriculture, and recreational opportunities. Older workers Th e federal and retirees, who are drawn to the region because of its What’s the Problem? government environment and quality of life, bring with them invest- has a poor understanding of the economic and socio- ment, retirement, and other non-employment income. economic impacts of commercial oil shale development. Despite DOI’s att empt to address the information defi cit What’s at Risk? Water demands for shale through the federal RD&D program, there are inextricable development will come at questions that need to be answered regarding how industrial the expense of local farms and ranches. -
EMD Oil Shale Committee
EMD Oil Shale Committee 2017 EMD Oil Shale Committee Report Justin E. Birdwell (Chair), U.S. Geological Survey November 29, 2017 Vice-Chairs: • Gerald Daub (Vice-Chair: Industry), Daub & Associates, Inc. • Dr. Lauren Birgenheier (Vice-Chair: University), University of Utah • Michael D. Vanden Berg (Vice-Chair: Government), Utah Geological Survey Advisory Group: • Dr. Alan K. Burnham, Stanford University • Dr. Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey, University of Oklahoma • Mr. Ronald C. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey Special Consultants to the Committee: • John Parsons, QER Pty Ltd • Gary Aho, Sage Geotech • Indrek Aarna, Eesti Energia • Rikki Hrenko-Browning, Enefit American Oil • Ryan Clerico, Enefit American Oil • Alex Bocock, Red Leaf Resources • Christopher Hopkins, Canshale Corp. • Steven Kerr, Millcreek Mining Group • Steven Odut, Thyssenkrupp • Pierre Allix, Total S.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Low oil prices continue to hamper oil shale development around the world. Although new production capacity in Estonia and China has come online recently, efforts in other places are on indefinite hiatus or are well behind schedule relative to what was anticipated just a few years ago. The current status remains in flux, and recent developments in conventional and unconventional crude oil plays in the United States and elsewhere indicate this will not change anytime soon. Oil shale continues to be mined processed in China and Brazil, but production updates for 2016 were not available as of the preparation of this report. In Estonia, Eesti Energia (Enefit) continued development of their co-generation Auvere power plant that is designed to utilize both oil shale and other fuel sources (wood chips, peat, gas). -
Qualicum Beach Retail and Tourism Gap and Opportunity Analysis
Qualicum Beach Retail and Tourism Gap and Opportunity Analysis May 2009 Prepared for: Town of Qualicum Beach By: Coriolis Consulting Corp. RETAIL AND TOURISM GAP AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Retail and Service Market Analysis ...................................................................... 2 2.1 Qualicum Beach’s Role in the Regional Retail and Service Market ................. 2 2.2 Trade Area Population Trends and Projections ................................................. 2 2.2.1 Existing Population and Recent Trends ................................................... 2 2.2.2 Population Projections ............................................................................. 4 2.3 Retail and Service Market Conditions in Qualicum Beach ................................ 4 2.3.1 Types of Businesses ............................................................................... 4 2.3.2 Vacancy .................................................................................................. 5 2.3.3 Recent Development ............................................................................... 6 2.3.4 Commercial Character ............................................................................. 6 2.3.5 Demand for Retail and Service Floor Space ............................................ 6 2.4 Economic Viability of Retail Development ........................................................ -
Future Strategies for Promoting Tourism and Petroleum Heritage in Khuzestan Province, Iran
Future strategies for promoting tourism and petroleum heritage in Khuzestan Province, Iran Sahar Amirkhani, Neda Torabi Farsani and Homa Moazzen Jamshidi Abstract Sahar Amirkhani and Purpose – Industrial tourism not only strives to preserve industrial heritage, but can also be a strategy for being Neda Torabi Farsani are both familiar with the history of industry and attracting tourists to new destinations. This paper examines the issue of based at the Department of promoting petroleum industrial tourism in the case of Khuzestan, Iran. The research aims at determining Museum and Tourism, Art appropriate strategies for promoting petroleum industrial tourism. University of Isfahan, – Design/methodology/approach The data were analysed through a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, Isfahan, Iran. and threats (SWOT) model. Homa Moazzen Jamshidi is Findings – The results revealed the competitive strategy as the best. Lastly, strategies such as: concentric based at the Department of diversification, joint venture strategy, conglomerate diversification and horizontal diversification were proposed Economics and Arts as key solutions. The results support the view that establishing an exploratory ecomuseum in the territory of Entrepreneurship, Art Khuzestan Province can be a suitable concentric diversification strategy towards petroleum industrial sustainable tourism in the future. University of Isfahan, Originality/value – The main originality of this paper includes linking tourism with the petroleum (oil and natural Isfahan, Iran. gas) industry -
HISTORY of WESTERN OIL SHALE HISTORY of WESTERN OIL SHALE
/ _... i';C4 - SHELF , Historyof Western Oil Shale Paul L. Russell . " The Center for Professional Advancement Paul Russell received his degree from the University of Arizona. After working for Industry for five years, he began his involvement with oil shale in 1948 when he joined the U.S. Bureau of Mines and was assigned to Rifle, Colorado, to work at Anvil Points. During the middle fifties, he was assigned to the Atomic Energy Com mission to study the extraction of ura nium from the Chattanooga Shales in Tennessee. He became Research Director of the U.S. Bureau ofMines in 1967 and served in this capacity until he retired in 1979. During these years his involvement with oil shale intensified. Currently, he is an engineering consultant. ISBN: 0-86563-000-3 ,._-------_._.. V.D.ALLRED 6016 SOUTH BANNOCK LI7TLETON. COLO. 80120 ....~ ...........~..... This compelling history spans 65 years of western oil shale development from its begin ning to the present day. These were the years in which most of the present-day retorting pro cesses were invented and devel oped,leading to present studies of in-situ retorting, and to the resumption of leasing of fed eral oil shale lands. The many excellent illustra tions and contemporary photo graphs in themselves provide a pictorial record of an era when the United States was "wild over oil"-an era when Gov ernment estimates of billions of barrels of oil in western oil shales were used to advan tage for questionable-if not fraudulent-stock promotions designed to raise capital for development, or to fatten the promoters' pockets. -
Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development
5th Edition Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______________________________________________________________________________ Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development Prepared by INTEK, Inc. For the U.S. Department of Energy • Office of Petroleum Reserves Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Fifth Edition: September 2011 Note to Readers Regarding the Revised Edition (September 2011) This report was originally prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy in June 2007. The report and its contents have since been revised and updated to reflect changes and progress that have occurred in the domestic oil shale and tar sands industries since the first release and to include profiles of additional companies engaged in oil shale and tar sands resource and technology development. Each of the companies profiled in the original report has been extended the opportunity to update its profile to reflect progress, current activities and future plans. Acknowledgements This report was prepared by INTEK, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Petroleum Reserves, Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves (DOE/NPOSR) as a part of the AOC Petroleum Support Services, LLC (AOC- PSS) Contract Number DE-FE0000175 (Task 30). Mr. Khosrow Biglarbigi of INTEK, Inc. served as the Project Manager. AOC-PSS and INTEK, Inc. wish to acknowledge the efforts of representatives of the companies that provided information, drafted revised or reviewed company profiles, or addressed technical issues associated with their companies, technologies, and project efforts. Special recognition is also due to those who directly performed the work on this report. Mr. Peter M. Crawford, Director at INTEK, Inc., served as the principal author of the report. -
Oil Shale Tracing Federal Support for Oil Shale Development in the U.S
SUBSIDIZING OIL SHALE TRACING FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR OIL SHALE DEVELOPMENT IN THE U.S. www.taxpayer.net OIL SHALE SPECIMEN. Image Courtesy of United States Geological Survey OIL SHALE SPECIMEN. Image Courtesy of United States Geological Survey lthough the oil shale industry is still in reserves were created to ensure a military oil supply. its commercial infancy, it has a long his- In response, the Bureau of Mines program began A tory of government support that continues research into exploiting oil shale technology and in today. The Bureau of Land Management recently the 1960s private industry followed. But significant issued two new research, development and demon- action was limited until the 1970s, when in response stration leases and new federal regulations for com- to the gas shortages Congress intervened in oil shale mercial leases and royalty rates are expected any day. development, in hopes of creating a domestic fuel Before the federal government goes down that road alternative. Their unsuccessful attempt to spur large- it’s important to take a look back and ask whether we scale commercial development of oil shale and other should be throwing good money after bad. unconventional fossil fuels became a notorious waste Oil shale, or kerogen shale, is a sedimentary rock of federal funds. that contains liquid hydrocarbons that are released Since then federal support has continued in vari- when heated. Considered an oil precursor, kerogen ous forms. Although not a key part of the overall is fossil organic matter that has not had exposure energy policy agenda, federal subsidies continue to to high enough temperatures or been in the ground appear in legislation and administrative actions. -
Facilitating Music Tourism for Scotland's
Facilitating Music Tourism for Scotland’s Creative Economy AHRC Creative Economy Engagement Fellowship Report Dr Matthew Ord Dr Adam Behr Contents Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... i List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... iii Summary of Key findings .............................................................................................................. iii Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... v Further research .............................................................................................................................. vi Introduction: music tourism in Scotland ............................................................................... 1 What is music tourism? What is a music tourist? ........................................................................... 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1. Connecting music and tourism: knowledge and networks ............................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... -
SOUVENIR MARKETING in TOURISM RETAILING SHOPPER and RETAILER PERCEPTIONS by KRISTEN K
SOUVENIR MARKETING IN TOURISM RETAILING SHOPPER AND RETAILER PERCEPTIONS by KRISTEN K. SWANSON, B.S., M.S. A DISSERTATION IN CLOTHING, TEXTILES, AND MERCHANDISING Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved Accepted August, 1994 1 o t.i.H" ^b^/ •b C'J ® 1994 Kristen Kathleen Swanson ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The researcher would like to thank Dr. Patricia Horridge, advisor and friend, for her guidance and support at Texas Tech University. Dr. Horridge continually gives of herself to encourage and inspire her students. Additionally, this researcher would like to thank Dr. Claud Davidson, Dr. linger Eberspacher, Dr. Lynn Huffman, and Dr. JoAnn Shroyer for allowing this exploratory research to take place, and keep the study grounded. Each committee member took time to listen, evaluate and strengthen this study. Thank you to Tom Combrink, Arizona Hospitality Research and Resource Center, Northern Arizona University, for assisting with the statistical analysis. Further, this researcher would like to thank all of the graduate students who came before her, for it is by their accomplishments and mistakes that the present study was enhanced. The researcher would like to thank her husband James Power, her parents Richard and Bonnie Swanson, and Bill and Ruby Power, and special friends Chris and Judy Everett for their constant support in accomplishing this study and the degree which comes with the work. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii ABSTRACT vii LIST OF TABLES ix CHAPTER L INTRODUCTION 1 Theoretical Framework 2 Statement of Problem 3 Purposes of the Study 6 Research Objectives and Questions 7 Research Objectives 7 Research Questions 8 Limitations 9 Definition of Terms 9 II. -
Lesson 1: Introduction to Hospitality and Tourism
Lesson 1: Introduction to Hospitality and Tourism Unit: Hospitality and Tourism Lesson 1: Introduction to Hospitality and Tourism National Content Standards Grade Level 10-12 10.1.1 Determine the roles and functions of individuals engaged in hospitality, tourism, and recreation careers. 10.1.2 Explore opportunities for employment and entrepreneurial endeavors. 10.1.4 Examine the impact of hospitality, tourism, and recreation occupations on local, state, national, and global economies. Objectives Upon completion of this lesson, students will be able to: Explain what the Hospitality and Tourism industry is and how it affects economies Give examples of jobs relating to and/or affected by the different sectors of the H & T industry. Show how tourism dollars flow into an economy because of the H & T industry Introduction The word hospitality comes from the Latin word hospes, which means host or guest. Hospitality has come to mean meeting the needs of guests with kindness and goodwill. The hospitality and tourism industry (H &T industry) meets the needs of people with kindness and goodwill while they are away from their homes. The H & T industry is broken into four service sectors: food and beverage, lodging, recreation, and travel and tourism. According to the World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC), H & T is the world’s largest industry, and has a current annual growth rate of 4.2% worldwide. In USA dollars, the world H & T industry is expected to generate over $6.4 trillion in 2007. By 2016 it is projected to generate $12.1 trillion. Hospitality creates jobs, allows economies to grow, and helps people explore the world for personal satisfaction or business. -
Energy Development Water Needs Assessment Update PHASE III FINAL REPORT
Submitted to: Colorado and Yampa‐White‐Green Basin Roundtables Energy Development Water Needs Assessment Update PHASE III FINAL REPORT Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 1002 Walnut Street, Suite 200 Boulder, Colorado 80302 and Canyon Water Resources, LLC 685 Canyon Creek Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 June 30, 2014 ENERGY DEVELOPMENT WATER NEEDS ASSESSMENT UPDATE Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 THE WATER SUPPLY PLANNING PROCESS ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Basin Roundtables ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Interbasin Compact Committee .................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Basin Implementation Plans (BIP) ................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Energy Water Needs Assessments ................................................................................................ 3 2.4.1 Overview of Phase I Study .................................................................................................... 3 2.4.2 Overview of the Phase II Energy Development Water Needs Study .................................... 7 3.0 COMMERCIAL OIL SHALE WATER DEMANDS .................................................................................