DOCSLIB.ORG

Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Agenda Waterfront Transit Network Update Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) July 23, 2020 Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Agenda 1. Project Overview 1. Context 2. Background 3. Timeline 2. Portal Selection Study - Summary of findings 3. Network Phasing Study – Upcoming work 4. EA Addenda/TPAP – Upcoming work 5. Preliminary Design and Engineering – Upcoming work Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Context Distillery Loop Union Station Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Background • In April 2019 , City Council endorsed the streetcar loop expansion at Union Station as the preferred option for the Union Queens Quay Link, and directed staff to commence the preliminary design and engineering phase of the extension of light rail transit to the East Bayfront beginning in 2020. • The first part of this work includes feasibility studies to assess: • An alternative portal location for the LRT along Queens Quay between Bay Street and Yonge Street, which may provide overall cost and public realm benefits • Consideration of phasing option(s) that may expedite the east-west streetcar service on Queens Quay to the East Bayfront Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Timeline Last time we met We are here TTC East Preliminary Transit Preliminary Bayfront Design – EBF Waterfront Union Station Project Design and Transit Portal + Transit – Queens Assessment Engineering Class EA Tunnel Reset Quay Link Process Structures Study (TPAP) (PDE) 2010 2011 2018 2019 2020 2020-2021 2020-2021 Study area from Preliminary Council Council approved Refine two Identify phase 1 Complete the Complete PDE Bay to Cherry design and cost directed streetcar loop implementation TPAP process (30% design) three St. portal location analysis for portal feasibility study expansion. designs and options for the for the section focus areas: east of Yonge St. to evaluate Union loop and from Union Portal Location update costing 1 - Union loop, on Queens higher-order Study potential surface network Station to the tunnel, Queens Quay between Complications transit options alternative portal Evaluate two Distillery Loop. Quay station and Yonge and and costs with to connect location at next portal options This will replace Portal Freeland was CSO relocation Union Station stage of detail. This includes previous EAs in recommended was studied. to existing and Consult exploration of the the corridor as preferred Requested staff 2A - Surface section approved LRT stakeholders council directed option. Potential to commence from Portal to east and west and public phasing option environmental preliminary Parliament of Bay St. and regarding issues due to the design and Queens Quay. implications presence of wood engineering. 2B - Queens Quay crib walls at East Extension and Yonge Slip were connection to identified. Distillery Loop via New Cherry Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Portal Selection Study Study Overview and Background Outcomes of the 2010 EA • The Portal west of Yonge had significant impacts on adjacent commercial properties • The Portal east of Yonge was selected as the preferred location Subsequent Design and Costing • The Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) at the foot of Yonge Street would need to be relocated at significantly higher costs than originally anticipated • Updated option west of Yonge, with a Yonge Street slip fill underwent further conceptual design This Study • Update design to reflect new findings and to mitigate issues • Update costing to reflect changes • Re-evaluate the updated designs and select a preferred alternative Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Portal Selection Study Options (2010 EA) Q1 – Portal West of Yonge Street Q2 – Portal East of Yonge Street Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Portal Selection Study Options (2020) Q1A – Portal West of Yonge Street Changes from 2010 Design • Access to Hotel and Jack Layton Ferry Terminal from the foot of Yonge Street Slip • Maintains south side running TTC Right-of-way • Removes access laneway along Queens Quay Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Portal Selection Study Options (2020) Q2A – Portal East of Yonge Street Changes from 2010 Design • Updated Costing • CSO relocation Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Portal Selection Study Evaluation Criteria Option Q1A (2020) – portal west of Yonge Option Q2A (2020) – portal east of Yonge Planning Policies No decision relevant factors Urban Design Opportunity for additional open space Maintains existing unsignalized at base of Yonge Street driveways and loading zones conflicting Removes unsignalized driveways on with MGT MGT, improving trail conditions Transportation Takes bus and taxi loading off street, Avoids a signalized intersection for which was conflicting with the Martin = transit at Yonge/Queens Quay. A t- = Goodman Trail intersection is maintained. Socio-Economic Relocation of vehicular entrance to a Minimal impact driveway that is not along the building frontage Natural and Cultural No decision relevant factors Cost and $40-50 Million ($2020) less in project Requires relocation of CSO Constructability cost Less operating/maintenance cost (approx. $10 Million NPV over 30 years) Overall: Technically Preferred Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Portal Selection Study Next Steps Next Steps • Further discussion with impacted stakeholders • Identify ownership/maintenance responsibilities • Public Consultation • Finalize and select option to bring to 30% design Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Network Phasing Study Study Overview The purpose of this study is to evaluate alternative Phase 1 options for the phased funding and implementation of the Waterfront Transit Network. The study analyzes the phase 1 delivery options for 2 separate sections: 1. Area 1 – Union Station Phasing 2. Area 2 – Surface Network Phasing Study Objectives: Provide options for staging full project to bring improved transit sooner Considerations: • Capacity of Union Station streetcar loop constrains ability to introduce new service on Waterfront East • Expansion of Union Station streetcar loop is most complex and lengthy element of construction • Alignment and coordination with other projects in the corridor and continued development of East Bayfront and Quayside Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Network Phasing Study Area 1 – Union Station • How many new platforms are needed at Union Station in Phase 1? • Use update ridership demand model to determine what is required to satisfy demand at the Union Loop in terms of vehicle headways and passenger flow • Achieve acceptable passenger level of service Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Network Phasing Study Area 2 – Surface Network • What is the phase 1 terminus in the east? • What is the most strategic phase 1 implementation of the network in terms of construction phasing and value for money • Is an interim solution with a continuous through-movement along Queens Quay viable? • Is an interim bus-based solution a possibility? Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 EA Addendum Lapse of Time • 10 years has passed since the East Bayfront Transit Environmental Assessment was published. In order to update the EA, a review of changes to the planning, design and project environment would need to be completed and an addendum would be filed which summarizes this review. • An alternative approach to the EA addendum is to go through a new Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Changes to the Project Design A Union Station Streetcar Loop B Queens Quay Station A C Streetcar Portal Location D Yonge Street Slip Lake Fill A E Temporary Turnaround Loop (At Parliament Street) F F Parliament Street Alignment G E (Lakeshore Blvd. to Queen’s Quay) H G Queens Quay Blvd. Alignment (Small St. to Silo St.) B C D H Parliament Street Lakefill Waterfront Transit Network (East Bayfront Transit EA, 2010) Waterfront Transit Network (Lower Don Lands Master Plan EA, 2014) Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) • The TPAP is the environmental assessment process designed specifically for transit projects. • Rather than filing amendments to multiple EAs, this approach would consolidate all changes along the corridor, creating an updated transit project to go through the TPAP process • No impact to Preliminary Design and Engineering (PDE) timelines • More reliable timelines than the EA addendum process • More simplified process for future addendums if required through PDE process • Similar amount of background technical work required to complete as the addendum process Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) 30 Day Publish Draft Environmental City Staff City Council Review/Objection Pre-planning Project Report (EPR) Report Approval Publish EPR Period DRAFT 30 DAYS 120 DAYS COMMENCEMENT COMPLETION Notice of 35 Day Pre-Planning Notice of 120 Day Public Completion Minister’s Consultation Commencement Review Consultation Period Review Period Waterfront Transit Network Update – Summer 2020 Preliminary Design and Engineering Overview Scope 1) 30% design for the Union Loop, tunnel, Queens Quay Station and Portal. Managed by TTC. 2A) 30% design for the section between the Portal and the Silos (Future Silo Street). Managed by Waterfront Toronto. 2B) 30% design for the Queens Quay East extension to New Cherry Street and design along New Cherry Street, from Queens
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Expropriation of Part of 228-230 Queens Quay West
    GM8.19 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Expropriation of Part of 228-230 Queens Quay West and Part of the Lands at the Rear of 250-270 Queens Quay West for the Reconstruction of the York/Bay/Yonge Off-ramp from the F.G. Gardiner Expressway Date: October 23, 2015 To: Government Management Committee From: Chief Corporate Officer Wards: Ward 20 – Trinity Spadina Reference P:\2015\Internal Services\RE\Gm15038re (AFS #21976) Number: SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to seek authorization from City Council to commence proceedings for the expropriation of certain lands forming part of the condominium property known municipally as 228-230 Queens Quay West and certain lands located to the north (rear) of the condominium properties known municipally as 250-270 Queens Quay West. These lands are required for the reconstruction and realignment of the Gardiner Expressway's York/Bay/Yonge off ramp (the "Project") with a new ramp to Lower Simcoe Street. While discussions with the affected owner and condominium corporations are ongoing, it appears unlikely that satisfactory negotiated terms can be achieved, as the required land is directly part of, or subject to easements in favour of, condominium properties. Pursuant to the Condominium Act (Ontario), a condominium corporation is prohibited from selling part of the condominium's common elements unless at least 80% of the unit owners vote in favour of the sale and 80% of those persons with a registered claim against the property consent in writing to the sale. In order to release easements that benefit a condominium, a majority, or in some cases 80%, of the unit owners must approve the release.
    [Show full text]
  • PATH Underground Walkway
    PATH Marker Signs ranging from Index T V free-standing outdoor A I The Fairmont Royal York Hotel VIA Rail Canada H-19 pylons to door decals Adelaide Place G-12 InterContinental Toronto Centre H-18 Victory Building (80 Richmond 1 Adelaide East N-12 Hotel D-19 The Hudson’s Bay Company L-10 St. West) I-10 identify entrances 11 Adelaide West L-12 The Lanes I-11 W to the walkway. 105 Adelaide West I-13 K The Ritz-Carlton Hotel C-16 WaterPark Place J-22 130 Adelaide West H-12 1 King West M-15 Thomson Building J-10 95 Wellington West H-16 Air Canada Centre J-20 4 King West M-14 Toronto Coach Terminal J-5 100 Wellington West (Canadian In many elevators there is Allen Lambert Galleria 11 King West M-15 Toronto-Dominion Bank Pavilion Pacific Tower) H-16 a small PATH logo (Brookfield Place) L-17 130 King West H-14 J-14 200 Wellington West C-16 Atrium on Bay L-5 145 King West F-14 Toronto-Dominion Bank Tower mounted beside the Aura M-2 200 King West E-14 I-16 Y button for the floor 225 King West C-14 Toronto-Dominion Centre J-15 Yonge-Dundas Square N-6 B King Subway Station N-14 TD Canada Trust Tower K-18 Yonge Richmond Centre N-10 leading to the walkway. Bank of Nova Scotia K-13 TD North Tower I-14 100 Yonge M-13 Bay Adelaide Centre K-12 L TD South Tower I-16 104 Yonge M-13 Bay East Teamway K-19 25 Lower Simcoe E-20 TD West Tower (100 Wellington 110 Yonge M-12 Next Destination 10-20 Bay J-22 West) H-16 444 Yonge M-2 PATH directional signs tell 220 Bay J-16 M 25 York H-19 390 Bay (Munich Re Centre) Maple Leaf Square H-20 U 150 York G-12 you which building you’re You are in: J-10 MetroCentre B-14 Union Station J-18 York Centre (16 York St.) G-20 in and the next building Hudson’s Bay Company 777 Bay K-1 Metro Hall B-15 Union Subway Station J-18 York East Teamway H-19 Bay Wellington Tower K-16 Metro Toronto Convention Centre you’ll be entering.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Queens Quay Construction Liaison Committee Meeting #12 Summary Wednesday, February 6, 2013 1:00Pm – 2:30Pm Waterfront Toronto – 20 Bay Street
    Meeting Minutes Queens Quay Construction Liaison Committee Meeting #12 Summary Wednesday, February 6, 2013 1:00pm – 2:30pm Waterfront Toronto – 20 Bay Street Attendance: Kelly Gorman - (250/251,260,270 Queens Quay West) Pina Mallozi – (Waterfront Toronto) Chris Hodgson – (Harbourfront Centre) Luigi Cifa (Eastern Construction) Blair Keetch - (PawsWay) Robert Pasut (Eastern Construction) Carol Jolly – (Waterfront BIA) Curtis Keen (Eastern Construction) Peter Wood – (270 Queens Quay) Levco Wynnyckyj (Eastern Construction) Pam Mazza – (TICA/QCYC) Simon Karam (Waterfront Toronto) Ulla Colgrass (YQNA) James Roche (Waterfront Toronto) Diego Sinagoga (Toronto Transit Commission) Samantha Gileno (Waterfront Toronto) Henry Byres – (City of Toronto BIA Office) Maggie Mu (Toronto Hydro) Vicki Barron – (Waterfront Reg. Trust) Lee Morrison – (PowerLine Plus) Jen Chan – (Councillor Vaughan’s Office) Linda Leonard – (PowerLine Plus) Opening Remarks & Welcome – Samantha Gileno Agenda 1) Project Update Approvals & Permits Construction Tenders Review Completed Construction Activities Eastern Construction/ Waterfront Toronto TTC Demolition Site Services (Storm and Sanitary) Peter Slip Bridge York Street Layby Bell Update Toronto Hydro Update TTC Portal 2) Upcoming Construction Activities Eastern Construction/ Waterfront Toronto TTC Demolition Site Services (Storm and Sanitary) Peter Slip Bridge York Street Layby Bell Update Toronto Hydro Update TTC Portal 3) Traffic Management Update 4) Communication Survey 5) CLC Member Feedback/ Discussion 1) Project Updates: Approvals and Permits (Pina Mallozzi) 1) February 1 – We received our full Construction Permit for the Queens Quay project. 2) Traffic Management Plan 1B3 – Was approved by the City 3) Spadina Loop - Discussion is underway with the TTC regarding methodologies and scheduling for this work Construction Tenders & Construction Activities: (James Roche) Tenders: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Street, Between Harbour Street and Queens Quay West (York Street, Bay Street, and Yonge Street Ramp Removal)
    REPORT FOR ACTION Parking Amendments - Bay Street, between Harbour Street and Queens Quay West (York Street, Bay Street, and Yonge Street Ramp Removal) Date: October 26, 2017 To: Toronto and East York Community Council From: Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District Wards: Ward 28, Toronto Centre-Rosedale SUMMARY As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bay Street, City Council approval of this report is required. Transportation Services is requesting approval to amend the existing parking regulations on the east side of Bay Street, between Harbour Street and Queens Quay West. The proposed changes will allow for safe and efficient northbound right-turns from Bay Street to Harbour Street, and also improve sight lines at this intersection. RECOMMENDATIONS The Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, recommends that: 1. City Council rescind the existing designated commercial loading zone in effect from 4:30 p.m. of one day to 8:00 a.m. of the next following day Monday to Friday and anytime Saturday, Sunday, and public holidays from July 1 to August 31, inclusive; Anytime from September 1 of one year to June 30 of the next following year, inclusive on the east side of Bay Street, between a point 53.6 metres north of Queens Quay West and a point 28 metres further north. 2. City Council rescind the existing designated bus parking zone in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday to Friday from July 1 to August 31, inclusive, for a maximum period of 1 hour on the east side of Bay Street, between a point 53.6 metres north of Queens Quay West and a point 28 metres further north.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx
    2020 No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx Top100 Projects 2020 One Man Changes the Face of 2020’s Top 10 Top100 Projects — 2020 f not for one individual, this year’s Top100 may have looked An annual report inserted in familiar. ReNew Canada’s I When this year’s research process began, there was little change within this year’s Top 10, as many of the nation’s January/February 2020 issue megaprojects were still in progress. Significant progress has been made on all of the projects we saw grace the Top 10 in our report last year, but completion dates extend beyond the end of the MANAGING Andrew Macklin 2019 calendar year. EDITOR [email protected] Enter Matt Clark, Metrolinx’s Chief Capital Officer, who took GROUP over the position from Peter Zuk. You see, when Zuk was in charge Todd Latham PUBLISHER of publicly expressing capital budgets, particularly in the context of the GO Expansion project, he had done so by breaking down PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski the $13.5 billion spend by corridor. That breakdown led to the full expansion represented by as many as nine projects in the content ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIORDESIGN of the Top100. Clark does it differently. In the quarterly reports made public ASSOCIATE following Metrolinx board meetings, the capital projects for the Simran Chattha EDITOR GO Expansion are broken down into three allotments (on corridor, off corridor, and early works). The result? Six less GO Expansion CONTENT AND MARKETING Todd Westcott projects in the Top100, but two new projects in our Top 10 MANAGER including a new number one.
    [Show full text]
  • Caledonia GO Station Environmental Assessment Study
    Caledonia GO Station Environmental Assessment Study Public Meeting #1 Summary Report Metrolinx R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited 6990 Creditview Road, Unit 2 Mississauga ON L5N 8R9 CANADA August 2015 300034767.0000 Metrolinx i Caledonia GO Station Environmental Assessment Study Public Meeting #1 Summary Report August 2015 Distribution List No. of Hard PDF Email Organization Name Copies 0 Yes Yes Metrolinx Record of Revisions Revision Date Description 0 July 2015 Draft Submission to Metrolinx 1 August 2015 Final Submission to Metrolinx R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited Report Prepared By: Ashley Gallaugher Environmental Scientist AG:mp Report Reviewed By: Jennifer Vandermeer, P.Eng. Environmental Assessment Lead Jim Georgas, C.E.T. Transit Manager R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited 300034767.0000 034767_Caledonia GO Station TPAP EA Public Meeting 1 Summary Report.docx Metrolinx ii Caledonia GO Station Environmental Assessment Study Public Meeting #1 Summary Report August 2015 Executive Summary PROJECT Caledonia GO Station, Transit Project Assessment Process Environmental Assessment (EA) Study PROPONENT Metrolinx ACTIVITY Public Meeting #1, Open House Format DATE, TIME & May 26, 2015 LOCATION 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. York Memorial Collegiate 2690 Eglinton Avenue West, Toronto, ON, M6M 1T9 PROJECT TEAM Elise Croll, Metrolinx MEMBERS Trevor Anderson, Metrolinx PRESENT Carolina Daza Ortiz, Metrolinx Tania Gautam, Metrolinx Georgina Collymore, Metrolinx Vanessa Anders, Metrolinx Doug Keenie R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited (Burnside) Jim Georgas, Burnside Jennifer Vandermeer, Burnside Debanjan Mookerjea, Burnside • To describe the existing study corridor and opportunities. PURPOSE • To introduce Metrolinx’ transportation goals. • To describe the proposed study and purpose. • To present the proposed infrastructure for the new Caledonia GO Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Central Waterfront Public Forum #2
    TORONTO CENTRAL WATERFRONT PUBLIC FORUM #2 Queens Quay Revitalization EA Bathurst Street to Lower Jarvis Street Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Schedule C) December 08, 2008 1 WATERFRONT TORONTO UPDATE 2 Central Waterfront International Design Competition 3 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 4 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 5 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 6 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 7 East Bayfront Waters Edge Promenade: Design Underway 8 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 9 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 10 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 Metropolis Article 11 Rees Wavedeck: Construction Underway 12 Simcoe Wavedeck: Construction Underway 13 Spadina Bridge: Construction Early-2009 14 What Have We Been Doing for the Past 11 Months? • Consider and follow up on comments from Public Forum 1 • Assess baseline technical feasibility of design alternatives – Over 90 meetings in total: • City and TTC technical staff • Partner agencies •Stakeholders • Landowners/Property Managers • Adjacent project efforts • Advanced transit and traffic modelling • Develop Alternative Design Concepts and Evaluation (Phase 3) • Coordination with East Bayfront Transit EA 15 Study Area: Revised 16 Overview • Review of EA Phases 1 & 2 from Public Forum #1: January 2008 • EA Phase 3: Alternative Design Alternatives – Long list of Design Alternatives – Evaluation of Design Alternatives • Next Steps – Evaluation Criteria for Shortlisted Design
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line
    EX9.1 Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line As directed by City Council in April 2019, City and TTC staff have assessed the Province’s proposed Ontario Line. The details of this assessment are provided in this attachment. 1. Project Summary 1.1. Project Description The Ontario Line was included as part of the 2019 Ontario Budget1 as a transit project that will cover similar study areas as the Relief Line South and North, as well as a western extension. The proposed project is a 15.5-kilometre higher-order transit line with 15 stations, connecting from Exhibition GO station to Line 5 at Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, near the Science Centre station, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Ontario Line Proposal (source: Metrolinx IBC) Since April 2019, technical working groups comprising staff from the City, TTC, Metrolinx, Infrastructure Ontario and the Ministry of Transportation met regularly to understand alignment and station location options being considered for the Ontario 1 http://budget.ontario.ca/2019/contents.html Attachment 4 - Assessment of Ontario Line Page 1 of 20 Line. Discussions also considered fleet requirements, infrastructure design criteria, and travel demand modelling. Metrolinx prepared an Initial Business Case (IBC) that was publicly posted on July 25, 2019.2 The IBC compared the Ontario Line and Relief Line South projects against a Business As Usual scenario. The general findings by Metrolinx were that "both Relief Line South and Ontario Line offer significant improvements compared to a Business As Usual scenario, generating $3.4 billion and $7.4 billion worth of economic benefits, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation 7:20 Questions of Clarification 7:30 Facilitated Open House 8:30 Adjourn
    Waterfront Transit “Reset” Phase 2 Study Public Information & Consultation Meetings September 18 & 26, 2017 Agenda 6:00 Open House 6:30 Agenda Review, Opening Remarks and Introductions 6:40 Study Overview and Presentation 7:20 Questions of Clarification 7:30 Facilitated Open House 8:30 Adjourn 2 Project Study Team • A Partnership of: • The project study team is led by a joint City-TTC- Waterfront Toronto Executive Steering Committee • Metrolinx, City of Mississauga and MiWay have also provided input on relevant aspects of the study 3 What’s the Purpose of this Meeting? • Present the waterfront transit network travel demand considerations to 2041 • Present and gather feedback on options assessment for transit improvements in key areas of the network, including: – Union Station – Queens Quay Connection – Humber Bay Link – Bathurst - Fleet - Lake Shore – Queens Quay Intersection • Report the overall draft findings of the Phase 2 Study, priorities, and draft directions for further study prior to reporting to Executive Committee and Council 4 Study Timeline 5 Phase 1 Recap To view the Phase 1 Report and other background material, please visit the City’s website: www.toronto.ca/waterfronttransit 6 Vision Provide high quality transit that will integrate waterfront communities, jobs, and destinations and link the waterfront to the broader City and regional transportation network Objectives Connect waterfront communities locally and to Downtown with reliable and convenient transit service: • Promote and support residential and employment growth
    [Show full text]
  • TTC Typography History
    With the exception of Eglinton Station, 11 of the 12 stations of The intention of using Helvetica and Univers is unknown, however The Toronto Subway Font (Designer Unknown) the original Yonge Subway line have been renovated extensively. with the usage of the latter on the design of the Spadina Subway in Based on Futura by Paul Renner (1928) Some stations retained the original typefaces but with tighter 1978, it may have been an internal decision to try and assimilate tracking and subtle differences in weight, while other stations subsequent renovations of existing stations in the aging Yonge and were renovated so poorly there no longer is a sense of simplicity University lines. The TTC avoided the usage of the Toronto Subway seen with the 1954 designs in terms of typographical harmony. font on new subway stations for over two decades. ABCabc RQKS Queen Station, for example, used Helvetica (LT Std 75 Bold) in such The Sheppard Subway in 2002 saw the return of the Toronto Subway an irresponsible manner; it is repulsively inconsistent with all the typeface as it is used for the names of the stations posted on ABCabc RQKS other stations, and due to the renovators preserving the original platfrom level. Helvetica became the primary typeface for all TTC There are subtle differences between the two typefaces, notably the glass tile trim, the font weight itself looks botched and unsuitable. wayfinding signages and informational material system-wide. R, Q, K, and S; most have different terminals, spines, and junctions. ST CLAIR SUMMERHILL BLOOR DANGER DA N GER Danger DO NOT ENTER Do Not Enter Do Not Enter DAVISVILLE ST CL AIR SUMMERHILL ROSEDALE BLOOR EGLINTON DAVISVILLE ST CLAIR SUMMERHILL ROSEDALE BLOOR EGLINTON DAVISVILLE ST CLAIR SUMMERHILL ROSEDALE BLOOR The specially-designed Toronto Subway that embodied the spirit of modernism and replaced with a brutal mix of Helvetica and YONGE SUBWAY typeface graced the walls of the 12 stations, progress.
    [Show full text]
  • 550 Queen's Quay W #311
    LIST PRICE $$259,800 ADDRESS 550 Queen’s Quay W #311 See More Photos And Community Information At… www.TorontoRealEstate.ca How Much Can YOU Afford? Based on 4.95% 5% 10% 15% 25% Mortgage Rate Down Down Down Down Down Payment $13,000 $26,000 $39,000 $65,000 TOTAL Monthly Payment $2,125 $2,025 $1,950 $1,750 (Mortgage, taxes, condo fees & utilities) Closing Costs $17,000 $30,000 $43,000 $69,000 (Including down payment) Gross Income Req’d To $68,500 $64,000 $60,500 $52,500 Qualify For The Mortgage Above calculations are estimates only for income required and closing costs … buyer must verify for themselves! Welcoming lobby with friendly, 24 hr concierge, terrific gym, sauna, and whirlpool. Huge party room with kitchen and library/TV area. Terrific city and lake views from the rooftop deck. List Of Neighbourhood Features Restaurants Many restaurants along Queens Quay … and fine dining in downtown Toronto, all the way from Hooters and Gretzky’s to the top of the CN Tower Night Clubs / Theatre duMaurier and Premier Dance Theatres, CIBC Stage and more at Harbourfront Centre … and Toronto’s Entertainment District … approx. King to Richmond, Duncan to Peter; The Paramount at Richmond and John has multi-theatres for 1st run movies, and the Princess of Wales at King & John for live theatre and musicals. Bookstores / Coffee Cafes all along Harbourfront; Chapters at SW corner of Richmond & Peter; Starbucks; Second Cup Shops at Pier 6, Harbourfront Parks Toronto Music Garden, 475 Queens Quay W; Greenspace at the Ferry Docks, ferry access to the Toronto Islands with more than 230 hectares of parkland; Spadina Quay Wetland; Harbour Square; Coronation Park, south of Lakeshore, west of Stadium Rd, and along the lake front.
    [Show full text]
  • Redesigning Streets for a Growing City and Better Neighbourhoods
    Toronto’s Great Streets Redesigning Streets for a Growing City and Better Neighbourhoods July 2018 Toronto’s Great Streets Redesigned for Greatness Harbord Street Roncesvalles Avenue St. Clair Avenue West Bike lanes for safer mobility & village improvement Toronto placemaking at its best The streetcar neighbourhood The 2014 redesign installed continuous cycling Completed in 2011, the Roncesvalles redesign The dedicated streetcar lane, opened in 2010, has infrastructure from Ossington to Parliament, trans- focused on placemaking and people, improving safety made hopping on transit an efficient alternative to forming Harbord into one of the most well-travelled and enhancing pedestrian space while strengthening the car and has transformed this midtown corridor bike routes in the city. Roncy’s capacity to serve local needs. into a vibrant main street. Queens Quay West Market Street A street for all users A future-proof street for people (and patios!) The 2015 redesign repositioned Queens Quay as Market Street’s 2014 redesign prioritizes the pedes- a public waterfront promenade, reallocating street trian experience to support adjacent retail and space to accommodate all modes – pedestrians, restaurants while celebrating the unique heritage cyclists, transit, and cars. and culture of St. Lawrence Market. Toronto’s Great Streets 2 Toronto’s Great Streets The Ones to Watch Bloor Street King Street Downtown Yonge Street Bike lanes on Bloor from east to west Relief for Toronto’s busiest surface transit route Canada’s Main Street See (a) credit image The Bike Lane Pilot Project on Bloor Street proved to The King Street Pilot Project transformed this busy A vision to pedestrianize a busy foot traffic stretch of be a great success and the lanes are now permanent.
    [Show full text]