Presentation Update Harts River 2017.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Presentation Update Harts River 2017.Pdf 2017 NOTE Present Project: Prospecting Rights still held or applied for. Historic Project: This refers to the areas and work completed on the entire Project from day one. Introduction The historic target area covered a large area held under six (6) different Prospecting Rights which were applied for sequentially as more information on the deposit became available (Historic Project). The obtaining of such a large area was necessary as there are often large variations in the nature and potential of these alluvial deposits. Some drilling was done on most of these Prospecting Right areas (areas consist of one to several farms with different land owners) and the areas of higher potential were kept (Documented under the heading Present Project). It is necessary to include the results of the work done on the Historic Project, which includes the three (3) Rights held at present, as the work done outside the Present Project speaks to the potential of the Present Project and because the major portion of the test mining was done on the farm Zamenkomst (outside Present Project). On Zamenkomst only a small portion of the good gravel was preserved and mined out (Prospecting Right terminated). At the time, when this test mining was carried out, no other Prospecting Rights were available and the contractors moved else ware. It is important to note that all Test Mining was carried out with no cost to the “Company” (Contractors sold the Diamonds for their account and only the data and results of the Test Mining was retained by the “Company”). The only costs carried by the “Company” was Drilling and Salaries. To make it easier for the reader to understand the presentation, an attempt will be made to split it, where possible, into: Present and Historic Project Summary of the Harts River Project The Harts River Project comprises of a contiguous block of farms situated in the Northern Cape of South Africa between Vryburg and Taung, known as the Brussels Block. At present license covers 4257.8249 hectare (42.6 square kilometers) (Present Project). The Present Project Area lies approximately 20 km south of Vryburg and stretches for approximately 10 km from northeast to southwest and deposit varies in width between 600 and 2000 meters and in thickness between 1 and 5 meters. The Present Project Area comprises four farms, or portions there of, and form a contiguous block from Zwartkrans Por. 0 in the northeast to Uitenhage Por 3 in the southwest (Present Project). The deposit (Historic and Present Project) has good potential as it yields large diamonds of very good quality and the largest stones recovered to date were 60.21, 24.29, 19,73 and 16.65 carats respectively and the highest price obtained was US$ 9469.44 (per carat) for the 24.29 carat stone (US$ 230012.69 for single stone at 2006/2007 prices, Carat prices have since risen by 20% or more). % of Stones Larger than 5 Carat - 32 % - Calcrete Gravel (Historic Project) % of Stones Larger than 5 Carat - 25 % - Calcrete Gravel (Historic Project) % of Stones Larger than 10 Carat - 19 % - Calcrete Gravel (Historic Project) • Potentially 35 km palaeo-river gravel deposit, with large diamonds. – 1,500 to >10 000 US$/carat (Present Project represents +-10 km of this distance and represents best portion of this Historic Project area.) • 1,200 carats recovered from Bulk Sampling in 2006/2007 (Historic Project Zamenkomst only) Sold for 1,050 US$/carat average(Historic Project Zamenkomst only). As these are 2006/2007 prices and the $ price per carat has increased substantially since then, it would not be unrealistic to put the present price average price at 1,250 US$/carat. Best priced for a parcel 1,942 US$/carat (Historic Project Zamenkomst only) • Expanding resource base further through exploration. • Other large drainage systems with good potential are developed in close proximity to the Project Area. • There is a high potential for finding larger, high value stones. • Only 10 km of the original Historic Project (35 km) is included in the present Brussels Project Area. • >213 542 m3 gravel has been treated (> 491 147 tons) in bulk sampling ( Historic and Present Project Areas). • Gravel treated with 3 x 14’ rotisserie pans, 30 tons/hour each, DMS and flow-sort recovery of diamonds from pan concentrates. • The present Project Resource indicates 187 233.62 carats of diamonds at US$ 1000+ /carat. This indicates an in-situ value of US$ 187 233 620 at a grade of 0.30 cpht. These are historic prices and with new elevated prices the in- situ value could be 20% higher (US$ 224 680 344). • Bulk sampling carried out by small scale contractors. Test mining to be continued in near future on Present Project areas LOCALITY The Project is situated approximately 20 kilometers due south of Vryburg in the Northern Cape and straddles the Vryburg/Taung regional tar road (R49). INFRASTRUCTURE The Eskom grid is well developed throughout the project area and sidelines from the main grid supply all farms. Water is abundant in the area from drill holes and the waterlogged Spruit Gravels. In addition to this the Taung/Vryburg water pipeline, which supplies Vryburg with water from the Vaal Harts irrigation scheme, passes through the center of the project area and permission has already been granted by the local authorities to purchase and pump water from the line. PRESENT PROJECT Drilling Completed A total of 415 percussion drill holes have been completed at four (4) localities Gamabot Por’s 2 (Fig 3) & 3 (Fig 4), Zwartkrans Por 0 (Fig 5) and Uitenhage Por 3 (Fig 6). Ore Resources Table 1 PRESENT PROJECT ORE RESOURCES (Including ground applied for) METRIC TONNES (All DRILLED gravel types) Gamabot Por. 2 2789687 Gamabot Por. 3 46300048 Uitenhage Por 3 4982877 Zwartkrans Por 0 13321472 TOTAL TONNES (Drilled) 67394084 PRESENT PROJECT Table 2 PRESENT PROJECT ORE RESOURCES TONNAGES IMMEDIATLY AVAILABLE FOR MINING (Prospecting Rights Granted) METRIC TONNES (All FARM gravel types) Gamabot Por. 3 46300048 TOTAL TONNES (Drilled) 46300048 Table 3 FARMS APPLIED FOR, TONNAGES THAT WILL BECOME AVAILABLE ON GRANTING OF RIGHTS METRIC TONNES (All FARM gravel types) Zwartkrans Por 0 13321472 Gamabot Por. 2 2789687 Uitenhage Por 3 4982877 TOTAL TONNES (Drilled) 21094036 Test Mining Results Table 4 PRESENT PROJECT TEST MINING AND SALES RESULTS (Including farms applied for) Metric Total Grade Average TEST MINED Tonnes Carats Comments cpht US$/CARAT Treated Recovered Gamabot Por 2 11886 30.71 0.26 816.09 Test Mining carried out correctly Poorly Test Mined with very little control. Results of Test Mining Gamabot Por 3 11988 39.09 0.33 Assumed +-800 Sales never received but Grade (cpht) information good Poorly Test Mined with very little Zwartkrans Por control. Results of Test Mining 4991 15.8 0.32 Assumed +-800 0 Sales never received but Grade (cpht) information good TOTALS 28865 85.60 0.30 Prices for these parcels were US$ 800.00 (Historic Prices). It should however be kept in mind that tonnages tested were small (see Table above ) and largest single stone was 5 carats. A lot more tonnages will have to be tested to get a realistic US$ average price. PRESENT PROJECT Legal Status Table 5 TABLE OF PRESENT PROSPECTING RIGHTS STATUS PROSPECTING RIGHT STATUS ACTION TAKEN Existing Prospecting Right is being cancelled and new Gamabot Por 2 New application Application for Prospecting Right will be lodged immediately after old Right has been cancelled Application for an extension of the existing Gamabot Por 3 Existing Prospecting Right Prospecting Right has been granted by the DMR A new Application for a Prospecting Right has been Zwartkrans Por 0 New application accepted by the DMR and is being processed Existing Prospecting Right is being cancelled and new Uitenhage Por 3 New application Application for Prospecting Right will be lodged immediately after old Right has been cancelled PRESENT PROJECT Regional Map showing areas included in the Present Project area relative to the Historic Project Area. Areas with bold borders and that are coloured in blue TOTAL HISTORIC PROJECT HELD UNDER SIX (6) PROSPECTING RIGHTS L o ckerb i e 727 H N Po r. 0 (Rem) 428. 2660h a Kareeb o o mfo n tein 725 HN P o r. 0 S w eet H o me 726 H N 557. 3054h a L o ckern i e 727 H N P o r. 3 L o ckerb i e 727 H N P o r. 7 P o r. 1 856. 7219h a 479. 6979h a B l aau b o sch ku i l 835 H N 720. 1129h a P o r. 9 171. 3064h a Kareeb o o mfo n tein 725 HN P o r. 3 S w eet H o me 726 H N 61. 2606h a S L o ckerb i e 727 H N w P o r. 2 P o r. 8 e 685. 2342h a e t 46. 4318h a 4 H L o ckerb i e 727 H N L o ckerb i e 727 H N 2 P o B l aau b o sch ku i l 835 H N 8 o m P o r. 12 P o r. 4 .2 r e P o r. 8 6 . 21. 4990h a 394. 8784h a 6 4 7 9 2 513. 9363h a L o ckerb i e 727 H N h 6 P o r. 10 a H N 46. 4318h a Ch amio n sklo o f 731 HN P o r. 7 23. 7483h a B l aau b o sch ku i l 835 H N B l aau b o sch ku i l 835 H N Po r.
Recommended publications
  • Ganspan Draft Archaeological Impact Assessment Report
    CES: PROPOSED GANSPAN-PAN WETLAND RESERVE DEVELOPMENT ON ERF 357 OF VAALHARTS SETTLEMENT B IN THE PHOKWANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Archaeological Impact Assessment Prepared for: CES Prepared by: Exigo Sustainability ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (AIA) ON ERF 357 OF VAALHARTS SETTLEMENT B FOR THE PROPOSED GANSPAN-PAN WETLAND RESERVE DEVELOPMENT, FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Conducted for: CES Compiled by: Nelius Kruger (BA, BA Hons. Archaeology Pret.) Reviewed by: Roberto Almanza (CES) DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST Name Institution Roberto Almanza CES DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Version Status 12 August 2019 1.0 Draft 26 August 2019 2.0 Final 3 CES: Ganspan-pan Wetland Reserve Development Archaeological Impact Assessment Report DECLARATION I, Nelius Le Roux Kruger, declare that – • I act as the independent specialist; • I am conducting any work and activity relating to the proposed Ganspan-Pan Wetland Reserve Development in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the client; • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; • I have the required expertise in conducting the specialist report and I will comply with legislation, including the relevant Heritage Legislation (National Heritage Resources Act no. 25 of 1999, Human Tissue Act 65 of 1983 as amended, Removal of Graves and Dead Bodies Ordinance no. 7 of 1925, Excavations Ordinance no. 12 of 1980), the
    [Show full text]
  • SIBU and the Crisis of Water Service Delivery in Sannieshof, North West Province
    SIBU and the crisis of water service delivery in Sannieshof, North West Province C GOUWS, I MOEKETSI, S MOTLOUNG, J TEMPELHOFF, G VAN GREUNING AND L VAN ZYL* Abstract In 2007 the residents of the town of Sannieshof in North West Province declared a dispute with the Tswaing Local Municipality on the grounds that the state of local service delivery left much to be desired. The ratepayers then formed the Sannieshof Inwoners Belastingbetalers Unie (SIBU) which literally took over the functions of local government of the town, functioning as a local government within a local government. This article provides a historical narrative of the conflict between SIBU and Tswaing Local Municipality, a dispute which was taken as far as the provincial High Court. Then follows an outline of conditions in Sannieshof and the townships of Agisanang and Phelindaba. Attention is given to the perceptions of local residents on the prevalent conditions, specifically in respect of water supply and sanitation service delivery. In the third section there are some theoretical perspectives on political culture, socialisation and happiness. A debate is provided on how these phenomena manifest under existing conditions in Sannieshof, and more particularly, in its adjacent townships of Agisanang and Phelindaba. Keywords: Sannieshof Inwoners Belastingbetalers Unie (SIBU), North West Province, service delivery, water supply, sanitation, Tswaing Local Municipality. Disciplines: History, Political Science, Tourism Studies and Public Management and Administration, Industrial Psychology and Wellness Studies. Introduction In November 2007, irate ratepayers of the towns Sannieshof, Ottosdal and Delareyville in South Africa’s North West Province, declared a dispute with Tswaing Local Municipality, the local authority responsible for their municipal services.1 Using the Municipal Finance (Management) Act, 56 of 2003,2 the Municipal Structures Act, 117 of 1998,3 and the Municipal Systems Act, 32 * Research Niche Area for the Cultural Dynamics of Water (CuDyWat).
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeontological Impact Assessment May Be Significantly Enhanced Through Field Assessment by a Professional Palaeontologist
    PALAEONTOLOGICAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT: COMBINED DESKTOP & FIELD- BASED STUDY Proposed Meerkat Solar Power Plant on Portion 3 (Portion of Portion 2) of the Farm Vyflings Pan 598 near Vryburg, Naledi Local Municipality, North-West Province John E. Almond PhD (Cantab.) Natura Viva cc, PO Box 12410 Mill Street, Cape Town 8010, RSA [email protected] February 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The company Meerkat Solar Power Plant (RF) (Pty) Ltd is proposing to develop up to 115 MW photovoltaic solar facility, known as the Meerkat Solar Power Plant, on Portion 3 (Portion of Portion 2) of the Farm Vyflings Pan 598, IN Registration Division, Province of the North-West. The Meerkat Solar Power Plant study area is entirely underlain by late Archaean (c. 2.6 billion year-old) sedimentary rocks of the Schmidtsdrif Subgroup (Ghaap Group, Transvaal Supergroup). These mainly comprise shallow marine siliciclastic sediments and possible lavas of the Vryburg Formation plus carbonate sediments of the Boomplaas Formation. Field assessment suggests that stromatolite-bearing carbonate rocks are not present at surface within the Vryburg and Bomplaas Formation outcrop areas in the study area. The overlying superficial sediments (e.g. sandy soils, calcretised pan deposits) are of low palaeontological sensitivity. It is concluded that, with or without mitigation, the overall impact of the proposed Meerkat Solar Power Plant on Farm Vyflings Pan 598 is of NEGATIVE LOW SIGNIFICANCE in palaeontological heritage terms. Should significant fossil remains - such as well-preserved stromatolites - be exposed during construction, the responsible Environmental Control Officer should safeguard these, preferably in situ. The South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA) should be alerted as soon as possible (Contact details: Mrs Colette Scheermeyer, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Frances Baard District Municipality: Proposed Upgrading of an Anglo Boer War Blockhouse on a Portion of Warrenton Erf 1, Warrenton, Northern Cape Province
    FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY: PROPOSED UPGRADING OF AN ANGLO BOER WAR BLOCKHOUSE ON A PORTION OF WARRENTON ERF 1, WARRENTON, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Archaeological Impact Assessment Prepared for: Frances Baard District Municipality Prepared by: Exigo Sustainability -i- Firefly Investments 224: Platinum Solar Park Project Archaeological Impact Assessment Report HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON A PORTION OF WARRENTON ERF 1 FOR THE PROPOSED UPGRADING OF AN ANGLO BOER WAR BLOCKHOUSE, WARRENTON, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Conducted on behalf of: Frances Baard District Municipality Exigo Sustainability Compiled by: Nelius Kruger (BA, BA Hons. Archaeology Pret.) Reviewed by: Joh-ne Jansen (Frances Baard District Municipality) Document History Document Version 1 (Draft) – 25 March 2016 -i- Firefly Investments 224: Platinum Solar Park Project Archaeological Impact Assessment Report Although Exigo Sustainability exercises due care and diligence in rendering services and preparing documents, Exigo Sustainability accepts no liability, and the client, by receiving this document, indemnifies Exigo Sustainability and its directors, managers, agents and employees against all actions, claims, demands, losses, liabilities, costs, damages and expenses arising from or in connection with services rendered, directly or indirectly by Exigo Sustainability and by the use of the information contained in this document. This document contains confidential and proprietary information equally shared between Exigo Sustainability. and Frances Baard District Municipality, and is protected by copyright in favour of these companies and may not be reproduced, or used without the written consent of these companies, which has been obtained beforehand. This document is prepared exclusively for Frances Baard District Municipality and is subject to all confidentiality, copyright and trade secrets, rules, intellectual property law and practices of South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Toxic Algal Incident in the Orange River Northern Cape 2000
    Potentially Toxic Algal Incident in the Orange River, Northern Cape, 2000 by C.E. van Ginkel & B. Conradie IWQS & NC Region • I bEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY I 0 -,_. TITLE: POTENTIALLY TOXIC ALGAL INCIDENT IN THE ORANGE RIVER, NORTHERN CAPE, 2000. REPORT NUMBER: N/D801/12/DEQ/0800 PROJECT: Eutrophication Project STATUS OF REPORT: Final DATE: July 2001 This report should be cited as: Van Ginkel, C.E. and B. Conradie (2001). Potential toxic algal incident in the Orange River, Northern Cape, 2000. Draft Report No. N/D801/12/DEQ/0800. Institute for Water Quality Studies, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Pretoria. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1. All the external stakeholders who assisted in collecting, storing and transporting samples. These include (not in any order of priority): • Mr Jaco Goussard (JCG Water Treatment) • Mr Gert Meiring (Upington Municipality) • Mr Gawie Moon (Council for Geo Science) • Personnel at the Pelladrift and Namakwa Water Boards • Personnel of the Trans Hex Limited mining company at Reuning and Baken • Personnel of the Alexkor Limited mining company (at the mine and on the farms) • Personnel of Global Diamond Resources at Grasdrift • Personnel of the Richtersveld National Park • Mrs Bettie Nieuwouldt, Richtersveld Farmers' Union • Springbok Lodge and Restaurant perspnnel • Northern Cape Nature Conservation Services • Wilna Barkhuizen at the Vioolsdrift Irrigation Board 2. Personnel of the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) who contributed beyond their normal duties to make the task possible, including: • Personnel from the Institute for Water Quality Studies (IWQS): DWAF who visited Upington promptly to supply preservatives and sampling equipment to the office and assisted the Upington office in numerous logistical arrangements as well as providing expertise as member of the National Toxic Algal Forum (Mrs Carin van Ginkel), laboratory personnel (Eisabe Truter, Chris Carelson, Doris le Roux) and the technical team {Annelise Gerber) who assisted with data collection, analysis and reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 the Alluvial Diamond Deposits of The
    TR ClI- 27 THE ALLUVIAL DIAMOND DEPOSITS OF THE LOWER VAAL RIVER BETWEEN BARKLY WEST AND THE VAAL-HARTS CONFLUENCE IN THE NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA By FABRICE GILBERT MATHEYS B.Sc. (Hons) Thesis snbmitted in partial fnlfllment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geology . Rhodes University Grahamstown DECEMBER 1990 ABSTRACT The alluvial diamond deposits along the Vaal River, between Barkly West and the Vaal-Harts confluence, have been worked for more than one century by thousands of private diggers. The diamonds are recovered from two sedimentary units of Cenozoic age, the Older Gravels and the Younger Gravels. These rest on a basement of Ventersdorp Supergroup andesites and Karoo Sequence sediments, which have been intruded by Cretaceous kimberlites. The gravels are, in turn, overlain by the Riverton Formation and the Hutton Sand. On a large scale, tectonic setting, geomorphology and palaeoclimate have played a major role in the formation of diamondiferous placers in the araa under investigation. A study of the sedimentology of the Younger Gravels was carried out with the aim of acquiring an understanding of tha processes responsible for the economic concentration of high quality diamonds. An investigation of facies assemblages, clast composition, clast size, external geometry, particle morphology and palaeocurrent directions led to the conclusion that the Younger Gravels were deposited in a proximal braided stream environment during high discharge. A small-scale experiment was carried out to test the efficiency of different sedimentological trap sites in concentrating kimberlite indicator minerals. The results show that the concentration of indicator minerals is dependent o~the size fraction choosen, bed roughness and gravel calibre.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Jbs21 (Ewr 17: Lloyds Weir (Harts River) – Osaeh 29.1)
    1 JBS21 (EWR 17: LLOYDS WEIR (HARTS RIVER) – OSAEH 29.1) The information is summarised from DWA (2009c,d; 2010c). The Harts River system is in the C3 drainage region of South Africa and its source is near the town of Lichtenburg in the North West Province, although the larger part of the catchment is situated in the Northern Cape Province. The Harts River flows in a south- westerly direction via Barberspan, the Taung and Spitskop dams, after which it flows into the Vaal River near Delportshoop. 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION EWR 17 falls within MRU Harts C which includes Wentzel Dam which is delineated as a unit. The dam supports the domestic water use in Wentzel and the yield of the dam is fully utilised. The EWR site is in close proximity to OSAEH 29.1. This site was not assessed during the October 2010 field trip and the results of the EWR assessment are summarised below. EWR 17 is situated downstream of Spitskop Dam in the Harts River. The banks are composed of bedrock, and the channel is incised. Paired low benches occur but terraces are absent. Some paths in the upper and lower riparian zones has caused erosion. Fish habitat is well represented at site but flow modification by Spitskop Dam a short distance upstream of site is expected to result in unnatural habitat fluctuation. The weir directly upstream of site may result in unnaturally high abundance of species during migrations. Macroinvertebrate habitat is good with limited aquatic vegetation and mud habitats. Location EWR 17 Lloyds weir Altitude 1114 m Longitude 24.30305 Latitude -28.37694 Southern/Central Kalahari/Ghaap plateau EcoRegion Quaternary catchment C33C 29.02; 30.01 Water Management Area Lower Vaal Geomorphological zone Lower Foothills EWR 17, Lloyds weir.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Characteristics of Yeasts in Water Sources of the North West Province
    Diversity and characteristics of yeasts in water sources of the North West Province By Deidré Alima Bregené Van Wyk (B.Sc Honours) Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Environmental Science, in the School of Biological Science, Faculty of Natural Science, North-West University: Potchefstroom Campus Supervisor: Prof. C.C. Bezuidenhout Co-supervisor: Mr. O.H.J. Rhode Date Submitted: November 2012 ABSTRACT Yeasts form an important part of many ecosystems and significantly contribute to biodiversity. However, yeast biodiversity in the North West Province remains largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to determine the diversity and characteristics of yeasts from water sources in the North West Province, South Africa. Samples were collected over a two year period and included three rivers, a spruit and an inland lake. Temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured on site using a multi- 2- probe. Nitrate (NO3-N), nitrite (NO2-N) and phosphate (PO4 ) levels were determined in the laboratory using Hatch kits and equipment. The pH ranged from 7.2 to 9.2. Elevated EC levels (36-70 mS) were detected especially at the Harts River and Barberspan (38-165 mS) sites. Physico-chemical parameter levels were higher during the cold dry sampling period compared to the warm rainy sampling period. Levels and diversity of yeasts were determined using the membrane filtration method. The highest level of yeasts was detected in the Mooi River and Schoonspruit during 2010 and 2011 sampling periods. Pigmented and non-pigmented yeasts were enumerated from all samples. Over the two year period the highest number of pigmented yeasts was detected in the Schoonspruit samples.
    [Show full text]
  • River, Wetlands, Groundwater and Lakes) in the Upper, Middle and Lower Vaal Water Management Areas (WMA) 8,9,10
    Classification of Significant Water Resources in the Upper Middle and Lower Vaal WMAs Management Class Report Cover Page Management Class Report V14 September 2012 i Classification of Significant Water Resources in the Upper Middle and Lower Vaal WMAs Management Class Report Classification of Significant Water Resources (River, Wetlands, Groundwater and Lakes) in the Upper, Middle and Lower Vaal Water Management Areas (WMA) 8,9,10 MANAGEMENT CLASSES OF THE VAAL RIVER CATCHMENT REPORT: Inception Report Report number: RDM/WMA8,9,10/00/CON/CLA/0212 September 2012 (FINAL) Copyright reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced in any manner without full acknowledgement of the source REFERENCE This report is to be referred to in bibliographies as: Department of Water Affairs, South Africa, September 2012. Classification of Significant Water Resources (River, Wetlands, Groundwater and Lakes) in the Upper, Middle and Lower Vaal Water Management Areas (WMA) 8, 9, 10: Management Classes of the Vaal River Catchment Report Prepared by: WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd in association with DMM Development Consultants CC, Rivers for Africa eFlows Consulting (Pty) Ltd, Conningarth Economists, Koekemoer Aquatic Services and Zitholele Consulting (Pty) Ltd. Report No. RDM/WMA8,9,10/00/CON/CLA/0212 Management Class Report V14 September 2012 i Classification of Significant Water Resources in the Upper Middle and Lower Vaal WMAs Management Class Report DOCUMENT INDEX Reports as part of this project (report status as in September 2012): Index number
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Irrigation on Groundwater at the Vaalharts Irrigation Scheme – Preliminary Assessment
    The influence of Irrigation on Groundwater at the Vaalharts Irrigation Scheme – Preliminary Assessment Report to the Water Research Commission by PMJ Verwey, PD Vermeulen and GJ van Tonder Institute for Groundwater Studies University of the Free State Bloemfontein 9300 WRC Report No. KV 254/10 ISBN 978-1-4312-0057-3 January 2011 The publication of this report emanates from a project entitled The influence of irrigation on groundwater at the Vaalharts Irrigation Scheme – preliminary assessment. (WRC Project No. K8/820) DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use ii Executive Summary Introduction and scope of the investigation A Governmental surveyor by the name H Ford proposed an irrigation scheme in the Harts Valley as early as 1875. The shortage of money and the unemployment due to the depression in the early 1930s led to the announcement by the Government, on 2 November 1933, that the scheme will be built. In 1934 Act 38 of 1934 was approved, giving permission to construct the Vaaldam and to develop the Vaalharts Irrigation Scheme. The water for the scheme was diverted from a weir in the Vaal river (24˚55’30”E : 28˚06’54”S) ± 6.5 km east of Warrenton. The first farmers received their plots in 1938. Today there are 1200 plots that varies in size from 25 to 75 ha, covering a total area of 35 302 ha (31 732 ha in the Northern Cape and 3 570 ha in the North- West Province).
    [Show full text]
  • Bacteriophage Levels and Associated Characteristics in Selected Temperate Water Systems
    Bacteriophage levels and associated characteristics in selected temperate water systems L Bothma 22207694 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in Environmental Sciences at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Supervisor: Prof. CC Bezuidenhout Assistant supervisor: Dr. R Adeleke May 2017 AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation and gratitude to the following people and institutions for their contribution and support towards the completion of this study: Prof. C.C. Bezuidenhout for his patience, guidance, encouragement, time, support and valuable input into making this possible. Dr. R. Adeleke for his patience, encouragement and support in making this study possible. The Water Research Commission (WRC) of South Africa (K5/2347//3), the Agricultural Research Council – Professional Development Programme (ARC-PDP) and the North-West University post graduate (PUK-bursary) for financing this study. Dr. Jaco Bezuidenhout for his assistance with the statistical analysis of this study. Dr. Anine Jordaan for her assistance with the Transmission Electron Microscopy analysis of this study. Dr. Charlotte Mienie for her assistance with any molecular method queries. Dr. Juan Jofre for providing positive control viruses for the molecular analysis of this study. Dr. Lesego Molale for her assistance in content editing and always having answers to all my many questions. For the WRC research group of (2015) for the shared physico-chemical analyses (Alewyn, Mzy, Adele, Janita, Rohan, Vivienne, Carla, Maxi, Roelof, Tamryn, Magnus, and Karoline) My parents Chris and Trudi Bothma for their prayers, love, emotional and financial support as well as believing in me always.
    [Show full text]