DOCSLIB.ORG

Frances Baard District Municipality: Proposed Upgrading of an Anglo Boer War Blockhouse on a Portion of Warrenton Erf 1, Warrenton, Northern Cape Province

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Frances Baard District Municipality: Proposed Upgrading of an Anglo Boer War Blockhouse on a Portion of Warrenton Erf 1, Warrenton, Northern Cape Province FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY: PROPOSED UPGRADING OF AN ANGLO BOER WAR BLOCKHOUSE ON A PORTION OF WARRENTON ERF 1, WARRENTON, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Archaeological Impact Assessment Prepared for: Frances Baard District Municipality Prepared by: Exigo Sustainability -i- Firefly Investments 224: Platinum Solar Park Project Archaeological Impact Assessment Report HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON A PORTION OF WARRENTON ERF 1 FOR THE PROPOSED UPGRADING OF AN ANGLO BOER WAR BLOCKHOUSE, WARRENTON, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Conducted on behalf of: Frances Baard District Municipality Exigo Sustainability Compiled by: Nelius Kruger (BA, BA Hons. Archaeology Pret.) Reviewed by: Joh-ne Jansen (Frances Baard District Municipality) Document History Document Version 1 (Draft) – 25 March 2016 -i- Firefly Investments 224: Platinum Solar Park Project Archaeological Impact Assessment Report Although Exigo Sustainability exercises due care and diligence in rendering services and preparing documents, Exigo Sustainability accepts no liability, and the client, by receiving this document, indemnifies Exigo Sustainability and its directors, managers, agents and employees against all actions, claims, demands, losses, liabilities, costs, damages and expenses arising from or in connection with services rendered, directly or indirectly by Exigo Sustainability and by the use of the information contained in this document. This document contains confidential and proprietary information equally shared between Exigo Sustainability. and Frances Baard District Municipality, and is protected by copyright in favour of these companies and may not be reproduced, or used without the written consent of these companies, which has been obtained beforehand. This document is prepared exclusively for Frances Baard District Municipality and is subject to all confidentiality, copyright and trade secrets, rules, intellectual property law and practices of South Africa. Exigo Sustainability promotes the conservation of sensitive archaeological and heritage resources and therefore uncompromisingly adheres to relevant Heritage Legislation (National Heritage Resources Act no. 25 of 1999, Human Tissue Act 65 of 1983 as amended, Removal of Graves and Dead Bodies Ordinance no. 7 of 1925, Excavations Ordinance no. 12 of 1980). In order to ensure best practices and ethics in the examination, conservation and mitigation of archaeological and heritage resources, Exigo Sustainability follows the Minimum Standards: Archaeological and Palaeontological Components of Impact Assessment as set out by the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) and the CRM section of the Association for South African Professional Archaeologists (ASAPA). -ii- Frances Baard District Municipality: Warrenton Blockhouse Restoration Heritage Impact Assessment Report DECLARATION I, Nelius Le Roux Kruger, declare that – I act as the independent specialist; I am conducting any work and activity relating to the proposed Warrenton Blockhouse Restoration Project in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the client; I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; I have the required expertise in conducting the specialist report and I will comply with legislation, including the relevant Heritage Legislation (National Heritage Resources Act no. 25 of 1999, Human Tissue Act 65 of 1983 as amended, Removal of Graves and Dead Bodies Ordinance no. 7 of 1925, Excavations Ordinance no. 12 of 1980), the Minimum Standards: Archaeological and Palaeontological Components of Impact Assessment (SAHRA, AMAFA and the CRM section of ASAPA), regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity; I have not, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing - any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority; and - the objectivity of any report, plan or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority; All the particulars furnished by me in this declaration are true and correct. ___________________________________ Signature of specialist Company: Exigo Sustainability Date: 25 March 2016 -3- Frances Baard District Municipality: Warrenton Blockhouse Restoration Heritage Impact Assessment Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report details the results of an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) study for the proposed Warrenton Blockhouse Restoration Project on a portion of Erf1 at the Warrenton Cultural Resort in the Frances Baard District Municipality, Northern Cape Province. The AIA was conducted subject to requirements as set out by the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998), the National Heritage Resources Act (NHRA - Act 25 of 1999). The report includes background information on the area’s archaeology, its representation in southern Africa, and the history of the larger area under investigation, survey methodology and results as well as heritage legislation and conservation policies. A copy of the report will be supplied to the provincial heritage agency (Northern Cape-PHRA) and recommendations contained in this document will be reviewed. A number of archaeological and historical studies have been conducted in the region around the Ghaap Plateau and Warrenton and many of these studies infer a varied heritage landscape. The general landscape around the project area is primarily well known for hominin heritage but sites dating to Anglo-Boer War are most also prevalent. As a remnant of this War, the Warrenton blockhouse is a protected heritage resource and a declared a National Monument in 1992. As such, the structure is of high heritage significance due to its scientific value, architectural attributers and general association with the Anglo-Boer War history of South Africa. The following recommendations are made based on the significance of the site, pertaining to the proposed Warrenton Blockhouse Upgrade Project. - As noted above, the Warrenton blockhouse (Site Exigo-WBH-ST01: S28.092168° E 24.871036°) is a heritage resource of high heritage significance and the upgrade of the resource will add to the conservation of the historical fabric of the site. For this upgrade process it is recommended that as much of the structure be retain in its original state. Collapsed sections should be restored to resemble the original appearance of the building, according to historiographical information. It is essential that a qualified heritage architect provide input on the restoration in terms of materials used, structural integrity and historical accuracy. It is further recommended that original materials, such as stones from collapsed sections, be used as far as possible for the project. A heritage conservation buffer zone of at least 20m should be implemented around the heritage resource, the existing fence should be upgraded and access control should be applied during the project and after completion. It should be noted that the restoration of the structures for this purpose will be subject to the application of a destruction / alteration permit and approval of the relevant heritage agency. - It is recommended that project planning assistance by Heritage Architect be provided in order to retain historical integrity of existing and upgraded sections of the structure. Monitoring of the project by the Heritage Architects, as well as regular examination of the site, possible trenches and excavations in order to detect and preserve previously undocumented heritage receptors. - A site management plan for the conservation of the heritage resource during construction and conservation phases of the project should be compiled and implemented a a qualified heritage practitioner. - Should any historical midden at the site are to be impacted by digging of trenches or any surface or subsurface earth moving a Phase 2 Specialist Study should be conducted. Such a study should carefully document these features by means of site sampling, artefacts analysis as well as site mapping and site surveying, a photographic record, and a desktop and archive study. This measure is subject to excavation and destruction permitting requirements, if and when required. -4- Frances Baard District Municipality: Warrenton Blockhouse Restoration Heritage Impact Assessment Report - Considering the localised nature of heritage remains, the general monitoring of the upgrade progress by an informed ECO or by the heritage specialist is recommended for all stages of the project. This should involve the inspection of the site on regular basis in order to monitor possible impact on previously undetected heritage resources. Should any subsurface palaeontological, archaeological or historical material or burials be exposed during construction activities, all activities should be suspended and the archaeological specialist should be notified immediately. Generally, it is essential that cognisance be taken of the larger archaeological landscape of the area in order to avoid the destruction of previously undetected heritage sites. - It should be noted that mitigation measures are valid for the duration of the development process, and mitigation measures might have to be implemented on additional features of heritage importance not detected during this Phase 1 assessment (e.g. uncovered
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Provincial Gazette Igazethi Yephondo Kasete Ya Profensi Provinsiale Koerant NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
    NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE PROFENSI YA KAPA-BOKONE NOORD-KAAP PROVINSIE IPHONDO LOMNTLA KOLONI EXTRAORDINARY • BUITENGEWOON Provincial Gazette iGazethi YePhondo Kasete ya Profensi Provinsiale Koerant JULY Vol. 22 KIMBERLEY, 20 JULIE 2015 No. 1913 We oil Irawm he power to pment kiIDc AIDS HElPl1NE 0800 012 322 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Prevention is the cure N.B. The Government Printing Works will ISSN 1682-4549 not be held responsible for the quality of 01913 “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 9 771682 454009 2 No. 1913 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE, EXTRAORDINARY, 20 JULY 2015 IMPORTANT I nfarmai,o-w from Government Printing Works Dear Valued Customers, Government Printing Works has implemented rules for completing and submitting the electronic Adobe Forms when you, the customer, submits your notice request. Please take note of these guidelines when completing your form. GPW Business Rules 1. No hand written notices will be accepted for processing, this includes Adobe ,-..,. forms which have been completed by hand. 2. Notices can only be submitted in Adobe electronic form format to the email submission address submit.egazette @gpw.gov.za. This means that any notice submissions not on an Adobe electronic form that are submitted to this mailbox will be rejected. National or Provincial gazette notices, where the Z95 or Z95Prov must be an Adobe form but the notice content (body) will be an attachment. 3. Notices brought into GPW by "walk -in" customers on electronic media can only be submitted in Adobe electronic form format. This means that any notice submissions not on an Adobe electronic form that are submitted by the customer on electronic media will be rejected.
    [Show full text]
  • Ganspan Draft Archaeological Impact Assessment Report
    CES: PROPOSED GANSPAN-PAN WETLAND RESERVE DEVELOPMENT ON ERF 357 OF VAALHARTS SETTLEMENT B IN THE PHOKWANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Archaeological Impact Assessment Prepared for: CES Prepared by: Exigo Sustainability ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (AIA) ON ERF 357 OF VAALHARTS SETTLEMENT B FOR THE PROPOSED GANSPAN-PAN WETLAND RESERVE DEVELOPMENT, FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Conducted for: CES Compiled by: Nelius Kruger (BA, BA Hons. Archaeology Pret.) Reviewed by: Roberto Almanza (CES) DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST Name Institution Roberto Almanza CES DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Version Status 12 August 2019 1.0 Draft 26 August 2019 2.0 Final 3 CES: Ganspan-pan Wetland Reserve Development Archaeological Impact Assessment Report DECLARATION I, Nelius Le Roux Kruger, declare that – • I act as the independent specialist; • I am conducting any work and activity relating to the proposed Ganspan-Pan Wetland Reserve Development in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the client; • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; • I have the required expertise in conducting the specialist report and I will comply with legislation, including the relevant Heritage Legislation (National Heritage Resources Act no. 25 of 1999, Human Tissue Act 65 of 1983 as amended, Removal of Graves and Dead Bodies Ordinance no. 7 of 1925, Excavations Ordinance no. 12 of 1980), the
    [Show full text]
  • Wood 2 & 3 Solar Energy Facilities
    Bind aan Rugkant van A4 Dokument Lourens G van Zyl (Mobile) +27 (0)76 371 1151 WELCOME WOOD 2 & 3 SOLAR ENERGY FACILITIES (Website) www.terragis.co.za (Email) [email protected] Locality Map 21°30'0"E 22°0'0"E 22°30'0"E 23°0'0"E 23°30'0"E 24°0'0"E 24°30'0"E 25°0'0"E ! R S " - 0 e K P 1 ! 2 1 l h Tlakgameng 3 go 0 o k e 0 0 g gole kgole p 7 ' 0 k o go T 7 Atamelang g a 0 0 K 0 K n l ! 0 e a 3 0 p ! 0 Geysdorp 0 Stella ° 0 e e 0 ! R 0 n n 6 g 0 0 5 g a 2 0 n Ganyesa 0 e ! s 7 a w o h a s p o s a M e R3 h Molop o y 77 Mo n P s a h aweng ! G R 3 78 t ui L pr olwa us nen ee Van g L 0 8 Zylsrust 3 ! M Moseohatshe R ! t a i t u l Ditshipeng r h p o ! s S Vryburg t t " R31 s ! D ie S H " 0 h R r ' a L sase o o 0 n a e ' 0 s e e r a 0 ° t s n s o ° 7 a M tlh arin g Bothithong L n w g e 7 2 Kuruma K ! Tsineng o 6 2 r u ! K s 0 r or D t R a u o 5 m n bel r 34 a M a -3000000 r a -30000R00 a o M H g s K o o a h robela Wentzel a M tl Ko - hw Lo it ro Schweizer g w b Dam a Ga Mopedi a u e ! ri ob r la ! ng ate e p G s 9 n e reneke lw 4 Amalia g o kane ! s R t M W ro 4 Har Wit M a 50 lee a R g n Ma t y t e e lh d w g in a n Mothibistad g rin udum o 0 ! g Pudimoe P G 8 g ! 3 ! n e a Kuruman i G M t - R d S ! l M a " Bodulong o e - a S V M e o K " h y m 0 l n e a ' s g u a r n a ng y 0 n s e n ' a m n 0 r a o a um e k o 0 r u 6 3 a s p T im a is n M 0 3 ° e l o h e a Manthestad 5 ° 7 o p e Reivilo R372 ! ! R g 7 2 D e R ! h DibG eng R t 37 B e 2 lu 2 s ! 3 4 e Taung t a 8 1 P a - o 0 N ol M m 1 M o 7 - g 3 ! a a Kathu R r ! G a e Phok a n Dingleton
    [Show full text]
  • Phokwane Local Municipality
    PHOKWANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2007-2011 SECOND PHASE OF A DEVELOPMENTAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS IDP: Integrated Development Plan EPWP: Extended Public Works Program PMS: Performance Management System CDW: Community Development Worker MSM OF 1998: Municipal Structures Act of 1998 FBS: Free Basic Services MSM OF 2000: Municipal Systems Act of 2000 NGO: Non-Governmental Organization LED: Local Economic Development CBO: Community Based Organization MIG: Municipal Infrastructure Grant MFMA of 2003: Municipal Finance Management DME: Department of Minerals Energy Act of 2003 DEAT: Department of Environmental Affairs & RSA: Republic of South Africa Tourism WC: Ward Committee DOA: Department of Agriculture COC: Code of Conduct DLA: Department of Land Affairs LG: Local Government IT: Information Technology GIS: Geographic Information Systems MDG: Millennium Development Goal DLG&H: Department of Local Government & Housing FBDM: Frances Baard District Municipality DCTEA: Department of Conservation, Tourism, Environmental Affairs 2 FOREWORD BY THE MAYOR: Hon. Vuyisile Khen It is indeed both a pledge and honour that this sphere of government, which is at the coalface of service delivery, is entering its second phase of developmental local government. We do the latter with acknowledgement of the challenges we still face ahead, the ones we could not deal with in the first term given our limitation in terms of resources. We are mindful of the millennium goals targets in terms of provision of basic services coupled with the PGDS we need to reach, and we are ready and prepared to deliver with assistance from our sector departments. We further bank on our partnership with private through their investment which aims at creating employment opportunities and growing the local economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Vitality of Urban Centres
    The Sustainable World 15 Determining the vitality of urban centres J. E. Drewes & M. van Aswegen North West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa Abstract This paper will attempt to provide an encompassing Index of Vitality for urban centres. The Vitality Index’s© goal is to enable measurement of the general economic, social, physical, environmental, institutional and spatial performance of towns within a regional framework, ultimately reflecting the spatial importance of the urban centre. Towns have been measured in terms of numerous indicators, mostly in connection with social and economic conditions, over an extended period of time. The lack of suitable spatial indicators is identified as a significant shortcoming in the measurement of urban centres. This paper proposes the utilisation of a comprehensive index to measure the importance of an urban centre within a specific region. The Vitality Index© is consequently tested in a study area situated in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa. This study contributes in a number of ways to the measurement of urban centres, i.e. the shortcomings that are identified for the urban centres can be addressed by goal-specific policy initiatives, comprising a set of objectives and strategies to correct imbalances. The Vitality Index© also provides a basis for guiding national and regional growth policies, in the identification of urban centres with sustainable growth potential and vitality. Keywords: sustainability indicators, measuring urban centres, importance of urban centres, sustainable housing, spatial planning; policy, South Africa. 1 Introduction Various indicators have been designed and are recognised to provide a quantitative evaluation of an urban centre. Included are indicators describing economic growth, accessibility, sustainability, quality of life and environmental quality.
    [Show full text]
  • SIBU and the Crisis of Water Service Delivery in Sannieshof, North West Province
    SIBU and the crisis of water service delivery in Sannieshof, North West Province C GOUWS, I MOEKETSI, S MOTLOUNG, J TEMPELHOFF, G VAN GREUNING AND L VAN ZYL* Abstract In 2007 the residents of the town of Sannieshof in North West Province declared a dispute with the Tswaing Local Municipality on the grounds that the state of local service delivery left much to be desired. The ratepayers then formed the Sannieshof Inwoners Belastingbetalers Unie (SIBU) which literally took over the functions of local government of the town, functioning as a local government within a local government. This article provides a historical narrative of the conflict between SIBU and Tswaing Local Municipality, a dispute which was taken as far as the provincial High Court. Then follows an outline of conditions in Sannieshof and the townships of Agisanang and Phelindaba. Attention is given to the perceptions of local residents on the prevalent conditions, specifically in respect of water supply and sanitation service delivery. In the third section there are some theoretical perspectives on political culture, socialisation and happiness. A debate is provided on how these phenomena manifest under existing conditions in Sannieshof, and more particularly, in its adjacent townships of Agisanang and Phelindaba. Keywords: Sannieshof Inwoners Belastingbetalers Unie (SIBU), North West Province, service delivery, water supply, sanitation, Tswaing Local Municipality. Disciplines: History, Political Science, Tourism Studies and Public Management and Administration, Industrial Psychology and Wellness Studies. Introduction In November 2007, irate ratepayers of the towns Sannieshof, Ottosdal and Delareyville in South Africa’s North West Province, declared a dispute with Tswaing Local Municipality, the local authority responsible for their municipal services.1 Using the Municipal Finance (Management) Act, 56 of 2003,2 the Municipal Structures Act, 117 of 1998,3 and the Municipal Systems Act, 32 * Research Niche Area for the Cultural Dynamics of Water (CuDyWat).
    [Show full text]
  • Frances Baard District
    09/52 FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT NORTHERN CAPE The area is known as the Vaalharts Irrigation Scheme in the France Baard District is the largest irrigation scheme in South Africa. 2 PROFILE: FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT PROFILE: FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT 3 CONTENT 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 6 2. Frances Baard District Overview ...................................................................... 7 2.1 Historical Perspective ............................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Location ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Dikgatlong Local Municipality ........................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Sol Plaatje Local Municipality ............................................................................................ 8 2.2.3 Phokwane Local Municipality ............................................................................................ 8 2.2.4 Magareng Local Municipality ............................................................................................ 8 2.3 Spatial Status ......................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Land Ownership ..................................................................................................................... 9 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeontological Impact Assessment May Be Significantly Enhanced Through Field Assessment by a Professional Palaeontologist
    PALAEONTOLOGICAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT: COMBINED DESKTOP & FIELD- BASED STUDY Proposed Meerkat Solar Power Plant on Portion 3 (Portion of Portion 2) of the Farm Vyflings Pan 598 near Vryburg, Naledi Local Municipality, North-West Province John E. Almond PhD (Cantab.) Natura Viva cc, PO Box 12410 Mill Street, Cape Town 8010, RSA [email protected] February 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The company Meerkat Solar Power Plant (RF) (Pty) Ltd is proposing to develop up to 115 MW photovoltaic solar facility, known as the Meerkat Solar Power Plant, on Portion 3 (Portion of Portion 2) of the Farm Vyflings Pan 598, IN Registration Division, Province of the North-West. The Meerkat Solar Power Plant study area is entirely underlain by late Archaean (c. 2.6 billion year-old) sedimentary rocks of the Schmidtsdrif Subgroup (Ghaap Group, Transvaal Supergroup). These mainly comprise shallow marine siliciclastic sediments and possible lavas of the Vryburg Formation plus carbonate sediments of the Boomplaas Formation. Field assessment suggests that stromatolite-bearing carbonate rocks are not present at surface within the Vryburg and Bomplaas Formation outcrop areas in the study area. The overlying superficial sediments (e.g. sandy soils, calcretised pan deposits) are of low palaeontological sensitivity. It is concluded that, with or without mitigation, the overall impact of the proposed Meerkat Solar Power Plant on Farm Vyflings Pan 598 is of NEGATIVE LOW SIGNIFICANCE in palaeontological heritage terms. Should significant fossil remains - such as well-preserved stromatolites - be exposed during construction, the responsible Environmental Control Officer should safeguard these, preferably in situ. The South African Heritage Resources Authority (SAHRA) should be alerted as soon as possible (Contact details: Mrs Colette Scheermeyer, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Northern Cape Province
    Section B:Section Profile B:Northern District HealthCape Province Profiles 14 Northern Cape Province John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality (DC45) Overview of the district The John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipalitya (previously Kgalagadi) is a Category C municipality located in the north of the Northern Cape Province, bordering Botswana in the west. It comprises the three local municipalities of Gamagara, Ga- Segonyana and Joe Morolong, and 186 towns and settlements, of which the majority (80%) are villages. The boundaries of this district were demarcated in 2006 to include the once north-western part of Joe Morolong and Olifantshoek, along with its surrounds, into the Gamagara Local Municipality. It has an established rail network from Sishen South and between Black Rock and Dibeng. It is characterised by a mixture of land uses, of which agriculture and mining are dominant. The district holds potential as a viable tourist destination and has numerous growth opportunities in the industrial sector. Area: 27 322km² Population (2016)b: 238 306 Population density (2016): 8.7 persons per km2 Estimated medical scheme coverage: 14.5% Cities/Towns: Bankhara-Bodulong, Deben, Hotazel, Kathu, Kuruman, Mothibistad, Olifantshoek, Santoy, Van Zylsrus. Main Economic Sectors: Agriculture, mining, retail. Population distribution, local municipality boundaries and health facility locations Source: Mid-Year Population Estimates 2016, Stats SA. a The Local Government Handbook South Africa 2017. A complete guide to municipalities in South Africa. Seventh
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Update Harts River 2017.Pdf
    2017 NOTE Present Project: Prospecting Rights still held or applied for. Historic Project: This refers to the areas and work completed on the entire Project from day one. Introduction The historic target area covered a large area held under six (6) different Prospecting Rights which were applied for sequentially as more information on the deposit became available (Historic Project). The obtaining of such a large area was necessary as there are often large variations in the nature and potential of these alluvial deposits. Some drilling was done on most of these Prospecting Right areas (areas consist of one to several farms with different land owners) and the areas of higher potential were kept (Documented under the heading Present Project). It is necessary to include the results of the work done on the Historic Project, which includes the three (3) Rights held at present, as the work done outside the Present Project speaks to the potential of the Present Project and because the major portion of the test mining was done on the farm Zamenkomst (outside Present Project). On Zamenkomst only a small portion of the good gravel was preserved and mined out (Prospecting Right terminated). At the time, when this test mining was carried out, no other Prospecting Rights were available and the contractors moved else ware. It is important to note that all Test Mining was carried out with no cost to the “Company” (Contractors sold the Diamonds for their account and only the data and results of the Test Mining was retained by the “Company”). The only costs carried by the “Company” was Drilling and Salaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 36740 16-8 Road Carrier Permits
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA August Vol. 578 Pretoria, 16 2013 Augustus No. 36740 PART 1 OF 2 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 303563—A 36740—1 2 No. 36740 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 16 AUGUST 2013 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the senderʼs respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS INHOUD Page Gazette Bladsy Koerant No. No. No. No. No. No. Transport, Department of Vervoer, Departement van Cross Border Road Transport Agency: Oorgrenspadvervoeragentskap aansoek- Applications for permits:.......................... permitte: .................................................. Menlyn..................................................... 3 36740 Menlyn..................................................... 3 36740 Applications concerning Operating Aansoeke
    [Show full text]