DOCSLIB.ORG

Free State Region River Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Free State Region River Systems 6 FREE STATE REGION TT RR OO RIVER SYSTEMS - 2003 PP EE RR SS RR EE VV II R -R FF O -O EE TT AA Caledon River TT SS High flows in the Orange River downstream of Vanderkloof Dam Modder River River Health Programme Context of this Report Contents The River Health Programme 2 Contributing Indices and Categories 4 Organisations This report is based on the findings of surveys of river systems in History of the Free State 6 the central region of South Africa. These surveys, which took The River Health Programme in the Free State 8 Department of Water Affairs and place from 2000 to 2003, were part of the implementation of the Forestry (DWAF) Organisational Arrangements 10 River Health Programme in the Free State and Northern Cape. Department of Environmental Affairs Overview of the Study Area 12 and Tourism (DEAT) Signatures of River Biodiversity 15 Water Research Commission (WRC) The surveys extended beyond provincial boundaries to certain Ecoregion Characteristics 16 Department of Tourism, Environmental and adjoining sub-ccatchments of the Orange-VVaal system. An SUMMARY 18 Economic Affairs - Free State (DTEEA) exception is the southern Gauteng catchment. These highly- SUMMARY (CONTINUED) 20 University of Free State, Centre for Environmental Management (CEM) polluted streams are the subject of a separate study (see the River Upper Vaal Catchment 22 Bloem Water Health Programme poster, Ecological State of Southern Gauteng Vaal, Harts & Skoonspruit Catchments 24 Rand Water Rivers). Vals & Renoster Catchments 26 Sedibeng Water Sand & Vet Catchments 28 CSIR Environmentek This report describes in some detail the organisational partnerships Modder & Riet Catchments 30 that have driven and sustained river biomonitoring activities at the Orange, Caledon & Kraai Catchments 32 provincial level since 1996. The Free State team relies heavily on Contributors Water Quality and Algae 34 shared responsibility and effective partnerships to achieve river Vleis & Pans 36 health objectives for all major rivers across a very large study area. Marinda Avenant Glossary 38 Organisational networking and collaboration are gaining importance Charles Barker Further Reading 39 Nacelle Collins as we move towards more devolved and co-ooperative river resource Pierre de Villiers Highlights, Challenges & Opportunities 40 Johann du Preez management, and this document includes an assessment of how Willem Grobler Thomas Gyedu-Ababio organisational arrangements support joint river health goals. Ntombi Hoohlo Cebo Mhlongo Israel Ngakantsi Jan Roos Maitland Seaman Charles Sekwele Mike Silberbauer Jurgen Streit Wilma Strydom Stephan van der Walt Ernita van Wyk Gerda Venter Dineke Vink Marie Watson Suggested citation: River Health Programme (2003). State-of-Rivers Report: Free State Reviewers: Region River Systems. Pete Ashton Department of Water Affairs and Forestry John Dini Pretoria Liesl Hill Neels Kleynhans ISBN No: 0-620-31794-9 Uli Looser Bonani Madikizela Harrison Pienaar Rudi Pretorius Dirk Roux Christa Thirion MARCH 2004 The River Health Programme In 1994, DWAF launched the River Health Programme (RHP) to gather information on the health State-oof-RRivers Reporting of South Africa's river systems. Background Continuous monitoring of our river The central objective of South Africa's State-of-Rivers (SoR) reports are a systems and State-of-River reports on water policy is the equitable, efficient component of State of the Environment changes in their health, track our and sustainable use of our water (SOE) reporting, promoted at the United The Department of Water Affairs progress toward river health goals. resources. The National Water Act Nations Conference on Environment & (NWA), Act 36 of 1998, recognises that Development (UNCED) in Rio de and Forestry (DWAF) is the The RHP has built on the SOE experience Although DWAF guides the RHP, the the best way to achieve this is to Janeiro in 1992, as an improved source custodian of all water resources and has developed methods for programme is a co-operative venture manage aquatic ecosystems (including of environmental information for providing information on the in South Africa. This makes with participants from many government rivers) at the catchment scale and decision-making. ecoqlogical state of rivers to help with DWAF responsible for the care and non-government organisations: through joint participation by all inter- environmental decision-making. The DEAT, WRC, DWAF Regions, provincial ested parties. The RHP supports this The NEMA is currently being revised to and management of water SoR process monitors rivers, then government departments, universities, management process by providing the include, amongst other amendments, a resources to ensure sustainable packages and disseminates infor- conservation agencies, private sector river health information needed by requirement for formal State of the social and economic devel- mation on river health to managers organisations, etc. managers and the participating public Environment assessment and reporting. and decision-makers. In this way, the opment. to make decisions. SOE reports RHP provides ecologically sound A river's ability to continue providing - provide information for better decision- management information while also informing and educating people goods and services depends on making regarding sustainable devel- about the health and importance of informed and effective river opment their rivers. State of Environment reports management. The requirements for - compare environmental performances sustainable use and development of of different areas answer questions such as: rivers include an understanding of river River Health information appears in an - increase public awareness of health, knowledge of the causes of accessible report format (such as this environment and development issues - What changes are taking place deterioration, and information about document) or in a more condensed in the condition and functioning areas of sustained utilisation and - empower individuals and organisations poster form. Eventually the RHP will unacceptable deterioration. This to improve their environment and cover all South Africa's major river of the environment? knowledge is required to set goals and quality of life for themselves and future systems. The RHP will also revisit rivers to decide on management actions to generations periodically in order to provide infor- - What is causing these changes? achieve desired river health states. mation on long-term trends in the SOE reports use the 'Driving-Force- health of river systems. - What are the consequences of Pressure-State-Impact-Response' framework. This describes the human This report is the sixth in the State-of- these changes? RHP activities and outputs are strongly activities which create pressures on the Rivers series. Previous reports and aligned with national legislation, because environment, the current state and more information can be found on - What is our response and are the NWA requires the estabishment of trends in environmental conditions, the the RHP web page our actions effective? monitoring systems including the consequences for sustainability and http://www.csir.co.za/rhp/. monitoring of aquatic ecosystem health. human livelihoods, and the policies and - What more can we do to improve The RHP monitoring results, in turn, actions in place to manage the the environment including river support other legal principles contained environment. This way of presenting health and, therefore, the quality in the National Water Act and the information is comprehensive and easy National Environmental Management to understand, especially if specific and flow of aquatic goods and Act (NEMA), Act 107 0f 1998. For indicators are used to measure changes services from which people example, RHP results provide evidence of in pressures, states and responses. benefit? environmental degradation where this may occur. 2 3 Indices and Categories What are River Health Method used to categorise the study area. More details on the Each of the river health categories Indices? ecoregion classification system can be (below) is associated with a level of our rivers found on p 16. ecosystem health. The ecosystem health South African Scoring is linked to the potential of a river system Many physical, chemical and System (SASS) Once river health indices are measured, The results obtained by applying the to offer a particular range of goods and biological factors influence river they need to be interpreted within a biological and habitat indices during services. A ‘fair’ or ‘poor’ river may have ecosystem health, e.g. geomor- Geomorphological Aquatic invertebrates (e.g. insects, framework that allows comparison of river surveys provide the information lost its potential for most of the uses, e.g. mussels, snails, crabs, worms) require that determines the health of the river. tourism, conservation and even phology, hydrological and Index (GI) the health of monitoring sites and even agriculture. It might, however be hydraulic regimes, water quality, specific habitats and water quality condi- river systems. An ecoregion classification For standardisation purposes that will tions for at least part of their life cycle. system was used to delineate ecological also allow for comparison of the health acceptable for a river to be ‘fair’ if a Geomorphological processes determine in-stream and riparian habitats Changes in invertebrate community boundaries that allow grouping and of different river systems, a river health higher socio-economic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strongylopus Hymenopus (Boulenger, 1920) (Anura: Pyxicephalidae)
    A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AMIETIA VERTEBRALIS (HEWITT, 1927) AND STRONGYLOPUS HYMENOPUS (BOULENGER, 1920) (ANURA: PYXICEPHALIDAE) Jeanne Berkeljon A dissertation submitted in partial fuIJilment of the requirementsfor the degree of Master of Environmental Science North- West University (Potchefitroom campus) Supervisor: Prof Louis du Preez (North-West University) Co-supervisor: Dr Michael Cunningham (University of the Free State) November 2007 Walk away quietly in any direction and taste the fieedom of the mountaineer... Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares drop ofSlike autumn leaves. John Muir (1838 - 1914) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII 1.1 Background 1 1.2 A review of the literature 3 1.2.2 Taxonomic history of the Aquatic River Frog, Amietia vertebralis 3 1.2.3 Taxonomic history of the Berg Stream Frog, 7 Strongylopus hymenopus 7 1.3 Research aims and objectives 9 2.1 Study area 2.1.1 Lesotho and the Drakensberg Mountains 2.2 Species Description 2.2.1 Description of the Aquatic River Frog, Amietia vertebralis 2.2.2 Description of the Berg Stream Frog, Strongylopus hymenopus 2.3 Species Distribution 2.3.1 Distribution of Amietia vertebralis 2.3.2 Distribution of Strongylopus hymenopus 2.4 Conservation status 2.5 General Methods 2.5.1 Fieldwork 2.5.2 Morphometrics 2.5.3 Molecular analysis CHAPTER3 : MORPHOMETRICASSESSMENT OF AMETIA VERTEBRALIS AND STRONGYLOPUSHYMENOPUS 33 3.1 Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Fish and Fisheries in Impoundments in the Upper Orange-Senqu River Basin and Lower Vaal River Basin
    AN ASSESSMENT OF FISH AND FISHERIES IN IMPOUNDMENTS IN THE UPPER ORANGE-SENQU RIVER BASIN AND LOWER VAAL RIVER BASIN Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements in respect of the Doctoral Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Zoology and Entomology in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences at the University of the Free State by LEON MARTIN BARKHUIZEN 1 July 2015 Promoters: Prof. O.L.F. Weyl and Prof. J.G. van As Table of contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ vi Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. ix List of tables ....................................................................................................................................... xii List of figures ....................................................................................................................................... xv List of some acronyms used in text .................................................................................................. xviii Chapter 1 General introduction and thesis outline ...................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 General Literature Review ........................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ganspan Draft Archaeological Impact Assessment Report
    CES: PROPOSED GANSPAN-PAN WETLAND RESERVE DEVELOPMENT ON ERF 357 OF VAALHARTS SETTLEMENT B IN THE PHOKWANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Archaeological Impact Assessment Prepared for: CES Prepared by: Exigo Sustainability ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (AIA) ON ERF 357 OF VAALHARTS SETTLEMENT B FOR THE PROPOSED GANSPAN-PAN WETLAND RESERVE DEVELOPMENT, FRANCES BAARD DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Conducted for: CES Compiled by: Nelius Kruger (BA, BA Hons. Archaeology Pret.) Reviewed by: Roberto Almanza (CES) DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST Name Institution Roberto Almanza CES DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Version Status 12 August 2019 1.0 Draft 26 August 2019 2.0 Final 3 CES: Ganspan-pan Wetland Reserve Development Archaeological Impact Assessment Report DECLARATION I, Nelius Le Roux Kruger, declare that – • I act as the independent specialist; • I am conducting any work and activity relating to the proposed Ganspan-Pan Wetland Reserve Development in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the client; • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; • I have the required expertise in conducting the specialist report and I will comply with legislation, including the relevant Heritage Legislation (National Heritage Resources Act no. 25 of 1999, Human Tissue Act 65 of 1983 as amended, Removal of Graves and Dead Bodies Ordinance no. 7 of 1925, Excavations Ordinance no. 12 of 1980), the
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Report-Paul Roux
    Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment for proposed new 1.5 km-long underground sewerage pipeline in Paul Roux, Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality, Free State Province. Report prepared by Paleo Field Services PO Box 38806, Langenhovenpark 9330 16 / 02 / 2020 Summary A heritage impact assessment was carried for a proposed new 1.5 km-long underground sewerage pipeline in Paul Roux in the Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality, Free State Province. The study area is situated on the farm Farm Mary Ann 712, next to the N5 national road covering a section of the Sand River floodplain which is located on the eastern outskirts of Paul Roux . The proposed footprint is underlain by well-developed alluvial and geologically recent overbank sediments of the Sand River. Investigation of exposed alluvial cuttings next to the bridge crossing shows little evidence of intact Quaternary fossil remains. Potentially fossil-bearing Tarkastad Subgroup and younger Molteno Formation strata are exposed to the southwest of the study area. These outcrops will not be impacted by the proposed development. There are no major palaeontological grounds to suspend the proposed development. The study area consists for the most part of open grassland currently used for cattle grazing. The foot survey revealed little evidence of in situ Stone Age archaeological material, capped or distributed as surface scatters on the landscape. There are also no indications of rock art, prehistoric structures or other historical structures or buildings older than 60 years within the vicinity of the study area. A large cemetery is located directly west of the proposed footprint. The modern bridge construction at the Sand River crossing is not considered to be of historical significance.
    [Show full text]
  • UPPER VAAL WATER MANAGEMENT AREA (WMA No 8)
    Report Number: P WMA 08/000/00/0304 DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Directorate: National Water Resource Planning IInntteerrnnaall SSttrraatteeggiicc PPeerrssppeeccttiivvee UUppppeerr VVaaaall WWaateterr MMaannaaggeemmeenntt AArreeaa March 2004 Compiled by: W A T E R R E S O U R C E P L A N N I N G A N D C O N S E FC071R V A T I O N WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd, Reg. No. 98/16706/07 WRP_FC332 ISP : UPPER VAAL WMA _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Directorate National Water Resource Planning INTERNAL STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVE FOR THE UPPER VAAL WATER MANAGEMENT AREA (WMA No 8) APPROVAL Title : Upper Vaal Water Management Area: Internal Strategic Perspective DWAF Report No : P WMA 08/000/00/0304 Consultants : PDNA, WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd, WMB and Kwezi-V3 Report Status : Version 1 Version Controller : Mr Walther van der Westhuizen Date : March 2004 Approved for Consultants by: DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Directorate National Water Resource Planning Approved for Department of Water Affairs and Forestry by: ISP : UPPER VAAL WMA _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE This report is to be referred to in bibliographies as: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa. 2004. Upper Vaal Water Management Area: Internal Strategic Perspective. Prepared by PDNA, WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd, WMB and Kwezi-V3 on behalf of the Directorate: National Water Resource Planning. DWAF Report No P WMA 08/000/00/0304. INVITATION TO COMMENT This report will be updated on a regular basis until it is eventually superceded by the Catchment Management Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Status of Freshwater Fish Age Validation Studies and a Prioritization Framework for Further Research Jonathan J
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit -- Staff ubP lications Unit 2015 The Global Status of Freshwater Fish Age Validation Studies and a Prioritization Framework for Further Research Jonathan J. Spurgeon University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] Martin J. Hamel University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Kevin L. Pope U.S. Geological Survey—Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit,, [email protected] Mark A. Pegg University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ncfwrustaff Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Spurgeon, Jonathan J.; Hamel, Martin J.; Pope, Kevin L.; and Pegg, Mark A., "The Global Status of Freshwater Fish Age Validation Studies and a Prioritization Framework for Further Research" (2015). Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit -- Staff Publications. 203. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ncfwrustaff/203 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit -- Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 23:329–345, 2015 CopyrightO c Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 2330-8249 print / 2330-8257 online DOI: 10.1080/23308249.2015.1068737 The Global Status of Freshwater Fish Age Validation Studies and a Prioritization Framework for Further Research JONATHAN J.
    [Show full text]
  • SIBU and the Crisis of Water Service Delivery in Sannieshof, North West Province
    SIBU and the crisis of water service delivery in Sannieshof, North West Province C GOUWS, I MOEKETSI, S MOTLOUNG, J TEMPELHOFF, G VAN GREUNING AND L VAN ZYL* Abstract In 2007 the residents of the town of Sannieshof in North West Province declared a dispute with the Tswaing Local Municipality on the grounds that the state of local service delivery left much to be desired. The ratepayers then formed the Sannieshof Inwoners Belastingbetalers Unie (SIBU) which literally took over the functions of local government of the town, functioning as a local government within a local government. This article provides a historical narrative of the conflict between SIBU and Tswaing Local Municipality, a dispute which was taken as far as the provincial High Court. Then follows an outline of conditions in Sannieshof and the townships of Agisanang and Phelindaba. Attention is given to the perceptions of local residents on the prevalent conditions, specifically in respect of water supply and sanitation service delivery. In the third section there are some theoretical perspectives on political culture, socialisation and happiness. A debate is provided on how these phenomena manifest under existing conditions in Sannieshof, and more particularly, in its adjacent townships of Agisanang and Phelindaba. Keywords: Sannieshof Inwoners Belastingbetalers Unie (SIBU), North West Province, service delivery, water supply, sanitation, Tswaing Local Municipality. Disciplines: History, Political Science, Tourism Studies and Public Management and Administration, Industrial Psychology and Wellness Studies. Introduction In November 2007, irate ratepayers of the towns Sannieshof, Ottosdal and Delareyville in South Africa’s North West Province, declared a dispute with Tswaing Local Municipality, the local authority responsible for their municipal services.1 Using the Municipal Finance (Management) Act, 56 of 2003,2 the Municipal Structures Act, 117 of 1998,3 and the Municipal Systems Act, 32 * Research Niche Area for the Cultural Dynamics of Water (CuDyWat).
    [Show full text]
  • The Vaal River Inquiry Provisional Report
    Final Report of the Gauteng Provincial Inquiry Into the Sewage Problem of the Vaal River 17 February 2021 The Vaal Report Executive Summary The South African Human Rights Commission (‘the Commission’) had been alerted to online and print media reports, published during July and August 2018, reporting that raw sewage, from the Emfuleni Local Municipality (‘the Municipality’)’s Rietspruit Waste Water Care and Management Works situated in Vanderbijlpark, the Leewkuil Waste Water Care and Management Works situated in Vereeniging and other areas within the Municipality, had for weeks and months been leaking into and polluting the Vaal River and the Rietspruit. In addition to the raw sewage polluting major and essential bodies of water, the media reports stated, amongst other things, that: the main sewers in Vanderbijlpark were blocked and that raw sewerage was flowing into people’s yards and properties. In September 2018, in order to test the veracity of the media reports, the Commission’s Gauteng Provincial Office conducted an inspection-in-loco at certain sites within the Emfuleni Municipality, and observed: raw sewage flowing in a small stream that cut across the Emfuleni Golf Estate; two burst sewerage pipes on the banks of the Rietspruit that runs through the Emfuleni Municipal area; defective bio-filters at the Rietspruit Waste Water Treatment Works; a clogged sewerage manhole at the Sharpeville Cemetery and children swimming in, and consuming, polluted waters in the area of a school. Having established a prima facie violation of human rights in the Emfuleni Municipality, regarding the flowing of raw, untreated sewage flowing in the streets, homes, graveyards and also flowing into the Vaal River, the Dam, the Barrage and the Rietspruit (referred to collectively as ‘the Vaal’), and acting within its legislative mandate, the Commission established an Inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Governance and Collective Action
    5 HYDRO-HEGEMONY OR WATER SECURITY COMMUNITY? Collective action, cooperation and conflict in the SADC transboundary security complex Richard Meissner and Jeroen Warner Introduction After the Berlin Wall came down, the fragile Cold War equilibrium frayed. Dire Malthusian warnings of green wars, especially over water, in areas with high population pressures dominated the 1990s transboundary water literature. After Wolf (1995) showed that violent water conflict is extremely rare and cooperation the norm, attention started to shift to water cooperation and how to achieve it. In an anarchical global environment, the conflict potential of shared water resources has made rivers subject to high politics (i.e. security). While researchers and diplomats consider regional treaties as cooperation indicators (Wolf 1995), unequal treaties can also be sources of conflict (Warner and Zeitoun 2008). Inter- national regimes may institutionalize asymmetric power relations (Kistin 2011), and consequently constitute enmity instead of equity. According to Zeitoun and Warner (2006), the absence of war does not mean the absence of conflict or the presence of peace. Signing a treaty, or some form of cooperation over transboundary water, does not mean an end to conflict. Cooperation is not necessarily voluntary, while path dependency might also restrict the scope for resistance and change to existing interaction modes (Putnam 1993). While regime analysis deals with lengthening the ‘shadow of the future’ to create stable expecta- tions, Sebastian (2008) has noted the importance of the ‘shadow of the past’. Current state boundaries, cooperation habits, conflicts and frustrations over water in The Southern African Development Community (SADC) date back to colonial times.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Border Within: the Future of the Lesotho-South African International Boundary
    THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN MIGRATION PROJECT THE BORDER WITHIN: THE FUTURE OF THE LESOTHO-SOUTH AFRICAN INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY MIGRATION POLICY SERIES NO. 26 THE BORDER WITHIN: THE FUTURE OF THE LESOTHO-SOUTH AFRICAN INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY SECHABA CONSULTANTS AND ASSOCIATES SERIES EDITOR: PROF. JONATHAN CRUSH SOUTHERN AFRICAN MIGRATION PROJECT 2002 Published by Idasa, 6 Spin Street, Church Square, Cape Town, 8001, and Queen’s University, Canada. Copyright Southern African Migration Project (SAMP) 2002 ISBN 1-919798-41-2 First published 2002 Design by Bronwen Dachs Müller Typeset in Goudy All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission from the publishers. Bound and printed by Creda Communications, Cape Town CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 9 METHODOLOGY 11 DYNAMICS OF MOVEMENT BETWEEN LESOTHO AND THE RSA 12 MIGRATION PATTERNS TO SOUTH AFRICA 17 ATTITUDES TOWARDS SOUTH AFRICA 22 AT THE BORDER 26 BORDER CONTROL ISSUES 33 THE BUSINESS OF THE BORDER 38 CRIME ON THE BORDER 46 BILATERAL RELATIONS 49 TOURISM AND THE BORDER 54 TAXIS AND THE BORDER 55 BASOTHO FARM WORKERS 56 RECOMMENDATIONS 58 RESOURCES ON LESOTHO-SOUTH AFRICAN MIGRATION 62 ENDNOTES 63 MIGRATION POLICY SERIES 64 LIST OF TABLES PAGE TABLE 1: RECORDS OF BORDER CROSSING TO AND FROM COUNTRIES 14 AROUND SOUTH AFRICA TABLE 2: REPATRIATIONS OF BASOTHO FROM SOUTH AFRICA 15 TABLE 3: PERMIT OVERSTAYERS, 1998-2000 15 TABLE 4: NUMBER OF SESOTHO SPEAKERS BY PROVINCE 16 TABLE 5: PURPOSE OF ENTRY
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Plan V1.0 Free State Province Technical Report (FSDETEA/BPFS/2016 1.0)
    Biodiversity Plan v1.0 Free State Province Technical Report (FSDETEA/BPFS/2016_1.0) DRAFT 1 JUNE 2016 Map: Collins, N.B. 2015. Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: CBA map. Report Title: Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: Technical Report v1.0 Free State Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs. Internal Report. Date: $20 June 2016 ______________________________ Version: 1.0 Authors & contact details: Nacelle Collins Free State Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs [email protected] 051 4004775 082 4499012 Physical address: 34 Bojonala Buidling Markgraaf street Bloemfontein 9300 Postal address: Private Bag X20801 Bloemfontein 9300 Citation: Report: Collins, N.B. 2016. Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: Technical Report v1.0. Free State Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs. Internal Report. 1. Summary $what is a biodiversity plan This report contains the technical information that details the rationale and methods followed to produce the first terrestrial biodiversity plan for the Free State Province. Because of low confidence in the aquatic data that were available at the time of developing the plan, the aquatic component is not included herein and will be released as a separate report. The biodiversity plan was developed with cognisance of the requirements for the determination of bioregions and the preparation and publication of bioregional plans (DEAT, 2009). To this extent the two main products of this process are: • A map indicating the different terrestrial categories (Protected, Critical Biodiversity Areas, Ecological Support Areas, Other and Degraded) • Land-use guidelines for the above mentioned categories This plan represents the first attempt at collating all terrestrial biodiversity and ecological data into a single system from which it can be interrogated and assessed.
    [Show full text]