DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Metric Study Interim Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Metric Study Interim Report U.S. METRIC STUDY INTERIM REPORT COMMERCIAL WEIGHTS AND MEASURES U.S. METRIC STUDY MUM U.S. METRIC SUBSTUDY REPORTS The results of substudies of the U.S. Metric Study, while being evaluated for the preparation of a comprehensive report to the Congress, are being published in the interim as a series of NBS Special Publications. The titles of the individual reports are listed below. REPORTS ON SUBSTUDIES NBS SP345-1: International Standards (issued December 1970, SD Catalog No. C 13.1 0:345- price $1.25) 1 , NBS SP345-2: Federal Government: Civilian Agencies (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. C13. 10:345-2, price $2.25) NBS SP345-3: Commercial Weights and Measures (this publica- tion) NBS SP345-4: The Manufacturing Industry (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. CI 3. 10:345-4, price $1.25) NBS SP345-5 Nonmanufacturing Businesses (in press) NBS SP345-6 Education (in press) NBS SP345-7 The Consumer (in press) NBS SP345-8 International Trade (in press) NBS SP345-9 Department of Defense (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. C13. 10:345-9, price $1.25) NBS SP345-10: A History of the Metric System Controversy in the United States (in press) NBS SP345-1 1: Engineering Standards (issued July 1971, SD Cata- log No. C13. 10:345-1 1. Drice $2.00) NBS SP345-12: Testimony of Nationally Representative Groups (in press) COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON THE U.S. METRIC STUDY NBS SP345: To be published in August 1971 Those publications with catalog numbers have already been issued, and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 for the prices indicated. Add one- fourth of the purchase price if the publication ordered is to be sent to a foreign address. Be sure to include the SD Catalog number with your order. U.S. METRIC STUDY INTERIM REPORT COMMERCIAL WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Third in a series of reports prepared for the Congress U.S. METRIC STUDY Daniel V. De Simone, Director - (J, S ' National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 345-3 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Maurice H. Stans, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS Lewis M. Branscomb, Director Nat. Bur Stand. (U.S.), Spec. Publ. 345-3, 116 pages (July 1971) CODEN: XNBSA Issued July 1971 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington. D C. 20402 (Order by SD Catalog No. C 13.10:345-3). Price $1.00 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE HONORABLE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE THE HONORABLE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SIRS: I have the honor to present the third in the series of interim reports stemming from the U.S. Metric Study, prepared by the National Bureau of Standards. This Study was authorized by Public Law 90-472 to reduce the many un- certainties concerning the metric issue and to provide a better basis upon which the Congress may evaluate and resolve it. I shall make a final report to the Congress on this Study in August 1971. In the meantime, the data and opinions contained in this interim report are being evaluated by the Study team at the National Bureau of Standards. My final report to you will reflect this evaluation. Respectfully submitted, Secretary of Commerce Enclosure iii LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Honorable Maurice H. Stans Secretary of Commerce Dear Mr. Secretary: I have the honor to transmit to you another interim report of the U.S. Met- ric Study, which is being conducted at the National Bureau of Standards at your request and in accordance with the Metric Study Act of 1 968. The Study is exploring the subjects assigned to it with great care. We have tried to reach every relevant sector of the society to elicit their views on the metric issue and their estimates of the costs and benefits called for in the Metric Study Act. Moreover, all of these sectors were given an opportunity to testify in the extensive series of Metric Study Conferences that were held last year. On the basis of all that we have been able to learn from these conferences, as well as the numerous surveys and investigations, a final report will be made to you before August 1971 for your evaluation and decision as to any recommendations that you may wish to make to the Congress. The attached interim report includes data and other opinions that are still being evaluated by us to determine their relationship and significance to all of the other information that has been elicited by the Study. All of these evaluations will be reflected in the final report. Sincerely, Lewis M. Branscomb, Director National Bureau of Standards Enclosure IV . FOREWORD This report explores the probable effects of a metric changeover on com- mercial weights and measures activities. It primarily concerns two aspects of commercial weights and measures that would have to be dealt with in any metric changeover: (1) The cost of adapting or changing commercial weighing and measur- ing devices to record and/or indicate in metric units. (2) The effects of metrication on state and local weights and measures jurisdictions. Reports covering other substudies of the U.S. Metric Study are listed on the inside front cover. All of these, including this report, are under evalua- tion. Hence, they are published without prejudice to the comprehensive re- port on the entire U.S. Metric Study, which will be sent to the Congress by the Secretary of Commerce in August of 1 97 1 This report was prepared by Mr. Stephen L. Hatos of the Office of Weights and Measures, National Bureau of Standards. The Office of Weights and Measures is grateful for the contributions made by the Scale Manufacturers Association, the Gasoline Pump Manufacturers Association, the National Scale Men's Association, and the Task Force on Metrication of the National Conference on Weights and Measures. In this as in all aspects of the U.S. Metric Study, the program has benefited from the independent judgment and thoughtful counsel of its ad- visory panel and the many other organizations, groups, and committees that have participated in the Study. Daniel V. De Simone, Director U.S. Metric Study v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Letters of Transmittal Hi, iv Foreword v Summary and Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 I. Adaptation of Weighing and Measuring Devices 9 1-1. Introduction 9 1-2. Statistical Analysis: Qualifications 10 1-3. Adaptation of Weighing Devices 11 1-4. Adaptation of Metering Devices (Mechanical) 25 1-5. Adaptation of Fabric Measuring Devices 30 1-6. Adaptation of Miscellaneous Weighing and Measuring Devices 32 I- 7. Statistical Analysis Chart 34 Appendix 1-1. General Statistics Appendix 1-2. Scale Manufacturers Association Presentation of Views on Weighing Scale Conversions to the Metric System (September 15, 1970) 43 Appendix 1-3. National Scale Men's Association Presentation of Views on Conversion to the Metric System (October 30, 1970) 50 Appendix 1-4. Service Agencies (General Discussion) 54 Appendix 1-5. Glossary 56 II. Report of the Task Force on Metrication (December 17, 1970) 58 II- l. Introduction 59 1 1-2. Weights and Measures Jurisdictions 60 1 1 -3 . Inspector's Equipment 61 1 1-4. Weights and Measures Laws, Regulations, and Technical Specifications 68 72 1 1-5 . Education and Training Appendix II-l. Summary of Statistics 75 Appendix 1 1-2. State-County-City Service Center 79 Appendix 1 1 -3. Organization of the Task Force on Metrication 80 Appendix II-4. New State Standards 82 vii viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page III. Supplement 83 Metric Study Act, Public Law 90-472 (82 Stat. 693) 85 Excerpts from NBS Handbook 67, Checking Prepackaged Com- modities 86 Excerpts from the Report of the 54th National Conference on Weights and Measures, 1 969, N BS Special Publication 318 87 Excerpts from NBS Handbook 44, Specifications, Tolerances, and other Technical Requirements for Commercial Weighing and Measuring Devices ( 1 970 version) 88 Excerpts from the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, Public Law 89-755 (80 Stat. 1296) 94 Excerpts from the Model State Weights and Measures Law, as Adopted by the National Conference on Weights and Mea- sures (1970) 95 Excerpt from the United States Code 1 964 Edition, 1 5 U .S.C. 204 96 Excerpt from the 47th National Conference on Weights and Mea- sures, 1962, NBS Miscellaneous Publication 244 97 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to: 1. Identify and describe the impacts (cost, time, etc.) of changing selected commercial weighing and measuring devices to record and/or indicate in metric units. 2. Analyze the problems that increased metric usage would have on state and local weights and measures jurisdictions (e.g., laws and regulations, test- ing equipment, and training programs). BACKGROUND Evidence indicates that evolutionary metrication in the commercial weights and measures area is unlikely. Consequently, it is felt that a national metrication program would be needed in order to advance the usage of met- ric units in this area. SUMMARY: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS ATTITUDES TOWARD METRICATION A. Sixty-seven percent of the 15 weighing and measuring device manu- facturers responding to our industry questionnaires were in favor of metrica- tion; a like percentage, of the same respondents, were in favor of a mandato- ry metrication program based on legislation. I 2 COMMERCIAL WEIGHTS AND MEASURES B. Sixty-four percent of the 63 weights and measures jurisdictions responding to our jurisdiction questionnaire were in favor of metrication. BENEFITS OF METRICATION Device manufacturers, in fact, 73 percent of the respondents, and many weights and measures jurisdictions felt there would be benefits in using the metric system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CAPACITY One Gallon Split Into Fourths Is Four Quarts
    CAPACITY One gallon split into fourths is four quarts. Take that and divide by two and you got a pint. NAME: Split that pint up into halves and make a cup, DATE: and that cup will fit eight fluid ounces inside of it. One gallon is four quarts (or eight pints, or sixteen cups)! One quart is two pints (or four cups, or thirty-two fluid ounces)! WATCH VIDEO One pint is two cups (or sixteen fluid ounces)! One cup is eight fluid ounces! A gallon of milk split in fourths makes four quarts. Split a quart of milk in half; then a pint is what you’ll have, which can make two cups you see often when you drink your school milk carton. If you can drink the milk in eight sips, each is about an ounce going through your lips! Volume is a word that’s familiar, and capacity and volume are similar; and though it’s easy to assume, capacity’s not exactly volume. Capacity’s how much something can hold; the amount is always the same. Volume’s the measure of what’s inside, and that amount can change. Logo 1 www.numberock.com CAPACITY One gallon split into fourths is four . Take that and divide by two and you got a . NAME: Split that pint up into halves and make a , DATE: and that cup will fit eight inside of it. One gallon is quarts (or 8 pints, or 16 cups)! One quart is pints (or four cups, or thirty-two fluid ounces)! One pint is cups (or sixteen fluid ounces)! One cup is fluid ounces! A of milk split in fourths makes four quarts.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Metric Study Interim Report
    U.S. METRIC STUDY INTERIM REPORT THE CONSUMER imHHMHPHr U.S. METRIC SUBSTUDY REPORTS The results of substudies of the U.S. Metric Study, while being evaluated for the preparation of a comprehensive report to the Congress, are being published in the interim as a series of NBS Special Publications. The titles of the individual reports are listed below. REPORTS ON SUBSTUDIES NBS SP345-I: International Standards (issued December 1970, SD Catalog No. CI 3. 10:345-1, Price $1.25) NBS SP345-2: Federal Government: Civilian Agencies (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. CI 3. 10:345-2, price $2.25) NBS SP345-3: Commercial Weights and Measures (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. CI 3. 10:345-3, price $1.00) NBS SP345-4: The Manufacturing Industry (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. C 1 3. 10:345-4, price $ 1 .25) NBS SP345-5 Nonmanufacturing Businesses (in press) NBS SP345-6 Education (in press) NBS SP345-7 The Consumer (this publication) NBS SP345-8 International Trade (in press) NBS SP345-9 Department of Defense (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. C 1 3. 1 0:345-9, price $ 1 .25) NBS SP345-10: A History of the Metric System Controversy in the United States (in press) NBSSP345-11: Engineering Standards (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. C 1 3. 1 0:345-1 1 , price $2.00) NBSSP345-12: Testimony of Nationally Representative Groups (issued July 1971, SD Catalog No. C13. 10:345-12, price $1.50) COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON THE U.S. METRIC STUDY NBS SP345: To be published in August 1971 Those publications with catalog numbers have already been issued, and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Weights and Measures Standards of the United States—A Brief History (1963), by Lewis V
    WEIGHTS and MEASURES STANDARDS OF THE UMIT a brief history U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS NBS Special Publication 447 WEIGHTS and MEASURES STANDARDS OF THE TP ii 2ri\ ii iEa <2 ^r/V C II llinCAM NBS Special Publication 447 Originally Issued October 1963 Updated March 1976 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Wash., D.C. 20402. Price $1; (Add 25 percent additional for other than U.S. mailing). Stock No. 003-003-01654-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 76-600055 Foreword "Weights and Measures," said John Quincy Adams in 1821, "may be ranked among the necessaries of life to every individual of human society." That sentiment, so appropriate to the agrarian past, is even more appropriate to the technology and commerce of today. The order that we enjoy, the confidence we place in weighing and measuring, is in large part due to the measure- ment standards that have been established. This publication, a reprinting and updating of an earlier publication, provides detailed information on the origin of our standards for mass and length. Ernest Ambler Acting Director iii Preface to 1976 Edition Two publications of the National Bureau of Standards, now out of print, that deal with weights and measures have had widespread use and are still in demand. The publications are NBS Circular 593, The Federal Basis for Weights and Measures (1958), by Ralph W. Smith, and NBS Miscellaneous Publication 247, Weights and Measures Standards of the United States—a Brief History (1963), by Lewis V.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Mathematics of Conversions
    THE HISTORY AND MATHEMATICS OF CONVERSIONS BY JAMES D. NICKEL THE METRIC SYSTEM I f you live in the United States of America, you have to work with two systems of measure. These two sys- tems are called (1) British Imperial system of measure and (2) Metric system of measure. In the British sys- Item, with its long and storied history, there are many sub-systems where different bases are used. The pint- gallon system is base 8, the inches-foot system is base 12, the yard-foot system is base 3, the week-day system is base 7, the month-year system is base 12, the yard-mile system is base 1760, and the foot-mile system is base 5280. In contrast, the Metric system of measurement is, like most national currencies, decimalized (base 10). As we have already noted, it was developed in France in the late 18th century.1 Since the 1960s the International System of Units (SI) (Système International d'Unités in French, hence “SI”) has been the internationally recognized standard metric system. Metric units are widely used around the world for personal, commercial and scientific purposes. Of all the nations of the world (Date: early 21st century), only Liberia, Myanmar and the United States have not yet officially adopt- ed the Metric system. Metric units consist of a standard set of prefixes in multiples of 10 that may be used to derive larger and smaller units. Work- ing with these units is as easy as multiply- ing or dividing by 10 (or powers of 10).
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Man Office of Fair Trading Proposals for Changes to the Legal
    Isle of Man Office of Fair Trading Proposals for Changes to the Legal Quantities for Sales of Intoxicating Liquor Initial Consultation Paper November 2012 Contents 1. Introduction and Purpose 2. Background 3. Proposals and Questions 4. Consultation Process Appendix 1 List of Direct Consultees Appendix 2 Code of Practice on Consultation Appendix 3 Existing Primary and Secondary Legislation 2 1. Introduction and Purpose It is apparent from correspondence that the trade would like changes to be made to the legal quantities for sales of intoxicating liquor. These are driven in part by concerns about the continued availability of 1/5 gill spirit measuring instruments (commonly referred to as ‘optics’) and 1/5 gill capacity measures (commonly referred to as ‘thimble’ measures) and also in part by the need to promote sensible drinking and events such as wine tastings and beer festivals. Whether or not any such changes would be supported by consumers is open to debate and so there is a case for undertaking this initial public consultation before any changes are considered. The purposes of this consultation paper are:- to make interested parties aware of a number of proposals put forward by the Isle of Man Office of Fair Trading (‘the OFT’) for changes to the legal quantities for sales of intoxicating liquor; to make interested parties aware of the current situation both in the Island and in the UK; and to seek the views of interested parties on the proposals. The questions in bold within the ‘Proposals and Questions’ section are intended to prompt debate and are by no means exhaustive.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Made to Measure
    Made in Britain: Not made to measure. Ronnie Cohen © 2011 Ronnie Cohen. All rights reserved. 1 Table of Contents Foreword...............................................................................................................................................5 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................6 Central Role of Measurement in Daily Life.........................................................................................7 Why Measurement Matters..................................................................................................................8 Quest for Honest Measurements since Ancient Times.........................................................................9 Measurement Facts: Did you know that....?.......................................................................................10 Description of the British Imperial System........................................................................................11 Introduction to the British Imperial System..............................................................................11 Units of Length..........................................................................................................................11 Units of Area.............................................................................................................................11 Units of Volume........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Responses
    Isle of Man Office of Fair Trading CONSULTATION ON PROPOSALS FOR CHANGES TO THE LEGAL QUANTITIES FOR SALES OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR SUMMARY OF RESPONSES July 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Consultation Exercise 3. The Responses 4. Conclusions Appendix 1: List of Respondents Appendix 2: Summary of Responses Page 2 of 19 Version 1.0 1. Introduction In his introduction to the consultation document, the Chairman of the OFT stated:- “This public consultation is driven by repeated concerns about the continued availability of approved (‘stamped’) measuring equipment, which is used to determine measures of gin, rum, vodka, whisky and brandy sold by retail for consumption on the premises at which it is sold, in addition to the need to promote sensible drinking and facilitate events such as wine tastings and beer festivals. The opportunity has also been taken to consider the issue of ‘free pouring’, i.e. pouring into capacity measures that have not been ‘stamped’, which, in the OFT’s opinion, presents a risk of selling inaccurate measures. With the above in mind, the OFT is proposing three changes to the legal quantities for sales of intoxicating liquor and exploring the possibility of effectively banning ‘free pouring’ of the above spirits in the outlined circumstances.” Legal quantities for sales of intoxicating liquor in the Island are prescribed by the Weights and Measures (Intoxicating Liquor) Order 2001 (‘the 2001 Order’), which came into operation on 1st July 2001. Having considered the views of the Isle of Man Licensing Forum, which
    [Show full text]
  • Forster Gill, Inc
    SAFE HARBOR AGREEMENT WITH FORSTER-GILL, INC. FOR VOLUNTARY ENHANCEMENT/RESTORATION ACTMTIES BENEFITTING NORTHERN SPOTTED OWL AT BLUE LAKE, CALIFORNIA Permit No. TE057898-0 1. INTRODUCTION This Safe Harbor Agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into as of the day June 10,2002 by and among Forster-Gill, Inc.(Permittee); and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (Service); hereinafter collectively called the "Parties." The purpose of this Agreement is to facilitate the development of high quality northern spotted owl habitat and provide regulatory assurance that in doing so the landowner will not be subject to additional regulation related to the northein spotted owl on his property. This Agreement follows the Service's Safe Harbor Agreement final policy (64 FR 32717) and final regulations (64 FR 32706), and implements the intent of the Parties to follow the procedural and substantive requirements of section 1O(a)(l)(A) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This Agreement covers proposed management activities affecting lands owned by the Permittee, and covers only the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). The Agreement will cover the entire 236 acre property (Enrolled Lands). The Permittee will enhance and maintain the baseline of approximately 21 6 acres of forested northern spotted owl habitat currently on the property by managing his property through a succession of silvicultural treatments designed to convert a young even-aged timber stand into a multi-storied uneven aged condition with a large tree component recognized by the Service as having the characteristics of high quality northern spotted owl habitat. This Safe Harbor Agreement encourages proactive conservation efforts by the Permittee while providing him certainty that future property-use restrictions will not be imposed if those efforts attract northern spotted owls to his enrolled property.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructional Materials; *Metric System; *National Programs; Teacher Education; Vocational Education
    LAAA&V.&WWWM OVeTTMW ED 055 890 SE 012 591 TITLE U.S. Metric Study Interim Report- Education. INSTITUTION National Bureau of Standards (D0C), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NBS-SP-345 6 PUB DATE Jul 71 NOTE 210p.; aLxth in a series of interim reports prepared for the Congress of the United States AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Catalog No. C 13.10:345-6 $1.75) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$9.67 DESCRIPTORS Curriculum Developmen ; Educational Attitudes; Educational Change; Educational Strategies; Instructional Materials; *Metric System; *National Programs; Teacher Education; Vocational Education ABSTRACT This report-is another in the .series being .prepared on the numerous investigations comprising the U. S. Metric Study, by the U. S. National Bureau of Standards. This report concerns tho effects of increasing worldwide use of the metric system on-education in the United States. Its purpose is to present the.educational; -advantages and disadvantages of both-the metric and the customary systems. of units; to determine the current usage.of metric, measurements in schools, and trends in that usage; to find the ways in:which education would have to .change as the-U. S. accommodates to increased worldwide use of the-metric system, under a planned national progra or withoutsuch a program; and to eStimate the costs . of the changes; and to make -recommendations for:ways_ in which to take best-Advantage .of the changes. It is concluded thatithe..advantages of going.metric. in education are significant:but notoverwhelming. On the'other hand, the costs are not prohibitive and cam -be .met largely- out of normal expenditures.,A conversion-period of 10 years seems to bea Close- to the optimum, bat national leadership andsense of purpose -would .be.-needed to completely benefit from metric conversion.
    [Show full text]
  • Artist's Vision
    e ^Bteeze Jamaa Madlaon Unlv»r«lty' Monday, March 21,1983 Vol. 80 No. 44 ■%. — " Half-keg decision delayed By LISA JENNINGS A decision on whether to allow half kegs at dorm parties will wait until the end of this semester. Jim Krivoski, director of residence halls, and Dave Harvey, chairman of the SOA's Student Services Commit- tee, met last week about the Artist's possibility of a policy change. Harvey said the meeting ac- complished little. It was "a little discouraging because we've been vision working on this all semester. I was hoping for something more substan- French artist Luclen tial," Harvey said. Clergue lectured and In- Harvey said Krivoski delayed ac- structed JMU students on tion because he wanted to discuss a his specialty -* nude change with the residence hall staff photography. and wanted to contact other univer- "Each part of the body sities to compare alcohol policies. haa Ita own Ufa; each Krivoski would not comment Sun- woman la different," day. Clergue told students dur- The SGA has proposed that JMU ing the lecture, part of the policy be changed to allow half kegs 1963 Festival of the Arts. at dorm parties. Currently, JMU "A nude woman sym- policy allows only quarter kegs, with bdlzee fertility and life. one on tap at a time. Half kegs are permitted in a Below la an example of dorm's designated "party room," Clergue's work, titled according to the university hand- Chicago Suite." See book. page eight for story and The new proposal would change photo. the policy about dorm rooms and (Photos by Yo Nagaya) suites to read: "Only a one-quarter keg or a one-half keg container is allowed to be on tap at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrication Leaders Guide This Resource Book Will Help Make Your Inevitable Upgrade to the Metric System Easy, Smooth, Cheap, and Fast
    Metrication Leaders Guide This resource book will help make your inevitable upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast. Pat Naughtin 2009 2 of 89 Table of Contents Make your upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast 3 Metrication in a day 4 Learn the metric system in a minute 7 Become familiar with the metric system in an hour 9 Decision making for metrication leaders 10 What is metrication? 14 What is a metrication leader? 15 Approaches to metrication 17 Metrication business planning 21 Appendices 30 Who invented the metric system? 31 Universal acceptance of the metric system 34 Metrication approximations and reference points 38 Everyday metric examples, and metric rules of thumb 39 What holds metrication back? 56 Metrication is SUCCESSFUL 60 Summary of the metric system 62 Arguments and responses 66 Resources, references and acknowledgements 87 http://metricationmatters.com [email protected] 3 of 89 Make your upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast. Deciding on a metrication program confirms that you are a metrication leader – not a follower. You have the courage to stand aside from the crowd, decide what you think is best for yourself and for others, and you are prepared to differ from other people in your class, your work group, your company, or your industry. As a metrication leader, you will soon discover three things: 1 Metrication is technically a simple process. 2 Metrication doesn't take long if you pursue a planned and timed program. 3 Metrication can provoke deeply felt anti-metrication emotions in people who have had no measurement experience with metric measures, or people who have difficulty with change.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSI X-12 EDI Allowable Units of Measure and Codes
    ANSI X-12 EDI Allowable Units of Measure and Codes Code Description AA Ball AB Bulk Pack AC Acre AD Bytes AE Amperes per Meter AF Centigram AG Angstrom AH Additional Minutes AI Average Minutes Per Call AJ Cop AK Fathom AL Access Lines AM Ampoule AN Minutes or Messages AO Ampere-turn AP Aluminum Pounds Only AQ Anti-hemophilic Factor (AHF) Units AR Suppository AS Assortment AT Atmosphere AU Ocular Insert System AV Capsule AW Powder-Filled Vials AX Twenty AY Assembly AZ British Thermal Units (BTUs) per Pound A8 Dollars per Hours BA Bale BB Base Box BC Bucket BD Bundle BE Beam BF Board Feet BG Bag BH Brush BI Bar BJ Band BK Book BL Block BM Bolt BN Bulk BO Bottle BP 100 Board Feet BQ Brake horse power BR Barrel BS Basket BT Belt BU Bushel BV Bushel, Dry Imperial BW Base Weight BX Box BY British Thermal Unit (BTU) BZ Million BTU's B0 British Thermal Units (BTUs) per Cubic Foot B1 Barrels per Day B2 Bunks B3 Batting Pound B4 Barrel, Imperial B5 Billet B6 Bun B7 Cycles B8 Board B9 Batt CA Case CB Carboy CC Cubic Centimeter CD Carat CE Centigrade, Celsius CF Cubic Feet CG Card CH Container CI Cubic Inches CJ Cone CK Connector CL Cylinder CM Centimeter CN Can CO Cubic Meters (Net) CP Crate CQ Cartridge CR Cubic Meter CS Cassette CT Carton CU Cup CV Cover CW Hundred Pounds (CWT) CX Coil CY Cubic Yard CZ Combo C0 Calls C1 Composite Product Pounds (Total Weight) C2 Carset C3 Centiliter C4 Carload C5 Cost C6 Cell C7 Centipoise (CPS) C8 Cubic Decimeter C9 Coil Group DA Days DB Dry Pounds DC Disk (Disc) DD Degree DE Deal DF Dram DG Decigram DH Miles DI Dispenser DJ Decagram DK Kilometers DL Deciliter DM Decimeter DN Deci Newton-Meter DO Dollars, U.S.
    [Show full text]