Status Review of the Bearded Seal (Erignathus Barbatus)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Status Review of the Bearded Seal (Erignathus Barbatus) NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-211 Status Review of the Bearded Seal (Erignathus barbatus) by M. F. Cameron, J. L. Bengtson, P. L. Boveng, J. K. Jansen, B. P. Kelly, S. P. Dahle, E. A. Logerwell, J. E. Overland, C. L. Sabine, G. T. Waring, and J. M. Wilder U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center December 2010 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Marine Fisheries Service's Alaska Fisheries Science Center uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-AFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS-F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest Fisheries Center. The NMFS-NWFSC series is currently used by the Northwest Fisheries Science Center. This document should be cited as follows: M. F. Cameron, J. L. Bengtson, P. L. Boveng, J. K. Jansen, B. P. Kelly, S. P. Dahle, E. A. Logerwell, J. E. Overland, C. L. Sabine, G. T. Waring, and J. M. Wilder. 2010. Status review of the bearded seal (Erignathus barbatus ). U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-211, 246 p. Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-211 Status Review of the Bearded Seal (Erignathus barbatus) by M. F. Cameron1, J. L. Bengtson1, P. L. Boveng1, J. K. Jansen1, B. P. Kelly1, S. P. Dahle1, E. A. Logerwell1, J. E. Overland2, C. L. Sabine2, G. T. Waring3, and J. M. Wilder4 1 Alaska Fisheries Science Center 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 www.afsc.noaa.gov 2 Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 3 Northeast Fisheries Science Center 166 Water Street Woods Hole, MA 02543 4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Region, Marine Mammals Management 1011 East Tudor Road Anchorage, AK 99503 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Gary F. Locke, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Jane Lubchenco, Under Secretary and Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service Eric. C. Schwaab, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries December 2010 This document is available to the public through: National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 www.ntis.gov STATUS REVIEW OF THE BEARDED SEAL (Erignathus barbatus) NOAA photo by John Jansen Prepared and Edited by: The 2010 Bearded Seal Biological Review Team Michael F. Cameron1(Chair), John L. Bengtson1, Peter L. Boveng1, John K. Jansen1, Brendan P. Kelly1, Shawn P. Dahle1, Elizabeth A. Logerwell1, James E. Overland2, Christopher L. Sabine2, Gordon T. Waring3, and James M. Wilder4 With Contributions by: Muyin Wang5,2,Heather L. Ziel1, Erin E. Moreland1, Jay M. Ver Hoef1, Tamara L. Olson6, Duane E. Stevenson1 and Josh M. London1 1 Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115 2 Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115 3 Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543 4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Region, Marine Mammals Management, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503 5 Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, Box 355672, Seattle, WA 98195 6 Protected Resources Division, Alaska Region, National Marine Fisheries Service, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 43, Anchorage, AK 99513 December 2010 CONTENTS Contents ...................................................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... xi 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Species Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Taxonomy and Phylogeny ................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Species Description ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Behavior .............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3.1 Hauling out, diving and foraging .................................................................................................. 7 2.3.2 Mating, vocalizations and site fidelity ......................................................................................... 8 2.3.3 Breathing holes ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.4 Seasonal Distribution, Habitat‐use, and Movements ......................................................................... 9 2.5 Reproduction and Molting ................................................................................................................ 15 2.5.1 Whelping .................................................................................................................................... 15 2.5.1.1 Spatial distribution .............................................................................................................. 15 2.5.1.2 Annual timing ...................................................................................................................... 17 2.5.2 Nursing and rearing.................................................................................................................... 18 2.5.3 Breeding ..................................................................................................................................... 19 2.5.4 Molting ....................................................................................................................................... 20 2.5.4.1 Newborns ............................................................................................................................ 20 2.5.4.2 Adults .................................................................................................................................. 20 2.6 Vital Parameters ................................................................................................................................ 24 2.7 Feeding Habits ................................................................................................................................... 25 2.8 Historic and Current Abundance and Trends .................................................................................... 39 2.8.1 Erignathus barbatus nauticus .................................................................................................... 41 2.8.1.1 Sea of Okhotsk .................................................................................................................... 41 2.8.1.2 Bering Sea ........................................................................................................................... 42 2.8.1.3 Chukchi Sea ......................................................................................................................... 43 2.8.1.4 Beaufort Sea ........................................................................................................................ 43 2.8.1.5 East Siberian Sea ................................................................................................................. 43 vii 2.8.2 Erignathus barbatus barbatus .................................................................................................... 44 2.8.2.1 Hudson Bay, the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and western Baffin Bay ............................. 44 2.8.2.2 Greenland ........................................................................................................................... 44 2.8.2.3 Barents, Kara and White Seas and Svalbard ....................................................................... 45 2.8.2.4 Laptev Sea ........................................................................................................................... 45 2.8.3 Trends ........................................................................................................................................ 46 3 Species Delineation ............................................................................................................................. 47 3.1 Consideration of Distinct Population Segments ............................................................................... 48 3.1.1 Evaluation of Discreteness ......................................................................................................... 49 3.1.1.1 Separation by Physical, Physiological, Ecological, or Behavioral Factors ........................... 49 3.1.1.2 Delimitation by International Differences in Management
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum, Coal and Research Drilling Onshore Svalbard: a Historical Perspective
    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 99 Nr. 3 https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg99-3-1 Petroleum, coal and research drilling onshore Svalbard: a historical perspective Kim Senger1,2, Peter Brugmans3, Sten-Andreas Grundvåg2,4, Malte Jochmann1,5, Arvid Nøttvedt6, Snorre Olaussen1, Asbjørn Skotte7 & Aleksandra Smyrak-Sikora1,8 1Department of Arctic Geology, University Centre in Svalbard, P.O. Box 156, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 2Research Centre for Arctic Petroleum Exploration (ARCEx), University of Tromsø – the Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. 3The Norwegian Directorate of Mining with the Commissioner of Mines at Svalbard, P.O. Box 520, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 4Department of Geosciences, University of Tromsø – the Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. 5Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani AS, P.O. Box 613, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 6NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Fantoftvegen 38, 5072 Bergen, Norway. 7Skotte & Co. AS, Hatlevegen 1, 6240 Ørskog, Norway. 8Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway. E-mail corresponding author (Kim Senger): [email protected] The beginning of the Norwegian oil industry is often attributed to the first exploration drilling in the North Sea in 1966, the first discovery in 1967 and the discovery of the supergiant Ekofisk field in 1969. However, petroleum exploration already started onshore Svalbard in 1960 with three mapping groups from Caltex and exploration efforts by the Dutch company Bataaffse (Shell) and the Norwegian private company Norsk Polar Navigasjon AS (NPN). NPN was the first company to spud a well at Kvadehuken near Ny-Ålesund in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • South Spitsbergen S/V Noorderlicht
    South Spitsbergen 28 September – 05 October 2008 on board S/V Noorderlicht The Noorderlicht was originally built in 1910, in Flensburg. For most of her life she served as a light vessel on the Baltic. Then, in 1991 the present owners purchased the ship and re-rigged and re-fitted her thoroughly, according to the rules of ‘Register Holland’. Noorderlicht is 46 metres long and 6.5 metres breadth, a well-balanced, two- masted schooner rig that is able to sail all seas. With: Captain: Gert Ritzema (Netherlands) First mate: Dickie Koolwijk (Netherlands) Second mate: Elisabeth Ritzema (Netherlands) Chef: Anna Kors (Niederlande) Expedition leader: Rolf Stange (Germany) And 19 brave polar explorers from Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland and The United Kingdom 28. September 2008 – Longyearbyen Position at 1700: 78°14’N /15°37’E. Calm, 6°C he first bit of arctic soil that we set our feet on was the the runway of the little airport near Longyearbyen and there we met by our fearless leader, Rolf Stange from Germany, who Twas easily identified thanks to a Noorderlicht life ring. Soon we were on a bus on the way to the high arctic metropolis of Longyearbyen, where we still had some hours time to explore the settlement with its various excitements such as museum, supermarket and cafes and restaurants. Around 1700, we boarded the Noorderlicht which was alongside in the harbour of Longyearbyen. We moved into our cabins, stored our luggage away and then met the friendly crew for the first time. Captain Gert and Rolf welcomed us once again, introduced the ship and her crew, gave us some information about life on board and about some important safety issues.
    [Show full text]
  • REPRODUCCIÓN DEL PULPO Octopus Bimaculatus Verrill, 1883 EN BAHÍA DE LOS ÁNGELES, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO
    INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO DE CIENCIAS MARINAS REPRODUCCIÓN DEL PULPO Octopus bimaculatus Verrill, 1883 EN BAHÍA DE LOS ÁNGELES, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO TESIS QUE PARA OBTENER EL GRADO ACADÉMICO DE MAESTRO EN CIENCIAS PRESENTA BIÓL. MAR. SHEILA CASTELLANOS MARTINEZ La Paz, B.C.S., Agosto de 2008 AGRADECIMIENTOS Agradezco al Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas por abrirme las puertas para llevar a cabo mis estudios de maestría, así como al Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) y a los proyectos PIFI por el respaldo económico brindado durante dicho periodo. Deseo expresar mi agradecimiento a mis directores, Dr. Marcial Arellano Martínez y Dr. Federico A. García Domínguez por apoyarme para aprender a revisar cortes histológicos (algo que siempre dije que no haría jaja!), lidiar con mis carencias de conocimiento, enseñarme cosas nuevas y ayudarme a encauzar las ideas. Gracias también a la Dra. Patricia Ceballos (Pati) por la asesoría con las numerosas dudas que surgieron a lo largo de este estudio, las correcciones y por enseñarme algunos trucos para que los cortes histológicos me quedaran bien. Los valiosos comentarios del Dr. Oscar E. Holguín Quiñones y M.C. Marcial Villalejo Fuerte definitivamente han sido imprescindibles para concluir satisfactoriamente este trabajo. A todos, gracias por contribuir en mi formación profesional y personal. Quiero extender mi gratitud al Dr. Gustavo Danemann (PRONATURA Noroeste, A.C.) así como al Lic. Esteban Torreblanca (PRONATURA Noroeste, A.C.) por todo su apoyo para el desarrollo de la tesis; igualmente, a la Asociación de Buzos de Bahía de Los Ángeles, A.C. por su importante participación en la obtención de muestras y por el interés activo que siempre han mostrado hacia este estudio.
    [Show full text]
  • Überseehafen Rostock: East Germany’S Window to the World Under Stasi Watch, 1961-1989
    Tomasz Blusiewicz Überseehafen Rostock: East Germany’s Window to the World under Stasi Watch, 1961-1989 Draft: Please do not cite Dear colleagues, Thank you for your interest in my dissertation chapter. Please see my dissertation outline to get a sense of how it is going to fit within the larger project, which also includes Poland and the Soviet Union, if you're curious. This is of course early work in progress. I apologize in advance for the chapter's messy character, sloppy editing, typos, errors, provisional footnotes, etc,. Still, I hope I've managed to reanimate my prose to an edible condition. I am looking forward to hearing your thoughts. Tomasz I. Introduction Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski, a Stasi Oberst in besonderen Einsatz , a colonel in special capacity, passed away on June 21, 2015. He was 83 years old. Schalck -- as he was usually called by his subordinates -- spent most of the last quarter-century in an insulated Bavarian mountain retreat, his career being all over three weeks after the fall of the Wall. But his death did not pass unnoticed. All major German evening TV news services marked his death, most with a few minutes of extended commentary. The most popular one, Tagesschau , painted a picture of his life in colors appropriately dark for one of the most influential and enigmatic figures of the Honecker regime. True, Mielke or Honecker usually had the last word, yet Schalck's aura of power appears unparalleled precisely because the strings he pulled remained almost always behind the scenes. "One never saw his face at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • About EUROIMMUN
    Medizinische Labordiagnostika EUROIMMUN AG About EUROIMMUN Autoimmune diagnostics Infectious serology Allergology Antigen detection Molecular diagnostics Automation 2015 EUROIMMUN AG · 23560 Luebeck (Germany) · Seekamp 31 · Telephone +49 451 58550 · Fax 5855591 · E-mail [email protected] · Internet www.euroimmun.com EUROIMMUN is one of the leading manu- products. Every year, the EUROIMMUN facturers of medical laboratory diagnostics Academy receives almost 1000 customers worldwide and stands for innovation. Around from over 50 countries, providing training for 2000 employees in twelve countries develop, customers, fi eld staff, and employees from produce and sell test systems for the diagnosis all EUROIMMUN subsidiaries. The accredited of diseases, and software and automation Institute for Quality Assurance, an institution solutions for the performance and evaluation of the company, organises quality assess- of these assays. ment schemes and thus helps to maintain the high quality standard of external laboratories. Laboratories in over 150 countries use EUROIMMUN products for the diagnosis of The Institute for Experimental Immunology, autoimmune, infectious diseases and aller- another EUROIMMUN institution, is dedicated gies, and to perform genetic analyses. The to basic research. The institute also cooperates company was founded 1987 from the Uni- with universities, clinics and renowned versity of Luebeck (Schleswig-Holstein, Ger- research institutions from all over the world. many). In the business year 2014, the group These cooperations have resulted in a large turnover amounted to 175 million euros. number of diploma and doctorate theses. EUROIMMUN is ISO certifi ed (EN ISO 9001:2008, The enterprise has extensive expertise in EN ISO 13485:2012, ISO 13485/CMDCAS). the fi elds of immunology, cell biology, histo- logy, biochemistry and molecular biology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Oligocene Or Earliest Miocene Molluscan Fauna from Sitkinak Island, Alaska
    A Late Oligocene or Earliest Miocene Molluscan Fauna From Sitkinak Island, Alaska By RICHARD C. ALLISON and LOUIE MARINCOVICH, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1233 Describes the late Oligocene or earliest Miocene molluscan fauna from the Narrow Cape Formation on Sitkinak Island, noting the mixture of Asiatic, North American, and endemic high-latitude North Pacific taxa. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, &cretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Catal ogi ng in Pub1 ication Data A1 1i son, Richard C., 1935- A late Oligocene or earliest Miocene molluscan fauna from Sitki nak Is1and, A1 aska. ( Geological Survey Professional Paper ; 1233) Bibl iography: p. 9-10. Supt. of Doc. no.: I 19.16:1233 1. Moll usks, Fossil --A1 aska--Si tkinak I sl and. 2. Pal eontol ogy--01 igocene . 3. Pal eontol ogy--Mi ocene . I. Marincovich, Louie. 11. Title. 111. Series. QE801. A44 564' .09798' 4 81-607925 AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Introduction Faunal composition Age and correlation .................................................................................................................................. Relation to the type Narrow Cape Formation of Kodiak Island Paleoecology ................................................................................................................................................ Water depth Water temperature
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Larvae of Three Arctic Species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae)
    Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) Morgan S. Busby, Deborah M. Blood & Ann C. Matarese Polar Biology ISSN 0722-4060 Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by 2017. This e- offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) 1 1 1 Morgan S. Busby • Deborah M. Blood • Ann C. Matarese Received: 28 September 2016 / Revised: 26 June 2017 / Accepted: 27 June 2017 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Identification of fish larvae in Arctic marine for L. proboscidea in comparison to the other two species waters is problematic as descriptions of early-life-history provide additional evidence suggesting the genus Limanda stages exist for few species. Our goal in this study is to may be paraphyletic, as has been proposed in other studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum MOLLUSCA Chitons, Bivalves, Sea Snails, Sea Slugs, Octopus, Squid, Tusk Shell
    Phylum MOLLUSCA Chitons, bivalves, sea snails, sea slugs, octopus, squid, tusk shell Bruce Marshall, Steve O’Shea with additional input for squid from Neil Bagley, Peter McMillan, Reyn Naylor, Darren Stevens, Di Tracey Phylum Aplacophora In New Zealand, these are worm-like molluscs found in sandy mud. There is no shell. The tiny MOLLUSCA solenogasters have bristle-like spicules over Chitons, bivalves, sea snails, sea almost the whole body, a groove on the underside of the body, and no gills. The more worm-like slugs, octopus, squid, tusk shells caudofoveates have a groove and fewer spicules but have gills. There are 10 species, 8 undescribed. The mollusca is the second most speciose animal Bivalvia phylum in the sea after Arthropoda. The phylum Clams, mussels, oysters, scallops, etc. The shell is name is taken from the Latin (molluscus, soft), in two halves (valves) connected by a ligament and referring to the soft bodies of these creatures, but hinge and anterior and posterior adductor muscles. most species have some kind of protective shell Gills are well-developed and there is no radula. and hence are called shellfish. Some, like sea There are 680 species, 231 undescribed. slugs, have no shell at all. Most molluscs also have a strap-like ribbon of minute teeth — the Scaphopoda radula — inside the mouth, but this characteristic Tusk shells. The body and head are reduced but Molluscan feature is lacking in clams (bivalves) and there is a foot that is used for burrowing in soft some deep-sea finned octopuses. A significant part sediments. The shell is open at both ends, with of the body is muscular, like the adductor muscles the narrow tip just above the sediment surface for and foot of clams and scallops, the head-foot of respiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Iep Newsletter
    n Interagency Ecological Program for the San Francisco Estuary n IEP NEWSLETTER VOLUME 30, NUMBER 1, 2017 OF INTEREST TO MANAGERS .......................................................................................................................... 2 HIGHLIGHTS .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 All Hands on Deck: Revamping the Discrete Water Quality Blueprints of the IEP’s Environmental Monitoring Program .......................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of DWR Old-Middle River Turbidity Transects ........................................................................................ 5 STATUS AND TRENDS .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Zooplankton Monitoring 2013–2015 ......................................................................................................................... 9 CONTRIBUTED PAPERS .................................................................................................................................... 21 Evaluation of Adding Index Stations in Calculating the 20-mm Survey Delta Smelt Abundance Index ................ 21 Evaluating Potential Impact of Fish Removal at the Salvage Facility as part of the Delta Smelt Resiliency Strategy ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Life History, Mating Behavior, and Multiple Paternity in Octopus
    LIFE HISTORY, MATING BEHAVIOR, AND MULTIPLE PATERNITY IN OCTOPUS OLIVERI (BERRY, 1914) (CEPHALOPODA: OCTOPODIDAE) A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI´I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY DECEMBER 2014 By Heather Anne Ylitalo-Ward Dissertation Committee: Les Watling, Chairperson Rob Toonen James Wood Tom Oliver Jeff Drazen Chuck Birkeland Keywords: Cephalopod, Octopus, Sexual Selection, Multiple Paternity, Mating DEDICATION To my family, I would not have been able to do this without your unending support and love. Thank you for always believing in me. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all of the people who helped me collect the specimens for this study, braving the rocks and the waves in the middle of the night: Leigh Ann Boswell, Shannon Evers, and Steffiny Nelson, you were the hard core tako hunters. I am eternally grateful that you sacrificed your evenings to the octopus gods. Also, thank you to David Harrington (best bucket boy), Bert Tanigutchi, Melanie Hutchinson, Christine Ambrosino, Mark Royer, Chelsea Szydlowski, Ily Iglesias, Katherine Livins, James Wood, Seth Ylitalo-Ward, Jessica Watts, and Steven Zubler. This dissertation would not have happened without the support of my wonderful advisor, Dr. Les Watling. Even though I know he wanted me to study a different kind of “octo” (octocoral), I am so thankful he let me follow my foolish passion for cephalopod sexual selection. Also, he provided me with the opportunity to ride in a submersible, which was one of the most magical moments of my graduate career.
    [Show full text]
  • By C. M. Yonge, D.Se. University of Bristol
    453 EVOLUTION OF CILIARY FEEDING IN THE PROSOBRANCHIA, WITH AN ACCOUNT OF FEEDING IN GAPULUS UNGAR/GUS By C. M. Yonge, D.Se. University of Bristol (Text-figs. 1-6) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 453 Rejection Currents in the Mantle Cavity of the Prosobranchia 453 Evolution of Ciliary Feeding 455 Vermetus novae-hollandiae . 456 Crepidula fornicata and other Calyptraeidae 457 Capulus ungaricus 459 Modification of gill filaments 461 Discussion. 465 Summary 467 References. 468 INTRODUCTION Ciliary feeding, of such widespread occurrence in the Lamellibranchia, is confined in the Gastropoda to a few scattered groups. In freshwater Pul- monata, such as Limnaea, cilia on the foot assist in feeding when the animal is creeping suspended from the surface film (Brockmeier, 1898). Thecoso- matous Pteropoda feed exclusively by the aid of cilia on the unpaired middle lobe and the paired side lobes of the foot, and an evolutionary series- Cavolinia-Cymbulia-Gleba-can be traced in which there is a progressive elaboration in the perfection of this mechanism and an accompanying reduc- tion in the buccal mass and associated structures handed down from carni- vorous ancestors (Yonge, 1926). Only in the few prosobranchs which have acquired ciliary feeding mechanisms do these represent a modification of the ctenidia as in the Lamellibranchia. They also, as it is the aim of this paper to show, represent a modification of the rejection currents present in the mantle cavity of typical prosobranchs. REJECTION CURRENTS IN THE MANTLE CAVITY OF THE PROSOBRANCHIA In typical Prosobranchia a respiratory current, created by the beating of the lateral cilia on the gill filaments, is drawn into the mantle cavity by way of the inhalent opening (frequently prolonged into a siphon, e.g.
    [Show full text]