The Changing Politics of Ethnic Minority Classification and Experience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Changing Politics of Ethnic Minority Classification and Experience The Changing Politics of Ethnic Minority Classification and Experience Within China Julianne Stewart ASIAN 220 5/21/2018 The perception and portrayal of China’s many minority groups has shifted over time. Many people still only think of the predominant Han majority when they think of Chinese people but this erases all of the ethnic, religious and linguistic diversity that exists within the country. The Chinese government has had different policies regarding recognition of minorities that have led to both erasure of identity of minorities within China and the promotion of harmony between China’s 55 ethnic minorities depending on the political climate. These policies and the the language used regarding recognition of minorities has directly affected the lives and opportunities minority groups have today. While Han Chinese people are still the overwhelming majority, making up 92% of the population of China, Chinese minorities still amount to around 110 million people who are concentrated mainly around Southern and Western China. Today, China officially recognizes 56 minority groups within China. The slogan “tongyi de duo minzu guojia” or unified multinational ​ ​ country reflect the Chinese government’s current attempts to present China as a diverse but unified nation (Mullaney 2012). The 56 recognized ethnic groups and China’s multinational status are relatively recent developments. The Qing dynasty (1644-1912) was founded by the Manchu people, not the Han. Although the Manchu themselves were technically minorities, this did prevent the Qing dynasty from referring to minority groups in Yunnan under the single label of “barbarians in the southwest” (Mullaney 2012). This shows that minorities are not all united within China and are prone to enforcing the same stereotypes of other groups that the Han do. The Qing dynasty dealt with China’s diversity in a unique way. The first component of their system for maintaining control over all of the different ethnic groups spread throughout the country was their military. The Qing dynasty put in place an “eight banner” system which divided the military into eight divisions. The army included Chinese people of many different ethnicities, primarily Manchu, Han and Mongol people. Some minority groups, however, were not part of the eight banners system, such as minorities from Yunnan due to their “barbarian” status. The delicate balance between ethnic groups during the Qing dynasty was disturbed, as Han-Hui violence erupted in the mid 19th century. Around this time Anti-Qing advocates began adopting the Japanese term “minzoku” which can be translated as “ethnic groups” (Mullaney 2012). This term is not as neutral as it may first appear, in reality it is used to promote cultural and ethnic essentialism. In the case of the Anti-Qing advocates it was a way of justifying Han-Chinese racism directed at other ethnic groups, specifically the Manchus in this case. During this period the terms “Hanzu” and “Manzu” meaning Han people and Manchu people ​ ​ ​ ​ also came into wide usage (Mullaney 2012). These terms were used to provide clear divides down ethnic groups, making it easier to justify the superiority of Han people. The Guomindang and Communist parties after the fall of the Qing dynasty in the 20th century had very different stances on ethnic diversity in China. Republican nationalists, by creating an Anti-Qing rule that was meant to favor Han Chinese managed to alienate all other ethnic groups in the process. Worried about territory loss the Republican regime introduced the concept of China as a “Republic of Five Peoples”, who were the Han, Tibetans, Mongols, Manchus and Hui (Mullaney 2012). This inclusively attempt was a strategic move on the part of the Republican regime, who believed assimilating these minorities into the Han majority would be necessary to maintain power. Additionally calling China a “Republic of Five Peoples” blatantly ignores the multitude of other ethnic groups within the country. In the struggle for power between the CCP and GMD, minorities within China were an important variable because of the need to unify the country and the threat that minority groups posed in disturbing this unification. Many minority groups lived around China’s borders which made the task of securing the country’s borders more difficult. Later, however the GMD took a different approach for unification, rejecting the notion of China as multinational, claiming that Chinese people were homogenous. Chiang Kai Shek claimed that any difference in the five formerly recognized Chinese people was “territorial as well as religious, but not ethnological”(Mullaney 2012). The Communist party took the exact opposite stance as war with Japan was underway, claiming a dedication to recognizing China’s ethnic minorities in order to prevent divide at the hands of the Japanese. The CCP stressed that it was possible to be both Tibetan, Hui, Manchu or Mongul and still be Chinese while the GMD claimed that this stance would weaken China. The classification of ethnic minorities within China has historically been a very complicated issue and remains so to this day. During Mao’s Long March government officials journeyed to China’s rural Southwest and came into contact with minorities and cultures that they’d never been previously exposed to. This led to the desire to classify all of the different ethnic groups. One of the first attempts at classification after “the Republic of Five Peoples” was in 1953 as the CCP attempted to identify different ethnic groups specifically with Yunnan, China’s most diverse province. Language was quickly identified as an imperfect but practical way of identifying differences between ethnic groups. Some groups proved easier to identify than others, researchers were left with many groups they considered “plausible communities” and “borderline groups” some of whom shared characteristics with other ethnic groups or who’s origins were unclear (Mullaney 2012). This process of taxonomy is one that has spanned decades and was continuously built upon. The identification of minority groups has always been selective, with the government often arbitrarily deciding what constitutes a minority group and what doesn’t in order to promote China’s security and internal stability. The classification of minority groups was not undertaken in order to provide increased recognition and respect for minority groups but instead to further the CCP’s quest for stability and unification. The 1984 Regional Ethnic Autonomy Law has led to five autonomous regions, 30 ​ autonomous prefectures and 120 autonomous counties within China (Mullaney 2012). These areas are divided on the basis on ethnicity and state that members of the minority group that the autonomous area emcompasses are to be the heads of their own local government. This act was put into place in order to preserve local culture, language and tradition as well as to promote development in these areas as they have been historically underdeveloped. These laws that benefit minorities only exist within the autonomous regions, however. The many members of minority groups scattered outside these regions are not afforded the same privileges. Not all minority groups are viewed equally within China. As referenced earlier, in the Qing dynasty viewed people in Yunnan as barbarians while recruiting Hui and Mongul people for their army. Currently in China, a range of different stereotypes exists for different minorities groups. Uyghur people are often thought to be dangerous, Tibetans mystically spiritual, and groups in Yunnan are thought to be friendly but primitive. These stereotypes are incredibly reductionist and dehumanizing. During my interview of a Chinese college student that took place in January 2018 she expressed frustration that she believes people in the U.S. do not know about China’s geographical and ethnic diversity. This frustration seems to indicate that she believes understanding China’s diversity is key for understanding China. Whether this comes from a place of believing in inclusion and equality or a desire to unify the country and maintain control of its many territories is difficult to discern. While many Han Chinese people today recognize that ethnic minorities are Chinese, ethnic minorities being presented as foreign or alien has been common throughout history. During the Tang dynasty, China’s most important literary dynasty, two words were used by many scholars to create a dichotomy between the Han Chinese and all other minorities within China and even those outside of China. Hua, often translated as ​ ​ “Chinese”, was used to talk about Han people. Today Han is a more common term but focus on differentiation between different ethnic groups was not heavily emphasized until the 20th century when classification became important for unification (Abramson 2008). Fan, which can be ​ ​ translated as foreigner, was often used to describe anyone who was not Han. This very exclusionary language reflects the ideology that Han people are superior or the true “Chinese people”. This ideology can not be rooted in a single dynasty or time period, forms of discrimination and subordination of minorities has existed as long as there has been diversity within China and the government has wanted to rule over this diversity. In modern day China, one of the largest barriers in society for many minorities is language. Although some minorities like the Hui and Manchu are native speakers of Putonghua, ​ ​ the predominant language spoken by Han people, many others such as the Uighurs, Tibetans and Mongolians have their own written and spoken languages (Chen 2007). China began focusing on linguistic unification and reform after 1949. In 1982 Putonghua was recognized for the first time ​ ​ in the constitution. Putonghua was the predominant language in China long before being ​ ​ officially recognized in the constitution but this addition marked a promotion of language policy in mainland China. Putonghua is a tool for unifying China, strengthening it against possible ​ ​ outside aggressors. This meant Putonghua also became the official language of education, business, publications and government in China (Chen 2007).
Recommended publications
  • Application to Become a Member of International Safe Community Network
    Application to Become a Member of International Safe Community Network Wanlian Subdistrict, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning, China October, 2010 1 1. Overview of Wanlian Subdistrict Located in the central part of Shenhe District of Shenyang City, Wanlian Subdistrict covers an area of 1.004 square kilometers with four communities. By February 2010, there are 16,921 households and 38,398 residents, among which 8,277 old people account for 21.5% of total residents; 3,126 children 8.1%; 514 disabled people 1.3%; 339 poor people 1.9%. (Community Figure of Wanlian Office ) Population Statistics of Wanlian Community from 2007 to 2009 Population 2007 2008 2009 Statistics vs Age Groups 0-14 4221 4247 4590 15-24 4493 4521 4886 25-64 29545 29724 32120 65-79 5430 5464 5904 80- 943 949 1025 1 Total 44632 44905 48525 The community is abundant in science, technology and education resources. There are such large scientific research units as 606 Institute, Middling Shenyang Design Academy, Photosensitive Academy, Vacuum Academy and so on with the military unit- Shen Kong Headquarters. There are all kinds of schools and 18 kindergartens as well as 363 small medium and large sized enterprises and public institutions. The community health station can provide services for the whole community, which develops the six-in-one hygienic service integrating prevention, medical care, recovery, healthy education and family planning at regular intervals. The citizen fitness ground is the largest one in Shenyang, which covers an area of 10,000 square meters in the community. Almost 5,000 exercisers are attracted by 354 fitness facilities every day.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchu Grammar (Gorelova).Pdf
    HdO.Gorelova.7.vw.L 25-04-2002 15:50 Pagina 1 MANCHU GRAMMAR HdO.Gorelova.7.vw.L 25-04-2002 15:50 Pagina 2 HANDBOOK OF ORIENTAL STUDIES HANDBUCH DER ORIENTALISTIK SECTION EIGHT CENTRAL ASIA edited by LILIYA M. GORELOVA VOLUME SEVEN MANCHU GRAMMAR HdO.Gorelova.7.vw.L 25-04-2002 15:50 Pagina 3 MANCHU GRAMMAR EDITED BY LILIYA M. GORELOVA BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KÖLN 2002 HdO.Gorelova.7.vw.L 25-04-2002 15:50 Pagina 4 This book is printed on acid-free paper Die Deutsche Bibliothek – CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Gorelova, Liliya M.: Manchu Grammar / ed. by Liliya M. Gorelova. – Leiden ; Boston ; Köln : Brill, 2002 (Handbook of oriental studies : Sect.. 8, Central Asia ; 7) ISBN 90–04–12307–5 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gorelova, Liliya M. Manchu grammar / Liliya M. Gorelova p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section eight. Central Asia ; vol.7) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 9004123075 (alk. paper) 1. Manchu language—Grammar. I. Gorelova, Liliya M. II. Handbuch der Orientalis tik. Achte Abteilung, Handbook of Uralic studies ; vol.7 PL473 .M36 2002 494’.1—dc21 2001022205 ISSN 0169-8524 ISBN 90 04 12307 5 © Copyright 2002 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by E.J. Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Palace Machine Work Palace Machine the Making
    11 ASIAN HISTORY Siebert, (eds) & Ko Chen Making the Machine Palace Work Edited by Martina Siebert, Kai Jun Chen, and Dorothy Ko Making the Palace Machine Work Mobilizing People, Objects, and Nature in the Qing Empire Making the Palace Machine Work Asian History The aim of the series is to offer a forum for writers of monographs and occasionally anthologies on Asian history. The series focuses on cultural and historical studies of politics and intellectual ideas and crosscuts the disciplines of history, political science, sociology and cultural studies. Series Editor Hans Hågerdal, Linnaeus University, Sweden Editorial Board Roger Greatrex, Lund University David Henley, Leiden University Ariel Lopez, University of the Philippines Angela Schottenhammer, University of Salzburg Deborah Sutton, Lancaster University Making the Palace Machine Work Mobilizing People, Objects, and Nature in the Qing Empire Edited by Martina Siebert, Kai Jun Chen, and Dorothy Ko Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Artful adaptation of a section of the 1750 Complete Map of Beijing of the Qianlong Era (Qianlong Beijing quantu 乾隆北京全圖) showing the Imperial Household Department by Martina Siebert based on the digital copy from the Digital Silk Road project (http://dsr.nii.ac.jp/toyobunko/II-11-D-802, vol. 8, leaf 7) Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout isbn 978 94 6372 035 9 e-isbn 978 90 4855 322 8 (pdf) doi 10.5117/9789463720359 nur 692 Creative Commons License CC BY NC ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0) The authors / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2021 Some rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, any part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise).
    [Show full text]
  • The Interaction Between Ethnic Relations and State Power: a Structural Impediment to the Industrialization of China, 1850-1911
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Georgia State University Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Sociology Dissertations Department of Sociology 5-27-2008 The nI teraction between Ethnic Relations and State Power: A Structural Impediment to the Industrialization of China, 1850-1911 Wei Li Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/sociology_diss Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Li, Wei, "The nI teraction between Ethnic Relations and State Power: A Structural Impediment to the Industrialization of China, 1850-1911." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2008. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/sociology_diss/33 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Sociology at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INTERACTION BETWEEN ETHNIC RELATIONS AND STATE POWER: A STRUCTURAL IMPEDIMENT TO THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF CHINA, 1850-1911 by WEI LI Under the Direction of Toshi Kii ABSTRACT The case of late Qing China is of great importance to theories of economic development. This study examines the question of why China’s industrialization was slow between 1865 and 1895 as compared to contemporary Japan’s. Industrialization is measured on four dimensions: sea transport, railway, communications, and the cotton textile industry. I trace the difference between China’s and Japan’s industrialization to government leadership, which includes three aspects: direct governmental investment, government policies at the macro-level, and specific measures and actions to assist selected companies and industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Y Chromosome of Aisin Gioro, the Imperial House of Qing Dynasty
    Y Chromosome of Aisin Gioro, the Imperial House of Qing Dynasty YAN Shi1*, TACHIBANA Harumasa2, WEI Lan‐Hai1, YU Ge1, WEN Shao‐Qing1, WANG Chuan‐Chao1 1 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China 2 Pen name * Please contact [email protected] Abstract House of Aisin Gioro is the imperial family of the last dynasty in Chinese history – Qing Dynasty (1644 – 1911). Aisin Gioro family originated from Jurchen tribes and developed the Manchu people before they conquered China. By investigating the Y chromosomal short tandem repeats (STRs) of 7 modern male individuals who claim belonging to Aisin Gioro family (in which 3 have full records of pedigree), we found that 3 of them (in which 2 keep full pedigree, whose most recent common ancestor is Nurgaci) shows very close relationship (1 – 2 steps of difference in 17 STR) and the haplotype is rare. We therefore conclude that this haplotype is the Y chromosome of the House of Aisin Gioro. Further tests of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) indicates that they belong to Haplogroup C3b2b1*‐M401(xF5483), although their Y‐STR results are distant to the “star cluster”, which also belongs to the same haplogroup. This study forms the base for the pedigree research of the imperial family of Qing Dynasty by means of genetics. Keywords: Y chromosome, paternal lineage, pedigree, family history, haplogroup, Qing Dynasty This research was supported by the grants from the National Science Foundation of China (31271338), and from Ministry of Education (311016).
    [Show full text]
  • Bridled Tigers: the Military at Korea's Northern Border, 1800–1863
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 Bridled Tigers: The Military At Korea’s Northern Border, 1800–1863 Alexander Thomas Martin University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Alexander Thomas, "Bridled Tigers: The Military At Korea’s Northern Border, 1800–1863" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3499. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3499 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3499 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bridled Tigers: The Military At Korea’s Northern Border, 1800–1863 Abstract The border, in late Chosŏn rhetoric, was an area of pernicious wickedness; living near the border made the people susceptible to corruption and violence. For Chosŏn ministers in the nineteenth century, despite two hundred years of peace, the threat remained. At the same time, the military institutions created to contain it were failing. For much of the late Chosŏn the site of greatest concern was the northern border in P’yŏngan and Hamgyŏng provinces, as this area was the site of the largest rebellion and most foreign incursions in the first half of the nineteenth century. This study takes the northern border as the most fruitful area for an inquiry into the Chosŏn dynasty’s conceptions of and efforts at border defense. Using government records, reports from local officials, literati writings, and local gazetteers, this study provides a multifaceted image of the border and Chosŏn policies to control it. This study reveals that Chosŏn Korea’s concept of border defense prioritized containment over confrontation, and that their policies were successful in managing the border until the arrival of Western imperial powers whose invasions upended Chosŏn leaders’ notions of national defense.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 International Conference on Multiculture and Education(ICME)
    Table of Contents 2018 International Conference on Multiculture and Education Opening Remark ······························································································································· viii Welcoming Remark ····························································································································· x Program ············································································································································· xxii Keynote Speech Global modernity and its repercussion ····················································································· 3 Volker H. Schmidt(Singapore) Language education for marriage immigrant women and their families ························ 17 Seonjung Kim(Korea) Cultural Performance Session A-1 Research on transnational ethnic relations: World context and cases in Vietnam ···· 29 Vuong Xuan Tinh(Vietnam) Local cadres, corruption and villagers’ protests in a Red river Delta village, Vietnam ··· 50 Nguyen Van Suu(Vietnam) Young Korean Argentines in the Argentine garment industry and their social integration ······································································································································ 69 Jihye Kim(UK) In search of globally compassionate multicultural/intercultural education: Critical lessons learned from Rev. Theodore Hesburgh's vision and social activism during the civil rights movement and afterwards ····················································································
    [Show full text]
  • From Chinese Silver Ingots to the Yuan
    From Chinese Silver Ingots to the Yuan With the ascent of the Qing Dynasty in 1644, China's modern age began. This epoch brought foreign hegemony in a double sense: On the one hand the Qing emperors were not Chinese, but belonged to the Manchu people. On the other hand western colonial powers began to influence politics and trade in the Chinese Empire more and more. The colonial era brought a disruption of the Chinese currency history that had hitherto shown a remarkable continuity. Soon, the Chinese money supply was dominated by foreign coins. This was a big change in a country that had used simple copper coins only for more than two thousand years. 1 von 11 www.sunflower.ch Chinese Empire, Qing Dynasty, Sycee Zhong-ding (Boat Shape), Value 10 Tael, 19th Century Denomination: Sycee 10 Tael Mint Authority: Qing Dynasty Mint: Undefined Year of Issue: 1800 Weight (g): 374 Diameter (mm): 68.0 Material: Silver Owner: Sunflower Foundation A major characteristic of Chinese currency history is the almost complete absence of precious metals. Copper coins dominated monetary circulation for more than 2000 years. Paper money was invented at an early stage - primarily because the coppers were too unpractical for large transactions. The people's confidence in paper money was limited, however. Hence silver became a common standard of value, primarily in the form of ingots. The use of ingots as means of payment dates back 2000 years. However, because silver ingots were smelted now and again, old specimens are very rare. This silver ingot in the shape of a boat – Yuan Bao in Chinese – dates from the Qing dynasty (1644-1911).
    [Show full text]
  • Chinax Course Notes
    Part 6: The Manchus and the Qing 23: The Qing Vision of Empire Professor Mark Elliot taught most of this section, allowing us to benefit from his personal focus on the Qing and the Manchus. Professor Bol stepped in for one week to teach The Scholars and Prosperous Suzhou, which must have been his special interest. It was one of the most fascinating weeks of the course129 and by far the toughest. Historical Overview The origins of the Qing dynasty date back to the 1630s with a peasant rebellion led by Li Zicheng, a former postal official. Indeed, this may be the first recorded instance of an individual 'going postal.' 130 Li's rebellion spread through central China, drawing upon the anger of farmers, clerks, and soldiers who were devastated by, among other things, the inflation of copper currency against the silver required for tax payments.131 By the 1640s, the rebel army was moving toward Beijing. Meanwhile, the Manchus, descendents of the Jurchens of the Jin dynasty, were uniting tribal groups northeast of China, forging alliances with the eastern Mongols and raiding the Ming, all under the leadership of Nurhaci. By the late 1620s, the Ming had lost control of the northeast. Hong Taiji, Nurhaci's son and successor, re-organized and strengthened the Jin state, and in the 1630s conquered Korea, bolstering Manchu security and prestige. In 1636, Hong renamed his dynasty the Great Qing (da qing). In 1644, Li's rebels captured Beijing, leading the Ming emperor to hang himself. Shortly after that, the Ming general Wu Sangui, who was guarding the Great Wall at the Shanhai Pass, allied with the Manchus against Li Zicheng, deciding that he preferred the organized armies of the Manchus to the pillaging forces of the rebellion.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Shamanic Empire of the Early Qing, Its Role in Inner Asian
    THE SHAMANIC EMPIRE AND THE HEAVENLY ASTUTE KHAN: ANALYSIS OF THE SHAMANIC EMPIRE OF THE EARLY QING, ITS ROLE IN INNER ASIAN HEGEMONY, THE NATURE OF SHAMANIC KHANSHIP, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR MANCHU IDENTITY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI’I AT MANOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY May 2020 By Stephen Garrett Thesis Committee: Shana Brown, Chairperson Edward Davis Wensheng Wang Keywords: Qing Dynasty, Manchu, Mongol, Inner Asia, Shamanism, Religion and Empire Acknowledgments: I would like to first and foremost show my deepest gratitude to my master’s thesis advisor, Dr. Shana Brown, whose ongoing uplifting support and instrumental advice were central to my academic success, without which I couldn’t have reached the finish line. I would also like to extend deepest thanks to my master’s thesis committee members Dr. Edward Davis and Dr. Wensheng Wang, who freely offered their time, efforts, and expertise to support me during this thesis project. Additionally, I would like to extend thanks to Dr. Mathew Lauzon and Dr. Matthew Romaniello, who both offered a great deal of academic and career advice, for which I am greatly appreciative. Special thanks to my peers: Ryan Fleming, Reed Riggs, Sun Yunhe, Wong Wengpok, and the many other friends and colleagues I have made during my time at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. They have always been a wellspring of academic advice, discussion, and support. While writing my master’s thesis, I have had the pleasure of working with the wonderful professional staff and faculty of the University of Hawaii at Manoa, whose instruction and support were invaluable to my academic success.
    [Show full text]
  • The Passing of Emperor
    The Field Museum Education Department Presents Educator Guide Part 1 The Field Museum Education Department develops On-line Educator Guides to provide detailed information on field trip planning, alignment with Illinois State Goals and Learning Standards, as well as hands-on classroom activities to do before or after your visit to the Museum. Splendors of China’s Forbidden City: The Glorious Reign of Emperor Qianlong March 12—September 12, 2004 Explore the hidden world of the Imperial Court and experience the Chinese empire at the peak of its wealth and power. Teacher’s Note: Splendors of China’s Forbidden City: The Glorious Reign of Emperor Qianlong consists of eight sections. Before you visit the exhibition, spend some time viewing the information on the Web site to begin planning your visit. We also recommend using some of our quick fun facts and pre-activities to introduce your student to the cultural complexities of the exhibition and focus one or two sections within the exhibition to study in depth. Each section has an introduction, guiding questions, pre-activities, field trip activities and post-activities to help guide your students’ experience. Sections: Section 1: Section 5: Orientation to Imperial China Personal Taste Section 2: Section 6: Symbol of Supreme Power Religion Section 3: Section 7: Effective Leader The Passing of Emperor . Section 4: Section 8: Family & Roles of Women Transition area, garden for reflection, and reading area Photos courtesy of Palace Museum, Beijing The Field Museum • Educator Guide • Part 1 Page 1 Corresponding Illinois Learning Standards Use of the materials in this Educator Guide in combination with a field trip to the exhibition will help you link learning experiences to the following Illinois Learning Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Toponyms to Analyze the Endangered Manchu Language in Northeast China
    sustainability Article Using Toponyms to Analyze the Endangered Manchu Language in Northeast China Zhenhua Zhu ID , Hongyan Zhang *, Jianjun Zhao ID , Xiaoyi Guo ID , Zhengxiang Zhang ID , Yanling Ding and Tao Xiong School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China; [email protected] (Z.Z.); [email protected] (J.Z.); [email protected] (X.G.); [email protected] (Z.Z.); [email protected] (Y.D.); [email protected] (T.X.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-431-8509-9550 Received: 12 January 2017; Accepted: 16 February 2018; Published: 24 February 2018 Abstract: UNESCO has classified Manchu in Northeast China as a critically endangered language. Toponyms can act as carriers of languages and can be preserved for a long time. The Manchu language was the national language in the Qing Dynasty, and there are many Manchu place names in Northeast China that serve as “living heritages” that retain traces of ancient local cultures. We studied Manchu and other related ethnic place names in Northeast China by integrating spatial statistical measures using geographic information systems (GIS) to analyze the endangered languages in the region. The objective was to explore not only the distribution of ethnic toponyms within a relevant historical context but also the environmental factors associated with the endangered Manchu languages. This study reveals that the distributions of ethnic groups and languages can be revealed by the Sinification of ethnic toponyms in Northeast China. The evolution of spatial patterns of toponyms shows the interactive process between Manchus and Han Chinese. The Manchu language is endangered by the influences of Han Chinese migrants on the original culture, as reflected by crops and the distances to the nearest roads, which are indicators of farming culture and accessibility.
    [Show full text]