<<

454 S. Harvey Plymouth, Michigan Regular Meeting, February 23, 2021 - 7:00 p.m.

VIRTUAL MEETING The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) recently issued an order regarding attendance limits at gatherings during the COVID-19 Emergency. Following the guidance of this order, the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools Board of Education will meet electronically. Please click the link below to view this livestream Board meeting. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrmvPI7A1k6jPVlRrWQSxoA

2020-2021 Meeting Calendar Calendar of Board Meetings 2020-2021 (p. 4)

Call The Meeting to Order

Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance

A. Adoption of Agenda/Approval of Consent Agenda

Action Item #21-02-47

1. Human Resources

New Hires New Hires (p. 5)

Resignations Resignations (p. 6)

2. Approval of Minutes Regular Meeting Minutes - February 9, 2021 (p. 7)

3. Final Reading Policies Policy #2266 - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities (p. 11) Policy #2410 - Prohibition of Referral or Assistance (p. 29)

Packet page 1 of 126 Policy #2414 - Reproductive Health And Family Planning (p. 31) Policy #5517.02 - Sexual Violence (Rescind-Delete) (p. 33) Policy #7440.01 - Video Surveillance (p. 39) Policy #8450.05 - Emergency Telecommuting Policy (ETTP) (p. 41)

B. Celebrating Success

Honoring Bus Drivers at West Middle School for going above and beyond Presenter: Member Kehoe

C. Board Committee Reports/Action

1. President's Report

2. Student Performance & Achievement Committee (SPA)-Anupam Sidhu

Next Meeting: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 @ 4:30 p.m.

3. Policy Committee-Patti McCoin

Next Meeting: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 @ 5:30 p.m.

4. Finance and Operations Committee-Patrick Kehoe

Next Meeting: Thursday, March 4, 2021 @ 5:00 p.m.

D. Administrative Reports/Recommendations

1. Superintendent's Report

2. Finance and Operations - Deborah Piesz

Consider Approval of a Resolution for Bid Package #EL-1 (First Reading) Bid Package #EL-1 (Presentation) (p. 43) Contract Awards for Bid Package #EL-1 (p. 62)

Action Item #21-02-48 Consider Approval of a Resolution to Purchase Secondary Picnic Tables (First and Final Reading) Secondary Picnic Table Purchase (p. 114)

E. Citizens' Comments

Please click on the link below to submit a Citizens' Comment: Citizens' Comment Form

F. Action Items/Discussion

Future Agenda Topics

Packet page 2 of 126 Action Items

Action Item #21-02-49 Consider Approval of Designating a Representative for Region 8 for a 3-Year Term on the MASB of Directors (First and Final Reading) Resolution - Designate a Representative to Vote-MASB Region 8 Board of Directors (p. 126)

G. Follow-up Board Questions

H. Adjournment

Diistriict Viisiion: P-CCS will deliver an innovative educational experience which propels each student to excellence. Diistriict Miissiion: P-CCS will develop capable, involved citizens who recognize that they are citizens of the world, use critical thinking skills, and are lifelong learners.

Packet page 3 of 126

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS E. J. McClendon Educational Center 454 S. Harvey, Plymouth, Michigan Meetings of the Board of Education 2020-2021 (subject to change)

DATE TIME MEETING/TOPIC LOCATION February 23, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting Virtual Meeting March 9, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting To Be Determined March 23, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting To Be Determined April 13, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting To Be Determined April 27, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting To Be Determined May 11, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting To Be Determined May 25, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting To Be Determined June 8, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting To Be Determined June 22, 2021 7 p.m. Regular Meeting To Be Determined

Regular meetings of the Board of Education of the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools, Wayne and Washtenaw Counties, Michigan, shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month (except there will be only one meeting in July (July 28) and one meeting in December (December 8). Any person with a disability who needs accommodation for participation in this meeting should contact the Superintendent’s Office at 734-416-3048 at least five days in advance of the meeting to request assistance.

Video recording of any open meeting is permitted with prior approval of the Superintendent. Update 2-17-21

Packet page 4 of 126 Action Item 21-02-47 Board Meeting: February 23, 2021

New Contracts 2020/2021 School Year

NAME/POSITION/SCHOOL HIRE DATE DEGREE/UNIVERSITY CERTIFICATION SALARY EXPERIENCE

DORMAN, AUDREY 03/02/2021 BA-Eastern Michigan University ART ELEMENTARY Annual $41,111.00 BENTLEY/DODSON Actual $15,234.59 1 YR AIRPORT SCHOOLS CERTIFICATE: SECONDARY STANDARD: EXP: 06/30/2024 K-12 LQ

LAGINESS, JUSTIN 03/01/2021 BA-Eastern Michigan University ENGLISH Annual $46,896.00 SALEM Actual $17,761.70 2.5 YRS CHARTER, .50 YR SOUTH CAROLINA CERTIFICATE: SECONDARY STANDARD: EXP: 06/30/2023 6-12 BA

MCDOUGALL, JORDAN 03/01/2021 BA-Eastern Michigan University ART ELEMENTARY Annual $40,000.00 WORKMAN/TONDA Actual $15,149.86 .50 PAROCHIAL CERTIFICATE: INTERIM TEACHING CERT (Alternative Route/TC): EXP: 06/30/2025 K-12 LQ

PALAJAC, RACHAEL 02/24/2021 BA-Central Michigan University MUSIC SECONDARY Annual $54,882.00 MA-University of Michigan PIONEER Actual $21,683.62 6 YRS PINCKNEY SCHOOLS, 3 YRS BRONSON SCHOOLS CERTIFICATE: SECONDARY STANDARD: EXP: 06/30/2022 6-12 JQ

PUMMILL, MOLLY 03/01/2021 BA-Concordia College RESOURCE ROOM Annual $40,000.00 HOBEN/TONDA Actual $15,040.87 CERTIFICATE: ELEMENTARY STANDARD: EXP: 06/30/2026 K-12 SM

MOTION: AUTOMATICALLY ACCEPT AS PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ACTION. "Move that the Board of Education approve the new hires as listed above."

MOVED SECONDED VOTE

Packet page 5 of 126

Action Item: 21-02-47 Board Meeting: February 23, 2021

2020/2021 SCHOOL YEAR

RESIGNATIONS

NAME, ASSIGNMENT, DATE OF HIRE REASON, EFFECTIVE DATE

ARGUE, SIMONE Resignation effective February 19, 2021 EI CATEGORICAL CLASSROOM PIONEER 12/04/2019

MOTION:

AUTOMATICALLY ACCEPT AS PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ACTION.

"Move that the Board of Education approve the above Resignation as listed above.”

Packet page 6 of 126 PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Plymouth, Michigan

BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES February 9, 2021

The Board of Education of the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools, Wayne and Washtenaw Counties, Michigan, met (virtually) in a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, February 9, 2021, at 7:00 p.m.

President McCoin called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

Present: Members Brooks, Christenson, Kehoe, McCoin, Sidhu, and Wilson Absent: Member Savage

Administrators Present: Ms. Monica L. Merritt, Superintendent of Schools Dr. Liz Vartanian-Gibbs, Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources Ms. Deborah Piesz, Chief Finance and Operations Officer Ms. Bethany Rayl, Chief Academic Officer Mr. Kurt Tyszkiewicz, Executive Director of Student Services Mr. Nick Brandon, Executive Director of Communications and Marketing

Others Present: Ms. Heather Fitchpatrick, PCEA President

Member McCoin led the Pledge of Allegiance.

A. Adoption of the Agenda/Approval of Consent Agenda

Action Item #21-02-43: It was moved by Member Sidhu and seconded by Member Kehoe to adopt the Agenda and the Consent Agenda as presented. The Consent Agenda consisted of New Hires, Leaves, Resignations, First Reading Policies, and Regular Meeting Minutes of January 26, 2021. Ayes: Members Brooks, Christenson, Kehoe, McCoin, Sidhu, and Wilson Nays: None The motion was carried 6-0

New Hires Alessandrini, David Math Effective 1-29-21 Pioneer Middle School Eddings, Jessica English Effective 2-11-21 Pioneer Middle School Holliday, Nichole Language Arts Effective 2-8-21 East Middle School Landreth, Amanda Elementary Classroom Effective 2-10-21 Hoben Elementary School Menzer, Rory Math Support Effective 2-1-21 West Middle School Sockow, Amanda Elementary Classroom Effective 2-8-21 Tonda Elementary School Stephens, Danielle Integrated Science Effective 2-11-21 Pioneer Middle School Summitt, Zachary Political Science/Economics Effective 2-5-21 Salem High School Utter, Megan EI Categorical Classroom Effective 2-17-21 Bentley Elementary School Wiggle, Alyssa Language Arts Effective 2-11-21 Pioneer Middle School Packet page 7 of 126 February 9, 2021

Leaves of Absence Tarchala, Sarah Math Unpaid Childcare Leave of Salem High School Absence 1-25-21 to 6-11-21

Resignations McHale, Andrea Preschool EL Support Resignation Effective 2-5-21 Gallimore Elementary School

Approval of Minutes The Regular Meeting Minutes of January 26, 2021, were approved as presented.

B. Celebrating Success

Member Brooks presented the Mary Beth Carroll Extra Miler Award to Erica Saks, Liberty Middle School Teacher, who was nominated by one of her students for being positive, creating exciting lessons, and for showing how much she cares for her students every day.

C. Board Committee Reports/Action

President’s Report – Patti McCoin President McCoin spoke about the Plante Moran workshop that she and member Sidhu attended last week, which provided information on the open meetings act and upcoming legislative changes. She thanked district administration for their hard work to keep updated with legislative changes and for their diligence to ensure compliance. She also expressed appreciation to her board colleagues for visiting some of our school buildings this week as students return to their classrooms and thanked district principals for being very accommodating and engaging.

Student Performance and Achievement Committee (SPA) – Anupam Sidhu Member Sidhu thanked the community members that joined the last committee meeting, where the committee reviewed a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion presentation and discussed student summer learning opportunities. She also mentioned that the SPA Committee has extended the deadline for community members interested in filling a vacancy on the committee to February 26, 2021. Anyone interested in applying for this role is encouraged to visit the district website to read more about how to express interest in this position. The next meeting is scheduled as a virtual meeting on Wednesday, March 3, 2021, at 4:30 p.m. Information and links for this meeting will be available to view on the P-CCS website and everyone is welcome to attend this virtual meeting.

Policy Advisory Committee – Patti McCoin Member McCoin shared that the Policy Committee has not met since the last Board meeting. The next meeting is scheduled as a virtual meeting on Tuesday, February 23, 2021, at 5:30 p.m. Upcoming meeting discussion will include a review of legislative changes that may require district policy updates. Information and links for this meeting will be available to view on the P-CCS website and everyone is welcome to attend this virtual meeting.

Finance and Operations Committee – Patrick Kehoe Member Kehoe shared that the Finance and Operations Committee has not met since the last Board meeting. The next meeting is scheduled as a virtual meeting on Thursday, February 18, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. Discussion for this meeting will include a review of a budget input form that will be available to the public so they can provide feedback and suggestions as the committee begins works on the 2021-2022 budget process. Information and links for this meeting will be available to view on the P-CCS website and everyone is welcome to attend this virtual meeting.

Educational Excellence Foundation (EEF) – Gretchen Ward Gretchen Ward, EEF Executive Director, shared that the EEF held its annual meeting in January where it officially welcomed Patrick Kehoe as the School Board Representative and MaryBeth Ravesz the PCEA representative. She shared that these important positions help the EEF as it works to align its efforts with the goals of the school Board and the needs of teachers and students. She mentioned that the EEF is heading into scholarship season and that each year, it awards upwards of $20,000 to graduating P-CCS students continuing with their education. She strongly encouraged all graduating students to visit the EEF website at www.eefforkids/scholarships to view and apply for scholarships. Applications are also available for pick up in the high school guidance counseling offices. 2

Packet page 8 of 126 February 9, 2021

D. Administrative Reports/Recommendations

Superintendent’s Report – Monica Merritt Superintendent Merritt provided a recap of the district’s current in-person learning plans, which were approved at the last Board meeting. She spoke about a daily schedule change presented to her earlier that day, making it necessary for students in grades K-8 to remain in their current hybrid plan until March 1. The additional days provided will allow P-CCS to adjust to a revised schedule, ensure adequate distancing of students within all classrooms, and provide sufficient supervision during lunch periods. She acknowledged the disappointment shared by district families but expressed confidence that students will be able to return to the next phase of full in- person learning on March 1, 2021. Members of the administrative team spoke about the success experienced in our school buildings with students currently in a hybrid plan and provided updates at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. Class schedules impacted by the new date were reviewed. It was noted that building design teams are studying many options and will continue to work through the complexities to fully return our high school students. Multiple photos of district classrooms, hallways, and cafeterias were displayed to show Board members and the community how changes to desk configurations, signage, and furniture placement are being made to achieve the recommended physical distancing in our schools. The importance of all students and staff adhering to the district’s mitigation strategies to reduce transmission was noted as crucial to best support in-person learning plans moving forward. Member Kehoe shared information as chair of the District Learning Design Metrics Subcommittee, which focuses on local data and transmission rates to assist the district as it implements learning plans safely and effectively. The availability of staff COVID-19 vaccinations through the Wayne County Health Department brought encouraging news to P-CCS as staff members were able to receive vaccination appointments last Friday with many more employees scheduled to receive their vaccination later this week. Board members were given an opportunity to comment, ask questions, and provided positive feedback from their visits to our school buildings during the last few weeks.

Human Resources – Liz Vartanian Gibbs, Ed.D. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in P-CCS Dr. Liz Vartanian-Gibbs introduced Dr. Denise Lilly, Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, who provided an overview of the journey of Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI) in P-CCS to date and shared plans moving forward. Dr. Lilly provided a timeline dating back to 2007 when the Board of Education first passed a resolution supporting a districtwide diversity plan. She highlighted work done in recent years, which includes teacher professional development, staff education, and policies to support DEI. She spoke about the creation of her position in 2019, which was designed to assist the district with its DEI initiatives and ensure a committed focus on the important work ahead. She highlighted the equity work taking place in multiple district departments, the work being done in the dynamic planning process, and through an upcoming equity audit by the Hanover Research Firm. Finally, she stressed the importance of creating a climate where all students are respected, valued, and heard so they can learn and thrive. Board members were given an opportunity to comment and/or ask questions.

Student Services – Kurt Tyszkiewicz Canton High School Student Chief Mascot and Logo Presentation Mr. Hal Heard, Director of Secondary Education, and Ms. Sharida Lewis, Canton High School Principal, introduced a group of P-CEP Congress students who gave a presentation regarding the Canton High School Chief Mascot. The student’s presentation included information they have gathered to support why they believe the Canton Chief’s mascot/logo should be retired. Highlights included rationale, resources to support their belief that the Chiefs mascot creates false stereotypes, current climate, budget planning to rebrand, and feedback from the Native American community in support of this change. Board members were given an opportunity to comment and/or ask questions.

3

Packet page 9 of 126 February 9, 2021

Finance and Operations – Deborah Piesz Final Reading Resolutions • Action Item #21-2-44: It was moved by Member Kehoe and seconded by Member Wilson to Award the 2020 Bond Technology Consultant contract to Barton Malow. Mr. Mark Salzer, Director of Integrated Technology Systems, outlined the in-depth interview process conducted with multiple firms before reaching this recommendation. Barton Malow brings over 70 years of collective experience, comes highly recommended by other school districts, and will assist the district to minimize contracted technology services costs while maximizing the knowledge, skill, and expertise provided by these services. The cost of this work will be funded with 2020 Bond Funds (Final Reading). Ayes: Members, Brooks, Christenson, Kehoe, McCoin, Sidhu, and Wilson Nays: None The motion was carried 6-0

E. Citizens’ Comments

• Amanda Curtright, Sara Silverman, Christopher Merritt, Lauren Lucas, Sommer Foster, Danna Caloia, Bonnie Bedolla, Karen Patterson, Lisa Keating, Patrick Gleason, Desiree Tomayko, Ann Monroe, Debra Wilson, Melissa Schilling, Cheri Hansen, Marie Everitt, Ann-Marie Gerrity, Lashon Jones, Sarah Korona, Shana DiTullio, Marie Everitt, Shannon Suryan, Jenna Fisher, Amanda McMahon, Crystal Haley, Aleza Merkel, Keith Kompoltowicz, Jennifer Black, Lindsey Marcum, Mary Smothers, Emily Pelak, Clinton Mikel, Brian Brown, Carmen Davis, Karen Henderson, Laura Sinclair, Laurie Longeway, Lisa Loeb, Lauren Flanagan, Trish Kvasnak, Kerry Smith, Krista Gable, Jason Cooke, Bernadet Edwards, Heather Duran, Tony Frazer, Stacy Towler, Heather Duran, Jake Tapscott, Hanan Peters, and Melissa Courtney, commented and/or asked questions about the district’s instructional models for the remainder of this year. • Tracy Artley, Hallie Barkume, Neha Hafeez, Erin Bensinger, Denali Wood, Chris DeVries, Jessika Whiteside, and Madhurima Das spoke on the Canton High School Mascot • Wendy Duren, LaToya Ellis, Monique Williams, Lawrence Millben, Carmen Davis, and Natasha Campbell spoke on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at P-CCS • Erin Wines, Karen Hudson, Jennifer Grubb, and Amy Fava spoke on pass/fail grades for P-CEP students • Elizabeth Harris spoke about P-CEP start times • Chris Schilling and Dave Camporesi spoke on district transportation and the wearing of masks • Lily Todd spoke on middle school athletics

F. Action Items/Discussion

Future Meeting Topics • Start time for high schools

Discussion • The Board discussed adding a special meeting next week after data is received to confirm adequate physical distancing is possible for all student classroom and cafeteria spaces. Member McCoin will send an email to all Board members to coordinate a date and time.

G. Follow-up Board Questions

• None

H. Adjournment

President McCoin adjourned the Regular Meeting at 11:23 p.m.

______Doug Brooks Secretary, Board of Education 4

Packet page 10 of 126 Action Item # 21-02-47 Board Meeting: February 23, 2021

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Plymouth, Michigan

M E M O

MEMO TO: Members of the Board of Education Monica Merritt, Superintendent

FROM: Kurt Tyszkiewicz, Executive Director of Student Services

DATE: February 19, 2021

SUBJECT: Policy #2266 - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities

Date to Administrator for review Au gust, 2020 Reviewed by: Kurt Tyszkiewicz

Date reviewed and approved by the Policy Advisory Committee: January 26, 2021

This policy from NEOLA: reflects current state of the law and should be adopted to have accurate X policies is recommended but not required

is optional

This policy is being brought to the Board of Education for second reading.

KEY IDEA:

On May 6, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) released its Final Rule, which amends existing Title IX regulations – the Department’s first action of its kind in decades. The Final Rule, which encompasses both the amended regulations and accompanying commentary, exceed 2,000 pages, and are scheduled to take effect on August 14, 2020. The regulations bring sweeping changes to how educational institutions address, investigate, and adjudicate allegations of sexual harassment occurring within their programs and activities. These changes include jurisdictional changes based on the definition of sexual harassment and of educational programs and activities in the Final Rule.

RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION

It was moved by member ______and seconded by member ______to approve the second reading of Policy 2266 for the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools.

Ayes: ______

Nays: ______

The Motion was: ______

Attachments _X__ New/Revised/Replacement Bylaw _ _ Current Policy Packet page 11 of 126

Book Policy Manual

Section Special Update - Title IX Regulations - July 2020

Title Special Update - Title IX Regulations - July 2020 New NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX IN EDUCATION PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES

Code po2266

Status

2266 - NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX IN EDUCATION PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES

Introduction

The Board of Education of the Plymouth-Canton Community School District (hereinafter referred to as “the Board” or “the District”) does not discriminate on the basis of sex (including sexual orientation or gender identity), in its education programs or activities, and is required by Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, and its implementing regulations, not to discriminate in such a manner. The requirement not to discriminate in its education program or activity extends to admission and employment. The Board is committed to maintaining an education and work environment that is free from discrimination based on sex, including sexual harassment.

The Board prohibits Sexual Harassment that occurs within its education programs and activities. When the District has actual knowledge of Sexual Harassment in its education program or activity against a person in the United States, it shall promptly respond in a manner that is not deliberately indifferent.

Pursuant to its Title IX obligations, the Board is committed to eliminating Sexual Harassment and will take appropriate action when an individual is determined responsible for violating this policy. Board employees, students, third-party vendors and contractors, guests, and other members of the School District community who commit Sexual Harassment are subject to the full range of disciplinary sanctions set forth in this policy. The Board will provide persons who have experienced Sexual Harassment ongoing remedies as reasonably necessary to restore or preserve access to the District’s education programs and activities.

Coverage

This policy applies to Sexual Harassment that occurs within the District’s education programs and activities and that is committed by a member of the School District community or a Third Party.

This policy does not apply to Sexual Harassment that occurs off school grounds, in a private setting, and outside the scope of the District’s education programs and activities; such Sexual Misconduct/Sexual Activity may be prohibited by the Student Code of Conduct if committed by a student, or by Board policies and administrative guidelines, applicable State and/or Federal laws ( ) and/or Employee/Administrator Handbook(s) [END OF OPTION] if committed by a Board employee.

Consistent with the U.S. Department of Education’s implementing regulations for Title IX, this policy does not apply to Sexual Harassment that occurs outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, even if the Sexual Harassment occurs in the District’s education programs or activities. Sexual Harassment that occurs outside the geographic boundaries of the United States is governed by the Student Code of Conduct if committed by a student, or by Board policies and administrative guidelines, applicable State and/or Federal laws ( ) and/or Employee/Administrator Handbook(s) [END OF OPTION] if committed by a Board employee.

Definitions

Words used in this policy shall have those meanings defined herein; words not defined herein shall be construed according to their plain and ordinary meanings.

Sexual Harassment: “Sexual Harassment” means conduct on the basis of sex that satisfies one or more of the following:

A. A Board employee conditioning the provision of an aid, benefit, or service of the District on an individual’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct (often called “quid pro quo” harassment);

B. Unwelcome conduct determined by a reasonable person to be so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the District’s education program or activity; or

Packet page 12 of 126 C. “Sexual assault” as defined in 20 U.S.C. 1092(f)(6)A(v), or “dating violence” as defined in 34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(10), “domestic violence” as defined in 34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(8), or “stalking” as defined in 34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(30).

“Sexual assault” means any sexual act directed against another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent. Sexual assault includes rape, sodomy, sexual assault with an object, fondling, incest, and statutory rape.

1. [ ] [OPTION 1] Rape is penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. Attempted rape is included. [END OF OPTION 1]

[X] [OPTION 2] Rape is the carnal knowledge of a person (i.e., penetration, no matter how slight, of the genita or anal opening of a person), without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. [END OF OPTION 2]

2. Sodomy is oral or anal sexual intercourse with another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity.

3. Sexual Assault with an Object is using an object or instrument to unlawfully penetrate, however slightly, the genital or anal opening of the body of another person, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. An “object” or “instrument” is anything used by the offender other than the offender’s genitalia.

4. Fondling is the touching of the private body parts of another person for the purpose of sexual gratification, without the consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity.

5. Incest is sexual intercourse between persons who are related to each other within the degrees wherein marriage is prohibited by State law.

6. Statutory Rape is sexual intercourse with a person who is under the statutory age of consent as defined by State law.

7. Consent refers to words or actions that a reasonable person would understand as agreement to engage in the sexual conduct at issue. A person may be incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. A person who is incapacitated is not capable of giving consent.

8. Incapacitated refers to the state where a person does not understand and/or appreciate the nature or fact of sexual activity due to the effect of drugs or alcohol consumption, medical condition, disability, or due to a state of unconsciousness or sleep.

D. “Domestic violence” includes felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by:

1. a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim;

2. a person with whom the victim shares a child in common;

3. a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner;

4. a person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred; or

5. any other person against an adult or youth victim who is protected from that person’s acts under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction in which the crime occurred.

E. “Dating violence” means violence committed by a person who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim. The existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on consideration of the length of the relationship, the type of relationship, and the frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.

F. “Stalking” means engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to – (1) fear for the person’s safety or the safety of others; or (2) suffer substantial emotional distress.

Packet page 13 of 126

Complainant: “Complainant” means an individual who is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute Sexual Harassment.

Respondent: “Respondent” means an individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute Sexual Harassment.

Formal Complaint: “Formal Complaint” means a document filed by a Complainant or signed by the Title IX Coordinator alleging Sexual Harassment against a Respondent and requesting that the District investigate the allegation(s) of Sexual Harassment. At the time of filing a Formal Complaint with the District, a Complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in the District’s education program or activity. A “document filed by a complainant’’ means a document or electronic submission (such as by electronic mail or through an online portal that the Board provides for this purpose) that contains the Complainant’s physical or digital signature, or otherwise indicates that the Complainant is the person filing the Formal Complaint. Where the Title IX Coordinator signs a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Coordinator is not a Complainant or a party to the Formal Complaint and must not have a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or an individual complainant or respondent.

Actual Knowledge: “Actual knowledge” means notice of Sexual Harassment or allegations of Sexual Harassment to the District’s Title IX Coordinator, or any District official who has authority to institute corrective measures on behalf of the Board, or any Board employee. The mere ability or obligation to report Sexual Harassment or to inform a student about how to report Sexual Harassment, or having been trained to do so, does not qualify an individual as one who has authority to institute corrective measures on behalf of the District. “Notice” includes, but is not limited to, a report of Sexual Harassment to the Title IX Coordinator. This standard is not met when the only District official with actual knowledge is the Respondent.

Supportive Measures: “Supportive measures” means non-disciplinary, non-punitive individualized services offered as appropriate, as reasonably available, and without fee or charge to the Complainant or the Respondent before or after the filing of a Formal Complaint or where no Formal Complaint has been filed. Such measures are designed to restore or preserve equal access to the District’s education program or activity without unreasonably burdening the other party, including measures designed to protect the safety of all parties or the District’s educational environment, or deter Sexual Harassment. Supportive measures may include counseling, extensions of deadlines or other course-related adjustments, modifications of work or class schedules, school/campus escort services, mutual restrictions of contact between the parties, changes in work locations), leaves of absence, increased security and monitoring of certain areas of the campus (including school buildings and facilities), (X) referral to Employee Assistance Program [END OF OPTION], and other similar measures.

Education Program or Activity: “Education program or activity” refers to all operations of the District, including but not limited to in-person and online educational instruction, employment, extracurricular activities, athletics, performances, and community engagement and outreach programs. The term applies to all activity that occurs on school grounds or on other property owned or occupied by the Board. It also includes locations, events and circumstances that take place off-school property/grounds over which the Board exercises substantial control over both the Respondent and the context in which the Sexual Harassment occurs.

School District community: “School District community” refers to students and Board employees (i.e., administrators, and professional and classified staff), as well as Board members, agents, volunteers, contractors, or other persons subject to the control and supervision of the Board.

Third Parties: “Third Parties” include, but are not limited to, guests and/or visitors on School District property (e.g., visiting speakers, participants on opposing athletic teams, parents), vendors doing business with, or seeking to do business with the Board, and other individuals who come in contact with members of the School District community at school-related events/activities (whether on or off District property).

Inculpatory Evidence: “Inculpatory evidence” is evidence that tends to establish a Respondent’s responsibility for alleged Sexual Harassment.

Exculpatory Evidence: “Exculpatory evidence” is evidence that tends to clear or excuse a Respondent from allegations of Sexual Harassment.

Day(s): Unless expressly stated otherwise, the term “day” or “days” as used in this policy means business day(s) (i.e., a day(s) that the Board office is open for normal operating hours, Monday – Friday, excluding State-recognized holidays),

Eligible Student: “Eligible Student” means a student who has reached eighteen (18) years of age or is attending an institution of postsecondary education.

Title IX Coordinator(s)

The Board of Education designates and authorizes the following individual(s) to oversee and coordinate its efforts to comply with Title IX and its implementing regulations:

Packet page 14 of 126

The Title IX Coordinator shall report directly to the Superintendent. Questions about this policy should be directed to the Title IX Coordinator.

The Superintendent/designee shall notify applicants for admission and employment, students, parents or legal guardians of elementary and secondary school students, Board employees, and all unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the Board of the following information:

The Board of Education of the Plymouth-Canton Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of sex in its education program or activity, and is required by Title IX and its implementing regulations not to discriminate in such a manner. The requirement not to discriminate in its education program or activity extends to admission and employment. The District’s Title IX Coordinator(s) is/are:

Dr. Liz Vartanian-Gibbs ______(Name)

Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources ______(School District Title)

734-416-2739 ______(Telephone Number)

454 S. Harvey St. Plymouth, MI 48170 ______(Office Address)

[email protected] ______(E-mail Address)

Mr. Kurt Tyszkiewicz ______(Name)

Executive Director for Student Services ______(School District Title)

734-416-4929 ______

Packet page 15 of 126 (Telephone Number)

454 S. Harvey St. Plymouth, MI 48170 ______(Office Address)

[email protected] ______(E-mail Address)

Any inquiries about the application of Title IX and its implementing regulations to the District may be referred to the Title IX Coordinator(s), the Assistant Secretary for the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, or both.

The Board has adopted a grievance process that provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that is prohibited by Title IX and/or its implementing regulations. The grievance process is included in Policy 2266 – Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities, which is available at: https://www.pccsk12.com/departments/board-of-education/policies The grievance process specifically addresses how to report or file a complaint of sex discrimination, how to report or file a formal complaint of Sexual Harassment, and how the District will respond.

The Superintendent/designee shall also prominently display the Title IX Coordinator’s(s’) contact information – including name(s) and/or title(s), phone number(s), office address(es), and e-mail address(es) – and this policy on the District’s website and in each handbook or catalog that the Board makes available to applicants for admission and employment, students, parents or legal guardians of elementary and secondary school students, Board employees, and all unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements.

Grievance Process

The Board is committed to promptly and equitably resolving student and employee complaints alleging Sexual Harassment. The District’s response to allegations of Sexual Harassment will treat Complainants and Respondents equitably, including providing supportive measures to the Complainant and Respondent, as appropriate, and following this Grievance Process before imposition of any disciplinary sanctions or other actions, other than supportive measures, against the Respondent.

The Title IX Coordinator(s), along with any investigator(s), decision-maker(s), or any person(s) designated to facilitate an informal resolution process, shall not have a conflict of interest or bias for or against Complainants or Respondents generally or an individual Complainant or Respondent.

If a determination of responsibility for Sexual Harassment is made against the Respondent, the Board will provide remedies to the Complainant. The remedies will be designed to restore or preserve equal access to the District’s education program or activity. Potential remedies include, but are not limited to, individualized services that constitute supportive measures. Remedies may also be disciplinary or punitive in nature and may burden the Respondent.

Report of Sexual Discrimination/Harassment

Any person may report sex discrimination, including Sexual Harassment (whether or not the person reporting is the person alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute sex discrimination or Sexual Harassment), in person, by mail, by telephone, or by electronic mail, using the Title IX Coordinator’s(s’) contact information listed above, or by any other means that results in the Title IX Coordinator receiving the person’s oral or written report. Reports may be made at any time (including during non-business hours), by using the telephone number(s) or electronic mail address(es), or by mail to the office address(es), listed for the Title IX Coordinator(s). ( ) Anonymous reports may be submitted using [ ] the online reporting form posted at [insert the web address for the reporting form, or insert a hyperlink tied to the phrase “online reporting form” [or] [ ] the hotline reporting number ([insert phone number]).

Students, Board members, and Board employees are required, and other members of the School District community, and Third Parties) are encouraged, to report allegations of sex discrimination or Sexual Harassment promptly to the/a Title IX Coordinator or to any Board employee, who will in turn notify the/a Title IX Coordinator. Reports can be made orally or in writing and should be as specific as possible. The person making the report should, to the extent known, identify the alleged victim(s), perpetrator(s), and witness(es), and describe in detail what occurred, including date(s), time(s), and location(s).

If a report involves allegations of Sexual Harassment by or involving the Title IX Coordinator, the person making the report should submit it to the Superintendent, or another Board employee who, in turn, will notify the Superintendent of the report. The Superintendent will then serve in place of the Title IX Coordinator for purposes of addressing that report of Sexual Harassment.

Packet page 16 of 126 The Board does business with various vendors, contractors, and other third-parties who are not students or employees of the Board. Notwithstanding any rights that a given vendor, contractor, or third-party Respondent may have under this policy, the Board retains the right to limit any vendor’s, contractor’s, or third-party’s access to school grounds for any reason. The Board further retains all rights it enjoys by contract or law to terminate its relationship with any vendor, contractor, or third-party irrespective of any process or outcome under this policy.

A person may file criminal charges simultaneously with filing a Formal Complaint. A person does not need to wait until the Title IX investigation is completed before filing a criminal complaint. Likewise, questions or complaints relating to Title IX may be filed with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights at any time.

Any allegations of Sexual Misconduct/Sexual Activity not involving Sexual Harassment will be addressed through the procedures outlined in Board policies (X) and/or administrative guidelines, [END OF OPTION] the applicable Student Code of Conduct, applicable collective bargaining agreement, and/or Employee/Administrator Handbook.

Because the Board is considered to have actual knowledge of Sexual Harassment or allegations of Sexual Harassment if any Board employee has such knowledge, and because the Board must take specific actions when it has notice of Sexual Harassment or allegations of Sexual Harassment, a Board employee who has independent knowledge of or receives a report involving allegations of sex discrimination and/or Sexual Harassment must notify the/a Title IX Coordinator within two (2) days of learning the information or receiving the report. The Board employee must also comply with mandatory reporting responsibilities pursuant to M.C.L. 722.623 and Policy 8462 – Student Abuse and Neglect, if applicable. If the Board employee’s knowledge is based on another individual bringing the information to the Board employee’s attention and the reporting individual submitted a written complaint to the Board employee, the Board employee must provide the written complaint to the Title IX Coordinator.

If a Board employee fails to report an incident of Sexual Harassment of which the Board employee is aware, the Board employee may be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination.

When a report of Sexual Harassment is made, the Title IX Coordinator shall promptly (i.e., within two (2) days of the Title IX Coordinator’s receipt of the report of Sexual Harassment) contact the Complainant (including the parent/guardian if the Complainant is under 18 years of age or under guardianship) to discuss the availability of supportive measures, consider the Complainant’s wishes with respect to supportive measures, inform the Complainant of the availability of supportive measures with or without the filing of a Formal Complaint, and explain to the Complainant the process for filing a Formal Complaint. The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the effective implementation of supportive measures. Any supportive measures provided to the Complainant or Respondent shall be maintained as confidential, to the extent that maintaining such confidentiality will not impair the ability of the District to provide the supportive measures.

Emergency Removal: Subject to limitations and/or procedures imposed by State and/or Federal law, the District may remove a student Respondent from its education program or activity on an emergency basis after conducting an individualized safety and risk analysis. The purposes of the individualized safety and risk analysis is to determine whether the student Respondent poses an immediate threat to the physical health or safety of any student or other individual arising from the allegations of Sexual Harassment that justifies removal. If the District determines the student Respondent poses such a threat, it will so notify the student Respondent and the student Respondent will have an opportunity to challenge the decision immediately following the removal. See Policy 5610 – Emergency Removal, Suspension, and Expulsion of Students and Policy 5611 – Due Process Rights.

If the Respondent is a non-student employee, the District may place the Respondent on administrative leave during the pendency of the grievance process.

For all other Respondents, including other members of the School District community and Third Parties, the Board retains broad discretion to prohibit such persons from entering onto its school grounds and other properties at any time and for any reason, whether after receiving a report of Sexual Harassment or otherwise.

Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

A Formal Complaint may be filed with the Title IX Coordinator in person, by mail, or by electronic mail, by using the contact information set forth above ( ) and by ______If a Formal Complaint involves allegations of Sexual Harassment by or involving the Title IX Coordinator, the Complainant should submit the Formal Complaint to the Superintendent, who will designate another person to serve in place of the Title IX Coordinator for the limited purpose of implementing the grievance process with respect to that Formal Complaint.

When the Title IX Coordinator receives a Formal Complaint or signs a Formal Complaint, the District will follow its Grievance Process, as set forth herein. Specifically, the District will undertake an objective evaluation of all relevant evidence – including both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence – and provide that credibility determinations will not be based on a person’s status as a Complainant, Respondent, or witness.

It is a violation of this policy for a Complainant(s), Respondent(s), and/or witness(es) to knowingly making false statements or knowingly submitting false information during the grievance process, including intentionally making a false report of Sexual

Packet page 17 of 126 Harassment or submitting a false Formal Complaint. The Board will not tolerate such conduct, which is a violation of the Student Code of Conduct ( ) and the Employee/Administrator Handbook.

The Respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct until a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the grievance process.

Timeline

The District will seek to conclude the grievance process, including resolving any appeals, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the Formal Complaint.

If the Title IX Coordinator offers informal resolution processes, the informal resolution processes may not be used by the Complainant or Respondent to unduly delay the investigation and determination of responsibility. The timeline, however, may be subject to a temporary delay of the grievance process or a limited extension for good cause with written notice to the Complainant and the Respondent of the delay or extension and the reasons for the action. Good cause may include considerations such as the absence of a party, a party’s advisor, or a witness; concurrent law enforcement activity; and the need for language assistance or accommodation of disabilities. (X) The Title IX Coordinator will provide the parties with reasonable updates on the status of the grievance process.

Upon receipt of a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Coordinator will provide written notice of the following to the parties who are known:

A. Notice of the Board’s grievance process, including any informal resolution processes;

B. Notice of the allegations of misconduct that potentially constitutes Sexual Harassment as defined in this policy, including sufficient details known at the time and with sufficient time to prepare a response before any initial interview. Sufficient details include the identities of the parties involved in the incident, if known, the conduct allegedly constituting Sexual Harassment, and the date and location of the alleged incident, if known. The written notice must:

1. include a statement that the Respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct and that a determination regarding responsibility will be made at the conclusion of the grievance process;

2. inform the parties that they may have an advisor of their choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, and may inspect and review evidence.

3. inform the parties of any provision in the Student Code of Conduct (X), this policy, ( ) and/or Employee/Administrator Handbook that prohibits knowingly making false statements or knowingly submitting false information during the grievance process.

If, during the course of the investigation, the investigator becomes aware of allegations about the Complainant or Respondent that are not included in the original notice provided to the parties, the investigator will notify the Title IX Coordinator and the Title IX Coordinator will decide whether the investigator should investigate the additional allegations; if the Title IX Coordinator decides to include the new allegations as part of the investigation, the Title IX Coordinator will provide notice of the additional allegations to the parties whose identities are known.

Dismissal of a Formal Complaint

The District shall investigate the allegations in a Formal Complaint, unless the conduct alleged in the Formal Complaint:

A. would not constitute Sexual Harassment (as defined in this policy) even if proved;

B. did not occur in the District’s education program or activity; or

C. did not occur against a person in the United States.

If one of the preceding circumstances exist, the Title IX Coordinator shall dismiss the Formal Complaint. If the Title IX Coordinator dismisses the Formal Complaint due to one of the preceding reasons, the District may still investigate and take action with respect to such alleged misconduct pursuant to another provision of an applicable code of conduct, Board policy, and/or Employee/Administrator Handbook.

Packet page 18 of 126 The Title IX Coordinator may dismiss a Formal Complaint, or any allegations therein, if at any time during the investigation ( ) or hearing:

A. a Complainant notifies the Title IX Coordinator in writing that the Complainant would like to withdraw the Formal Complaint or any allegations therein;

B. the Respondent is no longer enrolled in the District or employed by the Board; or

C. specific circumstances prevent the District from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination as to the Formal Complaint or allegations therein.

If the Title IX Coordinator dismisses a Formal Complaint or allegations therein, the Title IX Coordinator must promptly send written notice of the dismissal and the reason(s) therefor simultaneously to the parties.

Consolidation of Formal Complaints

The Title IX Coordinator may consolidate Formal Complaints as to allegations of Sexual Harassment against more than one Respondent, or by more than one Complainant against one or more Respondents, or by one party against the other party, where the allegations of Sexual Harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances.

Where a grievance process involves more than one Complainant or more than one Respondent, references in this policy to the singular ‘‘party,’’ ‘‘Complainant,’’ or ‘‘Respondent’’ include the plural, as applicable.

Informal Resolution Process

Under no circumstances shall a Complainant be required as a condition of enrollment or continuing enrollment, or employment or continuing employment, or enjoyment of any other right, to waive any right to an investigation and adjudication of a Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment. Similarly, no party shall be required to participate in an informal resolution process.

If a Formal Complaint is filed, the Title IX Coordinator may offer to the parties an informal resolution process. If the parties mutually agree to participate in the informal resolution process, the Title IX Coordinator shall designate a trained individual to facilitate an informal resolution process, such as mediation, that does not involve a full investigation and adjudication. The informal resolution process may be used at any time prior to the decision-maker(s) reaching a determination regarding responsibility.

If the Title IX Coordinator is going to propose an informal resolution process, the Title IX Coordinator shall provide to the parties a written notice disclosing:

A. the allegations;

B. the requirements of the informal resolution process including the circumstances under which it precludes the parties from resuming a Formal Complaint arising from the same allegations; and

C. any consequences resulting from participating in the informal resolution process, including the records that will be maintained or could be shared.

Any time prior to agreeing to a resolution, any party has the right to withdraw from the informal resolution process and resume the grievance process with respect to the Formal Complaint.

Before commencing the informal resolution process, the Title IX Coordinator shall obtain from the parties their voluntary, written consent to the informal resolution process.

During the pendency of the informal resolution process, the investigation and adjudication processes that would otherwise occur have stayed and all related deadlines are suspended.

The informal resolution process is not available to resolve allegations that a Board employee (X) or another adult member of the School District community or Third Party [END OF OPTION] sexually harassed a student.

[X] The informal resolution process is not available to resolve allegations involving a sexual assault involving a student Complainant and a student Respondent.

Investigation of a Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment

Packet page 19 of 126 In conducting the investigation of a Formal Complaint and throughout the grievance process, the burden of proof and the burden of gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination regarding responsibility is on the District, not the parties.

In making the determination of responsibility, the decision-maker(s) is(are) directed to use the (X) preponderance of the evidence standard (X) clear and convincing evidence standard. The decision-maker(s) is charged with considering the totality of all available evidence, from all relevant sources.

The District is not permitted to access, consider, disclose, or otherwise use a party’s records that are made or maintained by a physician, psychiatrist, psychologist, or other recognized professional or paraprofessional acting in the professional’s or paraprofessional’s capacity, or assisting in that capacity, and which are made and maintained in connection with the provision of treatment to the party, unless the party provides the District with voluntary, written consent to do so; if a student party is not an Eligible Student, the District must obtain the voluntary, written consent of a parent.

Similarly, the investigator(s) and decision-maker(s) may not require, allow, rely upon or otherwise use questions or evidence that constitute, or seek disclosure of, information protected under a legally recognized privilege, unless the person holding such privilege has waived the privilege in writing.

As part of the investigation, the parties have the right to:

A. present witnesses, including fact and expert witnesses, and other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence; and

B. have others present during any grievance proceeding, including the opportunity to be accompanied to any related meeting or proceeding by the advisor of their choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney. The District may not limit the choice or presence of an advisor for either the Complainant or Respondent in any meeting or grievance proceeding.

( ) The District establishes the following restrictions, which apply equally to both parties, regarding the extent to which an advisor may participate in the proceedings:

______

______

______

( ) Board Policy 2461 – Recording of District Meetings Involving Students and/or Parents controls whether a person is allowed to audio record or video record any meeting or grievance proceeding.

Neither party shall be restricted in their ability to discuss the allegations under investigation or to gather and present relevant evidence.

The District will provide to a party whose participation is invited or expected written notice of the date, time, location, participants, and purpose of all ( ) hearings, investigative interviews, or other meetings, with sufficient time for the party to prepare to participate. ( ) The investigator(s) and decision-maker(s) must provide a minimum of _____ days’ notice with respect to investigative interviews and other meetings ( ) and ___ days' notice with respect to hearings

Both parties shall have an equal opportunity to inspect and review any evidence obtained as part of the investigation that is directly related to the allegations raised in the Formal Complaint, including the evidence upon which the District does not intend to rely in reaching a determination regarding responsibility and inculpatory or exculpatory evidence whether obtained from a party or other source, so that each party can meaningfully respond to the evidence prior to the conclusion of the investigation.

Prior to completion of the investigative report, the (X) investigator ( ) Title IX Coordinator will send to each party and the party’s advisor, if any, the evidence subject to inspection and review in an electronic format or a hard copy, and the parties will have at least ten (10) calendar days to submit a written response, which the investigator will consider prior to completion of the investigative report. ( ) The District will make all such evidence subject to the parties’ inspection and review available at any hearing to give each party equal opportunity to refer to such evidence during the hearing, including for purposes of cross-examination.

At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigator shall create an investigative report that fairly summarizes relevant evidence and send the report to each party and the party’s advisor, if any, for their review and written response. The investigator will send the investigative report in an electronic format or a hard copy, at least ten (10) calendar days prior to

Packet page 20 of 126 (X) the decision-maker(s) issuing a determination regarding responsibility.

( ) a hearing or the decision-maker(s) issuing a determination regarding responsibility.

Determination of Responsibility

The Title IX Coordinator shall appoint a decision-maker(s) to issue a determination of responsibility. The decision-maker(s) cannot be the same person(s) as the Title IX Coordinator(s) or the investigator(s).

[x] OPTION 1

After the investigator sends the investigative report to the parties and the decision-maker(s), and before the decision-maker(s) reaches a determination regarding responsibility, the decision-maker(s) will afford each party the opportunity to submit written, relevant questions that a party wants asked of any party or witness, provide each party with the answers, and allow for additional, limited follow-up questions from each party. The decision-maker(s) must explain to the party proposing the questions any decision to exclude a question as not relevant.

Questions and evidence about the Complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior are not relevant, unless such questions and evidence about the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior are offered to prove that someone other than the Respondent committed the conduct alleged by the Complainant, or if the questions and evidence concern specific incidents of the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the Respondent and are offered to prove consent. The decision-maker(s) must explain to the party proposing the questions any decision to exclude a question as not relevant.

[END OF OPTION 1]

[ ] OPTION 2

After the investigator sends the investigative report to the parties and the decision-maker(s), and prior to the decision-maker(s) issuing a determination of responsibility, the decision-maker(s) ( ) may ( ) will conduct a hearing.

[ ] Option A

If the decision-maker(s) decides not to conduct a hearing, the decision-maker(s) will state in writing the reason for not conducting a hearing and provide that explanation to the parties. Additionally, before the decision-maker(s) reaches a determination regarding responsibility, the decision-maker(s) will afford each party the opportunity to submit written, relevant questions that a party wants asked of any party or witness, provide each party with the answers, and allow for additional, limited follow-up questions from each party. The decision-maker(s) must explain to the party proposing the questions any decision to exclude a question as not relevant.

If the decision-maker(s) elects to conduct a hearing, the hearing will proceed as follows:

[END OF OPTION A]

[ ] Option B

The hearing will proceed as follows:

[END OF OPTION B]

[ ] Option C

At the hearing, the decision-maker(s) will allow each party or each party’s advisor to submit relevant questions to the decision- maker(s) who will ask the questions to the other party and any witnesses. Before a Complainant, Respondent, or witness answers a cross-examination or other question, the decision-maker(s) must first determine whether the question is relevant and explain any decision to exclude a question as not relevant. Only relevant cross-examination and other questions, including follow-up questions and questions challenging credibility, will be permitted. Such cross-examination and questioning at the live hearing shall be conducted orally and in real time.

[ ] If a party does not have an advisor present at the live hearing, the District will provide, without fee or charge to that party, an advisor of the District’s choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, to submit questions on behalf of that party.

[END OF OPTION C]

Packet page 21 of 126

[ ] Option D

Prior to commencing the hearing, the decision-maker(s) will decide whether to allow each party’s advisor to ask questions directly of the other party and any witnesses, or instead to have the questions submitted to the decision-maker(s) who will ask the other party and any witnesses the questions.

If the decision-maker(s) permits each party’s advisor to ask the other party and any witnesses relevant questions and follow-up questions, including questions challenging credibility, such cross-examination at the live hearing will be conducted directly, orally, and in real time by the party’s advisor of choice and never by a party personally. If the decision-maker(s) permit each party’s advisor to ask questions directly to the other party and any witnesses, the decision-maker(s) shall not restrict the extent to which advisors may participate in the hearing.

If, on the other hand, the decision-maker(s) decides to have each party’s advisor (or the party, if the party does not have an advisor) submit relevant questions to the decision-maker(s), the decision-maker will ask the questions to the other party and any witnesses. Such cross-examination at the hearing will be conducted orally and in real time by the decision-maker(s) based upon questions submitted by a party’s advisor or the party.

Only relevant cross-examination and other questions may be asked of a party or witness. Before a Complainant, Respondent, or witness answers a cross-examination or other question, the decision-maker(s) must first determine whether the question is relevant and explain any decision to exclude a question as not relevant.

If the decision-maker(s) permits the parties’ advisors to ask the questions directly, and a party does not have an advisor present at the live hearing, the District will provide, without fee or charge to that party, an advisor of the District’s choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, to conduct cross-examination on behalf of that party.

[ ] If the decision-maker(s) decides not to have the parties’ advisors ask the questions directly, and a party does not have an advisor present at the hearing, the District will provide, without fee or charge to that party, an advisor of the District’s choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, to submit questions on behalf of that party.

[END OF OPTION D]

[ ] Option E

At the hearing, the decision-maker(s) shall permit each party’s advisor to ask the other party and any witnesses all relevant questions and follow-up questions, including those challenging credibility. Such cross-examination at the hearing must be conducted directly, orally, and in real time by the party’s advisor of choice and never by a party personally; notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this policy, the decision-maker shall not restrict the extent to which advisors may participate in the hearing.

Only relevant cross-examination and other questions may be asked of a party or witness. Before a Complainant, Respondent, or witness answers a cross-examination or other question, the decision-maker(s) must first determine whether the question is relevant and explain any decision to exclude a question as not relevant.

If a party does not have an advisor present at the hearing, the District will provide, without fee or charge to that party, an advisor of the District’s choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, to conduct cross-examination on behalf of that party.

[END OF OPTION E]

Questions and evidence about the Complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior are not relevant, unless such questions and evidence about the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior are offered to prove that someone other than the Respondent committed the conduct alleged by the Complainant, or if the questions and evidence concern specific incidents of the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the Respondent and are offered to prove consent.

If a party or witness does not submit to cross-examination at the hearing, the decision-maker(s) must not rely on any statement of that party or witness in reaching a determination regarding responsibility; provided, however, that the decision-maker(s) cannot draw an inference about the determination regarding responsibility based solely on a party’s or witness’s absence from the hearing or refusal to answer cross-examination or other questions.

Hearings may be conducted with all parties physically present in the same geographic location or, at the discretion of the ( ) decision-maker(s) ( ) Title IX Coordinator(s), any or all parties, witnesses, and other participants may appear at the hearing virtually, with technology enabling participants simultaneously to see and hear each other. At the request of either party, the decision-maker shall provide for the hearing to occur with the parties located in separate rooms with technology enabling the decision-maker(s) and parties to simultaneously see and hear the party or witness answering questions. The District will create an audio or audiovisual recording, or transcript, of any hearing and make it available to the parties for inspection and review.

Packet page 22 of 126 [END OF OPTION 2]

Determination regarding responsibility: The decision-maker(s) will issue a written determination regarding responsibility. To reach this determination, the decision-maker(s) must apply the (X) preponderance of the evidence standard (X) clear and convincing evidence standard.

The written determination will include the following content:

A. identification of the allegations potentially constituting Sexual Harassment pursuant to this policy;

B. a description of the procedural steps taken from the receipt of the Formal Complaint through the determination, including any notifications to the parties, interviews with parties and witnesses, site visits, [and] methods used to gather other evidence, ( ) and hearings held;

C. findings of fact supporting the determination;

D. Conclusions regarding the application of the applicable code of conduct to the facts;

E. a statement of, and rationale for, the result as to each allegation, including a determination regarding responsibility, any disciplinary sanctions the decision-maker(s) is recommending that the District impose on the Respondent(s), and whether remedies designed to restore or preserve equal access to the District’s education program or activity should be provided by the District to the Complainant(s); and

F. the procedures and permissible bases for the Complainant(s) and Respondent(s) to appeal.

The following disciplinary sanctions/consequences may be imposed on a student Respondent who is determined responsible for violating this policy (i.e., engaging in Sexual Harassment):

A. Informal Discipline

1. (X) writing assignments;

2. (X) changing of seating or location:

3. (X) pre-school, (X) lunchtime, (X) after-school detention;

4. (X) in-school discipline;

5. (X) Saturday school;

B. Formal Discipline

1. suspension of bus riding/transportation privileges;

2. removal from co-curricular and/or extra-curricular activity(ies), including athletics;

3. emergency removal;

4. suspension for up to ten (10) school days;

5. long-term suspension or expulsion;

6. any other sanction authorized by the Student Code of Conduct.

If the decision-maker(s) determines the student Respondent is responsible for violating this policy (i.e., engaging in Sexual Harassment), the decision-maker(s) will recommend appropriate remedies, including disciplinary sanctions/consequences. The Title IX Coordinator will notify the Superintendent of the recommended remedies, so an authorized administrator can consider the recommendation(s) and implement an appropriate remedy(ies) in compliance with Policy 5600 – Student Discipline, Policy 5605 – Suspension/Expulsion of Students with Disabilities, Policy 5610 – Emergency Removal, Suspension, and Expulsion of Students, Policy 5610.02 - In-School Discipline, and Policy 5611 – Due Process Rights. Discipline of a student Respondent must comply with the

Packet page 23 of 126 applicable provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) and/or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1972, and their respective implementing regulations.

The following disciplinary sanctions/consequences may be imposed on an employee Respondent who is determined responsible for violating this policy (i.e., engaging in Sexual Harassment):

A. (X) oral or written warning;

B. (X) written reprimands;

C. (X) performance improvement plan;

D. (X) required counseling;

E. (X) required training or education;

F. (X) demotion;

G. (X) suspension with pay;

H. suspension without pay;

I. termination, and any other sanction authorized by any applicable Employee/Administrator Handbook and/or collective bargaining agreement.

If the decision-maker(s) determines the employee Respondent is responsible for violating this policy (i.e., engaging in Sexual Harassment), the decision-maker(s) will recommend appropriate remedies, including disciplinary sanctions/consequences. The Title IX Coordinator will notify the Superintendent of the recommended remedies, so an authorized administrator can consider the recommendation(s) and implement an appropriate remedy(ies) in compliance with applicable due process procedures, whether statutory or contractual.

Discipline of an employee will be implemented in accordance with Federal and State law, Board policy, and applicable provisions of any relevant collective bargaining agreement.

The following disciplinary sanctions/consequences may be imposed on a non-student/non-employee member of the School District community or Third Party who is determined responsible for violating this policy (i.e., engaging in Sexual Harassment):

A. (X) oral or written warning;

B. (X) suspension or termination/cancellation of the Board’s contract with the third-party vendor or contractor;

C. (X) mandatory monitoring of the third-party while on school property and/or while working/interacting with students;

D. (X) restriction/prohibition on the third-party’s ability to be on school property; and

E. any combination of the same.

If the decision-maker(s) determines the third-party Respondent is responsible for violating this policy (i.e., engaging in Sexual Harassment), the decision-maker(s) will recommend appropriate remedies, including imposition of sanctions. The Title IX Coordinator will notify the Superintendent of the recommended remedies, so appropriate action can be taken.

The decision-maker(s) will provide the written determination to the Title IX Coordinator who will provide the written determination to the parties simultaneously.

In ultimately, imposing a disciplinary sanction/consequence, the Superintendent will consider the severity of the incident, previous disciplinary violations (if any), and any mitigating circumstances.

The District’s resolution of a Formal Complaint ordinarily will not be impacted by the fact that criminal charges involving the same incident have been filed or that charges have been dismissed or reduced.

At any point in the grievance process, the Superintendent/designee may involve local law enforcement and/or file criminal charges related to allegations of Sexual Harassment that involve a sexual assault.

Packet page 24 of 126

The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for effective implementation of any remedies.

Appeal

Both parties have the right to file an appeal from a determination regarding responsibility, or from the Title IX Coordinator’s dismissal of a Formal Complaint or any allegations therein, on the following bases:

A. Procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of the matter (e.g., material deviation from established procedures);

B. New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal was made, that could affect the outcome of the matter; and

C. The Title IX Coordinator, investigator(s), or decision-maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against Complainants or Respondents generally or the individual Complainant(s) or Respondent(s) that affected the outcome of the matter.

D. ( ) The recommended remedies (including disciplinary sanctions/consequences) are unreasonable in light of the findings of fact (i.e., the nature and severity of the Sexual Harassment).

E. ( ) ______

[X] The Complainant(s) may not challenge the ultimate disciplinary sanction/consequence that is imposed.

Any party wishing to appeal the decision-maker(s)’s determination of responsibility, or the Title IX Coordinator’s dismissal of a Formal Complaint or any allegations therein, must submit a written appeal to the Title IX Coordinator within three (3) days after receipt of the decision-maker(s)’s determination of responsibility or the Title IX Coordinator’s dismissal of a Formal Complaint or any allegations therein.

Nothing herein shall prevent the Superintendent from imposing any remedy, including disciplinary sanction, while the appeal is pending.

As to all appeals, the Title IX Coordinator will notify the other party in writing when an appeal is filed and implement appeal procedures equally for both parties.

The decision-maker(s) for the appeal shall not be the same person(s) as the decision-maker(s) that reached the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal, the investigator(s), or the Title IX Coordinator(s). The decision-maker(s) for the appeal shall not have a conflict of interest or bias for or against Complainants or Respondents generally or an individual Complainant(s) or Respondent(s) and shall receive the same training as required of other decision-makers.

Both parties shall have a reasonable, equal opportunity to submit a written statement in support of, or challenging, the outcome.

[OPTION 1] The decision-maker(s) for the appeal shall determine when each party’s written statement is due. [END OF OPTION 1]

[X}[OPTION 2] The parties’ written statements in support of, or challenging, the determination of responsibility must be submitted within five (5) days after the Title IX Coordinator provides notice to the non-appealing party of the appeal. [END OF OPTION 2]

[OPTION 3] The appealing party’s written statement must be submitted within ____ days after the Title IX Coordinator receives notice of the appeal. The other party’s written statement must be submitted within ____ days after the Title IX Coordinator provides that party a copy of the appealing party’s written statement. ( ) The appealing party will have ___ days to submit a rebuttal to the other party’s written statement.

[OPTION 4] Specifically, the appealing party must submit with the notice of appeal a written statement challenging the determination of responsibility. The nonappealing party shall have up to ____ days after receipt of the appealing party’s written statement to submit his/her written statement in support of the determination of responsibility. [END OF OPTION 4]

The decision-maker(s) for the appeal shall issue a written decision describing the result of the appeal and the rationale for the result. The original decision-makers(s’) determination of responsibility will stand if the appeal request is not filed in a timely manner or the appealing party fails to show clear error and/or a compelling rationale for overturning or modifying the original determination. The written decision will be provided to the Title IX Coordinator who will provide it simultaneously to both parties. The written decision will be issued within five (5) days of when the parties’ written statements were submitted.

Packet page 25 of 126 The determination of responsibility associated with a Formal Complaint, including any recommendations for remedies/disciplinary sanctions, becomes final when the time for filing an appeal has passed or, if an appeal is filed, at the point when the decision- maker(s) for the appeal’s decision is delivered to the Complainant and the Respondent. (X) No further review beyond the appeal is permitted.

Retaliation

Neither the Board nor any other person may intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by Title IX, its implementing regulations, or this policy, or because the individual made a report or complaint, testified, assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this policy. Intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination, including charges against an individual for code of conduct violations that do not involve sex discrimination or Sexual Harassment, but arise out of the same facts or circumstances as a report or complaint of sex discrimination, or a report or Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment, for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by Title IX, its implementing regulations, or this policy, constitutes retaliation. Retaliation against a person for making a report of Sexual Harassment, filing a Formal Complaint, or participating in an investigation ( ) and/or hearing , is a serious violation of this policy that can result in imposition of disciplinary sanctions/consequences and/or other appropriate remedies.

Complaints alleging retaliation may be filed according to the grievance process set forth above.

The exercise of rights protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution does not constitute retaliation prohibited under this policy.

Charging an individual with a code of conduct violation for making a materially false statement in bad faith in the course of a grievance proceeding under this policy shall not constitute retaliation, provided, however, that a determination regarding responsibility, alone, is not sufficient to conclude that any party made a materially false statement in bad faith.

Confidentiality

The District will keep confidential the identity of any individual who has made a report or complaint of sex discrimination, including any individual who has made a report or filed a Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment, any Complainant, any individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of sex discrimination, any Respondent, and any witness, except as may be permitted by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act ("FERPA"), 20 U.S.C. 1232g, or FERPA regulations, 34 CFR part 99, or as required by law, or to carry out the purposes of 34 CFR part 106, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding arising thereunder (i.e., the District’s obligation to maintain confidentiality shall not impair or otherwise affect the Complainant’s and Respondent’s receipt of the information to which they are entitled related to the investigative record and determination of responsibility).

Application of the First Amendment

The Board will construe and apply this policy consistent with the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ( ) and the principles of academic freedom as set forth in the applicable collective bargaining agreement. In no case will a Respondent be found to have committed Sexual Harassment based on expressive conduct that is protected by the First Amendment ( ) and/or the principles of academic freedom specified in the Board’s collective bargaining agreement with its teachers.

Training

The District’s Title IX Coordinator, along with any investigator(s), decision-maker(s), or person(s) designated to facilitate an informal resolution process, must receive training on:

A. the definition of Sexual Harassment (as that term is used in this policy);

B. the scope of the District’s education program or activity;

C. how to conduct an investigation and implement the grievance process ( ) that includes hearings, appeals and informal resolution processes, as applicable; and

D. how to serve impartially, including by avoiding prejudgment of the facts at issue, conflicts of interests, and bias.

[X] All Board employees will be trained concerning their legal obligation to report Sexual Harassment to the Title IX Coordinator. This training will include practical information about how to identify and report Sexual Harassment.

Recordkeeping

Packet page 26 of 126

As part of its response to alleged violations of this policy, the District shall create, and maintain for a period of seven (7) calendar years, records of any actions, including any supportive measures, taken in response to a report or Formal Complaint of Sexual Harassment. In each instance, the District shall document the basis for its conclusion that its response was not deliberately indifferent, and document that it has taken measures designed to restore or preserve equal access to the District’s education program or activity. If the District does not provide a Complainant with supportive measures, then the District will document the reasons why such a response was not clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances. The documentation of certain bases or measures does not limit the District in the future from providing additional explanations or detailing additional measures taken.

The District shall maintain for a period of seven (7) calendar years the following records:

A. each Sexual Harassment investigation including any determination regarding responsibility ( ) and any audio or audiovisual recording or transcript that is made of any hearing, any disciplinary sanctions recommended and/or imposed on the Respondent(s), and any remedies provided to the Complainant(s) designed to restore or preserve equal access to the District’s education program or activity

B. any appeal and the result therefrom

C. any informal resolution and the result therefrom, and

D. all materials used to train Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decision makers, and any person who facilitates an informal resolution process.

The District will make its training materials publicly available on its website. (X) If a person is unable to access the District’s website, the Title IX Coordinator will make the training materials available upon request for inspection by members of the public.

Outside Appointments, Dual Appointments, and Delegations

The Board retains discretion to appoint suitably qualified persons who are not Board employees to fulfill any function of the Board under this policy, including, but not limited to, Title IX Coordinator, investigator, decision-maker, decision-maker for appeals, facilitator of informal resolution processes, and advisor.

The Board also retains discretion to appoint two or more persons to jointly fulfill the role of Title IX Coordinator, investigator, decision-maker, decision-maker for appeals, facilitator of informal resolution processes, and advisor.

The Superintendent may delegate functions assigned to a specific Board employee under this policy, including but not limited to the functions assigned to the Title IX Coordinator, investigator, decision-maker, decision-maker for appeals, facilitator of informal resolution processes, and advisor, to any suitably qualified individual and such delegation may be rescinded by the Superintendent at any time.

[ ] Discretion in Application

The Board retains discretion to interpret and apply this policy in a manner that is not clearly unreasonable, even if the Board’s interpretation or application differs from the interpretation of any specific Complainant and/or Respondent.

Despite the Board’s reasonable efforts to anticipate all eventualities in drafting this policy, it is possible unanticipated or extraordinary circumstances may not be specifically or reasonably addressed by the express policy language, in which case the Board retains discretion to respond to the unanticipated or extraordinary circumstance in a way that is not clearly unreasonable.

The provisions of this policy are not contractual in nature, whether in their own right, or as part of any other express or implied contract. Accordingly, the Board retains discretion to revise this policy at any time, and for any reason. The Board may apply policy revisions to an active case provided that doing so is not clearly unreasonable.

© Neola 2020

Packet page 27 of 126 Legal 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX) 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq., The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEIA)

42 U.S.C. 2000c et seq., Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.

42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.

42 U.S.C. 1983

34 C.F.R. Part 106 OCR’s Revised Sexual Harassment Guidance (2001)

20 U.S.C. 1092(F)(6)(A)(v)

34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(10)

34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(8)

34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(30)

Packet page 28 of 126 Action Item # 21-02-47 Board Meeting: February 23, 2021

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Plymouth, Michigan

M E M O

MEMO TO: Members of the Board of Education Monica Merritt, Superintendent

FROM: Kurt Tyszkiewicz, Executive Director of Student Services

DATE: February 19, 2021

SUBJECT: Policy #2410 - Prohibition of Referral or Assistance

Date to Administrator for review Au gust, 2020 Reviewed by: Kurt Tyszkiewicz

Date reviewed and approved by the Policy Advisory Committee: January 26, 2021

This policy from NEOLA: reflects current state of the law and should be adopted to have accurate X policies is recommended but not required

is optional

This policy is being brought to the Board of Education for second reading.

KEY IDEA:

On May 6, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) released its Final Rule, which amends existing Title IX regulations – the Department’s first action of its kind in decades. The Final Rule, which encompasses both the amended regulations and accompanying commentary, exceed 2,000 pages, and are scheduled to take effect on August 14, 2020. The regulations bring sweeping changes to how educational institutions address, investigate, and adjudicate allegations of sexual harassment occurring within their programs and activities. These changes include jurisdictional changes based on the definition of sexual harassment and of educational programs and activities in the Final Rule.

RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION

It was moved by member ______and seconded by member ______to approve the second reading of Policy 2410 for the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools.

Ayes: ______

Nays: ______

The Motion was: ______

Attachments _X__ New/Revised/Replacement Bylaw _ _ Current Policy

Packet page 29 of 126

Book Policy Manual

Section Disposition Sheets

Title PROHIBITION OF REFERRAL OR ASSISTANCE

Code po2410

Status

Adopted September 24, 2019

2410 - PROHIBITION OF REFERRAL OR ASSISTANCE

In accordance with Michigan statute, any officer, agent, or employee of the Board of Education is prohibited from referring a student for an abortion or assisting a student in obtaining an abortion.

Whenever it becomes necessary to discipline a member of the staff for violation of this policy, the Superintendent shall utilize related procedures described in the Staff Discipline Policy 1439, Policy 3139, and Policy 4139 or the current negotiated agreement, if applicable.

Using due-process procedures, the Superintendent shall conduct an investigation, as appropriate to the situation, including providing the employee with reasonable notice and the opportunity to respond. If it is determined that any officer, agent, or employee of the Board has violated this policy, the Board shall apply a financial penalty against such individual that is equivalent to not less than three percent (3%) of that individual's annual compensation.

The District shall refund to the State School Aid fund an amount of money equal to the amount of the penalty or fine.

In accordance with Michigan statute, any school official, member of the Board of Education, or employee of the Board who is not the parent or the legal guardian of the student involved is prohibited from referring a student for an abortion or assisting a student in obtaining an abortion. Any school official, member of the Board, or employee of the Board who violates this policy is subject to disciplinary action.

Any alleged violation of this policy shall be reported to the Superintendent, who shall follow the procedures set out in Policy 1439, Policy 3139, Policy 4139 or the current negotiated bargaining agreement, whichever is applicable, to investigate the allegation. If the allegation relates to a school official, member of the Board, or employee of the Board to whom Policy 1439, Policy 3139, Policy 4139 or a current negotiated bargaining agreement does not apply, the Superintendent shall conduct an investigation, as appropriate to the situation, including providing the person with reasonable notice and the opportunity to respond. All disciplinary measures available under Board Policy 1439, Policy 3139 or Policy 4139 may be utilized, as appropriate, if the Superintendent determines that a violation of this policy occurred.

© Neola 20172019

Legal M.C.L. 388.1766

Packet page 30 of 126 Action Item # 21-02-47 Board Meeting: February 23, 2021

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Plymouth, Michigan

M E M O

MEMO TO: Members of the Board of Education Monica Merritt, Superintendent

FROM: Kurt Tyszkiewicz, Executive Director of Student Services

DATE: February 19, 2021

SUBJECT: Policy #2414 - Reproductive Health and Family Planning

Date to Administrator for review Au gust, 2020 Reviewed by: Kurt Tyszkiewicz

Date reviewed and approved by the Policy Advisory Committee: January 26, 2021

This policy from NEOLA: reflects current state of the law and should be adopted to have accurate X policies is recommended but not required

is optional

This policy is being brought to the Board of Education for second reading.

KEY IDEA: Revisions to this policy is in response to recent legislative action which included an amendment to State School Aid Act Section 166 (MCL 388.1766), with immediate effect. As amended, Section 166 requires school boards to adopt and implement a policy that prohibits school officials, board members, and school employees from referring a student for an abortion or assisting a student in obtaining an abortion. Parents/legal guardians of such a student are not subject to this policy. Failure to adopt such a policy is no longer subject to a $100,000 forfeiture of state aid, but rather, a violation of Section 166 will be enforced through a complaint procedure, which could result in a 1% forfeiture of state aid, if the violation is substantiated by MDE. As amended, Section 166 no longer includes "other persons" in the prohibition, nor does it impose a fine against an employee who violates the policy.

This revised policy reflects the current state of the law and should be adopted in order to maintain accurate policies and guidelines.

RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION

It was moved by member ______and seconded by member ______to approve the second reading of Policy 2414 for the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools.

Ayes: ______

Nays: ______

The Motion was: ______

Attachments _X__ New/Revised/Replacement Bylaw _ _ Current Policy

Packet page 31 of 126

Book Policy Manual

Section Disposition Sheets

Title REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND FAMILY PLANNING

Code po2414

Status

Adopted August 23, 1993

Last Revised September 24, 2019

2414 - REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND FAMILY PLANNING

The Board of Education directs that instruction be provided on the principal modes by which dangerous communicable diseases, including HIV and AIDS, are spread and the best methods for the restriction and prevention of these diseases. The instruction shall stress that abstinence from sex is the only protection that is 100% effective against unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV and AIDS, and that abstinence is a positive lifestyle for unmarried young people.

No person shall dispense or otherwise distribute in a District school or on District school property a family planning drug or device. Additionally, any school official, member of the Board, or employee of the Board who is not the parent or the legal guardian of the student involved is prohibited from referring a student for an abortion. Additionally, any officer, agent, or employee of the Board is prohibited from referring a student for an abortion or assisting a student in obtaining an abortion.

Each person who teaches K to 12 students about human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome shall have training in human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome education for young people. Licensed health care professionals who have received training on human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome are exempt from this requirement.

The District shall notify the parents, in advance of the instruction and about the content of the instruction, give the parents an opportunity, prior to instruction, to review the materials to be used (other than tests), as well as the opportunity to observe the instruction, and advise the parents of their right to have their child excused from the instruction.

Before any revisions to the curriculum on the subjects taught pursuant to M.C.L. 380.1169 are implemented, the Board shall hold at least two (2) public hearings on the proposed revisions. The hearings shall be held at least one (1) week apart and public notice of the hearings shall be given in the manner required for board meetings. A public hearing held pursuant to this section may be held in conjunction with a public hearing held pursuant to M.C.L. 380.1507.

© Neola 2019

Legal M.C.L. 380.1169, 380.1507, 388.1766 A.C. Rule 388.273 et seq.

Packet page 32 of 126 Action Item # 21-02-47 Board Meeting: February 23, 2021

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Plymouth, Michigan

M E M O

MEMO TO: Members of the Board of Education Monica Merritt, Superintendent

FROM: Kurt Tyszkiewicz, Executive Director of Student Services

DATE: February 19, 2021

SUBJECT: Policy #5517.02 - Sexual Violence (Rescind-Delete)

Date to Administrator for review Au gust, 2020 Reviewed by: Kurt Tyszkiewicz

Date reviewed and approved by the Policy Advisory Committee: January 26, 2021

This policy from NEOLA: reflects current state of the law and should be adopted to have accurate X policies is recommended but not required

is optional

This policy is being brought to the Board of Education for second reading.

KEY IDEA:

This policy should be rescinded as this policy is being covered in the recommended changes in Policy 2266 - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities.

RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION

It was moved by member ______and seconded by member ______to approve the rescinding of Policy 5517.02 for the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools.

Ayes: ______

Nays: ______

The Motion was: ______

Attachments _X__ New/Revised/Replacement Bylaw _ _ Current Policy

Packet page 33 of 126

Book Policy Manual

Section Disposition Sheets

Title Rescind/Delete SEXUAL VIOLENCE

Code po5517.02

Status

Adopted April 30, 2019

5517.02 - SEXUAL VIOLENCE The Board of Education does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex (including sexual orientation or transgender identity), disability, age (except as authorized by law), religion, military status, ancestry, or genetic information (collectively, "Protected Classes") in its education programs and activities. The Board is committed to maintaining an education and work environment that is free from all forms of unlawful harassment, including sexual harassment. Sexual harassment, including sexual violence, interferes with students’ rights to receive an education free from discrimination, and, in the case of sexual violence, is a crime. Pursuant to its Title IX obligations, the Board is committed to eliminating sexual violence in all forms and will take appropriate action against any individual found responsible for violating this policy. To further its commitment against sexual violence, the Board provides reporting options, an investigative and disciplinary process, and other related services as appropriate. This policy applies to all student complaints, whether filed by a student, his/her parent, an employee, or third party on the student’s behalf. It applies to all District operations, programs, and activities, as well as to unlawful conduct occurring on school property or during a Board-sponsored activity. All students, administrators, teachers, staff, and all other school personnel share responsibility for avoiding, discouraging, and reporting any form of unlawful harassment. Definitions Sexual Harassment As detailed further in Policy 5517, sexual harassment includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment may involve the behavior of a person of either gender against a person of the same or opposite gender. Examples include, but are not limited to:

A. unwelcome sexual propositions, invitations, solicitations, and flirtations; B. unwanted physical and/or sexual contact; C. threats or insinuations implying that a person's conditions of education may be adversely affected by not submitting to sexual advances; D. unwelcome sexual verbal expressions, including graphic sexual commentaries about a person's body, dress, appearance, or sexual activities; unwelcome sexually degrading language, jokes or innuendoes; unwelcome suggestive or insulting sounds or whistles; obscene telephone calls; E. sexually suggestive objects, pictures, videotapes, audio recordings or literature; F. unwelcome and inappropriate touching, patting, or pinching; obscene gestures;

G. a pattern of conduct, which can be subtle in nature, that has sexual overtones and is intended to create or has the effect of creating discomfort and/or humiliation to another; H. speculations about a person's sexual activities or sexual history, or remarks about one's own sexual activities or sexual history; I. inappropriate boundary invasions into a student's personal space and personal life; and J. verbal, nonverbal or physical aggression, intimidation, or hostility based on sex or sex-stereotyping that does not involve conduct of a sexual nature.

Sexual Violence Sexual violence, as used in this policy, refers to physical sexual acts perpetrated against a person’s will or where a person is incapable of giving consent (e.g., due to the student’s age, intellectual or other disability, or use of drugs or alcohol). Sexual violence includes rape, sexual assault, sexual battery, sexual abuse, and sexual coercion. Sexual violence can be carried out by school employees, other students, or third parties. All such acts of sexual violence are forms of sexual harassment and, in turn, sex discrimination prohibited by Title IX. Harassing conduct creates a hostile environment when it interferes with or limits a student’s ability to participate in or benefit from the school’s program. A single or isolated incident of sexual harassment may create a hostile environment if the incident is sufficiently severe. For example, a single instance of rape is sufficiently severe to create a hostile environment. Anti-Harassment Compliance Officers

Packet page 34 of 126 The Board designates the following individuals to serve as "Anti-Harassment Compliance Officers" for the District. They are hereinafter referred to as the "Compliance Officers." [NOTE: For the complainant’s comfort, districts are advised to appoint both a male and a female Compliance Officer. The Compliance Officers may also serve as the District's Section 504/ADA and Title IX Coordinators.] ______(Name) ______(School District Title) ______(Telephone Number) ______(Office Address) ______(E-mail Address) ______(Name) ______(School District Title) ______(Telephone Number) ______(Office Address) ______(E-mail Address) The names, titles, and contact information of these individuals will be published annually:

A. ( ) in the student, parent, and staff handbooks.

B. ( ) in the School District Annual Report to the public.

C. ( ) on the School District's web site.

D. ( ) on each individual school's web site.

E. ( ) in the School District's calendar.

F. ( ) ______.

The Compliance Officers are available during regular school/work hours to discuss Title IX questions, sexual violence concerns, and to assist students, other members of the School District community, and third parties. Compliance Officers shall accept sexual violence complaints directly from any members of the School District community or a visitor to the District, as well as those initially filed within a school building administrator. Upon receiving a complaint, the Compliance Officer or designee will discuss confidentiality issues with the complainant (and his/her parent, if the complainant is a minor), and open an investigation as described below. Complaint Procedures Reporting Students and Board employees are required, and parents, community members, and third parties are encouraged, to report sexual violence promptly to a teacher, administrator, supervisor, or other school official. Reports can be made orally or in writing, and should be as specific as possible. The person making the report shall identify the alleged victim, perpetrator(s), and witness(es), and describe in detail what occurred, including date(s), time(s), and location(s). The District, however, will investigate and address all reports to the extent possible. A student has a right to file criminal and/or Title IX complaints simultaneously. A student does not need to wait until the Title IX investigation is completed before filing a criminal complaint. Likewise, questions or complaints relating to sexual violence or any other Title IX concerns may also be filed with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. Any teacher, administrator, supervisor, or other school employee or official who receives such a complaint shall file it with the District’s Compliance Officer within two (2) school days, and shall comply with his/her mandatory reporting responsibilities. The Compliance Officer will oversee the District’s investigation and response to any Title IX-related complaints, but s/he may delegate the investigative process to another individual ("Designee"). The Board reserves the right to have the formal complaint investigation conducted by an external person in accordance with this policy. Confidentiality The District respects students’ privacy and will only disclose information regarding alleged sexual violence to individuals who are responsible for handling the school’s response, the student’s parents (if the student is a minor or is considered a dependent under Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code), or as otherwise required by law. During the course of a formal investigation, the Compliance Officer/designee will instruct all interviewees about the importance of maintaining confidentiality. Interviewees will be directed not to disclose any information that s/he learns or that s/he provides during the course of the investigation to third parties.

Packet page 35 of 126 Students or their parents sometimes ask that the students’ names not be disclosed to the alleged perpetrators or that no investigation or disciplinary action be pursued to address the alleged sexual violence. Upon such a request, the Compliance Officer/designee will inform the student and his/her parent that honoring the request may limit the District’s ability to respond fully to the incident, including pursuing disciplinary action against the alleged perpetrator. The official will also explain that Title IX includes protections against retaliation, and that school officials will not only take steps to prevent retaliation but also take strong responsive action if it occurs. Should the student or his/her parents continue to request complete confidentiality, the Compliance Officer/designee will balance the student’s privacy request with the District’s obligation to provide a safe and non-discriminatory environment for all students. Should the official determine that the District can honor the student’s or parent’s request and remain in compliance with its Federal and State obligations, the District may limit its investigation and/or formal action against the alleged perpetrator. The District will, however, take other action to address the sexual violence. This may include increasing monitoring and security, offering schedule changes, and conducting climate surveys. If the Compliance Officer/designee determines that the District must disclose the student’s identity to an alleged perpetrator, s/he will inform the student and his/her parents prior to disclosure. The District will then afford interim protection measures to the student as appropriate. Investigation The District is committed to investigating all sexual violence complaints in an adequate, reliable, impartial, and prompt manner. The investigation will seek to determine whether the conduct occurred, and if so, what actions the school will take to end the sexual violence, eliminate the hostile environment, prevent its recurrence, and remedy its effects. The investigation may include:

A. interviewing the complainant, perpetrator, and any witnesses; B. reviewing law enforcement investigation documents; C. reviewing student and personnel files; D. gathering and examining other relevant documents or evidence; and E. providing a disciplinary hearing as needed.

The District affords both parties a balanced and fair process. Specifically, the complainant has the same rights throughout the proceeding as the alleged perpetrator. Both parties, for example, will have an equal opportunity to present relevant witnesses and other evidence at a disciplinary hearing. Likewise, the District’s appeal process is available to both parties. The District, however, does not require complainants to be present for the hearing or appeal. Further, the District will not permit parties to personally question or cross-examine each other directly. [OPTION] [ ] Additionally:

A. ( ) The District permits both parties to have legal counsel or other advisors at any stage of the proceedings. Any restrictions on legal counsel participation apply to both parties equally.

B. ( ) The District permits both parties to submit third-party testimony.

C. ( ) The District permits both parties to be present for the entire hearing, but it will not require the complainant and alleged perpetrator to be present in the same room at the same time.

[END OF OPTION] In resolving a complaint, the District uses a preponderance of the evidence standard, determining whether it is more likely than not that sexual violence occurred. Timeline The Compliance Officer/designee must contact the student, if age eighteen (18) or older, or the student's parents if under the age eighteen (18), within two (2) school days after receipt of a report of sexual violence to advise s/he/them of the Board's intent to investigate the alleged misconduct. The Compliance Officer/designee will also inform the alleged perpetrator of the opportunity to submit a written response to the complaint within five (5) business days. The District’s investigation, including a disciplinary hearing process (but not appeal), may take up to sixty (60) calendar days to complete. This timeframe may be extended on a case-by-case basis, depending on the complexity and severity of the matter, criminal investigation requirements, and school breaks. During this period, the District will provide the complainant with periodic updates on the status of the investigation. Interim Measures During the investigation, the District will take interim steps to facilitate the complainant’s equal access to its education programs. These steps may include, but are not limited to: 1) notifying the complainant of his/her options to avoid contact with the alleged perpetrator; 2) allowing the complainant to change his/her academic, extracurricular, transportation, dining, and working situation as appropriate; and 3 ) informing complainant of other available resources, such as counseling, legal assistance, and victim advocacy. Specific interim measures will be considered and offered on a case-by-case basis. Notice Upon completing its investigation, the District will notify both parties in writing about the outcome of the complaint and any appeal. Specifically, the District will notify the complainant: 1) as to whether the investigation substantiated the allegations; 2) of individual remedies offered to the complainant; 3) of sanctions imposed on the perpetrator that directly relate to the complainant; and 4) other steps the District has taken to eliminate the hostile environment and prevent recurrence. The alleged perpetrator will be notified of the investigation’s result and disciplinary consequence to him/her, if any. The District will not notify the alleged

Packet page 36 of 126 perpetrator about the individual remedies afforded to the complainant. All aforementioned notifications will comply with Federal and State privacy laws, including the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Remedies The District will provide a prompt and equitable resolution. If the investigation substantiates the complaint, the District will take steps to end the sexual violence, eliminate the hostile environment, prevent its recurrence, and remedy its effects. In addition to imposing disciplinary consequences on the perpetrator, the District will consider the following individual and global remedies, on a case-by-case basis:

A. providing medical, counseling, and academic support services to the complainant and/or perpetrator; B. re-arranging schedules at the complainant’s request; C. affording the complainant extra time to complete or retake classes without academic penalty; D. reviewing any disciplinary proceedings against the complainant; E. training or retraining employees; F. developing materials on sexual violence;

G. conducting sexual violence prevention programs; and H. conducting climate checks.

The District will not offer mediation in cases involving sexual violence. Disciplinary consequences against offenders may include suspension, expulsion, termination, and any other sanctions the Board deems appropriate. Any discipline meted out to offenders will comply with special education and Section 504 laws and regulations. Appeals Process Both complainants and perpetrators may appeal the outcome of the investigation. Any appeal opportunities afforded to the alleged perpetrator are also afforded to the complainant. Any party wishing to appeal the outcome of the investigation must submit a written appeal to the Board within ten (10) school days after receipt of the written notice of the outcome of the investigation. The Board shall, within twenty (20) work days, conduct a hearing concerning the appeal. The Board shall provide a written decision to the appealing individual within ten (10) work days following completion of the hearing. Retaliation Federal law strictly prohibits retaliation against a complainant or witness. The District will inform complainant of this prohibition and direct him/her to report retaliation, whether by students or school officials, to the Compliance Officer. Upon learning of retaliation, school officials will take strong responsive action as appropriate. Training All staff will be trained so they know to report harassment to appropriate school officials. This training will include practical information about how to identify and report sexual harassment, including sexual violence. The training will be provided to any employees likely to witness or receive complaints involving sexual harassment and/or sexual violence, including teachers, school law enforcement unit employees or school resource officers, school administrators, school counselors, and health personnel. Further, school administrators responsible for investigating allegations of sexual harassment and sexual violence will be trained how to conduct such investigations and respond properly to such charges. Retention of Investigatory Records and Materials

All individuals charged with conducting investigations under this policy shall retain all documents, electronically stored information ("ESI"), and electronic media (as defined in Policy 8315) created and/or received as part of an investigation, which may include but not be limited to:

A. all written reports/allegations/complaints/grievances/ statements/responses pertaining to an alleged violation of this policy;

B. any narratives that memorialize oral reports/allegations/ complaints/grievances/statements/responses pertaining to an alleged violation of this policy;

C. any documentation that memorializes the actions taken by District personnel related to the investigation and/or the District’s response to the alleged violation of this policy;

D. written witness statements;

E. narratives, notes from, or audio, video, or digital recordings of witness interviews/statements;

F. e-mails, texts, or social media posts that directly relate to or constitute evidence pertaining to an alleged violation of this policy (i.e., not after-the-fact commentary about or media coverage of the incident);

G. notes or summaries prepared contemporaneously by the investigator in whatever form made (e.g., handwritten, keyed into a computer or tablet, etc.), but not including transitory notes whose content is otherwise memorialized in other documents;

H. written disciplinary sanctions issued to students or employees and other documentation that memorializes oral disciplinary sanctions issued to students or employees for violations of this policy;

Packet page 37 of 126 I. dated written determinations/reports (including summaries of relevant exculpatory and inculpatory evidence) and other documentation that memorializes oral notifications to the parties concerning the outcome of the investigation, including any consequences imposed as a result of a violation of this policy;

J. documentation of any interim measures offered and/or provided to complainants and/or the alleged perpetrators, including no contact orders issued to both parties, the dates the no contact orders were issued, and the dates the parties acknowledged receipt of the no contact orders;

K. documentation of all actions taken, both individual and systemic, to stop the discrimination or harassment, prevent its recurrence, eliminate any hostile environment, and remedy its discriminatory effects;

L. copies of the Board policy and/or procedures/guidelines used by the District to conduct the investigation, and any documents used by the District at the time of the alleged violation to communicate the Board’s expectations to students and staff with respect to the subject of this policy (e.g., Student and/or Employee Handbooks or Codes of Conduct);

M. copies of any documentation that memorializes any formal or informal resolutions to the alleged discrimination or harassment;

[DRAFTING NOTE: The following options should be selected if the district concludes that the following items are not adequately encompassed in the preceding paragraphs.]

N. ( ) documentation of any training provided to District personnel related to this policy, including but not limited to, notification of the prohibitions and expectations of staff set forth in this policy and the role and responsibility of all District personnel involved in enforcing this policy, including their duty to report alleged violations of this policy and/or conducting an investigation of an alleged violation of this policy; [REMINDER: Documentation of training should be maintained regardless of whether there is an investigation of an alleged violation of this policy. It is best practice to maintain a log of all staff members who participate in a training, along with the date, time and location of the training, and a copy of the materials reviewed and/or presented during the training.]

O. ( ) documentation that any rights or opportunities that the District made available to one party during the investigation were made available to the other party on equal terms;

P. ( ) copies of any notices sent to the alleged perpetrator/responding party of the allegations constituting a potential violation of this policy;

Q. ( ) copies of any notices sent to the complainant and alleged perpetrator in advance of any interview or hearing;

R. ( ) copies of any documentation or evidence used during informal and formal disciplinary meetings and hearings, including the investigation report, and any written responses submitted by the complainant or the alleged perpetrator.

The documents, ESI, and electronic media (as defined in Policy 8315) retained may include public records and records exempt from disclosure under Federal (e.g., FERPA, ADA) and/or State law – e.g., student records and confidential medical records.

The documents, ESI, and electronic media (as defined in Policy 8315) created or received as part of an investigation shall be retained in accordance with Policy 8310, Policy 8315, Policy 8320, and Policy 8330 for not less than three (3) years, but longer if required by the District’s records retention schedule. © Neola 2018

Legal 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX) 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq., The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEIA) 42 U.S.C. 2000c et seq., Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.

42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. 42 U.S.C. 1983 34 C.F.R. Part 106 Dear Colleague Letter on Sexual Violence (Office for Civil Rights, 2011)

OCR’s Revised Sexual Harassment Guidance (2001)

Packet page 38 of 126 Action Item # 21-02-47 Board Meeting: February 23, 2021

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Plymouth, Michigan

M E M O

MEMO TO: Members of the Board of Education Monica Merritt, Superintendent

FROM: Kurt Tyszkiewicz, Executive Director of Student Services

DATE: February 19, 2021

SUBJECT: Policy #7440.01 - Video Surveillance

Date to Administrator for review November, 2020 Reviewed by: Kurt Tyszkiewicz

Date reviewed and approved by the Policy Advisory Committee: January 26, 2021

This policy from NEOLA: reflects current state of the law and should be adopted to have accurate policies X is recommended but not required

is optional

This policy is being brought to the Board of Education for second reading.

KEY IDEA:

This policy is being updated to include the ability to authorize the Superintendent and/or designee to contract with a third-party vendor to broadcast or livestream activities and athletic events.

RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION

It was moved by member ______and seconded by member ______to approve the second reading of Policy 7440.01 for the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools.

Ayes: ______

Nays: ______

The Motion was: ______

Attachments _X__ New/Revised/Replacement Bylaw _ _ Current Policy

Packet page 39 of 126

Book Policy Manual

Section 7000 Property

Title VIDEO SURVEILLANCE 12.4.20

Code po7440.01

Status

Adopted December 11, 2012

Last Revised December 11, 2018

7440.01 - VIDEO SURVEILLANCE

As a means of providing additional security for its students, the District may utilize video surveillance on its buses and school property. The Superintendent is authorized to draft administrative procedures implementing this policy. See Board Policy 1230.01, Development of Administrative Procedures.

To ensure student privacy, access by third parties to data shall be governed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act definition of a "Health or Safety Emergency". FERPA defines a "Health or Safety Emergency" as an articulable and significant threat to the health or safety of students or other individuals. A Health or Safety Emergency must be related to the threat of an actual, impending, or imminent emergency, and not merely the threat of a possible or eventual emergency for which the likelihood of occurrences unknown. A Health or Safety Emergency may include, but shall not be limited to, a natural disaster, terrorist attack, or campus shooting. For purposes of this protocol, a Health or Safety Emergency shall not include routine surveillance, or minor altercations or disturbances.

The Superintendent and/or designee is authorized to negotiate and implement a contract or contracts with (a) third party provider(s) for the provision of broadcasting or recording activities and athletic events, to the extent such broadcasting or recording is consistent with Board policy and relevant law. The Superintendent is directed to develop and implement administrative guidelines in accord with this Policy.

Packet page 40 of 126 Action Item # 21-02-47 Board Meeting: February 23, 2021

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Plymouth, Michigan

M E M O

MEMO TO: Members of the Board of Education Monica Merritt, Superintendent

FROM: Kurt Tyszkiewicz, Executive Director of Student Services

DATE: February 19, 2021

SUBJECT: Policy #8450.05 - Emergency Telecommuting Policy (ETTP)

Date to Administrator for review November, 2020 Reviewed by: Kurt Tyszkiewicz

Date reviewed and approved by the Policy Advisory Committee: January 26, 2021

This policy from NEOLA: reflects current state of the law and should be adopted to have accurate X policies is recommended but not required

is optional

This policy is being brought to the Board of Education for second reading.

KEY IDEA:

This policy is being issued in response to the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration's release of Emergency Rules regarding Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The rule requires that all Michigan employers shall create a policy prohibiting in-person work for employees to the extent that their work activities can feasibly be completed remotely.

RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION

It was moved by member ______and seconded by member ______to approve the second reading of Policy 8450.05 for the Plymouth-Canton Community Schools.

Ayes: ______

Nays: ______

The Motion was: ______

Attachments _X__ New/Revised/Replacement Bylaw _ _ Current Policy

Packet page 41 of 126

Book Policy Manual

Section Disposition Sheets

Title Emergency Temporary Telecommuting Policy (ETTP)

Code po8450.05

Status

On October 14, 2020, the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“MIOSHA”) issued COVID-19 Emergency Rules that require employers to create a policy prohibiting in-person work for employees to the extent that their work activities can feasibly be completed remotely. For the duration of these rules and any extensions thereof, the District shall determine whether it is feasible for employees to work remotely in accordance with this policy. Moreover, the District reserves the right to determine the method of instruction for students, and whether students will learn in-person, in a hybrid model, remotely, or virtually.

A. The District’s essential function is to educate students, which up until the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, has been done with all employees working in-person. Therefore, given the nature of school district operations and its obligation to educate students in an equal and consistent manner, it will not be feasible for many District employees to work remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. All District employees shall continue to report to work in-person, unless the District makes a determination that it is feasible for the employee or employee group to complete their work remotely and the employee or employee group is notified in writing of this determination. B. The positions which shall report in-person include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Teaching Staff, which includes all ancillary staff included in the teacher’s bargaining unit; 2. Administrators; 3. Directors; 4. Supervisors; 5. Paraprofessionals; and 6. Support Staff.

C. The Superintendent or his/her designee shall determine whether an employee or employee group can feasibly complete their work remotely. The Superintendent or his/her designee shall retain the right to change this determination at any time, given the information available to the decision-maker at the time. This determination shall be fact-specific and may consider a variety of factors impacting the quality of the work being performed, including but not limited to:

1. Nature of the work being performed (i.e. whether it must be done in-person); 2. Ability of District to ensure quality control and that students are receiving consistent educational services to which they are entitled; 3. Access to resources, materials, or equipment used to perform the work; 4. Extent to which in-person interaction or collaboration is required or beneficial to the work; 5. Access to timely administrative assistance or technological support; 6. Access to student or other confidential records which the District has a duty to protect from release pursuant to FERPA, or any other federal or state statute, in order to protect student or staff privacy rights; 7. Other benefits of working on-site, rather than in a remote environment; and 8. Other legally permissible criteria identified by the Superintendent or his/her designee.

D. Nothing in this policy shall preclude employees from taking legally permissible leave or requesting reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Packet page 42 of 126 2020 BOND PROGRAM BID PACKAGE EL-1 BOARD of EDUCATION PRESENTATION

February 23, 2021

Packet page 43 of 126 Design, Document and Bid Award Schedule • Board Approves Design & Bid of BP EL-1 – September 15, 2020 • Construction Documents Completed– January 7, 2021 • Documents Available to Bidders – January 13, 2021 • Bids Due - February 4, 2021 • Recommendation to F&O - February 18, 2021

Packet page 44 of 126 Dodson Elementary Addition

Packet page 45 of 126 Dodson Elementary Addition

Packet page 46 of 126 Dodson Elementary Addition

Packet page 47 of 126 Dodson Elementary Addition

Packet page 48 of 126 Eriksson Elementary Addition

Packet page 49 of 126 Field Elementary Addition

Packet page 50 of 126 Hulsing Elementary Addition

Packet page 51 of 126 Eriksson Elementary Addition

Packet page 52 of 126 Field Elementary Addition

Packet page 53 of 126 Hulsing Elementary Addition

Packet page 54 of 126 Eriksson Elementary Addition

Packet page 55 of 126 Field Elementary Addition

Packet page 56 of 126 Hulsing Elementary Addition

Packet page 57 of 126 BP EL-1 Bid Summary

Packet page 58 of 126 BP EL-1 Bid Summary

Packet page 59 of 126 BP EL-1 Bid Summary

Packet page 60 of 126 THANK YOU!

Packet page 61 of 126 PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Office of Chief Finance & Operations Officer

TO: Monica Merritt, Superintendent Board of Education Finance & Operations Committee

FROM: Deborah J. Piesz, Chief Finance & Operations Officer

DATE: February 23, 2021

RE: Contract Awards for Bid Package #EL-1, summer 2021 work at Dodson, Eriksson, Field, and Hulsing- Final Reading ______OVERVIEW:

The first bid package of the 2020 Bond, BP #EL-1, is comprised of the elementary school expansion projects at Dodson, Eriksson, Field and Hulsing Elementary Schools. This is the summer 2021 construction work. On September 15, 2020 the Board of Education approved that the bond team move forward with the design and bid phase of these projects. On February 4, 2021 and February 11, 2021, bids were publicly opened and tabulated. Fortunately we were able to realize a 13%+ savings over budget on this bid package.

At this time we are bringing forward this resolution to award 76 contracts totaling $17,675,007.62.

This item was presented at the Finance & Operations Committee meeting of February 18, 2021.

RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION:

It was moved by Member ______and seconded by Member ______to approve the award of contracts on BP #EL-1. This bid package will cost $ 17,675,007.62 to be funded with 2020 bond funds.

Ayes: ______Nays: ______The motion was: ______

Packet page 62 of 126

February 15, 2021

Ms. Deborah Piesz Chief Finance and Operations Officer Plymouth Canton Community Schools 454 S. Harvey Plymouth, MI 48170

RE: Plymouth Canton Community Schools – 2020 Bond Issue Bid Package #EL-1 – Elementary Additions & Renovations

SUBJ: Contract Award Recommendation

Dear Ms. Piesz,

On Thursday, February 4, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. sealed bids were received and publicly opened for the above referenced project. In attendance for the bid opening were representatives from Plymouth Canton Community Schools, TMP Architecture, McCarthy & Smith, Inc. and interested bidders. At time of bid, the electrical scope of work was extended to February 11, 2021 at 1:00. Bids were opened, recorded and tabulated

The project team conducted post bid interviews with the following low, qualified bidders for the individual scopes of work. During post bid interviews, the project team reviewed the scope of work, project schedule, manpower requirements, and specified materials with the bidders. In some instances, second or third low bidders are being recommended if the low contractors were missing scope, or not able to fulfill the manpower requirements.

Additionally, the project team will be approaching the Board of Education to expedite Letters of Intent for scopes of work that are subject to price increases (BD107: Metals) and material availability (BD 128: Casework) to help ensure materials are available for install in accordance with the Milestone Schedule.

Based upon the project team’s review of the proposals and specified scopes of work, we recommend the following firms to Plymouth Canton Community Schools for contract award:

Bid Division 101: Earthwork/Site Utilities (Eriksson) Mr. Phil Nichols Best Asphalt 6334 N. Beverly Plaza Romulus, MI 48174 Base Bid $ 334,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co) $ 2,000.00

TOTAL $ 336,000.00

24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335 ▪ Phone 248-427-8400 ▪ Fax 248-427-8401 ▪ [email protected] Packet page 63 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 2

Bid Division 101: Earthwork/Site Utilities (Field) Mr. Phil Nichols Best Asphalt 6334 N. Beverly Plaza Romulus, MI 48174 Base Bid $ 359,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co) $ 2,266.00

TOTAL $ 361,266.00

Bid Division 101: Earthwork/Site Utilities (Hulsing) Mr. Phil Nichols Best Asphalt 6334 N. Beverly Plaza Romulus, MI 48174 Base Bid $ 311,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co) $ 1,960.00

TOTAL $ 312,960.00

Bid Division 101: Earthwork/Site Utilities (Dodson) Mr. Phil Nichols Best Asphalt 6334 N. Beverly Plaza Romulus, MI 48174 Base Bid $ 188,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield National Insurance Co) $ 1,200.00

TOTAL $ 189,200.00

Bid Division 102: Asphalt/Site Concrete (Eriksson) Mr. Jeffrey Gossett S&J Asphalt Paving Co. 39571 Michigan Avenue Canton, MI 48188 Base Bid $ 305,600.00 PLM Bond (Hudson Insurance Co) $ 4,000.00

TOTAL $ 309,600.00

Bid Division 102: Asphalt/Site Concrete (Field) Mr. Phil Nichols Best Asphalt 6334 N. Beverly Plaza Romulus, MI 48174 Base Bid $ 275,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co) $ 1,700.00 Combined Bid Deduct $ -20,000.00

TOTAL $ 256,700.00 ***This bidder becomes low due to a Combined Bid Deduct of -$20,000.00 awarded as part of BD 101

Packet page 64 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 3

Bid Division 102: Asphalt/Site Concrete (Hulsing) Mr. Jeffrey Gossett S&J Asphalt Paving Co. 39571 Michigan Avenue Canton, MI 48188 Base Bid $ 278,000.00 PLM Bond (Hudson Insurance Co) $ 3,900.00

TOTAL $ 281,900.00

Bid Division 102: Asphalt/Site Concrete (Dodson) Mr. Jeffrey Gossett S&J Asphalt Paving Co. 39571 Michigan Avenue Canton, MI 48188 Base Bid $ 345,000.00 PLM Bond (Hudson Insurance Co) $ 4,700.00

TOTAL $ 349,700.00

Bid Division 103: Selective Demolition (Eriksson) Mr. Fred Yacoub DKI, International Inc. 6775 Daly Rd, 101 West Bloomfield Township, MI 48322 Base Bid $ 49,000.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 00.00

TOTAL $ 49,000.00

Bid Division 103: Selective Demolition (Field) Mr. Fred Yacoub DKI, International Inc. 6775 Daly Rd, 101 West Bloomfield Township, MI 48322 Base Bid $ 49,000.00 PLM Bond (Employers Mutual Casualty Co.) $ 900.00 Alternate #3A- Field Casework Removal $ 3,500.00

TOTAL $ 53,400.00

Bid Division 103: Selective Demolition (Hulsing) Mr. Fred Yacoub DKI, International Inc. 6775 Daly Rd, 101 West Bloomfield Township, MI 48322 Base Bid $ 49,900.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 00.00

TOTAL $ 49,900.00

Packet page 65 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 4

Bid Division 103: Selective Demolition (Dodson) Mr. Toma Stanaj DTS Contracting, LLC 21365 Goldsmith St. Farmington Hills, MI 48335 Base Bid $ 38,740.00 PLM Bond (Old Republic Insurance) $ 960.00 Alternate #1A- Dodson Carpeting $ 18,920.00 Alternate #1B- Dodson Carpeting $ 5,480.00

TOTAL $ 64,100.00

Bid Division 104: Concrete Footings & Foundations (Eriksson) Mr. David Glowski North Channel Construction 6137 Lakeshore Rd. Lexington, MI 48450 Base Bid $ 87,820.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 1,590.00

TOTAL $ 89,410.00

Bid Division 104: Concrete Footings & Foundations (Field) Mr. David Glowski North Channel Construction 6137 Lakeshore Rd. Lexington, MI 48450 Base Bid $ 92,920.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 1,682.00

TOTAL $ 94,602.00

Bid Division 104: Concrete Footings & Foundations (Hulsing) Mr. David Glowski North Channel Construction 6137 Lakeshore Rd. Lexington, MI 48450 Base Bid $ 87,920.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 1,590.00

TOTAL $ 89,510.00

Bid Division 104: Concrete Footings & Foundations (Dodson) Mr. Matthew Cosby Midtown Group, LLC 5650 West Jefferson Ave. Detroit, MI 48209 Base Bid $ 51,770.00 PLM Bond (Selective Insurance Co. of America) $ 770.00

TOTAL $ 52,540.00

Packet page 66 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 5

Bid Division 105: Concrete Flatwork (Eriksson) Mr. Matthew Cosby Midtown Group, LLC 5650 West Jefferson Ave. Detroit, MI 48209 Base Bid $ 88,635.00 PLM Bond (Selective Insurance Co. of America) $ 1,330.00

TOTAL $ 89,965.00

Bid Division 105: Concrete Flatwork (Field) Mr. Matthew Cosby Midtown Group, LLC 5650 West Jefferson Ave. Detroit, MI 48209 Base Bid $ 88,635.00 PLM Bond (Selective Insurance Co. of America) $ 1,330.00

TOTAL $ 89,965.00

Bid Division 105: Concrete Flatwork (Hulsing) Mr. Matthew Cosby Midtown Group, LLC 5650 West Jefferson Ave. Detroit, MI 48209 Base Bid $ 88,635.00 PLM Bond (Selective Insurance Co. of America) $ 1,330.00

TOTAL $ 89,965.00

Bid Division 105: Concrete Flatwork (Dodson) Mr. Matthew Cosby Midtown Group, LLC 5650 West Jefferson Ave. Detroit, MI 48209 Base Bid $ 47,140.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 00.00

TOTAL $ 47,140.00

Bid Division 106: Masonry (Eriksson) Mr. Steve Meyer Schiffer Mason Contractors 2190 Delhi St. NE Holt, MI 48842 Base Bid $ 542,000.00 PLM Bond (Fidelity & Deposit Co.) $ 5,168.00

TOTAL $ 547,168.00

Packet page 67 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 6

Bid Division 106: Masonry (Field) Mr. Steve Meyer Schiffer Mason Contractors 2190 Delhi St. NE Holt, MI 48842 Base Bid $ 541,000.00 PLM Bond (Fidelity & Deposit Co.) $ 5,160.00

TOTAL $ 546,160.00

Bid Division 106: Masonry (Hulsing) Ms. Soozie Baker Baker Construction Co. 7936 Highway 36 Whitmore Lake, MI 48189 Base Bid $ 543,365.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co.) $ 4,775.00

TOTAL $ 548,140.00

Bid Division 106: Masonry (Dodson) Mr. John Connolly Connolly Masonry 9706 Andersonville Rd. Clarkston, MI 48346 Base Bid $ 330,600.00 PLM Bond (VTC Insurance Group) $ 4,750.00

TOTAL $ 335,350.00

Bid Division 107: Metals (Eriksson) Mr. Ron Pawlak Judd Industrial Contracting, Inc. 17900 Ryan Rd. Detroit, MI 48212 Base Bid $ 189,500.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 2,842.00 Combined Bid Deduct $ -1,750.00

TOTAL $ 190,592.00 ***This bidder offered a Combined Bid Deduct of -$7,000.00 Total if awarded all of BD 107

Bid Division 107: Metals (Field) Mr. Ron Pawlak Judd Industrial Contracting, Inc. 17900 Ryan Rd. Detroit, MI 48212 Base Bid $ 189,500.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 2,842.00 Combined Bid Deduct $ -1,750.00

TOTAL $ 190,592.00 ***This bidder offered a Combined Bid Deduct of -$7,000.00 Total if awarded all of BD 107

Packet page 68 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 7

Bid Division 107: Metals (Hulsing) Mr. Ron Pawlak Judd Industrial Contracting, Inc. 17900 Ryan Rd. Detroit, MI 48212 Base Bid $ 192,500.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 2,887.00 Combined Bid Deduct $ -1,750.00

TOTAL $ 193,637.00 ***This bidder offered a Combined Bid Deduct of -$7,000.00 Total if awarded all of BD 107

Bid Division 107: Metals (Dodson) Mr. Ron Pawlak Judd Industrial Contracting, Inc. 17900 Ryan Rd. Detroit, MI 48212 Base Bid $ 75,900.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 1,138.00 Combined Bid Deduct $ -1,750.00

TOTAL $ 75,288.00 ***This bidder offered a Combined Bid Deduct of -$7,000.00 Total if awarded all of BD 107

Bid Division 108: Carpentry / General Trades (Eriksson) Mr. Jeremy Eschner Wally Kosorski & Company, Inc. 33500 Kelly Rd. Clinton Twp, MI 48035 Base Bid $ 162,750.00 PLM Bond (Ohio Casualty) $ 2,720.00

TOTAL $ 165,470.00

Bid Division 108: Carpentry / General Trades (Field) Mr. Jeremy Eschner Wally Kosorski & Company, Inc. 33500 Kelly Rd. Clinton Twp., MI 48035 Base Bid $ 160,554.00 PLM Bond (Ohio Casualty) $ 2,690.00

TOTAL $ 163,244.00

Bid Division 108: Carpentry / General Trades (Hulsing) Mr. Jeremy Eschner Wally Kosorski & Company, Inc. 33500 Kelly Rd. Clinton Twp., MI 48035 Base Bid $ 161,760.00 PLM Bond (Ohio Casualty) $ 2,707.00

TOTAL $ 164,467.00

Packet page 69 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 8

Bid Division 108: Carpentry / General Trades (Dodson) Mr. Aaron White The Spieker Company 2541 Tracy Road Northwood, OH 43619 Base Bid $ 76,700.00 PLM Bond (USI Insurance Services) $ 650.00

TOTAL $ 77,350.00

Bid Division 109: Roofing (Eriksson) Mr. Sean Kilgore Lutz Roofing Company, Inc. 4721 22 Mile Rd, Shelby Charter Township, MI 48317 Base Bid $ 755,110.00 PLM Bond (Western Surety) $ 7,500.00

TOTAL $ 762,610.00 *** Third Low Bidder. Original low bidders had errors in their bid.

Bid Division 109: Roofing (Field) Mr. Sean Kilgore Lutz Roofing Company, Inc. 4721 22 Mile Rd, Shelby Charter Township, MI 48317 Base Bid $ 762,450.00 PLM Bond (Western Surety) $ 7,500.00

TOTAL $ 769,950.00 *** Third Low Bidder. Original low bidders had errors in their bid.

Bid Division 109: Roofing (Hulsing) Mr. Sean Kilgore Lutz Roofing Company, Inc. 4721 22 Mile Rd, Shelby Charter Township, MI 48317 Base Bid $ 773,120.00 PLM Bond (Western Surety) $ 7,500.00

TOTAL $ 780,620.00 *** Third Low Bidder. Original low bidders had errors in their bid.

Bid Division 109: Roofing (Dodson) Mr. Don Ciampichini Newton Crane Roofing Inc. 353 N Cass Ave Pontiac, MI 48342 Base Bid $ 408,000.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 6,000.00

TOTAL $ 414,000.00

Packet page 70 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 9

Bid Division 112: Caulking Mr. Chris Passeri Industrial Solutions 6175 Jackson Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Base Bid $ 63,386.00 PLM Bond (Nationwide Mutual) $ 1,800.00

TOTAL $ 65,186.00

Bid Division 114: Glass/Glazing (Eriksson) Mr. Ken VanBuskirk Daniels Glass Inc. 21250 W. Seven Mile Rd. Detroit, MI 48219

Base Bid $ 196,058.00 PLM Bond (VCT Insurance) $ 2,940.00

TOTAL $ 198,998.00

Bid Division 114: Glass/Glazing (Field) Mr. Ken VanBuskirk Daniels Glass Inc. 21250 W. Seven Mile Rd. Detroit, MI 48219

Base Bid $ 179,098.00 PLM Bond (VCT Insurance) $ 2,680.00

TOTAL $ 181,778.00

Bid Division 114: Glass/Glazing (Hulsing) Mr. Ken VanBuskirk Daniels Glass Inc. 21250 W. Seven Mile Rd. Detroit, MI 48219 Base Bid $ 213,218.00 PLM Bond (VCT Insurance) $ 3,200.00

TOTAL $ 216,418.00

Bid Division 114: Glass/Glazing (Dodson) Mr. Howard Beindit Preferred Glass 6215 King Rd Marine City, MI 48039 Base Bid $ 68,000.00 PLM Bond (Hudson Insurance Co.) $ 980.00

TOTAL $ 68,980.00

Packet page 71 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 10

Bid Division 115: Metal Studs/Drywall Mr. Matt Kulie ANM Construction Co. Inc. 55331 Lyon Industrial Drive Lyon Charter Twp., MI 48165 Base Bid $ 553,200.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Company) $ 5,050.00

TOTAL $ 558,250.00

Bid Division 116: Hard Tile Mr. William Elzay DF Floor Covering 5242 Exchange Dr., Suite 2 Flint, MI 48507 Base Bid $ 72,908.00 PLM Bond (West Bend) $ 1,823.00

TOTAL $ 74,731.00

Bid Division 117: Acoustical Ceilings (Eriksson) Mr. Rich Wagner Clark Contracting Services 2660 Superior Ct. Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Base Bid $ 94,750.00 PLM Bond (Federal Insurance Company) $ 950.00

TOTAL $ 95,700.00

Bid Division 117: Acoustical Ceilings (Field) Mr. Rich Wagner Clark Contracting Services 2660 Superior Ct. Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Base Bid $ 94,750.00 PLM Bond (Federal Insurance Company) $ 950.00

TOTAL $ 95,700.00

Bid Division 117: Acoustical Ceilings (Hulsing) Mr. Rich Wagner Clark Contracting Services 2660 Superior Ct. Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Base Bid $ 95,150.00 PLM Bond (Federal Insurance Company) $ 950.00

TOTAL $ 96,100.00

Packet page 72 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 11

Bid Division 117: Acoustical Ceilings (Dodson) Mr. Rich Wagner Clark Contracting Services 2660 Superior Ct. Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Base Bid $ 92,850.00 PLM Bond (Federal Insurance Company) $ 950.00

TOTAL $ 93,800.00

Bid Division 118: Carpet / Resilient Tile (Eriksson) Mr. Lucas Beiswanger Cohns Commercial Floor Covering, Inc. 47641 Avante Dr. Wixom, MI 48393 Base Bid $ 55,885.00 PLM Bond (North American Specialty) $ 600.00

TOTAL $ 56,485.00

Bid Division 118: Carpet / Resilient Tile (Field) Mr. Lucas Beiswanger Cohns Commercial Floor Covering, Inc. 47641 Avante Dr. Wixom, MI 48393 Base Bid $ 55,885.00 PLM Bond (North American Specialty) $ 600.00 Alternate #3A- Field Carpeting $ 2,975.00

TOTAL $ 59,460.00

Bid Division 118: Carpet / Resilient Tile (Hulsing) Mr. Lucas Beiswanger Cohns Commercial Floor Covering, Inc. 47641 Avante Dr. Wixom, MI 48393 Base Bid $ 79,995.00 PLM Bond (North American Specialty) $ 800.00

TOTAL $ 80,795.00

Bid Division 118: Carpet / Resilient Tile (Dodson) Mr. Lucas Beiswanger Cohns Commercial Floor Covering, Inc. 47641 Avante Dr. Wixom, MI 48393 Base Bid $ 45,998.00 PLM Bond (North American Specialty) $ 500.00 Alternate #1A- Added Dodson Carpeting $ 55,581.00 Alternate #1B- Added Dodson Carpeting $ 19,988.00

TOTAL $ 122,067.00

Packet page 73 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 12

Bid Division 119: Terrazzo Flooring Mr. John Michielutti Michielutti Brothers, Inc. 15033 East 9 Mile Rd. Eastpointe, MI 48021 Base Bid $ 47,600.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 00.00

TOTAL $ 47,600.00

Bid Division 120: Painting (Eriksson) Mr. Aldo Foto R&G Painting Home Improvement LLC 28221 Beck Rd. Ste A15 Wixom, MI 48393 Base Bid $ 39,900.00 PLM Bond (Western Surety Company) $ 0.00 Alternate #2A- Eriksson Ceiling Grid Painting $ 23,500.00

TOTAL $ 63,400.00

Bid Division 120: Painting (Field) Mr. Aldo Foto R&G Painting Home Improvement LLC 28221 Beck Rd. Ste A15 Wixom, MI 48393 Base Bid $ 42,550.00 PLM Bond (Western Surety Company) $ 0.00 Alternate #2B- Field Ceiling Grid Painting $ 23,500.00

TOTAL $ 66,050.00

Bid Division 120: Painting (Hulsing) Mr. Govani Lulgjuraj Papa’s Painting 3805 Clyde Rd Holly MI 48442 Base Bid $ 44,650.00 PLM Bond (Western Bend Mutual) $ 1,120.00 Alternate #2C- Hulsing Ceiling Grid Painting $ 9,670.00 Voluntary Alternate- Additional Labor Material for Schedule $ 6,550.00 Change

TOTAL $ 61,990.00

Bid Division 120: Painting (Dodson) Mr. Govani Lulgjuraj Papa’s Painting 3805 Clyde Rd Holly MI 48442 Base Bid $ 11,880.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 0.00

TOTAL $ 11,880.00

Packet page 74 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 13

Bid Division 124: Wood Flooring Mr. Peter Agnello Varsity Sports Flooring 13022 Avalon Dr. Shelby Charter Twp., MI 48315 Base Bid $ 142,000.00 PLM Bond (Western Surety Co.) $ 2,840.00

TOTAL $ 144,840.00

Bid Division 125: Toilet Compartments Mr. Matthew Fix R.E. Leggette Co. 9335 Saint Stephens Street Dearborn, MI 48126 Base Bid $ 83,730.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Company) $ 680.00

TOTAL $ 84,410.00

Bid Division 128: Casework Mr. Terry Edewaard Architectural Systems Group LLC 92 Veterans Drive Holland, MI 49423 Base Bid $ 128,500.00 PLM Bond (Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.) $ 700.00

TOTAL $ 129,200.00

Bid Division 130: Window Treatments Mr. Richard Secord Triangle Window Fashions, Inc. 2625 Buchanan Ave. SW Grand Rapids, MI 49548 Base Bid $ 28,167.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 00.00

TOTAL $ 28,167.00

Bid Division 131: Athletic Equipment Mr. Ben Hurst C&M Associates, Inc. 3637 South Old US Highway 23 Brighton, MI 48114 Base Bid $ 43,260.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 00.00

TOTAL $ 43,260.00

Packet page 75 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 14

Bid Division 137: Food Service Equipment Mr. David M. Stafford Stafford-Smith, Inc. 3414 S. Burdick Street Kalamazoo, MI 49001 Base Bid $ 140,406.62 PLM Bond (Western Surety Co.) $ 842.00

TOTAL $ 141,248.62

Bid Division 140: Plumbing (Eriksson) Mr. Paul Bowers Contrast Mechanical, Inc. 15825 Leone Dr. Macomb, MI 48042 Base Bid $ 185,000.00 PLM Bond (Travelers Insurance) $ 1,800.00

TOTAL $ 186,800.00

Bid Division 140: Plumbing (Field) Mr. Paul Bowers Contrast Mechanical, Inc. 15825 Leone Dr. Macomb, MI 48042 Base Bid $ 185,000.00 PLM Bond (Travelers Insurance) $ 1,800.00

TOTAL $ 186,800.00

Bid Division 140: Plumbing (Hulsing) Mr. Paul Bowers Contrast Mechanical, Inc. 15825 Leone Dr. Macomb, MI 48042 Base Bid $ 185,000.00 PLM Bond (Travelers Insurance) $ 1,800.00

TOTAL $ 186,800.00

Bid Division 140: Plumbing (Dodson) Mr. Jim Jagodzinksi Tempco Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 24383 Indoplex Circle Farmington Hills, MI 48335 Base Bid $ 182,500.00 PLM Bond (Merchants Bonding Co.) $ 3,500.00

TOTAL $ 186,000.00

Packet page 76 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 15

Bid Division 141: Fire Protection Mr. Bill Jaques Absolute Fire Protection, Inc. 235 Church Street Mount Clemens, MI 48043 Base Bid $ 47,907.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 00.00

TOTAL $ 47,907.00

Bid Division 142: HVAC (Eriksson) Mr. Dan Gee Gee & Missler 744 Vinewood St Wyandotte, MI 48192 Base Bid $ 358,700.00 PLM Bond (Harco National Insurance Company) $ 4,400.00

TOTAL $ 363,100.00

Bid Division 142: HVAC (Field) Mr. Chris Marinkovich Quality Aire Systems 326 6 Mile Rd Whitmore Lake, MI 48189 Base Bid $ 359,000.00 PLM Bond (Cincinnati Insurance Co) $ 2,650.00 Voluntary Alternate- RTU Screenwall $ 43,000.00

TOTAL $ 404,650.00

Bid Division 142: HVAC (Hulsing) Mr. Dan Gee Gee & Missler 744 Vinewood St Wyandotte, MI 48192 Base Bid $ 361,700.00 PLM Bond (Harco National Insurance Company) $ 4,400.00

TOTAL $ 366,100.00

Bid Division 142: HVAC (Dodson) Mr. Chris Marinkovich Quality Aire Systems 326 6 Mile Rd Whitmore Lake, MI 48189 Base Bid $ 390,000.00 PLM Bond (Cincinnati Insurance Co) $ 2,925.00

TOTAL $ 392,925.00

Packet page 77 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 16

Bid Division 143: Electrical (Eriksson) Mr. Charles R. Schwab Great Lakes Power & Lighting, Inc. 9646 Marine City Hwy. Casco, MI 48064 Base Bid $ 835,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co.) $ 10,000.00 Alternate #4A- Eriksson Fire Alarm $ 72,000.00

TOTAL $ 917,000.00

Bid Division 143: Electrical (Field) Mr. Charles R. Schwab Great Lakes Power & Lighting, Inc. 9646 Marine City Hwy. Casco, MI 48064 Base Bid $ 786,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co.) $ 10,000.00 Alternate #3A- Field Electrical Removal $ 1,000.00 Alternate #4B – Field Fire Alarm $ 72,000.00

TOTAL $ 869,000.00

Bid Division 143: Electrical (Hulsing) Mr. Charles R. Schwab Great Lakes Power & Lighting, Inc. 9646 Marine City Hwy. Casco, MI 48064 Base Bid $ 786,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co.) $ 10,000.00 Alternate #4C- Hulsing Fire Alarm $ 72,000.00

TOTAL $ 868,000.00

Bid Division 143: Electrical (Eriksson) Mr. Charles R. Schwab Great Lakes Power & Lighting, Inc. 9646 Marine City Hwy. Casco, MI 48064 Base Bid $ 589,000.00 PLM Bond (Westfield Insurance Co.) $ 8,000.00

TOTAL $ 597,000.00

Bid Division 149: Fencing Mr. Franco Amicucci Nationwide Construction Group 53861 Gratiot Avenue New Baltimore, MI 48051 Base Bid $ 34,971.00 PLM Bond (Not Required) $ 00.00

TOTAL $ 34,971.00

TOTAL AWARD RECOMMENDATION AMOUNT: $ 17,675,007.62

Packet page 78 of 126

Plymouth Canton Community Schools Bid Package #EL-1 Page 17

I have included a copy of the bid summary spreadsheet and the bid tabulation for your review. Additionally we have assembled a condensed summary of the Contract Award Recommendation information and attached it to this Award Recommendation as Exhibit A.

I trust the above award recommendation will meet with your approval and the approval of the Board of Education. I will be in attendance at the Board of Education meetings on February 23, 2021 and March 09, 2021 to answer any questions that may arise.

Should you have any concerns prior to the board meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Brian Gesaman Brian Gesaman McCarthy & Smith, Inc.

CC: Mr. Derek Dinkeloo, TMP Architecture Mr. Bill McCarthy, McCarthy & Smith, Inc. Mr. Kevin Ingle, McCarthy & Smith File

Packet page 79 of 126 PCCS 2020 Bond Finance and Operations Meeting February 18, 2021

1. Bid Package EL-1- Additions and Renovations at Eriksson, Field, Hulsing and Dodson

Elementary

a. Refresh of scope of work at Eriksson, Field, Hulsing, and Dodson

b. Project is Under Budget!

c. Bids Received on February 4th and February 11th (Electrical Only)

i. Received 393 bids across 28 different scopes of work.

ii. The majority of the scopes of work were broken out by building to help ensure

contractors had the staffing compacity to complete the work in the allotted

timeframe.

iii. Some contractors did not bid all (4) schools

d. Bidder Coverage

i. In general, we received good coverage on nearly all scopes of work.

ii. Bid Divisions of note

1. BD 115: Metal Studs/Drywall Received (2) Bids. This is a rather large

scope of work that includes the metal composite wall panels for Eriksson,

Field, and Hulsing main entrances. This scope of work does limit the type

of contractors that can bid on this type of work.

2. BD 119: Terrazzo Flooring Received (1) Bid. Only 4 contractors in the

state of Michigan perform this type of work. (2) locally perform this work

and (1) of the (2) was unable to bid the job based on workload.

3. BD 125: Toilet Compartments Received (1) Bid. 9 bidders were invited,

only (1) could commit the manpower to complete the work this summer.

4. BD 128: Casework Received (2) Bids. Many contractors not available

during the summer months when much of this work is scheduled.

5. BD 130: Window Treatments received (2) bids. Relatively small scope of

work, but summer construction prohibited some contractors from bidding.

Packet page 80 of 126 PCCS 2020 Bond Finance and Operations Meeting February 18, 2021 e. Post- Bid Interviews

i. Post-Bid interviews were conducted to verify scope, manpower availability, and

commitment to schedule.

ii. In some cases, contractors had errors in their bid that would prevent them from

doing the work and in turn prevent the project team from recommending them.

Those contractors are identified on the Award Recommendation Letter for

clarification (Reference BD109 Roofing).

iii. In other cases, contractors included a combined bid deduct within their

proposal if they were to be awarded multiple projects. These contractors are

also identified on the Award Recommendation Letter (Reference BD102

Asphalt Paving and BD 107: Metals)

f. Alternates

i. Alternate 1a Dodson Carpeting- Replace existing (dated) carpeting that was

not previously removed in past bid packs.

ii. Alternate 1B Dodson Carpeting- Replace existing (dated) carpeting that was

not previously removed in past bid packs.

iii. Alternate 2A Eriksson Ceiling Grid Painting- Paint ceiling grid where ceiling

tiles are scheduled for replacement and grid to remain.

iv. Alternate 2B Field Ceiling Painting- Paint ceiling grid where ceiling tiles are

scheduled for replacement and grid to remain.

v. Alternate 2C- Hulsing Ceiling Grid Painting- Paint ceiling grid where ceiling tiles

are scheduled for replacement and grid to remain.

vi. Alternate 2D Eriksson Ceiling Grid Replacement- Removal/Replacement of

ceiling grid where ceiling tiles are scheduled for replacement and grid to

remain.

vii. Alternate 2E Field Ceiling Grid Replacement- Removal/Replacement of ceiling

grid where ceiling tiles are scheduled for replacement and grid to remain.

Packet page 81 of 126 PCCS 2020 Bond Finance and Operations Meeting February 18, 2021 viii. Alternate 2F Hulsing Ceiling Grid Replacement- Removal/Replacement of

ceiling grid where ceiling tiles are scheduled for replacement and grid to

remain.

ix. Alternate 3A Field Casework Removal- Remove existing casework in Media

Center for former Home Economics program.

x. Alternate 4A Eriksson Fire Alarm Replacement- Removal/Replacement of

aging Fire Alarm System in existing building.

xi. Alternate 4B Field Fire Alarm Replacement- Removal/Replacement of aging

Fire Alarm System in existing building.

xii. Alternate 4C Hulsing Fire Alarm Replacement- Removal/Replacement of aging

Fire Alarm System in existing building.

g. Budget

i. Project came in under budget!

ii. The proposed variance is based off of Construction budget vs. actual

construction.

iii. With the development of the Technology Drawings, some of this variance will

be used for Technology at Eriksson, Field, and Hulsing.

h. Schedule

i. Work at all (4) buildings is scheduled to break ground in spring.

ii. Dodson to occupy new addition late fall 2021

iii. Eriksson, Field, and Hulsing to occupy new addition early Winter 2021

i. Questions?

Packet page 82 of 126 McCarthy Smith, Inc. Project: PCCS BP #EL-1 - Elementary Additions Renovation Owner: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools Date: 2/15/2021

Bid Summary Base Bid Information Bid Range

Bid Combined Accepted Voluntary Total Contract Award # of Bids Division Description Apparent Low Bidder Base Bid PLM Bond Bid Deduct Total Base Bid Alternates Alternates Amount Received High Low 101-E Earthwork/Site Utilities Best Asphalt $334,000.00 $2,000.00 $336,000.00 $336,000.00 4 $414,500.00 $336,000.00 101-F Earthwork/Site Utilities Best Asphalt $359,000.00 $2,266.00 $361,266.00 $361,266.00 4 $417,000.00 $361,266.00 101-H Earthwork/Site Utilities Best Asphalt $311,000.00 $1,960.00 $312,960.00 $312,960.00 4 $376,000.00 $312,960.00 101-D Earthwork/Site Utilities Best Asphalt $188,000.00 $1,200.00 $189,200.00 $189,200.00 4 $243,400.00 $189,200.00 102-E Asphalt Paving S&J Asphalt Paving $305,600.00 $4,000.00 $309,600.00 $309,600.00 5 $332,400.00 $309,600.00 102-F Asphalt Paving Best Asphalt $275,000.00 $1,700.00 -$20,000.00 $256,700.00 $256,700.00 5 $289,100.00 $265,240.00 102-H Asphalt Paving S&J Asphalt Paving $278,000.00 $3,900.00 $281,900.00 $281,900.00 5 $318,393.00 $281,900.00 102-D Asphalt Paving S&J Asphalt Paving $345,000.00 $4,700.00 $349,700.00 $349,700.00 5 $391,900.00 $349,700.00 103-E Selective Demolition DKI $49,000.00 $0.00 $49,000.00 $49,000.00 7 $131,600.00 $49,900.00 103-F Selective Demolition DKI $49,000.00 $900.00 $49,900.00 $3,500.00 $53,400.00 7 $139,700.00 $49,900.00 103-H Selective Demolition DKI $49,900.00 $0.00 $49,900.00 $49,900.00 7 $137,200.00 $50,800.00 103-D Selective Demolition DTS $38,740.00 $960.00 $39,700.00 $24,400.00 $64,100.00 7 $190,900.00 $39,700.00 104-E Footings & Foundations North Channel Construction $87,820.00 $1,590.00 $89,410.00 $89,410.00 5 $150,815.00 $89,410.00 104-F Footings & Foundations North Channel Construction $92,920.00 $1,682.00 $94,602.00 $94,602.00 5 $150,815.00 $94,602.00 104-H Footings & Foundations North Channel Construction $87,920.00 $1,590.00 $89,510.00 $89,510.00 5 $150,815.00 $89,510.00 104-D Footings & Foundations Midtown $51,770.00 $770.00 $52,540.00 $52,540.00 5 $88,491.00 $52,540.00 105-E Concrete Flatwork Midtown $88,635.00 $1,330.00 $89,965.00 $89,965.00 5 $104,025.00 $89,965.00 105-F Concrete Flatwork Midtown $88,635.00 $1,330.00 $89,965.00 $89,965.00 5 $104,025.00 $89,965.00 105-H Concrete Flatwork Midtown $88,635.00 $1,330.00 $89,965.00 $89,965.00 5 $104,025.00 $89,965.00 105-D Concrete Flatwork Midtown $47,140.00 $0.00 $47,140.00 $47,140.00 5 $57,800.00 $47,897.00 106-E Masonry Schiffer Mason Contractors $542,000.00 $5,168.00 $547,168.00 $547,168.00 7 $764,900.00 $547,168.00 106-F Masonry Schiffer Mason Contractors $541,000.00 $5,160.00 $546,160.00 $546,160.00 6 $584,400.00 $546,160.00 106-H Masonry Baker Construction Co. $543,365.00 $4,775.00 $548,140.00 $548,140.00 6 $595,500.00 $548,140.00 106-D Masonry Connolly Masonry $330,600.00 $4,750.00 $335,350.00 $335,350.00 7 $481,820.00 $335,350.00 107-E Metals Judd Industrial Contracting $189,500.00 $2,842.00 -$1,750.00 $190,592.00 $190,592.00 6 $288,948.00 $192,342.00 107-F Metals Judd Industrial Contracting $189,500.00 $2,842.00 -$1,750.00 $190,592.00 $190,592.00 6 $288,948.00 $192,342.00 107-H Metals Judd Industrial Contracting $192,500.00 $2,887.00 -$1,750.00 $193,637.00 $193,637.00 6 $288,948.00 $195,387.00 107-D Metals Judd Industrial Contracting $75,900.00 $1,138.00 -$1,750.00 $75,288.00 $75,288.00 6 $136,754.00 $77,038.00 108-E Carpentry/General Trades Wally Kosorski $162,750.00 $2,720.00 $165,470.00 $165,470.00 4 $232,400.00 $165,470.00 108-F Carpentry/General Trades Wally Kosorski $160,554.00 $2,690.00 $163,244.00 $163,244.00 4 $229,100.00 $163,244.00 108-H Carpentry/General Trades Wally Kosorski $161,760.00 $2,707.00 $164,467.00 $164,467.00 4 $231,800.00 $164,467.00 108-D Carpentry/General Trades The Spieker Company $76,700.00 $650.00 $77,350.00 $77,350.00 4 $108,900.00 $77,350.00 109-E Roofing Lutz $755,110.00 $7,500.00 $762,610.00 $762,610.00 5 $1,168,006.00 $570,235.00 109-F Roofing Lutz $762,450.00 $7,500.00 $769,950.00 $769,950.00 5 $1,168,006.00 $570,235.00 109-H Roofing Lutz $773,120.00 $7,500.00 $780,620.00 $780,620.00 5 $1,168,006.00 $570,235.00 109-D Roofing Newton & Crane $408,000.00 $6,000.00 $414,000.00 $414,000.00 5 $618,356.00 $212,065.00

Packet page 83 of 126 McCarthy Smith, Inc. Project: PCCS BP #EL-1 - Elementary Additions Renovation Owner: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools Bid SummaryDate: 2/15/2021 Base Bid Information Bid Combined Accepted Voluntary Total Contract Award # of Bids Bid Range Division Description Apparent Low Bidder Base Bid PLM Bond Bid Deduct Total Base Bid Alternates Alternates Amount Received High Low 112 Caulking Industrial Solutions $63,386.00 $1,800.00 $65,186.00 $65,186.00 4 $90,288.00 $65,186.00 114-E Entrances, Storefronts & Curtain Walls Daniels Glass $196,058.00 $2,940.00 $198,998.00 $198,998.00 8 $251,560.00 $198,998.00 114-F Entrances, Storefronts & Curtain Walls Daniels Glass $179,098.00 $2,680.00 $181,778.00 $181,778.00 8 $225,900.00 $181,778.00 114-H Entrances, Storefronts & Curtain Walls Daniels Glass $213,218.00 $3,200.00 $216,418.00 $216,418.00 8 $265,600.00 $216,418.00 114-D Entrances, Storefronts & Curtain Walls Preferred Glass, Inc. $68,000.00 $980.00 $68,980.00 $68,980.00 8 $162,700.00 $68,980.00 115 Metal Studs/Gypsum Board ANM Construction Co. $553,200.00 $5,050.00 $558,250.00 $558,250.00 2 $584,801.00 $558,250.00 116 Hard Tile DF Floor Covering $72,908.00 $1,823.00 $74,731.00 $74,731.00 4 $87,900.00 $74,731.00 117-E Acoustical Ceilings Clark Contracting Services $94,750.00 $950.00 $95,700.00 $95,700.00 3 $141,045.00 $95,700.00 117-F Acoustical Ceilings Clark Contracting Services $94,750.00 $950.00 $95,700.00 $95,700.00 3 $141,200.00 $95,700.00 117-H Acoustical Ceilings Clark Contracting Services $95,150.00 $950.00 $96,100.00 $96,100.00 3 $141,200.00 $96,100.00 117-D Acoustical Ceilings Clark Contracting Services $92,850.00 $950.00 $93,800.00 $93,800.00 3 $158,620.00 $93,800.00 118-E Carpet/Resilient Flooring Cohns Commercial Floor Covering $55,885.00 $600.00 $56,485.00 $56,485.00 6 $75,631.00 $56,485.00 118-F Carpet/Resilient Flooring Cohns Commercial Floor Covering $55,885.00 $600.00 $56,485.00 $2,975.00 $59,460.00 6 $75,631.00 $56,485.00 118-H Carpet/Resilient Flooring Cohns Commercial Floor Covering $79,995.00 $800.00 $80,795.00 $80,795.00 6 $120,443.00 $80,795.00 118-D Carpet/Resilient Flooring Cohns Commercial Floor Covering $45,998.00 $500.00 $46,498.00 $75,569.00 $122,067.00 6 $63,681.00 $46,498.00 119 Terazzo Flooring Michielutti $47,600.00 $0.00 $47,600.00 $47,600.00 1 $48,500.00 $48,500.00 120-E Painting R&G Painting $39,900.00 $0.00 $39,900.00 $23,500.00 $63,400.00 9 $86,000.00 $39,900.00 120-F Painting R&G Painting $42,550.00 $0.00 $42,550.00 $23,500.00 $66,050.00 9 $86,000.00 $42,550.00 120-H Painting Papa's Painting $44,650.00 $1,120.00 $45,770.00 $9,670.00 $6,550.00 $61,990.00 9 $86,000.00 $44,950.00 120-D Painting Papa's Painting $11,880.00 $0.00 $11,880.00 $11,880.00 9 $30,500.00 $12,180.00 124 Wood Flooring Varsity Sports Flooring $142,000.00 $2,840.00 $144,840.00 $144,840.00 4 $157,550.00 $144,840.00 125 Toilet Compartments R.E. Leggette $83,730.00 $680.00 $84,410.00 $84,410.00 1 $84,410.00 $84,410.00 128 Casework Architectural Systems Group LLC $128,500.00 $700.00 $129,200.00 $129,200.00 2 $153,020.00 $129,200.00 130 Window Treatments Triangle Window Fashions, Inc. $28,167.00 $0.00 $28,167.00 $28,167.00 2 $28,602.00 $22,630.00 131 Athletic Equipment C&M Associates Inc. $43,260.00 $0.00 $43,260.00 $43,260.00 3 $48,533.00 $43,260.00 137 Food Service Equipment Stafford-Smith, Inc. $140,406.62 $842.00 $141,248.62 $141,248.62 3 $155,027.35 $141,248.62 140-E Plumbing Contrast Mechanical, Inc. $185,000.00 $1,800.00 $186,800.00 $186,800.00 6 $696,000.00 $186,800.00 140-F Plumbing Contrast Mechanical, Inc. $185,000.00 $1,800.00 $186,800.00 $186,800.00 6 $696,000.00 $186,800.00 140-H Plumbing Contrast Mechanical, Inc. $185,000.00 $1,800.00 $186,800.00 $186,800.00 5 $696,000.00 $186,800.00 140-D Plumbing Tempco Mechanical Contractors, Inc. $182,500.00 $3,500.00 $186,000.00 $186,000.00 4 $582,200.00 $186,000.00 141 Fire Suppression Absolute Fire Protection, Inc. $47,907.00 $0.00 $47,907.00 $47,907.00 3 $84,080.00 $48,657.00 142-E HVAC Gee & Missler $358,700.00 $4,400.00 $363,100.00 $363,100.00 7 $696,000.00 $401,650.00 142-F HVAC Quality Aire Systems $359,000.00 $2,650.00 $361,650.00 $43,000.00 $404,650.00 7 $696,000.00 $404,650.00 142-H HVAC Gee & Missler $361,700.00 $4,400.00 $366,100.00 $366,100.00 6 $696,000.00 $401,650.00 142-D HVAC Quality Aire Systems $390,000.00 $2,925.00 $392,925.00 $392,925.00 6 $553,000.00 $392,925.00 143-E Electrical Great Lakes Power and Light $835,000.00 $10,000.00 $845,000.00 $72,000.00 $917,000.00 4 $1,140,000.00 $845,000.00 143-F Electrical Great Lakes Power and Light $786,000.00 $10,000.00 $796,000.00 $73,000.00 $869,000.00 4 $1,140,000.00 $796,000.00 143-H Electrical Great Lakes Power and Light $786,000.00 $10,000.00 $796,000.00 $72,000.00 $868,000.00 5 $1,194,428.00 $796,000.00 143-D Electrical Great Lakes Power and Light $589,000.00 $8,000.00 $597,000.00 $597,000.00 4 $841,078.00 $597,000.00 149 Fencing Nationwide Construction Group $34,971.00 $0.00 $34,971.00 $34,971.00 6 $65,044.00 $34,971.00 $17,080,076.62 $192,267.00 -$27,000.00 $17,245,343.62 $380,114.00 $49,550.00 $17,675,007.62 393 $25,973,868.35 $16,571,723.62

Packet page 84 of 126 McCarthy Smith, Inc. Project: PCCS BP #EL-1 - Elementary Additions Renovation Owner: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools Date: 2/15/2021

Budget Summary Construction Budget $22,053,613.57 Excludes Playground $1,600,000.00 Revised Construction Budget $20,453,613.57 Base Bid Total $17,245,343.62 Alternate #1A - Dodson Carpeting $74,501.00 Alternate #1B - Dodson Carpeting $25,468.00 Alternate #2A - Eriksson Paint Ceiling Grid $23,500.00 Alternate #2B - Field Paint Ceiling Grid $23,500.00 Alternate #2C - Hulsing Paint Ceiling Grid $9,670.00 Alternate #3A - Field Casework Removal/Carpet $7,475.00 Alternate #4A - Eriksson Fire Alarm $72,000.00 Alternate #4B - Field Fire Alarm $72,000.00 Alternate #4C - Hulsing Fire Alarm $72,000.00 Voluntary Alternate (Painting) - Added Cost for Electrical Schedule $6,550.00 Voluntary Alternate (HVAC) - Provide RTU Screen $43,000.00

Total: $17,675,007.62 Variance: $2,778,605.95 13.58%

Packet page 85 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 101: Earthwork Best Asphalt Inc. Fessler & Bowman, Inc. Cortis Brothers Trucking & Excavating Eagle Excavation, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Barb Page Submitted by Adam Zeug Submitted by Joseph Robinson Submitted by Burt Grifka Base Bid $1,199,426 $1,314,110 $1,399,000 $1,402,900

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Revision #2, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $1,199,426 $1,314,110 $1,399,000 $1,402,900 Lump Sum Bid for Earthwork /Site Utilities Bid Division at Eriksson Elementary $334,000 $350,600 $402,930 $411,500 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $2,000 $3,700 $4,070 $3,000 Lump Sum Bid for Earthwork / Site Utilities Bid Division at Field Elementary is $359,000 $383,465 $412,830 $398,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $2,266 $4,600 $4,170 $3,000 Lump Sum Bid for Earthwork / Site Utilities Bid Division at Hulsing Elementary is 311000 358260 372240 341500 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $1,960 $4,300 $3,760 $2,500 Lump Sum Bid for Earthwork / Site Utilities Bid Division at Dodson Elementary is $188,000 $206,685 $197,010 $241,500 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bond to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $1,200 $2,500 $1,990 $1,900

ALTERNATES

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BIDS FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter in Bid Division and Bid Deduct ) $50,000

INCLUSIONS 0 0 0 0 Bidder has signed and uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form. YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran BidderLinked hasBusiness signed Affidavit and uploaded Form. the YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form. YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 1199426 1314110 1399000 1402900

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 86 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 102: Asphalt Paving S & J Asphalt Paving Co. Nagle Paving Company Best Asphalt Inc. Als Asphalt Paving Asphalt Specialists, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Marc Olds Submitted by Chris Leideker Submitted by Barb Page Submitted by Amanda Dixon Submitted by Paul Myers Base Bid $1,209,800 $1,239,110 $1,272,850 $1,288,351 $1,327,700

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Revision #1, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $1,209,800 $1,239,110 $1,272,850 $1,288,351 $1,327,700 Lump Sum Bid for Asphalt Paving / Exterior Concrete at Eriksson Elementary $305,600 $313,390 $324,000 $312,017 $330,000 Cost for Performance and labor & Material Payment Bond to be added to the Base Bid at Eriksson $4,000 $1,600 $2,000 $3,000 $2,400 Lump Sum Bid for Asphalt Paving / Exterior Concrete at Field Elementary $265,000 $263,890 $275,000 $276,937 $287,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $3,600 $1,350 $1,700 $2,500 $2,100 Lump Sum Bid for Asphalt Paving / Exterior Concrete at Hulsing Elementary 278000 302790 296000 315393 312000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $3,900 $1,500 $1,850 $3,000 $2,300 Lump Sum Bid for Asphalt Paving / Exterior Concrete at Dodson Elementary $345,000 $352,790 $370,000 $372,004 $389,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $4,700 $1,800 $2,300 $3,500 $2,900

ALTERNATES

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BID FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid ( enter in Bid Division and Bid Deduct) $0 $0

INCLUSIONS 0 0 0 0 0 Bidder has signed and uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percentYES (Bid Bond or Certified Check). YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form. YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran BidderLinked hasBusiness signed Affidavit and uploaded Form. the YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form. YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 1209800 1239110 1272850 1288351 1327700

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 87 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 103: Selective Demolition - Existing Conditions DKI, International Inc. DTS Contracting, LLC Blue Star, Inc. Great Lakes Environmental & Demolition ServicesChristman Inc. Constructors, Inc. Dore & Associates, Inc. Reese Contracting, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Fred Yacoub Submitted by Joe Stanaj Submitted by Sean Webber Submitted by Karl Keranen Submitted by Andrew Holman Submitted by Jason Dore Submitted by isabella avitia Base Bid $195,300 $216,070 $285,384 $315,495 $348,235 $599,400

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost UnitQty Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $195,300 $216,070 $285,384 $315,495 $348,235 389200 $599,400 Lump Sum Bid for Selective Demolition at Eriksson Elementary $49,000 $56,560 $73,000 $77,600 $96,100 95200 $128,900 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid at Eriksson $900 $1,410 $876 $1,940 $720 1900 $2,700 Lump Sum Bid for Selective Demolition at Field Elementary $49,000 $56,870 $74,500 $79,600 $96,100 99800 $137,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $900 $1,420 $894 $1,990 $720 2000 $2,700 Lump Sum Bid for Selective Demolition at Hulsing Elementary 49900 58650 82500 97600 101550 105700 134460 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $900 $1,460 $990 $2,440 $765 2100 $2,740 Lump Sum Bid for Selective Demolition at Dodson Elementary $44,000 $38,740 $52,000 $53,000 $51,880 80900 $187,200 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $700 $960 $624 $1,325 $400 1600 $3,700

ALTERNATES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Alternate #1A Dodson Carpeting (including PLM Bond) $11,400 $18,920 $17,750 $23,124 $25,220 28500 $4,200 Alternate #1B Dodson Carpeting (including PLM Bond) $5,000 $5,480 $7,750 $9,635 $10,460 11400 $2,000 Alternate #2D Eriksson Ceiling Grid Removal (including PLM Bond) $13,000 $15,920 $17,450 $31,119 $25,500 35000 $28,700 Alternate #2E Field Ceiling Grid Removal (including PLM Bond) 13000 15920 17650 31119 25500 33200 34700 Alternate #2F Hulsing Ceiling Grid Removal (including PLM Bond) 13000 15920 17900 31119 25500 34300 33800 Alternate #3A Field Casework Removal (including PLM Bond) $3,500 $3,260 $1,800 $3,895 $4,500 3200 $2,200

COMBINED BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BID FOR SUCH COMBINATIONS)

Combined Bid 11070 0 0 0

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the BidderIran Linked has signedBusiness and Affidavit uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 195300 216070 285384 315495 348235 389200 599400

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 88 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 104: Concrete Footings & Foundation North Channel Construction Midtown Group, LLC Moretti Foundation CI Contracting 6K Construction Co., Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by David Glowski Submitted by Matthew Cosby Submitted by Dennis Moretti Submitted by Marc Messina Submitted by Brian Lahaie Base Bid $326,977 $337,204 $395,650 $449,046 $540,936

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $326,977 $337,204 $395,650 $449,046 $540,936 Lump Sum Bid for Concrete Footings and Foundations at Eriksson Elementary $87,820 $93,486 $109,500 $120,800 $147,815 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added for Erikssonto the Base Bid $1,590 $1,402 $2,190 $1,700 $3,000 Lump Sum Bid for Concrete Footings and Foundations at Field Elementary $92,920 $93,486 $109,500 $125,600 $147,815 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $1,682 $1,402 $2,190 $1,734 $3,000 Lump Sum Bid for Concrete Footings and Foundations at Hulsing Elementary 87920 93486 109500 130650 147815 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $1,590 $1,402 $2,190 $1,800 $3,000 Lump Sum Bid for Concrete Footings and Foundations at Dodson Elementary $52,500 $51,770 $59,400 $65,850 $86,691 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added for Dodson $955 $770 $1,180 $912 $1,800

ALTERNATES

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

COMBINED BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BIFS FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter in Bid Division and Bid Deduct) $5,000 $0

ADDITIONAL ITEMS Combined Total Deduct with BD 105 Concrete Flatwork $10,320

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID 0 0 0 0 0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran BidderLinked hasBusiness signed Affidavit and uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 326977 337204 395650 449046 540936

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 89 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 105 : Concrete Flatwork Midtown Group, LLC Clark Contracting Services Albanelli Cement Contractors, Inc. Contek Inc Metropolitan Concrete Corp. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Matthew Cosby Submitted by Laura Ottman Submitted by Nick Silveri Submitted by Dan Lester Submitted by Tony Volpe Base Bid $317,792 $330,550 $332,400 $362,505 $369,875

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $317,792 $330,550 $332,400 $362,505 $369,875 Lump Sum Bid for Interior Concrete Flatwork at Eriksson Elementary $88,635 $92,507 $92,200 $101,960 $102,525 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $1,330 $925 $1,400 $1,500 $1,500 Lump Sum Bid for Interior Concrete Flatwork at Field Elementary $88,635 $92,507 $92,200 $101,960 $102,525 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $1,330 $925 $1,400 $1,500 $1,500 Lump Sum Bid for Interior Concrete Flatwork at Hulsing Elementry 88635 92507 92200 101960 102525 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $1,330 $925 $1,400 $1,500 $1,500 Lump Sum Bid for Interior Concrete Flatwork at Dodson Elementary $47,140 $49,756 $50,800 $51,325 $56,900 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $757 $498 $800 $800 $900

ALTERNATES

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BIDS FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter in Bid Division and Deduct) $0 $0 $0 $0

ADDITIONAL ITEMS Combined Total Deduct with BD 104 Footings and Foundations $10,320

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID 0 0 0 0 0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran BidderLinked hasBusiness signed Affidavit and uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 317792 330550 332400 362505 369875

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 90 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 106: Masonry HMC Mason Contractors Baker Construction Co., Inc. Schiffer Mason Contractors, Inc. Connolly Masonry, Inc. Davenport Masonry, Inc. Leidal & Hart Mason Contractors, Inc. J&J Construction Company Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Julie Gentile Submitted by Micah Johnson Submitted by Brian Pixley Submitted by John Connolly Submitted by Greig Carnevale Submitted by Brad Leidal Submitted by J&J Construction Base Bid $1,246,720 $2,011,745 $2,035,323 $2,039,725 $2,072,108 $2,126,130 $2,174,400

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $1,246,720 $2,011,745 $2,035,323 $2,039,725 $2,072,108 $2,126,130 $2,174,400 Lump Sum Bid for Masonry at Eriksson Elementary $755,870 $543,365 $542,000 $560,400 $554,000 $579,900 $546,300 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $9,030 $4,775 $5,168 $7,725 $4,590 $4,500 $8,200

Lump Sum Bid for Masonry at Field Elementary $0 $542,715 $541,000 $560,400 $554,000 $579,900 $571,500 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $0 $4,770 $5,160 $7,725 $4,590 $4,500 $8,500

Lump Sum Bid for Masonry at Hulsing Elementary 0 543365 544000 560400 555000 569900 586700 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $0 $4,775 $5,185 $7,725 $4,596 $4,450 $8,800

Lump Sum Bid for Masonry at Dodson Elementary $476,130 $364,695 $389,000 $330,600 $392,000 $379,900 $437,900 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $5,690 $3,285 $3,810 $4,750 $3,332 $3,080 $6,500

ALTERNATES

COMBINED BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BIDS FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter in Bid Division and Deduct) $20,000 -$23,108 $30,000

INCLUSIONS

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the BidderIran Linked has signedBusiness and Affidavit uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $1,246,720 $2,011,745 $2,035,323 $2,039,725 $2,072,108 $2,126,130 $2,174,400

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 91 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 107: Metals Judd Industrial Contracting, Inc. Morkin and Sowards, Inc. Zak Welding & Custom Work,LLC Cass Erectors, Inc. Vertex Steel, Inc. Nelson Iron Works Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Ron Pawlak Submitted by David Arp Submitted by PAUL BHAVSAR Submitted by Timothy Meagher Submitted by Jim Cortopassi Submitted by John Knill Base Bid $657,109 $729,700 $769,425 $898,040 $924,655 $977,619

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $657,109 $729,700 $769,425 $898,040 $924,655 $977,619 Lump Sum Bid for Structural Steel at Eriksson Elementary $189,500 $211,000 $220,850 $251,250 $259,000 $286,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $2,842 $4,200 $3,300 $2,512 $2,590 $2,948 Lump Sum Bid for Structural Steel at Field Elementary $189,500 $211,000 $220,850 $251,250 $259,000 $286,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $2,842 $4,200 $3,300 $2,512 $2,590 $2,948 Lump Sum Bid for Structural Steel at Hulsing 192500 211000 220850 251250 259000 286000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $2,887 $4,200 $3,300 $2,512 $2,590 $2,948 Lump Sum Bid for Structural Steel at Dodson Elementary $75,900 $82,500 $95,550 $135,400 $138,500 $109,500 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $1,138 $1,600 $1,425 $1,354 $1,385 $1,275

ALTERNATES

COMBINED BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BIDS FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter in Bid Division and Deduct) $7,000

INCLUSIONS

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran BidderLinked hasBusiness signed Affidavit and uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $657,109 $729,700 $769,425 $898,040 $924,655 $977,619

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 92 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 108: Carpentry / General Trades Wally Kosorski & Company, Inc. The Spieker Company Clark Contracting Services Construction Solutions, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Christine Bowen Submitted by SanTanna Gomez Submitted by Laura Ottman Submitted by James Kugler Base Bid $588,661 $613,150 $697,500 $802,200

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $588,661 $613,150 $697,500 $802,200 Lump Sum Bid for Carpentry / General Trades at Eriksson Elementary $162,750 $177,700 $197,275 $228,400 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $2,720 $1,500 $1,972 $4,000 Lump Sum Bid for Carpentry / General Trades at Field Elementary $160,554 $173,700 $200,775 $225,100 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $2,690 $1,500 $2,007 $4,000 Lump Sum Bid for Carpentry / General Trades at Hulsing 161760 179900 197975 227800 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $2,707 $1,500 $1,975 $4,000 Lump Sum Bid for Carpentry / General Trades at Dodson Elementary $93,630 $76,700 $94,575 $106,900 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $1,850 $650 $946 $2,000

ALTERNATES

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BIDS FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter in Bid Division and Deduct) $0 $56,200

INCLUSIONS

$0 $0 $0 $0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $588,661 $613,150 $697,500 $802,200

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 93 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 109: Membrane Roofing CentiMark Corporation Newton & Crane, Inc. Lutz Roofing Company, Inc. Bloom Roofing Quality Roofing Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Jeff Mollard Submitted by DON CIAMPICHINI Submitted by Lutz Roofing Submitted by Sales Department Submitted by Mike Base Bid $1,922,770 $2,622,000 $3,190,790 $3,494,300 $4,122,374

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $1,922,770 $2,622,000 $3,190,790 $3,494,300 $4,122,374 Lump Sum Bid for Roofing / Sheetmeal at Eriksson Elementary $565,000 $725,000 $755,110 $958,000 $1,161,506 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $5,235 $11,000 $7,500 $9,500 $6,500 Lump Sum Bid for Roofing / Sheetmetal at Field Elementary $565,000 $725,000 $762,450 $958,000 $1,161,506 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $5,235 $11,000 $7,500 $9,500 $6,500 Lump Sum Bid for Roofing / Sheetmetal at Hulsing Elementary 565000 725000 773120 958000 1161506 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $5,235 $11,000 $7,500 $9,500 $6,500 Lump Sum Bid for Roofing / Sheetmetal at Dodson Elementary $210,650 $408,000 $442,110 $586,000 $611,856 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $1,415 $6,000 $435,500 $5,800 $6,500

ALTERNATES

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BID FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter in Bid Division and Deduct) $25,000 $0 $22,650 $0

ADDITIONAL ITEMS We have provided a Alternate pricing for a overlay on each location. Pricing will be on the proposals provided in the download. All Scopes of work are for a 20 year warranty and is for a 60 Mil TPO fastened system. $1

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID 0 0 0 0 0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) NO YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 1922770 2622000 3190790 3494300 4122374

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 94 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 112: Joint Protection Industrial Services Inc. RAM Construction Services D.C. Byers Company, Inc. BNE Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Dan Creger Submitted by Kristen Wickens Submitted by Brenda Nelson Submitted by Brian Anton Base Bid $65,186 $81,505 $82,850 $90,288

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Revision #1, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $65,186 $81,505 $82,850 $90,288

Lump Sum Bid for Caulking $63,386 $80,300 $81,625 $88,400 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $1,800 $1,205 $1,225 $1,888

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $65,186 $81,505 $82,850 $90,288

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $17,699 $23,500 $11,627 $21,167

Field Elementary 17399 23500 23741 22261 Hulsing Elementary 17429 23500 23741 21509 Dodson Elementary 12659 9800 23741 25351

Packet page 95 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 114: Entrances, Storefronts & Curtain Walls Daniels Glass Inc. Aalcor Inc. Hewett Company Peterson Glass Company Preferred Glass Inc Glasco Corp. Trenko Glass B&B Glass Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Chris Mandelka Submitted by JOE BAKER Submitted by William Hewett Submitted by James Hickey Submitted by Howard Beindit Submitted by ed sullivan Submitted by Martin baecker Submitted by Sue Pickel Base Bid $686,050 $705,400 $708,600 $729,895 $741,760 $796,840 $833,500 $905,760

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $686,050 $705,400 $708,600 $729,895 $741,760 $796,840 $833,500 $905,760 Lump Sum Bid for Aluminum Entrances / Storefront / Glass & Glazing at Eriksson Elementary $196,058 $204,000 $203,000 $209,582 $216,500 $228,800 $227,000 $246,900 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $2,940 $2,500 $3,000 $2,190 $3,125 $2,288 $7,000 $4,660

Lump Sum Bid for Aluminum Entrances / Storefront / Glass & Glazing at Field Elementary $179,098 $185,000 $186,300 $194,563 $200,750 $210,000 $207,000 $221,700 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added for Field $2,680 $2,300 $2,800 $2,080 $2,900 $2,100 $6,000 $4,200 Lump Sum Bid for Aluminum Entrances / Storefront / Glass & Glazing at Hulsing Elementary 213218 229900 236000 232367 245965 253000 256000 261000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $3,200 $2,800 $3,500 $2,420 $3,540 $2,530 $8,000 $4,600 Lump Sum Bid for Aluminum Entrances / Storefront / Glass & Glazing at Dodson Elementary $87,546 $77,900 $73,000 $85,578 $68,000 $97,150 $119,000 $159,900 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $1,310 $1,000 $1,000 $1,115 $980 $972 $3,500 $2,800

ALTERNATES

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BIDS FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter Bid Division and Deduct) $5,800

INCLUSIONS

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the BidderIran Linked has signedBusiness and Affidavit uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $686,050 $705,400 $708,600 $729,895 $741,760 $796,840 $833,500 $905,760

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

SCHEDULE INFORMATION

Packet page 96 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 115: Gypsum Board ANM Construction Co. Inc. R.E. Leggette Co. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Catherine Smith Submitted by David Beyer Base Bid $558,250 $584,801

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $558,250 $584,801

Lump Sum Bid for Metal Studs / Drywall $553,200 $577,296 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $5,050 $7,505

INCLUSIONS

0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES

Base Bid Total $558,250 $584,801

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $171,400 $184,677

Field Elementary 175850 184677 Hulsing Elementary 171400 184677 Dodson Elementary 39600 30770

Packet page 97 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 116: Hard Tile DF Floor Covering Continental Contracting Co., LLC DTS Contracting, LLC Michielutti Brothers Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Lisa Welsby Submitted by Xhuliano Pjetrushi Submitted by Joe Stanaj Submitted by John Michielutti Base Bid $74,731 $85,250 $87,050 $87,900

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $74,731 $85,250 $87,050 $87,900

Lump Sum Bid for Hard Tile $72,908 $84,250 $84,950 $86,300 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $1,823 $1,000 $2,100 $1,600

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $74,731 $85,250 $87,050 $87,900

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $15,643 $17,250 $17,980 $17,900

Field Elementary 15643 17250 17980 17900 Hulsing Elementary 15643 17250 17980 Dodson Elementary 27802 33500 33110

Packet page 98 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 117: Acoustical Ceilings Clark Contracting Services R.E. Leggette Co. ANM Construction Co. Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Laura Ottman Submitted by Richard Landacre Submitted by Catherine Smith Base Bid $381,300 $475,100 $582,065

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $381,300 $475,100 $582,065 Lump Sum Bid for Acoustical Treatment at Eriksson Elementary $94,750 $119,000 $139,845 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $950 $1,700 $1,200 Lump Sum Bid for Acoustical Treatment at Field Elementary $94,750 $119,000 $140,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $950 $1,700 $1,200 Lump Sum Bid for Acoustical Treatment at Hulsing Elementary 95150 119000 140000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $950 $1,700 $1,200 Lump Sum Bid for Acoustical Treatment at Dodson Elementary $92,850 $111,400 $157,320 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $950 $1,600 $1,300

ALTERNATES $0 $0 $0 Alternate #2D Eriksson Ceiling Grid Removal (including PLM Bond) $69,500 $53,830 $68,500 Alternate #2E Field Ceiling Grid Removal (including PLM Bond) $69,500 $53,830 $68,500 Alternate #2F Hulsing Ceiling Grid Removal (including PLM Bond) $69,500 $53,830 $68,500

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL BASE BID FOR SUCH COMBINATION) Combined Bid (enter bid division and deduct) $0 $0

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID 0 0 0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 381300 475100 582065

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 99 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

Bd 118: Carpet / Resilient Flooring Turner Brooks Cohns Commercial Floor Covering, Inc. Shock Brothers Floorcovering, Inc. Conventional Carpet, Inc. Continental Contracting Co., LLC DF Floor Covering Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Niklas Schnorr-Deskins Submitted by Lucas Beiswanger Submitted by Daniel Shock Submitted by Jeff Cardinali Submitted by Xhuliano Pjetrushi Submitted by Lisa Welsby Base Bid $232,119 $240,263 $290,900 $294,042 $296,000 $335,386

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Revision #1, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $232,119 $240,263 $290,900 $294,042 $296,000 $335,386 Lump Sum Bid for Carpet / Resilient Tile Flooring at Eriksson Elementary $63,102 $55,885 $66,000 $63,959 $64,000 $74,927 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $631 $600 $520 $768 $800 $704 Lump Sum Bid for Carpet / Resilient Tile Flooring at Field Elementary $64,203 $55,885 $65,500 $64,636 $64,000 $74,927 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $642 $600 $500 $780 $800 $704 Lump Sum Bid for Carpet / Resilient Flooring at Hulsing Elementary 101880 79995 108000 106494 110000 119364 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $1,108 $800 $980 $1,284 $1,300 $1,079 Lump Sum Bid for Acoustical Treatment at Dodson Elementary $0 $45,998 $49,000 $55,449 $54,500 $63,088 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $553 $500 $400 $672 $600 $593

ADDITIONAL ITEMS Hulsing pricing is for flooring not acoustical treatment

ALTERNATES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alternate #1A Dodson Carpeting (including PLM Bond) 62853 55581 56000 52482 56600 59393 Alternate #1B Dodson Carpeting (including PLM Bond) 17472 19988 30000 26555 28300 29173 Alternate #3A Field Carpeting (including PLM Bond) $6,038 $2,975 $3,200 $3,316 $2,700 $4,242

COMBINED BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BID FOR SUCH COMBINATIONS) Combine Bid (enter bid division and deduct) 0 3000 20744

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran BidderLinked hasBusiness signed Affidavit and uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 232119 240263 290900 294042 296000 335386

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 100 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 119: Terrazzo Flooring Michielutti Brothers Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by John Michielutti Base Bid $48,500

Original Proposal, February 3, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $48,500

Lump Sum Bid for Hard Tile $47,600 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $900

INCLUSIONS

0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES

Base Bid Total $48,500

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 101 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 120: Painting R&G Painting Home Improvement LLC Papa's Painting Classic Painting Company, Inc. G.M. Painting, Inc. E.L. Painting Co. DTS Contracting, LLC GV Painting LLC Seven Brothers Painting Continental Contracting Co., LLC Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Gentian Nonaj Submitted by Govani Lulgjuraj Submitted by Stephine Sholty Submitted by Harry Meidanis Submitted by Tim Nikou Submitted by Joe Stanaj Submitted by Josh Vushaj Submitted by Samuel Fortuna Submitted by Xhuliano Pjetrushi Base Bid $143,900 $149,490 $154,270 $181,930 $215,110 $219,200 $240,125 $255,415 $288,500

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 3, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $143,900 $149,490 $154,270 $181,930 $215,110 $219,200 $240,125 $255,415 $288,500

Lump Sum Bid for Painting at Eriksson Elementary $39,900 $44,650 $44,600 $53,950 $64,250 $66,000 $70,630 $69,915 $85,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $0 $1,120 $1,115 $1,400 $2,200 $1,600 $2,120 $1,750 $1,000

Lump Sum Bid for Painting at Field Elementary $42,550 $44,650 $46,300 $53,950 $64,250 $65,000 $70,575 $78,190 $85,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $0 $1,120 $1,160 $1,300 $2,200 $1,600 $2,120 $1,955 $1,000

Lump Sum Bid for Painting at Hulsing Elementary 44950 44650 44900 53950 64250 66000 72025 78195 85000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $0 $1,120 $1,125 $1,300 $2,200 $1,600 $2,160 $1,955 $1,000

Lump Sum Bid for Painting at Dodson Elementary $16,500 $11,880 $14,700 $15,580 $15,260 $17,000 $19,895 $22,880 $30,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $0 $300 $370 $500 $500 $400 $600 $575 $500

ALTERNATES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alternate #A2 Eriksson Ceiling Grid Painting (including PLM Bond) $23,500 $9,670 $34,850 $37,950 $7,500 $40,000 $25,750 $46,900 $25,000 Alternate #2B Field Ceiling Grid Painting (including PLM Bond) $23,500 $9,670 $35,250 $37,950 $7,500 $40,000 $24,965 $44,540 $25,000 Alternate #2C Hulsing Ceiling Grid Painting (including PLM Bond) $23,500 $9,670 $26,400 $37,950 $6,500 $40,000 $25,300 $44,590 $25,000

COMBINED BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF THE BASE BID FOR SUCH COMBINATION) Combined Bid (enter in bid division and deduct) $0 $0 $1,200 $12,000 $9,200 $0 $0 $3,500

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the BidderIran Linked has signedBusiness and Affidavit uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 143900 149490 154270 181930 215110 219200 240125 255415 288500

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 102 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 124: Wood Flooring Star Flooring Corporation Varsity Sports Flooring. Foster Specialty Floors Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Dawn Elliott Submitted by Peter Agnello Submitted by Ben Vanaman Base Bid $99,000 $144,840 $157,550

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $99,000 $144,840 $157,550

Lump Sum Bid for Wood Flooring $98,000 $142,000 $154,550 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $1,000 $2,840 $3,000

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $99,000 $144,840 $157,550

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $28,000 $45,800 $48,008

Field Elementary 28000 45800 48008.27 Hulsing Elementary 28,000.00 $45,800.00 48,008.27 Dodson Elementary 14,000.00 $7,440.00 13525.2

Packet page 103 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 125: Toilet Compartments R.E. Leggette Co. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Matthew Fix Base Bid $84,410

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $84,410

Lump Sum Bid for Toilet Partitions $83,730 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $680

INCLUSIONS

0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES

Base Bid Total $84,410

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $24,045

Field Elementary 23865 Hulsing Elementary 25935 Dodson Elementary 10565

Packet page 104 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 128: Casework Architectural Systems Group LLC FCI Group LLC Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Dawn Harmsen Submitted by Doug Farnell Base Bid $129,200 $153,020

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $129,200 $153,020

Lump Sum Bid for Prefabricated Casework $128,500 $151,505 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $700 $1,515

INCLUSIONS

0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES

Base Bid Total $129,200 $153,020

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $21,965 $23,990

Field Elementary 21965 23990 Hulsing Elementary 21965 23990 Dodson Elementary 63305 81050

Packet page 105 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 130: Window Treatments The Sheer Shop Triangle Window Fashions, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Kristen Bernat Submitted by Richard Secord Base Bid $22,630 $28,602

Original Proposal, February 3, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $22,630 $28,602

Lump Sum Bid for Window Treatments $22,168 $28,167 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $462 $435

INCLUSIONS

0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES

Base Bid Total $22,630 $28,602

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $0 $5,321

Field Elementary 0 5327 Hulsing Elementary 5924 5321 Dodson Elementary 16706 12198

SCHEDULE INFORMATION

Packet page 106 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 131: Athletic Equipment C & M Associates, Inc. Gardiner C. Vose, Inc. Bareman & Associates, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Ben Hurst Submitted by Jack Furlong Submitted by Chad Huttinga Base Bid $43,680 $47,975 $48,533

Original Proposal, February 3, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $43,680 $47,975 $48,533

Lump Sum Bid for Gymnasium Equipment $43,260 $47,485 $48,085 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $420 $490 $448

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $43,680 $47,975 $48,533

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $14,560 $4,675 $16,178

Field Elementary 14560 14270 16178 Hulsing Elementary 14560 14270 16177 Dodson Elementary 0 14270 0

SCHEDULE INFORMATION

Packet page 107 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 137: Foodservice Equipment Stafford-Smith, Inc Great Lakes Hotel Supply Company Gold Star Products Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Mariah Boone Submitted by Enis Guzelaydin Submitted by Luke Rygh Base Bid $141,249 $147,783 $155,027

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $141,249 $147,783 $155,027

Lump Sum Bid for Food Service Equipment $140,407 $146,975 $152,227 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $842 $808 $2,800

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $141,249 $147,783 $155,027

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 108 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 140: Plumbing Contrast Mechanical, Inc. Tempco Mechanical Contractors, inc. S D Mechanical Services Inc Danboise Mechanical Inc. Quality Aire Systems Long Mechanical, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Paul Bowers Submitted by Jim Jagodzinski Submitted by Scott Preseau Submitted by Tim Lehto Submitted by Chris Marinkovich Submitted by Jim Ballantine Base Bid $560,400 $658,000 $830,850 $1,401,207 $2,569,900 $2,641,000

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Revision #2, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $560,400 $658,000 $830,850 $1,401,207 $2,569,900 $2,641,000 Lump Sum Bid for Plumbing at Eriksson Elementary $185,000 $238,000 $272,250 $374,944 $657,000 $682,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $1,800 $4,500 $4,700 $5,155 $4,900 $14,000

Lump Sum Bid for Plumbing at Field Elementary $185,000 $225,000 $272,250 $374,944 $659,000 $682,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $1,800 $4,500 $4,700 $5,155 $4,900 $14,000 Lump Sum Bid for Plumbing at Hulsing Elementary 185000 0 272250 374944 657000 682000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $1,800 $0 $4,700 $5,155 $4,900 $14,000 Lump Sum Bid for Plumbing at Dodson Elementary $0 $182,500 $0 $257,516 $578,000 $542,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $0 $3,500 $0 $3,394 $4,200 $11,000

ALTERNATES

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL OF BASE BID FOR SUCH COMBINATION OF BID) Combine Bid (enter in bid division and deduct) $0 $0 $

ADDITIONAL ITEMS Deduct $70,000 if awarded all 4 schools combined, unless already low on all 4 schools. Also listed in voluntary alternates below -$70,000

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran BidderLinked hasBusiness signed Affidavit and uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 560400 658000 830850 1401207 2569900 2641000

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 109 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 141: Fire Suppression Absolute Fire Protection, Inc. Wolverine Fire Protection Professional Sprinkler, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Kristina Krantz Submitted by Jill Terwilliger Submitted by William Case Base Bid $48,657 $59,366 $84,080

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 2, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $48,657 $59,366 $84,080

Lump Sum Bid for Fire Protection $47,907 $58,766 $81,880 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $750 $600 $2,200

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran Linked Business Affidavit Form YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $48,657 $59,366 $84,080

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $6,543 $0 $40,340

Field Elementary 6543 0 14580 Hulsing Elementary 6543 0 14580 Dodson Elementary 28278 59366 14580

SCHEDULE INFORMATION

Packet page 110 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 142: Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning Tempco Mechanical Contractors, inc. Contrast Mechanical, Inc. Quality Aire Systems Miller-Boldt, Inc. Gee & Missler, Inc. Great Lakes Mechanical Long Mechanical, Inc. Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Jim Jagodzinski Submitted by Paul Bowers Submitted by Chris Marinkovich Submitted by Clint Miller Submitted by Dan Gee Submitted by Neal Umlor Submitted by Jim Ballantine Base Bid $780,200 $1,233,000 $1,471,875 $1,596,000 $1,616,500 $1,774,570 $2,641,000

Revision #1, February 4, 2021 Revision #1, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $780,200 $1,233,000 $1,471,875 $1,596,000 $1,616,500 $1,774,570 $2,641,000

Lump Sum Bid for HVAC at Eriksson Elementary $385,200 $407,000 $356,000 $366,000 $358,700 $436,000 $682,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $7,500 $4,000 $2,650 $4,000 $4,400 $4,360 $14,000 Lump Sum Bid for HVAC at Field Elementary $380,000 $407,000 $359,000 $376,000 $364,900 $437,000 $682,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $7,500 $4,000 $2,650 $4,500 $4,400 $4,370 $14,000

Lump Sum Bid for HVAC at Hulsing Elementary 0 407000 356000 366000 361700 438000 682000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $0 $4,000 $2,650 $4,500 $4,400 $4,380 $14,000

Lump Sum Bid for HVAC at Dodson Elementary $0 $0 $390,000 $470,000 $511,800 $446,000 $542,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson $0 $0 $2,925 $5,000 $6,200 $4,460 $11,000

ALTERNATES

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

COMBINE BID DEDUCT (THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNT WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL BASE BID FOR SUCH COMBINATION) Combine Bid (enter in Bid Division and Deduct) $0 $0 $

ADDITIONAL ITEMS

Deduct price if awarded all schools $175,000

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the BidderIran Linked has signedBusiness and Affidavit uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total 780200 1233000 1471875 1596000 1616500 1774570 2641000

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Packet page 111 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 143: Electrical Munro Electric Great Lakes Power & Lighting, Inc. Metro Electric Engineering Technologies Green Line Electric LLC Serve Electric Generated February 11, 2021 Submitted by John Munro Submitted by Alan Thueme Submitted by Kristina Perkins Submitted by Greg Abb Submitted by Paul Button Leveled Bid $981,500 $3,034,000 $3,448,000 $3,905,000 $4,262,830 Base Bid $981,500 $3,034,000 $3,448,000 $3,905,000 $4,262,830 Original Proposal, February 11, 2021 Revision #1, February 11, 2021 Original Proposal, February 11, 2021 Revision #1, February 11, 2021 Revision #1, February 11, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $981,500 $3,034,000 $3,448,000 $3,905,000 $4,262,830 Lump Sum Bid for Electrical at Eriksson Elementary $0 $835,000 $954,500 $1,120,000 $1,100,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Eriksson $0 $10,000 $9,500 $20,000 $13,662 Lump Sum Bid for Electrical at Field Elementary 0 786000 954000 1120000 1100000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Field $0 $10,000 $9,000 $20,000 $13,662 Lump Sum Bid for Electrical at Hulsing Elementary $967,000 $786,000 $883,000 $930,000 $1,180,000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Hulsing $14,500 $10,000 $7,000 $15,000 $14,428 Lump Sum Bid for Electrical at Dodson Elementary 0 589000 625000 670000 830000 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid for Dodson 0 8000 6000 10000 11078.1

ALTERNATES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alternate #3A Field Electrical Removal (including PLM Bond) 0 1000 2500 10000 5080 Alternate #4A Eriksson Fire Alarm (including PLM Bond) 0 72000 88000 90000 116821.6 Alternate #4B Field Fire Alarm (including PLM Bond) 0 72000 88000 90000 116821.6 Alternate #4C Hulsing Fire Alarm (including PLM Bond) 68500 72000 88000 90000 116821.6

Packet page 112 of 126 1073-20: Plymouth-Canton Community Schools BP#EL-1 Additions & Remodeling Prepared by McCarthy & Smith, Inc. - 24317 Indoplex Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48335, United States of America Bid Package Lead: Brian Gesaman ([email protected]) Project Location: Plymouth, MI 48170, United States of America

BD 149: Fencing Nationwide Construction Group Zak Welding & Custom Work,LLC American Fence & Supply Company, Inc. Michigan Fence Kimberly Fence Future Fence Company Generated February 5, 2021 Submitted by Scott Keller Submitted by PAUL BHAVSAR Submitted by Kevin Kalinowski Submitted by Rick Porter Submitted by Evan Loshaw Submitted by Future Fence Base Bid $35,171 $42,000 $53,765 $54,730 $58,091 $65,044

Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Original Proposal, February 4, 2021 Revision #1, February 4, 2021

Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Unit Cost Total Cost LINE ITEMS $35,171 $42,000 $53,765 $54,730 $58,091 $65,044

Lump Sum Bid for Fencing $34,971 $41,750 $52,970 $54,000 $56,674 $64,400 Cost for Performance and Labor & Material Payment Bonds, to be added to the Base Bid $200 $250 $795 $730 $1,417 $644

INCLUSIONS

0 0 0 0 0 0 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS MUST BE UPLOADED WITH BID $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bidder has uploaded the Bid Security in the amount of five (5%) percent (Bid Bond or Certified Check) YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Familial Disclosure Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES Bidder has signed and uploaded the Iran BidderLinked hasBusiness signed Affidavit and uploaded Form the YES YES YES YES YES YES Criminal Background Check Affidavit Form YES YES YES YES YES YES

Base Bid Total $35,171 $42,000 $53,765 $54,730 $58,091 $65,044

SCOPE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

COST BREAKDOWN FOR OUR SCOPE OF WORK (INCLUDING PLM BOND)

Eriksson Elementary $9,450 $11,150 $14,407 $14,075 $15,658 $16,800

Field Elementary 9450 11150 14423 14075 15658.38 16800 Hulsing Elementary 9450 11150 14391 14075 15658.38 16800 Dodson Elementary 6821 8300 10544 12505 11115.85 14000

SCHEDULE INFORMATION

Packet page 113 of 126 Action Item # 21-02-48 Meeting Date: February 23, 2021 First and Final Reading

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Office of Chief Finance & Operations Officer

TO: Monica Merritt, Superintendent Board of Education Finance & Operations Committee

FROM: Deborah J. Piesz, Chief Finance & Operations Officer

DATE: February 23, 2021

RE: Approval of Purchase - Picnic Tables for Secondary Schools- First and Final Reading ______

OVERVIEW:

The middle school and high school principals have furnished the numbers of picnic tables they need in order to accommodate students the ability to eat outdoors, thereby helping to accommodate physical distancing guidelines and CDC recommendations, when weather permits.

Director of Operations Tim Gruszczynski has obtained REMC bid pricing, and is recommending that we purchase (116) 96x64 Thermoplastic coated picnic tables and (9) ADA compliant picnic tables from School Specialty in the amount of $111,582.00. These tables will require an 8 week lead time from the date of order.

Consortium Qty. Qty. Vendor Style Delivery Price Organization Reg. ADA School Metal, plastic coated REMC 116 9 8 Weeks $ 111,582.00 Specialties top/Metal frame & legs American Omnia Wood top/Metal legs 116 9 8 Weeks $ 112,316.00 Athletix Partners Thermoplastic planking , Lowes Retail powder-coated steel frame, 125 8 weeks $196,250.00 ADA accessible

This item was discussed at the Finance & Operations Committee meeting held on February 18, 2021.

RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION:

It was moved by Member ______and seconded by Member ______to approve the purchase of 116 regular and 9 ADA compliant picnic tables from School Specialty in the amount of $111,582.00. This cost will be funded with Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (ESSER2 Funds).

Ayes: ______Nays: ______The motion was: ______

Packet page 114 of 126 PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Operations Department

TO: Deborah J. Piesz, Chief Finance & Operations Officer

FROM: Tim Gruszczynski, Director of Operations

DATE: February 22, 2021

RE: Recommended Purchase of 125 Picnic Tables ______We are recommending the purchase of 125 - Ultra Play Systems Inc. 96”L x 64 3/4”W x 30 5/16”H, Thermoplastic coated picnic tables for district High Schools and Middle Schools to accommodate lunch seating needs with regards to social distancing.

The pricing is derived from REMC Bid Contract #: Q-70153. The Regional Educational Media Center Association of Michigan is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.

VENDOR Consortium STYLE Quantity Delivery PRICE Organization HD School REMC Metal, plastic coated 125 8 Weeks $111,582.00 Specialties top/Metal frame & legs American Omnia Partners Metal, plastic coated 125 8 Weeks $112,316.00 Athletix top/Metal frame & legs Lowes n/a Metal, plastic coated 125 8 Weeks $196,250.00 Retail top/Metal frame & legs

The middle schools will disperse lunch population to outdoor seating when weather permits. The tables will be distributed as follows:

School HD Picnic tables ADA Picnic Tables Discovery 10 1 East 6 1 Liberty 20 1 Pioneer 20 1 West 5 1 Canton 15 1 Plymouth 15 1 Salem 15 1 Starkweather 10 1 116 9

Packet page 115 of 126 Created: 2/5/2021 Quote Info: DELIVERED PRICE. PRICING OMNIA PARTNERS Revised: 2/22/2021 . INSTALLATION IS NOT INCLUDED CONTRACT #R191815 . Valid Thru: 5/3/2021 ONE DELIVERY POINT. Delivery Date:

SHIP TO: SOLD TO: PLYMOUTH - CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS PLYMOUTH - CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 454 S HARVEY ST 454 S HARVEY ST PLYMOUTH , MI 48170 PLYMOUTH , MI 48170 UNITED STATES QUOTATION: 025380 # MODEL DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QTY EXTENDED PRICE 1 ???-158V8-??? ULTRA PLAY SYSTEMS INC $891.00 116 $103,356.00

TABLE PICNIC 8' THERMOPLASTIC COATED - SPECIFY COLOR: BLACK

2 ULTRA PLAY SYSTEMS INC $914.00 9 $8,226.00 TABLE PICNIC 8' FT DOUBLE SIDED ADA TABLE THERMOPLASTIC COATED - SPECIFY COLOR: BLACK

Current Mfr Lead Time: 8 weeks ARO

ACCEPTED BY

DATE ACCEPTED TOTAL $111,582.00

JILL MCCRIRIE - STRATEGIC ACT MGR [email protected] (734) 255-0930

Page 1 of 2

Packet page 116 of 126 Sales Team

[email protected]

Notes

"THE PRICE INCLUDED ON THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT INCLUDE TAXES AND WOULD BE ADDED IN ADDITION TO QUOTED SELL PRICE IF APPLICABLE"

Page 2 of 2

Packet page 117 of 126 Quotation Project: Plymouth-Canton picnic tables Date: 2/19/2021 Attn: TimTim Gruszczynski, Gruszczynski, Director Director of Operationsof Operations Quote #: PLC2021-1 Plymouth-Canton Community Schools Expires: 3/19/2021 46181 Joy Road Approx. Lead Time 8 weeks Canton, MI 48187 [email protected] 734-416-2970 Description: KOMPAN

quantity item number description List price each net 9 P238H-V8 8' DOUBLE SIDED EXTRA HEAVY DUTY ADA TABLE $ 1,078.00 $ 862.40 $7,761.60 DIAMOND - PC F

116 P238-V8 8' EXTRA HEAVY DUTY TABLE, DIAMOND PC FRAME $ 1,078.00 $ 862.40 $100,038.40

OMNIA PARTNERS DISCOUNT 5%

VOLUME DISCOUNT 15%

INSTALL PROFESSIONAL INSTALLATION INSTALL: N/A EQUIPMENT TOTAL: $107,800.00 PAYMENT TERMS: DEP 50% & 50% DUE UPON COMPLETION FREIGHT: $4,516.00 TAX: N/A ENGINEERING: NA

Quote Total: $112,316.00

*ACCEPTANCE OF QUOTATION: This quotation is subject to policies in the current catalog and the following terms and conditions. Quotation is based on shipment of all items at the same time to one destination. , unless otherwise noted. Pricing is subject to change beyond expiration date. Purchases in excess of $1000,00 must be supported by a written purchase order to American Athletix, LLC. LEAD TIME: Tentative dates from receipt of deposit (if required); final approved drawings; colors and site prep and readiness. FREIGHT: Freight charges are estimated. Subject to final charges from freight carrier. EXCLUSIONS: Unless specifically included, this quotation excludes: all site work and landscaping; removal and disposal of existing equipment; acceptance of equipment and off-loading; storage of goods prior to installation; equipment assembly and installation; safety surfacing, borders and drainage provisions.

Proposal By: John McDonald, American Athletix, LLC Customer Acknowledges that he/she has read, understands, accepts and agrees to be bound by the Terms and Conditions attached Accepted by: ______Date: ______

Purchase Order: ______

Packet page 118 of 126 CREATE A SPA-WORTHY BATH SPACE. UP TO 40% OFF SELECT BATH ESSENTIALS. SHOP NOW >

picnic tables

Westland Lowe's Open until 9 PM

Prices, Promotions, styles, and availability may vary. Our local stores do not honor online pricing. Prices and availability of products and services are subject to change without notice. Errors will be corrected where discovered, and Lowe's reserves the right to revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions including after an order has been submitted.

Outdoors / Commercial Park Equipment / Park Equipment / Picnic Tables

$1,570.11

1 View Q&A

$ / Month 262 Suggested payments with 6 month special financing. Learn how

UltraPlay 96-in Black Steel Rectangle Picnic Table

Item #31758 Model #PBK238H-V8BK

Ultracoat thermoplastic planking with powdercoated steel frame 2-3/8-in all MIG welded frame ADA accessible Feedback

Manufacturer Color/Finish: Black

1

Qty

Add to Cart

Free Store Pickup Pickup Estimated: Mon, Mar 8, 2021

Delivery Delivery Estimate: Mon, Mar 8, 2021; Schedule Delivery Date in Checkout

OVERVIEW This rectangular ADA accessible picnic table continues to a popular table.

Packet page 119 of 126 Ultracoat thermoplastic planking with powdercoated steel frame 2-3/8-in all MIG welded frame ADA accessible 5-Year limited warranty Comes with all stainless steel hardware Diamond pattern

SPECIFICATIONS

Actual Weight (lbs.) 195 Table Height (Inches) 30

Assembled Depth (Inches) 96 Table Length (Inches) 96

Assembled Height (Inches) 30 Table Width (Inches) 30

Assembled Width (Inches) 70 Warranty 5-year limited

Assembly Required Partial Waterproofing Required Feedback Show All

REVIEWS

5 out of 5

Write a Review

5 1

4 0

Packet page 120 of 126 Show More

COMMUNITY Q & A

Show More

COMPARE

THIS ITEM Feedback

Name

4 OPTIONS AVAILABLE 4 OPTIONS AVAILABLE

UltraPlay 96-in Black UltraPlay 96-in Black Steel Rectangle Picnic Steel Rectangle Picnic Table Table

Show All

CUSTOMERS ALSO VIEWED

Packet page 121 of 126 $1,570.11 $1,570.11 $1,570.11 $1,103.03

1 1 1 1

UltraPlay 96-in Blue Steel UltraPlay 96-in Green Steel UltraPlay 96-in Red Steel UltraPlay 96-in Rectangle Picnic Table Rectangle Picnic Table Rectangle Picnic Table Yellow Pine Rec Table

Add to Cart Add to Cart Add to Cart Add

RELATED ITEMS Feedback

$1,626.27 $1,613.90 $1,829.71 $1,570.11

1 1 0 1

UltraPlay 46-in Blue Steel Round UltraPlay 96-in Silver Extruded UltraPlay 46-in Green Steel UltraPlay 96-in

Picnic Table Aluminum Rectangle Picnic Table Round Picnic Table PacketRectangle page 122 ofPicnic 126 Add to Cart Add to Cart Add to Cart Add

PREVIOUSLY VIEWED

$1,570.11 $1,384.52 Feedback

1 0

UltraPlay 96-in Black Steel Ultra Play 72"L Blue Rectangular Rectangle Picnic Table Picnic Table with Benches

Add to Cart Add to Cart

Packet page 123 of 126 RELATED SEARCHES

Ultraplay Picnic Tables Rectangle Picnic Tables Commercial Residential Picnic Tables B

Back to Top

Deals, Inspiration and

Trends email address ZIP code Sign Up We’ve got ideas to share. Enter your email and ZIP code.

Need Help? Order Status

Lowe's Credit Cards Gift Cards Feedback

Installation Services Lowe's Apps

ABOUT LOWE'S

STORES & SERVICES

CUSTOMER SERVICE

PRIVACY & USE

CONNECT WITH US

Packet page 124 of 126 © 2021 Lowe's. All rights reserved. Lowe's and the Gable Mansard Design are registered trademarks of LF, LLC. Feedback

Packet page 125 of 126 Action Item #21-02-49 February 18, 2021 First and Final Reading

PLYMOUTH-CANTON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS Plymouth, Michigan

TO: Members of the Board of Education

FROM: Monica L. Merritt, Superintendent

DATE: February 23, 2021

RE: MASB Region 8 Board of Directors Election (First and Final Reading)

Recommended Resolution

It was moved by Member ______and seconded by Member ______to designate Diane Robertson, Executive Secretary to the Superintendent, to cast a vote on behalf of the Board for ______to represent Region 8 for a three-year term on the Michigan Association of School Boards (MASB) Board of Directors.

Ayes: ______

Nays: ______

The Motion was ______

Packet page 126 of 126