DOCSLIB.ORG

Propriety and Peerages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Propriety and Peerages House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Propriety and Peerages Second Report of Session 2007–08 Report and Annex, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 11 December 2007 HC 153 Published on 18 December 2007 [Incorporating HC 1049-i-iv, Session 2006–07] By authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Administration Select Committee The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, of the Health Service Commissioners for England, Scotland and Wales and of the Parliamentary Ombudsman for Northern Ireland, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Dr Tony Wright MP (Labour, Cannock Chase) (Chairman) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield Southgate) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Mr Ian Liddell-Grainger MP (Conservative, Bridgewater) Julie Morgan MP (Labour, Cardiff North) Mr Gordon Prentice MP (Labour, Pendle) Paul Rowen MP (Liberal Democrats, Rochdale) Mr Charles Walker MP (Conservative, Broxbourne) Jenny Willott MP (Liberal Democrats, Cardiff Central) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/pasc. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Steven Mark (Clerk), James Gerard (Second Clerk), Louise Glen (Committee Assistant), Anne Woolhouse (Secretary) and James Bowman (Senior Office Clerk). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Public Administration Select Committee, Committee Office, First Floor, 7 Millbank, House of Commons, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 3284; the Committee’s email address is pubadmincom@parliament.uk. Public Administration Select Committee: Propriety and Peerages 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 Background 5 Scope of the inquiry 7 2 Summary of recent events 9 3 Honours and peerages 12 The Honours system 12 Scope for patronage 13 Appointments to the House of Lords 14 The appointment of working peers 14 Honours and peerages: a comparison 15 Conclusions 16 4 The legal framework 18 The CPS decision and the 1925 Act 18 The evidential test for prosecution 19 An impossible test to pass? 21 The decision to investigate 21 Historical and hypothetical prosecutions 23 Refining the 1925 Act 25 Potential new offences 25 Changing the burden of proof 26 Reforming the general law of corruption 28 Conclusions 29 5 Loans and electoral administration 30 Loan funding 30 A regulatory failure? 31 6 House of Lords appointments 37 House of Lords reform: how we got to where we are 37 The House of Lords Appointments Commission 39 The 2005 draft working peers list 39 The powers of the Commission 41 A statutory Appointments Commission 43 7 An interim House of Lords Reform Bill 45 Reforming appointments processes 45 Honours and peerages: breaking the link 45 An exit route 46 Limiting party patronage 48 2 Public Administration Select Committee: Propriety and Peerages Setting out the criteria 48 The role of the statutory Appointments Commission 50 Internal party practices 52 Remaining elements of the Bill 53 8 Concluding thoughts 56 Conclusions and recommendations 58 Annex: advice to the Committee from Christopher Sallon QC 64 Witnesses 85 List of written evidence 86 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 87 Public Administration Select Committee: Propriety and Peerages 3 Summary This report into questions of propriety in the awarding of honours and peerages was much delayed by a lengthy police investigation. We paused our inquiry in March 2006 because we did not wish to risk prejudicing any criminal trial. Once it became apparent, however, that there would be no such trial, we have hastened to complete our inquiry and publish our findings as quickly as possible. We have been clear throughout our inquiry that our business was not to re-run the police inquiry or to judge the performance of the police. Our aim has been to examine the systems designed to ensure propriety and recommend improvements to those systems. The public impression of covert patronage created by the ‘cash for honours’ affair is at odds with a system that is, on the face of it, more transparent than ever before, thanks to recent measures to improve the regulation of party funding and of appointments to the House of Lords. More has been done since. Central to the affair was the regrettable loophole in the law which did not require parties to declare loans that were received on commercial terms, without adequately defining what those terms were. The passage of the Electoral Administration Act 2006 has closed this loophole. However, the spirit of the law on loan funding was very clear. If all parties had acted in that spirit, many of the subsequent difficulties could have been avoided. A package of reforms is needed. Proposals relating to party funding are already being considered by the Government, hopefully in conjunction with other parties. The Electoral Commission’s role is to be refocused on enforcement of standards. Our proposals complete the package. The Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act was severely tested by the police investigation. In our view, its scope remains appropriate, even if the behaviour it criminalises is inherently difficult to prove to the necessary standard. In the longer term, we hope that these offences can be incorporated into a more general law on public sector corruption, a modern version of which is long overdue. However, while the ability successfully to prosecute offences is essential, an effective system would act to prevent corrupt behaviour in the first place. The core of this matter is party leaders’ powers of patronage. Political patronage has been effectively removed from the honours system; its scope should also be greatly reduced in the awarding of peerages. This would, at a stroke, remove much of the room for abuse in the alleged link between donations and peerages. Our main proposal is for an immediate House of Lords reform measure, clearly defined in scale and scope. Its primary purpose would be to put the independent House of Lords Appointments Commission onto a statutory footing, and empower it to take decisions on the size, balance and composition of the House against agreed and explicit criteria. A mechanism is also needed for peers to resign from the House—or, in some circumstances, 4 Public Administration Select Committee: Propriety and Peerages to be compelled to leave. Although these proposals ought to be, and some need to be, set out in legislation, the Government should not wait where it does not have to. The Government could implement immediately our proposal for new peers to be chosen by the Appointments Commission rather than by political parties. Under our proposals, the Commission would choose candidates from “long lists” provided and published by the parties, with the qualifications of nominees made public. The methods used by the parties to choose candidates to put on those long lists would be for the parties themselves to decide, but we suggest that more transparent arrangements will be more likely to command public confidence. Lastly, the report argues that the link between the honours system and the award of seats in the legislature—already significantly weakened—should be broken for good. Honours and titles should be for past service; a seat in Parliament for potential future service. Our recommendations build on principles to which the major parties have already signed up. We hope that the experience of the last two years will provide the impetus to make them happen, and with a proper urgency. Public Administration Select Committee: Propriety and Peerages 5 1 Introduction Background 1. This Committee has a longstanding interest in the administration of the honours system, the award of peerages and standards of conduct in public life. In 2004 our predecessor committee conducted a major inquiry into the honours system.1 In 2005, we embarked on a wider inquiry into the entire field of ethics and standards in public life.2 Subsequently on 14 March 2006, partly in response to allegations concerning the possible offer of peerages in exchange for financial assistance to political parties, we announced that, as part of our inquiry into ethics and standards, we would investigate whether the system of scrutiny for propriety of honours and peerages for political service was satisfactory. 2. Following the subsequent announcement by the Metropolitan Police that they were to conduct a criminal investigation into the allegations, we met privately with representatives of the police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). They advised us of their concerns that our inquiry, if conducted wholly in public, might prejudice their investigations. Having taken legal advice, we agreed to a “short pause” in our inquiry, writing: The matters alleged go to the heart of the political and parliamentary process, and we think it vital that Parliament should investigate as soon as possible. The sub judice rule does not apply in this case. No criminal charges have yet been made. We have discussed the implications of continuing a high profile inquiry for future court proceedings with the police and Speaker's Counsel. In the light of advice, we have decided to have a short pause in our inquiry, of no more than a matter of weeks, to allow the police to tell us whether there is a realistic prospect of charges being brought.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Education Committee Recruitment Candidate Pack
    Independent Member Honours Independent Committee CANDIDATE INFORMATION PACK Closing date for this post is: Friday 16 July 2021 Applications should be sent to: honoursrecruitment@cabinetoffice.gov.uk Prime Minister's strategic priorities for the honours system The work of the independent honours committees is guided by the Prime Minister’s priorities. Mr Johnson reaffirmed that honours should be awarded ‘merit first’ – to those who give service above and beyond – and not to those who are just doing their job. Honours are not to reward longevity in a role, seniority or age. In supporting the Government’s levelling up agenda, the Prime Minister would like to see representation from the length and breadth of the UK, reflecting the extraordinary contributions made across every part of this country, with a real focus in recognising parts of the country often overlooked. In awarding honours, the Prime Minister would like to see individuals who have provided outstanding service with clear and specific examples of how their results have delivered real change to people’s lives or had a positive impact on the country. Individuals must represent values which reflect the UK and recognise the exceptional role the UK plays in the world. He would like to see the system especially recognise those: ● innovators and entrepreneurs who create thriving businesses and deliver growth across the country and export to new markets ● individuals who are unleashing our potential in emerging sectors, striving to find new technologies, deliver a cleaner environment
    [Show full text]
  • {TEXTBOOK} Honours Knight
    HONOURS KNIGHT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Rachel Bach | 384 pages | 25 Feb 2014 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9780356502366 | English | London, United Kingdom Honor's Knight (Paradox, #2) by Rachel Bach As a knight, you can be at times fixated on image and how you appear to other people. You want to look good and to impress other people with your actions. How you are perceived is important to you. You feel shame if you are unable to hold yourself to agreements and to maintain the principles that are important. Under stress, you can feel set aside or low in status and worth. You can feel that other people do not listen to or will not respect you despite your sacrifices. Random drop from Greatsword-wielding Black Knights. Black Knight Halberd. Random drop from Halberd-wielding Black Knights. Black Knight Shield. Random drop from any Black Knight. Black Knight Sword. Random drop from any Sword-Wielding Black Knight. Rare random drop from Channelers. Three respawning channelers can be found in The Duke's Archives. Found in the Undead Asylum revisited. Acquired as drop from the now hollow Oscar who first gave you the Estus Flask. Acquired by killing Patches , or it can be purchased from him when he moves to Firelink Shrine. Demon's Spear. Rare random drop from the giant gold knights in Anor Londo whilst sunlit. It can more easily be purchased from the Giant Blacksmith for souls. He will invade you in The Tomb of Giants just before Nito's domain, down near the area that overlooks the distant Ash Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • India in the UK: the Diaspora Effect
    India in the UK: The diaspora effect Celebrating the energy and entrepreneurship of the Indian diaspora in the UK February 2020 Contents Section Page About our research 03 Foreword 04 Introduction 06 India in the UK: the story so far 09 Our key findings 13 Biggest Indian diaspora employers 18 Five priorities for even faster growth 20 Conclusion: writing the next chapter 22 About Grant Thornton and FICCI 23 About our research This report, produced in collaboration with the High Commission of India in the UK and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FICCI), aims to highlight the enormous contribution of the Indian diaspora living in the UK, across all walks of life. The report provides key findings on the economic Taking into account these last names we researched contribution of Indian diaspora-owned UK businesses based available databases to identify companies that are on their latest published accounts. It also identifies the top majority owned by the Indian diaspora, with at least one Indian diaspora employers – those companies that employ director of presumed Indian origin living in the UK. We more than 1,000 people in the UK. then researched these individuals, via publicly available information, to further assess their cultural origins and Because of inherent difficulties in identifying ownership ethnic backgrounds. In addition, we also used our own by ethnicity and given there is no single record of UK market intelligence and knowledge of Indian diaspora- companies owned by the Indian diaspora, our research owned companies to supplement the selection. relies on the accuracy of the data available to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Dame Lucy Neville-Rolfe DBE, CMG, FCIS Biography ______
    Dame Lucy Neville-Rolfe DBE, CMG, FCIS Biography ___________________________________________________________________________ Non-Executive President of Eurocommerce since July 2012, Lucy Neville-Rolfe began her retail career in 1997 when she joined Tesco as Group Director of Corporate Affairs. She went on to also become Company Secretary (2004-2006) before being appointed to the Tesco plc Board where she was Executive Director (Corporate and Legal Affairs) from 2006 to January 2013. Lucy is a life peer and became a member of the UK House of Lords on 29 October 2013. Before Tesco she worked in a number of UK Government departments, starting with the then Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, where she was private secretary to the Minister. She was a member of the UK Prime Minister’s Policy Unit from 1992 – 1994 where her responsibilities included home and legal affairs. She later became Director of the Deregulation Unit, first in the DTI and then the Cabinet Office from 1995 - 1997. In 2013 Lady Neville-Rolfe was elected to the Supervisory Board of METRO AG. She is also a member of the UK India Business Advisory Council. She is a Non-Executive Director of ITV plc, and of 2 Sisters Food Group, a member of the PWC Advisory Board and a Governor of the London Business School. She is a former Vice– President of Eurocommerce and former Deputy Chairman of the British Retail Consortium In 2012 she was made a DBE (Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire) in the Queen’s Birthday Honours in recognition of her services to industry and the voluntary sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords Library Note: the Life Peerages Act 1958
    The Life Peerages Act 1958 This year sees the 50th anniversary of the passing of the Life Peerages Act 1958 on 30 April. The Act for the first time enabled life peerages, with a seat and vote in the House of Lords, to be granted for other than judicial purposes, and to both men and women. This Library Note describes the historical background to the Act and looks at its passage through both Houses of Parliament. It also considers the discussions in relation to the inclusion of women life peers in the House of Lords. Glenn Dymond 21st April 2008 LLN 2008/011 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to victoryi@parliament.uk. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Life peerages – an historical overview .......................................................................... 2 2.1 Hereditary nature of peerage................................................................................... 2 2.2 Women not summoned to Parliament ..................................................................... 2 2.3 Early life peerages..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Warriors Walk Heritage Trail Wellington City Council
    crematoriumchapel RANCE COLUMBARIUM WALL ROSEHAUGH AVENUE SE AFORTH TERRACE Wellington City Council Introduction Karori Cemetery Servicemen’s Section Karori Serviceman’s Cemetery was established in 1916 by the Wellington City Council, the fi rst and largest such cemetery to be established in New Zealand. Other local councils followed suit, setting aside specifi c areas so that each of the dead would be commemorated individually, the memorial would be permanent and uniform, and there would be no distinction made on the basis of military or civil rank, race or creed. Unlike other countries, interment is not restricted to those who died on active service but is open to all war veterans. First contingent leaving Karori for the South African War in 1899. (ATL F-0915-1/4-MNZ) 1 wellington’s warriors walk heritage trail Wellington City Council The Impact of Wars on New Zealand New Zealanders Killed in Action The fi rst major external confl ict in which New Zealand was South African War 1899–1902 230 involved was the South African War, when New Zealand forces World War I 1914–1918 18,166 fought alongside British troops in South Africa between 1899 and 1902. World War II 1939–1945 11,625 In the fi rst decades of the 20th century, the majority of New Zealanders Died in Operational New Zealand’s population of about one million was of British descent. They identifi ed themselves as Britons and spoke of Services Britain as the ‘Motherland’ or ‘Home’. Korean War 1950–1953 43 New Zealand sent an expeditionary force to the aid of the Malaya/Malaysia 1948–1966 20 ‘Mother Country’ at the outbreak of war on 4 August 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • The History Journal Volume 14
    annual service of rededication Order of St John St Hohn Historyenduring faith Awkward Hours, Awkward Jobs Capitular Procession of the Priory in Australia Christ Church Anglican Cathedral Frank Dunstan MStJ Darwin Historical Society of Australia annual service of rededication Order of St John St Hohn Historyenduring faith THE JOURNAL OF THE ST JOHN AMBULANCE HISTORICALCapitular SOCIETY Procession OF AUSTRALIA of the Priory in Australia Christ ChurchVOLUME Anglican 14, 2014 Cathedral ‘Preserving and promoting the St John heritage’ Historical Society of Australia Darwin Frank Dunstan MStJ Awkward Hours, Awkward Jobs The front cover of St John History Volume 14 shows the members of the Order of St John who took part in the Capitular Procession of the Priory in Australia at their annual service of rededication in Christ Church Capitular Procession of the Priory in Australia Anglican Cathedral in Darwin on Sunday 2 June 2013. enduring faith The members of the Order are pictured outside the porch of the cathedral, which is all that remains of the original structure built and consecrated in 1902. Constructed from the local red limestone, the original Christ Church Anglican Cathedral cathedral was damaged during a Japanese air raid in February 1942. After that the Australian military forces annual service of rededication used the building until the end of the war. Cyclone Tracy destroyed everything but the porch of the repaired cathedral in December 1974. Order of St John The new cathedral, built around and behind the porch, was consecrated in the presence of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Reverend Donald Coggan, on 13 March 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Monday 20 May 2013 Votes and Proceedings
    No. 8 41 House of Commons Monday 20 May 2013 Votes and Proceedings The House met at 2.30 pm. PRAYERS. 1 Speaker’s Statement: Search of a Member’s office 2 Questions to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 3 Statement: Syria (Secretary William Hague) 4 Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill (Programme) (No. 2) Ordered, That the Order of 5 February 2013 (Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill (Programme)) be varied as follows: (1) Paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the Order shall be omitted. (2) Proceedings on Consideration and Third Reading shall be taken in two days in accordance with the following provisions of this Order. (3) Proceedings on Consideration shall be taken on the days shown in the first column of the following Table and in the order so shown. (4) Proceedings on Consideration shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the times specified in the second column of the Table. Table Proceedings Time for conclusion of proceedings First day New Clauses relating to any of the following: 7.00pm (a) sex education, (b) conscientious or other objection to marriage of same sex couples, (c) equality law, (d) religious organisations’ opt-in to marriage of same sex couples, and (e) protection against compulsion to solemnize marriages of same sex couples or to carry out activities in relation to the solemnization of such marriages amendments to Clause 2 other than amendments to the definition of ‘relevant marriage’ in subsection (4), amendments to Clause 8, and amendments to Schedule 7 relating to section 403 of the Education Act 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman 1 FOI Request: FDN
    Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman FOI Request: FDN 219443 Des Moore The number of MP referrals received in March 2015, broken down by MP: Referred MP cases Amber Rudd MP 1 Anas Sarwar MP 1 Andrea Leadsom MP 2 Angela Smith MP 1 Caroline Dinenage MP 2 Catherine McKinnell MP 1 Chris Evans MP 1 Chris Kelly MP 1 Christopher Heaton-Harris MP 2 Claire Perry MP 1 Conor Burns MP 1 David Mundell MP 2 David Winnick MP 1 Dominic Raab MP 1 Dr Daniel Poulter MP 1 Dr Liam Fox MP 1 Dr Phillip Lee MP 1 Dr Sarah Wollaston MP 1 Dr Vincent Cable MP 1 Duncan Hames MP 1 Eilidh Whiteford MP 1 Elizabeth Truss MP 1 Esther McVey MP 1 Fiona Bruce MP 1 Gavin Barwell MP 1 Gavin Shuker MP 1 Geraint Davies MP 1 Glyn Davies MP 1 Gordon Henderson MP 1 Helen Jones MP 1 Hugh Robertson MP 1 Ian Paisley Jnr MP 1 Jackie Doyle-Price MP 1 Jeremy Lefroy MP 3 Jessica Lee MP 1 Jim Dowd MP 2 Joan Ruddock MP 3 John Cryer MP 1 John McDonnell MP 3 Jonathan Edwards MP 1 1 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Jonathan Evans MP 1 Jonathan Lord MP 1 Julie Elliott MP 1 Julie Hilling MP 1 Karl Turner MP 1 Kate Green MP 1 Kevin Brennan MP 1 Lilian Greenwood MP 1 Liz Kendall MP 1 Marcus Jones MP 1 Mark Pawsey MP 1 Mark Spencer MP 1 Mark Tami MP 1 Matt Hancock MP 3 Michael Fabricant MP 2 Mike Crockart MP 2 Mr Adam Afriyie MP 2 Mr Adrian Sanders MP 4 Mr Andrew Miller MP 1 Mr Andrew Rosindell MP 1 Mr Andrew Selous MP 1 Mr Andrew Turner MP 3 Mr Andrew Tyrie MP 1 Mr Andy Love MP 3 Mr Andy McDonald MP 1 Mr Austin Mitchell MP 1 Mr Barry Gardiner MP 3 Mr Barry Sheerman MP 2 Mr Bernard
    [Show full text]
  • Boris Johnson
    DEC-01/08 REPORT OF AN INVESTIGATION BORIS JOHNSON MAYOR OF LONDON CHAIRMAN, METROPOLITAN POLICE AUTHORITY BY JONATHAN GOOLDEN, BA(LAW) SOLICITOR 24th February 2009 SCHEDULE OF EVIDENCE jonathan goolden SOLICITORS PO Box 117 Louth LN11 0WW Tel 0845 370 3117 Fax 0845 370 3118 info@goolden.co.uk www.goolden.co.uk regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority 1 This page is intentionally blank 2 Schedule of evidence Page Number Description 5 JTG 1 Letter dated 5th December 2008 from Len Duvall to Fiona Ledden, GLA – complaints against Boris Johnson 8 JTG 2 Biography of Boris Johnson 9 JTG 3 Home Secretary’s statement to the House of Commons on Home Office leaks 28 JTG 4 Times article – 29th November 2008 29 JTG 5 Transcript of London Assembly Plenary – 3rd December 2008 47 JTG 6 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee press announcement of inquiry into policing process of Home Office leak inquiries – 11th December 2008 48 JTG 7 Home Affairs Committee – uncorrected transcript of oral evidence – Rt. Hon. Jacqui Smith MP and Sir David Normington – 20th January 2009 75 JTG 8 Home Affairs Committee – uncorrected transcript of oral evidence – Mr. Boris Johnson – 3rd February 2009 88 JTG 9 Home Affairs Committee – uncorrected transcript of oral evidence – AC Robert Quick – 10th February 2009 120 JTG 10 Statement of Len Duvall – 11th February 2009 3 123 JTG 11 Statement of Catherine Crawford – 13th February 2009 127 JTG 12 First Statement of Guto Harri – 10th February 2009 135 JTG 13 Statement of Sir Paul Stephenson – received 19th February 2009
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election
    June 2015 Intelligence for a multi-ethnic Britain Diversity and Democracy: Race and the 2015 General Election Summary Table 1. Top 15 Labour vote share increases in diverse seats, 2015 • In 2015, Labour remained the first preference for most Labour Minority Black and minority ethnic voters, with around 60% choosing Constituency increase population Labour. The Conservatives have increased their vote share Birmingham, Hall Green 26.9% 64% significantly, from around 16% in 2010 to over 25% in 2015 Brent Central* 20.9% 61% • The Liberal Democrats got around 5% of the BME vote, and Poplar and Limehouse 18.6% 57% the Greens less. Only 2% of BME voters chose UKIP Bethnal Green and Bow 18.3% 53% • There is increasing variation in how different ethnic minority Birmingham, Ladywood 18.0% 73% groups vote, as well as regional differences Walthamstow 17.0% 53% • There are now 41 BME MPs, a significant rise, suggesting a Manchester, Gorton 17.0% 48% future BME Prime Minister could now be sitting in Parliament Birmingham, Hodge Hill 16.4% 64% • The success of Britain’s democracy depends not only on BME Leyton and Wanstead 15.0% 51% voter participation and representation, but on policymakers Ilford South 14.6% 76% responding to ethnic inequalities Leicester South 14.2% 51% Bradford East 13.8% 47% Introduction Bermondsey and Old Southwark* 13.8% 42% The 2015 General Election saw the Conservative Prime Ealing Southall 13.5% 70% Minister David Cameron returned with his party’s first overall Ealing Central and Acton* 13.1% 37% majority since John Major’s win in 1992.
    [Show full text]