2040 Centers Transportation Strategies & Mode Split Targets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2040 Centers Transportation Strategies & Mode Split Targets 2040 Centers Transportation Strategies & Mode Split Targets Project Final Report 2040 Centers Transportation Strategies & Mode Split Targets Project Final Report Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction PDF document ● Project Description ● Policy Context Chapter 2: Project Methodology PDF document ● Introduction ● Defining Study Areas ● Travel Analysis ● Data Collection ● Descriptors ● Economic Analysis ● Case Studies Chapter 3: Assessing the Centers PDF document ● Introduction ● Hillsdale Town Center ● St. Johns Town Center ● West Portland Town Center ● 60th Station Community ● 82nd Station Community ● 122nd Station Community ● 148th Station Community ● Overview of Assessment Findings Chapter 4: Mode Split Targets and Implementation Strategies PDF document ● Introduction ● Recommended Mode Split Targets ● Implementation Strategies ● Link to the Transportation System Plan Appendix A: Study Area Travel Data Appendix B: Land Use Inventory Data Collection Form Appendix C : Descriptor Background Report file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/rbear/My%20Documents/index.cfm.htm (1 of 4) [5/21/2009 1:46:45 PM] 2040 Centers Transportation Strategies & Mode Split Targets Project Final Report Appendix D: Economic Development Allocation Analysis Appendix E: Existing Conditions Profiles by Study Area List of Figures Chapter 1: Introduction Figure 1-1: Location of Study Areas Chapter 2 Project Methodology Figure 2-1: 105-zone Travel Zone System List of Tables Chapter 1 Introduction Table 1-1: Regional Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle Mode Split Targets Chapter 2: Project Methodology ● Table 2-1: Centers Zone Equivalency ● Table 2-2: Principles for System Development – Preferred Scenario ● Table 2-3: Transportation Analysis Zone Assumptions for the Preferred Scenario ● Table 2-4: 1994 and 2020 Auto Occupancy Rates ● Table 2-5: List of Data and Sources ● Table 2-6: Land Use and Transportation Descriptors ● Table 2-7: Key Commercial Establishments by Category Chapter 3: Assessing the Centers ● Table 3-1: Hillsdale Town Center Descriptor Values ● Table 3-2: Hillsdale Town Center 2020 Housing Assessment ● Table 3-3: Hillsdale Town Center 2020 Employment Assessment ● Table 3-4: Hillsdale Town Center Intersection Density ● Table 3-5: Hillsdale Town Center Comparison of 1999 and 2020 RTP Preferred Transit Network ● Table 3-6: St. Johns Town Center Descriptor Values ● Table 3-7: St. Johns Town Center 2020 Housing Assessment ● Table 3-8: St. Johns Town Center 2020 Employment Assessment ● Table 3-9: St. Johns Town Center Intersection Density ● Table 3-10: St. Johns Town Center Comparison of 1999 and 2020 RTP file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/rbear/My%20Documents/index.cfm.htm (2 of 4) [5/21/2009 1:46:45 PM] 2040 Centers Transportation Strategies & Mode Split Targets Project Final Report Preferred Transit Network ● Table 3-11: West Portland Town Center Descriptor Values ● Table 3-12: West Portland Town Center 2020 Housing Assessment ● Table 3-13: West Portland Town Center 2020 Employment Assessment ● Table 3-14: West Portland Town Center Intersection Density ● Table 3-15: West Portland Town Comparison of 1999 and 2020 RTP Preferred Transit Network ● Table 3-16: 60th Station Community Descriptor Values ● Table 3-17: 60th Station Community 2020 Housing Assessment ● Table 3-18: 60th Station Community 2020 Employment Assessment ● Table 3-19: 60th Station Community Intersection Density ● Table 3-20: 60th Station Community Comparison of 1999 and 2020 RTP Preferred Transit Network ● Table 3-21: 82nd Station Community Descriptor Values ● Table 3-22: 82nd Station Community 2020 Housing Assessment ● Table 3-23: 82nd Station Community 2020 Employment Assessment ● Table 3-24: 82nd Station Community Intersection Density ● Table 3-25: 82nd Station Community Comparison of 1999 and 2020 RTP Preferred Transit Network ● Table 3-26: 122nd Station Community Descriptor Values ● Table 3-27:122nd Station Community 2020 Housing Assessment ● Table 3-28: 122nd Station Community 2020 Employment Assessment ● Table 3-29: 122nd Station Community Intersection Density ● Table 3-30: 122nd Station Community Comparison of 1999 and 2020 RTP Preferred Transit Network ● Table 3-31: 148th Station Community Descriptor Values ● Table 3-32: 148th Station Community 2020 Housing Assessment ● Table 3-33: 148th Station Community 2020 Employment Assessment ● Table 3-34: 148th Station Community Intersection Density ● Table 3-35: 148th Station Community Comparison of 1999 and 2020 RTP Preferred Transit Network Chapter 4: Mode Split Targets and Implementation Strategies ● Table 4-1: Comparison of 1994 and 2020 Non-SOV Mode Split The 2040 Centers Transportation Strategies and Mode Split Target Project has been developed in conjunction with the Transportation System Plan for the City of Portland, Oregon. This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/rbear/My%20Documents/index.cfm.htm (3 of 4) [5/21/2009 1:46:45 PM] 2040 Centers Transportation Strategies & Mode Split Targets Project Final Report Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. This TGM grant is financed by federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act and local government funds. The content of this document does not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. Office of Transportation Charlie Hales, Commissioner Victor F. Rhodes, Director Transportation Planning Steve Dotterrer, Chief Planner Transit Program Stephen Iwata, Program Manager Project Staff Deena Platman, Project Manager Matthew Arnold, Project Assistant Craig Chenoweth, Project Assistant Paul Bender, Project Assistant Hollie Lund, Project Assistant Art Pearce, Project Assistant Mary Edin, Graphics Samy Fouts, Graphics Consultant E.D. Hovee and Company file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/rbear/My%20Documents/index.cfm.htm (4 of 4) [5/21/2009 1:46:45 PM] Chapter 1 Introduction The City of Portland Office of Transportation (PDOT) is currently developing a Transportation System Plan (TSP) to guide the City’s investment in pedestrian, bicycle, transit and street improvements over the next 20 years. The TSP must be consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan, which emphasizes a strong link between transportation and land-use, and must comply with the Clean Air Act by reducing air pollution and the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide a transportation system that is accessible for all users. It is also required by the State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) to reduce vehicle miles traveled and the number of parking spaces per person over a 20-year planning period. An important aspect of this plan is therefore the coordination of transportation investments with land-use and growth management policies in ways that link transportation service to growing areas and provide people with more choices in how they travel. To measure progress towards these goals, the TPR specifies that the TSP use mode split as a measurable objective and set benchmarks that measure progress toward these goals at five-year intervals. Project Description The 2040 Centers Transportation Strategies and Mode Split Targets project aids the TSP by: ¨ Developing a set of quantitative descriptors measuring land use and transportation characteristics associated with increased use of alternative modes; ¨ Setting non-single occupancy vehicle mode split targets1 for selected 2040 town centers and station communities; ¨ Identifying strategies for reducing reliance on single occupancy vehicles in Portland’s town centers and station communities by promoting walking, bicycling, transit use, and carpooling. There are seven areas of study included in the project. Three areas are designated town centers including Hillsdale, St. Johns, and West Portland Town Centers. Four are designated as light rail station communities including 60th, 82nd, 122nd, and 148th Station Areas. Figure 1-1 identifies each study area’s locale in the City of Portland. The project serves as a first step toward implementing the town center and station area concepts in these areas. The objective for this project is to develop a methodology for measuring compliance with Urban Growth Management Functional Plan mode split targets. To accomplish this, the project consists of four components: 1 Non-single occupancy vehicle mode splits combine market share for shared auto, transit, walk, and bicycle person trips for all purposes. 1-1 ¨ Analyzing travel forecast data; ¨ Developing descriptors; ¨ Profiling study areas; ¨ Identifying strategies to improve non-single occupancy vehicle mode splits. Figure 1-1: Location of Study Areas Policy Context The TSP and the Centers project are guided by an elaborate policy context, composed of existing and emerging policy guidelines at the federal, state and regional levels as well as the City’s own planning documents. These guidelines mandate the development of measurable indicators of regional policy goals, with several specific references to 2040 Centers. The characteristics of centers are also key elements, 1-2 implicitly and explicitly, of the community plans that comprise the City of Portland’s Comprehensive Plan. At the broadest level, the federal Transportation Equity Act for the Twenty-first Century (TEA-21) of 1998 recognizes the importance of planning for and encouraging the use of alternative transportation modes. TEA-21 requires the consideration of alternative transportation modes in the development
Recommended publications
  • Downloads.Gigl.Org.Uk/Website/Parks People and Nature1.Pdf 8 Flores, T
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michelle Lee Talal for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science presented on May 7, 2019 Title: Exploring Urban Parks: Plant Communities, Visitor Experiences, and Manager Perspectives in Portland, Oregon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Mary V. Santelmann Urban parks are biodiversity hotspots within cities and have the potential to provide a range of socio-cultural benefits for people, but may not always meet the needs and desires of park visitors. A variety of land use practices and environmental factors affect urban park biodiversity and vegetation structure, composition, and ecological function, but more studies are needed to compare plant taxonomic composition, biodiversity patterns, and species traits across different types of urban green spaces. Additionally, there is a lack of research that explores park user experiences, vegetation perceptions, and accessibility issues in a range of urban park types interspersed throughout Portland using qualitative methods to observe and interview visitors on-site. More research is also needed that focuses on interviewing park managers about their perspectives on park benefits and management. The findings of my interdisciplinary dissertation may assist managers in their aims to achieve various ecological goals, as well as meet the needs and desires of park visitors within increasingly developed urban areas. The purpose of this research is three-fold, and includes examining: 1) The relationships between plant community composition, biodiversity patterns, environmental variables, and species traits in a range of urban parks in Portland, Oregon; 2) how the vegetation in these urban parks currently meets the needs and desires of visitors; and 3) how park managers currently manage vegetation in the parks to meet the needs and desires of visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the River 2006-07
    State of the River 2006–07 iver Renaissance is the City of Portland’s initiative to reclaim the Willamette River as a community centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the Columbia River. The Willamette is the heart of Portland’s landscape, history, and culture. The Columbia is our economic and ecologic lifeline to the Pacific. River Renaissance Rpromotes and celebrates these waters as living emblems of Portland’s identity. Portland lives its river values every day in ways big and small. Together these actions are reconnecting citizens and businesses with a healthier river. The State of the River Report profiles yearly accomplishments and identifi es future actions needed to assure a clean and healthy river, a prosperous harbor, and vibrant riverfronts. Just a few of the actions detailed in this report are illustrated on this page to give some idea of how deeply Portland believes in caring for—and being cared for by—our rivers. 2006–07 State of the River Report Contents River Renaissance is a Leadership . 2 community-wide initiative to Message from the River Renaissance Directors . 3 reclaim the Willamette River Introduction . 4 as Portland’s centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the How the City that Works Works on the River . 5 Columbia River. The initiative Accomplishments and Key Actions . 7 promotes and celebrates Portland’s Progress Measures . 23 waters as our chief environmental, 2007–2008 Action Agenda . 35 economic and urban asset. Up and Down the Willamette . 55 Partners . 61 Recommended Readings . 63 The 2006–07 State of the River Report summarizes the achievements made by the City of Portland and a network of community partners to revitalize our rivers and identifies next steps needed to continue progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Fanno Creek Greenway Action Plan Section I
    FANNO CREEK GREENWAY TRAIL ACTION PLAN January 2003 Prepared for: Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces Department Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design METRO COUNCIL FANNO CREEK GREENWAY TRAIL ACTION PLAN WORKING GROUP MEMBERS David Bragdon, President Rex Burkholder Commissioner Dick Schouten, Washington County Carl Hostica Joanne Rice, Washington County Land Use and Transportation Susan McLain Aisha Willits, Washington County Land Use and Transportation Rod Monroe Anna Zirker, Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District Brian Newman Margaret Middleton, City of Beaverton Transportation Rod Park Roel Lundquist, City of Durham Administrator Duane Roberts, City of Tigard Community Development METRO AUDITOR Justin Patterson, City of Tualatin Parks Jim Sjulin, Portland Parks and Recreation Alexis Dow, CPA Gregg Everhart, Portland Parks and Recreation Courtney Duke, Portland Transportation METRO REGIONAL PARKS AND GREENSPACES DEPARTMENT Don Baack, SWTrails Group of Southwest Neighborhoods, Inc. Bob Bothman, 40-Mile Loop Land Trust Jim Desmond, Director Dave Drescher, Fans of Fanno Creek Heather Kent, Planning and Education Division Manager Sue Abbott, National Park Service Rivers and Trails Program Heather Kent, Metro Planning and Education Division ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN William Eadie, Metro Open Spaces Acquisition Division Bill Barber, Metro Planning George Hudson, Principal Arif Khan, Senior Planner Daniel Lerch, Assistant Planner PROJECT MANAGER Mel Huie, Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces Department For more information or copies of this report, contact: Mel Huie, Regional Trails Coordinator (503) 797-1731, [email protected] Metro Regional Services Alta Planning + Design 600 NE Grand Ave. 144 NE 28th Ave. Portland, OR 97232 Portland, OR 97232 (503) 797-1700 (503) 230-9862 www.metro-region.org www.altaplanning.com FANNO CREEK GREENWAY TRAIL ACTION PLAN Contents I.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout TRAIL Mapupdated 5/06
    Forestry Center Wildwood Trail Marquam Nature Park Oregon Zoo N Distances: 2 Wildwood Trail/Forestry Center to Willamette Park 7.0 miles 6 Sunset Hwy. Wildwood Trail/Forestry Center to Council Crest 1.8 miles Trail Map Broadway ED Council Crest to Marquam Shelter 1.7 miles G E W n O tto O D Marquam Shelter to Terwilliger Trailhead 1.7 miles a Bro P adway Dr. Information available Humphrey Terwilliger Trailhead to Himes Park Trailhead 1.1 miles Trail Marquam Shelter ay MNP Trailhead Ta nw Marquam Shelter to Fairmount 1.0 miles Stream lb e o e t r . G r 40 MILE LOOP 40 Mile Loop Marquam Shelter to Broadway Drive .6 mile Road Sherwo od D Nature Loop Trail 1.2 miles Road (major) Willamette River OHSU OHSU to Marquam Shelter via Connor Trail .6 mile Parking available Portland Parks and Recreation land Fairm Gibbs oun t . Council Crest Park d R l il H m ua Broadway Drive rq a Elev. 640 ft. M A B ENLARGED VIEW OHSU RO DWA r MNP B Y D o Natural R. ad w OF AREA Area a y Tr. IN RECTANGLE Terwilliger Trailhead D R ED N G Elev. 530 ft. O E T Keller Woodland Preserve T W Tr. ay A ide w P ys ure Loop Three Rivers Conservancy O n . / Nat n r Tr . O D te BR DR I-5 Free l p O u he ADWAY D S S Marquam Park o O Elev. 585 ft. o Shelter O L e W r Elev.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
    [Show full text]
  • Homelessness/Urban Camping Impact Reduction Update
    Greetings- This week, we received 463 new campsite reports identifying roughly 105 campsites throughout the City. Of these new reports, 96 were of people living in vehicles. Additionally, 152 of the reports we received this week were reports of camping on Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) properties and rights- of-way, 7 were of camping on Union Pacific or BNSF rights-of-way, and 16 were regarding camping on private properties. Please note, in the event of a Severe Winter Weather Declaration, the City will not require people to move during campsite cleanups. Sites that have been posted will be cleared of any trash and/or bio-hazard material during the severe weather, but occupants will not be required to move until the Severe Winter Weather Declaration has been lifted. Sites that have been posted but not completely cleaned due to the weather, will be reposted and cleaned in the coming weeks. Severe Weather criteria: The Joint Office, as well as Multnomah County and Portland Emergency Management, use the following criteria to determine when conditions pose a danger to exposed vulnerable people. Any one of the criteria below will result in a Severe Weather Notice if the conditions are forecasted to persist for four (4) hours or more during what would be severe weather shelter operating hours (8pm-7am): 1. Forecasted temperature of 25° F (-3.9° C) or below. 2. Forecasted snow accumulations of 1.0 inch or more sticking to the ground in most locations. 3. Forecasted temperature at or below 32° F (0° C) with driving rain of 1.0 inch or more overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • SW Corridor Plan
    GREAT PLACES SW Corridor Plan Steering committee recommendation | Attachment A Roadway, active transportation, parks, trails and natural resources projects map book and project lists July 22, 2013 Map tiles 2 Roadway and active transportation list 9 Parks, trails and natural resources list 12 Maps are included for location purposes only. 2 Roadway, Active Transportation, and Green Projects – Section 1 E BURNSIDE ST D R E SW WASHINGTON ST ID S R N W BU YON R SW ALDER ST AN D C W S SW JE D FFER V S L ON S SW COLUMBIAT ST B R SW BROADWAY J G N I K R SW MADISON ST E H SW CLAY ST T SW 13TH AVE U SW MARKET ST L N E SW 12TH AVE I V T A R A A M T S Central City PSU E I S V W S R D R O B E Y R E V A V W A A K H H P D W T R 4 O S 3 T I W E A S S SEGRAND AVE 6022 N W S 3093 6022 REY SW PH B HUM L V 6022 D 6022 6022 PDX-17 SW 6TH AVE S W BR 2028 OADWAY DR SW ARTHUR ST PDX-1 PDX-203 SW T 4002 E 2007 D R R W N I O L T T L I A G P 3094 2025 W E S R B L 1044 V 3038 D SW BARBUR BLVD PDX-19 1013 2999 2069 OHSU SOWA 5013 D R OHSU K 2012 C U T PDX-15 T A H S W S Hamilton PDX-10 Bicycle Commercial/ ! !k Fish Projects Urban Growth 1,000500 0 1,000 Industrial ( Essential ! Bike/Ped ") Natural Resource Boundary ! AT Trail Park/ Employment ( Priority Feet ^_ Parks ! Natural Resource Key Type ! Pedestrian Mixed Use Opportunity #* Places ( ! Auto/ Freight Stormwater Categories Higher Intensity Projects Projects by ´ #0 Neighborhood SW Corridor July 15, 2013 ! Multimodal Trails Development Residential ( Roadway, Active Transportation, and Green Projects – Section
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Valley Conservation Study: Nature-Based Recreation and Educational Opportunities and Underserved Areas Assessment
    Willamette Valley Conservation Study: Nature-based Recreation and Educational Opportunities and Underserved Areas Assessment Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants February 2013 WILLAMETTE VALLEY CONSERVATION STUDY: NATURE- BASED RECREATION AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND UNDERSERVED AREAS ASSESSMENT Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region 911 NE 11th Ave Portland, Oregon 97232 503.872.2700 Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 1220 SW Morrison Street, Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97205 503.224.0333 www.swca.com February 25, 2012 Willamette Valley Conservation Study: Nature-based Recreation and Educational Opportunities and Underserved Areas Assessment CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Methods .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1. Spatial Mapping and Data Attributes ............................................................................................ 3 2.2. Document Review ......................................................................................................................... 4 3. Existing and Proposed Nature-Based Recreation and Educational Opportunities ....... 5 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • AUDUBON SOCIETY of PORTLAND
    AUDUBON SOCIETY of PORTLAND JANUARY 2008 Volume 72 Number 1 Warbler Urban Ecology and Join Our Master Sauvie Island In this issue... Conservation Symposium Birder Program Raptor Road Trip! See page 5 See page 7 See page 3 Varied Thrush © Jim Cruce Short-eared Owl © Jim Cruce Willow Flycatcher © Michael McDowell New National Audubon Society WatchList Identifies 11% of the Birds Found in Oregon as At Risk or Critically Imperiled by Bob Sallinger, Conservation Director n the past six months, the National Audubon Society Some Oregon species included in the WatchList, such as Her survival may entirely depend on whether she can find has released two important reports that tell us that the Northern Spotted Owl, Marbled Murrelet, Snowy a safe place to feed and rest in your neighborhood. With a Imany bird species in Oregon and across the United Plover, and Sage Grouse, are already well-known “at-risk” little extra effort, you may even be able to create a place for States are in trouble. These reports speak to the urgency of species. Others such as the Tricolored Blackbird (listed her to stop and nest. many of the Audubon efforts already underway in Oregon as one of the 20 most imperiled species in the United and will help us define new priorities in the coming years. States), Willow Flycatcher, Olive-sided Flycatcher, Audubon’s Bird Agenda: Short-eared Owl, and Varied Thrush can still be found Protecting Birds in the Backyard In June 2007, National Audubon released a report entitled at various times of the year in and around Portland, but are and Beyond Common Birds in Decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Hills Resource Protection Plan
    SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN INVENTORY, ANALYSIS AND REGULATIONS for the PROTECTION OF WETLANDS, WATER BODIES, FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATS, OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL AREAS Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon May 1992 Portland City Council J. E. Bud Clark, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Dick Bogle, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission Martha Peck Andrews, President W. Richard Cooley, Vice President Stan Amy Joan Brown-Kline Estill Deitz Margaret Kirkpatrick Richard Michaelson Chet Orloff Vivian Parker To obtain a large-print version of this document, please call 823-7700 Printed on recycled paper SOUTHWEST HILLS RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN Adopted by City Council January 23, 1992 Effective January 23, 1992 Ordinance No. 165002 Bureau of Planning Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner-In-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Staff Tim Brooks, Project Manager Gail Curtis, City Planner Damian Syrnyk, City Planner Esther Lev, Consulting Biologist Kria Lacher, Planning Assistant Dick Reynolds, Planning Assistant Project Assistance Duncan Brown, Senior Planner Cary Pinard, Senior Planner Chuck Beasley, Volunteer Jim Cronan, Volunteer Betty Woerner, Volunteer Geoff Sauncy, Graphic Illustrator May 1992 Table of Contents Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................page
    [Show full text]
  • Council Crest History-MM Jan 2016.Pdf
    Council Crest History - Michael Munk January 2016 (final draft) Naming and Settling Council Crest Author's note: The 68-year tenure of the Munk family in the oldest house on Council Crest is coming to an end. In view of that I set out to briefly explore history of our house and its previous occupants but, my curiosity engaged and encouraged by Jim Breithaupt and the SW Hills Residential League, I reoriented my project toward the early history of the neighborhood. One thing led to another...and now we have "Naming and Settling Council Crest." The Munk family-- my parents, younger sister and I--fled Europe and first came to Portland in 1939. After spending WW II in Berkeley, California and Washington, D.C., we returned to Portland in 1947 when I was 12 and moved into what I did not know until writing this article is the earliest surviving house on Council Crest. I spent most of my adult life in the East, and my sister moved away to college and marriage, but our parents continued to live in the house for the rest of their long lives. I took over in 2000--after my retirement and my parents' deaths. The Friends of Marquam Nature Park--founded in 1968 in my mother's dining room-- placed two memorial benches facing Mt Hood in Council Crest Park to honor my parents' role in protecting the mainly wild area from a 600-unit apartment house. - MM Mt Hood from Frank Munk (1901-99) and Nadia Munk (1902-2000) memorial benches at the terminus of the Marquam Nature Park Trail in Council Crest Park.
    [Show full text]
  • ADA Transition Plan Parks Supplement
    Final Draft: August 2015 CITY OF PORTLAND ADA Title II Transition Plan Update - Parks Facilities City of Portland ADA Title II Transition Plan Update- Parks Facilities Final Draft Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................... i Introduction ........................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ iv Document Organization .......................................................................................... iv 1.0 Transition Plan Process ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Planning Process ............................................................................................... 1 Facility Evaluations .....................................................................................................2 1.2 Public Engagement ............................................................................................ 3 Public Comment Summary ........................................................................................4 Stakeholders ..............................................................................................................4 Website ......................................................................................................................5 2.0 Transition Plan Methodology............................................................................
    [Show full text]