West Liaison

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

West Liaison WEST DISTRICT PROFILE November 2005 Acknowledgements City of Portland Bureau of Planning Gil Kelley, Planning Director Joe Zehnder, Principal Planner District Profile Staff Linda Peterson, District Planner Ellen Ryker, Former District Planner Denver Igarta, Community Service Aide Harper Kalin, Community Service Aide GIS/Graphics Gary Odenthal Carmen Piekarski Ralph Sanders For more information please contact: City of Portland Bureau of Planning 1900 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 4100 Portland, Oregon 97201 Phone: 503-823-7700 Fax: 503-823-7800 http://www.portlandonline.com/planning District Planner: Linda Peterson Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………. Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………. Area Description ……………………………………………………………………. Demographic Data ……………………………………………………………………. Neighborhood and Business Associations …………………………………… Facilities & Services ………………..………………………………………….. Land Use ……………………………………………………………………………….. Environment ……………………………………………………………………. Development Activity ……………………………………………………………. Economic Development ……………………………………………………………. Transportation ……………………………………………………………………. Existing Plans and Policies ……………………………………………………. Major Capital Improvement and Planning Projects ……………………………. Key Issues within the District .…………………………………………………… Potential Projects ………..………………………..…………………………………. Plan Implementation …………………………..…………………………………. j Introduction The Bureau of Planning’s District Planning Program assigns a city planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact for community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within the district. The District Planners have compiled District Profiles (www.portlandonline.com/planning) for each district. These are intended to provide the following: • an initial survey of conditions, issues and plans within each district, • background for informed decisions about future development, and • a tool with which to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The District Profiles are also intended as a means for ongoing exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. As such the District Profiles are always documents in progress and will be periodically updated. We encourage readers to contact us about any old, inaccurate or unclear information they see. Send comments on the Profile to [email protected]. Specific to the West District The West District Profile divides the district into two parts along SW Canyon Rd., also known as Highway 26 and the Sunset Highway. The part of the district lying north of Highway 26 is called Northwest or the northern part; to the south, Southwest or the southern part. This division largely, though not entirely, corresponds to the boundary between the Neighbors West Northwest (NW/NW) and Southwest Neighborhoods, Inc (SWNI) coalitions. This is despite the fact that properties between West Burnside and Highway 26 have a Southwest (SW) address. Therefore, most (though not all) maps and descriptors will be separated. Bureau of Planning - 12/16/05 West District Profile Area Description This section, Area Description, contains six topics: Boundaries, Brief History, Annexations, Adjacent Jurisdictions, Special Districts, and Urban Services. These topics identify the West District within the City of Portland and within the larger Portland metropolitan region. The West District is the largest Bureau of Planning (BOP) district in the city in terms of acreage, but the smallest in terms of population. It borders two of the fastest growing jurisdictions – Washington County and the City of Beaverton – in Oregon, and contains the largest amount of unincorporated urban lands in the city. The history of the West District parallels closely the early history of Portland, and many of Portland’s most well-known facilities and attractions can be found here. Boundaries The boundaries of the West District include the City of Portland boundary with Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas Counties on the north, west, and south and the following on the east: Willamette River, Central City, Goose Hollow, Northwest District Association, Northwest Industrial Neighborhood Association, Highway 30, and the non-urbanized portion of the Linnton Neighborhood Association. It also contains approximately 695 acres of land outside of the Urban Growth Boundary, all in the northern part of the district. Bureau of Planning - 12/16/05 Page 2 West District Profile Area Description Bureau of Planning - 12/16/05 Page 3 West District Profile Area Description DRAFT Bureau of Planning - 12/16/05 Page 1 West District Profile Area Description DRAFT Brief History The early history of much of the West District coincides with the early history of Portland following the arrival of Euro-American settlers. The West Hills were chosen as home sites relatively early in Portland’s history because of the terrain’s beauty and the outstanding views over the Willamette and Tualatin Valleys. Roads and railroads followed long used Native American pathways, roads now known as Cornell, Germantown, Sunset Highway, and Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway. In the northern part of the district, the more level land along the ridge and base of the hillside was soon transformed into farm and residential uses. The southern part saw logging, farms, and dairies. Development of the steeper, landslide-prone hillsides progressed more slowly. In the southwest home building proceeded slowly in most places as well, as builders contended with the area’s steep slopes and frequent landslides. In the northern part Hillside Drive (now known as Leif Erikson Drive) was built in 1915. The road meandered in and out of ravines along the mountain’s eastern slope, eventually connecting NW Thurman St. with Germantown Road. Several large subdivisions were platted along the scenic drive in anticipation of a major land boom following the Lewis and Clark Exposition. The steep terrain of the hillside, however, made building and road construction difficult and expensive. Ultimately, much of the land was forfeited to the City of Portland and to Multnomah County and has since been incorporated into Forest Park. In the southern part, railroads were the precursor of development. The Southern Pacific Railroad from Portland to Hillsboro, completed in the early 1880s, opened up the Fanno Creek area to initial development. The Oregon Electric Railroad in 1908 increased the pace of development. By this time, the number of independent farmers was on the decline as more and more heads of households were working for wages. Passenger service let them commute from home to work daily and they could live wherever they wanted as long as they had access to rail lines. Developers subdivided land along the rail lines into "garden home" lots, just large enough to build a home and plant a small garden. Train service improved and the fares were reduced, encouraging even greater development. The automobile arrived in the early 1900s. Throughout the district the rapid improvement of roads, the advent of more affordable automobile, and more advanced building techniques, including terracing and grading, increased development significantly. Many of Portland’s most well-known facilities and attractions can be found in the West District. The Alpenrose Dairy opened in 1891. The Terwilliger Parkway was created in 1912. The University of Oregon Medical School moved from downtown Portland to its present location on Marquam Hill in 1919. Lewis and Clark College relocated from Albany to its present site on the former Frank estate in 1943. In addition to the above, the West District contains the Oregon Zoo, Children’s Museum, World Forestry Center, Hoyt Arboretum, International Rose Test Garden, Pittock Mansion, and Vietnam War Memorial. Bureau of Planning - 12/16/05 Page 2 West District Profile Area Description DRAFT Annexations Most of the district was annexed into the City of Portland by 1920. There was then a lag of some 30 years, with the remainder of the properties within the city boundary being annexed in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. Adjacent Jurisdictions The West District shares boundaries with five other jurisdictions. These include the following cities and counties: Beaverton In 2000, 76,129 people lived within the City of Beaverton, up from only 5,937 in 1960. Recently, the City has been considering annexing land between it and Portland. These lands primarily straddle the southern part of the district. Bureau of Planning - 12/16/05 Page 3 West District Profile Area Description DRAFT Lake Oswego In 2000, Lake Oswego, to the south, was home to almost 36,000 people. Four major roads provide direct connections into Lake Oswego: Highway 43, Terwilliger, Boones Ferry, and Lesser Rd. Recently, residents in the Birdshill Community Planning Organization (CPO) have been considering de- annexation from the city. Clackamas County Over three acres of land within the West District belongs to Clackamas County. Multnomah County Most of the unincorporated pockets of land in the district – 25,578 acres – lie in Multnomah County. The City provides planning and zoning services to these properties. Most of the properties outside the Urban Growth Boundary within this district lie within this county. Washington County Washington County is the fastest-growing jurisdiction within the Portland metropolitan area. Over 300 acres of unincorporated
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF File Parks Capital and Planning Investments
    SWNI Commissioner Amanda Fritz Interim Director Kia Selley INVESTMENTS IN SOUTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS, INC. ANNOUNCED 2013-2018 August 2018 | Since 2013, Commissioner Amanda Fritz and Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) have allocated over $38M in park planning and capital investments in the Southwest Neighborhoods, Inc. coalition area. Funded by System Development Charges (SDCs), the Parks Replacement Bond (Bond), General Fund (GF), and in some cases matched by other partners, these investments grow, improve access to, or help maintain PP&R parks, facilities, and trails. Questions? Please call Jennifer Yocom at 503-823-5592. CAPITAL PROJECTS, ACQUISITIONS & PLANNING #1 APRIL HILL PARK BOARDWALK AND TRAIL Completed: Winter 2017 Investment: $635K ($498K SDCs; $83K Metro; $25K neighborhood #5 PORTLAND fundraising; $19K PP&R Land Stewardship; $10K BES) OPEN SPACE SEQUENCE Info: New boardwalks, bridges, trails; improves access, protects wetland. #2 DUNIWAY (TRACK & FIELD) #2 DUNIWAY PARK TRACK & FIELD DONATION #4 MARQUAM, #8 SOUTH Completed: Fall 2017 TERWILLIGER, WATERFRONT GEORGE HIMES Investment: Donation of full renovations provided by Under Armour (ACQUISITION & Info: Artificial turf improvement and track re-surfacing. RESTORATION) #3 MARSHALL PARK PLAYGROUND & ACQUISITION Completed: Summer 2015 | 2018 Investment: $977K (Play Area - $402K [$144K OPRD, $257K SDCs] + #11 RIEKE (FIELD) Acquisition - $575K [$450K SDCs, $125K Metro Local Share]) #6 Info: Playground, access to nature and seating improvements | two- #12 GABRIEL RED #9 WILLAMETTE
    [Show full text]
  • AUDUBON SOCIETY of PORTLAND Summer Camps!
    See page 7 for AUDUBON SOCIETY of PORTLAND Summer Camps! Black-throated MAY/JUNE 2013 Gray Warbler Volume 77 Numbers 5&6 Warbler Inside: Bird Song Walks continue Author Events: Handy Birdathon In this issue... in May at 7am Come to All Four! Envelope See page 3 See pages 2 & 9 See page 12 Vote Yes by May 21on Measure 26-152 to Restore Our Natural Areas by Jim Labbe, Urban Conservationist y the time you receive this Warbler, the May B2013 Special Election will be only a couple of weeks away. Photo: Gladys Ruiz Photo: D.Schertz We need your help making an extra push to spread the word When Kids & Teens Inspire Us and turn out the Yes votes for by Ian Abraham, Camp Director Measure 26-152. Please talk to your friends, family members, ong before the first week of camp begins, before the co-workers, and neighbors Animal Tracking 2011 photo: D.Schertz first camper arrives ready for an Audubon Summer about this important measure Paddling the Willamette LCamp, preparations for these marvelous adventures Yet oftentimes it is us who in the upcoming election. Narrows © Jim Labbe have begun. In truth, we begin planning for the next year’s are inspired! During staff Summer Camps before the current camps have come to training we discuss the In both 1995 and 2006, voters from Forest Grove to an end. We create the array of different camps to offer, impact that journaling Troutdale and from Portland to Wilsonville passed reserve the camping and field trip sites, get permits, reserve activities can have, and regional natural area acquisition bond measures by vehicles, buy supplies, and arrange a myriad of details to engage our staff in a number large majorities (60% or more).
    [Show full text]
  • What to See in Portland Update2009
    What to see in Portland, OR - by Marco Behrmann 07/02/2004 1/3 WHAT TO SEE IN PORTLAND , OR _________________________________________ Listed below you will find a couple of sights and my personal favourites to do in Portland. Since Portland was my town of exchange I do not know as many things about the other cities like Eugene, Corvallis, Ashland or La Grande. However, it would be just great if somebody could add tips about their places similar to the ones here, too! Please feel free to forward them to me (marcobehrmann[at]web.de ). I do not want you to believe that just because I stayed in Portland, and have many tips here for Portland, that a year at one of the other Oregon cities is not the same exciting. The tips listed here, however, are interesting for all Baden-Wuerttemberg students in Oregon, because many things you can already see and experience during your orientation weeks. (BTW: This is almost everything I did (among other things, of course) within my 2 ½ weeks of re-visiting in June 2004; but it took me a year of living in the city in 2001/02 to figure out which were the hot tips ☺) Here are my personal Must-Sees Oregon History Center in SW Park blocks right south of PSU (This museum features very interesting and well researched exhibitions about the development of Portland as a city as well as about the whole Pacific Northwest as it was discovered from the sea and the Columbia River; good place to check out during your orientation weeks; you get a student reduction with ISIC or other student ID card) Council Crest Park (considered the highest spot in Portland; nice views to Mt Hood, Mt Adams, Mt St Helens and even Mt Rainier on some days as well as to Beaverton; take Bus 51 [Vista]; the Bus driver often feels himself as an informal Portland guide; tell him that you are visiting and he even might stop for you at nice viewpoints to take pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • Macleay Trail Mile 54 MACLEAY TRAIL LOWER MACLEAY PARK in BRIEF
    0 0.13 0.25 246 60 hikes within 60 miles: Portland 54 Macleay Trail mile 54 MACLEAY TRAIL LOWER MACLEAY PARK IN BRIEF . KEY AT-A-GLANCE rl T If you just take the easier trip to the Audu- y i INFORMATION a le bon Society, you’ll get some quiet time in the ac r M we Cornell Rd. LENGTH: 2.2 miles to Upper Macleay woods, where you’ll see two monumental Lo Park and Audubon Society, 4.5 miles to Pittock Mansion trees, and enjoy close-up views of (caged) wild- CONFIGURATION: Out-and-back life. If you put in a little more effort, you’ll get Tunnel Trl. DIFFICULTY: Easy to Upper Macleay that and some history with a great view—and Wildwood Trl. Cumberland Rd. Park and Audubon Society, moderate to another monumental tree. And it’s all right in Pittock Mansion the middle of town! Stone Macleay Rd. SCENERY: Quiet woods, predatory birds l. House Tr (in cages), three must-see trees od wo ild EXPOSURE: Shady all the way, one road W crossing DESCRIPTION Wildwood Trl. TRAFFIC: Light on the trail weekdays, First, if the headquarters of the Forest Park Ivy . moderate on weekends; heavy at y Trl Removal Project (at the trailhead) is open, it’s Audubon aclea Pittock mansion Society r M Mansion UPPER Uppe worth a look inside. The project has cleared MACLEAY TRAIL SURFACE: Packed dirt, with some PARK gravel hundreds of acres and saved thousands of HIKING TIME: 1 hour to Audubon Soci- trees in Forest Park from invasive English ivy, ety, 2.5 hours for the whole thing which creates “ivy deserts,” where no native DRIVING DISTANCE: 3 miles (10 min- plants can survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads.Gigl.Org.Uk/Website/Parks People and Nature1.Pdf 8 Flores, T
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michelle Lee Talal for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science presented on May 7, 2019 Title: Exploring Urban Parks: Plant Communities, Visitor Experiences, and Manager Perspectives in Portland, Oregon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Mary V. Santelmann Urban parks are biodiversity hotspots within cities and have the potential to provide a range of socio-cultural benefits for people, but may not always meet the needs and desires of park visitors. A variety of land use practices and environmental factors affect urban park biodiversity and vegetation structure, composition, and ecological function, but more studies are needed to compare plant taxonomic composition, biodiversity patterns, and species traits across different types of urban green spaces. Additionally, there is a lack of research that explores park user experiences, vegetation perceptions, and accessibility issues in a range of urban park types interspersed throughout Portland using qualitative methods to observe and interview visitors on-site. More research is also needed that focuses on interviewing park managers about their perspectives on park benefits and management. The findings of my interdisciplinary dissertation may assist managers in their aims to achieve various ecological goals, as well as meet the needs and desires of park visitors within increasingly developed urban areas. The purpose of this research is three-fold, and includes examining: 1) The relationships between plant community composition, biodiversity patterns, environmental variables, and species traits in a range of urban parks in Portland, Oregon; 2) how the vegetation in these urban parks currently meets the needs and desires of visitors; and 3) how park managers currently manage vegetation in the parks to meet the needs and desires of visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the River 2006-07
    State of the River 2006–07 iver Renaissance is the City of Portland’s initiative to reclaim the Willamette River as a community centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the Columbia River. The Willamette is the heart of Portland’s landscape, history, and culture. The Columbia is our economic and ecologic lifeline to the Pacific. River Renaissance Rpromotes and celebrates these waters as living emblems of Portland’s identity. Portland lives its river values every day in ways big and small. Together these actions are reconnecting citizens and businesses with a healthier river. The State of the River Report profiles yearly accomplishments and identifi es future actions needed to assure a clean and healthy river, a prosperous harbor, and vibrant riverfronts. Just a few of the actions detailed in this report are illustrated on this page to give some idea of how deeply Portland believes in caring for—and being cared for by—our rivers. 2006–07 State of the River Report Contents River Renaissance is a Leadership . 2 community-wide initiative to Message from the River Renaissance Directors . 3 reclaim the Willamette River Introduction . 4 as Portland’s centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the How the City that Works Works on the River . 5 Columbia River. The initiative Accomplishments and Key Actions . 7 promotes and celebrates Portland’s Progress Measures . 23 waters as our chief environmental, 2007–2008 Action Agenda . 35 economic and urban asset. Up and Down the Willamette . 55 Partners . 61 Recommended Readings . 63 The 2006–07 State of the River Report summarizes the achievements made by the City of Portland and a network of community partners to revitalize our rivers and identifies next steps needed to continue progress.
    [Show full text]
  • 4T (Trail, Tram, Trolley, Train)
    PORTLAND: 4T – TRAIL, TRAM, TROLLEY AND TRAIN Portland Hop on a bus or MAX train near home or park downtown, then head to the Washington Park MAX station at 4001 SW 4T – Trail, Tram, Trolley and Train Canyon Road in Portland. (Note: Please do not park in the For the ultimate Portland excursion, Oregon Zoo parking lot, which is reserved for the zoo and experience Portland’s 4T. Begin with a hike on nearby businesses only.) the Marquam Trail to the city’s highest point, Walk south along the Oregon Zoo toward the roar of the Council Crest, then pass through the campus Sunset Highway. Cross over it on an elevated roadway, Knight of Oregon Health and Science University Boulevard, walking on its left (east) side. Cross the highway (OHSU). From there, catch a free ride down on-ramp and turn left to walk east on the shoulder to a the Portland Aerial Tram to the South trailhead for the Marquam Trail. Ascend the trail to Patton Waterfront District along the Willamette Road and turn right onto Patton. River. There, hop on the streetcar (trolley) and enjoy the ride into downtown Portland, At the intersection of Humphrey, Patton and Talbot, turn where you can return to the start via a MAX left onto Talbot; there is very little shoulder on Talbot so use light rail train. The walking portion of this caution. Enter Council Crest Park at a pedestrian path that loop, from zoo to tram, is 3.95 to 4.5 miles, begins at the intersection of Talbot Road, Talbot Terrace, depending on the route you take.
    [Show full text]
  • OR Wild -Backmatter V2
    208 OREGON WILD Afterword JIM CALLAHAN One final paragraph of advice: do not burn yourselves out. Be as I am — a reluctant enthusiast.... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted fanatic. Save the other half of your- selves and your lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough to fight for the land; it is even more important to enjoy it. While you can. While it is still here. So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests, climb the mountains, bag the peaks, run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and lucid air, sit quietly for awhile and contemplate the precious still- ness, the lovely mysterious and awesome space. Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and your head firmly attached to the body, the body active and alive and I promise you this much: I promise you this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those desk-bound men with their hearts in a safe-deposit box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators. I promise you this: you will outlive the bastards. —Edward Abbey1 Edward Abbey. Ed, take it from another Ed, not only can wilderness lovers outlive wilderness opponents, we can also defeat them. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (sic) UNIVERSITY, SHREVEPORT UNIVERSITY, to do nothing. MES SMITH NOEL COLLECTION, NOEL SMITH MES NOEL COLLECTION, MEMORIAL LIBRARY, LOUISIANA STATE LOUISIANA LIBRARY, MEMORIAL —Edmund Burke2 JA Edmund Burke. 1 Van matre, Steve and Bill Weiler.
    [Show full text]
  • PP&R's FY 2021-22 Requested Budget
    Requested Budget FY 2021-22 Portland Parks & Recreation PP&R Staff FY 2021-22 Requested Budget Maximo Behrens, Recreation Services Manager Tonya Booker, Land Stewardship Manager Carmen Rubio, Commissioner-in-charge Jenn Cairo, Urban Forestry Manager Tim Collier, Public Information Manager Adena Long, Director Margaret Evans, Workforce Development Manager Todd Lofgren, Deputy Director Vicente Harrison, Security and Emergency Manager Lauren McGuire, Assets and Development Manager Claudio Campuzano, Manager Kenya Williams, Equity and Inclusion Manager Finance, Property, & Technology Department Kerry Anderson Andre Ashley Don Athey Darryl Brooks Budget Advisory Committee Tamara Burkovskaia Krystin Castro Board Members Riley Clark-Long Paul Agrimis Mara Cogswell Mike Elliott Dale Cook Jenny Glass Terri Davis Juan Piantino Leah Espinoza Paddy Tillett Rachel Felice Bonnie Gee Yosick Joan Hallquist Erin Zollenkopf Erik Harrison Britta Herwig Labor Partners Brett Horner Sadie Atwell, Laborers Local 483 Don Joughin Luis Flores, PCL Brian Landoe Yoko Silk, PTE-17 Robin Laughlin Sara Mayhew-Jenkins Community Representatives Todd Melton Pauline Miranda Jeremy Robbins, Portland Accessibility Advisory Council Soo Pak Andre Middleton, Friends of Noise Dylan Paul Chris Rempel, Native American Community Advisory Council Nancy Roth JR Lilly, East Portland Action Plan Victor Sanders Joe McFerrin, Portland Opportunities Industrialization Center Jamie Sandness Brian Flores Garcia, Youth Durelle Singleton Sabrina Wilson, Rosewood Initiative Chris Silkie Jenny
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
    2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
    [Show full text]
  • General Land Office Book
    FORWARD n 1812, the General Land Office or GLO was established as a federal agency within the Department of the Treasury. The GLO’s primary responsibility was to oversee the survey and sale of lands deemed by the newly formed United States as “public domain” lands. The GLO was eventually transferred to the Department of Interior in 1849 where it would remain for the next ninety-seven years. The GLO is an integral piece in the mosaic of Oregon’s history. In 1843, as the GLO entered its third decade of existence, new sett lers and immigrants had begun arriving in increasing numbers in the Oregon territory. By 1850, Oregon’s European- American population numbered over 13,000 individuals. While the majority resided in the Willamette Valley, miners from California had begun swarming northward to stake and mine gold and silver claims on streams and mountain sides in southwest Oregon. Statehood would not come for another nine years. Clearing, tilling and farming lands in the valleys and foothills and having established a territorial government, the settlers’ presumed that the United States’ federal government would act in their behalf and recognize their preemptive claims. Of paramount importance, the sett lers’ claims rested on the federal government’s abilities to negotiate future treaties with Indian tribes and to obtain cessions of land—the very lands their new homes, barns and fields were now located on. In 1850, Congress passed an “Act to Create the office of the Surveyor-General of the public lands in Oregon, and to provide for the survey and to make donations to settlers of the said public lands.” On May 5, 1851, John B.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-T National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    12-t NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10244018 (Rev. fr«6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1 . Name of Property historic name J.G. .- House other names/site number 11 Pen-y-Br in " 2. Location street & number ?64 R .qw AH-^ V-ict-t-^ pi are M Ux. not for publication city, town Port "i rnn^ N y^ vicinity code np state Oregon"* county Muitrrmah code 05 1 z'p coc*e Q^nn 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property fxl private [X] building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local I I district 1 ____ buildings I I public-State Ulsite ____ ____ sites I I public-Federal I structure _____ ____ structures I object ____ ____ objects 1 n Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously _______________N/A__________ listed in the National Register N/A 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this [XJ nomination LJ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]