High Country News Vol. 23.10, June 3, 1991

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Country News Vol. 23.10, June 3, 1991 A Paper for People who care about the West One dollar A fading Yellowstone 'Vision' I ____ ,by Michael Milstein der, a political line created in Washing- example, would be carried out unobtru- to the public at a series of meetings held ton, D.C., in 1872. sively and with consideration for wildlife in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho, they had hoped for a fOTUmthat would con- rom space you would see the Although the trees stop at that line, and human needs on both sides of park vince both environmentalists and com- boundary of Yellowstone Nation- the ecological processes do not. Grizzly and forest boundaries. "We wanted to set up a scene," says modity producers that it was good for al Park drawn like a line in the bears and trumpeter swans cross it. Plant F Yellowstone National Park Superinten- everyone. What they got, however, was sand. Except here the line is drawn with seeds cross it. Air, and the pollution it car- criticism from all sides. Miners, loggers trees - plentiful on the park side, miss- ries, cross it. Streams and rivers cross it. dent Bob Barbee, "not to restrict people, but to ensure that the place doesn't get and livestock owners complained that ing on the other side. Even travelers, driving on roads, cross it. the plan would expand national park pro- In a satellite view of the Yellow- In earlier times, land managers messed up." tection of resources into national forests, stone region, composed of six national never really looked beyond their own Never before had public land man- ending multiple use. Environmentalists forests and two ~ational parks, mountain boundaries. But in 1989 a coalition of agers tried to operate according to biolog- called the plan weak, but later rallied to ranges stand out as narrow strips of park and forest chiefs in what is now ical and ecological boundaries on such a support it as defensive land managers white. Lakes and reservoirs are dark blue called the Greater Yellowstone ecosys- large scale. Last year they approved a backpedaled under the onslaught from and evergreen forests come out dark red. tem embarked on a pioneering plan to draft document outlining this approach Along Yellowstone's westem edge, the coordinate their management. Instead of called "Vision for the Future: A Frame- the resource users. "Somewhere along the line some- red abruptly shifts to concentrated running their domains as independent work for Coordination in the Greater Yel- thing went awry," recalls Barbee. "All of specks of white. Those are Targhee federal units, they proposed to consider lowstone Area." It has become popularly a 'sudden it became an evil on one side National Forest clearcuts, where timber the whole ecosystem in managing their known as "the vision plan." and a toothless wonder on the other." has been razed right up to the park bor- interdependent resources. Logging, for When land managers took their plan Now, after the public meetings, more I than 7,000 mostly negative public com- I ments, and letters from dozens of politi- cians, "the vision" is fading. Due out in I [mal form later this month, the plan will \I I be much shorter and more concise than it was. While some strong elements may 11 I J remain, the vision will probably have lost some of its far-reaching impact. "What we have now may not be as II, , luminous as we had originally project- ed," said Marshall Gingery, assistant superintendent of Grand Teton National - Park. "But it will still come down to how much pressure the public will put on us to manage the fight way." fany place should be managed according to its ecological needs, it Iis probably the Greater Yellowstone region, one of the last largely intact ecosystems in the world's temperate zones. Encompassing almost I 2 million acres, it includes Yellowstone National Park - the world's first - and majestic Grand Teton National Park. Surrounding that heart are the Shoshone National For- \I I I est - the nation's first --and five other !) forests, two wildlife refuges and assorted I state and private lands. Each site, however, has a different (I administration. The six national forests, for I) example, are under three different regional II offices, all with different priorities. I ,"We need the people responsible for this place to look at it as one big unit, I I which it is in the eyes of nature, and develop spared ideals," says Ed Lewis, iJJ director of the Greater Yellowstone I I ,I Coalition. "We need to look at timber sales in terms of what they will do to this entire natural treasure, not what they will I!) do for a certain timber company." Ironically, the term Greater Yellow- stone was first used in I917 to suggest II an expansion of Yellowstone Park. Nov- elist Emerson Hough wrote glowingly in the Saturday Evening Post, "Give her [Wyoming] Greater Yellowstone and she will inevitably become greater Wyoming." Since then, Greater Yellowstone has been named a world biosphere reserve. The region includes the largest collection of geysers and thermal features on Earth, and famous herds of bison, moose and elk, as well as remnants of threatened Jeff Henry Elk at the north boundary of Yellowstone National Park Continued on page 10 Une T.... 2 - High Country News - jU1/e 3, 1991 The whiteness tradeoff ~-=== The Emily L. Jackson Memorial Fund Another set of visitors wasn't pass- During March and April at least 16 ing through at all - they were here to readers took time to write or call in their Three unexpected checks from read- nest. Chris and Barbara Manning and reactions to our new non-chlorine- ers spurred us to consider how we could their children, Lima and Hale, recently bleached, part-recycled paper. What fol- honor the spirit of Emily Jackson [see moved to Paonia from Basalt, just over lows is an interim report, since we asked her story on page 7]. We had already the hill. the question again in our recent readers' decided to plant a small high-desert gar- survey and will have a much bigger sam- den behind HCN's new building in Corrections pling of opinion to report later. memory of her. But we can do some- According to our tally sheet, all 16 thing bigger, too, thanks to the generosi- In May 8's lead story, we reported strongly supported the change, and six ty of readers who have asked us to use that the Toiyabe National Forest in expressed their willingness to pay more to their contributions in a way Emily would Nevada is the second largest national help with the higher cost, Two readers like. So we are starting a fund to help forest in the country, an error quickly pointed out that over time, a better market defray the living expenses of HCN pointed oot to us by T. Meacham, a read- for recycled paper will develop, quality interns. Though some of our interns cap er in Anchorage, Alaska. The Toiyabe will improve and prices will go down. count on financial support from home to (3.2 million acres) is outsized by not "Good for you not to wait," one of them ffiGH COUNTRY NEWS tide them over twelve weeks without only the Tongass (16.7 million acres) but added. Two readers asked that we work (ISSN/019i15(i57) is published biweek- pay, many others - including Emily- also the Chugach (5.6 million acres). toward a higher post-consumer waste per- ly, except for one issue 'duririg July plan and save for months to make it Both of these forests are in Alaska. centage, and several urged us to forget and one issue during January, by the work. We know Emily would cheer for Thanks to Susan Seyl, photographs whiteness and brightness altogether and High Country Foundation, 124 Grand this one. ' librarian of the Oregon Historical Soci- go for 100 percent recycled - "I don't Avenue. Paonia, CO81428. Second- Checks earmarked for the Emily L. class postage paid at Paonia, Col- ety, for correcting a credit line in the care if it's brown and speckled," "1 don't orado. Jackson Memorial Fund will go toward April 22 issue. The old salmon-can label care if it's thin and gray." One realist POSTMASTER: send address changes rent and grocery money for interns who that appeared on page 5 is part of the observed that photographs reproduced on to HIGH COUNTRY NEWS, Box 1090, need a boost, In time, we hope the fund society's Seufert Collection. this paper are "a little muddy in the shad- Paonia, CO 81428. will enable us to attract prospective Now for an omission - the street ows but overall hold up well." Finally, Subscriptions are $24 per year for interns who otherwise could not come address of Solar Box Cookers North- thanks to the reader who raised the ques- individuals and public libraries, $34 here at all. west, for those inspired by last issue's tion, "Should HCN be recycled with high- per year for institutions. Single copies story on the ingenious box and its inven- quality office paper, or should we throw it $1 plus postage and handlliig . .special , Passing through tors. It is 192215thAvenue East, Seattle, Issues $3 each. in with the newspapers?" The answer is WA98112. that when HCN's earthly race is run and The office lately has been a popular it's been passed along to your friends and Tom Bell flyway for well-wishers heading home 'Peaceful woman' keeps getting mail Editor Emeritus colleagues or read to tatters at the library from Utah parks.
Recommended publications
  • Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers 2015 Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy Jordan Carper [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp Part of the Environmental Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Carper, Jordan, "Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy" (2015). Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers. 68. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/68 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LINKING ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND STEWARDSHIP IN COLORADO: LEARNING FROM THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY By JORDAN M. CARPER Undergraduate Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the University Scholar distinction and for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Biology The University of Montana Missoula, MT December 2015 Approved by: Brock Tessman, Dean The Davidson Honors College Sarah J. Halvorson, Professor Geography Carper, Jordan, B.A., December 2015 Biology Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy Faculty Mentor: Sarah J. Halvorson ABSTRACT The Rocky Mountain Conservancy (RMC) is a well-known nonprofit organization supporting restoration and environmental stewardship and leadership in Rocky Mountain National Park. The RMC promotes stewardship of Rocky Mountain National Park and similar lands through education and philanthropy.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas
    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Summit County WRNF Proposed Special Management Area & Wilderness
    TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION Monday, June 16, 2014 2nd Level Conference Room Breckenridge Town Hall 150 Ski Hill Road 4:00 Site visit to the Blue River Corridor and McCain Property (Please meet behind Town Hall on mountain bike) 5:30 Call to Order, Roll Call 5:35 Discussion/approval of Minutes – May 19, 2014 8 5:45 Discussion/approval of Agenda 5:50 Public Comment (Non-Agenda Items) 6:00 Staff Summary 2 • Field Season Update • Swan River Restoration Update 6:15 Open Space • Town Council Update 2 • Blue River Restoration and Blue River Corridor Projects 11 • Pump Track Discussion 5 • Cobb and Ebert Placer Management Plan Revision 42 • Central Mountains Wilderness Proposal 65 7:45 Executive Session 8:15 Adjourn For further information, please contact the Open Space and Trails Program at 970-547-3155 (Scott) or 970-453-3371 (Chris). Memorandum To: Breckenridge Open Space Advisory Commission From: Open Space Staff Re: June 16, 2014 Meeting Staff Summary Field Season Update The 2014 summer field season has begun, and the newly expanded, six-person trail crew has been working to repair and open the Town trails. The persistent, deep snowpack has hampered work on some projects, and the high water flows have resulted in new maintenance needs. Recently completed projects include: • Removed downed and hazard trees on system-wide trails- particularly Iowa Hill, Upper Flume, and Minnie Mine Trails. • Implemented Cucumber Gulch fencing closures and seasonal signage. • Planted 400 native tree seedlings in the Discovery Hill forest health treatment area. • Repaired drainage on Lower Flume (in cooperation with Public Works) and Mike’s Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America
    H. R. 631 One Hundred Third Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three An Act To designate certain lands in the State of Colorado as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND DEFINITIONS. (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as the ``Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993''. (b) DEFINITIONS.Ð(1) As used in this Act with reference to lands in the National Forest System, the term ``the Secretary'' means the Secretary of Agriculture. (2) As used in this Act with respect to lands not in the National Forest System, the term ``the Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Interior. SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO THE WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM. (a) ADDITIONS.ÐThe following lands in the State of Colorado are hereby designated as wilderness and, therefore, as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) Certain lands in the Gunnison Resource Area adminis- tered by the Bureau of Land Management which comprise approximately 3,390 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ``American Flats Additions to the Big Blue Wilderness Proposal (American Flats)'', dated January, 1993, and which are hereby incorporated in and shall be deemed to be a part of the wilderness area designated by section 102(a)(1) of Public Law 96±560 and renamed Uncompahgre Wilderness by section 3(f) of this Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Region 2 – Historical Geography, Names, Boundaries
    NAMES, BOUNDARIES, AND MAPS: A RESOURCE FOR THE HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION (Region Two) By Peter L. Stark Brief excerpts of copyright material found herein may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, education, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder under 17 U.S.C § 107 of the United States copyright law. Copyright holder does ask that you reference the title of the essay and my name as the author in the event others may need to reach me for clarifi- cation, with questions, or to use more extensive portions of my reference work. Also, please contact me if you find any errors or have a map that has not been included in the cartobibliography ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the process of compiling this work, I have met many dedicated cartographers, Forest Service staff, academic and public librarians, archivists, and entrepreneurs. I first would like to acknowledge the gracious assistance of Bob Malcolm Super- visory Cartographer of Region 2 in Golden, Colorado who opened up the Region’s archive of maps and atlases to me in November of 2005. Also, I am indebted to long-time map librarians Christopher Thiry, Janet Collins, Donna Koepp, and Stanley Stevens for their early encouragement and consistent support of this project. In the fall of 2013, I was awarded a fellowship by The Pinchot Institute for Conservation and the Grey Towers National Historic Site. The Scholar in Resi- dence program of the Grey Towers Heritage Association allowed me time to write and edit my research on the mapping of the National Forest System in an office in Gifford Pinchot’s ancestral home.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado
    Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3130 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: View to the southeast, from high gravel-capped hill near the town of Winter Park, looking toward snow- clad peaks along the Continental Divide east of Berthoud Pass. High peak on the far left is James Peak, 13,294 ft, (4,052 m). In foreground, the dense forest is composed of conifers and aspen, and is growing in soils formed in surficial deposits and weathered bedrock. Photograph by R.R. Shroba, September 26, 2006. Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado By Ralph R. Shroba, Bruce Bryant, Karl S. Kellogg, Paul K. Theobald, and Theodore R. Brandt Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3130 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://www.store usgs.. gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilderness Act of 1964
    The Wilderness Act of 1964 Source: US House of Representatives Office of the Law This is the 1964 act that started it all Revision Counsel website at and created the first designated http://uscode.house.gov/download/ascii.shtml wilderness in the US and Nevada. This version, updated January 2, 2006, includes a list of all wilderness designated before that date. The list does not mention designations made by the December 2006 White Pine County bill. -CITE- 16 USC CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM 01/02/2006 -EXPCITE- TITLE 16 - CONSERVATION CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -HEAD- CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -MISC1- Sec. 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of policy; wilderness areas; administration for public use and enjoyment, protection, preservation, and gathering and dissemination of information; provisions for designation as wilderness areas. (b) Management of area included in System; appropriations. (c) "Wilderness" defined. 1132. Extent of System. (a) Designation of wilderness areas; filing of maps and descriptions with Congressional committees; correction of errors; public records; availability of records in regional offices. (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classifications as primitive areas; Presidential recommendations to Congress; approval of Congress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado. (c) Review by Secretary of the Interior of roadless areas of national park system and national wildlife refuges and game ranges and suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; authority of Secretary of the Interior to maintain roadless areas in national park system unaffected. (d) Conditions precedent to administrative recommendations of suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; publication in Federal Register; public hearings; views of State, county, and Federal officials; submission of views to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Potential of National Forest RARE II and Wilderness Areas in Colorado
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of National Forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Colorado Compiled By Robert P. Dickerson 1 Open-File Report 86-0364 1986 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 173) Page Introduction..................................................... 1 Grand Mesa, Gunnison, and Uncompahgre National Forests........... 2 Elk Mountains-Collegiate (2-180)............................ 2 Collegiate Peaks Wilderness (NF-180)........................ 2 Elk Mountains-Collegiate (2-180)............................ 5 Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness (NF-047)................... 5 Oh-Be-Joyful (2-181)........................................ 6 Ragged Mountain Wilderness (NF-181)......................... 7 Raggeds (2-181)............................................. 7 Drift Creek (2-182).......................................... 9 Perham Creek (2-183)........................................ 9 Springhouse Park (2-184).................................... 10 Electric Mountain (2-185)................................... 10 Clear Creek (2-186)......................................... 11 Hightower (2-189)........................................... 12 Priest Mountain (2-191)..................................... 12 Salt Creek (2-192).......................................... 12 Battlement Mesa (2-193)....................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Designate Certain Additional National Forest Lands in the State of Colorado As Components of the National Wilderness Preservation System
    98 S.2032 Title: A bill to designate certain additional national forest lands in the State of Colorado as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System. Sponsor: Sen Hart, Gary W. [CO] (introduced 10/31/1983) Cosponsors (None) Latest Major Action: 9/18/1984 Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Subcommittee on Public Lands and Reserved Water. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 98-1244. SUMMARY AS OF: 10/31/1983--Introduced. Colorado National Forest Wilderness Act of 1983 - Designates the following lands in Colorado as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) the Service Creek Wilderness Area in the Routt National Forest; (2) the Buffalo Peaks Wilderness Area in the Pike and San Isabel National Forests; (3) the Cannibal Plateau Wilderness Area in the Uncompaghre National Forest; (4) lands in the Routt National Forest which shall be incorporated in the Mount Zirkel Wilderness Area; (5) the Fossil Ridge Wilderness Area in the Gunnison National Forest; (6) the Greenhorn Mountain Wilderness Area in the San Isabel National Forest; (7) lands in the Pike National Forest which shall be incorporated in the Lost Creek Wilderness Area; (8) lands in the Grand Mesa National Forest which shall be incorporated in the Raggeds Wilderness Area; (9) the Piedra Wilderness Area in the San Juan National Forest; (10) the St. Louis Peak Wilderness Area in the Arapahoe National Forest; (11) the Vasquez Peak Wilderness Area in the Arapahoe National Forest; (12) the Sangre de Cristo Wilderness Area in the San Isabel
    [Show full text]