DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3130 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: View to the southeast, from high gravel-capped hill near the town of Winter Park, looking toward snow- clad peaks along the Continental Divide east of Berthoud Pass. High peak on the far left is James Peak, 13,294 ft, (4,052 m). In foreground, the dense forest is composed of conifers and aspen, and is growing in soils formed in surficial deposits and weathered bedrock. Photograph by R.R. Shroba, September 26, 2006. Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado By Ralph R. Shroba, Bruce Bryant, Karl S. Kellogg, Paul K. Theobald, and Theodore R. Brandt Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3130 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://www.store usgs.. gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Shroba, R.R., Bryant, Bruce, Kellogg, K.S., Theobald, P.K., and Brandt, T.R., 2010, Geologic map of the Fraser 7.5-minute quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3130, scale 1:24,000, 1 sheet, 26 p. pamphlet. [Available at URL http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3130]. iii Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Description of Map Units ..............................................................................................................................5 Surficial Deposits ..................................................................................................................................5 Artificial Fill Deposits...................................................................................................................5 Alluvial Deposits...........................................................................................................................5 Alluvial and Mass-Movement Deposits ...................................................................................8 Mass-Movement Deposits .........................................................................................................9 Glacial Deposits .........................................................................................................................10 Bedrock Units ......................................................................................................................................11 Post-Laramide Sedimentary and Volcanic Rocks ................................................................11 Pre-Laramide Sedimentary Rocks ..........................................................................................12 Proterozoic Rocks ......................................................................................................................12 Eolian Silt Contributions to the Troublesome Formation in the Fraser Basin .....................................14 Structural Setting of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle .......................................................................16 Geologic History of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle .........................................................................16 Proterozoic History .............................................................................................................................16 Paleozoic through Laramide History ...............................................................................................17 Post-Laramide Cenozoic History ......................................................................................................17 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................21 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................21 Figures 1. Index of 7.5- and 15-minute quadrangles referred to in this report ..............................3 2. Regional geologic setting of parts of the Front and Gore Ranges and adjacent basins ..............................................................................................................4 3. Index of geologic mapping in figure 2 ................................................................................5 4. Plot of mean particle size and degree of sorting (standard deviation of the mean particle size) of silty sandstone, siltstone, and clayey siltstone collected from the Troublesome Formation near Fraser, Colorado .............................15 Tables 1. Particle-size analyses of silty sandstone, siltstone, and clayey siltstone collected from the Troublesome Formation near Fraser, Colorado ......................................2 2. Approximate height, in meters, of top of gravelly stream alluvium (Qg and QNg) above the Fraser River and its major tributaries: Saint Louis Creek and Ranch Creek in the Fraser 7.5-minute quadrangle ........................13 3. Mean annual precipitation near Kremmling, Granby, and Fraser, Colorado ....................15 4. Mean January and July temperatures near Fraser, Colorado, and estimated mean January and July temperatures near the Mary Jane site, about 9 km southeast of Fraser .....................................................................................................................20 iv Conversion Factors Multiply By To obtain Length centimeter (cm) 0.3937 inch (in.) meter (m) 3.281 foot (ft) kilometer (km) 0.6214 mile (mi) square kilometers (km2) 0.386 square miles (mi2) Temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) may be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) as follows: °F=(1.8×°C)+32 Temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) may be converted to degrees Celsius (°C) as follows: °C=(°F-32)/1.8 Altitude, as used in this report, refers to distance above the vertical datum. v Divisions of Quaternary, Neogene, and Paleogene time used in this report Period or Subperiod Epoch Age Holocene 0–11.5 ka Quaternary late 11.5–132 ka Pleistocene middle 132–788 ka early 788 ka–1.81 Ma Neogene Pliocene 1.81–5.33 Ma Miocene 5.33–23.0 Ma Paleogene Oligocene 23.0–33.9 Ma Eocene 33.9–55.8 Ma Paleocene 55.8–65.5 Ma Ages of time boundaries are those of the U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Names Committee (2007) except those for the late-middle Pleistocene and middle-early Pleistocene boundaries, which are those of Richmond and Fullerton (1986a). Ages are expressed in ka for kilo-annum (thousand years) and Ma for mega-annum (million years). North American land mammal ages used in this report Land Mammal Age Age Hemphillian 4.7–8.9 Ma Clarendonian 8.9–11.6 Ma Arikareean 19–29 Ma Ages of time boundaries are those of Woodburne and Swisher (1995). Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado By Ralph R. Shroba, Bruce Bryant, Karl S. Kellogg, Paul K. Theobald, and Theodore R. Brandt Introduction on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1983), whereas the other map units (“bedrock units”) are informal or formal lithostrati- graphic or informal lithodemic units. For these reasons, subdi- The geology of the Fraser 7.5-minute quadrangle was visions of allostratigraphic or lithodemic units use time terms compiled from previous and new mapping. Theobald mapped much of the southern one-third of the quadrangle during “late” and “early” as applied to surficial units or Proterozoic 1959–1963. Many of the geologic units and geologic features crystalline units, but we use position terms “upper” and observed by Theobald along old logging roads and some of the “lower” where applied to lithostratigraphic units. aqueduct cuts are no longer visible, due chiefly to the depo- Age assignments for surficial deposits within the map sition of colluvium and regeneration of dense forest cover. area are based chiefly on relative heights above present stream Materials available from Theobald’s work in the Fraser quad- channels, the relative degree of modification of their original rangle included a preliminary geologic map of the southern depositional morphology, and degree of soil development and one-third of the quadrangle, field notes, and field sheets. None clast weathering. of his petrographic information, rock samples, or map-unit The mapped distribution of surficial map units is based descriptions was available to the other co-authors. primarily on interpretation of 1:40,000-scale, color-infrared Bryant made a reconnaissance geologic map of the aerial photographs taken in 1988 (National Aerial Photogra- northern two-thirds of the Fraser quadrangle during 1974 as phy Program (NAPP), http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/booklets/
Recommended publications

  • Blue River Valley Stratigraphic Chart

    Blue River Valley Hydrogeologic Geologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Unit Modern Alluvium and outwash deposits Alluvial Aquifer Quaternary Glacial deposits Glacial deposits Glaciation Older stream and outwash terrace Local perched deposits aquifer Troublesome Formation Local aquifer Neogene Extension Volcanic rocks Volcanics Paleogene Transition Paleogene and Cretaceous intrusive Crystalline rocks bedrock Laramide Pierre Shale Smoky Hill Member Fort Hayes Limestone Pierre confining Niobrara Niobrara Formation Cretaceous unit Interior Carlile Shale Seaway Greenhorn Limestone Graneros Shale Benton Group Dakota Sandstone Dakota Aquifer Morrison Formation Morrison Aquifer Jurassic Mesozoic Entrada Sandstone Entrada Aquifer Sandstones Chinle confining Triassic Chinle Formation unit Permian Maroon Formation Ancestral Maroon-Minturn Rocky Aquifer Mountains Minturn Formation Pennsylvanian Mississippian No strata Devonian Chaffee Group Paleozoic Silurian Mississippian- Carbonates Cambrian Ordovician Manitou Formation carbonate aquifer Dotsero Formation and Cambrian Sawatch Sandstone Crystalline rocks of igneous and Crystalline Precambrian Precambrian metamorphic origin in mountainous bedrock region Table 12a-05-01. Blue River Valley stratigraphic chart. Blue River Valley Unit Thickness Hydrogeologic Geologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Physical Characteristics Hydrologic Characteristics (ft) Unit Well to poorly-sorted, uncemented sands, silts and gravels along modern Modern Alluvium and outwash deposits >35 Alluvial Aquifer streams and
  • 8.4.0 Wolford Mountain Site C 8.4.1 Location And

    8.4.0 Wolford Mountain Site C 8.4.1 Location And

    8.4.0 WOLFORD MOUNTAIN SITE C 8.4.1 LOCATION AND TOPOGRAPHY Wolford Mountain Site C is located on Muddy Creek, 5 miles north of Kremmling, Colorado and 3.8 miles upstream from Site A'. The dam site is a 250-foot wide canyon with sides that rise steeply to a height of approximately 80 feet. At that point, the left abutment is relatively flat for about 500 feet, continuing east to the base of Wolford Mountain. The right abutment slopes gently upwards towards Highway U.S. 40, located 0.7 miles west of the site. Figure 8.4.1 presents a plan view of the Wolford Mountain Site C. A 120-foot high dam at Site C would impound a reservoir of 60,000 af capacity with a water surface elevation of 7485 feet. This is 10 feet higher than the water surface elevation proposed for an alternative reservoir at Site A'. Approximately 1900 acres would be occupied by the reservoir and lake shore area. An area-capacity curve is presented on Figure 8.4.2. 8.4.2 PRIOR STUDIES Wolford Mountain Site C has been under investigation by the CRWCD. A report titled "Rock Creek Dam Project", prepared by Morrison-Knudsen Engineers, Inc. (1986) for the River District, considered three reservoir capacities for this Muddy Creek Site: 60,000, 46,800 and 30,400 af. The feasibility report illustrates a preliminary design for the selected 46,800 af size. Information from this report has been liberally incorporated into this section on Wolford Mountain Site C. The report titled "Seismotectonic Hazard Evaluation, Rock Creek Project Near Kremmling, Grand And Routt Counties, Colorado", was prepared by Michael West and Associates (1986) for Morrison-Knudsen Engineers as part of their study for the CRWCD.
  • Vol. 7 National Family Farm Discovery Dox

    Vol. 7 National Family Farm Discovery Dox

    Case: 19-70115, 08/13/2019, ID: 11396549, DktEntry: 36-7, Page 1 of 233 No. 19-70115 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL FAMILY FARM COALITION, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents, and MONSANTO COMPANY, Intervenor-Respondent. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PETITIONERS’ EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME VII of IX ______________________ CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL George A. Kimbrell DIVERSITY Sylvia Shih-Yau Wu Stephanie M. Parent Amy van Saun PO Box 11374 2009 NE Alberta St., Suite 207 Portland, OR 97211 Portland, OR 97211 T: (971) 717-6404 T: (971) 271-7372 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners Case: 19-70115, 08/13/2019, ID: 11396549, DktEntry: 36-7, Page 2 of 233 INDEX TO PETITIONERS’ EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME I Admin. R. ER Date 1 Document Description Doc. No. Page No. 2 11/1/2018 M.8 Registration Decision for the ER 0001 Continuation of Uses of Dicamba on Dicamba Tolerant Cotton and Soybean 11/1/2018 M.9 Approval Master Label for EPA ER 0025 Registration No. 524-617, Primary Brand Name: M1768 Herbicide Alternate Brand Name: XtendiMax® With VaporGrip® Technology 11/5/2018 M.4 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 0065 and Approved Master Label for EPA Registration No. 524-617, Primary Brand Name: M1768 Herbicide Alternate Brand Name: XtendiMax® With VaporGrip® Technology 11/5/2018 M.3 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 00121 EPA Reg Number 352-913 DuPont FeXapan Herbicide Decision 545658 and Approved Label 11/1/2018 M.5 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 0167 EPA Registration Number 7969- 345 Engenia Herbicide Decision No.
  • Geologic Map of the Southern Espanola Basin

    Geologic Map of the Southern Espanola Basin

    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SOUTHERN ESPAÑOLA BASIN, SANA FE COUNTY, NEW MEXICO By Daniel J. Koning and Adam S. Read October, 2010 OPEN-FILE REPORT 531 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS Descriptive terminology Below are descriptions of the units depicted on the geologic map. Grain sizes follow the Udden- Wentworth scale for clastic sediments (Udden, 1914; Wentworth, 1922) and are based on field estimates. Pebbles are subdivided as shown in Compton (1985). The term “clast(s)” refers to the grain size fraction greater than 2 mm in diameter and the term “matrix” refers to the particles less than 2 mm in size. Clast percentages are based on percent volume and were estimated in the field with the aid of percentage charts. Descriptions of bedding thickness follow Ingram (1954). Colors of unconsolidated sediment are based on visual comparison of dry samples to the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell Color, 1994). Soil horizon designations and descriptive terms follow those of the Soil Survey Staff (1992). Birkeland (1999), and Birkeland et al. (1991). Stages of pedogenic calcium carbonate morphology follow those of Gile et al. (1966) and Birkeland (1999). Metric units are used in this report (see Table 1 for conversion of English units to metric units). The divisions of geologic time used in this report are provided below (Table 2). Table 1. Factors for conversion of metric units to English units _______________________________________________________ Multiply By To obtain _______________________________________________________ centimeters (cm) 0.3937 inches
  • 2 CCR 601-1A [Editor’S Notes Follow the Text of the Rules at the End of This CCR Document.]

    2 CCR 601-1A [Editor’S Notes Follow the Text of the Rules at the End of This CCR Document.]

    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Commission STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS CATEGORY ASSIGNMENT SCHEDULE 2 CCR 601-1A [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _______________________________________________________________________________ Section One: Introduction 1.1 Authority Section 43-2-147, C.R.S., authorizes the Colorado Department of Transportation ("Department") to regulate vehicular access to or from the State Highway System and establish a functional classification system. The State Highway Access Code, 2 CCR 601-1, ("Access Code") implements the state statute and sets standards for the regulation of access on State Highways. The Access Code is adopted by the Transportation Commission of Colorado ("Commission"). 1.2 Purpose Section Three of the Access Code provides an access control classification system. There are eight separate categories. The State Highway Access Category Assignment Schedule ("the Schedule") assigns to each state highway segment a category pursuant to the requirements of Access Code subsection 2.2 and Section Three. This assignment adoption is by the Commission. The Commission is promulgating rules in response to requests received from local governments and CDOT related to the Schedule. 1.3 Category FR - Frontage Roads Section Two of the Schedule contains the category assignments for all sections of highways specifically assigned by the Commission. By this Schedule, all state highway frontage roads (includes service roads) are assigned category FR, except for those segments specifically listed in Section Two as requested by the local authority in accordance with Access Code subsection 3.13(1). 1.4 How To Read Section Two (A) The following explanations are given to clarify the column headings in Section Two.
  • Primitive Areas Gore Range-Eagles Nest And

    Primitive Areas Gore Range-Eagles Nest And

    OC1 LO STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS OHIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEt OCT 2 r iQ70 GORE RANGE-EAGLES NEST AND VICINITY, COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1319-C f* MINERAL RESOURCES of the GORE RANGE-EAGLES NEST PRIMITIVE AREA and VICINITY, COLORADO Crest of Gore Range and head of middle fork of Black Creek. View is westward. Mount Powell (alt 13,534 ft) is massive peak at right of cen­ ter. Eagles Nest Mountain is at far right. Duck Lake is in right foreground. Trough above right end of lake marks fault zone of north-northwest trend. Dark area on steep front of rock glacier at left in photograph is typical "wet front" suggesting ice core in rock glacier. Mineral Resources of the Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive Area and Vicinity, Summit and Eagle Counties, Colorado By OGDEN TWETO and BRUCE BRYANT, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, and by FRANK E. WILLIAMS, U.S. BUREAU OF MINES c STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1319-C An evaluation of the mineral potential of the area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 78-607129 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 ^. STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS The Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3, 1964) and the Conference Report on Senate bill 4, 88th Congress, direct the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to make mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas.
  • Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy

    Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers 2015 Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy Jordan Carper [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp Part of the Environmental Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Carper, Jordan, "Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy" (2015). Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers. 68. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/68 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LINKING ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND STEWARDSHIP IN COLORADO: LEARNING FROM THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY By JORDAN M. CARPER Undergraduate Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the University Scholar distinction and for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Biology The University of Montana Missoula, MT December 2015 Approved by: Brock Tessman, Dean The Davidson Honors College Sarah J. Halvorson, Professor Geography Carper, Jordan, B.A., December 2015 Biology Linking Environmental Restoration and Stewardship in Colorado: Learning from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy Faculty Mentor: Sarah J. Halvorson ABSTRACT The Rocky Mountain Conservancy (RMC) is a well-known nonprofit organization supporting restoration and environmental stewardship and leadership in Rocky Mountain National Park. The RMC promotes stewardship of Rocky Mountain National Park and similar lands through education and philanthropy.
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas

    Appendix C - Roadless Areas

    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
  • Annual Snowmelt and Rainfall Peak-Flow Data on Selected Foothills Region Streams, South Platte River, Arkansas River, and Colorado River Basins, Colorado

    Annual Snowmelt and Rainfall Peak-Flow Data on Selected Foothills Region Streams, South Platte River, Arkansas River, and Colorado River Basins, Colorado

    ANNUAL SNOWMELT AND RAINFALL PEAK-FLOW DATA ON SELECTED FOOTHILLS REGION STREAMS, SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, ARKANSAS RIVER, AND COLORADO RIVER BASINS, COLORADO By John G. Elliott, Robert D. Jarrett, and John L. Ebl ing U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 82-426 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ALBUQUERQUE DISTRICT; U.S. ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT; U.S. ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT; U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, Salt Lake City, Utah; COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD; and the URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Denver, Colorado Lakewood Colorado 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information For sale by: write to: Open-File Services Section Colorado District Chief Western Distribution Branch U.S. Geological Survey, MS U.S. Geological Survey, MS 306 Box 25046, Denver Federal Center Box 25^25, Denver Federal Center Lakewood, CO 80225 Denver, CO 80225 (303) 234-5888 CONTENTS Page Glossary------------------------------ ------------ ------ _- ______ _ \y Abstract-------------------------------------------------------------- ----- -j Intreduction----- ---------------------------------------------------------- -j Approach----------------------------------------- ---------- -- ----- 2 Acknowledgments--------------------------------------------------------- 2 Station selection------------------------------------------------------- --- 2 Differentiation between snowmelt- and rainfal1-produced
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas

    Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas

    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
  • National Avalanche Center 2001-2002 Season Roundup

    National Avalanche Center 2001-2002 Season Roundup

    TH E A Publication of the American Avalanche Association RE V I E W VOLUME 21, NO. 1 • FALL 2002 • US $4.95 On the web at www.a v a l a n c h e . o rg / ~ a a a p National Avalanche Center 2001-2002 Season Roundup Compiled by Janet Kellam ompiler’s note: This article is a compilation of season summaries from the network of Regional Avalanche Centers that receive funding from the US Forest C Service. In the past, we have produced this article in the spring, leaving a gaps with no information from the late spring and summer seasons. TAR is now publishing this roundup in the fall issue, in hopes of providing a more complete summary of avalanche center information. There are two additional Avalanche Centers in the NAC network: UAC/Bear River Avalanche Center-Logan and the Tahoe National Forest Avalanche Center. Their season summaries were unavailable at press time. Forest Service National Avalanche Center Those of us in the FS National Avalanche Center like to think of ourselves as the little center with the big name. The NAC has two employees, Karl Birkeland in Bozeman, Montana and Doug Abromeit in Ketchum, Idaho. The NAC, among other things, provides program guidance and support to local FS avalanche centers, facilitates technology transfer to FS field units, coordinates the FS national avalanche awareness program and manages the FS military artillery program. The past year was a good one. The NAC started the season by hosting the annual fall meeting for US avalanche centers. We held the meeting in Snowbasin, Utah and devoted one day to the nuts and bolts business of running an avalanche center and a second day to cutting edge avalanche technology including several excellent scientific presentations.
  • Stakeholders Finalize Management Plan for Upper Colorado River

    Stakeholders Finalize Management Plan for Upper Colorado River

    News Release BLM Colorado, Colorado River Valley Field Office, Kremmling Field Office U.S. Forest Service, White River National Forest July 20, 2020 Contacts: Roy Smith, Bureau of Land Management, (303) 239-3940 Kay Hopkins, White River National Forest (970) 945-3265 Stakeholders finalize management plan for Upper Colorado River GLENWOOD SPRINGS, Colo. – The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Forest Service have formally accepted the final plan from a group of Upper Colorado River stakeholders that seeks to protect recreational fishing- and boating-related values along the Upper Colorado River from Gore Canyon to lower Glenwood Canyon. The Upper Colorado River Wild and Scenic Stakeholder Group Management Plan represents more than twelve years of work by 26 entities with diverse interests on the Upper Colorado River, from municipal water providers to recreationists. “This diverse group, with seemingly different views for managing the Upper Colorado River, rolled up their sleeves and developed a plan that balances protection of the river with flexibility for water users. The work of this group serves as a model for other flow management efforts across the state,” said White River National Forest Supervisor, Scott Fitzwilliams. “The final plan addresses an arena where federal agencies have very limited authority,” said Larry Sandoval, Colorado River Valley Field Office Manager. “When our federal land management authorities are combined with this cooperative flow management effort, all of the important natural and social values in the river corridor are proactively managed.” In 2008, the stakeholder group formed as the BLM was revising its land use plans to include studies that determined which stretches of the Colorado River had specific values that make them “eligible” for protection under the 1968 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.