Singapore's Environmental Management System: Strengths and Weaknesses and Recommendations for the Years Ahead
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Waste Minimization & Recycling in Singapore
2016 World Waste to Energy City Summit Sustainable Singapore – Waste Management and Waste-to-Energy in a global city 11 May 2016 Kan Kok Wah Chief Engineer Waste & Resource Management Department National Environment Agency Singapore Outline 1. Singapore’s Solid Waste Management System 2. Key Challenges & Opportunities 3. Waste-to-Energy (WTE) and Resource Recovery 4. Next Generation WTE plants 2 Singapore Country and a City-State Small Land Area 719.1 km2 Dense Urban Setting 5.54 mil population Limited Natural Resources 3 From Past to Present From Direct landfilling From 1st waste-to-energy plant Ulu Pandan (1979) Lim Chu Kang Choa Chu Kang Tuas (1986) Tuas South (2000) Lorong Halus …to Offshore landfill Senoko (1992) Keppel Seghers (2009) 4 Overview of Solid Waste Management System Non-Incinerable Waste Collection Landfill 516 t/d Domestic Total Waste Generated 21,023 t/d Residential Trade 2% Incinerable Waste Recyclable Waste 7,886 t/d 12,621 t/d 38% 60% Ash 1,766 t/d Reduce Reuse Total Recycled Waste 12,739 t/d Metals Recovered 61% 118 t/d Industries Businesses Recycling Waste-to-Energy Non-Domestic Electricity 2,702 MWh/d 2015 figures 5 5 Key Challenges – Waste Growth and Land Scarcity Singapore’s waste generation increased about 7 folds over the past 40 years Index At this rate of waste growth… 4.00 New waste-to-energy GDP 7-10 years 3.00 Current Population: 5.54 mil Land Area: 719 km2 Semakau Landfill Population Density : 7,705 per km2 ~2035 2.00 Population 30-35 years New offshore landfill 1.00 Waste Disposal 8,402 tonnes/day (2015) -
Legal System of the Singapore's and Legal Information
Final Report Legal system of Singapore and Legal Information related to Trade and Investment in Singapore Presented to Office of the Council of State By Thailand Development Research Institute July 2016 Research Team Dr. Boonwara Sumano Chenphuengpawn Project leader Dr. Deunden Nikomborirak Advisor Napanang Ek-Akara Legal specialist Weerawan Paibunjitt-aree Researcher Nisakorn Lertpatcharanun Researcher Siraporn Tooptian Secretary and Coordinator Table of Content Page Table of Content ................................................................................................................... i List of Tables and Figures ................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1 Singapore’s Legal System: An Overview ....................................................... 1-1 1.1 Brief history of Singapore’s law ............................................................................ 1-2 1.2 Legal system ......................................................................................................... 1-9 1.3 Source of Law .....................................................................................................1-13 1.4 Hierarchy of law ..................................................................................................1-15 1.5 Court system and law interpretation ...................................................................1-19 1.6 State of legal enforcement and its complication ................................................1-28 Conclusion.................................................................................................................1-31 -
The Development of Singapore Law: a Bicentennial Retrospective1
(2020) 32 SAcLJ 804 (Published on e-First 8 May 2020) THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGAPORE LAW: A BICENTENNIAL RETROSPECTIVE1 The present article reviews (in broad brushstrokes) the status of Singapore law during its bicentennial year. It is not only about origins but also about growth – in particular, the autochthonous or indigenous growth of the Singapore legal system (particularly since the independence of Singapore as a nation state on 9 August 1965). The analysis of this growth is divided into quantitative as well as qualitative parts. In particular, the former constitutes an empirical analysis which attempts – for the very first time − to tell the development of Singapore law through numbers, building on emerging techniques in data visualisation and empirical legal studies. Andrew PHANG Judge of Appeal, Supreme Court of Singapore. GOH Yihan Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University. Jerrold SOH Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University; Co-Founder, Lex Quanta. I. Introduction 1 The present article, which reviews (in broad brushstrokes) the status of Singapore law during its bicentennial year since the founding of Singapore by Sir Stamford Raffles in 1819, is of particular significance as English law constitutes the foundation of Singapore law. The role of Raffles and his successors, therefore, could not have been more directly 1 All views expressed in the present article are personal views only and do not reflect in any way the views of the Supreme Court of Singapore, the Singapore Management University or Lex Quanta. Although this article ought, ideally, to have been published last year, the immense amount of case law that had to be analysed has led to a slight delay. -
1 Singapore's Dominant Party System
Tan, Kenneth Paul (2017) “Singapore’s Dominant Party System”, in Governing Global-City Singapore: Legacies and Futures after Lee Kuan Yew, Routledge 1 Singapore’s dominant party system On the night of 11 September 2015, pundits, journalists, political bloggers, aca- demics, and others in Singapore’s chattering classes watched in long- drawn amazement as the media reported excitedly on the results of independent Singa- pore’s twelfth parliamentary elections that trickled in until the very early hours of the morning. It became increasingly clear as the night wore on, and any optimism for change wore off, that the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) had swept the votes in something of a landslide victory that would have puzzled even the PAP itself (Zakir, 2015). In the 2015 general elections (GE2015), the incumbent party won 69.9 per cent of the total votes (see Table 1.1). The Workers’ Party (WP), the leading opposition party that had five elected members in the previous parliament, lost their Punggol East seat in 2015 with 48.2 per cent of the votes cast in that single- member constituency (SMC). With 51 per cent of the votes, the WP was able to hold on to Aljunied, a five-member group representation constituency (GRC), by a very slim margin of less than 2 per cent. It was also able to hold on to Hougang SMC with a more convincing win of 57.7 per cent. However, it was undoubtedly a hard defeat for the opposition. The strong performance by the PAP bucked the trend observed since GE2001, when it had won 75.3 per cent of the total votes, the highest percent- age since independence. -
Jaclyn L. Neo
Jaclyn L. Neo NAVIGATING MINORITY INCLUSION AND PERMANENT DIVISION: MINORITIES AND THE DEPOLITICIZATION OF ETHNIC DIFFERENCE* INTRODUCTION dapting the majority principle in electoral systems for the ac- commodation of political minorities is a crucial endeavour if A one desires to prevent the permanent disenfranchisement of those minorities. Such permanent exclusion undermines the maintenance and consolidation of democracy as there is a risk that this could lead to po- litical upheaval should the political minorities start to see the system as op- pressive and eventually revolt against it. These risks are particularly elevat- ed in the case of majoritarian systems, e.g. those relying on simple plurality where the winner is the candidate supported by only a relative majority, i.e. having the highest number of votes compared to other candidates1. Further- more, such a system, while formally equal, could however be considered substantively unequal since formal equality often fails to recognize the es- pecial vulnerabilities of minority groups and therefore can obscure the need to find solutions to address those vulnerabilities. Intervention in strict majoritarian systems is thus sometimes deemed necessary to preserve effective participation of minorities in political life to ensure a more robust democracy. Such intervention has been considered es- pecially important in societies characterized by cleavages such as race/ethnicity, religion, language, and culture, where there is a need to en- sure that minority groups are not permanently excluded from the political process. This could occur when their voting choices almost never produce the outcomes they desire or when, as candidates, they almost never receive the sufficient threshold of support to win elections. -
List of Licensed General Waste Disposal Facilities (Gwdfs) IMPORTANT NOTE: Please Contact the Companies for More Information
List of Licensed General Waste Disposal Facilities (GWDFs) IMPORTANT NOTE: Please contact the companies for more information. Since 1 August 2017, NEA began licensing General Waste Disposal Facilities (GWDFs). A GWDF is defined as a disposal facility which receives, stores, sorts, treats or processes general waste, and includes recycling facilities. Companies can apply for the Licence/Exemption via https://licence1.business.gov.sg. All general waste disposal facilities must obtain their licence or submit an exemption declaration by 31 July 2018. For more information on the GWDF Licence, please visit http://www.nea.gov.sg/energy-waste/waste-management/general-waste-disposal-facility/ Waste Stream Company Facility Address Contacts Ash Paper Plastic Sludge E-Waste Steel Slag Steel C&D waste C&D Refrigerant Scrap Metal Scrap Glass Waste Glass WoodWaste Textile Waste Textile Biomass Waste Biomass Return Concrete Return Used Cooking Oil Cooking Used Spent Copper Slag Spent Copper Mixed Recyclables Mixed Horticultural Waste Horticultural Tyre/RubberWaste Used CoffeeCapsules Used Refrigerant Cylinder/Tank Refrigerant Waste generated from the from generated Waste manufacture of electrical and manufactureofelectrical Industrial and Commercial Waste andCommercial Industrial 800 Super Waste Management 6 Tuas South Street 7 636892 [email protected]; Y Pte Ltd 62 Sungei Kadut Street 1 Sungei [email protected]; 85 Auto Trading Y Kadut Industrial Estate 729363 [email protected]; 21 Tuas West Avenue #03-01 A~Star Plastics Pte Ltd [email protected] -
Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities 469190 789811 9 Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore
Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities Inter-religious harmony is critical for Singapore’s liveability as a densely populated, multi-cultural city-state. In today’s STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS world where there is increasing polarisation in issues of race and religion, Singapore is a good example of harmonious existence between diverse places of worship and religious practices. This has been achieved through careful planning, governance and multi-stakeholder efforts, and underpinned by principles such as having a culture of integrity and innovating systematically. Through archival research and interviews with urban pioneers and experts, Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities documents the planning and governance of religious harmony in Singapore from pre-independence till the present and Communities Practices Spaces, Religious Harmony in Singapore: day, with a focus on places of worship and religious practices. Religious Harmony “Singapore must treasure the racial and religious harmony that it enjoys…We worked long and hard to arrive here, and we must in Singapore: work even harder to preserve this peace for future generations.” Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore. Spaces, Practices and Communities 9 789811 469190 Religious Harmony in Singapore: Spaces, Practices and Communities Urban Systems Studies Books Water: From Scarce Resource to National Asset Transport: Overcoming Constraints, Sustaining Mobility Industrial Infrastructure: Growing in Tandem with the Economy Sustainable Environment: -
USE THIS Singapore Scenic Driving Map OCT 30
Morning drive 77 Early afternoon drive 56 Industrial Jurong and Exploring the central catchment area km scenic Kranji countryside km The Great START POINT 7 Rie Range Road 1 Seah Im carpark • The little-known stretch • One landmark is the next to hawker centre off Dunearn Road cuts into the Bukit Timah Satellite • The prominent Singapore Drive Bukit Timah Nature Reserve. Earth Station. landmark in Seah Im Road is the 83m tower built in 1974 as part of the cable car system. Who says Singapore is too small for a good road trip? • Seah Im Hawker Centre Follow Straits Times assistant news editor Toh Yong Chuan and a bus terminal were on a 200km drive around the island to discover built in the 1980s, and they were popular meeting spots little-known spots and special lookout points. for those heading towards Sentosa by ferry. 8 Old Upper Thomson 2 “99” turns at Road Grand Prix circuit South Buona Vista Road 1961-1973 • The famously winding • Between 1961 and 1973, road runs downhill from this was the street circuit National University of for the Malaysian Grand Prix Singapore to West Coast and Singapore Grand Prix. Highway. • The 4.8km circuit has • The number of turns is catchy names like Thomson wildly exaggerated. There Mile and Devil’s Bend. are 11, not 99, turns. • A 3km stretch is now • The road is known as a one-way street to an accident hot spot and accommodate a park the 40kmh speed limit is connector. lower than that on most roads in Singapore. 9 Casuarina tree at 10 Soek Seng 1954 Bicycle Cafe Upper Seletar Reservoir • Diners can enjoy views of the • This lone casuarina tree Seletar Airport runway and parked at Upper Seletar Reservoir planes from the eatery. -
4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM
Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law. -
From Colonial Segregation to Postcolonial ‘Integration’ – Constructing Ethnic Difference Through Singapore’S Little India and the Singapore ‘Indian’
FROM COLONIAL SEGREGATION TO POSTCOLONIAL ‘INTEGRATION’ – CONSTRUCTING ETHNIC DIFFERENCE THROUGH SINGAPORE’S LITTLE INDIA AND THE SINGAPORE ‘INDIAN’ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY BY SUBRAMANIAM AIYER UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY 2006 ---------- Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Thesis Argument 3 Research Methodology and Fieldwork Experiences 6 Theoretical Perspectives 16 Social Production of Space and Social Construction of Space 16 Hegemony 18 Thesis Structure 30 PART I - SEGREGATION, ‘RACE’ AND THE COLONIAL CITY Chapter 1 COLONIAL ORIGINS TO NATION STATE – A PREVIEW 34 1.1 Singapore – The Colonial City 34 1.1.1 History and Politics 34 1.1.2 Society 38 1.1.3 Urban Political Economy 39 1.2 Singapore – The Nation State 44 1.3 Conclusion 47 2 INDIAN MIGRATION 49 2.1 Indian migration to the British colonies, including Southeast Asia 49 2.2 Indian Migration to Singapore 51 2.3 Gathering Grounds of Early Indian Migrants in Singapore 59 2.4 The Ethnic Signification of Little India 63 2.5 Conclusion 65 3 THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COLONIAL NARRATIVE IN SINGAPORE – AN IDEOLOGY OF RACIAL ZONING AND SEGREGATION 67 3.1 The Construction of the Colonial Narrative in Singapore 67 3.2 Racial Zoning and Segregation 71 3.3 Street Naming 79 3.4 Urban built forms 84 3.5 Conclusion 85 PART II - ‘INTEGRATION’, ‘RACE’ AND ETHNICITY IN THE NATION STATE Chapter -
Biodiversity at Serangoon Reservoir
Singapore’s 17 reservoirs are teeming with life, each one FOOD WEB OF Apex Primary Biodiversity at a unique underwater world boasting a rich biodiversity of sh, SERANGOON RESERVOIR predators consumers aquatic plants and other species. Cheryl Tan takes a deep Secondary Primary consumers producers Serangoon Reservoir dive into Serangoon Reservoir and reveals what it has to offer. WHAT IS FOUND IN SERANGOON RESERVOIR? Sarimbun Kranji Lower Seletar Punggol Pulau Tekong Total estimated sh Dominant Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir population size sh species Orinoco Common peacock bass PISCIVOROUS FISH snakehead Upper Serangoon 77,369 Green chromide Seletar Reservoir Total number of species of... Murai Reservoir Reservoir Native sh 6 Non-native sh 15 Upper Peirce Reservoir Poyan Lower Peirce Reservoir Reservoir Green Tengeh Jurong Lake MacRitchie Bedok Midas cichlid chromide Reservoir Reservoir Reservoir Pandan Reservoir Age of reservoir Type of reservoir Marina Unprotected/Coastal 10 years Reservoir Mozambique Zebra Javanese ricefish tilapia tilapia SURVEY TECHNIQUES Golden tank goby Boat electroshing Quetzal Mayan Used for catching shes cichlid to depths and distances Barcheek goby cichlid of up to 3m from the boat. This technique entails • Marbled gudgeon “Soon hock” Eartheater Giant placing electrodes in the cichlid gourami water that discharge pulses INVERTIVOROUS of electrical currents, which FISH OMNIVOROUS FISH rst attract and then stun the sh as they swim closer to the boat. • This helps to capture a wide range of species Vermiculated sailfish catfish across all sizes that are HERBIVOROUS otherwise FISH difcult to catch using conventional Prawns methods. Electrodes deliver current to the water Dragonfly and Gastropods Gill netting Fish tagging damselfly nymphs Used for catching pelagic shes in • The sh that are captured are individually tagged PREDATORY deeper and more open waters. -
Building an Offshore Nature Haven on Trash
CASE STUDY Building an Offshore Nature Haven on Trash Landfills are associated with toxic environments, yet the offshore landfill in Singapore has thriving marine life that people come to explore during low tides. Photo credit: Ria Tan. Singapore built an offshore landfill on Pulau Semakau primarily for waste management, but it also ensured that marine life would thrive and it could serve as a public park. Published: 27 November 2017 Overview As a fast-growing island city-state, Singapore has little space on its mainland for the rubbish its residents generate. Its innovative solution was to build one of the world’s earliest and cleanest offshore landfills—an island that today harbours flourishing ecosystems from mangroves to coral reefs. This case study was adapted from Urban Solutions of the Centre for Liveable Cities in Singapore. Challenges In 1992, one of Singapore’s last two landfill sites, a dumping ground at Lim Chu Kang in the north western region of the mainland, reached its maximum capacity and was closed. The other landfill, a 234- hectare site at Lorong Halus in the northeast, was expected to fill up by 1999. Singapore, like any small country or city with a burgeoning economy, faced a trash problem. As it grew, it generated increasing amounts of waste. In 1970, about 1,300 tonnes of solid waste was disposed of each day; by 1992, this had ballooned to about 6,000 tonnes a day. This was despite the fact that Singapore had been incinerating its trash since the late 1970s to generate energy and minimise the land required for dumps.