<<

NEW SOUTH Wendy’s Secret Garden Wendy’s

WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? STATE BY STATE NSW WHAT’S HAPPENING?

The highest canopy The lowest canopy cover in an urban LGA is cover in an urban LGA is

Average canopy cover 54% 13.7% The most significant in Hornsby . in both the City of for urban NSW is and beneficial gains and Rockdale City Council. could be made in the 26.64% Bayside City Council, down 0.83% from Cumberland Council, Council 27.47% and Liverpool in 2009. City Council.

Now that City Council has merged with Despite the canopy gains Canterbury City Council, in Bankstown City Councils the canopy figure across there has been a The most significant the amalgamated LGA will SIGNIFICANT canopy loss was be reduced, as Canterbury in Council. City Council has INCREASE 2% LESS IN HARD  13.2% CANOPY. SURFACES.

WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? NSW THE MOST & LEAST VULNERABLE

2.5 Rain Penrith City Council, Hurstville City Council, 2.0 Rain Randwick City Council Ashfield Council, Burwood Council, City of Canada 3.0 Rain Bay Council, , Newcastle City Council, Camden Council, City of City Council, Strathfield Council 3.5 Rain 1.5 Rain Hunter's Hill Council, Kogarah City Council, , , Auburn Council, Bankstown Council, Campbelltown City , Council, , Council, , Liverpool City Council

4.0 Rain 1.0 Rain Willoughby Council, Council, Leichhardt City Council, , Canterbury Council, Municipal Council, Council, Holroyd City Council, Rockdale Ctiy Council

4.5 Rain Council, Ku-ring-gai Council, , Woolhara Municipal Council

LEAST MOST VULNERABLE VULNERABLE

TOP URBAN GREENING OPPORTUNITIES:

Blacktown, Botany, Canterbury, Holroyd & Rockdale (which have all been affected by council amalgamations). -- , City of Botany Bay, Canterbury Council, Holroyd City Holroyd City Council (1), Hornsby Shire Council (4.5) Council, Rockdale City Council (1) -- - Ashfield Council (2), Leichhardt Municipal Council (4) -- Cumberland Council - Auburn Council (1.5), Holroyd City Council (1) Marrickville Council (2) -- Amalgamations between Canterbury (1) and Bankstown Councils (1.5) -- Council - Manly Council, Pittwater Council, -- Council - Auburn Council (1.5), Parramatta City Council (2) Warringah Council (3.5)

WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? New South Wales NSW SNAPSHOT

KEY STATISTICS 2009* 2016 THE GREEN KEY Tree Canopy Cover 27.47% 26.64% 0.83% Loss

In technical terms, a tree is a plant Shrub Cover 7.01% 7.2% 0.19% Gain over six metres, while a shrub is Grass Cover 25.73% 23.36% 2.37% Loss under six metres. However, for an accurate comparison to our Hard Surface 39.8% 42.8% 3.0% Increase previous mapping report, ‘Where are all the trees?’, we have used the following definitions: SHRUB & TREE CANOPY COVER CHANGES IN NSW LGAS 2009-2016

Trees Anything that looks like a tree from 15 % above, distinguished from shrubs by the 10 % shadows cast.

5 % Shrub

Landscaped vegetation 0 % as well as bushland shrubs, crops and -5 % grapevines.

Grass -10 % Cleared road sides, lawns, pastures, sites cleared for development and sporting grounds. 4 % Hard surfaces 2 % Asphalt, buildings, car parks, footpaths, 0 % sandy beaches, train -2 %

lines, rocky coastlines -4 % and water. -6 %

-8 %

SIGNIFICANT INCREASE NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE SIGNIFICANT DECREASE SHRUB CHANGE

* From ‘Benchmarking ’s Urban Tree Canopy: An i-Tree Assessment’, Final Report (2014) WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? New South Wales SyNSWdNSWney, N –S WSYDNEY

URBAN HEAT ISLAND MAPPING An urban heat island is an area that heats up more than – and stays hotter than – its surrounding areas due to human impact of hard surfaces and development. Colours are used below to differentiate intensity of urban heat islands.

Legend

Hottest Areas

Hottest 16%

Hottest 8%

Hottest 2.5%

O 0 5.5 11Kilometers Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, Map by: Alex Saunders Date: 23/05/2017 METI, Esri (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community SyNSWdNSWney, N –S WSYDNEY

URBAN HEAT CONTINENTS Contiguous areas of urban heat spots or islands show a phenomenon more akin to an urban heat continent than a spot or island. The colours differentiate the various heat continents.

O 0 5.5 11Kilometers

Map by: Alex Saunders Date: 23/05/2017 Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community NeNSWwNSWcastl e–, N NEWCASTLESW

URBAN HEAT ISLAND MAPPING An urban heat island is an area that heats up more than – and stays hotter than – its surrounding areas due to human impact of hard surfaces and development. Colours are used below to differentiate intensity of urban heat islands.

Legend

Hottest Areas

Hottest 16%

Hottest 8%

Hottest 2.5%

O 0 1 2Kilometers Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, Map by: Alex Saunders Date: 23/05/2017 METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community NeNSWwNSWcastl e–, N NEWCASTLESW

URBAN HEAT CONTINENTS Contiguous areas of urban heat spots or islands show a phenomenon more akin to an urban heat continent than a spot or island. The colours differentiate the various heat continents.

O 0 1 2Kilometers

Map by: Alex Saunders Date: 23/05/2017 Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community NSW THE GOOD NEWS

The best tree canopy gains have been made in Bankstown Council (4% gain) and the (3.6% gain).

WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? New South Wales NSW COUNCIL COMMENTS

PENRITH CITY COUNCIL

Using data from 2011 Penrith City Council undertook an in-depth study across the Penrith LGA. This analysis allowed us to identify priority areas to focus future urban greening and cooling projects. These areas are St Marys, Penrith, Kingswood, Cranebrook and Glenmore Park.

MELISSA MCMANUS PARKS DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL OFFICE NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL CARMEL HAMILTON SUSTAINABILITY COORDINATOR Since 1997, North Sydney Council has strived to undertake regular detailed canopy analysis. LIDAR assessment in 2008 reported 34% canopy cover and in 2014, 31% canopy cover. There was no analysis in 2016 due to bad weather but the next round of measurement SUTHERLAND SHIRE COUNCIL is due to be conducted in Spring 2017 and will be carried out in conjunction with City of Sydney. Once this additional data has The snapshot should be read within a broader context to refine been measured it will be incorporated into a review of the Urban future action. For example, the intersection as a priority area is in Forestry Strategy which has been in place since 2011. fact quite treed in its local context. The heat detected is likely to Currently, key greening opportunities are aligned with the snapshot be coming from the Miranda centre and large Westfield shopping findings and are focused in and around St Leonards – an area centre on Kiora Road. Council has an active Green Streets identified as a hotspot. North Sydney Council has been actively Program designed to maintain tree canopy in the future in the planting out carparks over the past five years, and has experienced face of increased densification. good rates of tree growth. The North Sydney Council Urban Forest The Green Streets Program seeks to grow the next generation Strategy is accessible to the public via the website. of canopy trees in the public domain to offset those lost from private land with four new trees being planted for each tree removed in Sutherland Shire. Since 2012, over 7,000 trees have been planted in the public domain through this project. In Miranda centre, Syncarpia glomulifera have been planted in the

MARK CARLON Kingsway and species from the Sydney Turpentine Iron Bark MANAGER STRATEGIC Forest planted in surrounding streets. PLANNING

WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? New South Wales NSW COUNCIL COMMENTS

KARENNE JURD ASSET PROGRAM COORDINATOR, ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL

Overall, there is general alignment between the City established urban trees, our Urban Forest Policy (2008), of Newcastle’s (Council) understanding of hotspots Development Control Plans and Technical Guidance and what the RMIT mapping has identified. However, Manuals, maintenance schedules, community requests, it should be noted that the analysis of hard sand that water sensitive urban design, microclimate modifications includes ‘water’ needs to moderated in areas such as and the location of tree vacancy sites across the LGA. the Newcastle LGA, which comprises a substantial Council’s potential planting areas include: area of small and large wetlands. For example, the substantial constructed wetland at Sandgate needs Merewether, The Junction – Corlette, Frederick, Kemp, to be incorporated in such analysis when projecting Kilgour, Patrick and Buchanan Streets. the performance of this light industrial area. As major Mayfield East – whole retrofit, and Stevenson Park, hotspots identified in industrial areas are on private Mayfield West. land, Council is working to build partnerships to address these hotspots through proactively targeting street tree Kotara – Parkway Avenue and Howell Street, planting such as the recent planting of the Beresfield light Kulliabah Reserve industrial areas. Beresfield – Local Centre, Beresford and Landor Street. Each year, as part of the annual Street and Park Tree Wallsend – Local Centre, Wallsend Reserve and road Renewal Program, Council plants on average 1,100 trees. rehabilitation sites. Approximately 90% of these are street trees, with the remaining planted within park open space. Council’s Hamilton – Denison and Samdon Streets. approach to tree planting is a strategic one that takes into account our GIS tree asset inventory of 113,377 new and

WHERE SHOULD ALL THE TREES GO? New South Wales WANT TO KNOW MORE?

Visit 202020vision.com.au/research

20% MORE GREEN SPACES IN URBAN AREAS BY 2020