State of the Environment Report 2011-2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State of the Environment Report 2011-2012 NORTHERN SYDNEY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF COUNCILS STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT 2011-2012 “End of Term” NSROC State of the Environment Reports 2008-2012 NORTHERN SYDNEY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF COUNCILS Comprising the Councils of Hornsby, Hunter’s Hill, Ku-ring-gai, Lane Cove, North Sydney, Ryde and Willoughby STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT 2011 – 2012 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE NSROC has now produced Regional State of the Environment reports for eight years. This reflects both the recognition that many environmental issues impact beyond council borders and that our member councils are committed to cooperative approaches to achieve improved environmental outcomes. The 2011-2012 NSROC Regional State of the Environment Report is also an End of Term Report. It provides updates on key data and highlights through case studies, the relevant regional and council initiatives relating to the environment in the 2011-2012 financial year. As per the 2010-2011 report, an “at a glance” comparator of environmental data across councils is designed as a quick reference guide. As an End of Term Report, where possible, trend data is presented for the four years 2008 to 2012. Councillor Nick Berman Hornsby Shire Council President of Northern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils September 2012 HORNSBY HUNTER’S HILL KU-RING-GAI LANE COVE NORTH SYDNEY RYDE WILLOUGHBY Mayor Berman Mayor Hoopmann Mayor Cross Mayor Gaffney Mayor McCaffery Mayor Etmekdjian Mayor Reilly Councillor Delegate Councillor Delegate Councillor Delegate Councillor Delegate Councillor Delegate Councillor Delegate Councillor Delegate Robert Browne Richard Quinn Jennifer Anderson Pam Palmer Stephen Barbour Sarkis Yedelian Barry Thompson 1 NORTHERN SYDNEY REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF COUNCILS CONTENTS Key Findings ..............................................................................................................4 At a glance summary ..................................................................................................5 Acronyms ..................................................................................................................6 Introduction .......................................................................................................7 The NSROC region .....................................................................................................7 State of environment reporting ....................................................................................8 Why a regional SoE report? .........................................................................................8 This report .................................................................................................................8 1 Towards Sustainability...............................................................................9 Sustainability goals and measures .............................................................................10 Community consultation and corporate action .............................................................17 2 Human Settlement ..................................................................................20 Urban development and growth .................................................................................21 Population distribution ..............................................................................................24 Heritage ..................................................................................................................26 Non-Aboriginal heritage .............................................................................................27 Transport .................................................................................................................29 Delivering sustainable transport .................................................................................30 Waste .....................................................................................................................33 Noise ......................................................................................................................35 Energy ....................................................................................................................37 Water .....................................................................................................................41 Community health ....................................................................................................43 3 Bushland .......................................................................................................46 Flora and fauna .......................................................................................................50 Open space .............................................................................................................51 4 Water ..............................................................................................................53 5 Climate Change ..........................................................................................58 Air quality ................................................................................................................61 6 Landscape ....................................................................................................63 Mapping and coastal landscape initiatives ..................................................................65 Appendix ............................................................................................................68 Environmental Extracts from Councils’ Community Strategy Plans ..................................69 2 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT 2011 – 2012 LIST OF CASE STUDIES CHAPTER 1 – TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY .............................................9 Hunter’s Hill Council – Rethinking Waste ....................................................................17 City of Ryde Council – World Environment Day 2011 ....................................................18 Hornsby Shire Council – Ready Set Grow Schools Program ...........................................18 Willoughby City Council – Sustainable Buildings The Concourse .....................................19 CHAPTER 2 – HUMAN SETTLEMENT ......................................................20 Hornsby Shire Council – Epping Town Centre Study ......................................................23 Hornsby Shire Council – Heritage Review ....................................................................27 North Sydney Council – Commuity Garden ..................................................................28 City of Ryde Council – Macquarie Park Transport Management Association .....................30 City of Ryde Council – Personal Mobility Devices ..........................................................31 Lane Cove Council – Riding Around Lane Cove ............................................................32 North Sydney Council – Electric Bikes ........................................................................32 Hornsby Shire Council – Highrise Unit Waste Management Program ...............................34 Willoughby City Council – The Coolest Parking in Town ..................................................39 City of Ryde Council – Home, Waste and Sustainability Advisory Service 2012 ................40 Lane Cove Council – Walk Around the World ...............................................................44 Hunter’s Hill Council – Tarban Creek Cycleway .............................................................44 North Sydney Council – The Coal Loader Community Garden and Community Health .......45 CHAPTER 3 – BUSHLAND ..........................................................................46 City of Ryde Council – River to River Corridors Project 2010-2013 ................................48 Ku-ring- gai – Canopy Connect ..................................................................................49 Lane Cove Council – Backyard Habitat Program ...........................................................50 CHAPTER 4 – WATER ...................................................................................53 Hornsby Shire Council – Epping Stormwater Harvesting Project .....................................56 Ku-ring-gai Council – Rehabilitation of South Branch of Cowan Creek ............................57 Hornsby Shire Council – Bioretention Stormwater Treatment Basin ................................57 CHAPTER 5 – Climate CHANGE .............................................................58 Ku-ring-gai Council – Climate Wise Communities .........................................................59 City of Ryde Council – Low Carbon Growth Plan for the Macquarie Park Precinct .............60 Willoughby City Council – Carbon Management ...........................................................61 CHAPTER 6 – LANDSCAPE ........................................................................63 City of Ryde Council – Strangers Creek Rehabilitation & Bioretention Basin ....................64 Ku-ring-gai Council – Biodiversity and Riparian Lands Mapping ......................................65 North Sydney Council – Urban Forest Strategy ..............................................................66 APPENDICES – Environmental Extracts from Councils’ Community Strategy Plans and other key environmental documents ...............................................................68 • Hornsby Shire Council ........................................................................................69
Recommended publications
  • Infrastructure Funding Performance Monitor
    UDIA NSW | 2020 Infrastructure Funding Performance Monitor $2.7 billion is currently held as a restricted asset by Councils for the delivery of infrastructure • The current total balance of contributions held across the Greater Sydney megaregion is $2.7 billion, with the average amount held by a Council sitting at $56 million. • Every year new housing contributes almost $900 million to local infrastructure, Executive roads, stormwater, open space and community facilities across the Greater Sydney megaregion through the infrastructure charging framework. It is expected Summary that this infrastructure is built with the funds that are paid. • However, only 64% of the contributions that are paid for were spent in the last three years. Average Total Expenditure Total Income Balance E/I ($’000) ($’000) ($’000) Total 0.64 $650,679 $876,767 $2,653,316 Contributions Under a s7.11 0.85 $564,670 $711,912 $2,330,289 or s7.12 Under a s7.4 0.62 $41,640 $124,180 $259,501 The amount of unspent funding has increased over the past three years • Since FY16 total unspent contributions have increased 33% from $1.98 billion to over $2.65 billion. Executive • In the last year alone unspent contributions increased by 7.8%, or almost $191 million. Summary • Local Government must resolve local issues to ensure that infrastructure is actually provided on the ground. If necessary, the State Government should step-in to support Councils get infrastructure on the ground. Increased funding does not correlate to increased infrastructure delivery • The scatter graphs here show an extremely weak relationship between cash held and expenditure ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Decision Making and Independent Panels
    The Henry Halloran Trust Research Report Council Decision Making and Independent Panels Yolande Stone A Practitioner-in-Residence Project A review of the Evolution of Panels and their Contribution to Improving Development Assessment in NSW ISBN: 978-0-9925289-1-1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This material was produced with funding from Henry Halloran Trust at the University of Sydney. The University gratefully acknowledges the important role of the Trust in promoting scholarship, innovation and research in town planning, urban development and land management. The University of Sydney, through the generous gift of Warren Halloran, has established the Henry Halloran Trust in honour of Henry Halloran, who was an active advocate for town planning in the first half of the twentieth century. He introduced and implemented new concepts of town planning in the many settlements he established, as part of h is contribution to nation building. The objective of the trust is to promote scholarship, innovation and research in town planning, urban development and land management. This will be achieved through collaborative, cross- disciplinary and industry-supported research that will support innovative approaches to urban and regional policy, planning and development issues. The Trust’s ambition is to become a leading voice and advocate for the advancement of liveable cities, thriving urban communities and sustainable development. For further information: http://www.sydney.edu.au/halloran I would also like to acknowledge and thank Professor Peter Phibbs Director, Henry Halloran Trust and Dr Michael Bounds, Coordinator of the Practitioner in Residence Program, Henry Halloran Trust for their guidance and support. I would also like to thank council staff, panel members and development assessment experts who provided valuable input into my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Item ENV009-20 Georges River Council Car Parking Strategy
    Parking Georges River Car Parking Strategy Strategy For Georges River Council Report; 31 July 2018 Document Control Georges River Car Parking Strategy, Parking Strategy Report Issue Date Issue Details Author Reviewed For the attention of 1 18.05.2018 Draft HL/MS/AU/DK CL/AM Harkirat Singh 2 07/06/18 Revised Draft HL AU/CL Harkirat Singh Issue 3 05/07/18 Final DK/HL MS/AU Harkirat Singh 4 27/07/18 Updated Final DK/HL MS/AU Harkirat Singh 5 27/07/18 Updated Final DK/HL MS/AU Harkirat Singh 6 31/07/18 Updated Final DK/HL AU Harkirat Singh Contact Cristina Lynn +61 2 8920 0800 +61 410 611 137 cristina.lynn@ptcconsultants.co Mary Seymour +61 2 8920 0800 mary.seymour@ptcconsultants.co Abdullah Uddin +61 2 8920 0800 +61 425 478 650 abdullah.uddin@ptcconsultants.co COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE The information contained in this document, including any intellectual property rights arising from designs developed and documents created, is confidential and proprietary to ptc. This document may only be used by the person/organisation to whom it is addressed for the stated purpose for which it is provided and must not be imparted to or reproduced, in whole or in part, by any third person without the prior written approval of a ptc. authorised representative. ptc. reserves all legal rights and remedies in relation to any infringement of its rights in respect of its intellectual property and/or confidential information. © 2018 ptc. Suite 102, 506 Miller Street Cammeray NSW 2062 info@ptcconsultants.co t + 61 2 8920 0800 ptcconsultants.co Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Asterolasia Elegans, Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), Sydney
    National Recovery Plan Asterolasia elegans © Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), 2011 This work is copyright. However, material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW). Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) 59-61 Goulburn Street (PO Box A290) Sydney South NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (information & publications requests) TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Fax: (02) 9995 5999 Email: info@environment.nsw.gov.au Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for Asterolasia elegans are best directed to: The Asterolasia elegans Recovery Plan Coordinator Biodiversity Conservation Section, Metro Branch Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) PO Box 1967 Hurstville NSW 2220 Phone: 02 9585 6905 Cover illustrator: Reproduced from NSW Flora Online (2006) with permission, © Royal Botanic Gardens & Domain Trust, Sydney Australia. This plan should be cited as follows: Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) (2011), Recovery Plan for Asterolasia elegans, Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), Sydney. ISBN 978 1 74122 903 5 October 2008 DECC 2008/391 Printed on recycled paper Disclaimer This recovery plan sets out the actions necessary to stop the decline of, and support the recovery of, the listed threatened species or ecological community. The Australian Government is committed to acting in accordance with the plan and to implementing the plan as it applies to Commonwealth areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Responses to Urban Consolidation Policy: Meeting Housing Targets in Northern Sydney
    Local Government Responses to Urban Consolidation Policy: Meeting Housing Targets in Northern Sydney THESIS PROJECT Planning and Urban Development Program The Faculty of the Built Environment University of New South Wales Lauren Baroukh 3158821 - i - ABSTRACT Urban consolidation is the central housing policy guiding future residential development in the existing urban areas of Sydney. In accordance with the Sydney Metropolitan Strategy and subsequently elaborated in various Subregional Strategies, councils are required to achieve housing targets and accommodate higher density housing within their Local Government Areas. This thesis examines how councils are implementing these targets and achieving the urban consolidation objectives defined within strategic planning documents. It provides an analysis of council responses, primarily through the rezoning of land within revised Local Environmental Plans and local housing strategies. The thesis examines the factors which councils consider when selecting sites for higher density housing, such as proximity to town centres and public transport, the capacity of existing infrastructure and services, preserving the character of low density areas and determining appropriate building heights. The research indicates that councils are beginning to implement the housing targets and achieving many of the objectives suggested within the Sydney Metropolitan Strategy. In particular, the thesis identifies the issue of infrastructure provision as requiring further consideration by councils and state agencies. Higher density housing within existing urban areas needs to be appropriately located and planned in a way that responds to the unique characteristics of the locality. - ii - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks go to Christine Steinmetz for her valuable advice, guidance and support which is much appreciated. I would also like to thank the interviewees for their time and insights which have made a valuable contribution to this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornsby (Part) and Ku-Ring-Gai 1 Local Government Boundaries Commission
    Local Government Boundaries Commission 1. Summary of Local Government Boundaries Commission comments The Boundaries Commission has reviewed the Delegate’s Report on the proposed merger of Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council to determine whether it shows the legislative process has been followed and the Delegate has taken into account all the factors required under the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act). The Commission has assessed that: the Delegate’s Report shows that the Delegate has undertaken all the processes required by section 263 of the Act, the Delegate’s Report shows that the Delegate has adequately considered all the factors required by section 263(3) of the Act, and the Delegate’s recommendation in relation to the proposed merger is supported by the Delegate’s assessment of the factors. 2. Summary of the merger proposal On 6 January 2016, the Minister for Local Government referred a proposal to merge the local government areas of Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council to the Acting Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government for examination and report under the Act. The following map shows the proposed new council area (shaded in green). Proposed merger of Hornsby (part) and Ku-ring-gai 1 Local Government Boundaries Commission The proposal would have the following impacts on population across the two councils. Council 2016 2031 Hornsby Shire Council 171,400 201,750 Ku-ring-gai Council 124,700 151,100 New Council 296,100 352,850 Source: NSW Department of Planning & Environment, 2014 NSW Projections (Population, Household and Dwellings).
    [Show full text]
  • End of Term Report 2012 - 2017
    End of Term Report 2012 - 2017 A Report against the Community Strategic Plan, Ryde 2025 Updated to include 2016/17 year Contents Introduction 3 Our City 4 Our Challenges and Oportunities 5 Our Vision 7 Our Mission 7 Our Values 7 Our Outcomes 8 Progress Report: A City of Liveable Neighbourhoods 9 Progress Report: A City of Wellbeing 15 Progress Report: A City of Prosperity 24 Progress Report: A City of Environmental Sensitivity 28 Progress Report: A City of Connections 37 Progress Report: A City of Harmony and Culture 43 Progress Report: A City of Progressive Leadership 50 Future Directions for a new Community Strategic Plan 59 2 Introduction The End of Council Term Report (2012-2017) has been prepared to meet the Integrated Planning and Reporting requirements of the Local Government Act 1993. It is a report from the outgoing Council to the community on its achievements and effectiveness over the past four years in meeting the objectives of its Community Strategic Plan - Ryde 2025. The legislative purpose of the report is to inform the review and update of the Community Strategic Plan by the incoming Council. This report is organised and presented in the seven outcomes of Ryde 2025 that include; A City of Liveable Neighbourhood A City of Wellbeing A City of Prosperity A City of Environmental Sensitivity A City of Harmony and Culture A City of Progressive Leadership Against each of these outcomes this report outlines: Council’s Goals and Strategies for meeting each of the seven outcomes What were the key challenges that formed these outcomes Tracking Council’s progress in helping the community achieve the outcomes in Ryde 2025 by highlighting key achievements by Council and our partners from 2012-2017 Council’s performance against the set targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Area Emergency Declared for Greater Sydney
    Hi all, Please see the below email which was sent to all NSW providers and services this afternoon. Thank you. The Digital Communication Team, Early Childhood and Child Care. Local Area Emergency declared for Greater Sydney On 26 June the NSW Government implemented a stay at home direction for people in Greater Sydney, Blue Mountains, Central Coast, Wollongong and Shell Harbour Local Government Areas (LGAs) in response to the evolving COVID-19 situation. Restrictions apply to regional and rural NSW. Details can be found on the NSW Government’s COVID- 19 response website. In response, we’ve declared a Local Area Emergency (LAE) for the period 26 June to 9 July 2021 for services located in the following LGAs in New South Wales: City of Sydney, Municipality of Woollahra, City of Randwick, Municipality of Waverley, Bayside Council, Blacktown City Council, Blue Mountains City Council, Municipality of Burwood, Camden Council, Central Coast Council, City of Campbelltown, City of Canada Bay, City of Canterbury-Bankstown, Cumberland City Council, City of Fairfield, George’s River Council, City of Hawkesbury, Hornsby Shire, Municipality of Hunter’s Hill, Inner West Council, Ku-ring-gai Council, Lane Cove Council, City of Liverpool, Mosman Council, North Sydney Council, Northern Beaches Council, City of Parramatta, City of Penrith, City of Ryde, Shellharbour City Council, Municipality of Strathfield, Sutherland Shire, The Hills Shire, City of Willoughby, and Wollongong City Council. Early childhood education and care services, including vacation care, can continue to operate across NSW. Under the stay at home rules, accessing child care is considered a reasonable excuse to leave home.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Transport Reference Group
    NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL Sustainable Transport Reference Group Report ST04 - 24 June 2013 Attachments: 1. Minutes 21 February 2013 SUBJECT: North Shore Regional Pedestrian and Bicycle Committee AUTHOR: Michaela Kemp, Traffic Engineer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 27th meeting of the North Shore Regional Pedestrian and Bicycle Committee was held on 21 February 2013 at Lane Cove Council. The minutes are attached The 28th meeting was held on 6 June 2013 at Hunters Hill Council. Attachments to the minutes can be provided on request. RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT the minutes of the 27th meeting of the North Shore Regional Pedestrian and Bicycle Committee be received. Signed: Endorsed by: Director, Engineering & Property Services Final Minutes of the 27th North Shore Regional Pedestrian and Bicycle Committee Meeting Meeting location: Meeting Room 1, Lane Cove Library, Library Walk, Lane Cove Meeting date and time: Thursday 21st February, 10.30am – 12.30pm Attendees Alister Sharp – Bike North Stella Stefan - North Sydney Council Ian Napier – Walking Volunteers Russ Webber – North Shore Bicycle Group Warren Yates – Mosman ATWG Andrew Fraser – Member of NSC Active Transport Val Stamper – Lane Cove Council David Innes – Hunters Hill Council Stephanie Bullock – Willoughby Council Tim Sullivan – Lane Cove Council Joseph Piccoli – Ku-ring-gai Council Caroline Minogue – Bike North Michelle Carter – Pittwater Council Tony Arnold – Bicycle NSW Mario Pace - RMS ITEMS; Item 1 Notification of apologies: Caroline Kades – Warringah Council Veronique Marchandeau – North Sydney Council Phil Jenkyn – Walking Volunteers Carolyn New – Bike North Marc Gold – Lane Cove Council Vanessa Moskal – Warringah Council David Bell Item 2 Confirmation of previous minutes Previous meeting minutes confirmed – 18th October Moved: Warren Yates Seconded: Russ Weber Item 3 Jamie Seeleither from Outdoor Counters Australia gave a presentation on Eco Counters.
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Cover River Estuary – Understanding the Resource
    Response to request for Quotation No: COR-RFQ-21/07 Provision of Consultancy Services to Prepare a Community Education Program: Lane Cover River Estuary – Understanding the Resource This is Our Place and a River runs through it "Just as the key to a species' survival in the natural world is its ability to adapt to local habitats, so the key to human survival will probably be the local community. If we can create vibrant, increasingly autonomous and self-reliant local groupings of people that emphasise sharing, cooperation and living lightly on the Earth, we can avoid the fate warned of by Rachel Carson and the world scientists and restore the sacred balance of life.1" 1 David Suzuki. The Sacred Balance (1997) Allen & Unwin p.8 The TITC Partnership see this quote from David Suzuki as the basis for our work on this project. 2008_02_15_Response to RFQ_Ryde_final Page 1 of 33 CONTENTS The Project Team TITC Partnership........................................................................................................... 3 Understanding of Scope of Works ................................................................................................................. 4 Program Objectives................................................................................................................................... 4 Proposed Package Elements .................................................................................................................... 4 The Catchment Community......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lisa Trueman CV.Docx
    Lisa Trueman—Senior Associate Lisa Trueman, GML Senior Associate, is an architect and heritage consultant with over 25 years’ experience in built heritage conservation, including 15 years as a heritage adviser in local government. Lisa specialises in providing design advice and statutory guidance to government agencies, architects and developers in order to facilitate outcomes based on heritage best practice. Lisa has extensive knowledge of conservation practice and heritage legislation at both local and state level. She has worked on many local government heritage studies and reviews and provided advice on, and assessment of, the heritage impact of proposed works to numerous heritage listed places. Lisa has over 15 years’ experience as an independent expert witness on heritage issues in the Land and Environment Court of NSW (LEC), representing local councils and government agencies. Her LEC expertise includes Section 34 conciliation conferences, provision of joint reports and expert evidence at hearings. Lisa’s work at GML involves the provision of heritage advice and the Qualifications assessment of heritage impact for a range of projects, from minor additions Master in Heritage Conservation, University of to large scale developments, planning proposals and strategic planning Sydney (Currently Undertaking) studies. Prior to joining GML, Lisa worked as a heritage adviser at North Bachelor of Architecture (Honours), University of Sydney Sydney Council, Manly Council and Hornsby Council and in private practice Bachelor of Science (Architecture), University of as a design and conservation architect. Sydney Key Experience Heritage Studies Heritage Assessment Expert Witness City of Ryde Heritage Review—Project 6–8 Hayes Street, Neutral Bay, Heritage Expert Witness in numerous matters in the NSW Manager—Client: City of Ryde Council, Assessment—Project Director—Client: North Land and Environment Court, participating in 2018–2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornsby Shire Council
    HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL A shire of opportunity 1 Hornsby Shire Council: a shire of opportunity Hornsby Shire Council A shire of opportunity The social, generational, economic However by understanding the and demographic trends impacting emerging trends, we can be more Hornsby Shire are creating not prepared for the changes and so only new challenges but great rather than becoming defensive or opportunities. Unprecedented blasé we can respond to the shifts, change can sometimes lead to influence the trends and shape the change fatigue where the response future. This report outlines ten of can be to become worried about the top trends that currently define change, or equally it can lead to the Hornsby Local Government Area change apathy which can create an and which are shaping this shire of indifference to change. opportunity. Top 10 trends 1. Growing population, increasing densification 2. Ageing population, transitioning generations 3. Educational attainment, professional employment 4. Entrepeneurship for small and home-based businesses 5. Property ownership and investment growth 6. Stable workforce, lower unemployment 7. Mobile lifestyle enabled though public transport and cars 8. A home for families and the next generations 9. A place of cultural and language diversity 10. The lifestyle shire 2 Hornsby Shire Council: a shire of opportunity Hornsby Shire Council A demographic snapshot # Suburb Population Median Age Total population 1 Hornsby 20,484 37 168,614 2 Cherrybrook 18,347 41 3 Epping 13,837 38 4 Beecroft - 10,445 44 Cheltenham
    [Show full text]