ULYSSES S. GRANT His Whiskey History by Jack Sullivan Special to Bottles and Extras Much Has Been Said and Written About Would Be of the Most Service to the Ulysses S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ULYSSES S. GRANT His Whiskey History by Jack Sullivan Special to Bottles and Extras Much Has Been Said and Written About Would Be of the Most Service to the Ulysses S Bottles and Extras January-February 2007 59 ULYSSES S. GRANT His Whiskey History By Jack Sullivan Special to Bottles and Extras Much has been said and written about would be of the most service to the Ulysses S. Grant, the great Civil War country. general and later two-term President. In ”Grant is a drunkard,” asserted his story the subject of whiskey powerful and influential politicians to the comes up frequently. History tells us that President at the White House time after he had a considerable problem with time; “he is not himself half the alcohol throughout much of his life. time; he can’t be relied upon, it is a shame Despite that affliction, he clearly was to have such a man in command of the Union’s most effective military leader an army.” and he remains one of the most ”So Grant gets drunk, does he?” queried interesting and impressive figures of Lincoln, addressing himself to one American history. [Figure 1] of the particularly active detractors of the soldier. “Yes, he does, and I Figure 2: 1955 Old Crow Ad: Grant’s Particular Brand can prove it,” was the reply. Houston & Webster Grant’s particular brand of whiskey has Well,” returned Lincoln, with the Old Crow has always trumpeted its become a matter of historical interest faintest suspicion of a twinkle in his historical connections including depicting because of a purported comment by eye, “you needn’t waste your time getting important figures as customers. The ad President Lincoln during a crucial proof; you just find out, to oblige shown here [Figure 2] purports to show point in the Civil War. The story appears me, what brand of whiskey Grant drinks, Texas hero Sam Houston sharing its first to have been told by Col. because I want to send a barrel of it bourbon with famous orator Daniel Alexander K. McClure, a Lincoln friend, to each one of my generals.” Webster. in his 1901 book, “Abe Lincoln’s That ended the crusade against Grant, Old Crow also claimed Grant as a Yarns and Stories.” It goes this way: so far as the question of drinking was customer. Most biographers of Grant are Lincoln was not a man of impulse, and concerned. skeptical about such claims and have did nothing upon the spur of the While the validity of the Lincoln story decided that it is impossible to know what moment; action with him was the result has been challenged by more recent brand of whiskey Grant as general or of deliberation and study. He took historians, the controversy has not President actually favored. Biographers nothing for granted; he judged men by dampened speculation through the years similarly are unsure about the role Grant their performances and not their about what type of strong drink Grant as President may have played in what speech. actually did favor. It is clear that he came to be known as “The Great Whiskey If a general lost battles, Lincoln lost was partial to whiskey. In Grant’s day, Ring.” confidence in him; if a commander however, whiskey was a potable that was successful, Lincoln put him where he covered a wide spectrum of flavors, A National Scandal ingredients, and differing alcoholic The exposure of the Great Whiskey content. Moreover, at that time brand Ring of 1875 rocked Washington D.C. and names were just beginning to be indeed the entire country like few national advertised and known. Among the earliest scandals before or since. On May 10, was Old Crow, a Kentucky bourbon. Federal agents stormed into the offices of nine St. Louis distilleries, seized illicit Old Crow makes a claim whiskey and box loads of records, and In his book, The Social History of arrested their proprietors. Simultaneous Bourbon, Gerald Carson recounts that arrests occurred in Cincinnati, Milwaukee during one night during the long and and Chicago. Ultimately, indictments were stressful siege of Vicksburg, General issued against 240 whiskey-makers, Grant said to his aides: “See here, before government officials and others; 110 were we go to bed, let’s have a nightcap. Stewart found guilty. Most of them went to jail. [an aide] has got some prime Old Crow Thus ended a massive scheme to defraud whiskey around here somewhere.” Stewart the U.S. of excise taxes on distilled spirits. got the bottle and then watched as Grant The fallout from the raids would roil the filled a large goblet with Old Crow whiskey Nation for months and reach right into the and tossed it down. ”It was a whopping big White House. Shown here is a bottle shaped Figure 1: Ulysses S. Grant as President drink...” to look like a two story log cabin with a 60 January-February 2007 Bottles and Extras Certainly General Babcock found her enchanting. In St. Louis to collect a share of kickbacks from local whiskey men, he met her through a friend and the two almost immediately began an affair. Babcock’s visits to St. Louis to pick up graft payments for himself and, some have alleged, the Republican Party, became more frequent. He may even have gathered a few bottles of contraband whiskey and given them to the President. Back in Washington, he repeatedly referred to “The Sylph” in messages to cronies that eventually became public through court records and titillated the Nation. Because Babcock was a close colleague of Grant, the press and public began to ask: “What did the President know and when did he know it?” — the same Figure 5: General Orville Babcock questions that later would fuel speculation Figure 3 (L): Old Cabin Bitters Bottle Sylph.” This was the name given to her about Richard Nixon in the Figure 4 (R): Kelly’s “Proprietary” by one of the conspirators, General Orville Watergate scandal. Revenue Stamp E. Babcock [Figure 5], who also peaked roof. It is a Kelly’s Old Cabin happened to be a White House aide, President Grant Testifies Bitters [Figure 3]. Examples have sold to personal secretary to President Grant. Grant was in his second term as bottle collectors in recent months at prices A contemporary observer described Ms. President when news broke about the approaching $2,000. Kelly was James B. Hawkins this way: “Her form was petit Whiskey Ring. His Secretary of the Kelly of New York, a whiskey man, who is and yet withal, a plumpness and Treasury, Benjamin H. Bristow [Figure 7] shown on a self-produced “proprietary” development which made her a being whose discovered that in St. Louis alone at least revenue stamp [Figure 4]. This is an ironic tempting luscious deliciousness was $1.2 million in tax revenues annually were touch since it was an attempt to irresistible.... She was the essence of not accounted for. The total cost of the evade federal revenues on alcohol that lay grace, distilled from the buds of perfection, scam to the U.S. approached $3 million a at the heart of the Great Whiskey and with a tongue on which the year at a time when fifty cents would buy a Ring. oil of vivacity and seduction never ceased hefty meal. Knowing that the Kelly also had a St. Louis address and running; she was indeed a sylph and corruption involved Republic political a partnership there with a man named a siren, whose presence was like the flavor appointees, Bristow discussed the John H. Garnhart (sometimes spelled of the poppy mixed with the investigation with Grant who told him to “Garnhard”). Garnhart began a wholesale perfumes of Araby.” While she might not proceed with vigor without regard to liquor business in about 1854. He was a have lived up to this extravagant party labels or government positions. “rectifier” who took raw spirits, added other description, one of her few extant likenesses Grant’s response likely occurred before ingredients, and sold them as whiskey. [Figure 6] indicates a certain he was aware of Babcock’s involvement Among the spirituous products he appeal. in the Great Whiskey Ring. Always loyal apparently concocted with Kelly’s collaboration was Old Cabin Bitters. When the May 10 raid occurred, Garnhart was one of those arrested. His company disappeared forever from St. Louis city directories. For one year, Adler, Furst & Co. was listed in directories as “successor to J. H. Garnhart & Co.”, then it too disappeared. My research has failed to determine the fate of Kelly but his Cabin Bitters brand vanished about the same time. General Babcock and “The Sylph” The “femme fatal” of the Great Whiskey Ring was a St. Louis woman of easy virtue named Louise “Lou” Hawkins, who ultimately would become known to Figure 6: Louise Hawkins, millions of Americans simply as “The aka “The Sylph” Figure 7: Secretary Benjamin Bristow Bottles and Extras January-February 2007 61 to his staff, Grant later agreed to was a Southern product, from the H. Myers be deposed in Babcock’s graft case. He was Company of Savannah, Georgia. willing to go to St. Louis to testify but was Northern General Philip Sheridan could persuaded by presidential advisors to claim his name on three whiskeys: In answer questions from prosecution and 1876 the Bryce Smith Company of New defense lawyers only in the White House. York City registered its Sheridan Whiskey Even so, it was the first and only time in brand. Subsequently the Joseph Davis Co. American history that a sitting American of Minneapolis applied to the U.S. President has testified in a criminal case. government in 1906 for exclusive use of Grant’s usually good memory seemed the general’s name for “Sheridan Rye,” to fail him at times during the examination apparently ignoring the Sheridan Rye brand but he was strong in his defense of General being merchandised by M.
Recommended publications
  • Daniel D. Pratt: Senator and Commissioner
    Daniel D. Pratt: Senator and Commissioner Joseph E. Holliday* The election of Daniel D. Pratt, of Logansport, to the United States Senate in January, 1869, to succeed Thomas A. Hendricks had come after a bitter internal struggle within the ranks of the Republican members of the Indiana General Assembly. The struggle was precipitated by James Hughes, of Bloomington, who hoped to win the honor, but it also uncovered a personal feud between Lieutenant Governor Will E. Cumback, an early favorite for the seat, and Governor Conrad Baker. Personal rivalries threatened party harmony, and after several caucuses were unable to reach an agreement, Pratt was presented as a compromise candidate. He had been his party’s nominee for a Senate seat in 1863, but the Republicans were then the minority party in the legislature. With a majority in 1869, however, the Republicans were able to carry his election. Pratt’s reputation in the state was not based upon office-holding ; he had held no important state office, and his only legislative experience before he went to Washington in 1869 was service in two terms of the general assembly. It was his character, his leadership in the legal profession in northern Indiana, and his loyal service as a campaigner that earned for him the esteem of many in his party. Daniel D. Pratt‘s experience in the United States Senate began with the inauguration of Ulysses S. Grant in March, 1869. Presiding over the Senate was Schuyler Colfax, another Hoosier, who had just been inaugurated vice-president of the United States. During the administration of President Andrew Johnson, the government had been subjected to severe stress and strain between the legislative and executive branches.
    [Show full text]
  • A University Microfilms International
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2020 No. 181 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Friday, October 23, 2020, at 11:30 a.m. Senate THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2020 (Legislative day of Monday, October 19, 2020) The Senate met at 12 noon, on the ex- man, of Ohio, to be United States Dis- haven’t made the same tough decisions piration of the recess, and was called to trict Judge for the Southern District of and weren’t ready before the pandemic. order by the President pro tempore Ohio. Now Democrats want Iowans’ Federal (Mr. GRASSLEY). The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. tax money to bail out irresponsible FISCHER). The President pro tempore. f State governments and somehow this Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, I is worth holding up relief for strug- PRAYER ask to speak for 1 minute as in morn- gling families. Come on. The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- ing business. I yield the floor. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without fered the following prayer: RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER objection, it is so ordered. Let us pray. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The ma- FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY Lord of Heaven’s Army, we find our jority leader is recognized. Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, joy from trusting You. Today we are what we have seen over the last week ELECTION SECURITY trusting Your promise to supply all our are attempts to get COVID relief up Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Career of Stephen W
    37? N &/J /V z 7 PORTRAIT OF AN AGE: THE POLITICAL CAREER OF STEPHEN W. DORSEY, 1868-1889 DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Sharon K. Lowry, M.A. Denton, Texas May, 19 80 @ Copyright by Sharon K. Lowry 1980 Lowry, Sharon K., Portrait of an Age: The Political Career of Stephen W. Dorsey, 1868-1889. Doctor of Philosophy (History), May, 1980, 447 pp., 6 tables, 1 map, bibliography, 194 titles. The political career of Stephen Dorsey provides a focus for much of the Gilded Age. Dorsey was involved in many significant events of the period. He was a carpetbagger during Reconstruction and played a major role in the Compromise of 1877. He was a leader of the Stalwart wing of the Republican party, and he managed Garfield's 1880 presidential campaign. The Star Route Frauds was one of the greatest scandals of a scandal-ridden era, and Dorsey was a central figure in these frauds. Dorsey tried to revive his political career in New Mexico after his acquittal in the Star Route Frauds, but his reputation never recovered from the notoriety he received at the hands of the star route prosecutors. Like many of his contemporaries in Gilded Age politics, Dorsey left no personal papers which might have assisted a biographer. Sources for this study included manuscripts in the Library of Congress and the New Mexico State Records Center and Archives in Santa Fe; this study also made use of newspapers, records in the National Archives, congressional investigations of Dorsey printed in the reports and documents of the House and Senate, and the transcripts of the star route trials.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys
    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Solicitor Generalâ•Žs Clients
    LECTURE In Search of the Solicitor General's Clients: A Drama with Many Characters* By DREW S. DAYS m** I want, first, to express my sincerest appreciation for the invitation to deliver the Ninth Judge Mac Swinford Lecture at the University of Kentucky College ofLaw. It is a pleasure for me to get out ofWashing­ ton for a change - to begin with, to remind myself of what life is like "outside ofthe Beltway." I also saw this as an opportunity to see friends here at the law school whom I can no longer plan on encountering each year at the annual meeting ofthe Association ofAmerican Law Schools, since I am on leave from my law faculty. But, most importantly, there is a certain "rightness," I think, in being here as the Fortieth Solicitor General, since the first person to occupy my position was Benjamin H. Bristow, a Kentuckian.1 Benjamin H. Bristow, the first Solicitor General ofthe United States, was one of the leading lawyers of his generation. A Kentuckian, he served as a colonel during the Civil War. He later became United States Attomey for the District of Kentucky, where he was renowned for his vigor in enforcing the federal Civil Rights Acts.2 Before becoming Solicitor General in 1870, he practiced law with his fellow Kentuckian and future Supreme Court Justice, the first John Marshall Harlan.3 • This is an edited and embellished version ofthe Ninth Judge Mac Swinford Lecture, delivered at the University ofKentucky College ofLaw on November 10, 1994. •• Solicitor General of the United States. 1 BIOGRAPIDCAL DIRECTORY OF THE UNITED STAlES ExEcunvE BRANCH, 1774­ 1971, at 35-36 (Robert Sobel ed, 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • The Unitary Executive During the Second Half-Century
    THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE DURING THE SECOND HALF-CENTURY * STEVEN G. CALABRESI ** CHRISTOPHER S. YOO I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................668 II. THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE DURING THE JACKSONIAN PERIOD, 1837-1861 .........................669 A. Martin Van Buren .................................................670 B. William H. Harrison ..............................................678 C. John Tyler...............................................................682 D. James K. Polk..........................................................688 E. Zachary Taylor.......................................................694 F. Millard Fillmore.....................................................698 G. Franklin Pierce.......................................................704 H. James Buchanan .....................................................709 III. THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE DURING THE CIVIL WAR, 1861-1869 ..................................717 A. Abraham Lincoln....................................................718 B. Andrew Johnson.....................................................737 C. The Tenure of Office Act and the Impeachment of Andrew Johnson .................................................746 IV. THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE DURING THE GILDED AGE, 1869-1889................................759 A. Ulysses S. Grant ....................................................759 B. Rutherford B. Hayes...............................................769 C. James A. Garfield....................................................780 D. Chester
    [Show full text]
  • Laissez-Faire Theory in the Early American Bar Association Norbert Brockman
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 39 | Issue 3 Article 2 4-1-1964 Laissez-Faire Theory in the Early American Bar Association Norbert Brockman Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Norbert Brockman, Laissez-Faire Theory in the Early American Bar Association, 39 Notre Dame L. Rev. 270 (1964). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol39/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAISSEZ-FAIRE THEORY IN THE EARLY AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION Norbert Brockman, S.M.* The organized bar in the United States has, throughout its history, been shaped by the currents moving the history of the country at large. Thus, when the revolution that was Jacksonian democracy gathered strength in the 1820's, the legal profession felt its effects. The common view of the bar was that of Alexis de Tocqueville, who remarked: "If I were asked where I place the American Aristoc- racy, I should reply without hesitation... that it occupies the judicial bench and bar."' In the rising tide of Jacksonianism, this feeling could only result in a reaction against the organized bar. It was not uncommon for editors to accuse associations of undermining the bar, or even of being "conspiracies against the community at large."2 Traditionally, lawyers had been "called" to the bar, the admitting agent in the United States invariably being the court system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appointment of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles and Politics John P
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Indiana University Bloomington Maurer School of Law Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1941 The Appointment of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles and Politics John P. Frank Indiana University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Frank, John P., "The Appointment of Supreme Court Justices: Prestige, Principles and Politics" (1941). Articles by Maurer Faculty. Paper 1856. http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1856 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE APPOINTMENT OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES: PRESTIGE, PRINCIPLES AND POLITICS* JOHN P. FRANK Hidden in musty obscurity behind the forbidding covers of three hundred and more volumes of court reports, the Justices of the United States Supreme Court seldom emerge into public view. Deaths and retirements, new appointments, and occasional opinions attract fleeting attention; all else is unnoticed. But to the political scientist, to the historian, and, above all, to the lawyer, the Supreme Court is an object of vital concern. To the political scientist, the Court matters because it is the chief juggler in maintaining the Balance of Powers. To the historian, the Court matters because of its tre- mendous influence on the policies of federal and state governments.
    [Show full text]
  • The CHERRY FAMILIES of EARLY NORFOLK Co VA 101
    The CHERRY FAMILIES Of EARLY NORFOLK Co VA 101 George M Bristow [C2d2a2m], son of Sarah Cherry and Wesley Owen Bristow, was born 13 February 1855 in Macon Co MO. He was a physician in 1880 and lived with his sister Nancy at Independence, Macon Co MO. George died at Princeton, Mercer Co MO on 30 October 1943. He married Jessie Frances Trapp on 30 December 1886. She was born 17 July 1864 at Princeton, daughter of Jesse Trapp and Anna Haur, and died there on 21 June 1934. Her son Arthur was the informant for her death certificate. Jessie and George were buried at Princeton. They had two sons- 1. Harry G Bristow, b 17 Oct 1887 at Princeton, Mercer Co MO. In June 1917 he was an assistant professor of chemistry at Saint Louis University, Saint Louis MO in the pre- 1930 years, but was a medical doctor in 1930. He married Grace Harbols on 30 November 1911. She was born in 1888 in IA, and died in 1977. Harriy died in 1946. They were buried in Princeton Cemetery in Mercer Co. They had three children- a. Arthur H Bristow, b 1914 (125wf) b. Donald L Bristow, b 1915 (125wf) c. Marilyn R Bristow, b Oct 1919 (125wf) (W,M,166uvc,125wf) 2. Arthur Shaw Bristow, b 16 Mar 1892 at Princeton, Mercer Co MO. In 1917 he was an intern at CM & St Paul & Penn Hospital at Chicago. Durind WWI he was a 1st Lieutenant in the US Army Medical Corp. In 1920 they were at Morgan, Mercer Co, then at Princeton in 1930.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Bookshelf D
    Journal of Supreme Court History SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY WARREN E. BURGER Chief Justice 1969-1986 Journal of Supreme Court History PUBLICA TIONS COMMITTEE E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr. Chairman Donald B. Ayer Louis R. Cohen Charles Cooper Kenneth S. Geller James J. Kilpatrick Melvin I. Urofsky BOARD OF EDITORS Melvin I. U rofsky, Chairman HennanBelz Craig Joyce David O'Brien David J. Bodenhamer Laura Kalman Michael Parrish Kermit Hall MaevaMarcus Philippa Strum MANAGING EDITOR Clare Cushman CONSULTING EDITORS Kathleen Shurtleff Patricia R. Evans James J. Kilpatrick Jennifer M. Lowe DavidT.Pride Supreme Court Historical Society Board of Trustees Honorary Chairman William H. Rehnquist Honorary Trustees Harry A. Blackmun Byron R. White Chairman President DwightD.Opperman Leon Silverman Vice Presidents Vincente. Burke,lr. Frank e. Jones Dorothy Tapper Goldman E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr. Secretary Treasurer Virginia Warren Daly Sheldon S. Cohen Trustees George R. Adams KennethS. Geller Stephen W. Nealon Victor Battaglia FrankB. Gilbert Gordon O. Pehrson Helman Belz John D. Gordan III Leon Polsky Barbara A. Black Geoffreye. Hazard, Jr. Charles B. Renfrew HugoL. Black,lr. Judith Ri chards Hope Wi II iamB radford Reynolds Vera Brown Ruth lnsel John R. Ri sher, Jr. Wade Burger WilliamE. Jackson Harvey Ri shikof Patricia Dwinnell Butler Robb M. Jones WilliamP. Rogers Benjamin R. Ci viletti JamesJ. Kilpatrick Jonathan e. Rose Andrew M. Coats Peter A. Knowles Jerold S. Solovy William T. Coleman, Jr. Philip Allen Lacovara Kenneth Starr F. Elwood Davis Ralph l. Lancaster, Jr. Cathleen Douglas Stone George Didden III JeromeB. Libin Agnes N. Williams Charlton Dietz Maureen E. Mahoney W.
    [Show full text]
  • Data from Records 1752-1865
    Data from Records 1752-1865 Compiled and Indexed by Thomas P Hughes, Jr. Electronically reformatted in 2014 by J. Barrett Chappell, Jr., Clerk Index to Data Click on the link below and it automatically take you to the page in the document 1. Introduction to Records from the Compiler – Page II 2. Account Book of Dr. Robert Walker – Pages 1-2 • Original book located in Virginia Historical Society 3. Mrs. Mary Elizabeth Low Weaver’s abstracts of old letters – Pages 3-9 4. Marriages in Deed Books 1-6 – Pages 10-30 5. Marriages miscellaneous – Pages 31-32 6. Surveyor’s Platt Book – Pages 33-49 7. Personal Property Tax Rolls condensed and probable kinships 1782-1820 – Pages 50-143 8. Index • Does not include persons with charges in Dr. Robert Walker’s Account Book and Marriages Helpful Tip In addition to searching the index you are able to search by using the find feature by clicking here or press ‘clt+f’ in Adobe. This will allow you to search the whole document for a particular name or word. *Note: All words may not be found using this feature and may not be a 100% accurate. DINWIDDIE COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATA 1752 - 1865 COMPILED AND INDEXED By Thomas P. Hughes, Jr • • PUBLISHER Thomas P. Hughes, Jr. 4140 Chanwi1 Avenue Memphis, Tennessee 38117 DEDICATION to my friend CHARLES HUGHES HAMLIN i .. I Dinwiddie County, Virginia was formed in 1752 from Prince George County, Virginia. All of the early Courthouse records were lost during the Civil War. Dr. Robert Walker's Account "" Book was copied at the Virginia Historical Society.
    [Show full text]