The Political Career of Stephen W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Political Career of Stephen W 37? N &/J /V z 7 PORTRAIT OF AN AGE: THE POLITICAL CAREER OF STEPHEN W. DORSEY, 1868-1889 DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Sharon K. Lowry, M.A. Denton, Texas May, 19 80 @ Copyright by Sharon K. Lowry 1980 Lowry, Sharon K., Portrait of an Age: The Political Career of Stephen W. Dorsey, 1868-1889. Doctor of Philosophy (History), May, 1980, 447 pp., 6 tables, 1 map, bibliography, 194 titles. The political career of Stephen Dorsey provides a focus for much of the Gilded Age. Dorsey was involved in many significant events of the period. He was a carpetbagger during Reconstruction and played a major role in the Compromise of 1877. He was a leader of the Stalwart wing of the Republican party, and he managed Garfield's 1880 presidential campaign. The Star Route Frauds was one of the greatest scandals of a scandal-ridden era, and Dorsey was a central figure in these frauds. Dorsey tried to revive his political career in New Mexico after his acquittal in the Star Route Frauds, but his reputation never recovered from the notoriety he received at the hands of the star route prosecutors. Like many of his contemporaries in Gilded Age politics, Dorsey left no personal papers which might have assisted a biographer. Sources for this study included manuscripts in the Library of Congress and the New Mexico State Records Center and Archives in Santa Fe; this study also made use of newspapers, records in the National Archives, congressional investigations of Dorsey printed in the reports and documents of the House and Senate, and the transcripts of the star route trials. Dorsey's voting record in the Senate was analyzed with the aid of a computer, and the study of the Star Route Frauds benefited from access to the business records of Dorsey's partner, James W. Bosler, supplied by the Bosler family. This study traces the public life of Stephen Dorsey chronologically from his service in the Civil War to the end of his political career, which came with his failure to have a friend appointed governor of New Mexico Territory in 1889. Traditional interpretations of Dorsey are based on a combination of scant evidence, carpetbagger stereotypes, and the assumption that he was guilty of masterminding the monumental swindle of the Star Route Frauds. Closer examination of Dorsey's public life, however, reveals that this traditional view is distorted. Dorsey does not conform to the image of the carpet- bagger painted by Arkansas historians. Dorsey's involvement in Arkansas politics shows further that historians have misinterpreted the nature of the Republican party in Arkansas during Reconstruction. Dorsey also does not conform to the image of the machine politician typical of traditional accounts of the Gilded Age. In addition to being a politician, Dorsey was an entrepreneur, personifying the alliance of business and politics characteristic of his era. This study shows that it is impossible to study a Gilded Age political figure without also considering his business interests. Many of Dorsey's political activities, for example his involvement in the Compromise of 1877, can be traced to his business enterprises. Dorsey was typical of the many Gilded Age speculators who never realized any lasting gains from their adventures. A major conclusion of this study is that the assumption on which most traditional views of Dorsey are based, that he was the mastermind behind the Star Route Frauds, is not supported by the evidence. Although Dorsey was not entirely innocent in the frauds, he was not guilty of the crimes with which the government charged him. This study also concludes that Dorsey was left vulnerable to the prosecution which ended his career in national politics by the peculiarly personal nature of the Republican party in the Gilded Age. That personal control had contributed to Dorsey's rise to power in the Republican party; it also led to his destruction, PREFACE The political career of Stephen Dorsey provides a focus for much of the Gilded Age. Dorsey earned the Civil War record necessary for success in the Gilded Age, and from then on, he participated in nearly every significant event or movement of the period. He was a carpetbagger during Reconstruction and played a major role in the Compromise of 1877. He was in the Senate during the great currency debates of the 1870's. He was intimate with the leaders of the Stalwart wing of the Republican party, and he managed James A. Garfield's 1880 campaign and became an important adviser for the president-elect. After the Whiskey Ring, the Star Route Frauds was perhaps the greatest scandal of the period; Dorsey was on the fringes of the Whiskey Ring scandal, and he was a central figure in the Star Route Frauds. He was also a primary target of the anti-monopoly sentiment in New Mexico that surfaced in that territory's Populist revolt. But one of the lessons of this study is that one cannot treat a Gilded Age political figure without also considering his business interests. Dorsey was an in IV entrepreneur, a speculator, a promoter. He became involved in national politics through his presidency of the Arkansas Central Railway Company during Reconstruction, when many railroad owners relied on some form of government aid. His involvement in the Compromise of 1877 was at least partly related to his interest in a branch of the Texas and Pacific Railroad. When the railroad boom ended, Dorsey continued speculating in land, cattle, mining, and a number of other enterprises; his partners in these ventures were also Gilded Age political figures, such as James G. Blaine, Stephen B. Elkins, and Robert G. Ingersoll. An examination of Dorsey thus affords a closer look at, and perhaps a re-examination of, Reconstruction and carpetbaggers, Gilded Age machine politics and the scandals of the age, and the relationship of politics and business in late-nineteenth-century America. Like most of his contemporaries in Gilded Age politics, however, Dorsey left no papers. The only available Dorsey correspondence of any political significance is that preserved in the James A. Garfield papers, and this correspondence covers only an eight-month span in Dorsey's career, from July, 1880, to March, 1881. Information concerning Dorsey is therefore scant, and biographers must sift through newspaper accounts, V congressional investigations, and the testimony taken in the star route trials, carefully allowing for the bias of a Democratic editor or a self-interested witness. Most of the generalizations made about Dorsey by historians are therefore based on a combination of slender evidence and the notoriety he received in the most public event of his life, the star route trials. Scholars have assumed Dorsey's guilt in these frauds and have extrapolated that view of Dorsey backward over his entire career. Thus, one student of the 1880 election, describing Indiana as a particularly venal battleground, comments, "It was Stephen Dorsey's kind of state.When Dorsey was selected as secretary of the Republican National Committee, many of Garfield's friends warned the candidate not to trust Dorsey; many others, however, praised the selection, and both sets of predictions would have been dismissed as samples of the kind of political backbiting common to a campaign had not the star route trials made prophets of Dorsey's detractors. Historians have used the assumption of Dorsey's guilt in the Star Route Frauds "'"David M. Jordan, Roscoe Conkling of New York: Voice in the Senate (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971), p. 349. VI to throw light on his earlier career in Arkansas, about which little is known, and have combined this assumption with the traditional view of Reconstruction to present Dorsey as a corrupt and opportunistic carpetbagger. Charges relating to Dorsey's sale of the Sandusky Tool Company, unspoken at the time of the sale in 1871, were aired in the press during the star route trials and found their way into the official history of the company. The official history of Oberlin College, written in 1943, apologizes for the school's association with Dorsey, an apology not called for by Dorsey's record as a student in 1860. This study attempts to trace the public life of Stephen Dorsey from his birth forward, without preconceptions superimposed onto it. Examining Dorsey's career forward instead of backward allows one to trace the development of that career in a manner impossible for those who assume that the Star Route Frauds were typical of Dorsey's public life. Such an examination reveals a somewhat different picture of Dorsey's life from that usually presented, particularly with reference to his activities as a carpet- bagger, his role as a member of the Stalwart faction of the Republican party, and his part in the Star Route Frauds. Vll Because this is primarily a political biography, it will conclude with the end of Dorsey's political career, which came with his failure to secure the appointment of a friend and business partner as governor of New Mexico in 1889. Dorsey remained active in business until his death in 1916, but his influence in national affairs ended with his departure from the political arena. Correcting the traditional image of Dorsey will, it is hoped, make it possible to bring much of post-Civil War America into clearer focus. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF MAPS x Chapter I. FOUNDATIONS OF GILDED AGE SUCCESS 1 II. ENTREPRENEUR AND POLITICIAN 25 III. DISASTER IN ARKANSAS 48 IV. CARPETBAGGER SENATOR 80 V.
Recommended publications
  • (Extra)ORDINARY MEN
    (Extra)ORDINARY MEN: African-American Lawyers and Civil Rights in Arkansas Before 1950 Judith Kilpatrick* “The remarkable thing is not that black men attempted to regain their stolen civic rights, but that they tried over and over again, using a wide va- riety of techniques.”1 I. INTRODUCTION Arkansas has a tradition, beginning in 1865, of African- American attorneys who were active in civil rights. During the eighty years following the Emancipation Proclamation, at least sixty-nine African-American men were admitted to practice law in the state.2 They were all men of their times, frequently hold- * Associate Professor, University of Arkansas School of Law; J.S.D. 1999, LL.M. 1992, Columbia University, J.D. 1975, B.A. 1972, University of California-Berkeley. The author would like to thank the following: the historians whose work is cited here; em- ployees of The Arkansas History Commission, The Butler Center of the Little Rock Public Library, the Pine Bluff Public Library and the Helena Public Library for patience and help in locating additional resources; Patricia Cline Cohen, Professor of American History at the University of California, Santa Barbara, for reviewing the draft and providing comments; and Jon Porter (UA 1999) and Mickie Tucker (UA 2001) for their excellent research assis- tance. Much appreciation for summer research grants from the University of Arkansas School of Law in 1998 and 1999. Special thanks to Elizabeth Motherwell, of the Universi- ty of Arkansas Press, for starting me in this research direction. No claim is made as to the completeness of this record. Gaps exist and the author would appreciated receiving any information that might help to fill them.
    [Show full text]
  • H.Doc. 108-224 Black Americans in Congress 1870-2007
    “The Negroes’ Temporary Farewell” JIM CROW AND THE EXCLUSION OF AFRICAN AMERICANS FROM CONGRESS, 1887–1929 On December 5, 1887, for the first time in almost two decades, Congress convened without an African-American Member. “All the men who stood up in awkward squads to be sworn in on Monday had white faces,” noted a correspondent for the Philadelphia Record of the Members who took the oath of office on the House Floor. “The negro is not only out of Congress, he is practically out of politics.”1 Though three black men served in the next Congress (51st, 1889–1891), the number of African Americans serving on Capitol Hill diminished significantly as the congressional focus on racial equality faded. Only five African Americans were elected to the House in the next decade: Henry Cheatham and George White of North Carolina, Thomas Miller and George Murray of South Carolina, and John M. Langston of Virginia. But despite their isolation, these men sought to represent the interests of all African Americans. Like their predecessors, they confronted violent and contested elections, difficulty procuring desirable committee assignments, and an inability to pass their legislative initiatives. Moreover, these black Members faced further impediments in the form of legalized segregation and disfranchisement, general disinterest in progressive racial legislation, and the increasing power of southern conservatives in Congress. John M. Langston took his seat in Congress after contesting the election results in his district. One of the first African Americans in the nation elected to public office, he was clerk of the Brownhelm (Ohio) Townshipn i 1855.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel D. Pratt: Senator and Commissioner
    Daniel D. Pratt: Senator and Commissioner Joseph E. Holliday* The election of Daniel D. Pratt, of Logansport, to the United States Senate in January, 1869, to succeed Thomas A. Hendricks had come after a bitter internal struggle within the ranks of the Republican members of the Indiana General Assembly. The struggle was precipitated by James Hughes, of Bloomington, who hoped to win the honor, but it also uncovered a personal feud between Lieutenant Governor Will E. Cumback, an early favorite for the seat, and Governor Conrad Baker. Personal rivalries threatened party harmony, and after several caucuses were unable to reach an agreement, Pratt was presented as a compromise candidate. He had been his party’s nominee for a Senate seat in 1863, but the Republicans were then the minority party in the legislature. With a majority in 1869, however, the Republicans were able to carry his election. Pratt’s reputation in the state was not based upon office-holding ; he had held no important state office, and his only legislative experience before he went to Washington in 1869 was service in two terms of the general assembly. It was his character, his leadership in the legal profession in northern Indiana, and his loyal service as a campaigner that earned for him the esteem of many in his party. Daniel D. Pratt‘s experience in the United States Senate began with the inauguration of Ulysses S. Grant in March, 1869. Presiding over the Senate was Schuyler Colfax, another Hoosier, who had just been inaugurated vice-president of the United States. During the administration of President Andrew Johnson, the government had been subjected to severe stress and strain between the legislative and executive branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Mclain, Joseph E **** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders O
    Mclain, Joseph E From: Drake Abramson <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 12:06 PM To: Elections Subject: In-Person Voting **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** To the Indiana Election Commission: In-person voting is a sacred right, and time-tested tradition for Hoosier voters all across the state of Indiana. All though these are unprecedented times, we should continue to preserve these long held traditions of in-person voting on election day. There are countless ways in which we can provide safe training and resources to county election administrators to ensure election day is safe for all those participating. There are numerous examples that show voting by mail is significantly more susceptible to voter fraud than election day voting. This can be shown through some very specific examples including some of the following I have mentioned below: Max Judson, Sullivan County Council member – Fraudulent use of absentee ballots – Pled guilty to three counts of voter fraud Doug Campbell, Mayor of Austin Indiana – Fraudulent use of absentee ballots – Completed an incomplete ballot for a voter Michael Marshall, Jennings County Democrat Party worker – Fraudulent use of absentee ballots – Fraudulently submitted absentee ballot applications for his son, brother and former roommate. I understand that we are going through unprecedented times but in order to keep stability in our state, we must adjust and proceed accordingly. I believe with proper training of county election administrators, we can ensure safety when voting in-person on election day.
    [Show full text]
  • A University Microfilms International
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2020 No. 181 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Friday, October 23, 2020, at 11:30 a.m. Senate THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2020 (Legislative day of Monday, October 19, 2020) The Senate met at 12 noon, on the ex- man, of Ohio, to be United States Dis- haven’t made the same tough decisions piration of the recess, and was called to trict Judge for the Southern District of and weren’t ready before the pandemic. order by the President pro tempore Ohio. Now Democrats want Iowans’ Federal (Mr. GRASSLEY). The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. tax money to bail out irresponsible FISCHER). The President pro tempore. f State governments and somehow this Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, I is worth holding up relief for strug- PRAYER ask to speak for 1 minute as in morn- gling families. Come on. The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- ing business. I yield the floor. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without fered the following prayer: RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER objection, it is so ordered. Let us pray. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The ma- FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY Lord of Heaven’s Army, we find our jority leader is recognized. Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, joy from trusting You. Today we are what we have seen over the last week ELECTION SECURITY trusting Your promise to supply all our are attempts to get COVID relief up Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Union Gleaner for 1906
    ,z.:,,,e,-,?e,mv,:ms,.50,:,x.ww:.g.gmtnng,,,:gio,?&,),.._:,;,,,tx,,>,:,,,,,*.g,(.15,t, 4xty,(w...m.y,:gwagmm4i,,,,,,wh-zpgsva.gfx, 6 le,,VA(VA4ekge et, ? 41.<4 ,V c 0 ':P ATLANTIC ION 1[z ,. c NE 04.1%r7 4-sp - 7"7 • ,.- GL4E ;\:' ' C 1 4.., • A- fegi: *- ,(- e a; , 4., • ,,'8 .,;(. = (1.-,;?:-- ,<.> ,s'e. k?. ., k:".. ... 2-- P:.••• kf'..›,(t - (i••• ;•..,<-1.- k *> ;-. X** ? K= 0 ;:i:., (i.? fa, (4*e 2 ;.?_> ;NL>,;,,,:?.>(% ,;• ..,:t> - ,(•.•- ,:: b . ,:?.,,' 2 :*- ,<•?...- <4xt4 , , kl, 2• A.,3 3, k 1-• %:1- :q ?... e 2 k> ;.,. :- e.... ,';i= ;, i- a• ,,c:, 2, 1%31 : - "Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; for they are white already to harvest." VoL. V SOUTH LANCASTER, MASS., OCTOBER 24, 1906 No. 42 FALLING LEAVES. was, may be learned in some degree fruitful field be counted for a forest." by seeing nature when it puts on its Amid such scenes of beauty will be FALLING, falling, gently falling leaf and bloom, and the gentle zeph- the home of the redeemed. Are the leaves to-day, In the orchard, in the forest, yrs play among the trees. In the Eden home man was given By the broad highway. In that garden was every tree that dominion over every beast of the Let us all a lesson gather was pleasant to look upon and that was field, and every fowl of the air. Be- From the falling leaves: good for food, unmarred by the curse cause of sin, this dominion was lost, Soon will come the time of harvest, that came upon the earth because of and the fear of them came upon man.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayoral Elections in Indiana 2003–2015 Mayoral Elections in Indiana
    Center for Local Elections in American Politics MayoralMayoral ElectionsElections inin IndianaIndiana 2003–20152003–2015 May 2016 Melissa Marschall John Lappie sustainable so that it can continue to provide data, research and information to scholars, practitioners and policymakers long into the future. By creating a database that updates automatically — and About the Center for Local Elections in constantly — we are able to ensure we have the most current American Politics information available to help researchers, journalists and others effectively study government. While the presidential campaign The Center for Local Elections in American Politics (LEAP) is continues to generate headlines, the heart of democracy is at developing pathbreaking solutions to the problem of collecting, the local level. We believe LEAP’s database will allow us to digitizing and disseminating data on local elections. More better understand the process and outcomes of these elections. information is available at http://www.leap-elections.org/. The United States is viewed as an archetype of democracy, yet fundamental questions about the nature of our government and its electoral processes and outcomes are often difficult to answer because of a simple problem: a lack of data. Because elections are decentralized in this country, basic Rice University’s Kinder Institute for Urban Research is a information about local contests is difficult to access. To date, “think and do” tank that advances understanding of the there has been no comprehensive source of data on U.S. local challenges facing Houston and other urban centers through elections. The situation has vexed political scientists, journalists research, policy analysis and public outreach.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant Papers Finding Aid
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction USGPL Finding Aids Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library 12-1-2020 Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant papers Finding Aid Ulysses S. Grant Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/usgpl-findingaids Recommended Citation Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant papers, Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library, Mississippi State University This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGPL Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant papers USGPL.USGJDG This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on December 01, 2020. Mississippi State University Libraries P.O. Box 5408 Mississippi State 39762 [email protected] URL: http://library.msstate.edu/specialcollections Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant papers USGPL.USGJDG Table of Contents Summary Information ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical Note: Ulysses S. Grant ................................................................................................................. 3 Scope and Content Note ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Administrative
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Summary of New Laws
    2018 SUMMARY OF NEW LAWS State Senator Senate District 12 Blake Doriot SECOND REGULAR SESSION AND FIRST SPECIAL SESSION OF THE 120TH INDIANA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2018 SUMMARY OF NEW LAWS PREPARED BY THE SENATE MAJORITY COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE WITH ASSISTANCE FROM THE SENATE MAJORITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE PREFACE This document is a comprehensive summary of the laws passed by the 2018 Indiana General Assembly. It includes 210 bills passed during the Regular Legislative Session completed on March 14, 2018, and 5 bills passed during the Special Legislative Session held May 14, 2018. The full digest of each passed bill is listed in numerical order in the first section of the document, followed by a table showing all author/sponsor information as well as committee and floor vote totals. The addendum at the back includes information on the General Assembly’s 2018 actions regarding the Governor’s veto of HEA 1523-2017, a listing of 2018 passed bills by the Senate Committees in which they were heard, and public law/bill number conversion charts. Please note that bills from the 2018 Special Session are listed with “-SS” at the end of the bill number throughout this book. Since 4 of the 5 Special Session bills were largely identical to bills that were considered but did not pass during the Regular Session, the listing of 2018 passed bills by Senate Committee includes the Special Session bills under the Committee that heard their Regular Session counterpart bills. For further information concerning 2018 new laws, please contact either the Senate Majority Attorney's Office at (317) 232-9415 or the Legislative Information Center of the Legislative Services Agency at (317) 232-9856.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Activities of African-American Members of the Arkansas Legislature, 1868-73
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2011 "The Africans Have Taken Arkansas": Political Activities of African-American Members of the Arkansas Legislature, 1868-73 Christopher Warren Branam University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the African American Studies Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Citation Branam, C. W. (2011). "The Africans Have Taken Arkansas": Political Activities of African-American Members of the Arkansas Legislature, 1868-73. Theses and Dissertations Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/90 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THE AFRICANS HAVE TAKEN ARKANSAS”: POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN MEMBERS OF THE ARKANSAS LEGISLATURE, 1868-73 “THE AFRICANS HAVE TAKEN ARKANSAS”: POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN MEMBERS OF THE ARKANSAS LEGISLATURE, 1868-73 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By Christopher Warren Branam California State University, Fresno Bachelor of Arts in Journalism, 1994 May 2011 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT African-American lawmakers in the Arkansas General Assembly during Radical Reconstruction became politically active at a time when the legislature was addressing the most basic issues of public life, such as creating the infrastructure of public education and transportation in the state. They were actively engaged in the work of the legislature. Between 1868 and 1873, they introduced bills that eventually became laws.
    [Show full text]
  • The Governors of Connecticut, 1905
    ThegovernorsofConnecticut Norton CalvinFrederick I'his e dition is limited to one thousand copies of which this is No tbe A uthor Affectionately Dedicates Cbis Book Co George merriman of Bristol, Connecticut "tbe Cruest, noblest ana Best friend T €oer fia<T Copyrighted, 1 905, by Frederick Calvin Norton Printed by Dorman Lithographing Company at New Haven Governors Connecticut Biographies o f the Chief Executives of the Commonwealth that gave to the World the First Written Constitution known to History By F REDERICK CALVIN NORTON Illustrated w ith reproductions from oil paintings at the State Capitol and facsimile sig natures from official documents MDCCCCV Patron's E dition published by THE CONNECTICUT MAGAZINE Company at Hartford, Connecticut. ByV I a y of Introduction WHILE I w as living in the home of that sturdy Puritan governor, William Leete, — my native town of Guil ford, — the idea suggested itself to me that inasmuch as a collection of the biographies of the chief executives of Connecticut had never been made, the work would afford an interesting and agreeable undertaking. This was in the year 1895. 1 began the task, but before it had far progressed it offered what seemed to me insurmountable obstacles, so that for a time the collection of data concerning the early rulers of the state was entirely abandoned. A few years later the work was again resumed and carried to completion. The manuscript was requested by a magazine editor for publication and appeared serially in " The Connecticut Magazine." To R ev. Samuel Hart, D.D., president of the Connecticut Historical Society, I express my gratitude for his assistance in deciding some matters which were subject to controversy.
    [Show full text]