Homes - Site Allocations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Consultation Point: Homes - Site Allocations Person ID 1217837 Full Name Gerrit Jan Aberson ID 613 Order 79 Number 5.2 Title Homes - Site Allocations Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan's ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-level upload - Please upload any supporting evidence Plan-Level: Duty to Co-operate - Do you consider the Local Plan to have met the requirements of the Duty to Co-operate in accordance with section 110 of Localism Act 2011 and section 33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004? Please note that any non-compliance with the Duty to Co-operate is incapable of modification at examination Duty to Co-operate a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan has met/not met the requirements of the Duty to Co-operate.Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Attendance at the EiP - If your representation is proposing a modification(s), do you consider is necessary to participate at the examination in public? Attend EiPb - If you wish to participate at the examination in public, please outline why you consider this to be necessary (please be as precise and succinct as possible Policy Level - PP - If you do not believe this policy to be positively The exceptional circumstances required to release Green Belt land and change prepared please explain why the Green Belt boundaries have not been proven because: 1. not all brownfield and urban regeneration sites as defined in NPPF paragraph 118 adequately considered other than a mention in the HELAA 2523 2. As stated by Buckinghamshire County Council's response to the Green Belt Preferred Options consultation, there is enough non Green Belt Land available within the Housing Market Area that includes Chiltern and South Bucks Districts 3. Chiltern and South Bucks will be incorporated in the Buckinghamshire Unitary Authority prior to the plan being declared sound 4. Duty to cooperate discussions/agreements have not been had with all neighbouring districts 5. The exceptional circumstances report outlines that it (exceptional circumstances) is all driven by the the unmet need and proves that the process followed was in advance of, rather than after as defined in the NPPF paragraph 137 (although the districts have been very 'careful' with their wording throughout, their intentions are clear from the outset) PP Mods - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how The only option is to remove the Green Belt release sites and do the work you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test properly. Given the timelines that means that to make the Chiltern and South of soundness. Bucks Draft Local Plan all Green Belt release sites should be dropped and the plan approved with a shortfall. The shortfall can then be adsorbed within the new Bucks Unitary Authority as a priority. Policy 1 - If you do not believe this policy to be justified please explain why Policy 2a - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 2 - If you do not believe this policy to be effective please explain why. PAa - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 3 - If you do not believe this policy in consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework Feb 2019 please explain why Policy 3a - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy-level file upload - Please attach any supporting evidence Person ID 1219805 Full Name Barbara Ford ID 1306 Order 79 Number 5.2 Title Homes - Site Allocations Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the 2524 Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan's ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-level upload - Please upload any supporting evidence Plan-Level: Duty to Co-operate - Do you consider the Local Plan to have met the requirements of the Duty to Co-operate in accordance with section 110 of Localism Act 2011 and section 33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004? Please note that any non-compliance with the Duty to Co-operate is incapable of modification at examination Duty to Co-operate a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan has met/not met the requirements of the Duty to Co-operate.Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Attendance at the EiP - If your representation is proposing a modification(s), do you consider is necessary to participate at the examination in public? Attend EiPb - If you wish to participate at the examination in public, please outline why you consider this to be necessary (please be as precise and succinct as possible Policy Level - PP - If you do not believe this policy to be positively The provision for 90 new homes in both SP BP4 and SP BP5 does not seem to prepared please explain why take into account the existing capacity of schools in the area. As far as I am aware the two areas - BP4 and BP5 - would both come within the catchment area for St Mary's Primary School, School Lane, Amersham HP7. As the school would need to expand in order to take on more pupils this would impact heavily on the housing nearby, the already overstretched parking on School Lane and Mill Lane and the land around the school which I believe is green belt. PP Mods - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how The policy for an increase in homes in the Amersham areas (BP4 and BP5) needs you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test to include the provision for a new primary school to accommodate the increased of soundness. amount of children living in the area. Policy 1 - If you do not believe this policy to be justified please explain why Policy 2a - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 2 - If you do not believe this policy to be effective please explain why. PAa - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy 3 - If you do not believe this policy in consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework Feb 2019 please explain why Policy 3a - Please specify as precisely and succinctly as possible how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. Policy-level file upload - Please attach any supporting evidence Person ID 1220364 Full Name David Frith ID 1577 Order 79 Number 5.2 Title Homes - Site Allocations 2525 Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID Full Name Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to be legally compliant/non-compliant.