Human Rights Institute ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014 the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Human Rights Institute ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014 the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014 The Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School The Human Rights Institute sits at the heart of human rights teach- ing, practice, and scholarship at Columbia Law School. Founded in 1998 by the late Professor Louis Henkin, the Institute draws on the Law School’s deep human rights tradition to support and influence human rights practice in the United States and throughout the world. The activities of the Human Rights Clinic are included in the Institute’s work, enabling us to multiply our impact on the field and engage stu- dents more fully in our efforts. The Institute currently focuses its work in several substantive areas: Human Rights in the United States; Counterterrorism, Armed Conflict, and Human Rights; Human Rights in the Global Economy; and Human Rights and Rule of Law in Burma. We have developed distinct approaches to work in each area, building bridges between scholar- ship and activism, developing capacity within the legal community, engaging governments, and modeling new strategies for progress. This report details our activities from September 2013–August 2014. CONTENTS Human Rights Initiatives 2013–2014 1 Human Rights in the United States 1 Counterterrorism, Armed Conflict, and Human Rights 7 Human Rights and the Global Economy 9 Human Rights and Rule of Law in Burma 11 Events 12 Continuing Legal Education Events 12 Conferences and Workshops 12 Speaker Series 15 Publication Highlights 19 Faculty and Staff 20 Affiliated Researchers and Advisers 24 Welcome New Institute Faculty and Staff 25 Spotlight on Alumni 27 human rights initiatives 2013–2014 Human Rights in the United States The Institute’s Human Rights in the United States Project develops the capacity of A centerpiece of the U.S. lawyers, policymakers, and advocates to incorporate a human rights framework Institute’s Human into domestic advocacy efforts. We build networks, facilitate trainings, conduct educational outreach, and promote coordination among progressive public policy Rights in the United and advocacy groups. The Project also directly contributes to the development of States Project, our legal theories and positive precedents based on international law through work on Bringing Human select litigation before U.S. courts, in international and regional fora, and through other research and advocacy projects. Rights Home (BHRH) Lawyers’ Network Building the Field of Domestic has grown to more than Human Rights Lawyers 730 members, including individuals working A centerpiece of the Institute’s Human Rights in the United States Project, our Bringing Human Rights Home (BHRH) Lawyers’ Network has grown to more than 730 members, in more than 37 states including individuals working in more than 37 states across the U.S. The membership of across the U.S. our BHRH Lawyers’ Network is drawn from approximately 200 advocacy and legal ser- vices organizations, 50 universities and law schools, and a number of private law firms, as well as state and local human rights bodies. Our members, who range from law students to attorneys in practice for more than 50 years, are dedicated to using international law and human rights strategies as part of their domestic advocacy efforts. This year’s bian- nual BHRH Network meetings brought members together to discuss common challenges, engage in strategic discussions, and develop joint strate- gies and projects on issues including U.N. advocacy, U.S. policy initiatives, U.S. matters before the Inter-American Commission, and pending cases in U.S. courts. We con- vened periodic meetings of the Network’s Working Group on the Inter-American System and also launched a new Working Group on Local Human Rights Lawyering, in conjunction with American University Washington College of Law’s Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. Through the former group, the Institute facilitated peri- odic communication and meetings among Network mem- bers, the U.S. State Department, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In between meetings, BHRH Network members stayed connected through the BHRH Lawyers’ Network listserv and participated in two Continuing Legal Education programs (see Events, page 12). Members also made use of the Institute’s U.S. Human Rights Online Library, our online clearinghouse for The fall 2013 Bringing Human Rights Home Lawyers’ Network Meeting domestic human rights resources, including sample briefs, pleadings, and other materials relevant to this work. ANNUAL REPORT 2013–2014 1 human rights initiatives 2013–2014 State and Local Implementation of Human Rights State and local governments play a key role in ensuring that the United States meets its human rights treaty obligations. The Institute works to strengthen human rights protec- tions in the United States by building the capacity of state and local officials to implement human rights at the local level, and by advocating for federal support and coordination of these efforts. Under the direction of JoAnn Kamuf Ward, associate director of the Institute’s Human Rights in the U.S. Project, and the Institute’s Executive Director Risa Kaufman, the Institute engages in direct outreach to state and local officials and agencies, as well as conducts federal and international advocacy on these issues. As part of this work, the Institute chairs the Human Rights at Home (HuRAH) Campaign’s State and Local Government Subcommittee, bringing together state and local government officials and advocates from across the country to develop and implement strategies to incorporate human rights into local law, policy, and practice. In the past year, the Institute has strengthened its relationships with state and local human rights agencies throughout the U.S. and developed important new relationships with mayors and other local officials to iden- Left to right: Mayor Ralph Becker of tify opportunities to bring human rights home. We have done Salt Lake City and Mississippi Attorney this primarily through the International Association of Official Human Rights Agencies Jim Hood General at the ICCPR (IAOHRA) and the U.S. Conference of Mayors. review in Geneva In addition, the Institute develops resources and provides technical support to assist state and local officials in translating international human rights principles into local prac- tice. This year, we assisted the Tennessee Human Rights Commission in developing state- wide human rights hearings and traveled to Nashville, Tennessee, to present testimony on effective local human rights strategies. In August, we released a new toolkit on human rights impact audits and assessments, drawing on the experiences of five local jurisdictions that are using these tools. Also this year, the Institute intensified its efforts to advocate for federal support of state and local human rights implementation. The Institute led international advocacy on this issue through its participation in the March 2014 U.N. Human Rights Committee’s review of U.S. compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), as well as the August 2014 U.N. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination’s review of U.S. compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD). Along with our partner IAOHRA, the Institute submitted shadow reports and traveled to Left to right: Executive Director Geneva for both reviews to highlight state and local efforts to advance Risa Kaufman and Faculty Co-Director human rights and detail the need for federal support and coordination of this work. At the Sarah Cleveland conclusion of the reviews, both the Human Rights Committee and the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination issued recommendations consistent with the Institute’s submissions. 2 HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTE human rights initiatives 2013–2014 Access to Justice In response to the crisis in unmet civil legal needs, the Institute is strengthening human rights advocacy efforts to secure meaningful access to counsel in civil cases. Led by Executive Director Risa Kaufman, working with Institute Project Attorney Erin Foley Smith ’10, the Institute is enlisting and supporting legal services and the wider U.S. access to justice community to deepen advocacy efforts at the U.N. and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. This year, much of our access to justice work focused on the U.N. human rights treaty reviews. In conjunction with the U.N. Human Rights Committee’s review of U.S. compliance with the ICCPR in March 2014, the Institute drafted and submitted a coalition shadow report detailing the civil justice gap in the United States and recom- mending federal reforms to ensure that people who are low-income and poor have meaningful access to legal representation in cases where basic human needs are at stake, including in immigration proceedings. With our partner Northeastern University School of Law’s Program on Human Rights and the Global Economy (PHRGE), the Institute filed a similar report with the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination for its August 2014 review of U.S. compliance with the CERD. The Institute participated in the civil society delegation to both the ICCPR and CERD reviews in Geneva to raise awareness around the issue with the commit- tees and the U.S. government delegations, and engaged in wider public education around the issue. Our efforts resulted in strong recommendations from both committees. The U.N. Human Rights Committee recommended that the U.S. provide access to legal representation for immigrants and for domestic violence victims. The Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination recommended the U.S. guarantee access to legal representation in all immigration-related matters and allocate sufficient Left to right: Human Rights Clinic resources to ensure effective access to legal representation in civil proceed- students Sara Osama Kayyali ’14, ings implicating basic needs. Paula Ximena Mendez Azuela ’14 The Institute is working to translate and leverage this international success to support LL.M., Ami Shah ’15, and Caroline domestic litigation and advocacy.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
    United Nations CCPR/SP/89 International Covenant on Distr.: General 7 May 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Meeting of States parties Thirty-sixth meeting New York, 14 June 2018 Item 5 of the provisional agenda Election, in accordance with articles 28–34 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, of nine members of the Human Rights Committee to replace those whose terms are due to expire on 31 December 2018 Election of nine members of the Human Rights Committee to replace those whose terms are due to expire on 31 December 2018 Note by the Secretary-General 1. In conformity with articles 28 to 32 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the thirty-sixth meeting of States parties to the Covenant is to be held at United Nations Headquarters on 14 June 2018 for the purpose of electing nine members of the Human Rights Committee from a list of persons nominated by States parties (sect. II), to replace those whose terms of office will expire on 31 December 2018 (sect. I). I. Members of the Committee whose terms will expire on 31 December 2018 Name of member Country of nationality Mr. Yadh Ben Achour Tunisia Ms. Sarah Cleveland United States of America Mr. Olivier de Frouville France Mr. Yuji Iwasawa Japan Ms. Ivana Jelić Montenegro Mr. Duncan Laki Muhumuza Uganda Ms. Photini Pazartzis Greece Mr. Mauro Politi Italy Ms. Margo Waterval Suriname GE.18-07172 (E) 220518 230518 CCPR/SP/89 II. Persons nominated by States parties 2. In accordance with article 30 (2) of the Covenant, the Secretary-General, in a note verbale dated 15 December 2017, invited the States parties to submit, in conformity with article 29 of the Covenant, their nominations for the election of nine members of the Committee by 9 April 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence As a Human Rights Violation Caroline Bettinger-López University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2008 Human Rights at Home: Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Violation Caroline Bettinger-López University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Caroline Bettinger-López, Human Rights at Home: Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Violation, 42 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 581 (2008). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS AT HOME: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION Caroline Bettinger-L6pez* On March 2, 2007, Jessica Lenahan (formerly Gonzales)1 spoke at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Washington, D.C. about why she thought the United States was responsible for human rights violations against her and her deceased children. Before four commissioners, a U.S. State Department delegation, and members of the general public, she testified about how local police in Colorado refused to enforce a domestic violence restraining order against her estranged husband in 1999, and how her three daughters were tragically killed as a result. She discussed how her federal lawsuit against the police wound its way to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþm Icrosoft W
    iT HE SPIRIT iT HE SPIRIT a iya DEF 4 A BLACK EN r LiF Sol iDING IN AMERICA F | Randall Robinson A PLUME BOOK PLUME Published by the Penguin Group Penguin Putnam Inc., 375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014, U.S.A. Penguin Books Ltd, 27 Wrights Lane, London W8 5TZ, England Penguin Books Australia Ltd, Ringwood, Victoria, Australia Penguin Books Canada Ltd, 10 Alcorn Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4V 3B2 Penguin Books (N.Z.) Ltd, 182-190 Wairau Road, Auckland 10, New Zealand Penguin Books Ltd, Registered Offices: Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England Published by Plume, a member of Penguin Putnam Inc. Previously published in a Dutton edition. First Plume Printing, February, 1999 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Copyright © Randall Robinson, 1998 All rights reserved f REGISTERED TRADEMARK-MARCA REGISTRADA The Library of Congress has catalogued the Dutton edition as follows: Robinson, Randall. Defending the spirit: a Black life in America / Randall Robinson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-525-94402-8 (hc) ISBN 0-452-27968-2 (pbk) 1. Robinson, Randall. 2. Afro-Americans-Biography. 3. Afro-American political activists-Bography. 4. Political activists-United States- Biography. 5. TransAfrica Forum (Organization). 6. United States-Foreign relations-Africa. 7. Africa-Foreign relations-United States. 8. United StatesForeign relations- Caribbean Area. 9. Caribbean Area-Foreign relations-United States. 10. United States-Race relations. I. Title. E185.97.R665A3 1998 973'.0496073'0092-dc21 [B] 97-34052 CIP Printed In the United States of America Set in Cheltenham Book Original hardcover design by Leonard Telesca Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Join the Vanguard Inclusive and Innovative Leaders October 12-15
    Advancing Inclusive Leadership: Join the Vanguard Inclusive and Innovative Leaders October 12-15, 2020 Speaker Biographies* Joshua Bixby: Joshua Bixby has served as the CEO of Fastly since February 2020 and served as its President from May 2017 to February 2020. He has been on the executive leadership team at Fastly since December 2015 and served in a part-time advisory role since 2013. From February 2013 to August 2013, Mr. Bixby served as Vice President of Acceleration at Radware Ltd., a cybersecurity and application delivery solutions company. Mr. Bixby served as President and co-founder of Strangeloop Networks, a web application acceleration solutions company, from June 2006 until its acquisition by Radware in February 2013. From October 2002 to April 2006, Mr. Bixby was a co-founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of IronPoint Technology, Inc., a content management software solutions company. Mr. Bixby is the founder of Stanley Park Ventures, an early stage foundry based in Vancouver, British Columbia. Mr. Bixby earned his B.A. in Management and Business Economics from the University of Toronto. Hannah Riley Bowles: Hannah Riley Bowles is the Roy E. Larsen Senior Lecturer in Public Policy and Management at Harvard Kennedy School (HKS). Hannah chairs HKS Management, Leadership, and Decision Sciences (MLD) Area and co-directs the HKS Women and Public Policy Program (WAPPP). She is a leading expert on how gender influences pay negotiations and more broadly on negotiation as a micro-mechanism of inequality. Her current research focuses on women's leadership advancement, examining both situational barriers and individual strategies. Her research appears in academic publications, such as the Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Organization Science, Psychological Science, and Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
    [Show full text]
  • The Participation of Ethnic Minorities in Public Affairs: a Case Study of the Batwa in Uganda By
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012). Title of the thesis or dissertation (Doctoral Thesis / Master’s Dissertation). Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/102000/0002 (Accessed: 22 August 2017). THE PARTICIPATION OF ETHNIC MINORITIES IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS: A CASE STUDY OF THE BATWA IN UGANDA BY PAUL MULINDWA Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Litterarum et Philosphiae (D.Litt. et Phil) in Political Studies in South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI): African Diplomacy and Foreign Policy Faculty of Humanities Department of Politics and International Relations University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa Supervisor: Professor Chris Landsberg Co-supervisor: Professor Mzukisi Qobo 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The successful completion of this doctoral study required significant collaboration and assistance from people around me. I will take a moment to appreciate some of them here. From the onset, I praise God Almighty for His love and blessings as I wandered in the academic wilderness, arriving finally at this thesis. I profoundly appreciate my supervisor Professor Chris Landsberg for the direction, encouragement, and financial support during my study.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Worried Mothers:" a Panel of 'Ordinary South Africans' on US Capitol Hill
    “We Are Worried Mothers:" A Panel of 'Ordinary South Africans' on US Capitol Hill Myra Ann Houser Ouachita Baptist University Word Count: 6991 Abstract: In 1986, a “panel of ordinary South Africans” addressed the United States Congress. Their visit did not command as much attention as that of future president Nelson Mandela in 1990 or of past prime minister Jan Smuts in 1930. Yet, for an increasing number of Americans watching closely, it represented a momentous public rebuttal to apartheid. The visit responded to ongoing celebrity protests and built public support for sanctions. While many Americans instigating ‘Designer Arrests’ believed they spoke for South Africans, in 1986, physicians, activists, and children who had faced detention spoke for themselves on foreign soil. Examination of the Southern Africa Project’s and Congressional records reveals that, while the embassy protests were catalytic, this panel of ‘ordinary South Africans’ on the Hill and, subsequently, on national and international television, provided public faces for anti-apartheid movements in ways that celebrities certainly could not. As such, it is necessary to examine the factors leading to the panel, its impact on US anti-apartheid politics, and places of connection with youth activism and celebrity protest generally. Keywords: Apartheid; US Congress; South Africa; Protest; Celebrity; Media; Social Change; Civil Rights In 1986, a group of “ordinary” South Africans gained celebrity status on US Capitol Hill. Significantly, the appearance contributed to a shift in how Americans viewed African representation. Within the context of the visit’s lead-up and its impact on US politics, the South Africans described as “ordinary” became extraordinary members of celebrity culture in their own right.
    [Show full text]
  • Redefining Human Rights Lawyering Through the Lens of Critical Theory
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2011 Redefining Human Rights Lawyering Through the Lens of Critical Theory: Lessons for Pedagogy and Practice Caroline Bettinger-López University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Davida Finger Loyola University N.O. College of Law Meetali Jain Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town JoNel Newman University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Sarah Paoletti University of Pennsylvania School of Law See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Caroline Bettinger-López, Davida Finger, Meetali Jain, JoNel Newman, Sarah Paoletti, and Deborah M. Weissman, Redefining Human Rights Lawyering Through the Lens of Critical Theory: Lessons for Pedagogy and Practice, 18 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 337 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Caroline Bettinger-López, Davida Finger, Meetali Jain, JoNel Newman, Sarah Paoletti, and Deborah M. Weissman This article is available at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles/ 267 Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy Volume XVIII, Number 3, Symposium Issue 2011 Redefining Human Rights Lawyering Through the Lens of Critical Theory: Lessons for Pedagogy and Practice Caroline Bettinger-Lopez, University of Miami School of Law, Human Rights Clinic Davida Finger, Loyola University N.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 854-2651 [email protected] COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL, New
    SARAH H. CLEVELAND COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL 435 W. 116th St. New York, N.Y. 10027 (212) 854-2651 [email protected] PRESENT EMPLOYMENT & PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL, New York, NY. Louis Henkin Professor of Human and Constitutional Rights; Faculty Co-Director of the Human Rights Institute. Teaching and research in international and comparative human rights, international law, foreign affairs and the U.S. Constitution, national security law, and federal civil procedure. Board Member, Columbia University Global Policy Initiative (Since 2013). Board of Directors, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (Since 2007). UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, Geneva, Switzerland. U.S. independent expert on the United Nations Human Rights Committee, the treaty body overseeing state implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Elected in June 2014 by states parties to the Covenant to serve four-year term commencing Jan. 2015. Special Rapporteur for Follow-up with states regarding concluding observations (2015-2017); Special Rapporteur for New Communications (Since 2017). EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION). Independent Member on the Council of Europe’s expert advisory body on human rights and rule of law reform. Assist with evaluating the compatibility of national laws and constitutional reforms in Europe, North Africa, Latin America, and elsewhere. Member, and Vice Chair of Sub- Commission on the Rule of Law and Sub-Commission on Federal States (Since 2013). Observer Member (Oct. 2010-April 2013). AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, COORDINATING REPORTER, RESTATEMENT (FOURTH) OF THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES. Co-Coordinating Reporter directing and overseeing preparation of major treatise on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
    A/73/18 United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Ninety-third session (31 July–25 August 2017) Ninety-fourth session (20 November–8 December 2017) Ninety-fifth session (23 April–11 May 2018) General Assembly Official Records Seventy-third Session Supplement No. 18 A/73/18 General Assembly Official Records Seventy-third Session Supplement No. 18 Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Ninety-third session (31 July–25 August 2017) Ninety-fourth session (20 November–8 December 2017) Ninety-fifth session (23 April–11 May 2018) United Nations • New York, 2018 Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. A/73/18 Contents Page Letter of transmittal ....................................................................................................................... 1 I. Organizational and related matters ................................................................................................ 3 A. States parties to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination ....................................................................................................... 3 B. Sessions and agendas ............................................................................................................ 3 C. Membership .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 67735 HRI Report-Web.Indd
    Human RigHts institute Columbia Law School annual RepoRt 2011–2012 table of Contents Director’s Letter . i Human Rights Institute Initiatives . 1 Counterterrorism & Human Rights . 1 Human Rights in the United States . 3 Human Rights in the Global Economy . 6 Additional Initiatives . 8 Select events . 10 Continuing Legal Education Trainings . 10 Conference & Workshops . 11 BHRH Lawyers’ Network Meetings . 14 Speaker Series . 15 Publications . 16 Spotlight on Alumni . 17 Faculty and Staff . 18 DeaR alumni, Colleagues anD FrienDs of Human RigHts at Columbia law School Greetings from Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute . We are proud to share our first annual report and our remarkable accomplishments from the past year . The Human Rights Institute sits at the heart of human rights teaching, practice and scholarship at the Law School . Founded in 1998 by the late Professor Louis Henkin, the Institute draws on the Law School’s deep human rights tradition to support and influence human rights practice in the United States and throughout the world . In the past several years, the Institute and the Human Rights Clinic have become increasingly integrated, enabling us to multiply our impact on the field and engage students more fully in our work . Over the years, HRI has deepened its expertise along three primary axes: (i) Human Rights in the United States, (ii) Counterterrorism and Human Rights and (iii) Human Rights and the Global Econ- omy . Our U .S .-oriented work builds upon Louis Henkin’s commitment that human rights be honored at home, not simply abroad . Our counterterrorism work seeks to ensure that basic rule of law pro- tections are honored in the search for domestic and global security .
    [Show full text]
  • African American Women Leaders in the Civil Rights Movement: a Narrative Inquiry Janet Dewart Bell Antioch University - Phd Program in Leadership and Change
    Antioch University AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses Dissertations & Theses 2015 African American Women Leaders in the Civil Rights Movement: A Narrative Inquiry Janet Dewart Bell Antioch University - PhD Program in Leadership and Change Follow this and additional works at: https://aura.antioch.edu/etds Part of the African American Studies Commons, American Studies Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Leadership Studies Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Bell, Janet Dewart, "African American Women Leaders in the Civil Rights Movement: A Narrative Inquiry" (2015). Dissertations & Theses. 211. https://aura.antioch.edu/etds/211 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses at AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses by an authorized administrator of AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN LEADERS IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT: A NARRATIVE INQUIRY JANET DEWART BELL A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Ph.D. in Leadership and Change Program of Antioch University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May, 2015 This is to certify that the Dissertation entitled: AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN LEADERS IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT: A NARRATIVE INQUIRY prepared by Janet Dewart Bell is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Leadership and Change.
    [Show full text]