DOCSLIB.ORG

854-2651 [email protected] COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL, New

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
854-2651 Scleve@Law.Columbia.Edu COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL, New SARAH H. CLEVELAND COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL 435 W. 116th St. New York, N.Y. 10027 (212) 854-2651 [email protected] PRESENT EMPLOYMENT & PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL, New York, NY. Louis Henkin Professor of Human and Constitutional Rights; Faculty Co-Director of the Human Rights Institute. Teaching and research in international and comparative human rights, international law, foreign affairs and the U.S. Constitution, national security law, and federal civil procedure. Board Member, Columbia University Global Policy Initiative (Since 2013). Board of Directors, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (Since 2007). UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, Geneva, Switzerland. U.S. independent expert on the United Nations Human Rights Committee, the treaty body overseeing state implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Elected in June 2014 by states parties to the Covenant to serve four-year term commencing Jan. 2015. Special Rapporteur for Follow-up with states regarding concluding observations (2015-2017); Special Rapporteur for New Communications (Since 2017). EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION). Independent Member on the Council of Europe’s expert advisory body on human rights and rule of law reform. Assist with evaluating the compatibility of national laws and constitutional reforms in Europe, North Africa, Latin America, and elsewhere. Member, and Vice Chair of Sub- Commission on the Rule of Law and Sub-Commission on Federal States (Since 2013). Observer Member (Oct. 2010-April 2013). AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, COORDINATING REPORTER, RESTATEMENT (FOURTH) OF THE FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES. Co-Coordinating Reporter directing and overseeing preparation of major treatise on U.S. foreign relations law; also serving as a Reporter on Status of Treaties in U.S. Domestic Law (Since 2012). INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS, Geneva, Switzerland. Commissioner (elected 2018). U.S. GOVERNMENT SERVICE SECRETARY OF STATE’S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL LAW, U.S. Dept. of State Member, (Since Sept. 2011). COUNSELOR ON INTERNATIONAL LAW TO THE LEGAL ADVISER, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State. Helped supervise the legal work of the U.S. State Department, including assisting in developing State Department positions in the interagency and U.S. positions before the Human Rights Council and other UN and regional bodies. Helped to oversee legal work relating to human rights and international justice, and U.S. domestic litigation involving international law and foreign relations issues. From July 2010-Aug. 2011, also served as the supervising deputy for the State Department’s legal work involving Political/Military Affairs (including counterterrorism and laws of war) and Central and Southeast Asia (including Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka) (Sept. 2009 – Aug. 2011). ATTORNEY-ADVISER INTERNATIONAL (EXPERT), U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Provided pro bono expert legal assistance on international and foreign relations law matters to the Office of the Legal Adviser. (Sept. 2011-Jan. 2013). U.S. - CHINA LEGAL EXPERTS DIALOGUE. Participated as an expert member of U.S. delegation for dialogue with representatives of the Chinese government on pressing rule of law questions facing both countries. Presented for the United States delegation on counterterrorism and the protection of human rights in the U.S. and China. Beijing, China (April 2012). Presented on the role of government lawyers, Charlottesville, VA (November 2013). EDUCATION YALE LAW SCHOOL, New Haven, CT. J.D. (1992). Senior Editor, Yale L. & Pol. Rev., 1991-92. Mary McCarthy Fellowship in Public Interest Law, 1992. Charles G. Alborn Prize for Excellence in Appellate Advocacy, 1992 (co-recipient). Annual Human Rights Award, American Immigration Lawyers' Ass'n., 1992 (co-recipient). LINCOLN COLLEGE, OXFORD UNIVERSITY, England. Rhodes Scholar 1987-89. M.St. in British Imperial & Commonwealth History (July 1989). BROWN UNIVERSITY, Providence, RI. Honors A.B. Magna Cum Laude (1987). Independent Concentration in Law & Mental Health. Senior Class Commencement Orator. Junior Phi Beta Kappa. CLERKSHIPS SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, Washington, D.C. Law clerk to Associate Justice Harry A. Blackmun (1993-1994). UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Washington, D.C. Law clerk to Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer (1992-93). TEACHING EXPERIENCE SENIOR RESEARCHER, UNIVERSITY PANTHÉON-ASSAS (PARIS II), Dept. of Law, Paris, France (2017-18). VISITING PROFESSOR, UNIVERSITY PANTHÉON-ASSAS (PARIS II), Dept. of Law, Paris, France (Spring 2017). VISITING PROFESSOR, GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, Geneva, Switzerland (Spring, Fall 2017) VISITING PROFESSOR, SCIENCES-PO UNIVERSITY, Dept. of Law, Paris, France (Fall 2016). COLUMBIA SUMMER PROGRAM, UNIVERSITY OF LEIDEN, Netherlands (July 2016), 2 VISITING SCHOLAR, EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, Fiesole, Italy (March – April 2012; June 2015). OXFORD UNIVERSITY AND GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY JOINT PROGRAM IN INT’L HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, New College, Oxford (July 2006; July 2007). HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Cambridge, MA. Bemis Visiting Professor of International Law (2006-2007). COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL, Samuel Rubin Visiting Professor of Law (2005-2006). UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL, Visiting Professor (Fall 2004). UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW, Austin, TX. Marrs McLean Professor in Law (2001- 2007); Assistant Professor (1997-2000); Professor of Law (2000-2001). Faculty Director, Transnational Worker Rights Clinic (2004-2007) (led labor rights research mission to Cambodia, Spring 2005); Co-Founder, Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice (2004). OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE EXTERNAL LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP, KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN. Part of a five-member team of international lawyers retained to provide independent external legal advice to the government of Bahrain on implementation of the recommendations of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry (Jan.-March 2012). ASPEN INSTITUTE/NYU-COLUMBIA FEDERAL JUDICIAL TRAINING SEMINARS on “International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Their Application in Domestic Jurisprudence.” Instructor on international human rights law at seminars for U.S. federal and state judges. (Nov. 2007; May 2008; Jan. 2009; Jan. 2012; Nov. 2016; Feb. 2018). PROJECT ON HARMONIZING STANDARDS FOR ARMED CONFLICT. Co-director of transnational expert project examining potential reforms to the law of non-international armed conflict, with Daniel Bethlehem, former Legal Adviser to the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office (Jan. 2012-2016). WORKING GROUP ON DETENTION WITHOUT TRIAL, co-founder and coordinator of academic working group exploring legal and policy issues surrounding detention of terrorism suspects (July 2008-Aug. 2009). AFGHANISTAN TRANSITIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW PROJECT WORKING GROUP. Expert on ABA- sponsored project which drafted an employment code for post-Taliban Afghanistan (2003). ERLENBORN COMMISSION, LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION. Appointed to five-member federal commission reviewing the provision of legal assistance to aliens in the United States (1999). FLORIDA LEGAL SERVICES, Belle Glade, FL. Skadden Fellow. Conducted civil impact litigation on behalf of Caribbean H-2A sugar cane cutters and other migrant farmworkers in southeastern U.S. (1994-96). AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA, West Palm Beach, FL. Cooperating attorney on broad constitutional rights litigation docket (1994-96). 3 LOWENSTEIN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS CLINIC, Yale Law School, New Haven, CT. Co- director of student litigation effort on behalf of Haitian refugees in federal challenge to the United States interdiction program. Assisted in researching and drafting briefs for district, circuit, and Supreme courts; testified before U.S. Congress; conducted discovery on U.S. Naval Base, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (1992). SCHELL CENTER FOR INT'L. HUMAN RIGHTS: RESEARCH PROJECT IN NAMIBIA (Summer 1990). UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES, Geneva, Switzerland. (Summer 1990). COMMISSION ON THE SKILLS OF THE AMERICAN WORKFORCE, Nat'l. Center on Education & the Economy, Rochester, N.Y. Responsible for comparative European research (1989 -1990). LEGISLATIVE TESTIMONY House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights. Written evidence on the state secrets doctrine, Report on The Justice and Security Green Paper, HL Paper 286 HC 1777 (24th Report of Session 2010–12) (April 2012), List of Written Evidence, JS-29 (April 2012). United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Hearing on the Legal, Moral and National Security Consequences of “Prolonged Detention” (June 2009). House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Hearing on House Res. 97 and the Appropriate Role of Foreign Judgments in the Interpretation of American Law (July 2005). Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security of the House Committee on Government Operations, Hearing on U.S. Human Rights Policy Toward Haiti, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 97 (1992). PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP POSITIONS International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute, Council Member (Since 2013). Advisory Board, Institute of International Peace and Security Law, University of Cologne, Germany (Since 2015). American Law Institute, Member (Since 2007). Co-Coordinating Reporter, Restatement (Fourth) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, Reporter on Restatement Treaties Project (Since 2012). American Society of International Law
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Terrorism and Whistleblowing
    Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 2007 On Terrorism and Whistleblowing Michael P. Scharf Case Western Reserve University - School of Law, [email protected] Colin T. McLaughlin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Repository Citation Scharf, Michael P. and McLaughlin, Colin T., "On Terrorism and Whistleblowing" (2007). Faculty Publications. 1060. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/1060 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. ON TERRORISM AND WHSTLEBLOWING MichaelP. Schar! & Colin T. McLaughlin' At a Bio-Terrorism Conference at Case Western Reserve University School of Law on March 31, 2006, the government participants were asked what they would do if a superior instructed them not to disclose in- formation to the public about the likely grave health affects of an ongoing bio-terrorist attack. In response, they indicated that they would be reluc- tant to become a "whistleblower." This is not surprisingsince, despite the federal and state laws that purport to facilitate such whistleblowingfor the public good, government whistleblowers routinely have faced loss of pro- motion, harassment,firing, and in some instances criminal prosecution when they have gone public with their important information. Yet, without government whistleblowers who had the courage to go to the press, the public would never have learned about Watergate, the Iran-Contrascan- dal, the inhumane practices at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, the secretpris- ons run by the United States in Eastern Europe, or the NSA policy of wire- tappingAmericans without warrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Council and Participants
    The American Law Institute OFFICERS * Roswell B. Perkins, President Edward T. Gignoux, 1st Vice President Charles Alan Wright, 2nd Vice President Bennett Boskey, Treasurer Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., Director Paul A. Wolkin, Executive Vice President COUNCIL * Shirley S. Abrahamson Madison Wisconsin Philip S. Anderson Little Rock Arkansas Richard Sheppard Arnold Little Rock Arkansas Frederick A. Ballard Alexandria Virginia Bennett Boskey Washington District of Columbia Michael Boudin Washington District of Columbia Hugh Calkins Cleveland Ohio Gerhard Casper Chicago Illinois William T. Coleman, Jr. Washington District of Columbia Roger C. Cramton Ithaca New York Lloyd N. Cutler Washington District of Columbia R. Ammi Cutter** Cambridge Massachusetts William H. Erickson Denver Colorado Thomas E. Fairchild Madison Wisconsin Jefferson B. Fordham Salt Lake City Utah John P. Frank Phoenix Arizona George Clemon Freeman, Jr. Richmond Virginia Edward T. Gignoux Portland Maine Ruth Bader Ginsburg Washington District of Columbia Erwin N. Griswold Washington District of Columbia Conrad K. Harper New York New York Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr. Greenville South Carolina Vester T. Hughes, Jr. Dallas Texas Joseph F. Johnston Birmingham Alabama Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Morristown New Jersey Herma Hill Kay Berkeley California Pierre N. Leval New York New York Edward Hirsch Levi Chicago Illinois Betsy Levin Washington District of Columbia Hans A. Linde Salem Oregon Martin Lipton New York New York *As of December 1, 1987 ** Chairman Emeritus OFFICERS AND COUNCIL Robert MacCrate New York New York Hale McCown Lincoln Nebraska Carl McGowan Washington District of Columbia Vincent L. McKusick Portland Maine Robert H. Mundheim Philadelphia Pennsylvania Roswell B. Perkins New York New York Ellen Ash Peters Hartford Connecticut Louis H.
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
    United Nations CCPR/SP/89 International Covenant on Distr.: General 7 May 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Meeting of States parties Thirty-sixth meeting New York, 14 June 2018 Item 5 of the provisional agenda Election, in accordance with articles 28–34 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, of nine members of the Human Rights Committee to replace those whose terms are due to expire on 31 December 2018 Election of nine members of the Human Rights Committee to replace those whose terms are due to expire on 31 December 2018 Note by the Secretary-General 1. In conformity with articles 28 to 32 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the thirty-sixth meeting of States parties to the Covenant is to be held at United Nations Headquarters on 14 June 2018 for the purpose of electing nine members of the Human Rights Committee from a list of persons nominated by States parties (sect. II), to replace those whose terms of office will expire on 31 December 2018 (sect. I). I. Members of the Committee whose terms will expire on 31 December 2018 Name of member Country of nationality Mr. Yadh Ben Achour Tunisia Ms. Sarah Cleveland United States of America Mr. Olivier de Frouville France Mr. Yuji Iwasawa Japan Ms. Ivana Jelić Montenegro Mr. Duncan Laki Muhumuza Uganda Ms. Photini Pazartzis Greece Mr. Mauro Politi Italy Ms. Margo Waterval Suriname GE.18-07172 (E) 220518 230518 CCPR/SP/89 II. Persons nominated by States parties 2. In accordance with article 30 (2) of the Covenant, the Secretary-General, in a note verbale dated 15 December 2017, invited the States parties to submit, in conformity with article 29 of the Covenant, their nominations for the election of nine members of the Committee by 9 April 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence As a Human Rights Violation Caroline Bettinger-López University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2008 Human Rights at Home: Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Violation Caroline Bettinger-López University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Caroline Bettinger-López, Human Rights at Home: Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Violation, 42 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 581 (2008). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS AT HOME: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION Caroline Bettinger-L6pez* On March 2, 2007, Jessica Lenahan (formerly Gonzales)1 spoke at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Washington, D.C. about why she thought the United States was responsible for human rights violations against her and her deceased children. Before four commissioners, a U.S. State Department delegation, and members of the general public, she testified about how local police in Colorado refused to enforce a domestic violence restraining order against her estranged husband in 1999, and how her three daughters were tragically killed as a result. She discussed how her federal lawsuit against the police wound its way to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Nations Obey International Law?
    Review Essay Why Do Nations Obey International Law? The New Sovereignty: Compliance with InternationalRegulatory Agreements. By Abram Chayes" and Antonia Handler Chayes.*" Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995. Pp. xii, 404. $49.95. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. By Thomas M. Franck.- Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. Pp. 500. $55.00. Harold Hongju Koh Why do nations obey international law? This remains among the most perplexing questions in international relations. Nearly three decades ago, Louis Henkin asserted that "almost all nations observe almost all principles of international law and almost all of their obligations almost all of the time."' Although empirical work since then seems largely to have confirmed this hedged but optimistic description,2 scholars Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, Harvard Law School ** President, Consensus Building Institute. Murray and Ida Becker Professor of Law; Director. Center for International Studtcs. New York University School of Law. t Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law; Director. Orville H, Schell, Jr., Center for International Human Rights, Yale University. Thts Essay sketches arguments to be fleshed out in a forthcoming book, tentatively entitled WHY NATIONS OBEY: A THEORY OF COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW. Parts of this Review Essay derive from the 1997 \Vaynflete Lectures. Magdalen College, Oxford University, and a brief book review of the Chayeses volume in 91 Am. J. INT'L L. (forthcoming 1997). 1 am grateful to Glenn Edwards, Jessica Schafer. and Douglas Wolfe for splendid research assistance, and to Bruce Ackerman, Peter Balsam, Geoffrey Brennan. Paul David, Noah Feldman. Roger Hood, Andrew Hurrell, Mark Janis, Paul Kahn, Benedict Kingsbury, Tony Kronran.
    [Show full text]
  • James B. Steinberg – “Deep Dive”
    JAMES B. STEINBERG – “DEEP DIVE” I. Introduction James Braidy Steinberg is the current dean of the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs of the University of Texas. He served as Deputy National Security Advisor and Director of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff under President Clinton. Steinberg produced the completed questionnaire and attachments, the completed SF 86, the completed OGE 4501, his 401k and investment reports, federal tax returns from 2005-07, and a District of Columbia tax return for part of 2005. Steinberg indicated that because there is no state income tax in Texas, he did not file state tax returns for the remainder of 2005 and 2006-07 (during his residency in Texas). Because Steinberg was not able to travel to Washington during the time allotted for this assignment, Team Leader Robert Wilkins traveled to Austin and interviewed him on October 30 in a suite at the Courtyard Marriott adjacent to the airport. The interview took place at 2:30 pm and lasted approximately two hours. II. Comment on Public Vet Memo The Public Vet memo deals with Steinberg's public record fairly comprehensively, and it accurately captures the subjects it covers. (One small nit – the Public Vet memo inaccurately describes him as maintaining “an active DC bar license”; his bar membership is actually on “inactive” status.) The Public Vet memo does not, however, address three potentially controversial issues that are reported in the media and other public sources: the Gilbert Chagoury meeting, the accusation of treason by Navy Lt. Commander Jack Daly, and the Clinton administration’s purported failure to detain Osama bin Laden in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Dimension of RFRA. Gerald L
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 1997 The Global Dimension of RFRA. Gerald L. Neuman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Neuman, Gerald L., "The Global Dimension of RFRA." (1997). Constitutional Commentary. 375. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/375 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GLOBAL DIMENSION OF RFRA Gerald L. Neuman* A multi-faceted controversy is currently raging over the con­ stitutionality of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA),t the federal legislative response to the Supreme Court's decision in Employment Division v. Smith.z In Smith, the Supreme Court eliminated most constitutional claims to religious exemption from generally applicable laws, abandoning a prior practice of subjecting such claims (verbally at least) to a compel­ ling interest test. The majority asserted that the Free Exercise Clause does not require state or federal governments to accom­ modate conscientious objectors to compliance with generally ap­ plicable laws. Congress, in turn, emphasized that "laws 'neutral' toward religion may burden religious exercise as surely as laws intended to interfere with religious exercise," and acted to "re­ store the compelling interest test" as a matter of statutory right.3 Congress's authority to enact such a statute, particularly as applied to generally applicable laws of the states, has been dis­ puted.
    [Show full text]
  • What Role for the Cia's General Counsel
    Sed Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes: The CIA’s Office of General Counsel? A. John Radsan* After 9/11, two officials at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) made decisions that led to major news. In 2002, one CIA official asked the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) to clarify how aggressive CIA interrogators could be in questioning al Qaeda operatives held overseas.1 This request led to the August 2002 memorandum, later leaked, in which John Yoo argued that an interrogator crosses the line into torture only by inflicting pain on a par with organ failure.2 Yoo further suggested that interrogators would have many defenses, justifications, and excuses if they faced possible criminal charges.3 One commentator described the advice as that of a “mob lawyer to a mafia don on how to skirt the law and stay out of prison.”4 To cool the debate about torture, the Bush administration retracted the memorandum and replaced it with another.5 The second decision was made in 2003, when another CIA official asked the Justice Department to investigate possible misconduct in the disclosure to the media of the identity of a CIA employee. The employee was Valerie Plame, a covert CIA analyst and the wife of Ambassador Joseph Wilson. * Associate Professor of Law, William Mitchell College of Law. The author was a Justice Department prosecutor from 1991 until 1997, and Assistant General Counsel at the Central Intelligence Agency from 2002 until 2004. He thanks Paul Kelbaugh, a veteran CIA lawyer in the Directorate of Operations, for thoughtful comments on an early draft, and Erin Sindberg Porter and Ryan Check for outstanding research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • MILITANT LIBERALISM and ITS DISCONTENTS: on the DECOLONIAL ORIGINS of ENDLESS WAR a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty Of
    MILITANT LIBERALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS: ON THE DECOLONIAL ORIGINS OF ENDLESS WAR A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Aaron B Gavin December 2017 © 2017 Aaron B Gavin MILITANT LIBERALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS: ON THE DECOLONIAL ORIGINS OF ENDLESS WAR Aaron B Gavin, Ph. D. Cornell University 2017 MILITANT LIBERALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS tells a story about the reinvention of liberalism during the era of decolonization. The dissertation shows how a persistent pattern of militant liberalism came to structure the postwar international order—one where the United States engages in militant action to protect the liberal international order from irredeemable illiberal threats, precisely when its hegemonic influence reaches its limit. While anti-totalitarianism and the war on terror are defining episodes in the development of this pattern, the dissertation argues that it was only liberalism’s encounter with decolonization that made the practice of militant liberalism ideologically coherent and enduring. After shattering the civilizational justifications of nineteenth century liberalism, decolonization provided militant liberals with a unique enemy, the Third World, upon which to distinguish and legitimate their own logic of violence, all while destroying alternative political possibilities arising out of the decolonial process. The dissertation explores these themes through four political thinkers—Isaiah Berlin, Louis Henkin, Frantz Fanon, and Carl Schmitt—and narrates a story about the legitimation of militant liberalism and the eventual rise of its discontents. On the one hand, Berlin and Henkin spoke of Thirdworldism as uniquely threatening: the former arguing that Thirdworldist nationalism often morphed into romantic self-assertion, and the latter claiming that Thirdworldists exploited state sovereignty allowing international terrorism to proliferate unbound.
    [Show full text]
  • APA MAGAZINE the Magazine for the Polygraph Professional
    APA MAGAZINE The Magazine for the Polygraph Professional Dr. Tim Weber, Editor In this Issue May/June 2008 Volume 41,3 2008 APA Annual Seminar Schedule, p. 16 APA President reports on the results of the first mail-in ballot election, p. 34 APA Magazine 2008, 41(3) 1 AMERICAN International INSTITUTE OF POLYGRAPH Accredited by the American Polygraph Association Recognized by the American Association of Police Polygraphists WHEN QUALITY COUNTS! Professional Polygraph Examiner Training. Curriculum and training methods based on Federal training and experience with the US Army Criminal Investigations Command and the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute. Training programs have an overall objective of providing the knowledge, skills and ability to professionally administer polygraph exams. Schedule 1: TRADITIONAL TEN (10) WEEKS IN RESIDENCE Schedule 2: EIGHT (8) WEEKS IN RESIDENCE & 2 WEEKS INTERNSHIP ● We provide polygraph equipment for training. Try it before you buy it. Lafayette LX4000 Axciton Stoelting CPS II Limestone Polygraph Professional Suite ● Experienced faculty using effective training methods. Less talk, more action. ● Video recorded laboratory exercises. Learn by doing. 2008 Class Start Dates January 7 March 17 April 21 September 8 Lafayette, IN 8 weeks Director & Primary Instructor– Charles (Chuck) E. Slupski Army CID Examiner (1983 – 1996) / DOD Polygraph Institute Instructor (1992 – 1996) Primary Instructor – Allan E. Stein Army CID Examiner & Polygraph Instructor at US Army Polygraph School NEW FACILITY. Great location
    [Show full text]
  • JD Columbia Law School 1965 AB Columbia College 1962 Bar
    BERNARD H. OXMAN Office: Home: School of Law TEL: 305 284 2293 10 Edgewater Drive (9H) University of Miami FAX: 305 284 6619 Coral Gables, FL 33133 Coral Gables, FL 33124-8087 <[email protected]> TEL: 305 443 9550 Education: J.D. Columbia Law School 1965 A.B. Columbia College 1962 Bar Admissions: District of Columbia, New York Employment: University of Miami School of Law, 1977-present Richard A. Hausler Professor of Law, 2008 to present Professor of Law, 1980-present Director, Maritime Law Program, 1997-present University Faculty Senator, 1996-2008; 2009-2017 Associate Dean, 1987-90 Associate Professor, 1977-80 Subjects taught regularly: conflict of laws, international law, law of the sea, torts AJIL: American Journal of International Law Co-Editor in Chief, 2003-2013 International Decisions Editor, 1998-2003 Board of Editors 1986-present Adjudication, Judge ad hoc, International Court of Justice: Arbitration, Black Sea Maritime Delimitation case (Romania v. Ukraine), Review Panel: 2006-2009 Judge ad hoc, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Land Reclamation case (Malaysia v. Singapore), 2003 Bay of Bengal Maritime Delimitation case (Bangladesh v. Myanmar), 2010-2012 Indian Ocean Maritime Delimitation case (Mauritius/Maldives), 2019- Member, Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Land Reclamation case (Malaysia v. Singapore) (2003-2005) ARA Libertad case (Argentina v. Ghana) (2013) Chair, Review Panel Established under Article 17 and Annex II of the Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in the South Pacific Ocean Objection of the Russian Federation to CMM 1.01 (2013) Arbitrator, various international commercial arbitrations Counsel for the Philippines in South China Sea arbitration (Phil.
    [Show full text]