Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage Free

Home , Henry Watson Fowler, Robert Burchfield

FREE FOWLERS DICTIONARY OF MODERN ENGLISH USAGE PDF

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Ernest A. Gowers Editor. It covers topics such as plurals and literary technique, distinctions among like Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage homonyms and synonymsand the use of foreign terms. This book is intended for general; students and teachers of English; anyone wanting guidance on the correct use of English. Get A Copy. Paperbackpages. More Details Original Title. Other Editions Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 4. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Nov 23, Rachel rated it liked it Recommends it for: users of english. Shelves: nonfiction. Although I Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage not find this book truly useful, I do find it amusing. Here is the part about French words: Display of superior knowledge is as great a vulgarity as display of superior wealth -- greater indeed, inasmuch as knowledge should tend more definitely than wealth towards discretion and good manners. That is the guiding principle alike in the using and in the pronouncing of French words in English writing and talk. To use French words that your reader or hearer does not understand, to pron Although I do not find this book truly useful, I do find it amusing. To use French words that your reader or hearer does not understand, to pronounce them as if you were one of the Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage few to whom French is second nature when he is not one of those few and it is ten thousand to one that neither you Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage he will beis inconsiderate and rude. View all 3 comments. Sep 13, Stephen rated it really liked it Shelves: easton-pressreference. This is on the short list of the best reference books around. It is not accurate to say that I have "read" this entire book but I have been using it fairly extensively since I acquired it in as part of an 8 volume leather bound set from Easton Press Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage the "Complete Oxford Reference Set. Mar 17, Daniel rated it really liked it Shelves: books-about-writing. Fowler's "Modern English Usage" is one of those books that really has no business existing: a reference guide that's fun to read. You could spend hours flipping from entry to entry -- especially since many of the entries make reference to others -- discovering all the mistakes you've been making in your writing over the years. Because H. Fowler was incredibly opinionated check out his stance, for example, on the use of "preface" vs. Perhaps the modern revisions which I'm unfamiliar with -- I was lucky enough to find an edition from the '20s are more functional, but they couldn't possibly be any more Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Jan 27, Bob Nichols rated it did not like it. This book has a few gems to educate the reader on the history of usage and to correct some common misunderstandings and mistakes. But these are hidden in a mass of detail. The book is plagued with the following defects: 1 too often Fowler takes forever, if ever, to make his point and, even then, his point is not frequently clear; 2 on the issue of clarity, Fowler lapses into his own considerable jargon so that, for example, "'of' is here not partitive but appositional" and it is even now more This book has a few gems to educate the reader on the history of usage and to correct some common misunderstandings and mistakes. Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage book is plagued with the following defects: 1 too often Fowler takes forever, if ever, to make his point and, even then, his point is not frequently clear; 2 on the issue of clarity, Fowler lapses into his own considerable jargon so that, for example, "'of' is here not partitive but appositional" and it is even now more understandable why students hate English; 3 he occasionally goes off on what seems to be his own exercise in rank e. In reading some of the reviews of this book, it is understandable why many do appreciate what Fowler has done. To read through pages of dictionary style treatment on usage generally would require that level of appreciation. But as a general guide for those not so enthused with all this detail, Fowler seems dated recent, not modern, Englishand overly obsessive and obscure. He would go nuts today's computer age. If two thirds of his book were eliminated, it would be a valuable reference guide, but then it wouldn't be Fowler either. Aug 11, Simon rated it it was amazing. Fowler is truly the most english of englishmen. This is a righteously indignant, uptight, catty look at how language should and shouldn't be used. While the second edition was mildly updated in by Sir Ernest Gowers, it remains in essence a turn of the century work. Just plain fun to read. Jun 20, Sammy rated it really liked it Shelves: non-fiction. I have to agree with the more erudite reviews already posted: in some ways, this is a 5-star Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage. In others, it's a write-off. As a writer myself, I find Fowler to be one of the pre-eminent reference texts. He covers a vast range of words and phrases - from the regularly misused to archaisms which, when they are used, need clarifying - with a wit that often borders on scathing. It's great fun to be searching for a simple definition or clarification, and end up having a good giggle at the same ti I have to agree with the more erudite reviews already posted: in some ways, this is a Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage work. It's great fun to be searching for a simple definition Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage clarification, and end up having a good giggle at the same time. Because the book was written in the 'glory days' of the early 20th century, Fowler takes time to explain his stance, without resorting to dumbing down the information. On the other hand, as other commentators have noted, one Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage the joys of the English language is its evolution. I believe that the history of a word is vitally important, that Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage more than simply competent in your language is a great gift, and thus am I against these dimwitted arguments to simplify our spelling, or limit our general vocabulary in academic institutions or the media. However, language is in a state of constant flux, and to argue that there is only ever one correct usage of a word or term is ridiculous. Something that was correct in for Fowler may be ludicrous for us inand may have been equally so for Elizabeth I, or Samuel Johnson, or Jane Austen. Beyond this, Fowler seems to be confused about the distinction between formal and informal language use. Is idomatic English to be held to the same standards as formal documents? Isn't one of the joys of being proficient in your language, that you can stretch the boundaries of meaning and definition - both in a parodic, conversational manner, and in a serious way? As with anyone who grows passionate about a subject that is steeped in tradition, I always feel torn in these situations: to revere Fowler for his wit, intelligence, and passion? Or bemoan him for being a pedant? The question lingers The edition was riveting, the sort of prose that seduces your snarky mind and infects your dreams. Logical, romantic, hilarious: the firmest virtues. This thick modern update is a bag of wind, a pail of Sominex. Consult it if you need to, but don't say I didn't warn you if the resulting narcolepsy puts you off your game. Years ago, I fell in love with Fowler's righteous wrath, his irony, his impeccable use of Oxford comma. Whenever I feel down, I open this book and read a random entry. Should you read it? Should you own it and peruse Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage every now and then? Spoilers below. His examples and turns of phrase are brilliant. Ever thought how you'd mix "touch pitch" and "defile" in the same sentence? There you go: superiority. Much misplaced ingenuity in finding forms of apology is shown by writers with Years ago, I fell in love with Fowler's righteous wrath, his irony, his impeccable use of Oxford comma. Much misplaced ingenuity in finding forms of apology is shown by writers with a sense of their own superiority who wish to safeguard their dignity and yet be Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage, to combine comfort with elegance, to touch pitch and not be defiled. Among them are: To use an expressive colloquialism—in the vernacular phrase—if the word may be permitted—so Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage speak—in homely phrase—not to put too fine a point upon it—if the word be not too vulgar—as they say—to call a spade a spade —not to mince matters—in the jargon of today— or the use of depreciatory inverted commas. Such writers should make up their minds whether their reputation or their style is such as to allow of their dismounting from the high horse now and again without compromising themselves. If they can do that, at all, they can dispense with apologies: if the apology is needed, the thing apologized for would be better away. A grievance once redressed ceases to be an electoral asset if we may use a piece of terminology which we confess we dislike. His fine distinctions give me a tingly sense of righteousness. I feel validated and vindicated: humanist. Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage - Henry Watson Fowler - Google книги

This world-famous guide to the Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage language has been cherished and consulted by writers, editors, academics, and anyone who values good writing, for its practical and reasoned guidance on grammar, style, punctuation, spelling, and word choice since it first appeared in The new edition — the first in 18 years — has been thoroughly but sensitively revised to reflect English usage in the 21st century, and offers a clear, authoritative, and enlightening picture of the English we use today. The entries are packed with usage examples, some from established literary figures such as Chinua Achebe, Raymond Carver, Iris Murdoch, Harold Pinter, and Vikram Seth, and others from a vast range of newspapers, journals, books, broadcast material, websites, and other digital sources from across the globe, and include references to topical personalities such as Stephen Fry, Prince Harry, Jeremy Paxman, and Wayne Rooney. Based on the evidence and research of the Oxford Dictionaries Programme, this is the most comprehensive and authoritative guide to usage available. Jeremy Butterfield, editor Jeremy Butterfield is a freelance lexicographer, language expert and writer, and an OUP author. For many years he worked in senior editorial positions in Collins English and Bilingual Dictionaries. Access to the complete content on Oxford Reference requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription. Please subscribe or login to access full text content. If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code. Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQsand if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single entry from a reference work in OR for personal use for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice. Oxford Reference. Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage Pages Publications Pages. Recently viewed 0 Save Search. Read More. All Contents Entries. Items per page: 10 A-Z to view, select the "Entries" tab. All rights reserved. Sign in to annotate. Delete Cancel Save. Cancel Save. Fowler’s Dictionary of Modern English Usage - Oxford Reference As a global organization, we, like many others, recognize the significant threat posed by the coronavirus. During this time, we have made some of our learning resources freely accessible. Our distribution centers are open and orders can be placed online. Do be advised that shipments may be delayed due to extra safety precautions implemented at our centers and delays with local shipping carriers. Oxford Reference. Available online as part of Oxford Reference - cross-search quality A-Z reference at the click of a button. Why literally shouldn't be taken literally. Why Americans think home in on something is a mistake and Brits think hone in is. Is it OK to spell OK okay? What's wrong with hence why? Was Alanis Morrisette ever ironic? Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage is the world-famous guide to English usage, loved and used by Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage, editors, and anyone who values correct English since it Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage appeared in Fowler's gives comprehensive Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage practical advice on complex points of grammar, syntax, punctuation, style, and word choice. Now enlarged and completely revised to reflect English usage in the 21st century, it provides a crystal-clear, authoritative picture of the English we use, while illuminating scores of usage questions old and new. The thousands of authentic examples in the book vividly demonstra. Jeremy Butterfield is an author, language expert, writer, and lexicographer. For many years he worked in senior editorial positions in Collins Dictionaries. Robert Burchfield was born in Wangannui, New Zealand. He edited the third and the revised third edition of Fowler's Modern English Usage. His distinguished lexicographical career included a number of key publications: The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymologywith C. Onions and G. Friedrichsen and The English Language Henry Watson Fowler worked as a teacher and freelance writer before going to Guernsey to form a remarkably successful writing partnership with his brother Francis. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Academic Skip to main content. Search Start Search. Choose your country or region Close. Dear Customer, As a global organization, we, like many others, recognize the significant threat posed by the coronavirus. Please contact our Customer Service Team if you have any questions. It can be ordered now for delivery when back in stock. To purchase, visit your preferred ebook provider. Oxford Reference Available online as Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage of Oxford Reference - cross-search quality A-Z reference at the click of a button. The thousands of authentic examples in the book vividly Fowlers Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Also of Interest. Damp Squid Jeremy Butterfield. The Arguments of Time Jeremy Butterfield. Messenger, Jan de Bruyn, Judy Brown