DOCSLIB.ORG

Westminsterresearch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Westminsterresearch WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch Religion and the legitimation of the state: the development of political thought in contemporary Shi’ism (Case study Iran 1979-2004) Tawfiq M. Alsaif School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Languages This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © The Author, 2005. This is a scanned reproduction of the paper copy held by the University of Westminster library. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Users are permitted to download and/or print one copy for non-commercial private study or research. Further distribution and any use of material from within this archive for profit-making enterprises or for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: (http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail repository@westminster.ac.uk RELIGION AND THE LEGITIMATION OF THE STATE The Development of Political Thought in Contemporary Shi'ism (Case Study: Iran 1979-2004) Tawfiq M. Alsaif A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2005 Contents Abstract 4 Acknowledgments 5 A Note on Transliteration 6 Introduction 7 Chapter I: The Foundation of the Doctrine of Authority in Shi`ism 14 The Foundations of Shi`ism 15 1-Karbala Tragedy: 16 2-The Legacy of Ja'far al-Sadiq 17 3- The Occultation of the Twelfth Imam 21 Post-Occultation Challenges 22 The First Approach to the Issue of Authority 24 The Emergence of the theory of Jurist's Guardianship 26 The Rise of the Safavid Dynasty 28 Towards the Twentieth Century 34 Conclusion 36 Chapter II : The Project of Ayatollah Khomeini 38 Consensusand Stability 40 Religion, State and Modernisation 41 The I ffccts of Social Change 46 The Impediments of an Out-dated Doctrine 49 The Primacy of the State 58 The Absolute Authority of the Fayih 59 Conclusion 61 Chapter III : The Rise of the Reformist Paradigm 64 The Revolutionary Paradigm 65 The Paradigm Shapes Up 73 The Paradigm in Action 76 The Fault-Line Emerges 89 The New Paradigm 98 Conclusion 104 Chapter IV : The Conservative Vision of the State 106 The Conservative Doctrine of Power 109 The Social System 114 2 Citizenship 120 Legitimacy and the Rule of Law 124 Republicanism and the Role of the People 127 The Conservative's Frame of Reference 131 Fiqh Sunnati 133 Conclusion 136 Chapter V: The Reformist View of the State 139 The Socio-economic Background 139 The Role of the Intellectuals 141 Main Figures and Themes in the Reformist Movement 145 Republicanism: the Question of Sovereignty 150 Political Legitimacy 153 Democracy 157 The Idea of `Religious Democracy 161 Religion and Democracy 164 The Reformists' Frame of Reference 166 Secularism 172 Conclusion 178 Chapter VI : The Composition of Political Factions 180 "1'lic Role of Political Groups 182 The Structure of Party Politics in Contemporary Iran 185 The Islamic Republic Party (IRP) 186 The Conservative Camp 189 The Reformist Camp 201 Conclusion 218 Conclusion 220 Adaptability 220 The Role of the Religion 222 The Process of Reconciliation 224 The Way Ahead 227 1- The Sovereignty of God 228 2-The role of the ulamä 229 3- Equality 231 Bibliography 238 3 Abstract Since the early 1990s, the Middle East has witnessed a renewed interest in the debate over the role of religion in thG process of democratization. This study aims to examine the possibility of developing a democratic discourse within the Islamic context. It focuses on the evolution of the political thought in Shi'i Islam in the context of Iran after the Islamic revolution of 1979. The reconciliation between religion and democracy is argued to be a two-phase process: in the first phase, religion is integrated into the state in order to bring about a consensual political system and engage the people in the political process. Then, the religious worldview is developed in line with democracy. The study examines the socio-economic factors behind the emergence of the reformist discourse in Iran in the mid-1990s. It also reviews the evolution of that discourse compared with its conservative rival and highlights their approximate to the principles of democracy. Emphasizing the practical side of religion, the thesis concludes that the community's perception and application of the religious teachings have varied over the history to reflect the changing realities of the social life, far from the claim of religion being a fixed order of dogmas. The past twenty-five years witnessed major steps towards adapting the religious values to the modem patterns of socialization and politics. It was set off by the need of unifying the religious and political authorities within the state system. Later, the process was driven by the structural transformations ensued from the revolution and the state policies during the 1980s. The final phase came through the reformist's strategy to democratize the Islamic regime in the late 1990s. My general conclusion is that despite the tremble of the political reform, considerable works have been done, particularly on the structural level. The experience of the reformist rule indicates the possibility of developing a model of democracy appropriate to the local culture, especially the religious beliefs. It also indicates the capacity of the Islamic Republic to develop a democratic character, at least on the long term. 4 Acknowledgments I wish to express my deep gratitude to my academic supervisor Dr. Abdelwahab El-Affendi without whose patience and guidance this study would not have been completed. My appreciation is also due to Dr. Ali Paya and Professor John Keane from whom I have learned a great deal. I thank also my uncle Dr. Abdul-Jalil Alsaif for his constant encouragement and support. I am indebted to many friends and colleagues who generously supported me throughout the last four years. To them all I express my deep appreciation and gratitude. 5 A Note on Transliteration The transliterations of names, terms, and places are based on the system used for the International Journal of Middle East Studies (INES). In this system, the rules for the Farsi words are similar to that of the Arabic ones except for few cases. I have tried my best however to make them as approximate as possible to the phonetic pronunciation. Names for which there are already established English spellings are spelled without diacritics. Names of authors who chose certain spelling in their published works were put according to their Arabic preferences. In the footnotes, I have used the original titles of Farsi and list books and articles to which I referred. The same rule is followed in the of sources, however with an English translation. 6 Introduction Since the Iranian revolution of 1979, the so-called political Islam has been a point of contention among the politicians and political theorists throughout the world. The phenomenal mobilization under the banner of Islam has been a challenge to a common assumption among the theorists of development suggesting that, with the course of modernization, religion will gradually lose its influence in the public arena. In the early 1980s, some five researchers predicted a short life for the Islamic revivalism. After twenty years, that assumption seems far from the realities on the ground. The surprising eruption of religious sentiments at that epoch has gradually evolved into a trans- national movement featuring at least one common character: that is the assertion of the involvement of the religion in national politics. Whether this sentiment humiliation represents a revival of a national identity, a reaction to the claimed at the hands of foreign powers, or a renewed conviction of the viability of the religious cure for the grievances of the Muslim societies, this phenomenon represents a provocative challenge to the study of politics. The broad religious trend combines a variety of trends including traditionalists, modernists, anarchists and others. Among those, one trend seems to have attracted less attention, that is the one which argues for the possibility of formulation a new discourse bringing together the major principles of democracy and Islam. This study aims to investigate the viability of this discourse, particularly with regard to its capability of dealing with the religious, cultural, and political barriers which have so far hindered the process of democratization in the Muslim societies. The study focuses on the discursive and doctrinal transformations within Sh19 Islam in Iran after the 1979 revolution in order to set an empirical framework for the analysis of the said possibility. 7 The Islamic Republic of Iran represents, as one scholar puts it, "an ever ' more interesting laboratory for observing political Islam in practice". This is partially due to the country has already experienced some aspects of modernity including a level of industrialization, constitutionalism, in addition to the fact that the Islamic regime has been brought about by a popular revolution. In such cases, society becomes intensely politicized and its desires profoundly influence the making of the new political system. The Islamic Republic has brought a set of traditional and religious-oriented concepts together with some modern ones, most of which were hitherto unfamiliar to the religious circles including republicanism, election, constitutional rights and so forth. It was assumed that such a combination would feature a profound and positive exchange between the religious-traditional and modern constituents, thus delivers a modern political order inspired by the religious values.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hossein Bashiriyeh CV
    CURRICULUM VITAE Hossein Bashiriyeh University of Syracuse Department of Political Science 408 Maxwell, Syracuse, NY 13266 Office: 315-443-3917 EDUCATION • Ph.D., Political Theory, Department of Political Theory and Institutions, University of Liverpool, England, 1979-1982. • M.A., Political Behavior, Department of Government, University of Essex, England, 1977-1979. • B.A., Political Science, Tehran University, 1972-76. (Obtained government scholarship grant for study abroad as top graduate); • ( Obtained highest grade in Nationwide Examinations for Admission to the Universities in the year 1351/1972) PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS Lecturer in Political Science: University of Syracuse, August 2006- present; Courses taught: Islamism and Islamist Movements Today; Middle Eastern Political Systems; History of Islamic Political Thought; Democratization in the Muslim World; Revolutions in the Middle East: Theory and History; Social Theory and the Middle East (Graduate Course). • Reagan-Fascell Academic Fellow, National Endowment for Democracy; Nov. 2005 to August 2006. (Project: “Preconditions of Democratization”, published in Persian as Transition to Democracy. Vol. II) • Professor, Department of Political Science, Tehran University, 1982-2005. Courses taught at undergraduate and graduate levels: Comparative Political Systems; Comparative Revolutions; Political Sociology; History of 20th Century Political Thought; Theories of Democratic Transitions; Political Sociology of Iran; (Supervision of 26 Ph.D. dissertations) Dean of Curriculum, College of Law and Political Science, Tehran University; 1988-91 PUBLICATIONS English Book: The State and Revolution in Iran (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984; reprinted in 2011). Persian Books: 1- Revolution and Political Mobilization. (Tehran: Tehran University Press, 1991); 2- Political Sociology: Role of Social Forces in Political Life. (Tehran: Nay Press, 1993); 3- History of Political Thought in the 20th Century [2 volumes]; vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives of the Ulemas Buried in the Holy City Of
    Ulema buried in the Holy City of Qom 2 (In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful) Foreword The Holy Prophet − said: "There are two groups of my Ummah that when they are pious, my Ummah will be upright, and when they are immoral, my Ummah will be corrupt." The Messenger of Allah − was asked who they were, and he answered: "The religious scholars and rulers."1 It is one of Allah’s countless bounties that there has never been a time that mankind has been without guidance. This guidance has appeared in many forms, including Prophets, Imams, and in their absence, the Ulemas and Marajas. ‘Ulema’ are defined as being Muslim scholars trained in Islam and Islamic law; in this day and age of the Ghayba (occultation) of the 12th Imam, Imam Mahdi Β, they are the main source of external guidance that people turn to for answers to questions, doubts, and simply as overall role- models. The Holy City of Qom, Iran, has been the epicentre of Islamic knowledge due to the presence and blessings of Bibi Ma’sooma ϑ, the sister of the 8th Imam, Imam Radha Β) Ulema of all backgrounds and all levels have been drawn to Bibi and this city, both benefiting from and contributing to the fountain of Islamic knowledge that flows here in the Hawzas (Islamic Seminaries) of Qom. A large number of prominent Ulema who migrated to Qom lived the remainder of their lives here, and are now buried in this Holy city; some in the blessed haram of Bibi Ma’sooma 1 Bihar-ul-Anwar, Vol 2, Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política Y Valores. Http
    1 Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. http://www.dilemascontemporaneoseducacionpoliticayvalores.com/ Año: VI Número: Edición Especial Artículo no.:63 Período: Agosto, 2019. TÍTULO: Ijtihad y el gobierno desde el punto de vista Chiíta. AUTORES: 1. Ph.D. Bahador Mehraki. 2. Ph.D. Abdolrasool Azimiyan. RESUMEN: Desde la perspectiva de los eruditos chiítas, ¿quién es responsable del liderazgo y el gobierno de los musulmanes durante la Ocultación? ¿Cuál es el alcance de sus deberes y poderes? Estas fueron las principales preguntas del estudio. Los hallazgos determinan tres puntos de vista dominantes: primero, el gobierno es solo el derecho del imán infalible, y nadie más tiene el derecho de estar en esta posición; segundo, la monarquía del rey es reconocida y el papel de los juristas se limita únicamente a ocupar los cargos religiosos y judiciales; tercero, la gobernanza y la administración de los asuntos sociales y políticos de los musulmanes se consideran deberes de los juristas justos y deben formar un gobierno. Este estudio descriptivo-analítico indicó que el establecimiento de un gobierno en la sociedad islámica es necesario para la institucionalización y la realización de la jurisprudencia científica en la práctica. PALABRAS CLAVES: Shiíta, Ijtihad, Jurisprudencia, Gobierno Constitucional. TITLE: Ijtihad and Government from the Shia Viewpoint. 2 AUTHORS: 1. Ph.D. Bahador Mehraki. 2. Ph.D. Abdolrasool Azimiyan. ABSTRACT: From Shiite scholars’ perspective, who is responsible for leadership and rule of Muslims
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT of Shrism in CONTEMPORARY IRAN
    DEVELOPMENT OF SHriSM IN CONTEMPORARY IRAN il.BSTRACTS THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy (Isla.mic Studies) BY Ahsanul Haq UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF ^^\^ CENTRE OF WEST ASIAN STUDIES ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH 1988 DEVELOPMENT OF SHI1SM IN CONTEMPORARY IRAN ABSTRACTS THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy (Isl£imic Studies) BY Ahsanul Haq UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF CENTRE OF WEST ASIAN STUDIES ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH 1988 ABSTRACT The oppositional attitude of the Shi'i 'ulania' towards the Pahlavi regime increased tremendously during the reign of Mohammad Reza Shah (1941-79). This opposition, obviously, had certain theoretical bases. Though the power and authority of 'ulama' vis-a-vis the existing government began to increase right from the Safavi period, an attempt to make a direct bid for power is certainly a recent phenomenon. Although there are quite a few general works available on the changing roles of the Iranian 'ulama', there is no serious study of the theoretical changes that took place in the thoughts of Shi'i 'ulama' during the reign of Mohammad Reza Shah. This dissertation tries to fulfil this gap. The dissertation is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter deals with the origins of Shi'i theory of imamate. Most of the basic concepts of Ithna 'Ashari Shi'ism (the Twelvers) such as imaroat ghayabat, intezar and taqiyya were crystallised during the Buyid and Mongol periods. According to Ithna 'Ashari Shi'i belief only the Prophet and imams possess legitimate authority -2- to rule over the people. They enjoyed spiritual as well as temporal velayat' over the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics in Modern and Contemporary Iran
    Politics in Modern and Contemporary Iran POL 443Y1 (Y) Tuesday 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. Prof. Ramin Jahanbegloo Office: Centre for Ethics, Gerard Larkin Building, room 207 Office Hours: Wednesdays- Fridays, 2-4 p.m. Telephone: (416) 9786362 E-mail: ramin.jahanbegloo@utoronto.ca COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course will provide students with an opportunity to explore politics in modern and contemporary Iran, as well as to address open questions in the relationship between the state and civil society, causes of regime change during the Pahlavi era and the rise of Islamic theocracy in Iran. The course has three interrelated goals: 1) making students familiar with the basic aspects of modern Iranian history, 2) providing them with analytical tools and knowledge for an in- depth understanding of the contemporary politics in Iran, and 3) generating theoretical insight into the question of how modern politics have been perceived and practiced in Iran from the late nineteenth century to the present. Students will learn about Iran’s encounter with modernity, Iranian intellectual trends, the causes and consequences of the 1979 revolution, and the nature of the post-revolutionary political system. Course Requirements: Students are expected to attend all class meetings. They will be held responsible for all the material covered in readings and lectures. To ensure class participation and to spread out the work a bit, each student is required to make one oral presentation in class concerning one of the topics listed in the syllabus in which they are interested. Preparation, attendance and participation: In addition to the lectures, we will devote time in class to a discussion of the reading materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fatwa Religion and Politics in Iran’S Proliferation Strategy
    Nuclear Fatwa Religion and Politics in Iran’s Proliferation Strategy Michael Eisenstadt and Mehdi Khalaji Policy Focus #115 | September 2011 Nuclear Fatwa Religion and Politics in Iran’s Proliferation Strategy Michael Eisenstadt and Mehdi Khalaji Policy Focus #115 | September 2011 All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2011 by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy Published in 2011 in the United States of America by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20036. Design by Daniel Kohan, Sensical Design and Communication Front cover: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivering a speech on November 8, 2006, where he stated that his country would continue to acquire nuclear technology and challenge “Western fabrications.” (AP Photo/ISNA, Morteza Farajabadi) Contents About the Authors. v Preface. vii Executive Sumary . ix 1. Religious Ideologies, Political Doctrines, and Nuclear Decisionmaking . 1 Michael Eisenstadt 2. Shiite Jurisprudence, Political Expediency, and Nuclear Weapons. 13 Mehdi Khalaji About the Authors Michael Eisenstadt is director of the Military and Security Studies Program at The Washington Institute. A spe- cialist in Persian Gulf and Arab-Israeli security affairs, he has published widely
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Revolutionary Iran's Foreign Policy Toward the United
    POST-REVOLUTIONARY IRAN’S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD THE UNITED STATES: A HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF STATE TRANSFORMATION AND FOREIGN POLICY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY GÜLRİZ ŞEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SEPTEMBER 2013 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences ________________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________ Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Faruk Yalvaç (METU, IR) _________________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık (METU, IR) _________________________ Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur (METU, HIST) _________________________ Prof. Dr. Elisabeth Özdalga (BİLKENT, POLS) _________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Özlem Tür (METU, IR) _________________________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Gülriz Şen Signature: iii ABSTRACT POST-REVOLUTIONARY IRAN’S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD THE UNITED STATES: A HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF STATE TRANSFORMATION AND FOREIGN POLICY Şen, Gülriz Ph.D., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Extent and Scope of Absolute Guardianship Of
    Journal of Politics and Law; Vol. 9, No. 5; 2016 ISSN 1913-9047 E-ISSN 1913-9055 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education A Comparative Study of the Extent and Scope of Absolute Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist, (Vilayat-e Faqih) from the Perspective of Shiite Jurists; and the Rashidun Caliphate in the View of Sunni Scholars Seyed Mohammad Reza Ayati1 & Mahdi Moghaddasi1 1 Jurisprudence and principles of Islamic Law, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Correspondence: Mahdi Moghaddasi, Jurisprudence and Principles of Islamic Law, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: moghaddasi.mahdi7718@gmail.com Received: May 28, 2016 Accepted: June 17, 2016 Online Published: June 29, 2016 doi:10.5539/jpl.v9n5p247 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v9n5p247 Abstract “Vilayat” literally means manager and governor as well as master. Absolute means complete power and authority. From the perspective of the Shia, this authority is in fact dedicated to God, and God has been assigned it to prophets and their successors, and in the time of occultation of Imam Mahdi (AS) to Wali faqih (the guardian jurist leading Islamic community). Just jurist has all the powers and authorities (including political) assigned to the Prophet (PBUH & HP) and the Imams (AS) for governance. In contrast, the Sunnis believe that religious texts are silent about the matter of government after the prophet (PBUH&HP), and they did not speak clearly about the system of government and the conditions of Islamic leader and the ways of selecting him. Hence, they followed a choice theory in determining the political system of Muslims after the death of the holy Prophet (PBUH&HP), and accepted caliphate system for ruling the Muslim community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Revolution at 30
    Viewpoints Special Edition The Iranian Revolution at 30 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org Cover photos, clockwise from the top left hand corner: Shahram Sharif photo; sajed.ir photo; sajed.ir photo; ? redo photo; sajed. ir photo; Maryam Ashoori photo; Zongo69 photo; UN photo; and [ john ] photo. 2 The Middle East Institute Viewpoints: The Iranian Revolution at 30 • www.mideasti.org Viewpoints Special Edition The Iranian Revolution at 30 The Middle East Institute Viewpoints: The Iranian Revolution at 30 • www.mideasti.org 3 Viewpoints: 1979 The year 1979 was among the most tumultuous, and important, in the history of the modern Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, August 6, 2014 Thursday, August 7, 2014
    10TH ISIS BIENNIAL CONFERENCE Montreal, August 6th-9th, 2014 GENERAL PROGRAM SCHEDULE: WEB DRAFT (13-06-2014) This draft-schedule comprises all events currently envisaged for the 10th Biennial ISIS Conference to be held in Montreal from August 6th to August 9th incl. We ask the conference participants to check the accuracy of their names, affiliations, and paper titles, and to let us know whether any corrections are in order. Please direct editorial requests to the Program Chair Marta Simidchieva at 2014program@iranianstudies.com. The sessions below are of five kinds: PRE-ORGANIZED PANELS and ROUND-TABLE DISCUSSIONS whose initiators and convenors are duly credited; INDEPENDENT PANELS created by the Conference Program Team from individually-submitted proposals; SPONSORED PANELS, organized and supported by an institution; CULTURAL EVENTS, RECEPTIONS, MEETINGS, and other activities, held alongside the academic program. Unless otherwise indicated, all academic sessions and other events are held at the Hilton Montreal Bonaventure. Please note, that this is not yet the final draft of the program: The Organizers reserve the right to consolidate panels with fewer than the required number of participants (minimum three), or to introduce other necessary changes to the program. WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 6, 2014 REGISTRATION: 2:00 PM—8:00 PM 7:00 PM : ISIS BOARD MEETING (Frontenac) THURSDAY, AUGUST 7, 2014 REGISTRATION: 9:00 am – 6:00 pm BOOK EXHIBIT: 9:00 am – 6:00 pm (Fontaine G + H) 9:00 am—10:30 am St Pierre 1 RATIONALISM IN SHI’I PHILOSOPHY AND JURISPRUDENCE [R11m] DISCUSSANT: Hossein Kamaly, Columbia University 1. Sussan Siavoshi, Trinity University, San Antonio.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam, Democracy and . the Crisis of Legitimacy
    CoV'vteV'vts Introduction by Tugrul Keskin and Najın al-Din Youseti Reflections on Democracy, Non-Violence and Political Change in han by N ader Hashem i -Page 3 An Interview with hanian Political Scientist Hossein Bashiriyeh by Danny Pastel -Page 6 The role of religious agents in modern Iran by Wladiıllir van Wilgenburg- Page 24 Identity Narratives among Second-Generatian Iranians ın the United States by Sahar Sadeghi - Page 28 Writers' Inferno, Ivay laDatseva-Page 32 h·an-Yemen Relations and Regional Implications by Ladan Yazdian- Page 39 Reconstructions, Reform and Ahınadinejad: h·an 's Political Revolutions 1989-2009 by Marcus W. Darsen-Page 44 Photojournalist: S asan Afsoosi - safsoosj@gmail.com Thirty Years after the Iranian Revolution: goveınment, but the controversy was little more than Islam, Democracy and . the Crisis of eplıemeral and posed no serious challenge to the Legitimacy governınent's autlıority . However, the latest allegations and the ensuing protests in Telıran and The 2009 presidential election in h·an marks an epoch other ınajor cities struck an unprecedented blow to not only in Iranian history but in the Middle East as the legitiınacy of the entire political system, which whole. For the fırst time after the 1979 revolution, the has over the past three decades relied on people's three defeated candidates with extensive votes to meet the exigencies of a republic. revolutionary credentials openly challenged the validity of the election, accusing the government of While the protests started with a siınple slogan massive fraud that had resulted in the reelection of - "where is my vote?"-they ostensibly targeted the incurnbent president Mahmud Ahmadinejad.
    [Show full text]
  • He Practice of Shi'i Jurisprudence in Contemporary Lebanon by Jean
    Te Practice of Shi‘i Jurisprudence in Contemporary Lebanon by Jean-Michel Landry A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Teory in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Saba Mahmood, Chair Professor Wendy L. Brown Professor Charles K. Hirschkind Professor Hussein Ali Agrama Fall 2016 Te Practice of Shi‘i Jurisprudence in Contemporary Lebanon Copyright 2016 by Jean-Michel Landry Abstract Te Practice of Shi‘i Jurisprudence in Contemporary Lebanon by Jean-Michel Landry Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Teory University of California, Berkeley Professor Saba Mahmood, Chair Drawing on ethnographic and archival research conducted in Lebanon and France between 2012 and 2014, this dissertation discusses Shi‘i methods of legal reasoning (ijtihad), and considers their incorporation into state juridical apparatuses. Since its colonial inception in 1926, the Lebanese state has harnessed the shari‘a tradition to regulate the family life of its Shi‘i citizenry. In order to properly grasp the ethical and epistemological transformations underlying the state’s appropriation of Shi‘i legal discourse, I suggest we frst examine the training judges, clerics, and jurists receive in traditional hawza seminaries. Tis dissertation’s frst three chapters show that learning to perform authoritative shari‘a reasoning requires not only developing a mastery of the sacred texts, but also submitting oneself to the discipline of the Shi‘i moral tradition. Te remaining chapters examine what Islamic legal reasoning becomes when it gets entangled with the judicial functions of a modern nation-state.
    [Show full text]