DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 63/Friday, April 1, 2011/Rules And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 63/Friday, April 1, 2011/Rules And Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 18087 (d) Performance standard for seat deterioration exceptions to all ADDRESSES: Comments and materials automated inspection measurement persons designated as fully qualified received, as well as supporting system. The automated inspection under § 213.7 and whose territories are documentation used in the preparation measurement system must be capable of subject to the requirements of § 213.234. of this final rule, are available for public measuring and processing rail seat At a minimum, the training shall inspection, by appointment, during deterioration requirements that specify address the following: normal business hours at the Panama the following: (1) Interpretation and handling of the City Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife (1) An accuracy, to within 1⁄8 of an exception reports generated by the Service, 1601 Balboa Avenue, Panama inch; automated inspection measurement City, FL 32405. (2) A distance-based sampling system; You may obtain copies of this final interval, which shall not exceed five (2) Locating and verifying exceptions rule from the address above, by calling feet; and in the field and required remedial 850/769–0552, or at the Federal (3) Calibration procedures and action; and eRulemaking Portal: http:// parameters assigned to the system, (3) Recordkeeping requirements. www.regulations.gov. which assure that measured and Issued in Washington, DC, on March 24, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don recorded values accurately represent rail 2011. Imm, Field Supervisor, at the Panama seat deterioration. City Field Office (see ADDRESSES) (e) Exception reports to be produced Joseph C. Szabo, (telephone 850/769–0552; facsimile by system; duty to field-verify Administrator. 850/763–2177). Individuals who are exceptions. The automated inspection [FR Doc. 2011–7666 Filed 3–31–11; 8:45 am] hearing-impaired or speech-impaired measurement system shall produce an BILLING CODE 4910–06–P may call the Federal Information Relay exception report containing a systematic Service at 800/877–8339 for TTY listing of all exceptions to assistance 24 hours a day, 7 days a § 213.109(d)(4), identified so that an DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR week. appropriate person(s) designated as fully qualified under § 213.7 can field- Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: verify each exception. Previous Federal Actions (1) Each exception must be located 50 CFR Part 17 and field-verified no later than 48 hours We proposed listing the Okaloosa [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2008–0071; darter as endangered on January 15, after the automated inspection. 92220–1113–0000–C6] (2) All field-verified exceptions are 1973 (38 FR 1521) and listed the species subject to all the requirements of this RIN 1018—AW95 as endangered under the Act (16 U.S.C. part. 1531 et seq.) on June 4, 1973 (38 FR (f) Recordkeeping requirements. The Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 14678) due to its extremely limited track owner shall maintain and make and Plants; Reclassification of the range, habitat degradation, and apparent available to FRA a record of the Okaloosa Darter From Endangered to competition from a possibly introduced inspection data and the exception Threatened and Special Rule related species, the brown darter. We record for the track inspected in completed a recovery plan for the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, accordance with this paragraph for a species on October 23, 1981, and a Interior. minimum of two years. The exception revised recovery plan on October 26, reports must include the following: ACTION: Final rule. 1998. (1) Date and location of limits of the On June 21, 2005, we provided notice SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and inspection; in the Federal Register that we were Wildlife Service (Service), are (2) Type and location of each initiating a 5-year status review under reclassifying the Okaloosa darter exception; the Act for the Okaloosa darter (70 FR (3) Results of field verification; and (Etheostoma okaloosae) from 35689).The 5-year status review was (4) Remedial action if required. endangered to threatened under the completed in July 2007, and is available (g) Procedures for integrity of data. authority of the Endangered Species Act on our Web site at http://www.fws.gov/ The track owner shall institute the of 1973, as amended (Act). The southeast/5yearReviews/5yearreviews/ necessary procedures for maintaining endangered designation no longer okaloosa_darterfinal.pdf. the integrity of the data collected by the correctly reflects the current status of On February 2, 2010, we published a measurement system. At a minimum, this fish due to a substantial proposed rule to reclassify the Okaloosa the track owner shall do the following: improvement in the species’ status. This darter from endangered to threatened (1) Maintain and make available to action is based on a thorough review of and a proposed special rule under FRA documented calibration procedures the best available scientific and section 4(d) of the Act (75 FR 5263). We of the measurement system that, at a commercial data, which indicate a requested that all interested parties minimum, specify an instrument substantial reduction in threats to the submit comments and information verification procedure that ensures species, a significant habitat restoration concerning the proposed reclassification correlation between measurements in most of the species’ range, and a of the Okaloosa darter. We provided made on the ground and those recorded stable or increasing trend of darters in notification of the publication of the by the instrumentation; and all darter stream systems. We also proposed rule through e-mail, facsimile, (2) Maintain each instrument used for establish a special rule under section telephone calls, letters, and news determining compliance with this 4(d) of the Act. This special rule allows releases sent to the appropriate Federal, section such that it accurately measures Eglin Air Force Base to continue State, and local agencies; county the depth of rail seat deterioration in activities with a reduced regulatory governments; elected officials; media accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this burden and will provide a net benefit to outlets; local jurisdictions; scientific section. the Okaloosa darter. organizations; interest groups; and other (h) Training. The track owner shall DATES: This final rule is effective May 2, interested parties. We also posted the provide annual training in handling rail 2011. proposed rule on the Service’s Panama VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:52 Mar 31, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM 01APR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 18088 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations City Field Office Internet Web site (pondweed), Eleocharis sp. (spikerush), the species be removed from the list; following the rule’s publication. We and other aquatic and emergent plants. and accepted public comments on the Okaloosa darters typically inhabit the (3) Estimates of the time required and proposed rule for 60 days, ending April margins of moderate- to fast-flowing cost to carry out the plan. 5, 2010. streams where detritus, root mats, and However, revisions to the list (adding, removing, or reclassifying a species) Background vegetation are present. Historic densities averaged about two darters per meter must reflect determinations made in The Okaloosa darter, Etheostoma (3.28 feet) of stream length while more accordance with sections 4(a)(1) and okaloosae, is a member of the family recent abundance estimates show an 4(b) of the Act. Section 4(a)(1) requires Percidae. It is a small, perch-like fish increase to an average of 2.9 darters per that the Secretary determine whether a (maximum size is 49 millimeters (mm) meter (Jordan and Jelks 2004, p. 3; species is endangered or threatened (or (1.93 inches (in.)) Standard Length) that USAF 2006, p. 3–1). They are only not) because of one or more of five is characterized by a well-developed rarely collected in areas where there is threat factors. Therefore, recovery humeral spot, a series of five to eight no current or in open sandy areas in the criteria must indicate when a species is rows of small spots along the sides of middle of the stream channel. The no longer endangered or threatened by the body, and the first anal spine being creeks with Okaloosa darters are any of the five factors. In other words, longer than the second. General body generally shaded over most of their objective, measurable criteria, or coloration varies from red-brown to courses, with temperatures ranging from recovery criteria contained in recovery green-yellow dorsally, and lighter 7 to 22 degrees Celsius (°C) (44 to 72 plans, must indicate when we would ventrally, although breeding males have degrees Fahrenheit (°F)) in the winter anticipate an analysis of the five threat a bright orange submarginal stripe on (Tate 2008, pers. comm.; Jelks 2010, factors under 4(a)(1) would result in a the first dorsal fin (Burkhead et al. 1992, pers. comm.) to 22 to 29 °C (72 to 84 °F) determination that a species is no longer p. 23). in the summer (Mettee and Crittenden endangered or threatened. Section 4(b) The endemic Okaloosa darter is 1977, p. 5; Jelks 2010, pers. comm). of the Act requires the determination known to occur in only six clear stream made be ‘‘solely on the basis of the best Okaloosa darters feed primarily on fly systems that drain into two scientific and commercial data larvae (Diptera sp.), mayfly nymphs Choctawhatchee Bay bayous in Walton available.’’ and Okaloosa Counties in northwest (Ephemeroptera sp.), and caddis fly Thus, while recovery plans are Florida. Okaloosa darters are currently (Trichoptera sp.) larvae (Ogilvie 1980, intended to provide guidance to the found in the tributaries and the main as referenced in Burkhead et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis
    Putnam County COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSERVATION ELEMENT EAR-based Amendments Putnam County 2509 Crill Avenue, Suite 300 Palatka, FL 32178 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis Putnam County Conservation Element Table of Contents Section Page I. Introduction 4 II. Inventory of Natural Resources 5 A. Surface Water Resources 5 1. Lakes and Prairies 5 2. Rivers and Creeks 8 3. Water Quality 10 4. Surface Water Improvement and Management Act (SWIM) 15 5. Analysis of Surface Water Resources 16 B. Groundwater Resources 17 1. Aquifers 17 2. Recharge Areas 18 3. Cones of Influence 18 4. Contaminated Well Sites 18 5. Alternate Sources of Water Supply 19 6. Water Needs and Sources 21 7. Analysis of Groundwater Resources 22 C. Wetlands 23 1. General Description of Wetlands 23 2. Impacts to Wetlands 25 3. Analysis of Wetlands 26 D. Floodplains 26 1. National Flood Insurance Program 26 2. Drainage Basins 26 3. Flooding 29 4. Analysis of Floodplains 30 E. Fisheries, Wildlife, Marine Habitats, and Vegetative Communities 30 1. Fisheries 30 2. Vegetative Communities 30 3. Environmentally Sensitive Lands 35 4. Wildlife Species 55 5. Marine Habitat 57 6. Analysis of Environmentally Sensitive Lands 58 F. Air Resources 58 1. Particulate Matter (PM) 58 2. Sulfur Dioxide 59 3. Nitrogen Oxides 60 4. Total Reduced Sulfur Compounds 60 5. Other Pollutants 61 6. Analysis of Air Resources 61 EAR-based Amendments 10/26/10 E-1 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis G. Areas Known to Experience Soil Erosion 62 1. Potential for Erosion 62 2. Analysis of Soil Erosion 64 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Calibration of The
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist ECOSYSTEMS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM CALIBRATION OF THE INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR THE SOUTHERN PLAINS ICHTHYOREGION IN ALABAMA OPEN-FILE REPORT 1210 by Patrick E. O'Neil and Thomas E. Shepard Prepared in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introduction.......................................................... 2 Acknowledgments .................................................... 6 Objectives........................................................... 7 Study area .......................................................... 7 Southern Plains ichthyoregion ...................................... 7 Methods ............................................................ 9 IBI sample collection ............................................. 9 Habitat measures............................................... 11 Habitat metrics ........................................... 12 The human disturbance gradient ................................... 16 IBI metrics and scoring criteria..................................... 20 Designation of guilds....................................... 21 Results and discussion................................................ 23 Sampling sites and collection results . 23 Selection and scoring of Southern Plains IBI metrics . 48 Metrics selected for the
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Study Cover 3
    Putnam County Environmental Council ! !"#"$%&%#'("#)(*%+',-"'.,#(,/( '0%(1.+0(2,345"'.,#+(,/(6.57%-( 63-.#$+("#)('0%(!.))5%("#)(8,9%-( :;<5"9"0"(*.7%-=(15,-.)"=(>6?( ( *,@(*A(8%9.+(BBB=(!A?A=(2ACA6A( MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION OF THE FISH POPULATIONS OF SILVER SPRINGS AND THE MIDDLE AND LOWER OCKLAWAHA RIVER, FLORIDA, USA A Special Report for The Putnam County Environmental Council Funded by a Grant from the Felburn Foundation By Roy R. “Robin” Lewis III, M.A., P.W.S. Certified Professional Wetland Scientist and Certified Senior Ecologist May 14, 2012 Cover photograph: Longnose Gar, Lepisosteus osseus, in Silver Springs, Underwater Photograph by Peter Butt, KARST Environmental ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank all those who reviewed and commented on the numerous drafts of this document, including Paul Nosca, Michael Woodward, Curtis Kruer and Sandy Kokernoot. All conclusions, however, remain the responsibility of the author. CITATION The suggested citation for this report is: LEWIS, RR. 2012. MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION OF THE FISH POPULATIONS OF SILVER SPRINGS AND THE MIDDLE AND LOWER OCKLAWAHA RIVER, FLORIDA, USA. Putnam County Environmental Council, Interlachen, Florida. 27 p + append. Additional copies of this document can be downloaded from the PCEC website at www.pcecweb.org. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sixty‐nine (69) species of native fish have been documented to have utilized Silver Springs, Silver River and the Upper, Middle and Lower Ocklawaha River for the period of record. Fifty‐nine of these are freshwater fish species and ten are native migratory species using marine, estuarine and freshwater habitats during their life history. These include striped bass, American eel, American shad, hickory shad, hogchoker, striped mullet, channel and white catfish, needlefish and southern flounder.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014 2013‐2014 National Rivers & Streams Assessment Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.3, May 2014 Page ii of 224 NOTICE The intention of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 is to provide a comprehensive “State of Flowing Waters” assessment for rivers and streams across the United States. The complete documentation of overall project management, design, methods, quality assurance, and standards is contained in five companion documents: National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Quality Assurance Project Plan EPA‐841‐B‐12‐007 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Site Evaluation Guidelines EPA‐841‐B‐12‐008 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐ 12‐009a National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐12‐ 009b National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Laboratory Operations Manual EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 Addendum to the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable & Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manuals This document (Laboratory Operations Manual) contains information on the methods for analyses of the samples to be collected during the project, quality assurance objectives, sample handling, and data reporting. These methods are based on the guidelines developed and followed in the Western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (Peck et al. 2003). Methods described in this document are to be used specifically in work relating to the NRSA 2013‐2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 12.A. Fishes of the St. Johns River System
    Appendix 12.A Appendix 12.A. Fishes of the St. Johns River System Sources: (McLane 1955; Tagatz 1968; Cox et al. 1980; MacDonald et al. 2009) Habitat:: A = Anadromous, M =Marine, E = Estuarine, F = Freshwater. Feeding and reproductive guilds are presented only for the 47 species used in the fresh water analysis. Feeding guilds follow Goldstein and Simon(1998) : C= Carnivore, D= Detritivore, H= Herbivore, I= Invertivore, O= Omnivore, P= Planktivore Reproductive guilds follow Simon (1998): A.1.2= Lithopelagophil, A.1.4= Non nest builder phytolithophil, A.1.5= Non nest builder phytophil, B.2.2= Polyphil, B.2.5= Nest building phytophil,, B.2.7= Speleophil, C.2.4= Viviparous, Family Reported Incl. in Incl. in Scientific Name Common Name Habitat in Middle Freshwater Estuary Feeding Reproductive Exotic Basin Analysis Analysis Guild Guild Petromyzontidae Petromyzon marinus Sea Lamprey A,M,E Sphyraenidae Sphyrna lewini Scalloped M hammerhead Dasyatidae Dasyatis americana Southern stingray M, E Dasyatis sabina Atlantic stingray M, E, F Dasyatis say Bluntnose stingray M,E Myliobatidae Aetobatus narinari Spotted eagle ray M,E Gymnuridae Gymnura micrura Smooth butterfly ray M,E Rhinoptera bonasus Cownose ray M,E Ascipenseridae Ascipenser brevirostrum Shortnose sturgeon A,M,E Ascipenser oxyrhynchus Atlantic sturgeon A,M,E Lepisosteidae Lepisosteus osseus Longnose gar F √ √ √ C A.1.4 Lepisosteus platyrhinchus Florida gar F √ √ C A.1.5 Phycidae Urophycis regia Spotted hake M,E Urophycis floridana Southern hake M,E Amiidae Amia calva Bowfin F √ √ I,C
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita
    Stephen A. Bortone Stephen A. Bortone, Ph.D. Osprey Aquatic Sciences, LLC 47 West Shore Rd. Windham, New Hampshire Mobile: 813.390.1667 FAX: 603.458.1318 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. (Marine Sciences), University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill; December 1973 M.S. (Biology), Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida; August 1970 B.S. (Biology), Albright College, Reading, Pennsylvania; August 1968 Lexington Senior High School, Lexington, Massachusetts 1964 PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 2015 – present, Owner and Environmental Consultant, Osprey Aquatic Sciences, LLC. Windham, New Hampshire. 2013 – 2015, President and Environmental Consultant, Osprey Aquatic Sciences, Inc., Tampa, Florida. 2013 – present, Marine Biology Series Editor, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2009 – 2013 retired, Executive Director, Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, Tampa, Florida. 2009 – present, Courtesy Professor appointment to the College of Marine Science, University of South Florida. 2009, Program host for KUMD (103.3 FM) radio – The Sea Grant Files. 2008 – present, Editorial Advisory Board of Biologia Marina Mediterranea (Journal of the Italian Society of Marine Biology). 2006 – 2009, Director of the Minnesota Sea Grant College Program and Professor of Biology, University of Minnesota, Duluth. 1 2005, Adjunct Graduate Faculty, Florida Gulf Coast University 2002 – 2006, Director of the Sanibel-Captiva Marine Laboratory, Sanibel, Florida. 1999 – 2002, Director of Environmental Science, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Naples,
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida Gregg R
    Gulf of Mexico Science Volume 22 Article 1 Number 2 Number 2 2004 Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida Gregg R. Poulakis Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Richard E. Matheson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Michael E. Mitchell Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission David A. Blewett Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Charles F. Idelberger Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission DOI: 10.18785/goms.2202.01 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Poulakis, G. R., R. E. Matheson Jr., M. E. Mitchell, D. A. Blewett nda C. F. Idelberger. 2004. Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida. Gulf of Mexico Science 22 (2). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol22/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Poulakis et al.: Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida Gulf of Mexico Science, 2004(2), pp. 117-150 Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida GREGG R. POULAIUS, RICHARD E. MATHESON JR., MICHAEL E. MITCHELL, DAVID A. BLEWETT, AND CHARLES F. lDELBERGER To date, 255 fish species in 95 families have been reliably reported from the Charlotte Harbor estuarine system in southwest Florida. The species list was com­ piled from recent fishery-independent collections, a review of reports and peer­ reviewed literature, and examination of cataloged specimens at the Florida Mu­ seum of Natural History.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 30 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown G Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) S Rank: S1 — Critically imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Boston Mountains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Ouachita Mountains Element Occurrence Records Taxa Association Team and Reviewers AGFC Mr. Steve Filipek, SAU Dr. Henry Robinson, UA/Ft. Smith Dr. Tom Buchanan, AGFC Mr. Jeff Quinn, AGFC Mr. Brian Wagner Acipenser fulvescens Page 411 Lake Sturgeon Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins where the species occurs Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Ouachita Mountains - Ouachita River South Central Plains - Ouachita River South Central Plains - Red River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Conduct literature review and/or life history study. Conduct status survey. Acipenser fulvescens Page 412 Lake
    [Show full text]
  • NRSA 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Appendices (Pdf)
    National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Appendix A: Equipment & Supplies Appendix Equipment A: & Supplies A-1 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 pendix Equipment A: & Supplies Ap A-2 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Base Kit: A Base Kit will be provided to the field crews for all sampling sites that they will go to. Some items are sent in the base kit as extra supplies to be used as needed. Item Quantity Protocol Antibiotic Salve 1 Fish plug Centrifuge tube stand 1 Chlorophyll A Centrifuge tubes (screw-top, 50-mL) (extras) 5 Chlorophyll A Periphyton Clinometer 1 Physical Habitat CST Berger SAL 20 Automatic Level 1 Physical Habitat Delimiter – 12 cm2 area 1 Periphyton Densiometer - Convex spherical (modified with taped V) 1 Physical Habitat D-frame Kick Net (500 µm mesh, 52” handle) 1 Benthics Filteration flask (with silicone stopped and adapter) 1 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Fish weigh scale(s) 1 Fish plug Fish Voucher supplies 1 pack Fish Voucher Foil squares (aluminum, 3x6”) 1 pack Chlorophyll A Periphyton Gloves (nitrile) 1 box General Graduated cylinder (25 mL) 1 Periphyton Graduated cylinder (250 mL) 1 Chlorophyll A, Periphyton HDPE bottle (1 L, white, wide-mouth) (extras) 12 Benthics, Fish Vouchers HDPE bottle (500 mL, white, wide-mouth) with graduations 1 Periphyton Laboratory pipette bulb 1 Fish Plug Microcentrifuge tubes containing glass beads
    [Show full text]
  • Pteronotropis Welaka), with NOTES on the OCCURRENCE of the IRONCOLOR SHINER (Notropis Chalybaeus), in ALABAMA, 2007
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew State Geologist WATER INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM Patrick E. O’Neil Director STATUS SURVEY OF THE BLUENOSE SHINER (Pteronotropis welaka), WITH NOTES ON THE OCCURRENCE OF THE IRONCOLOR SHINER (Notropis chalybaeus), IN ALABAMA, 2007 OPEN-FILE REPORT 0712 By J. Brett Smith, Thomas E. Shepard, Patrick E. O’Neil, E. Anne Wynn, and Cal C. Johnson Prepared in cooperation with Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2008 CONTENTS Page Abstract..................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................... 5 Study area.................................................................................................................................. 5 Methods..................................................................................................................................... 6 Results and discussion .............................................................................................................. 6 Conclusions............................................................................................................................... 11 References cited.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Biota of Florida
    BURKHEAD , N.M., J.D. WILLIAMS, AND R.W. YERGER . 1 992. OKALOOSA DARTER. ETHEOSTOMA OKALOOSAE , PAGES 23-30. IN: C. R. GILBERT ( ED. , RARE AND ENDANGERED BIOTA OF FLORIDA. VOLUME II. FISHES . UNIVERSITY PRESS OF F 1 LORIDA , GAINESVILLE . Endangered Okaloosa Darter Etheostoma okaloosae FAMILY PERCIDAE Order Perciformes ■• , , 4- ..IMMINW."••• 1% 16 V X 4. moMONI.N■7•. .' •4 `1./. .4' 4:41 , 4 , - ' ,9/‘ /•11■I' /%141‘'•.= P al, A 4, " A{ Itc‘‘'%41 11. Okaloosa darter, Esheostoma okaloosae (Fowler, 1941). UP 74516. Adult female, 45.0 mm SL Long Creek (tributary to Rocky Bayou), Eglin Air Force Base, Okaloosa County, Florida. 17 January 1973. OTHER NAMES: None. DESCRIPTION: Etheostoma okaloosae is a darter of relatively small to mod- erate size (maximum 49 mm standard length [SL]), which is character- ized by the following features: a well-developed humeral blotch; body color in life red-brown to yellow-brown dorsally, lighter ventrally, the pigment broken up into small dots arranged in 5 to 8 rows along sides of body; midside of body with 9 to 10 dark dashes or blotches, which vary in degree of prominence; suborbital bar present but thin and not particu- larly prominent; cheeks and prepectoral area with well-developed spot- ting, but latter without a prominent bar; both sexes without red spots on body, but dorsal fin with a thin orange-red submarginal stripe; lateral line yen, slightly arched anteriorly (nearly straight), separated from origin of dorsal fin by 3 to 4 scale rows; lateral line complete or nearly complete, the total number of scales ranging from 32 to 37 (usually 34 to 36), with no more than 4 unpored scales; cheeks, opercle, belly, and nape fully scaled, the breast fully or partly scaled; premaxillary frenum present and 23 24 OKALOOSA DARTER well developed; branchiostegal membranes narrowly connected, the apex forming a broad "V" and located at a point below posterior part of cheek; dorsal-fin rays 10-13 (usually IX, 11-12); pectoral-fin rays, 12-14 (usually 13); anal-fin rays II, 6-8 (usually II, 7).
    [Show full text]