DOCSLIB.ORG

Okaloosa Darter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Okaloosa Darter Okaloosa darter Etheostoma okaloosae (Photo courtesy of Noel Burkhead, USGS) Taxonomic Classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Actinopterygii Order: Perciformes Family: Percidae Genus/Species: Etheostoma okalossae Common Name: Okaloosa darter Listing Status Federal Status: Threatened FL Status: Federally-designated Threatened FNAI Ranks: G1/S1 (Critically Imperiled) IUCN Status: EN (Endangered) Physical Description The Okaloosa darter is a small darter that reaches a body length of only two inches (5.1 centimeters). This darter species has a green-yellow to red-brown coloration with five to eight brown spots along the lateral surface of its body, and a well established spot above the base of its pectoral fin. Male Okaloosa darters develop an orange band along the edges of its first dorsal fin (Florida Natural Areas Inventory 2001). As an obligate bottom dweller, they have no swim bladder, which enables a fish to control its buoyancy. Okaloosa Darter 1 | Page Life History The diet of the Okaloosa darter primarily consists of mayfly nymphs, caddisfly larvae, and midge larvae (Ogilvie 1980). Okaloosa darters breed between the months of March and October, with most breeding activities occurring in April and a peak breeding period in October. In one Okaloosa darter study, a mean average of 79 ova (eggs), of which 29 were mature, were found among 201 females sampled. Eggs attach to vegetation once they are released. Female Okaloosa darters reach sexual maturity when a standard length of 1.2 inches (3.1 centimeters) is reached (Ogilvie 1980). Habitat & Distribution The Okaloosa darter inhabits small streams that are fed by ground water seepage from the surrounding sandhills (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1998). The majority of Okaloosa darter habitat is located within Eglin Air Force Base’s (Eglin AFB) boundaries, but they can also be found in adjoining portions of Okaloosa and Walton counties in Boggy and Rocky bayou of the Choctawhatchee Bay drainage (Burkhead and Williams 1992). Threats The main threat to the Okaloosa darter is the introduction of the brown darter (Etheostoma edwini) to its habitat. Brown darters are thought to out-compete the Okaloosa darter for food and other resources (Burkhead and Williams 1992). Sedimentation of streams is also a threat to the Okaloosa darter as the sediments can cover sites where eggs are laid. Other threats include an increase of pollutants in streams. With Eglin AFB committed to continued conservation of the Okaloosa darter, the secondary threats will occur primarily as a result of off-base development and land-use conversion. Conservation & Management The Okaloosa darter is protected as a Threatened species by the Federal Endangered Species Act and as a Federally-designated Threatened species by Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species Rule. Eglin AFB’s Jackson Guard Unit has made on-base conservation a priority. Eglin AFB has reclaimed clay pits near stream headwaters and improve road crossings to reduce sedimentation and improve habitat for the darter. -Federal Recovery Plan -Federal Action Plan Okaloosa Darter 2 | Page Other Informative Links Florida Natural Areas Inventory International Union for Conservation of Nature U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Okaloosa Darter Recovery Plan U.S. Geological Survey References Burkhead N.M. and Williams J.D.,1992. Okaloosa Darter Etheostoma okaloosae. Pages 23-30 in C.R. Gilbert, editor. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume II. Fishes. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Florida Natural Areas Inventory. 2001. Field guide to the rare animals of Florida. http://www.fnai.org/FieldGuide/pdf/Etheostoma_okaloosae.PDF Ogilvie, V.E. 1980. Unpublished Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission Endangered Wildlife Project E-1. Annual Progress Report. Tallahassee, Florida. 19 p. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Okaloosa Darter (Etheostoma okaloosae) Recovery Plan (Revised). Atlanta, Georgia. 42 pp. Okaloosa Darter 3 | Page .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis
    Putnam County COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSERVATION ELEMENT EAR-based Amendments Putnam County 2509 Crill Avenue, Suite 300 Palatka, FL 32178 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis Putnam County Conservation Element Table of Contents Section Page I. Introduction 4 II. Inventory of Natural Resources 5 A. Surface Water Resources 5 1. Lakes and Prairies 5 2. Rivers and Creeks 8 3. Water Quality 10 4. Surface Water Improvement and Management Act (SWIM) 15 5. Analysis of Surface Water Resources 16 B. Groundwater Resources 17 1. Aquifers 17 2. Recharge Areas 18 3. Cones of Influence 18 4. Contaminated Well Sites 18 5. Alternate Sources of Water Supply 19 6. Water Needs and Sources 21 7. Analysis of Groundwater Resources 22 C. Wetlands 23 1. General Description of Wetlands 23 2. Impacts to Wetlands 25 3. Analysis of Wetlands 26 D. Floodplains 26 1. National Flood Insurance Program 26 2. Drainage Basins 26 3. Flooding 29 4. Analysis of Floodplains 30 E. Fisheries, Wildlife, Marine Habitats, and Vegetative Communities 30 1. Fisheries 30 2. Vegetative Communities 30 3. Environmentally Sensitive Lands 35 4. Wildlife Species 55 5. Marine Habitat 57 6. Analysis of Environmentally Sensitive Lands 58 F. Air Resources 58 1. Particulate Matter (PM) 58 2. Sulfur Dioxide 59 3. Nitrogen Oxides 60 4. Total Reduced Sulfur Compounds 60 5. Other Pollutants 61 6. Analysis of Air Resources 61 EAR-based Amendments 10/26/10 E-1 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis G. Areas Known to Experience Soil Erosion 62 1. Potential for Erosion 62 2. Analysis of Soil Erosion 64 H.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Calibration of The
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist ECOSYSTEMS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM CALIBRATION OF THE INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR THE SOUTHERN PLAINS ICHTHYOREGION IN ALABAMA OPEN-FILE REPORT 1210 by Patrick E. O'Neil and Thomas E. Shepard Prepared in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introduction.......................................................... 2 Acknowledgments .................................................... 6 Objectives........................................................... 7 Study area .......................................................... 7 Southern Plains ichthyoregion ...................................... 7 Methods ............................................................ 9 IBI sample collection ............................................. 9 Habitat measures............................................... 11 Habitat metrics ........................................... 12 The human disturbance gradient ................................... 16 IBI metrics and scoring criteria..................................... 20 Designation of guilds....................................... 21 Results and discussion................................................ 23 Sampling sites and collection results . 23 Selection and scoring of Southern Plains IBI metrics . 48 Metrics selected for the
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 63/Friday, April 1, 2011/Rules And
    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 18087 (d) Performance standard for seat deterioration exceptions to all ADDRESSES: Comments and materials automated inspection measurement persons designated as fully qualified received, as well as supporting system. The automated inspection under § 213.7 and whose territories are documentation used in the preparation measurement system must be capable of subject to the requirements of § 213.234. of this final rule, are available for public measuring and processing rail seat At a minimum, the training shall inspection, by appointment, during deterioration requirements that specify address the following: normal business hours at the Panama the following: (1) Interpretation and handling of the City Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife (1) An accuracy, to within 1⁄8 of an exception reports generated by the Service, 1601 Balboa Avenue, Panama inch; automated inspection measurement City, FL 32405. (2) A distance-based sampling system; You may obtain copies of this final interval, which shall not exceed five (2) Locating and verifying exceptions rule from the address above, by calling feet; and in the field and required remedial 850/769–0552, or at the Federal (3) Calibration procedures and action; and eRulemaking Portal: http:// parameters assigned to the system, (3) Recordkeeping requirements. www.regulations.gov. which assure that measured and Issued in Washington, DC, on March 24, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don recorded values accurately represent rail 2011. Imm, Field Supervisor, at the Panama seat deterioration. City Field Office (see ADDRESSES) (e) Exception reports to be produced Joseph C. Szabo, (telephone 850/769–0552; facsimile by system; duty to field-verify Administrator.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Study Cover 3
    Putnam County Environmental Council ! !"#"$%&%#'("#)(*%+',-"'.,#(,/( '0%(1.+0(2,345"'.,#+(,/(6.57%-( 63-.#$+("#)('0%(!.))5%("#)(8,9%-( :;<5"9"0"(*.7%-=(15,-.)"=(>6?( ( *,@(*A(8%9.+(BBB=(!A?A=(2ACA6A( MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION OF THE FISH POPULATIONS OF SILVER SPRINGS AND THE MIDDLE AND LOWER OCKLAWAHA RIVER, FLORIDA, USA A Special Report for The Putnam County Environmental Council Funded by a Grant from the Felburn Foundation By Roy R. “Robin” Lewis III, M.A., P.W.S. Certified Professional Wetland Scientist and Certified Senior Ecologist May 14, 2012 Cover photograph: Longnose Gar, Lepisosteus osseus, in Silver Springs, Underwater Photograph by Peter Butt, KARST Environmental ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank all those who reviewed and commented on the numerous drafts of this document, including Paul Nosca, Michael Woodward, Curtis Kruer and Sandy Kokernoot. All conclusions, however, remain the responsibility of the author. CITATION The suggested citation for this report is: LEWIS, RR. 2012. MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION OF THE FISH POPULATIONS OF SILVER SPRINGS AND THE MIDDLE AND LOWER OCKLAWAHA RIVER, FLORIDA, USA. Putnam County Environmental Council, Interlachen, Florida. 27 p + append. Additional copies of this document can be downloaded from the PCEC website at www.pcecweb.org. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sixty‐nine (69) species of native fish have been documented to have utilized Silver Springs, Silver River and the Upper, Middle and Lower Ocklawaha River for the period of record. Fifty‐nine of these are freshwater fish species and ten are native migratory species using marine, estuarine and freshwater habitats during their life history. These include striped bass, American eel, American shad, hickory shad, hogchoker, striped mullet, channel and white catfish, needlefish and southern flounder.
    [Show full text]
  • Etheostoma Osburni) in West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2020 Utilizing conservation genetics as a strategy for recovering the endangered Candy Darter (Etheostoma osburni) in West Virginia Brin E. Kessinger West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kessinger, Brin E., "Utilizing conservation genetics as a strategy for recovering the endangered Candy Darter (Etheostoma osburni) in West Virginia" (2020). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7670. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7670 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Utilizing conservation genetics as a strategy for recovering the endangered Candy Darter (Etheostoma osburni) in West Virginia Brin Kessinger Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Resources Amy B.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014 2013‐2014 National Rivers & Streams Assessment Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.3, May 2014 Page ii of 224 NOTICE The intention of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 is to provide a comprehensive “State of Flowing Waters” assessment for rivers and streams across the United States. The complete documentation of overall project management, design, methods, quality assurance, and standards is contained in five companion documents: National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Quality Assurance Project Plan EPA‐841‐B‐12‐007 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Site Evaluation Guidelines EPA‐841‐B‐12‐008 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐ 12‐009a National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐12‐ 009b National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Laboratory Operations Manual EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 Addendum to the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable & Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manuals This document (Laboratory Operations Manual) contains information on the methods for analyses of the samples to be collected during the project, quality assurance objectives, sample handling, and data reporting. These methods are based on the guidelines developed and followed in the Western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (Peck et al. 2003). Methods described in this document are to be used specifically in work relating to the NRSA 2013‐2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Meeting
    Southeastern Fishes Council Annual Meeting Abstracts November 10 & 11, 2011 Chattanooga, Tennessee Abstracts are listed alphabetically by presenter in two different sections: Contributed Oral Presentations and Posters. RECOVERY OF A LOWLAND FISH ASSEMBLAGE FOLLOWING LARGE-SCALE ROTENONE APPLICATION IN EASTERN ARKANSAS Ginny Adams, Clint Johnson and S. Reid Adams University of Central Arkansas, Department of Biology In Spring 2009, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service attempted to eradicate northern snakehead, Channa argus, from the Big Piney watershed in eastern Arkansas by applying rotenone to approximately 640 km of streams. To examine long- term fish community recovery, we sampled at 17 sites in Spring 2009, Summer 2009, Spring 2010, and Summer 2010. Although species richness was unchanged (1-way ANOVA, F3,64=2.61, P=0.059) over time, many other community characteristics varied. Fish densities increased significantly after the eradication (1-way ANOVA, F3,64=16, P<0.0001) due to high abundances of YOY. Life history guild was found to significantly affect density (periodic species 1-way ANOVA, F3,64=7.20, P=0.0003; opportunistic 1-way ANOVA, F3,64=9.69, P<0.0001; Tukey HSD) with early recolonizing species possessing traits including mobile adults, high fecundity, and/or early ² reproduction. Trophic structure also changed significantly over time (χ 0.05, 4= 26032.76, P<<0.0001) with variability in proportions of omnivores and invertivores, though piscivores showed relatively little change. Piscivore composition, however, did vary significantly by sample ² (χ 0.05, 4= 1621.47, P<<0.0001) with an increase in small piscivores and a decrease in large- bodied piscivores.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 12.A. Fishes of the St. Johns River System
    Appendix 12.A Appendix 12.A. Fishes of the St. Johns River System Sources: (McLane 1955; Tagatz 1968; Cox et al. 1980; MacDonald et al. 2009) Habitat:: A = Anadromous, M =Marine, E = Estuarine, F = Freshwater. Feeding and reproductive guilds are presented only for the 47 species used in the fresh water analysis. Feeding guilds follow Goldstein and Simon(1998) : C= Carnivore, D= Detritivore, H= Herbivore, I= Invertivore, O= Omnivore, P= Planktivore Reproductive guilds follow Simon (1998): A.1.2= Lithopelagophil, A.1.4= Non nest builder phytolithophil, A.1.5= Non nest builder phytophil, B.2.2= Polyphil, B.2.5= Nest building phytophil,, B.2.7= Speleophil, C.2.4= Viviparous, Family Reported Incl. in Incl. in Scientific Name Common Name Habitat in Middle Freshwater Estuary Feeding Reproductive Exotic Basin Analysis Analysis Guild Guild Petromyzontidae Petromyzon marinus Sea Lamprey A,M,E Sphyraenidae Sphyrna lewini Scalloped M hammerhead Dasyatidae Dasyatis americana Southern stingray M, E Dasyatis sabina Atlantic stingray M, E, F Dasyatis say Bluntnose stingray M,E Myliobatidae Aetobatus narinari Spotted eagle ray M,E Gymnuridae Gymnura micrura Smooth butterfly ray M,E Rhinoptera bonasus Cownose ray M,E Ascipenseridae Ascipenser brevirostrum Shortnose sturgeon A,M,E Ascipenser oxyrhynchus Atlantic sturgeon A,M,E Lepisosteidae Lepisosteus osseus Longnose gar F √ √ √ C A.1.4 Lepisosteus platyrhinchus Florida gar F √ √ C A.1.5 Phycidae Urophycis regia Spotted hake M,E Urophycis floridana Southern hake M,E Amiidae Amia calva Bowfin F √ √ I,C
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita
    Stephen A. Bortone Stephen A. Bortone, Ph.D. Osprey Aquatic Sciences, LLC 47 West Shore Rd. Windham, New Hampshire Mobile: 813.390.1667 FAX: 603.458.1318 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. (Marine Sciences), University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill; December 1973 M.S. (Biology), Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida; August 1970 B.S. (Biology), Albright College, Reading, Pennsylvania; August 1968 Lexington Senior High School, Lexington, Massachusetts 1964 PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 2015 – present, Owner and Environmental Consultant, Osprey Aquatic Sciences, LLC. Windham, New Hampshire. 2013 – 2015, President and Environmental Consultant, Osprey Aquatic Sciences, Inc., Tampa, Florida. 2013 – present, Marine Biology Series Editor, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2009 – 2013 retired, Executive Director, Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, Tampa, Florida. 2009 – present, Courtesy Professor appointment to the College of Marine Science, University of South Florida. 2009, Program host for KUMD (103.3 FM) radio – The Sea Grant Files. 2008 – present, Editorial Advisory Board of Biologia Marina Mediterranea (Journal of the Italian Society of Marine Biology). 2006 – 2009, Director of the Minnesota Sea Grant College Program and Professor of Biology, University of Minnesota, Duluth. 1 2005, Adjunct Graduate Faculty, Florida Gulf Coast University 2002 – 2006, Director of the Sanibel-Captiva Marine Laboratory, Sanibel, Florida. 1999 – 2002, Director of Environmental Science, The Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Naples,
    [Show full text]