Palaeontological and Sedimentological Effects of Micro&

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Palaeontological and Sedimentological Effects of Micro& Palaeontological and sedimentological effects of micro-bioherms in the Middle Silurian Massie Formation of southeastern Indiana, USA JAMES R. THOMKA AND CARLTON E. BRETT Thomka J.R., Brett, C.E. 2015: Palaeontological and sedimentological effects of micro- bioherms in the Middle Silurian Massie Formation of southeastern Indiana, USA. Lethaia, Vol. 48, pp. 172–187. Small build-ups composed primarily of micrite and benthic skeletal remains, termed ‘micro-bioherms’, have been recognized within Silurian strata of eastern and midcon- tinental United States for well over 75 years; however, previous research has focused nearly entirely on such structures within the upper Wenlock (Homerian) Waldron Shale. An undolomitized section of the lower Wenlock (Sheinwoodian) Massie For- mation in Ripley County, southeastern Indiana, was studied to assess the influence of micro-bioherms on palaeoecological, taphonomical and sedimentological patterns. Increased baffling of fine-grained material by organisms composing and/or encrusting build-ups is evidenced by muddy sediment containing pascichnial traces surrounding micro-bioherms. Pelmatozoan attachment structures densely encrust micro-bioherms, but are swollen by secondary stereomic overgrowths reflecting some form of antago- nistic interaction or investment in strong affixation to elevated substrates. Clusters of bumastine trilobite material occur in ‘pockets’ related to cavities within build-ups, and otherwise rare spathacalymenid trilobites, often exceptionally preserved, are found in muds in the vicinity of partially buried micro-bioherms. Coeval sections nearby are nearly unfossiliferous as result of dolomitization, but contain recognizable skeletal material in greatest abundance in micro-bioherm flank beds. The occurrence of these bodies within the Massie Formation is genetically linked to a major transgressive epi- sode, but also reflects a mid-Silurian climatic/palaeoceanographic change. □ Build- ups, bumastine trilobites, Echinodermata, holdfasts, Napoleon quarry. James R. Thomka [[email protected]], and Carlton E. Brett [brettce@uc- mail.uc.edu], Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA; manuscript received on 13/04/2014; manuscript accepted on 03/06/2014. Build-ups are common features of the stratigraph- fauna in relatively clear water (Archer & Feldman ical record, and a wide variety of such sedimen- 1986). tary bodies have been described from deposits Although documented from a variety of temporal spanning the Phanerozoic and extending well into and geographic settings, micro-bioherms have per- the Precambrian (Wood 1999; Stanley 2001; Rid- haps been best studied in the Silurian of eastern- ing 2002; Kiessling et al. 2002). Modern coral midcontinental North America. This is not surpris- reefs have attracted considerable attention and ing, as the Silurian Period as a whole was an interval have historically served as a template for compar- of extensive reef and carbonate mound development, ative analysis of ancient build-ups; however, the and the Great Lakes and Cincinnati Arch regions deep-time record of build-ups includes many expose numerous build-ups and associated carbon- structures for which modern analogues are not ate lithofacies (Brunton et al. 1998; Copper 2002). available. Conspicuous among these non-actualis- Nevertheless, micro-bioherms are absent from shal- tic deposits are micro-bioherms, relatively low- low-water lithofacies on the rim of the Michigan relief build-ups composed of micrite, presumably Basin, where sizeable carbonate mounds, in some of microbial origin, and the remains of skeleton- cases extending for more than a kilometre in diame- ized benthic organisms, commonly tabulate corals, ter, occur (Cumings & Shrock 1928; Lowenstam stromatoporoids, laminar bryozoans and pelmato- 1957; Droste & Shaver 1985; Mikulic 1987; Shaver & zoans (Archer & Feldman 1986). Micro-bioherms Sunderman 1989; Mikulic & Kluessendorf 1999). are interpreted as representing the combined Likewise, bioherms of any size are absent from silici- effects of baffling by suspension-feeding macro- clastic-dominated Silurian successions to the east– benthos, in situ micrite production by algae and/ southeast, towards the axis of the Appalachian or microbes and binding by algae and encrusting Foreland Basin (McLaughlin et al. 2008). DOI 10.1111/let.12097 © 2014 Lethaia Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd LETHAIA 48 (2015) Massie Formation (Silurian) micro-bioherms 173 True micro-bioherms developed in intermediate settings of Middle Silurian (Wenlock) age, specifi- A cally in mid- to outer-ramp settings in the Cincin- nati Arch region and the adjacent Wabash Platform (Brett et al. 2012a; Ettensohn et al. 2013), as well as m coeval sections in western New York (Brett et al. 1990). These settings, which are dominated by argil- laceous carbonates and thin mudrock intervals, rep- resent depositional environments that were too deep and/or turbid, at least intermittently, to support B growth of true reefs or large mounds during the Wenlock. Micro-bioherm-bearing deposits are most readily studied in the southeastern Indiana-south- western Ohio-northern Kentucky tristate region, where these bodies display sub-metre relief and m diameters and are not laterally continuous with each other (Fig. 1). Unfortunately, late diagenetic dolomitization has strongly influenced preservation of the Middle Silu- rian succession of the Cincinnati Arch region, result- ing in altered sedimentary fabrics and sparsely fossiliferous sections in units known to represent C normal marine environments (McLaughlin et al. 2008; Ettensohn et al. 2013). Dolomitized micro- bioherms can easily be recognized due to their irreg- ular shape and clumpy, massive texture (Fig. 1A–C), as well as the effects of anisotropic compaction of m overlying sediments around the solid carbonate masses (Fig. 1D). In spite of their prominence in tri- state area strata, micro-bioherms cannot provide detailed data on microstructure, lithology, faunal composition and internal fabric after extensive dolo- mitization. Likewise, unique encrusting faunas or palaeoecological patterns cannot be documented D after alteration via dolomitization. A few undolomitized micro-bioherm-bearing sec- tions have been documented in the Middle Silurian m of southeastern Indiana, but previous research has focused entirely on build-ups within the Homerian (upper Wenlock) Waldron Shale and at the contact Fig. 1. Micro-bioherms in the lower Massie Formation at sev- between the Waldron and underlying Laurel Lime- eral localities in northern Kentucky. The approximate core of stone (Foerste 1898; Kindle & Barnett 1909; Halleck micro-bioherms is marked by the ‘m’. All micro-bioherms shown here are strongly dolomitized and represent the typical 1973; Ausich 1975; Archer & Feldman 1986; Feld- state of such structures in the Cincinnati Arch region. Scale man 1989). Micro-bioherms have recently been rec- bars = 30 cm. A, typical domal micro-bioherm at roadcut on I- 265 exit 19, Jeffersontown, Kentucky (N38°08052.8100, ognized in the Sheinwoodian (lower Wenlock) 0 00 W85°32 33.05 ). B, massive, amorphous micro-bioherm in Massie Formation in this region (McLaughlin et al. roadcut on KY-329, Crestwood, Kentucky (N38°20009.0700, 2008; Brett et al. 2012a; Thomka & Brett 2014a,b), W85°28026.0600). The head of the hammer is resting on the but have not previously been studied with regard to hardground surface upon which the micro-bioherm grew. C, large, massive micro-bioherm underlain by thin interval of their influences on the palaeontology and sedimen- mudstone. Note that the top of the micro-bioherm is truncated tology of the unit containing them. by the erosive base of the upper calcarenitic facies of the Massie Thus, the goals of this study are as follows: (1) to Formation. Same locality as in 1B. D, narrow, indistinct micro- bioherm in roadcut on I-71S, Oldham County, Kentucky present the stratigraphical setting of micro-bioherms (N38°20018.9700, W85°31017.2100). Note that the micro-bioherm in the Massie Formation of southeastern Indiana can be detected primarily because of compactional warping of and interpret the factors controlling their overlying calcareous mudstone. 174 J. R. Thomka & C. E. Brett LETHAIA 48 (2015) occurrence; (2) to document the influences that unit, the Osgood Formation (Foerste 1897), micro-bioherms exerted on the sedimentology, pal- which Pinsak & Shaver (1964) later downgraded aeoecology and taphonomy of the Massie Forma- to the lower member of the Salamonie Dolomite, tion; and (3) to comment on the significance of overlain by the Laurel Member. However, in the these build-ups to Middle Silurian stratigraphical light of recent high-resolution stratigraphical and palaeoceanographic events. research that has demonstrated persistence of eas- ily recognizable sedimentary bodies throughout the greater Cincinnati Arch region, an updated Locality and stratigraphy lithostratigraphical terminology has been applied to southeastern Indiana (Brett et al. 2012a). The One of the few localities that exposes undolomitized term Salamonie Dolomite was rejected entirely lower Wenlock strata in the Cincinnati Arch region within Ripley County and the ‘Laurel Member’ is the New Point Stone quarry, east of the town of was returned to full formational status (Fig. 3A). Napoleon in Ripley County, southeastern Indiana The former ‘Osgood Member’ was split into (N39°12031.3900, W85°18053.7400; Fig. 2). This local- three individual formation-rank units.
Recommended publications
  • Stratographic Coloumn of Iowa
    Iowa Stratographic Column November 4, 2013 QUATERNARY Holocene Series DeForest Formation Camp Creek Member Roberts Creek Member Turton Submember Mullenix Submember Gunder Formation Hatcher Submember Watkins Submember Corrington Formation Flack Formation Woden Formation West Okoboji Formation Pleistocene Series Wisconsinan Episode Peoria Formation Silt Facies Sand Facies Dows Formation Pilot Knob Member Lake Mills Member Morgan Member Alden Member Noah Creek Formation Sheldon Creek Formation Roxana/Pisgah Formation Illinoian Episode Loveland Formation Glasford Formation Kellerville Memeber Pre-Illinoian Wolf Creek Formation Hickory Hills Member Aurora Memeber Winthrop Memeber Alburnett Formation A glacial tills Lava Creek B Volcanic Ash B glacial tills Mesa Falls Volcanic Ash Huckleberry Ridge Volcanic Ash C glacial tills TERTIARY Salt & Pepper sands CRETACEOUS "Manson" Group "upper Colorado" Group Niobrara Formation Fort Benton ("lower Colorado ") Group Carlile Shale Greenhorn Limestone Graneros Shale Dakota Formation Woodbury Member Nishnabotna Member Windrow Formation Ostrander Member Iron Hill Member JURASSIC Fort Dodge Formation PENNSYLVANIAN (subsystem of Carboniferous System) Wabaunsee Group Wood Siding Formation Root Formation French Creek Shale Jim Creek Limestone Friedrich Shale Stotler Formation Grandhaven Limestone Dry Shale Dover Limestone Pillsbury Formation Nyman Coal Zeandale Formation Maple Hill Limestone Wamego Shale Tarkio Limestone Willard Shale Emporia Formation Elmont Limestone Harveyville Shale Reading Limestone Auburn
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Stratigraphy of the Silurian System in Northeastern and Northwestern Illinois
    2UJ?. *& "1 479 S 14.GS: CIR479 STATE OF ILLINOIS c. 1 DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Rock Stratigraphy of the Silurian System in Northeastern and Northwestern Illinois H. B. Willman GEOLOGICAL ILLINOIS ""SURVEY * 10RM* APR 3H986 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John C. Frye, Chief Urbano, IL 61801 CIRCULAR 479 1973 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Time-stratigraphic classification 3 Alexandrian Series 5 Niagaran Series 5 Cayugan Series 6 Regional correlations 6 Northeastern Illinois 6 Development of the classification 9 Wilhelmi Formation 12 Schweizer Member 13 Birds Member 13 Elwood Formation 14 Kankakee Formation 15 Drummond Member 17 Offerman Member 17 Troutman Member 18 Plaines Member 18 Joliet Formation 19 Brandon Bridge Member 20 Markgraf Member 21 Romeo Member 22 Sugar Run Formation . „ 22 Racine Formation 24 Northwestern Illinois 26 Development of the classification 29 Mosalem Formation 31 Tete des Morts Formation 33 Blanding Formation 35 Sweeney Formation 36 Marcus Formation 3 7 Racine Formation 39 References 40 GEOLOGIC SECTIONS Northeastern Illinois 45 Northwestern Illinois 52 FIGURES Figure 1 - Distribution of Silurian rocks in Illinois 2 2 - Classification of Silurian rocks in northeastern and northwestern Illinois 4 3 - Correlation of the Silurian formations in Illinois and adjacent states 7 - CM 4 Distribution of Silurian rocks in northeastern Illinois (modified from State Geologic Map) 8 - lis. 5 Silurian strata in northeastern Illinois 10 ^- 6 - Development of the classification of the Silurian System in |§ northeastern Illinois 11 7 - Distribution of Silurian rocks in northwestern Illinois (modified ;0 from State Geologic Map) 2 7 8 - Silurian strata in northwestern Illinois 28 o 9 - Development of the classification of the Silurian System in CO northwestern Illinois 30 10 - Index to stratigraphic units described in the geologic sections • • 46 ROCK STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SILURIAN SYSTEM IN NORTHEASTERN AND NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS H.
    [Show full text]
  • Tremichnus in Crinoid Pluricolumnals from the Silurian of Western Estonia (Baltica)
    Carnets Geol. 15 (17) Tremichnus in crinoid pluricolumnals from the Silurian of western Estonia (Baltica) Olev VINN 1 Mark A. WILSON 2 William I. AUSICH 3 Ursula TOOM 4 Abstract: Rare pits attributed to Tremichnus have been found in crinoids from the Silurian of Estonia. The Rhuddanian Tremichnus is the earliest symbiont in crinoid columnals of Baltica. These pits presu- mably were domiciles of unknown organisms. Tremichnus had a negative effect on the host crinoid as demonstrated by swollen columnals. Tremichnus in the Silurian of Estonia is less common than similar traces in the Silurian of nearby Gotland. The most important aspect of this study is the rarity of this interaction in these samples in contrast to most other samples of comparable age elsewhere. These structures have a very patchy distribution. Key Words: Trace fossils; Tremichnus; symbiosis; crinoids; Silurian; Estonia. Citation: VINN O., WILSON M.A., AUSICH W.I. & TOOM U. (2015).- Tremichnus in crinoid pluricolumnals from the Silurian of western Estonia (Baltica).- Carnets Geol., Madrid, vol. 15, nº 17, p. 239-243. Résumé : Tremichnus dans des segments de tiges de crinoïdes du Silurien d'Estonie occiden- tale (bouclier balte).- Quelques petites cavités attribuées à Tremichnus ont été trouvées dans des crinoïdes provenant du Silurien d'Estonie. Ce Tremichnus rhuddanien est le symbiote le plus ancien ob- servé dans des segments de tiges de crinoïdes du bouclier balte. Ces cavités correspondent vraisem- blablement à des habitats d'organismes inconnus. Tremichnus a eu un impact négatif sur le crinoïde hôte comme en attestent les renflements des tiges. Tremichnus est moins fréquent dans le Silurien d'Estonie que des traces semblables dans le Silurien du Gotland voisin.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Correlation of Silurian Provincial Series of North America with Global and Regional Chronostratigraphic Units 13 and D Ccarb Chemostratigraphy
    Revised correlation of Silurian Provincial Series of North America with global and regional chronostratigraphic units 13 and d Ccarb chemostratigraphy BRADLEY D. CRAMER, CARLTON E. BRETT, MICHAEL J. MELCHIN, PEEP MA¨ NNIK, MARK A. KLEFF- NER, PATRICK I. MCLAUGHLIN, DAVID K. LOYDELL, AXEL MUNNECKE, LENNART JEPPSSON, CARLO CORRADINI, FRANK R. BRUNTON AND MATTHEW R. SALTZMAN Cramer, B.D., Brett, C.E., Melchin, M.J., Ma¨nnik, P., Kleffner, M.A., McLaughlin, P.I., Loydell, D.K., Munnecke, A., Jeppsson, L., Corradini, C., Brunton, F.R. & Saltzman, M.R. 2011: Revised correlation of Silurian Provincial Series of North America with global 13 and regional chronostratigraphic units and d Ccarb chemostratigraphy. Lethaia,Vol.44, pp. 185–202. Recent revisions to the biostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic assignment of strata from the type area of the Niagaran Provincial Series (a regional chronostratigraphic unit) have demonstrated the need to revise the chronostratigraphic correlation of the Silurian System of North America. Recently, the working group to restudy the base of the Wen- lock Series has developed an extremely high-resolution global chronostratigraphy for the Telychian and Sheinwoodian stages by integrating graptolite and conodont biostratigra- 13 phy with carbonate carbon isotope (d Ccarb) chemostratigraphy. This improved global chronostratigraphy has required such significant chronostratigraphic revisions to the North American succession that much of the Silurian System in North America is cur- rently in a state of flux and needs further refinement. This report serves as an update of the progress on recalibrating the global chronostratigraphic correlation of North Ameri- can Provincial Series and Stage boundaries in their type area.
    [Show full text]
  • Strophomenide and Orthotetide Silurian Brachiopods from the Baltic Region, with Particular Reference to Lithuanian Boreholes
    Strophomenide and orthotetide Silurian brachiopods from the Baltic region, with particular reference to Lithuanian boreholes PETRAS MUSTEIKIS and L. ROBIN M. COCKS Musteikis, P. and Cocks, L.R.M. 2004. Strophomenide and orthotetide Silurian brachiopods from the Baltic region, with particular reference to Lithuanian boreholes. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 49 (3): 455–482. Epeiric seas covered the east and west parts of the old craton of Baltica in the Silurian and brachiopods formed a major part of the benthic macrofauna throughout Silurian times (Llandovery to Pridoli). The orders Strophomenida and Orthotetida are conspicuous components of the brachiopod fauna, and thus the genera and species of the superfamilies Plec− tambonitoidea, Strophomenoidea, and Chilidiopsoidea, which occur in the Silurian of Baltica are reviewed and reidentified in turn, and their individual distributions are assessed within the numerous boreholes of the East Baltic, particularly Lithua− nia, and attributed to benthic assemblages. The commonest plectambonitoids are Eoplectodonta(Eoplectodonta)(6spe− cies), Leangella (2 species), and Jonesea (2 species); rarer forms include Aegiria and Eoplectodonta (Ygerodiscus), for which the new species E. (Y.) bella is erected from the Lithuanian Wenlock. Eight strophomenoid families occur; the rare Leptaenoideidae only in Gotland (Leptaenoidea, Liljevallia). Strophomenidae are represented by Katastrophomena (4 spe− cies), and Pentlandina (2 species); Bellimurina (Cyphomenoidea) is only from Oslo and Gotland. Rafinesquinidae include widespread Leptaena (at least 11 species) and Lepidoleptaena (2 species) with Scamnomena and Crassitestella known only from Gotland and Oslo. In the Amphistrophiidae Amphistrophia is widespread, and Eoamphistrophia, Eocymostrophia, and Mesodouvillina are rare. In the Leptostrophiidae Mesoleptostrophia, Brachyprion,andProtomegastrophia are com− mon, but Eomegastrophia, Eostropheodonta, Erinostrophia,andPalaeoleptostrophia are only recorded from the west in the Baltica Silurian.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section
    Geologic Cross Section I–I′ Through the Appalachian Basin from the Eastern Margin of the Illinois Basin, Jefferson County, Kentucky, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Scott County, Virginia By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, and Christopher S. Swezey Pamphlet B to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3343 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copy- righted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., and Swezey, C.S., 2015, Geologic cross section I–I′ through the Appalachian basin from the eastern margin of the Illinois basin, Jefferson County, Kentucky, to the Valley and Ridge province, Scott County, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3343, 2 sheets and pamphlet A, 41 p.; pamphlet B, 102 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3343.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Issues in the Paleozoic Plateau a Taste of Karst, a Modicum of Geology, and a Whole Lot of Scenery
    GGroundwaterroundwater IssuesIssues inin tthehe PaleozoicPaleozoic PlateauPlateau A Taste of Karst, a Modicum of Geology, and a Whole Lot of Scenery Iowa Groundwater Association Field Trip Guidebook No. 1 Iowa Geological and Water Survey Guidebook Series No. 27 Dunning Spring, near Decorah in Winneshiek County, Iowa September 29, 2008 In Conjunction with the 53rd Annual Midwest Ground Water Conference Grand River Center, Dubuque, Iowa, September 30 – October 2, 2008 Groundwater Issues in the Paleozoic Plateau A Taste of Karst, a Modicum of Geology, and a Whole Lot of Scenery Iowa Groundwater Association Field Trip Guidebook No. 1 Iowa Geological and Water Survey Guidebook Series No. 27 In Conjunction with the 53rd Annual Midwest Ground Water Conference Grand River Center, Dubuque, Iowa, September 30 – October 2, 2008 With contributions by M.K. Anderson Robert McKay Iowa DNR-Water Supply Engineering Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Bruce Blair Jeff Myrom Iowa DNR-Forestry Iowa DNR-Solid Waste Michael Bounk Eric O’Brien Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Karen Osterkamp Lora Friest Iowa DNR-Fisheries Northeast Iowa Resource Conservation and Development Jean C. Prior Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey James Hedges Luther College James Ranum Natural Resources Conservation Service John Hogeman Winneshiek County Landfi ll Operator Robert Rowden Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Claire Hruby Iowa DNR-Geographic Information Systems Joe Sanfi lippo Iowa DNR-Manchester Field Offi ce Bill Kalishek Gary Siegwarth Iowa DNR-Fisheries Iowa DNR-Fisheries George E. Knudson Mary Skopec Luther College Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Bob Libra Stephanie Surine Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Huaibao Liu Paul VanDorpe Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Iowa Department of Natural Resources Richard Leopold, Director September 2008 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .
    [Show full text]
  • Geology for Environmental Planning . in Marion County
    GEOLOGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING . GEOLOGY--:~ .\RY IN MARION COUNTY, INDIANA SURVEY Special Report 19 c . 3 State of)pdiana Department of N'.atural Resources GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN B. PATION, State Geologist MAURICE E. BIGGS, Assistant State Geologist MARY BETH FOX, Mineral Statistician COAL AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS SECTION GEOLOGY SECTION DONALD D. CARR, Geologist and Head ROBERT H. SHAVER, Paleontologist and Head CURTIS H. AULT, Geologist and Associate Head HENRY H. GRAY, Head Stratigrapher PEl-YUAN CHEN, Geologist N. K. BLEUER, Glacial Geologist DONALD L. EGGERT, Geologist EDWIN J. HARTKE, Environmental Geologist GORDON S. FRASER, Geologist JOHN R. HILL, Glacial Geologist DENVER HARPER, Geologist CARL B. REXROAD, Paleontologist WALTER A. HASENMUELLER, Geologist NELSON R. SHAFFER, Geologist GEOPHYSICS SECTION PAUL IRWIN, Geological Assistant MAURICE E. BIGGS, Geophysicist and Head ROBERT F. BLAKELY, Geophysicist JOSEPH F. WHALEY, Geophysicist DRAFTINGANDPHOTOGRAPHYSECTION JOHN R. HELMS, Driller WILLIAM H. MORAN, Chief Draftsman and Head SAMUEL L. RIDDLE, Geophysical Assistant RICHARDT. HILL, Geological Draftsman ROGER L. PURCELL, Senior Geological Draftsman PETROLEUM SECTION GEORGE R. RINGER, Photographer G. L. CARPENTER, Geologist and Head WILBUR E. STALIONS, Artist-Draftsman ANDREW J. HREHA, Geologist BRIAN D. KEITH, Geologist EDUCATIONAL SERVICES SECTION STANLEY J. KELLER, Geologist R. DEE RARICK, Geologist and Head DAN M. SULLIVAN, Geologist JAMES T. CAZEE, Geological Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch
    International Geoscience Programme Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett – Kyle R. Hartshorn – Allison L. Young – Cameron E. Schwalbach – Alycia L. Stigall International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - 2018 - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Kyle R. Hartshorn Dry Dredgers, 6473 Jayfield Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, USA ([email protected]) Allison L. Young Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Cameron E. Schwalbach 1099 Clough Pike, Batavia, OH 45103, USA ([email protected]) Alycia L. Stigall Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Lab, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our thanks to the many colleagues and students who have aided us in our field work, discussions, and publications, including Chris Aucoin, Ben Dattilo, Brad Deline, Rebecca Freeman, Steve Holland, T.J. Malgieri, Pat McLaughlin, Charles Mitchell, Tim Paton, Alex Ries, Tom Schramm, and James Thomka. No less gratitude goes to the many local collectors, amateurs in name only: Jack Kallmeyer, Tom Bantel, Don Bissett, Dan Cooper, Stephen Felton, Ron Fine, Rich Fuchs, Bill Heimbrock, Jerry Rush, and dozens of other Dry Dredgers. We are also grateful to David Meyer and Arnie Miller for insightful discussions of the Cincinnatian, and to Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological-Geotechnical Studies for Siting the Superconducting Super Collider in Illinois: Results of Drilling Large- Diameter Test Holes in 1986
    LIBRARY. «-*/ f ion a JUN 1 2 1997 !L (jcul. ourWEY ; QoJ> 2«AAX-W f&S: EGN 124 GEOLOGICAL-GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES FOR SITING THE SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER IN ILLINOIS: RESULTS OF DRILLING LARGE- DIAMETER TEST HOLES IN 1986 / \ / 3 S z^rf / / y s > ',',',',', ' ', ', ', / ',',',',',, / ^ / / / zrzzzrzzzzz zrzzzzzzzzz. ^/^ ^ * / / / / ^7 R. C. Vaiden / / / / s^r M. J. Hasek / ; ; / ; / / / / /^7 / / / / / y C. R. Gendron * ^ / / ^ 7 ' '. /. /. B. B. Curry - '.', ; / / / ^ — A. M. Graese / / s / s z 5^^ ^ ^ R. A. Bauer /7777 > v v y y -Mum 1988 iiUN 1 3 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY NOTES 124 ''l. STATE GEOiOfiMKiip Department of Energy and Natural Resources ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LIBRARY. Vaiden, Ft. C. Geological-geotechnical studies for siting the Superconducting Super Collider in Illinois: results of drilling large-diameter test holes in 1986/ by R. C. Vaiden ... et al.—Champaign, IL: Illinois State Geological Survey, 1988. 57 p.; 28 cm. — (Environmental Geology Notes; 124) Bibliography: p. 42-44. 1. Geology— Illinois—Kane County. 2. Geology— Illinois—DuPage County. 3. Hydrogeology— Illinois—Kane County. 4. Hydrogeol- ogy— Illinois—DuPage County. 5. Geophysical exploration— Illinois, Northeastern. 6. SSC. I. Title. II. Series. Printed by authority of the State of Illinois 1 1988 1 1500 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 3 3051 00005 5016 GEOLOGICAL-GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES FOR SITING THE SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER IN ILLINOIS: RESULTS OF DRILLING LARGE- DIAMETER TEST HOLES IN 1986 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Morris W. Leighton, Chief Natural Resources Building 61 5 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 R. C. Vaiden M. J. Hasek C. R. Gendron B. B. Curry A. M. Graese R. A. Bauer 1988 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY NOTES 124 JUN13i U.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Cincinnati Arch Region For
    PRELIMINARY HYDROGEOLOGIC EVALUATION OF THE CINCINNATI ARCH REGION FOR UNDERGROUND HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, AND OHIO By Orville B. Lloyd, Jr., and Robert W. Davis U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4098 Raleigh, North Carolina 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information, Copies of this report can contact: be purchased from: Chief, Branch of Nuclear Waste Hydrology Books and Open-File Reports U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey National Center, Mail Stop 410 Federal Center, Building 810 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Box 25425 Reston, Virginia 22092 Denver, Colorado 80225 or District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Post Office Box 2857 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Telephone: (919) 856-4510 CONTENTS Page Abstract. ............................... 1 Introduction. ............................. 2 Background ............................ 2 Purpose and scope. ........................ 4 Previous investigations. ..................... 4 Acknowledgments.......................... 6 Methods of investigation. ....................... 6 Hydrogeology of the sedimentary rocks ................. 8 General geology. ......................... 8 Hydrogeologic framework. ..................... 14 Basal sandstone aquifer ................... 14 Potential confining unit. .................. 17 Distribution and source of freshwater, saline water, and brine. ........................... 19 Ground-water occurrence and
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    information t o u s e r s This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of usefs indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]