Final JGOFS Newsletter Volume 12, Number 4 November 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final JGOFS Newsletter Volume 12, Number 4 November 2004 U.S. JGOFS: A Component of the U.S. Global Change Research Program U.S. JGOFS NEWS Volume 12, Number 4 November 2004 Do We Now Understand The Ocean’s Biological Pump? by Jorge L. Sarmiento, John Dunne and Robert A. Armstrong core problem for global carbon- layer or increases in irradiance. It is a measure of its effectiveness in Acycle research is to explain the fundamentally unstable, disappear- reducing surface nutrients relative to role of the oceanic “biological pump” ing rapidly when resources become subsurface values. We defi ne it more in determining levels of dissolved limited, and has a high ef-ratio.-ratio. WWee specifi cally as the average nitrate inorganic carbon (DIC) in surface wa- now think that a large fraction of level at depths in the range of 100 to ters and the exchange of carbon be- oceanic variability in the ef-ratio-ratio dde-e- 200 meters, minus the average in the tween ocean and atmosphere. Surface pends upon whether a given region top 100 meters, divided by the aver- nutrient concentrations are key to supports just the regeneration system age in the 100- to 200-meter range predicting this exchange because un- or the export pathway as well. (Figure 1). We use nitrate observa- used nutrients in the upper ocean al- Is knowledge of the relationship tions in the upper 100 meters from low associated carbon dioxide (CO2) of ef-ratio-ratio ttoo tthehe sstructuretructure ooff pplank-lank- summertime, when surface nutrients to escape into the atmosphere. What tonic food webs either necessary are at a minimum and the effi ciency have we learned during the JGOFS or suffi cient for understanding the is at its maximum. Thus a region in era that can help us understand what biological pump? We would argue which summer surface-layer nutrient controls the strength and effi ciency that it is neither. levels are equal to deep nutrient of the biological pump? A key concept for analyzing the levels has an effi ciency of 0%, and A new paradigm of ecological biological pump is the distinction be- one in which summer surface-layer systems in the surface ocean has tween its strength and its effi ciency. nutrients are totally depleted has an emerged during the last several years, We defi ne the strength of the pump effi ciency of 100%. focused on the relative roles of the as the magnitude of the export of or- Figure 2a shows that the strength regeneration of nutrients versus their ganic matter. For example, a location of the biological pump and its effi - export. The regeneration system such as the Bermuda Atlantic Time ciency are generally inversely related includes the smallest autotrophs, Series (BATS) station in the Sargasso to each other. For example, the picoplankton that are generally Sea where the export of organic mat- high-latitude regions of the Southern only able to utilize ammonium; ter is 4 moles of carbon per square Ocean have a strong but ineffi cient a microbial loop that consists of meter per year (mol C/m2/yr), has a biological pump. Conversely, the heterotrophic bacteria and the dis- stronger biological pump than one low-latitude subtropical gyres have a solved organic matter on which they with an export of 2 mol C/m2/yr, weak but effi cient biological pump. live, and small protists that graze such as the Hawaii Ocean Time-series While the strength of the biologi- on bacteria and picoplankton. This station (HOT) in the north Pacifi c cal pump is important in determin- system is ubiquitous and stable. It oligotrophic gyre (Figure 1b). ing the export of organic matter has a low ef-ratio,-ratio, defidefi nneded aass tthehe ffrac-rac- The maximum possible strength and thus the biological activity in tion of productivity that is supported of the biological pump at a given the deep ocean, the effi ciency of the by nutrients supplied from external location is limited by the supply of biological pump is the key factor in sources such as the nutricline or the macronutrients in the upwelling determining the balance of carbon atmosphere. water and the stoichiometric ratio of between the atmosphere and the The export pathway, on the carbon to nitrogen to phosphorus in ocean, at least in regions where other hand, comprises the classical the organic matter exported from the the supply of nutrients and carbon diatom-based food chain, including surface. Nitrogen fi xation and aeo- from below is high. This is because copepods and other large zooplank- lian fi xed nitrogen also contribute, it is ultimately the effi ciency of the ton predators. It is opportunistic, but to a lesser extent. biological pump in stripping out as responding rapidly to injections of In contrast, we defi ne the ef- nutrients, shoaling of the mixed fi ciency of the biological pump as Continued on page 2 much carbon as possible from up- its link to the ef-ratio-ratio ttellell uuss aboutabout pump effi ciency. welling waters that determines how biological pump effi ciency? Given If the ef-ratio-ratio ddoesoes notnot indicateindicate tthehe much of the excess carbon stored in the relationship between the export effi ciency of the biological pump, the deep ocean can escape back into pathway and high ef-ratios,-ratios, oonene what does? While ocean circulation the atmosphere. In regions such as might expect high ef-ratio-ratio eenviron-nviron- plays an important role, effi ciency is the Southern Ocean where the bio- ments to have an effi cient biological clearly modulated by other factors. logical pump effi ciency is low, CO2 is pump and vice-versa. In fact, most The regions characterized by low able to escape from the deep waters of the world ocean exhibits the biological pump effi ciency in Figure that upwell there. Thus the average opposite relationship (Figure 2b). For 1d generally correspond to areas atmospheric concentration is higher example, the Southern Ocean has where the supply of nutrients from than it would be if the effi ciency of a high ef-ratio-ratio bbutut a llowow biologicalbiological upwelling and deep wintertime mix- the pump were high. pump effi ciency; the subtropical ing is high. However, there are areas gyres, on the other hand, have a low of high biological pump effi ciency What Governs Pump Effi ciency? -ratio but a highly effi cient biological that have extremely high nutrient What does the JGOFS-era para- pump. Thus knowledge of the ef-ratio-ratio supply, such as coastal regions. digm of the surface ecosystem and does not help us predict biological As a result of JGOFS-era discover- A) Primary Production (mmol C m-2 d-1) B) Particle Export Ratio 500 0.65 80°N 80°N 70 0.40 0.35 40°N 60 40°N 0.30 50 0.25 0° 40 0° 0.20 30 0.15 40°S 40°S 20 0.10 10 0.05 80°S 80°S 0 0.00 0° 100°E 160°W 60°W 0° 100°E 160°W 60°W C)C) Particle Export (mmol C m-2 d-1) D) Biological Pump Efficiency 100 1.0 80°N 80°N 20 0.9 0.8 15 40°N 40°N 0.7 10 0.6 0° 8 0° 0.5 6 0.4 0.3 40°S 4 40°S 0.2 2 0.1 80°S 80°S 0 0.0 0° 100°E 160°W 60°W 0° 100°E 160°W 60°W Figure 1: (a) Primary production estimated by a combination of empirical models using satellite-based estimates of chlorophyll. (b) Particle export ratio (particle export divided by primary production) estimated from satellite-based chlorophyll estimates and temperature distributions using an empirical model developed by John Dunne. (c) Particle export calculated by taking the product of the particle export ratio times the primary production. (d) Estimate of the effi ciency of the oceanic biological pump calculated from climatic average nitrate observations. Effi ciency is 100% when organisms deplete surface nutrients totally. It is 0% when no biological removal of upwelled nutrients occurs. 2 U.S. JGOFS Newsletter – November 2004 ies, we now generally believe that this hypothesis to the global of the region. Mitchell and his col- iron limitation plays a crucial role context, we fi nd that the overall leagues defi ned light limitation, not in limiting the uptake of nutrients, lower supply of iron to the ocean by the usual Sverdrup criterion of most particularly in the high-nutri- in the Southern Hemisphere may the threshold light supply necessary ent, low-chlorophyll areas that occur explain much of the remarkable to get a bloom started, but rather by predominantly in the Southern difference between the waters of the the light supply that is required to Ocean and the Southern Hemisphere Northern Hemisphere and those of deplete nutrients completely. subtropics (Figure 3a) and in the the Southern Hemisphere in terms of Given deep summertime mixing, North and equatorial Pacifi c (Figure biological pump strength, effi ciency frequent cloudiness, phytoplankton 3b). and ef-ratio-ratio (Figure(Figure 2).2). TToo cconfionfi rrmm self-shading and an extremely high What is the role of iron? Because of this hypothesis, we turn to seven nutrient supply, the Southern Ocean the inverse relationship between ef- major mesoscale iron fertilization might never experience total deple- ratio and export effi ciency observed experiments conducted during the tion of nutrients in surface waters in our analysis, we suggest that the JGOFS era. even if the iron supply were ad- critical role of iron is not associated These experiments demonstrate equate.
Recommended publications
  • Prof Michael Fasham Collection
    National Oceanographic Library - Archive Prof Michael Fasham FRS, Collection Mike Fasham joined the National Institute of Oceanography in 1968 and, with Jim Crease, developed one of the first shipboard computer systems in the world. He also began cooperating with Martin Angel, to use multivariate statistical techniques to analyse the zoogeographic distribution of zooplankton. This was a major achievement in a field which was largely descriptive at the time, and in 1973 he joined the Marine Biology department, where he brought his strong mathematical skills to bear on a range of topics. In the late 70s and early 80s, Mike worked on the centuries old question of what produces spatial variability, or “patchiness”, in plankton, using both theoretical and observational approaches. He added an in situ fluorometer to the SeaSoar undulator to map the small-scale distribution of phytoplankton. Between 1970 and 1980, he carried out theoretical and observational studies of temporal and spatial distributions of plankton, and developed models of the ocean carbon and nitrogen cycles. He also had a strong interest in the role of the oceans in climate change. His classic paper ‘A nitrogen-based model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer’ (1990) has been cited more than 500 times. The Fasham-Ducklow-McKelvie model, as it became known, was subsequently embedded in the first three-dimensional ecosystem model of the Atlantic developed at Princeton University. Mike Fasham became Head of the Biological Modelling Group in the George Deacon Division of the Southampton Oceanography Centre (SOC), which was established in 1995. From 1998 to 2000, he also served as chairman of the international committee of the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS), which was aimed at understanding the fluxes of carbon and associated nutrients in the ocean Mike Fasham played a key role in the development of the international Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS), serving on the National and International Committees and ultimately as chair of the International Committee from 1998 to 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Review 1988 &
    Science Review 1988 & ‘89 (This Page Blank in the Original) Research 1988 and ‘89 in review S. B. MacPhee, D. I. Ross, and H. B. Nicholls Society, replacing Dr. David Aiken; = Dr. Trevor Platt (DFO) was the 1988 re- cipient of the G. Evelyn Hutchinson Medal of the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, the highest award given by the society; = Kate Moran (DEMR) was appointed Chairperson of the Shipboard Measure- ments Panel of the international Ocean Drilling Project; and = Dr. A.R. Longhurst (DFO) was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. D. I. Ross. S. B. MacPhee, and H. B. Nicholls Huntsman Award: The A. G. Hunts- man Award for excellence in the marine The years 1988 and ‘89 were interest- Hydrography Branch, Mr. Paul Bellemare sciences is awarded annually. It is admin- ing and fruitful ones for the research and was appointed Regional Director of istered by a private foundation based at survey programs carried out at the Bed- Hydrography in May 1988. Subsequently, BIO. ford Institute of Oceanography, the Hali- Mr. Reginald Lewis was appointed Re- The following two Huntsman Awards fax Fisheries Research Laboratory, and gional Field Superintendent. were presented during the period covered the St. Andrews Biological Station. In the The following senior staff changes by this Review. following paragraphs, information is pro- were made in the Atlantic vided on a number of the significant Geoscience Centre (AGC) of events that occurred during those years at DEMR. In August 1988, Dr. the laboratories of the Department of Fish- David Ross was appointed Direc- eries and Oceans (DFO) and at those of the tor of AGC, succeeding Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Synthesis Group Meeting
    JGOFS REPORT No. 34 FIRST MEETING of the NORTH ATLANTIC SYNTHESIS GROUP, 1998 SECOND MEETING of the NORTH ATLANTIC SYNTHESIS GROUP, 1999 THIRD MEETING of the NORTH ATLANTIC SYNTHESIS GROUP, 2001 OCTOBER 2001 Published in Bergen, Norway, October 2001 by: Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research and JGOFS International Project Office Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Centre for Studies of Environment and Resources The Johns Hopkins University University of Bergen Baltimore, MD 21218 5020 Bergen USA NORWAY The Joint Global Ocean Flux Study of the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) is a Core Project of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP). It is planned by a SCOR/IGBP Scientific Steering Committee. In addition to funds from the JGOFS sponsors, SCOR and IGBP, support is provided for international JGOFS planning and synthesis activities by several agencies and organizations. These are gratefully acknowledged and include the US National Science Foundation, the International Council of Scientific Unions (by funds from the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization), the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, the Research Council of Norway and the University of Bergen, Norway. Citation: First meeting of the North Atlantic Synthesis Group, 1998; Second Meeting of the North Atlantic Synthesis Group, 1999; Third Meeting of the North Atlantic Synthesis Group, 2001. JGOFS Report No. 34. October 2001. ISSN: 1016-7331 Cover: JGOFS and SCOR Logos The JGOFS Reports are distributed free of
    [Show full text]
  • 24-26 August 1999, Baltimore, Maryland
    JGOFS Executives Committee Meeting The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA 24-26 August 1999 Table of Contents Opening Remarks and Arrangement.............................................................................................1 Approval of the Agenda ................................................................................................................1 Old Business..................................................................................................................................2 New Business ................................................................................................................................4 JGOFS and IPO Finance ...............................................................................................................8 Open Science Conference .............................................................................................................9 Science Brochure.........................................................................................................................10 Synthesis Textbook .....................................................................................................................11 The Future of Ocean Biogeochemical Research .........................................................................12 Other Business.............................................................................................................................14 Annex 1 - List of Participants .....................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Empirical Algorithms for an Improved Identification Of
    METHODS published: 19 May 2017 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00126 Regional Empirical Algorithms for an Improved Identification of Phytoplankton Functional Types and Size Classes in the Mediterranean Sea Using Satellite Data Annalisa Di Cicco 1*, Michela Sammartino 1, Salvatore Marullo 1, 2 and Rosalia Santoleri 1 1 Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council (CNR), Rome, Italy, 2 National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Frascati, Italy Regional relationships to estimate the main Phytoplankton Functional Types (PFTs) and Size Classes (PSCs) from satellite data are presented. Following the abundance-based approach and selecting the Total Chlorophyll a (TChla) as descriptor of the trophic status of the environment, empirical relations between the TChla concentration and seven accessory pigments, marker for the main algal groups, have been developed for the Mediterranean Sea. Using only in-situ data acquired in this basin, firstly a Edited by: previous regional diagnostic pigment analysis has been conducted to evaluate the Shubha Sathyendranth, specific pigment ratios featuring the phytoplankton assemblage that occurs in the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK Mediterranean Sea. Secondly, the new regional PFT and PSC algorithms have been Reviewed by: calibrated and validated on the in-situ dataset. The statistical analysis showed a very Emmanuel Devred, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, good predictive power for all the new regional models. A quantitative comparison Canada with global abundance-based models applied to our validation dataset showed that Jochen Wollschläger, University of Oldenburg, Germany the regionalization improves the uncertainty and the spread of about one order of *Correspondence: magnitude for all the classes (e.g., in the nano class, where the mean bias error improves − Annalisa Di Cicco from −0.056 to 0.001 mg m 3).
    [Show full text]
  • How Nature's Ecosystem Services Contribute to the Wellbeing of New
    Lin Roberts, Ann Brower, Geoff Kerr, Simon Lambert, Wendy McWilliam, Kevin Moore, John Quinn, David Simmons, Simon Thrush, Mike Townsend, Paul Blaschke, Robert Costanza, Ross Cullen, Ken Hughey and Steve Wratten This report was written by: Lin Roberts1, Ann Brower1, Geoff Kerr1, Simon Lambert1, Wendy McWilliam1, Kevin Moore1, John Quinn2, David Simmons1, Simon Thrush2,3, Mike Townsend2, Paul Blaschke4, Robert Costanza5, Ross Cullen1, Ken Hughey1, Steve Wratten1 1 Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand. Email: [email protected] 2 NIWA, PO Box 11115, Hillcrest, Hamilton 3251, New Zealand. 3 Current address: Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. 4 Blaschke & Rutherford Environmental Consultants, 34 Pearce Street, Vogeltown, Wellington 6021, New Zealand. 5 Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. It may be cited as: Roberts, L.; Brower, A.; Kerr, G.; Lambert, S.; McWilliam, W.; Moore, K.; Quinn, J.; Simmons, D.; Thrush, S.; Townsend, M.; Blaschke, P.; Costanza, R.; Cullen, R.; Hughey, K.; Wratten, S. 2015: The nature of wellbeing: how nature’s ecosystem services contribute to the wellbeing of New Zealand and New Zealanders. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 145 p. Cover photo: Herb Christophers. This report is available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright March 2015, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN 978–0–478–15034–6 (web PDF) The nature of wellbeing How nature’s ecosystem services contribute to the wellbeing of New Zealand and New Zealanders Lin Roberts Ann Brower, Geoff Kerr, Simon Lambert, Wendy McWilliam, Kevin Moore, John Quinn, David Simmons, Simon Thrush, Mike Townsend, Paul Blaschke, Robert Costanza, Ross Cullen, Ken Hughey and Steve Wratten CONTENts Executive summary 1 Prologue: Ki uta ki tai—from the mountains to the sea 6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research
    SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON OCEANIC RESEARCH SCOR Proceedings Vol. 39 Moscow, Russia September 2003 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON OCEANIC RESEARCH October 2002 - October 2004 President: Ex-Officio Members: Prof. Robert A. Duce Annelies C. Pierrot-Bults (IABO) Dept. of Oceanography Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics Texas A&M University Zoological Museum College Station, TX 77843-3146, USA University of Amsterdam Tel: +1-979 -845-5756 P.O. Box 94766 Fax: +1-979-862-8978 1090 GT Amsterdam E-mail: [email protected] THE NETHERLANDS Tel: +31-20-525-7194 Secretary: Fax: +31-20-525-5402 Dr. Julie Hall E-mail: [email protected] National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Ltd. P.O. Box 11-115, Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND Prof. Shiro Imawaki (IAPSO) Tel: +64-7-856-1709 Research Institute for Applied Mechanics Fax: +64-7-856-0151 Kyushu University E-mail: [email protected] Kasuga, Fukuoka 816-8580, JAPAN Tel: +81-92-583-7736 Past President: Fax: +81-92-584-2570 Prof. John Field E-mail: [email protected] Zoology Department University of Cape Town Dr. Michael MacCracken (IAMAS) 7701 Rondebosch, SOUTH AFRICA 6308 Berkshire Drive Tel: +27-21-650-3612 Bethesda MD 20814, USA Fax: +27-21-685-3937 or 650-3726 Tel: +1-301-564-4255 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Vice-Presidents: Co-opted Members: Dr. Laurent Labeyrie Dr. Ilana Wainer Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environment Dept. Oceanografia Fisica - Universidade de Sao Paulo Unité mixte CEA-CNRS Praca do Oceanografico 191 - 05508-900, Sao Paulo Bat 12, Domaine du CNRS, av.
    [Show full text]
  • JGOFS 8/00 Final
    U.S. JGOFS: A Component of the U.S. Global Change Research Program U.S. JGOFS NEWS Volume 10, Number 4 August 2000 Incorporating Iron into a Global Ecosystem Model Assessing The Progress by J. Keith Moore and Scott C. Doney Of JGOFS: Highlights ne of the main goals of JGOFS is We have developed a marine eco- Oto gain a better understanding system model that does just that, Of The Open Science of the processes controlling carbon building on the data collected during Conference cycling and export in marine ecosys- U.S. JGOFS and other field studies, tems. A major finding from the pro- such as the iron fertilization experi- by Margaret C. Bowles cess studies and time series stations is ments (IronEx) conducted in the that nitrogen available in the eu- equatorial Pacific. Because it incorpo- ver the 13 years since it was photic zone is often not the sole fac- rates iron dynamics, the model is able launched, JGOFS has sponsored O tor controlling carbon export. Phy- to reproduce the high nutrient, low several science symposia that have of- toplankton growth, export produc- chlorophyll (HNLC) conditions ob- fered opportunities to assess both the tion and community structure appear served in the subarctic Northeast Pa- progress of the program itself and the to be governed by the availability of cific, the equatorial Pacific and the evolution of ocean biogeochemistry both the macronutrients (nitrate, Southern Ocean. as a discipline. As knowledge about phosphate and silicate) and the mi- The numerical model has two size the ocean’s role in global carbon cy- cronutrient iron.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Roles of Microbes in Marine Pelagic Food Webs: a Brief History
    Kirchman (ed) Advances in Microbial Ecology of the Oceans Sherr and Sherr 1 of 24 April 27, 2007 revision Understanding roles of microbes in marine pelagic food webs: a brief history Evelyn and Barry Sherr Introduction “The sea harbors an extensive population of bacteria, varying greatly in numbers and in the variety of their activities.’ Waksman 1934; “…microorganisms are widely distributed in sea water and on the ocean floor, where they influence chemical, physiochemical, geological, and biological conditions.” ZoBell, 1946. Progress in understanding of microbes in ocean systems has depended both on the research focus of individual scientists, and on the development of novel approaches to study of microbes in the sea. A brief history of the study of ecological roles of microbes in the sea shows that many of the current research thrusts were of interest early on in the development of the field. Often, however, progress on specific facets of marine microbial ecology was impeded by lack of instrumentation and methods to address the problems. A great deal of what we know about marine microbes has only been discovered since the mid-1970’s. New methodology, including molecular genetics approaches and major oceanographic expeditions in the past few decades, have revolutionized our understanding of the vital roles microbes play in marine ecosystems. Every aquatic microbiologist working during the 1970’s and 1980’s has a unique perspective of the development of the field at that time. Our own perspective is influenced by our years at the University of Georgia Marine Institute on Sapelo Island, where L. R..Pomeroy and colleagues did research that led to novel concepts about the role of microbes in marine ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • JGOFS Executive Committee Meeting
    JGOFS Executive Committee Meeting DRAFT MINUTES (as of 22 December 2003) Drafted by Roger B. Hanson and Bernard Avril (JGOFS IPO) Solstrand Fjord Hotel Os (Bergen), Norway 26-27 September 2003 2 Table of Contents 1 Opening Address.....................................................................................................................2 2 Old Business............................................................................................................................3 2.1 Minutes of the 18th SSC Meeting in Washington DC....................................................3 2.2 JGOFS Open Science Conference (Washington DC).....................................................4 3 New Business ..........................................................................................................................4 3.1 Norwegian Tour and Banquet .........................................................................................4 3.2 Legacy Products ..............................................................................................................5 3.3 IGBP Global Change NewsLetter Article (JGOFS Achievements)................................5 3.4 JGOFS Datasets and Information: DVD version 2 .........................................................6 3.5 Archive of Out-of-Print JGOFS Report series ................................................................6 4 IGBP and SCOR Programmes ................................................................................................7 4.1 Congress and Earth System
    [Show full text]
  • In Practice No
    Member of PPS9 | Ecological Networks | A New road to Travel | Records – Two Sides to the Story The World Conservation Union Number 51 Ecology & Environmental Management March N RACTICE 2006 IBulletin of the InstituteP of Ecology and Environmental Management their anthropocentricity. For example, in the so-called ‘Hannover Principles’ Will Planning Policy prepared for the World Expo in 2000, William McDonough, a leading exponent of sustainable development and design in the USA, stated that: Statement 9 make a ‘In order to embrace the idea of a global ecology with intrinsic value, Signifi cant Contribution to the meaning [of sustainable development] must be expanded to allow all parts of nature to meet their own needs now and in the future.’ (William Sustainable Development? McDonough & Partners 1992). Their suggestion is that by focusing primarily on the needs and rights of man as the key goal of sustainable development, and reinforcing the widely held conceit that other species exist merely to serve man’s needs, we are Dr Lincoln Garland MIEEM and unlikely ever to achieve truly sustainable development. Dr Mike Wells CEnv MIEEM Unfortunately, biodiversity and new development have historically been in Introduction direct confrontation. Development that has caused net harm to biodiversity and nature conservation interests has without doubt been more the rule In 1987 the World Commission Report on Environment and Development (the than the exception (Oxford 2000); and this has continued despite the Bruntland Commission) defi ned sustainable development as ‘development Bruntland Commission report. Many other authors have since agreed that that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of conservation and enhancement of biodiversity should be a fundamental future generations to meet their own needs’.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytoplankton/Microzooplankton Studies
    PICES Scientific Report No. 32 2006 Report of the 2005 Workshop on Oceanic Ecodynamics Comparison in the Subarctic Pacific May 23–24, 2005 Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A. Edited by Charles B. Miller and Tsutomu Ikeda September 2006 Secretariat / Publisher North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES) P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, B.C., Canada. V8L 4B2 E-mail: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.pices.int List of Participants CANADA Cullen, Jay T. Kobari, Toru School of Earth and Ocean Sciences Aquatic Resource Science Division University of Victoria Faculty of Fisheries P.O. Box 3055 STN CSC Kagoshima University Victoria, BC 4-50-20 Shimoarata, Kagoshima Canada V8W 3P6 Japan 890-0056 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] • Iron availability and iron cycling • Zooplankton development and growth Galbraith, Moira Kuma, Kenshi Institute of Ocean Sciences Graduate School of Fisheries Science Fisheries and Oceans Canada Hokkaido University P.O. Box 6000 3-1-1 Minato-cho, Hakodate, Hokkaido Sidney, BC Japan 041-8611 Canada V8L 4B2 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] • Marine chemistry (Fe) • Mesozooplankton distribution pattern Ota, Takashi Mackas, David L. Department of Biotechnology Institute of Ocean Sciences Ishinomaki Senshu University Fisheries and Oceans Canada 1 Sinmito, Minamisakai, Ishinomaki P.O. Box 6000 Japan 986-8580 Sidney, BC E-mail: [email protected] Canada V8L 4B2 • Microzooplankton E-mail: [email protected] • Mesozooplankton distribution
    [Show full text]