DOCSLIB.ORG

Iii. Architectural and Development Overview Iii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iii. Architectural and Development Overview Iii III. ARCHITECTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW III. ARCHITECTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW A. Brief Summary of Leesburg’s Development Created from a portion of Fairfax Scots-Irish and Germans arrived from The Carolina Road was first referred County, Loudoun County was Pennsylvania and the English from to as the Shenandoah Hunting Path established by an Act of the Virginia Virginia’s Tidewater region. and originally connected Frederick, General Assembly in 1757. The Maryland to a Native American Leesburg was laid out at the crossroads following year, John Carlyle, an trading post on the Roanoke River of two early Virginia roads, the Alexandria merchant, sold a portion of at the Virginia-North Carolina line Alexandria Road (Loudoun Street) and his landholdings to Nicolas Minor. John near present day Clarksville, Virginia. the Carolina Road (King Street). Hough was commissioned to survey this Today it is Virginia State Route 15, also small settlement for a new town to serve The Alexandria Road historically referred to as the Old Carolina Road. as the county seat. linked the port city of Alexandria with As the only major town located on the market center at Winchester. It is The town was established in 1758 the north-south trading route, and as known today as Virginia State Route 7 and named Leesburg, in honor of the the county seat for Loudoun County and has also been called the Alexandria- prominent Lee family of Virginia. (1757), Leesburg grew steadily Leesburg Turnpike and Leesburg Pike Early settlers to the Leesburg area throughout the eighteenth and early- throughout its history. came in search of good farmland. The nineteenth centuries. The original plan of Leesburg was completed by John Hough in 1759. Leesburg Old and Historic District Design Guidelines 7 III. ARCHITECTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW A. Brief Summary of Leesburg’s Development, continued The sale of the 70 original town lots was accompanied by the requirement that the half-acre lot be built upon within three years. The guidelines for the original town set the minimum dimensions for a building at 20 feet by 17 feet with a roof ridge at least 9 feet high. It was also specified that the structure must be built of brick, stone, or wood with a masonry chimney. A number of these early structures have been preserved and established the use of indigenous materials such as wood, fieldstone, and brick. Westward expansion surged at the end of the Revolutionary War, and Leesburg served as a gateway for this expansion. A photo, taken around 1900, of an early Leesburg building once incorrectly rumored to have served as Surviving architecture of this period Washington’s headquarters. shows an increase in the size of the structure and the level of craftsmanship. In 1835, A Comprehensive Gazetteer of Virginia described the town as a “well-built and neat village” with fifty houses, twenty-two general stores, three churches, a bank, six schools, four taverns, two apothecaries, paved streets and municipal water supplied through wooden pipes. As settlements grew to the west, the need increased for efficient ways to bring farm goods to market. This growth led to the construction of the Leesburg Turnpike by 1820 and an extension to the west in the following decade. Increased trade meant new prosperity for the town. This wealth was displayed by the construction of highly detailed Federal-style houses in the urban tradition of Alexandria and other fashionable coastal cities. Gray’s New Map of Leesburg from 1878. 8 Leesburg Old and Historic District Design Guidelines III. ARCHITECTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW By the eve of the Civil War, the growing of 350 Union soldiers. The Confederate mass-produced building materials town was an established trading center troops would be forced south six transported from major manufacturing and accessible by road, ferry and rail. months later, burning mills and bridges centers to Leesburg via the railroad The expanded thirty-six-block town as they left. Occupied and shelled but also by the presence in Leesburg of is illustrated on Gray’s New Map of by Union troops, the town witnessed the Norris Brothers’ Planing Mill and Leesburg, the basis for the boundaries of frequent movement of troops and raids Lumber Works. In the early-twentieth- the original (1969) Leesburg Old and throughout the duration of the war. century, as suburban northern Virginia Historic District (OHD). experienced a population surge, a Between the end of the Civil War and number of downtown lots were further The Alexandria, Loudoun and World War I, Leesburg continued to subdivided to allow for residential infill. Hampshire Railroad (AL&H) had grow with much of this development reached Leesburg in 1860 with a occurring in areas near and outside of Post-World War II growth lead to a route paralleling that of the Leesburg the town boundaries. It was during late-twentieth-century explosion of Turnpike. The railroads brought visitors this period that several of the late- subdivisions and commercial areas escaping the cities of Washington, eighteenth and early-nineteenth century bringing one of the most architecturally Georgetown and Alexandria as well as dwellings in the Nicholas Minor section, significant early townscapes in the state. factory-made building materials. Union the downtown core, were converted to troops destroyed the tracks and bridges commercial use. Through the foresight of nearly half- of this major supply line and held the a-century of preservation efforts, line until the close of the war. This increase in commercial activity Leesburg’s OHD, noted for its collection corresponded to an increase in of well-preserved, late-eighteenth During the Civil War, Leesburg was the residential construction. This through early-nineteenth-century scene of the 1861 Battle of Ball’s Bluff, expansion was made possible not only by structures, is preserved for today and a Confederate victory with the capture the inexpensive and highly decorative, the future. A view looking south on King Street around 1900 at the intersection of A similar view looking south on King Street around 1935 shows larger Market Street. The iron fence which surrounds the courthouse property is buildings and a streetscape influenced by the arrival of the automobile. just visible on the left. Leesburg Old and Historic District Design Guidelines 9 III. ARCHITECTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW B. Historic District Character and Neighborhoods Leesburg’s neighborhoods add Leesburg’s Old and Historic District Any building—whether an existing complexity, richness, and variety preserves the sense of place established structure or one that has yet to be built— to the OHD, and reflect the town’s by the immediate streetscape view fits into its larger context by degrees development patterns and history. Each as well as the district overall. Any of relationship that are based on the neighborhood is characterized by a existing or new building relates to individual’s view of a building within unique combination of building forms, its surroundings in a variety of ways, its surroundings. This approach may be architectural styles, and site features. including site planning, building design, considered as a series of concentric rings and materials. It relates not only to its that radiate out from that structure. Descriptions of the neighborhoods are immediate surroundings but also to the Each building relates immediately to provided to summarize their general broader context of the neighborhood those structures and site features that character. Neighborhoods do not have in which it is located and the district immediately surround it. From that hard borders. Neighborhoods are as a whole. point, it relates to the surrounding not intended to be mini-districts with neighborhood and, ultimately, to the separate design guidelines. entire historic district. 1 5 2 4 6 3 9 8 Old and Historic District Neighborhoods 1. West Market Street Gateway (page 11) 2.Old West and Market Historic Street District Neighborhoods Neighborhoods (page 12) 7 3.Old West and Market Historic Street District South (pageNeighborhoods 12) 4.1. DowntownWest Market (page Street 13) Gateway (page 11) 5.1.2. NorthWest KingMarket Street Street Gateway NeighborhoodsGateway (page (page14) (page11) 12) 2. West Market Street Neighborhoods (page 12) 6.3. EastWest Market Market Street Street Gateway South (page(page 15) 12) 3.4. WestDowntown Market (page Street 13) South (page 12) 7.4.5. TownDowntownNorth Branch King (pageStreet & W&OD 13)Gateway Trail Area (page (page 14) 16) 8.5.6. VinegarNorthEast Market King Hill (page Street Street 17) Gateway Gateway (page (page 14) 15) 9.6.7. SouthEastTown Market KingBranch Street Street & W&ODGateway Gateway Trail (page Area(page 18) (page 15) 16) 7.8. TownVinegar Branch Hill (page & W&OD 17) Trail Area (page 16) The8.9. Old VinegarSouth and Historic King Hill StreetDistrict(page Gateway 17)is divided (pageinto neighborhoods 18) which each have a unique scale and architectural and streetscape character. The character9. South of each King neighborhood Street Gateway informs (page appropriate 18) treatments for new development. 10 Leesburg Old and Historic District Design Guidelines III. ARCHITECTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW 1. West Market Street Gateway The western entrance to the OHD Forms, Scale, and Styles: single-family, is characterized by large single-family 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 stories; vernacular homes deeply set back on large Victorian, Italianate, Queen Anne, landscaped properties. These dwellings Colonial Revival; gable, cross-gable, were predominantly built between the hipped roofs, small-paned windows, 1850s and mid-1900s, as well as the two-over-two windows, one-over-one circa 1830 Rock Spring Farm. More windows; one-story, one or three recent construction respects these earlier bay porches forms. This neighborhood includes the non-contributing West Green Materials: brick, stone, poured and development, which is very different concrete block foundations; wood in architectural character and site porches; slate shingle, standing- characteristics from the rest of seam metal, asphalt shingle roofs; the neighborhood.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5 Transportation
    Chapter 5 Transportation Goals • Provide for efficient and reliable movement for all transportation modes • Manage the impact of regional and local traffic on residential neighborhoods • Maximize safety and dependability • Encourage people to walk and bicycle • Reduce congestion for environmental benefits • Manage the effects of regional development and travel trends Town of Vienna comprehensive plan Introduction This chapter describes the Transportation Plan, a Organization and Use long-range plan to guide transportation facilities and services in the Town of Vienna. The plan The Transportation Plan describes the existing meets state and regional planning requirements facilities, usage, and trends of each major piece and addresses local transportation needs for of transportation in the Town of Vienna, listed street, transit, freight, bicycle, and pedestrian alphabetically: improvements (commonly referred to as a “multi-modal transportation system”). • Bicycle Mobility • Demand and System Management The plan provides transportation choices for • Parking and Curbside Management residents, employees, visitors, and firms doing • Pedestrian Mobility business in Vienna, with a balanced multi-modal • Streets transportation system to support neighborhood • Transit livability and economic development. The Transportation Plan is a living document, Together, these pieces define the Town’s recognizing that implementation must remain transportation system for all modes. Within flexible to changing conditions and priorities. each there are identified objectives with specific It should be reviewed and updated on an as- supporting policies and indicators to measure needed basis. the level of success of the policies. 60 Transportation Transportation Network The Town’s transportation network is generally defined by the single major commercial corridor (Maple Avenue), several arterial streets and an interconnected residential road network.
    [Show full text]
  • Snickers Gap, Loudoun County, Virginia Introduction: Snickers Gap
    Snickers Gap, Loudoun County, Virginia Introduction: Snickers Gap, originally Williams Gap, is a wind gap in the Blue Ridge Mount on the border of Loudoun County and Clark County in Virginia. The gap is traversed by Virginia State Route 7. The Appalachian Trail also passes across the gap. Bear’s Den and Raven Rocks are adjacent to the gap. Geography: At 1,056 feet (322 m) the gap is approximately 300 to 600 feet (91 to 183 m) below the adjacent ridge line and 400 to 600 feet (120 to 180 m) above the surrounding countryside. Due to the dwindling height of the Blue Ridge as it approaches the Potomac River, Snickers Gap is one of the lowest wind gaps of the ridge in Virginia, with only Manassas Gap and the adjacent Keyes Gap being lower. The gap connects the northern Virginia piedmont with the lower Shenandoah Valley and serves as a main thoroughfare between the two regions. History: The gap has been a major thoroughfare since before the European colonization of the area. Native Americans originally cut a trail through the gap that continued to be used by settlers. The gap was known as Williams’ Gap until the early 1780’s, when the modern name began to be used. The gap derived its name from Edward Snickers, who owned the gap and surrounding land and operated a ferry across the Shenandoah River on the western side of the gap. But the late 18th century the Snikersville Turnpike and the Snickers Gap Turnpike were completed, and Snickers Gap became the main thoroughfare between Loudoun County and the Shenandoah bypassing Keyes Gap, which to that point had been the preferred route.
    [Show full text]
  • Nehemiah SQUIRES of Preston County His Ancestors & Slbllngs
    .,.e.s \ CCG: ~EFERENCE ONLY 5-r~~·)'> Nehemiah SQUIRES of Preston County His Ancestors & Siblings By Joy L. GILCHRIST-STALNAKER NEHEMIAH SQUIRES was b. ca 1769, probably In Shelbourne Parish, Loudoun County, VA; d. 1827; m. Sarah POLAND (POLEN/POLING). Nehemiah, his brother Reuben, and their sister Elizabeth appear to be the only children of Thomes SQUIRES who mlgra1Bd to Monongalia County. Reuben settled In present-day Marlon County, and Nehemiah In present-day Preston County. The whereabouts of EHzabeth Is unknown. The flrst SQUIRE(s)/SQUIERa In Preston County were MEEKER and Wllllam, sons of Benjamin SQUIER, Westfleld, New Jersey. Their signatures are on the petition dated October 1795 which was presented kl the Virginia Assembly requesting separation of Preston County from Monongalia County.1 Wllllam and MEEKER lived on Sandy Creek In present Grant District of Preston Co., near the MORTONs and GRIBBLEa. (DB OS 41211) Around 1800 both families departed the county. MEEKER apparentty went to the Blue Ball county of Ohio (now Warren and Butler counties), and WIHiam went to Fayette Co., PA before joining his brothera In Ohio. The MORTONa appear to be the only ones who remained in Monongalia County.2 Intensive research Indicates there was no family connection between MEEKER and Wllllam and Nehemiah SQUIRES of Preston County. MEEKER SQUIRE(s)/SQUIER (24 Nov 1750INJ-21 Jun 1818/Butler Go., OH) m. Rechel llEEKER (1754-1840), dlUghler of Stephen MEEKER, 9NOV'1n41Essex Co., N.J. Eight chiklmn: Reb8ccs m. (1) Thomas MORTON, son of Samuel MORTON of Monongalia (now Preston) Co., VA, snd (2) Samuel Sergeant.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting, August 20, 2013 Work Session, and August 27, 2013 Work Session
    WINCHESTER COMMON COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 AGENDA 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL MOMENT OF SILENCE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES – August 13, 2013 Regular Meeting, August 20, 2013 Work Session, and August 27, 2013 Work Session REPORT OF THE MAYOR REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER REPORT OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 1.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.1 CU-13-372: Conditional Use Permit – Request of Morris & Ritchie Associates on behalf of the City of Winchester for a conditional use permit to construct a telecommunications tower at 700 Jefferson Street (Map Number 190-01-3) zoned Education, Institution and Public Use (EIP) District. (REQUIRES ROLL-CALL VOTE)(pages 4-54) 1.2 O-2013-25: Second Reading – AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE 8.523 ACRES OF LAND AT 1900 VALLEY AVENUE, 211 AND 301 WEST JUBAL EARLY DRIVE FROM LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (M-1), HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HR), AND HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (B-2) DISTRICTS TO B-2 DISTRICT WITH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OVERLAY RZ-13-196 (Proposed Jubal Square Development Plan) (REQUIRES ROLL-CALL VOTE)(pages 55-87) 1.3 CU-13-422: Conditional Use Permit – Request of Daniel T. Knight, Jr. for a conditional use permit for motor vehicle painting, upholstering, and body and fender work at 427 North Cameron Street (Map Number 173-01-K-1) zoned Commercial Industrial (CM-1) District. (REQUIRES ROLL-CALL VOTE)(pages 88-92) 1.4 O-2013-22: Second Reading – AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND RE- ADOPT SECTION 10-51 OF THE CITY CODE TO INCLUDE AN EXCEPTION FOR BLASTING OPERATIONS RELATED TO CEMETERY BURIAL OF DECEASED HUMAN REMAINS (Reduction
    [Show full text]
  • COLUMBIA PIKE TRANSIT INITIATIVE Alternatives Analysis/Environmental Assessment Volume I May 2012 Abstract Comment Submission Your Comments Are Important
    COLUMBIA PIKE TRANSIT INITIATIVE Alternatives Analysis/Environmental Assessment Volume I May 2012 Abstract Comment Submission Your comments are important. If you cannot attend one of the public meetings, you can submit your comments on the AA/EA between May 22, Arlington County and Fairfax County, Virginia, in cooperation with the Federal 2012, and June 21, 2012, to the following address: Columbia Pike Transit Transit Administration (FTA), are proposing to implement high-quality, high- Initiative, P.O. Box 3915, Oakton, VA 22124, or by email to capacity transit service along a 5-mile corridor, running mainly along Columbia [email protected]. The project website, www.piketransit.com, also Pike, between the Pentagon/Pentagon City area in Arlington County and the provides an on-line comment form to submit comments. To ensure that Skyline complex located in the Baileys Crossroads Community Business Center comments will be considered, the Columbia Pike Transit Initiative must (CBC) in Fairfax County. The proposed project, known as the Columbia Pike receive written comments by June 21, 2012. Transit Initiative, supports the transportation goals of the counties and fosters their vision for a multimodal corridor, linking its walkable, mixed-use, mixed- Next Steps income neighborhoods and connecting these to the Washington, DC area transit network, and thus, the region’s major activity centers. After the public meetings and the close of the comment period, the Arlington County Board and Fairfax County Board of Supervisors will select a Locally The project is seeking federal funding for a portion of the proposed Preferred Alternative (LPA). Thereafter, FTA will review the findings of the improvements through the FTA Capital Investment Grant Program (49 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Colvin Run Mill Furnishing Plan
    Colvin Run Mill Furnishing Plan Colvin Run Mill Historic Site Great Falls, Virginia Fairfax County Park Authority November 2007 Colvin Run Mill Historic Site Colvin Run Mill Furnishing Plan by Dawn Kehrer A publication of Fairfax County, Virginia November 2007 Acknowledgements My deep appreciation goes to many members of the Fairfax County Park Authority who helped me research, organize and write this plan. Jeanne Niccolls, Collections Manager, provided guidance and encouragement and edited the manuscript; Ann Korzeniewski, Assistant Site Administrator, Colvin Run Mill, offered help in writing, editing and typing the manuscript on an almost daily basis; Mason Maddox, miller at Colvin Run, helped provide accurate information about milling operations and mill furnishings; Daphne Hutchinson, Branch Manager, Production Services, edited the manuscript, and Jennifer Blackwood and Crystal Allison, Colvin Run Mill, helped with graphics. Other Park Authority members offered valuable information about the history and architecture of the mill including Michael Rierson, Support Service Manager; Mike Henry, Colvin Run Mill Site Administrator; Mary Allen, Volunteer Coordinator, Colvin Run Mill; and Jack Van De Reit, Restoration Specialist. Barb Ziman, Events Coordinator, Sully Historic Site, offered information about period clothing for the miller. Joanne Kearney, Graphic Designer, Production Services, gave me helpful information about graphics and Don Sweeney, Photographer, Production Services, captured the mill in his magnificent photography. Also thanks to Judith Pedersen, Public Information Officer, Matthew Kaiser, Deputy Public Information Officer, and David Ochs, Resources Editor, Fairfax County Park Authority, who reviewed the manuscript. Several Colvin Run Mill volunteers also helped me with various aspects of the paper and have my gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Years Ago in the Third Infantry November 1862 November 1, 1862
    150 Years Ago in the Third Infantry Compiled by Greg Kostka Edited by Darrell Cochran November 1862 November 1, 1862 The Third Infantry and the rest of Sykes' division of the Fifth Corps leave Pleasant Valley, Maryland, and cross the Potomac River. Their destination is Snickers Gap in the Blue Ridge Mountains, through which Virginia State Route 7 now passes. Sykes' division arrives in the vicinity of Snickers Gap during the evening of November 2 and the early hours of November 3. The division supports a cavalry reconnaissance into the Shenandoah Valley beyond and is intended to prevent the enemy from using the pass to attack the near of the Army of the Potomac as it advances along the east front of the Blue Ridge. (Regt Return) November 3, 1862 As the First Brigade of Sykes' division, including the Third Infantry, is being posted on the mountain at Snickers Gap, Captain Thomas Walker of Company I reports to the brigade commander, Lieutenant Colonel Robert Buchanan, that he is sick and receives permission to stay in the rear with the ambulances. General Sykes is present when this exchange takes place. Captain Walker has been listed on the regimental returns of the Third Infantry for each of the months of July through October 1862 as "present sick". He has been suffering from chronic neuralgia (a nerve pain disorder) and rheumatism, and also suffered a sprained ankle recently. Several days later, on the evening before the division withdraws from the gap, Sykes orders the "ambulances down the hill preparatory to the troops moving in the morning." He sees Captain Walker join the ambulances and presumes he is still listed on the sick report.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2012 Vienna/Tysons Corner Russian Kettlebell Challenge Certification Hotel, Training and Travel Information
    May 2012 Vienna/Tysons Corner Russian Kettlebell Challenge Certification Hotel, Training and Travel Information Thank you for registering for the Russian Kettlebell Challenge Certification. Below you will find information on the seminar hotel (this is the only hotel we are recommending for attendees), the training facility and travel information. ______________________________________ RKC Certification Hotel (Special rate secured) We have secured a special group rate of $99 per night for single or double rooms (not including state and local taxes or resort charges). These rates are available three days pre- and post-event, based on availability (event dates cover May 17-19). When booking reservation at this hotel, be sure to mention that you are making your reservation for DRAGON DOOR PUBLICATIONS event to receive our SPECIAL RATE. RESERVATIONS MUST BE MADE NO LATER THAN APRIL 14TH However, DO NOT WAIT, make your reservation IMMEDIATELY. Our room block is limited, so make sure that you are part of our group block in order to get this fantastic savings. SHERATON PREMIERE AT TYSONS CORNER $99 plus tax for single or double rooms, plus applicable state and local taxes and resort charges per night. 8661 LEESBURG PIKE VIENNA, VIRGINIA 22182 Phone: 703-448-1234 Online Reservations: https://www.starwoodmeeting.com/StarGroupsWeb/booking/reservation?id=1203078084&key=557CD Hotel Website: http://www.sheratontysonscorner.com/ Phone reservations: Call 703-448-1234 and and make sure that you give them our Group Name (DRAGON DOOR PUBLICATIONS or RUSSIAN KETTLEBELL CHALLENGE) to receive our special workshop rate. About the Hotel: Sheraton Premiere at Tysons Corner is an upscale hotel located just 10 minutes from Dulles Airport and just 20 minutes outside downtown Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Docket 2 19 2020
    Transportation Commission February 19, 2020 7:00 PM City Council Workroom (City Hall, 2nd Floor) AGENDA 1. Public Comment Period (not to exceed 15 min) 2. Minutes of the January 15, 2020 Meeting 3. Commission Updates 4. INFORMATION ITEM: High Capacity Transit Corridors Update 5. ACTION ITEM: Proposed Applications for Commonwealth Smart Scale Program 6. ACTION ITEM: Proposed Application to the Transportation-Land Use Connections Program 7. INFORMATIONAL ITEM: Calendar Year 2020 Work Plan 8. Updates to Receive (Consent) A. WMATA Budget B. Legislative Update 9. Other business Public hearing items are so noted on the agenda. The Commission may receive public comments on other agenda items at its discretion. When there is no public hearing, the Commission encourages written comments on agenda items be sent to [email protected] in advance of or after the meeting. Next Meeting: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 at 7:00 PM in City Council Workroom (City Hall, 2nd Floor). The City of Alexandria complies with the terms of ADA. An individual with a disability who wishes to request an accommodation may contact the Department of Transportation and Environmental Services at 703-746-4086 or TTY/TTD 703-838-5056. City of Alexandria Transportation Commission Regular Meeting January 15, 2020 7:00 p.m. Council Workroom MINUTES Commissioners Present: Vice-Chair Melissa McMahon, Commissioner Bruce Marsh, Commissioner Casey Kane, Commissioner John Goebel, Commissioner Carolyn Schroeder, Commissioner Jakubek, Commissioner Alyia Gaskins. Staff Present: Yon Lambert – Director, Transportation Environmental Services, Hillary Orr – Deputy Director, Transportation, Christopher Ziemann - Transportation Planning Division Chief, Jennifer Slesinger - Transportation Planning Division, Sharese Thomas - Transportation Planning Division, Jose Ayala – Department of Planning & Zoning.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiting Magazine Vol 9 No 5
    The Journal of the American Kitefli rs Association AKA American Kitefliers Association 1987 Officers and Executive Committee Regional Directors President Corresponding Secretary Region 1: New England Region 7: Northwest Central Robert Price Jewell Price CT, NH. MA,ME, RI, VT lA, IL, MN, WI 3839 Dustin Road 3839 Dustin Road Carl Poehler AI Hargus. III Burtonsville, MD 20866 Burtonsville, MD 20866 9 Vine Street 4705 W. Byron 301/421-9620 301/421-9620 Melrose, MA 02176 Chicago, IL 60641 617/662-6999 312/545-9572 First Vice President Recording Secretary W.D. (Red) Braswell Wendy Norwitz Region 2: New York State Region 8: Mountain 10000 Lomond Drive 13785 Brighton Dam Road Jerry Gorsuch AZ, CO, /D, MT,N D , NE, Ntv Manassas, VA 22110 Clarksville, MD 21029 380 Grimsby Street NV, SD, UT, WY 703/36] -2671 301/854-0132 Staten Island. NY 0306 Brian Volkman 718/351-7461 Second Vice President Treasurer The Kite Store 1415 Larimer Square Bill Goodwin Bill Bigge Region 3: Penn-Jersey Denver, CO 80202 4500 Renn Street 13020 Well House Court NJ, PA 303/477-9549 Rockville, MD 20853 Germantown, MD 20874 301/460-7299 301/972-1051 Scott Spencer 3601 Elmertown Avenue Region 9: Southwest Third Vice President Director-a t-Large Harrisburg, PA 17109 AR, KS, MO, OK, 1X Wood Ellis Margo Brown 717/652-8470 Michael G. Freeman 6212 N. 18th Road 6636 Kirkley Avenue PO Box 12039 Region 4: Mid-Atlantic Arlington, VA 22205 McLean, VA 22101 Wichita, KS 67277 DC, DE, MD, WV 703/241-4066 703/893-3886 VA, 316/721 �3848 Pete Ianuzzi 1908 Old Frederick Road Past Presidents Baltimore.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia State Route 7 Video Detection System Performance Assessment
    Virginia State Route 7 Video Detection System Performance Assessment Prepared for: Honorable Congressman Frank Wolf Prepared by: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration February 3, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. BACKGROUND 2 System Description 2 Local Signal Description 3 Detector Subsystem 3 Video Imaging Detection System (VIDS) 4 3. STUDY METHODOLOGY, VIDS DESIGN AND INSTALLATION 6 VIDS Design and Methodology 7 4. ISSUES, RAMIFICATIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS 8 5. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS 12 6. LIST OF REFERNECES 13 7. APPENDIX A 14 i 1. INTRODUCTION The Honorable Congressman Frank Wolf, in his letter dated November 7, 2005 to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), requested an analysis of traffic operational issues along Route 7 in the Northern Virginia area, particularly those associated with video based traffic detectors. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) had installed video based traffic detectors along Route 7 and the performance of the detectors was found to be unacceptable. VDOT engineered and contracted to have video imaging detector system (VIDS) devices installed along Route 7. The system, however, experienced significant detection errors and VDOT decided to discontinue its use. The principal concerns were missed vehicle detections for the left turn movements off Route 7 and significant over counts as well as missed detections for the side street movements. VDOT has reverted back to the inductive loop detectors that were in place prior to the installation of VIDS. Figure 1: STUDY SITE ALONG ROUTE 7 1 2. BACKGROUND The study area is approximately 21 miles long (Figure 1). The land use along Route 7 is strip shopping malls east of the Dulles Toll Road, which changes to residential, then back to strip shopping malls in the Sterling area.
    [Show full text]
  • Loudoun County, Virginia Historic Resource Survey
    LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY SURVEY REPORT Prepared for: Loudoun County Department of Planning Community Planning Division 1 Harrison Street, SE, 3sdFloor Leesburg, VA 20177-7000 Telephone (703) 777-0246 October 2003 Prepared by: Mark R. Edwards, Principal Investigator Jeffrey Durbin, Senior Architectural Historian Amy Barnes, Architectural Historian Caleb Christopher, Architectural Historian Shelby Spillers, Architectural Historian Heather Yost, Architectural Historian URS Corporation National Capital Area Cultural Resources Group 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 (301) 258-9780 Loudoun County, Virginia Historic Resource Survey Survey Report October 2003 Prepared by: Mark R. Edwards, Principal Investigator Jeffrey Durbin, Senior Architectural Historian Amy Barnes, Architectural Historian Caleb Christopher, Architectural Historian Shelby Spillers, Architectural Historian Heather Yost, Architectural Historian URS Corporation National Capital Area Cultural Resources Group 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 10 1 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 (301) 258-9780 Prepared for Loudoun County Department of Planning Community Planning Division 1 Harrison Street, SE, 3sdFloor Leesburg, VA 20177-7000 Telephone (703) 777-0246 In January 2003, the Loudoun County Department of Planning contracted with URS Corporation (URS) to prepare a historic context for the County and to conduct a survey of 750 representative historic resource types across Loudoun County that best illustrate the history of the County, especially in those areas and themes underrepresented in previous survey efforts. The purpose of this project was to collect information on historic resources from across the County, with the survey results from this project serving as a component of the Preservation Plan for the County developed by the Loudoun County Department of Planning.
    [Show full text]