DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C-2 PRELIMINARY FINAL SECTION 106 HISTORIC RESOURCES EFFECTS DOCUMENT Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C-2 PRELIMINARY FINAL SECTION 106 HISTORIC RESOURCES EFFECTS DOCUMENT Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Appendix C-2 PRELIMINARY FINAL SECTION 106 HISTORIC RESOURCES EFFECTS DOCUMENT Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Preliminary Final Historic Resources Survey & Effects Assessment for New Runways, Terminal Facilities and Related Facilities at Washington Dulles International Airport Washington Dulles International Airport Dulles, Virginia August 2005 For further information: Mr. Joseph Delia Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington Airports District Office 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210 Dulles, VA 20166 703.661.1358 ABSTRACT URS Group, Inc. (URS) of Gaithersburg, Maryland conducted a historic resource survey of above-ground resources within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) of the proposed runway expansion project at Dulles International Airport (Dulles) between February and March 2003 and between April and June 2004. These resources are located within the APE of the proposed runway and airport expansion alternatives at Dulles as detailed in URS correspondence sent to the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR), dated February 26, 2003. The APE includes both the area directly impacted by construction activities and the area indirectly impacted by an increase to the existing decibel levels. Dulles is located on the border of eastern Loudoun and western Fairfax Counties, Virginia and is bordered by State Route 267 to the northeast, State Route 28 to the east, U.S. Route 50 and a series of industrial and business parks to the south, and State Route 606 to the west. Two additional runways and associated improvements are needed to enable Dulles to provide adequate airside capacity to accommodate future aviation activity levels with acceptable operational delay. The proposed development would involve construction of one runway parallel to existing Runway 1L/19R and one runway parallel to Runway 12R/30L. The project would also include the construction of taxiways, a new Tier 3 Concourse, and other associated support facilities such as lighting systems and navigational aids. Three alternatives, No Action, Build Alternative 3, and Build Alternative 4 are being considered. Because the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes to fund this project, the airport expansion is subject to review pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR Part 800, “Protection of Historic Properties.” This survey report is also in support of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) as mandated under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which will provide the FAA with a comprehensive review of the environmental impacts associated with multiple design alternatives. Ten architectural resources (buildings, structures, objects, and/or complexes) were identified within the APE for the proposed Dulles runway alternatives and surveyed at the reconnaissance- level. One resource, Dulles Airport Historic District (053-0008) has previously been determined eligible for listing in the National Register; and one resource, Sully Plantation (029-0037), is listed in the National Register. The FAA and MWAA have determined that the remaining eight historic resources are not eligible for listing in the NRHP and have received concurrence on seven of these resources from the SHPO in their July 1, 2005 letter to the FAA. The McCulloch Farm Ruins (VDHT # 053-5264 and 44LD543) was determined to be ineligible for listing in the National Register under Criteria A, B, or C by the SHPO in October 2004. Phase II evaluation of the site, which was completed in July 2005, determined that the site is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion D. Concurrence with FAA and MWAA’s determination is pending. Table 1 provides a summary of each property’s National Register status and the adverse effects, if applicable, to that resource from each of the three alternatives under consideration. i ABSTRACT The APE has been altered from the September 2004 Draft Section 106 Report, leading to the removal of four historic properties from consultation, as NOAA/NWS is conducting their own environmental review for the relocation of their facilities, including NEPA and Section 106 consultation. The four properties which were removed from the report are: • 053-5253 • 053-5254 • 053-5255 • 053-5256 A total of 53 archaeological sites were identified within the APE for the proposed Dulles runway alternatives. Phase I survey for the entire Dulles facility was completed in 2004. SHPO concurrence with the Phase I findings was received in November 2004. Phase II evaluations were recommended for 14 sites to determine if they are eligible for inclusion in the National Register and were completed in July 2005. One archaeological site (44FX2840) has been determined to be eligible for listing in the National Register and concurrence received from the SHPO. An additional three sites (44LD538; 44LD539; and 44LD1042) have been determined to be eligible for listing in the National Register by the FAA and MWAA and consultation for these sites is ongoing. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is currently being developed between these parties to address the completion of the archaeological investigations. A copy of the draft MOA is included in Appendix A of this report. The No Action alternative would have no effect on historic resources. No historic properties would be affected by this action as there would be no construction, demolition, or changes to the existing decibel levels. Both Build Alternative 3 and Build Alternative 4 would have an impact on historic resources. Sully Plantation (VDHR #029-0037) would not experience an adverse effect due to either of these build alternatives. Noise modeling indicates that the aircraft-related noise level at this historic resource would either remain the same, or experience an estimated 1 dBA decrease. Preliminary analysis suggests that there would be no adverse effect to the Dulles Airport Historic District (VDHR #053-0008) due to Build Alternative 3 and Build Alternative 4. The construction of two new runways would have no adverse effect on the Dulles Airport Historic District (VDHR #053-0008). However, FAA considers the proposed Tier 3 Concourse Improvements and associated utility improvements, as well as other associated actions within or proximate to the District, to be a connected action in support of the build alternatives. Formal Section 106 consultation for the Dulles Airport Historic District (VDHR #053-0008) regarding the level of effect, if any, will be postponed by FAA until more detailed information regarding the proposed Tier 3 Concourse Improvements, and associated construction, is developed. This approach is consistent with a phased identification and evaluation of historic resources, as described in 36 CFR 800(4)(b)(2). FAA and MWAA have determined that four archaeological sites eligible for listing in the National Register will be adversely affected by Build Alternative 3 and Build Alternative 4. For each of these sites, Phase III Data Recovery or In-Situ Preservation will be undertaken in accordance with stipulations outlined in the MOA. ii ABSTRACT Table 1: Summary of Structures Survey Results Build Build VDHR Property NR Eligible? No Action Name Alternative Alternative Inventory # Type (Criteria) Alternative 3 4 No adverse No adverse 029-0037 Sully Plantation Farmstead Listed (B, C) No effect effect effect No adverse No adverse effect; based effect; based on on 053-0008 Dulles Airport Historic District Airport Yes (A ,C) No effect information information currently currently available available Landscape 029-5274 Manassas Gap Rail Bed No N/A N/A N/A Feature 053-5252 Farmstead Farmstead No N/A N/A N/A Building 14- National Weather 053-5257 Laboratory No N/A N/A N/A Service, Sterling Facility Building 16- National Weather 053-5258 Laboratory No N/A N/A N/A Service, Sterling Facility Interservice Radio Laboratory 053-5261 Propagation Laboratory No N/A N/A N/A Complex Complex 053-5263 Moran House House No N/A N/A N/A No adverse No adverse effect; based effect; based No (Criterion D on on 053-5264 McCulloch Farm Ruins Ruins N/A Pending) information information currently currently available available House at 44210 Beaver 053-5266 Ruins No N/A N/A N/A Meadow Road Ruins iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Section 1 Introduction....................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Location....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Description of Undertaking......................................................................1-1 1.2.1 Direct Actions:............................................................................. 1-2 1.2.2 Connected Actions:...................................................................... 1-4 1.2.3 Cumulative Actions:.................................................................... 1-5 1.3 Area of Potential Effects.......................................................................... 1-6 1.3.1 Determination of the Area of Potential Effects............................ 1-6 1.3.2 Proposed APE.............................................................................. 1-7 1.3.3 Assessment of Adverse Effects.................................................... 1-7 1.3.4 Direct Effects............................................................................... 1-8 1.3.5 Noise Effects...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5 Transportation
    Chapter 5 Transportation Goals • Provide for efficient and reliable movement for all transportation modes • Manage the impact of regional and local traffic on residential neighborhoods • Maximize safety and dependability • Encourage people to walk and bicycle • Reduce congestion for environmental benefits • Manage the effects of regional development and travel trends Town of Vienna comprehensive plan Introduction This chapter describes the Transportation Plan, a Organization and Use long-range plan to guide transportation facilities and services in the Town of Vienna. The plan The Transportation Plan describes the existing meets state and regional planning requirements facilities, usage, and trends of each major piece and addresses local transportation needs for of transportation in the Town of Vienna, listed street, transit, freight, bicycle, and pedestrian alphabetically: improvements (commonly referred to as a “multi-modal transportation system”). • Bicycle Mobility • Demand and System Management The plan provides transportation choices for • Parking and Curbside Management residents, employees, visitors, and firms doing • Pedestrian Mobility business in Vienna, with a balanced multi-modal • Streets transportation system to support neighborhood • Transit livability and economic development. The Transportation Plan is a living document, Together, these pieces define the Town’s recognizing that implementation must remain transportation system for all modes. Within flexible to changing conditions and priorities. each there are identified objectives with specific It should be reviewed and updated on an as- supporting policies and indicators to measure needed basis. the level of success of the policies. 60 Transportation Transportation Network The Town’s transportation network is generally defined by the single major commercial corridor (Maple Avenue), several arterial streets and an interconnected residential road network.
    [Show full text]
  • Snickers Gap, Loudoun County, Virginia Introduction: Snickers Gap
    Snickers Gap, Loudoun County, Virginia Introduction: Snickers Gap, originally Williams Gap, is a wind gap in the Blue Ridge Mount on the border of Loudoun County and Clark County in Virginia. The gap is traversed by Virginia State Route 7. The Appalachian Trail also passes across the gap. Bear’s Den and Raven Rocks are adjacent to the gap. Geography: At 1,056 feet (322 m) the gap is approximately 300 to 600 feet (91 to 183 m) below the adjacent ridge line and 400 to 600 feet (120 to 180 m) above the surrounding countryside. Due to the dwindling height of the Blue Ridge as it approaches the Potomac River, Snickers Gap is one of the lowest wind gaps of the ridge in Virginia, with only Manassas Gap and the adjacent Keyes Gap being lower. The gap connects the northern Virginia piedmont with the lower Shenandoah Valley and serves as a main thoroughfare between the two regions. History: The gap has been a major thoroughfare since before the European colonization of the area. Native Americans originally cut a trail through the gap that continued to be used by settlers. The gap was known as Williams’ Gap until the early 1780’s, when the modern name began to be used. The gap derived its name from Edward Snickers, who owned the gap and surrounding land and operated a ferry across the Shenandoah River on the western side of the gap. But the late 18th century the Snikersville Turnpike and the Snickers Gap Turnpike were completed, and Snickers Gap became the main thoroughfare between Loudoun County and the Shenandoah bypassing Keyes Gap, which to that point had been the preferred route.
    [Show full text]
  • Nehemiah SQUIRES of Preston County His Ancestors & Slbllngs
    .,.e.s \ CCG: ~EFERENCE ONLY 5-r~~·)'> Nehemiah SQUIRES of Preston County His Ancestors & Siblings By Joy L. GILCHRIST-STALNAKER NEHEMIAH SQUIRES was b. ca 1769, probably In Shelbourne Parish, Loudoun County, VA; d. 1827; m. Sarah POLAND (POLEN/POLING). Nehemiah, his brother Reuben, and their sister Elizabeth appear to be the only children of Thomes SQUIRES who mlgra1Bd to Monongalia County. Reuben settled In present-day Marlon County, and Nehemiah In present-day Preston County. The whereabouts of EHzabeth Is unknown. The flrst SQUIRE(s)/SQUIERa In Preston County were MEEKER and Wllllam, sons of Benjamin SQUIER, Westfleld, New Jersey. Their signatures are on the petition dated October 1795 which was presented kl the Virginia Assembly requesting separation of Preston County from Monongalia County.1 Wllllam and MEEKER lived on Sandy Creek In present Grant District of Preston Co., near the MORTONs and GRIBBLEa. (DB OS 41211) Around 1800 both families departed the county. MEEKER apparentty went to the Blue Ball county of Ohio (now Warren and Butler counties), and WIHiam went to Fayette Co., PA before joining his brothera In Ohio. The MORTONa appear to be the only ones who remained in Monongalia County.2 Intensive research Indicates there was no family connection between MEEKER and Wllllam and Nehemiah SQUIRES of Preston County. MEEKER SQUIRE(s)/SQUIER (24 Nov 1750INJ-21 Jun 1818/Butler Go., OH) m. Rechel llEEKER (1754-1840), dlUghler of Stephen MEEKER, 9NOV'1n41Essex Co., N.J. Eight chiklmn: Reb8ccs m. (1) Thomas MORTON, son of Samuel MORTON of Monongalia (now Preston) Co., VA, snd (2) Samuel Sergeant.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting, August 20, 2013 Work Session, and August 27, 2013 Work Session
    WINCHESTER COMMON COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 AGENDA 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL MOMENT OF SILENCE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES – August 13, 2013 Regular Meeting, August 20, 2013 Work Session, and August 27, 2013 Work Session REPORT OF THE MAYOR REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER REPORT OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 1.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.1 CU-13-372: Conditional Use Permit – Request of Morris & Ritchie Associates on behalf of the City of Winchester for a conditional use permit to construct a telecommunications tower at 700 Jefferson Street (Map Number 190-01-3) zoned Education, Institution and Public Use (EIP) District. (REQUIRES ROLL-CALL VOTE)(pages 4-54) 1.2 O-2013-25: Second Reading – AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE 8.523 ACRES OF LAND AT 1900 VALLEY AVENUE, 211 AND 301 WEST JUBAL EARLY DRIVE FROM LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (M-1), HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HR), AND HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (B-2) DISTRICTS TO B-2 DISTRICT WITH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OVERLAY RZ-13-196 (Proposed Jubal Square Development Plan) (REQUIRES ROLL-CALL VOTE)(pages 55-87) 1.3 CU-13-422: Conditional Use Permit – Request of Daniel T. Knight, Jr. for a conditional use permit for motor vehicle painting, upholstering, and body and fender work at 427 North Cameron Street (Map Number 173-01-K-1) zoned Commercial Industrial (CM-1) District. (REQUIRES ROLL-CALL VOTE)(pages 88-92) 1.4 O-2013-22: Second Reading – AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND RE- ADOPT SECTION 10-51 OF THE CITY CODE TO INCLUDE AN EXCEPTION FOR BLASTING OPERATIONS RELATED TO CEMETERY BURIAL OF DECEASED HUMAN REMAINS (Reduction
    [Show full text]
  • COLUMBIA PIKE TRANSIT INITIATIVE Alternatives Analysis/Environmental Assessment Volume I May 2012 Abstract Comment Submission Your Comments Are Important
    COLUMBIA PIKE TRANSIT INITIATIVE Alternatives Analysis/Environmental Assessment Volume I May 2012 Abstract Comment Submission Your comments are important. If you cannot attend one of the public meetings, you can submit your comments on the AA/EA between May 22, Arlington County and Fairfax County, Virginia, in cooperation with the Federal 2012, and June 21, 2012, to the following address: Columbia Pike Transit Transit Administration (FTA), are proposing to implement high-quality, high- Initiative, P.O. Box 3915, Oakton, VA 22124, or by email to capacity transit service along a 5-mile corridor, running mainly along Columbia [email protected]. The project website, www.piketransit.com, also Pike, between the Pentagon/Pentagon City area in Arlington County and the provides an on-line comment form to submit comments. To ensure that Skyline complex located in the Baileys Crossroads Community Business Center comments will be considered, the Columbia Pike Transit Initiative must (CBC) in Fairfax County. The proposed project, known as the Columbia Pike receive written comments by June 21, 2012. Transit Initiative, supports the transportation goals of the counties and fosters their vision for a multimodal corridor, linking its walkable, mixed-use, mixed- Next Steps income neighborhoods and connecting these to the Washington, DC area transit network, and thus, the region’s major activity centers. After the public meetings and the close of the comment period, the Arlington County Board and Fairfax County Board of Supervisors will select a Locally The project is seeking federal funding for a portion of the proposed Preferred Alternative (LPA). Thereafter, FTA will review the findings of the improvements through the FTA Capital Investment Grant Program (49 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Colvin Run Mill Furnishing Plan
    Colvin Run Mill Furnishing Plan Colvin Run Mill Historic Site Great Falls, Virginia Fairfax County Park Authority November 2007 Colvin Run Mill Historic Site Colvin Run Mill Furnishing Plan by Dawn Kehrer A publication of Fairfax County, Virginia November 2007 Acknowledgements My deep appreciation goes to many members of the Fairfax County Park Authority who helped me research, organize and write this plan. Jeanne Niccolls, Collections Manager, provided guidance and encouragement and edited the manuscript; Ann Korzeniewski, Assistant Site Administrator, Colvin Run Mill, offered help in writing, editing and typing the manuscript on an almost daily basis; Mason Maddox, miller at Colvin Run, helped provide accurate information about milling operations and mill furnishings; Daphne Hutchinson, Branch Manager, Production Services, edited the manuscript, and Jennifer Blackwood and Crystal Allison, Colvin Run Mill, helped with graphics. Other Park Authority members offered valuable information about the history and architecture of the mill including Michael Rierson, Support Service Manager; Mike Henry, Colvin Run Mill Site Administrator; Mary Allen, Volunteer Coordinator, Colvin Run Mill; and Jack Van De Reit, Restoration Specialist. Barb Ziman, Events Coordinator, Sully Historic Site, offered information about period clothing for the miller. Joanne Kearney, Graphic Designer, Production Services, gave me helpful information about graphics and Don Sweeney, Photographer, Production Services, captured the mill in his magnificent photography. Also thanks to Judith Pedersen, Public Information Officer, Matthew Kaiser, Deputy Public Information Officer, and David Ochs, Resources Editor, Fairfax County Park Authority, who reviewed the manuscript. Several Colvin Run Mill volunteers also helped me with various aspects of the paper and have my gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Years Ago in the Third Infantry November 1862 November 1, 1862
    150 Years Ago in the Third Infantry Compiled by Greg Kostka Edited by Darrell Cochran November 1862 November 1, 1862 The Third Infantry and the rest of Sykes' division of the Fifth Corps leave Pleasant Valley, Maryland, and cross the Potomac River. Their destination is Snickers Gap in the Blue Ridge Mountains, through which Virginia State Route 7 now passes. Sykes' division arrives in the vicinity of Snickers Gap during the evening of November 2 and the early hours of November 3. The division supports a cavalry reconnaissance into the Shenandoah Valley beyond and is intended to prevent the enemy from using the pass to attack the near of the Army of the Potomac as it advances along the east front of the Blue Ridge. (Regt Return) November 3, 1862 As the First Brigade of Sykes' division, including the Third Infantry, is being posted on the mountain at Snickers Gap, Captain Thomas Walker of Company I reports to the brigade commander, Lieutenant Colonel Robert Buchanan, that he is sick and receives permission to stay in the rear with the ambulances. General Sykes is present when this exchange takes place. Captain Walker has been listed on the regimental returns of the Third Infantry for each of the months of July through October 1862 as "present sick". He has been suffering from chronic neuralgia (a nerve pain disorder) and rheumatism, and also suffered a sprained ankle recently. Several days later, on the evening before the division withdraws from the gap, Sykes orders the "ambulances down the hill preparatory to the troops moving in the morning." He sees Captain Walker join the ambulances and presumes he is still listed on the sick report.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2012 Vienna/Tysons Corner Russian Kettlebell Challenge Certification Hotel, Training and Travel Information
    May 2012 Vienna/Tysons Corner Russian Kettlebell Challenge Certification Hotel, Training and Travel Information Thank you for registering for the Russian Kettlebell Challenge Certification. Below you will find information on the seminar hotel (this is the only hotel we are recommending for attendees), the training facility and travel information. ______________________________________ RKC Certification Hotel (Special rate secured) We have secured a special group rate of $99 per night for single or double rooms (not including state and local taxes or resort charges). These rates are available three days pre- and post-event, based on availability (event dates cover May 17-19). When booking reservation at this hotel, be sure to mention that you are making your reservation for DRAGON DOOR PUBLICATIONS event to receive our SPECIAL RATE. RESERVATIONS MUST BE MADE NO LATER THAN APRIL 14TH However, DO NOT WAIT, make your reservation IMMEDIATELY. Our room block is limited, so make sure that you are part of our group block in order to get this fantastic savings. SHERATON PREMIERE AT TYSONS CORNER $99 plus tax for single or double rooms, plus applicable state and local taxes and resort charges per night. 8661 LEESBURG PIKE VIENNA, VIRGINIA 22182 Phone: 703-448-1234 Online Reservations: https://www.starwoodmeeting.com/StarGroupsWeb/booking/reservation?id=1203078084&key=557CD Hotel Website: http://www.sheratontysonscorner.com/ Phone reservations: Call 703-448-1234 and and make sure that you give them our Group Name (DRAGON DOOR PUBLICATIONS or RUSSIAN KETTLEBELL CHALLENGE) to receive our special workshop rate. About the Hotel: Sheraton Premiere at Tysons Corner is an upscale hotel located just 10 minutes from Dulles Airport and just 20 minutes outside downtown Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Docket 2 19 2020
    Transportation Commission February 19, 2020 7:00 PM City Council Workroom (City Hall, 2nd Floor) AGENDA 1. Public Comment Period (not to exceed 15 min) 2. Minutes of the January 15, 2020 Meeting 3. Commission Updates 4. INFORMATION ITEM: High Capacity Transit Corridors Update 5. ACTION ITEM: Proposed Applications for Commonwealth Smart Scale Program 6. ACTION ITEM: Proposed Application to the Transportation-Land Use Connections Program 7. INFORMATIONAL ITEM: Calendar Year 2020 Work Plan 8. Updates to Receive (Consent) A. WMATA Budget B. Legislative Update 9. Other business Public hearing items are so noted on the agenda. The Commission may receive public comments on other agenda items at its discretion. When there is no public hearing, the Commission encourages written comments on agenda items be sent to [email protected] in advance of or after the meeting. Next Meeting: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 at 7:00 PM in City Council Workroom (City Hall, 2nd Floor). The City of Alexandria complies with the terms of ADA. An individual with a disability who wishes to request an accommodation may contact the Department of Transportation and Environmental Services at 703-746-4086 or TTY/TTD 703-838-5056. City of Alexandria Transportation Commission Regular Meeting January 15, 2020 7:00 p.m. Council Workroom MINUTES Commissioners Present: Vice-Chair Melissa McMahon, Commissioner Bruce Marsh, Commissioner Casey Kane, Commissioner John Goebel, Commissioner Carolyn Schroeder, Commissioner Jakubek, Commissioner Alyia Gaskins. Staff Present: Yon Lambert – Director, Transportation Environmental Services, Hillary Orr – Deputy Director, Transportation, Christopher Ziemann - Transportation Planning Division Chief, Jennifer Slesinger - Transportation Planning Division, Sharese Thomas - Transportation Planning Division, Jose Ayala – Department of Planning & Zoning.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiting Magazine Vol 9 No 5
    The Journal of the American Kitefli rs Association AKA American Kitefliers Association 1987 Officers and Executive Committee Regional Directors President Corresponding Secretary Region 1: New England Region 7: Northwest Central Robert Price Jewell Price CT, NH. MA,ME, RI, VT lA, IL, MN, WI 3839 Dustin Road 3839 Dustin Road Carl Poehler AI Hargus. III Burtonsville, MD 20866 Burtonsville, MD 20866 9 Vine Street 4705 W. Byron 301/421-9620 301/421-9620 Melrose, MA 02176 Chicago, IL 60641 617/662-6999 312/545-9572 First Vice President Recording Secretary W.D. (Red) Braswell Wendy Norwitz Region 2: New York State Region 8: Mountain 10000 Lomond Drive 13785 Brighton Dam Road Jerry Gorsuch AZ, CO, /D, MT,N D , NE, Ntv Manassas, VA 22110 Clarksville, MD 21029 380 Grimsby Street NV, SD, UT, WY 703/36] -2671 301/854-0132 Staten Island. NY 0306 Brian Volkman 718/351-7461 Second Vice President Treasurer The Kite Store 1415 Larimer Square Bill Goodwin Bill Bigge Region 3: Penn-Jersey Denver, CO 80202 4500 Renn Street 13020 Well House Court NJ, PA 303/477-9549 Rockville, MD 20853 Germantown, MD 20874 301/460-7299 301/972-1051 Scott Spencer 3601 Elmertown Avenue Region 9: Southwest Third Vice President Director-a t-Large Harrisburg, PA 17109 AR, KS, MO, OK, 1X Wood Ellis Margo Brown 717/652-8470 Michael G. Freeman 6212 N. 18th Road 6636 Kirkley Avenue PO Box 12039 Region 4: Mid-Atlantic Arlington, VA 22205 McLean, VA 22101 Wichita, KS 67277 DC, DE, MD, WV 703/241-4066 703/893-3886 VA, 316/721 �3848 Pete Ianuzzi 1908 Old Frederick Road Past Presidents Baltimore.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia State Route 7 Video Detection System Performance Assessment
    Virginia State Route 7 Video Detection System Performance Assessment Prepared for: Honorable Congressman Frank Wolf Prepared by: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration February 3, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. BACKGROUND 2 System Description 2 Local Signal Description 3 Detector Subsystem 3 Video Imaging Detection System (VIDS) 4 3. STUDY METHODOLOGY, VIDS DESIGN AND INSTALLATION 6 VIDS Design and Methodology 7 4. ISSUES, RAMIFICATIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS 8 5. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS 12 6. LIST OF REFERNECES 13 7. APPENDIX A 14 i 1. INTRODUCTION The Honorable Congressman Frank Wolf, in his letter dated November 7, 2005 to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), requested an analysis of traffic operational issues along Route 7 in the Northern Virginia area, particularly those associated with video based traffic detectors. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) had installed video based traffic detectors along Route 7 and the performance of the detectors was found to be unacceptable. VDOT engineered and contracted to have video imaging detector system (VIDS) devices installed along Route 7. The system, however, experienced significant detection errors and VDOT decided to discontinue its use. The principal concerns were missed vehicle detections for the left turn movements off Route 7 and significant over counts as well as missed detections for the side street movements. VDOT has reverted back to the inductive loop detectors that were in place prior to the installation of VIDS. Figure 1: STUDY SITE ALONG ROUTE 7 1 2. BACKGROUND The study area is approximately 21 miles long (Figure 1). The land use along Route 7 is strip shopping malls east of the Dulles Toll Road, which changes to residential, then back to strip shopping malls in the Sterling area.
    [Show full text]
  • Loudoun County, Virginia Historic Resource Survey
    LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY SURVEY REPORT Prepared for: Loudoun County Department of Planning Community Planning Division 1 Harrison Street, SE, 3sdFloor Leesburg, VA 20177-7000 Telephone (703) 777-0246 October 2003 Prepared by: Mark R. Edwards, Principal Investigator Jeffrey Durbin, Senior Architectural Historian Amy Barnes, Architectural Historian Caleb Christopher, Architectural Historian Shelby Spillers, Architectural Historian Heather Yost, Architectural Historian URS Corporation National Capital Area Cultural Resources Group 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 (301) 258-9780 Loudoun County, Virginia Historic Resource Survey Survey Report October 2003 Prepared by: Mark R. Edwards, Principal Investigator Jeffrey Durbin, Senior Architectural Historian Amy Barnes, Architectural Historian Caleb Christopher, Architectural Historian Shelby Spillers, Architectural Historian Heather Yost, Architectural Historian URS Corporation National Capital Area Cultural Resources Group 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 10 1 Gaithersburg, MD 20878 (301) 258-9780 Prepared for Loudoun County Department of Planning Community Planning Division 1 Harrison Street, SE, 3sdFloor Leesburg, VA 20177-7000 Telephone (703) 777-0246 In January 2003, the Loudoun County Department of Planning contracted with URS Corporation (URS) to prepare a historic context for the County and to conduct a survey of 750 representative historic resource types across Loudoun County that best illustrate the history of the County, especially in those areas and themes underrepresented in previous survey efforts. The purpose of this project was to collect information on historic resources from across the County, with the survey results from this project serving as a component of the Preservation Plan for the County developed by the Loudoun County Department of Planning.
    [Show full text]