The History of Race Relations in Rhodesia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The History of Race Relations in Rhodesia The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. The History of Race Relations in Rhodesia P. R. Warhurst The modern history of Rhodesia dates from segregationalist government took over in 1962, 1890, with the Occupation of Mashonaland, or the realities of the situation permitted the en- 1887, when the train of events leading to the trenchment of a significant degree of integra- Occupation was set in motion. Contact between tion. White and Black was already well established Chartered rule, during which many basic in the political, economic and social spheres, patterns were to form, began under the aus- and attitudes formulated in the precolonial pices of a concession to Rhodes from Loben- period were to have a strong influence on later gula, King of the Ndebele, who laid claim to developments. But important as the earlier almost the whole of modern Rhodesia. The period undoubtedly was, it lies outside the interaction of the white imperialist and the scope of this paper which is concerned with black traditional ruler was to have an im- modern race relations in the post-1887 era. portant bearing on the subsequent course of Like ancient Gaul, the history of modern events. Lobengula had continued the policy Rhodesia can be divided into three parts; of his father, Mzilikazi, in maintaining the in- Chartered Company rule, which was suc- dependence of his people. The missionary, J. S. ceeded in 1923 by Responsible Government Moffat, once referred to this policy as 'Chinese and the period after 1953 when Southern isolat'on' but Whites were permitted in the Rhodesia was absorbed into the Federation of Kingdom, if only as a means of reducing Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Although conti- possible pressures that would follow total ex- nuity throughout these successive periods is at clusion. Lobengula was well disposed to white least as important as change, they do corres- people provided always that they remained pond to different phases of governmental policy subject to his authority. They enjoyed a privi- towards the Africans. The Chartered era was leged position and in some cases Whites a curious amalgam of integration and segre- became personal friends of the King, but gation, of control and laissez-faire. The fol- woe betide any who flouted his sovereignty, lowing period, under responsible government, as the arrogant negrophobe Frank Johnson dis- saw the introduction of a more rigid policy covered to his cost. Lobengula was still of segregation yet this was also a time of supreme in his own country. African development, especially in the fields In 1887 Lobengula made a treaty with the of health and education. After 1953 integration South African Republic, represented by the became the watchword, and even though a well-known Boer trader, Piet Grobler. The 15 King was strengthening his independence by Ndebele aggression had been improved through securing an alliance with the neighbouring contact with the Portuguese. Having once been Transvaal but Rhodes, who had coveted Mata- dominant in Shona country, the Portuguese beleland for some years, persuaded the High were now returning in some force to substan- Commissioner to take immediate counter- tiate their claims to Mashonaland. In exchange measures to safeguard British interests. The for treaties the Shona eagerly took guns for result was the Moffat Treaty, a treaty of friend- use against the Ndebele imperialists. When the ship between the Ndebele and Britain under British Pioneers arrived, the Shona imagined the terms of which the latter was able to keep that like the Portuguese and traders and hun- out foreign powers. Lobengula was still pla- ters like Selous, they would in due course go gued by a variety of concession-seekers amongst away again. But this time the Whites had come whom Rhodes' group represented the greatest to stay. threat to Ndebele independence. For Rhodes The Pioneers were a very mixed body of wanted more than mineral rights; he intended men. Victor Morier, a corporal in the Police to create a British settlement in the area be- and son of a famous British diplomat, recorded tween the Limpopo and the Zambezi and to cut the range: from an unusually high proportion off the Boers from expansion northwards. To of public school and university men to unem- have disclosed his intentions to Lobengula ployed riff-raff from Johannesburg. Pioneer would have been fatal and they were carefully types are not the sort of people to be gentle disguised in the negotiations for a concession. in their dealings with 'niggers' as Morier re- Rhodes' chief emissary, Rudd, promised that ferred to the Africans. Whether of British or only ten white men would be sent to organize South African birth they looked down on the mining and that they would be subject to the Shona as cowardly, dirty untermenschen. In sovereignty of the Ndebele King. Such 'verbal spite of these harsh attitudes and rough behavi- clauses', however, were not included in the our race relations did not strike the depths written text of the Rudd Concession (1888). usual in frontier situations. With the Pioneers Lobengula had chosen to accept Rhodes' group came a degree of law and order enforced by (which was aided and abetted by imperial offi- the Administration and the British .South Afri- cers) without being aware that he was being ca Company Police. deceived. When he learned that he had been Law and order were applied with a severity tricked, he cancelled the concession. Race rela- that was to become traditional in Rhodesia and tions in modern Rhodesia had opened on a sour in a number of incidents recalcitrant Shona note. were dealt with with undue harshness. Loben- gula protested, not against the harshness, but CHARTERED COMPANY PERIOD against Company interference with his 'dogs'. Rhodes secured a royal charter for his Bri- When Lobengula himself took action against tish South Africa Company which in August- rebellious Shona subjects around Victoria, the September 1890 occupied Mashonaland. If the tiny white community reacted hysterically and Ndebele state was by far the most powerful demanded war. The Company, which had no polity in southern Zambezia, the congeries of more been planning war than had Lobengula, Shona-speaking polities embraced the great changed its policy and drove out the hapless majority of people in the area. The Pioneers King from Bulawayo (1893). occupying Mashonaland saw many villages The Ndebele had lost their prized indepen- perched high on kopjes as a defensive measure dence; the conquerors had become the con- against Ndebele raids and they drew the con- quered. The Whites took over the Ndebele clusion that all the Shona were victims of the heartland, confiscated much cattle and treated Ndebele. While some Shona polities did indeed even the zansi aristocrats with contempt. The suffer the scourge of Ndebele raids, others Shona suffered less but felt particularly aggrie- remained in harmonious relations with their ved since they had never been conquered. warlike neighbours, though usually at a subor- Forced labour was exacted from both Shona dinate level. More distant Shona states had no and Ndebele and the bad race relations that contact with the Ndebele. (East of the Mtilikwe resulted from accumulated grievances led to River the Gaza played a comparable role to the Risings of 1896-7. Although there was a their Ndebele cousins.) Shona defences against limited degree of co-ordination, it seems likely 16 that the Ndebele Rebellion and the Shona farmer. Rising were distinct movements both aimed Politically and socially the Whites entrenched at the restoration of the 'good old days'. In- their power, restrained only by imperial lead- deed a number of Shona polities aligned them- ing strings which were not always held taut. selves according to traditional inter-tribal rival- The constitution was colour-blind (from 1898 ries. While some rose, others co-operated with to 1969) in accordance with imperial practice the Whites and a third group remained neutral. and Rhodes' dictum of 'equal rights for all civi- Tf the Whites had caused the Risings, the lized men'. When asked to define a civilized African dissidents hit back savagely, murder- man Rhodes had given a very wide definition: ing women and children. This in turn provoked 'A man, whether white or black, who had suf- a savage reaction on the part of the Whites, ficient education to write his name, has some who dynamited whole communities out of their property or works. In fact is not a loafer.' But places of refuge. The effect of the Risings was since there were few Blacks with any education traumatic. For the Whites, who had lost no less in Rhodesia at this stage, effective political than ten per cent of their number, a new era power was shared by the Company and the of fear had opened, while fear of the Whites Whites, especially the farming interest. Apart forced the Africans to eschew violence for two from the vote, educated Africans were treated generations. little differently from other Africans. The The sfurtn und drang of the Occupation small group of Mfengu, educated Africans from years was followed by a quarter century of the Cape, were the chief sufferers, and they peaceful Company rule. Sir Robert Tredgold objected to practices like having to raise their has claimed that the reformed system (1898- hats to all Whites and not being allowed to 1923) was the best form of government the walk on the pavements. The Mfengu were Africans have never known in Rhodesia.
Recommended publications
  • 1 the African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, C.1950-53
    ‘It has united us far more closely than any other question would have accomplished’.1 The African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, c.1950-53 The documentary record of African opposition to the C[entral] A[frican] F[ederation] has been the subject renewed historiographical interest in recent years.2 This paper seeks to contribute to the existing debate in three principle ways. Firstly, it will be shown that opposition to the scheme was fatally undermined by the pursuit of two very distinct strands of N[yasaland] A[frican] C[ongress] and A[frican] N[ational] C[ongress] political activism. This dissimilar political discourse produced contradictions that resulted in the bypassing African objections. In the third instance, the paper will go a step further, suggesting that the two respective anti-Federation campaigns not only undermined Congress efforts to stop federation, but laid the path for future discord in the national dispensation then materialising. In 1988, John Darwin wrote that ‘with its telescope clapped firmly to its ear, London declared that [African] opposition [to Federation] could be neither seen nor heard’.3 The well-worn historiographical path points to the fact that African opposition was effectively ignored on the basis that ‘partnership’ between white settlers and black Africans in Northern and Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland offered a strong rationale for the CAF. The requisite benefits arising would see the promotion of African economic opportunities, the placation of settler politicians seeking to reduce the influence of the Colonial Office and the preservation of British influence in the region.4 The utility of ‘partnership’ was in its ambiguity.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Resolution Were Reserved for the Europeans Alone
    United Nations FOURTH COMMITTEE, 1363rd GENERAL MEETING ASSEMBLY Friday, 26 October 1962, at 3,45 p.m. SEVENTEENTH SESSION 0 f/icial Records • NEW YORK CONTENTS failed to appreciate the seriousness of the crisis Page threatening Southern Rhodesia. Agenda item 56: 3. During the forty years which had elapsed since Question of Southern Rhodesia: report of the the first Constitution had been granted to the settlers Special Committee established under Gen­ in 1923, the Government of Southern Rhodesia had eral Assembly resolution 1654 (XVI) (con­ done practically nothing to prepare the people for tinued) self-government. Now a new Constitution was about to General debate (continued). • . 221 be introduced in order to perpetuate white domination for centuries to come. The people of Southern Rho­ Chairman: Mr. Guillermo FLORES AVENDANO desia had shown great tolerance during the longyears of white minority rule, but no self-respecting people (Guatemala). would be content with fifteen seats in the legislatl}re to represent 3 million as against fifty seats for the 250,000 white settlers. Over the years the white In the absence of the Chairman, Mr. Nabavi (Iran), settler Parliament in Southern Rhodesia had enacted Vice-Chairman, took the Chair. many repressive laws which had turned the country into a police State in the heart of the peaceful African continent. The Africans in Southern Rhodesia were AGENDA ITEM 56 subjected to economic exploitation; their wages were Question of Southern Rhodesia: report of the Special Com­ kept below subsistence level and certain positions mittee established under General Assembly resolution were reserved for the Europeans alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ARTICLE A LOOK AT THE REASONS BEHIND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MOVEMENTS AIMED AT RESUSCITATING THE NDEBELE/MTHWAKAZI KINGDOM IN POST-COLONIAL ZIMBABWE Njabulo B. Khumalo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6474-408X National University of Science and Technology, Zimbabwe [email protected] ABSTRACT The resuscitation of the Ndebele kingdom has been a topical issue in Zimbabwe. The Ndebele kingdom, which was established by king Mzilikazi ka MaShobana was destroyed by white settlers during the reign of his son Lobengula. The years following the colonisation of Zimbabwe saw a number of efforts being made to liberate the country. The liberation struggle came to an end in 1980 when Zimbabwe, a country which came to being as a result of nationalists was liberated and the black majority assumed power. However, there have been growing calls for the resuscitation of the Ndebele kingdom, which in some circles mean breaking away from Zimbabwe. One wonders what the reasons behind the call for the resuscitation of the Ndebele kingdom were: Is this move fuelled by poor service delivery in Zimbabwe? Are the Ndebele people unhappy with the current state of affairs in Zimbabwe? Is this another revolution waiting to happen? This study sought to establish the reasons behind calls to resuscitate the Ndebele kingdom in Zimbabwe. A qualitative research methodology was employed and interviews held with one of the heirs to the Ndebele throne, as well as the leader of one of the movements advocating for the resuscitation of the Ndebele or Mthwakazi kingdom. Keywords: kingdom; Lobengula; Mzilikazi; Ndebele; resuscitation; Zimbabwe INTRODUCTION Zimbabwe is a country in southern Africa, which attained its independence in 1980, a period that was followed by a genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesuits, Protestants, and Political Elites in Southern Africa Among the Shona and the Ndebele, 1889–1900
    chapter 5 Soror nostra es: Jesuits, Protestants, and Political Elites in Southern Africa among the Shona and the Ndebele, 1889–1900 Aquinata Agonga Historical archives overflow with nineteenth-century accounts of the heroic incursions of missionaries into the African hinterlands, equipped with mini- mal resources and even less knowledge about their destinations. Tales of young missionaries newly arrived in southern Africa, braving rain, rivers, treacherous paths, diseases, and unknown terrain along the Zambezi to lands lying in the deepest interior of the African continent can be found on shelves in libraries around the world. Along their paths, the missionaries built prayer hamlets that would constitute the foundations of one of the most enduring legacies of this missionary age. Unfortunately for Africa, its missionary fate was largely instigated by West- ern colonialism and its aftermath, born of a series of events that marked the second half of the nineteenth century.1 Europe, experiencing the climax of industrialization, stood in dire need of markets for products and raw materials for production. The reports and narratives of Europeans returning home from short stints as explorers, hunters, traders, and missionaries in Africa about a continent as vast in mass as it was rich in resources fell on eager ears.2 Soon, European powers were stumbling over each other in their scramble for the continent. As political leaders sliced up the continent, European Christian authorities busied themselves with drawing parallel fault-lines along which they would plant the seeds of the Gospel. The battle for a share of the continent and its resources was just as spiri- tual as it was political.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa: Background, May 1977, Part 3
    , , . STATE~iENT OF PRINCIPLES OF U. S. FIRNS WITH AFFILIATES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA . 1. Non-segregation of the races in all eating, comfort, and ,,,ork facili ties. 2. Eoual, and fair .employment practices for all employees. 3. Equal pay for all employees doing equal or comparable work for the same period of t~me. 4 • Initiation of and development of training program~ that will prepare, in substan~ial numbers, blacks and,other non-whites for supervisory, administrative, clerlcal, and t echnical jobs. ~ . 5 . Incr~asing the number of blacks and other non-~lites in manag~ment and supervisory positions. 6. Improving the qualitY ' of employees' lives outside the work cnvi rO])Hl en t in such are as as hOl.S ing, tl'?nsporta U 0] )" school i ng, recreation and health facilities. We :lg 'r- Ct:: to fU 'rther implement these principles . Wh<;!te,J j~P l. (;':.:J:: : 1J~ E . ~.... iol1 requires a modification of existjng' South African . '\mrkir.q . con(iit:Lc:-;s . I we will seek s uch modification throug]l appropriate' ch ~ nnels. , . We be 1 i eve that the implementation of the foregoing pri n::.5.ples . Is t. consistent with respect for human dignity and will con t ribute grea t ly I to the general e~o;)omic vlelfare of all the people of the Republic. of South Afl"ica ~ . ; .' • • . r • •• t ... •..... h • • • • _ .... .t ... ;" ~ . " . , .t· - .- MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT WASHINGTON UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Memo No. 861-77 April 20, 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT THRU: Denis Clift ~ FROM: Jay Katzen ~ SUBJECT: Anatomy of a Rebel, by Peter Joyce Attached, at Tab A, is a synopsis of the subject book, as you requested.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhodesian Crisis in British and International Politics, 1964
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository THE RHODESIAN CRISIS IN BRITISH AND INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 1964-1965 by CARL PETER WATTS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Historical Studies The University of Birmingham April 2006 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis uses evidence from British and international archives to examine the events leading up to Rhodesia’s Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) on 11 November 1965 from the perspectives of Britain, the Old Commonwealth (Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), and the United States. Two underlying themes run throughout the thesis. First, it argues that although the problem of Rhodesian independence was highly complex, a UDI was by no means inevitable. There were courses of action that were dismissed or remained under explored (especially in Britain, but also in the Old Commonwealth, and the United States), which could have been pursued further and may have prevented a UDI.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2013 Rhodesian Services Association Incorporated
    April 2013 A monthly publication for the Rhodesian Services Association Incorporated Registered under the 2005 Charities Act in New Zealand number CC25203 Registered as an Incorporated Society in New Zealand number 2055431 PO Box 13003, Tauranga 3141, New Zealand. Web: www.rhodesianservices.org Secretary’s e-mail [email protected] Editor’s e-mail [email protected] Phone +64 7 576 9500 Fax +64 7 576 9501 To view all previous publications go to our Archives Greetings, The increase in applications to subscribe to this publication is overwhelming – every day we are getting new people on board. Welcome to you all. At the same time there are a number of email addresses which have gone dead. I have had a big purge of these dead addresses and removed them from our address book. It is far too labour intensive to go around chasing people who have changed their addresses. If you know anyone not receiving this publication, please direct them to our web page http://www.rhodesianservices.org/Newsletters.php where they can fill in the online form and get on our mailing list. Please note, this form is for people wanting to register or change address – it is not designed to be used for messages to me. If you want to send me a message, please do it by email. Thank you. Lastly – we require the services of a suitably equipped and capable person who can make up some bracelets from coins that we have. We need to have lugs and fasteners welded onto the coins and then we will arrange electro plating.
    [Show full text]
  • A Crucial Watershed in Southern Rhodesian Politics
    A crucial watershed in Southern Rhodesian politics The 1961 Constitutional Process and the 1962 General Election E v e n t u e Högskolan på Gotlandll fi 2011 VTg ”Kandidatuppsats”u Författare: Jan Olssonr / Avdelningen för Historiab Handledare: Erik Tängerstadil d ( 1 F o r m a t Abstract The thesis examines the political development in Southern Rhodesia 1960-1962 when two processes, the 1961 Constitutional process and the 1962 General Election, had far- reaching consequences for the coming twenty years. It builds on a hypothesis that the Constitutional process led to a radicalisation of all groups, the white minority, the African majority and the colonial power. The main research question is why the ruling party, United Federal Party (UFP) after winning the referendum on a new Constitution with a wide margin could lose the ensuing election one year later to the party, Rhodesian Front (RF) opposing the constitution. The examination is based on material from debates in the Legal Assembly and House of Commons (UK), minutes of meetings, newspaper articles, election material etc. The hypothesis that the Constitutional process led to a radicalization of the main actors was partly confirmed. The process led to a focus on racial issues in the ensuing election. Among the white minority UFP attempted to develop a policy of continued white domination while making constitutional concessions to Africans in order to attract the African middle class. When UFP pressed on with multiracial structural reforms the electorate switched to the racist RF which was considered bearer of the dominant settler ideology. Among the African majority the well educated African middleclass who led the Nationalist movement, changed from multiracial reformists in late 1950‟s to majority rule advocates.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Are the Ndebele and the Kalanga in Zimbabwe?
    Who are the Ndebele and the Kalanga in Zimbabwe? Gerald Chikozho Mazarire Paper Prepared for Konrad Adenuer Foundation Project on ‘Ethnicity in Zimbabwe’ November 2003 Introduction Our understanding of Kalanga and Ndebele identity is tainted by a general legacy of high school textbooks that have confessedly had a tremendous impact on our somewhat obviated knowledge of local ethnicities through a process known in history as ‘feedback’. Under this process printed or published materials find their way back into oral traditions to emerge as common sense historical facts. In reality these common sense views come to shape both history and identity both in the sense of what it is as well as what it ought to be. As the introduction by Terence Ranger demonstrates; this goes together with the calculated construction of identities by the colonial state, which was preoccupied with naming and containing its subjects (itself a legacy on its own). Far from complicating our analysis, these legacies make it all the more interesting for the Ndebele and Kalanga who both provide excellent case studies in identity construction and its imagination. There is also a dimension of academic research, which as Ranger observes, did not focus on ethnicity per-se. This shouldn’t be a hindrance in studying ethnicity though; for we now know a lot more about the Ndebele than we would have some 30years ago (Beach 1973). In contrast, until fairly recently, we did not know as much about the Kalanga who have constantly been treated as a sub-ethnicity of the major groups in southwestern Zimbabwe such as the Ndebele, Tswana and Shona.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe: African Working Class Nationalism, 1957-1963
    The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library. Find more at: http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/africanjournals/ Available through a partnership with Scroll down to read the article. Zambezia (1996), XXIII (ii). ZIMBABWE: AFRICAN WORKING CLASS NATIONALISM, 1957-1963 T. H. MOTHIBE Department of History, National University of Lesotho Abstract Scholars of Zimbabwean history have argued that organised African labour was subordinated to petit bourgeois nationalism. This article refutes these assessments and argues that, in the period between the formation of the first mass nationalist organisation and the adoption of the armed struggle, organised labour and nationalism were intimately connected, a fact that reflected in part the structural position of the African workers in a colonial society. This relationship was, however, disrupted by the adoption of armed struggle by the nationalists in 1963. THE YEAR 1957 marked a very important era in the history of Zimbabwe's nationalist struggle. This was manifested in the formation of the Southern Rhodesia African National Congress (SRANC) on September 12 (in defiance of what the settlers celebrated as Occupation Day). This was the first mass nationalist organisation. It also marked the beginning of a close alliance between organised African labour and African political parties in colonial Zimbabwe, an alliance that snapped with the split in the nationalist movement in 1963. The conventional assessment, however, has generally been that African labour came to be subordinated to the nationalist struggle with the formation of the SRANC.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodesiana Volume 40
    PUBLICATION No. 40 1979 ~ - ...._,,,, _..,,, ..... _ ------ Pre-publication notice SUBSCRIBERS' LIMITED EDITION of PRINTS FROM WATERCOLOURS by ALICE BALFOUR The National Archives announces the publication of a special edition limited to 500 copies of ten colour prints from original watercolours by Alice Balfour. An accomplished amateur artist, she sketched these scenes in South Africa and during a wagon journey through Matabeleland and Mashonaland in 1894. The prints, together with an introductory text, will be contained in a portfolio in which subscribers' names will appear. Price $60, special pre-publication offer $45. If you are interested in subscribing please write for further particulars co: THE DIRECTOR NATIONAL ARCHIVES PRIVATE BAG 7729 CAUSEWAY THOMAS MEIKLE, 1862-1939 The founder of the Meikle Organisation sailed from Scotland with his parents in 1869 The family settled in Natal where Thomas and his brothers John and Stewart gained their first farming ex­ perience. In 1892 the three brothers set off for Rhodesia with eight ox- wagons. Three months later they had completed the 700 mile trek to Fort Victoria. Here they opened a store made of whisky cases and roofed over with the tarpaulins that had covered their wagons. Progress was at first slow, nevertheless, branches were opened in Salisbury in 1893, Bulawayo and Gwelo in 1894, and in Umtali in 1897. From these small beginnings a vast network of stores, hotels, farms, mines and auxilliary undertakings was built up. These ventuies culminated in the formation of the Thomas Meikle Trust and Investment Company in 1933. The success of these many enterprises was mainly due to Thomas Meikle's foresight and his business acumen, coupled with his ability to judge character and gather around him a loyal and efficient staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Roy Welensky, Prime Ninister of the Crumbling Federation of the Rhodesias and Nyasaland, Went Fishing Together
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS CB-21 $r Roy Welensky July i, 1963 3 Richmond Close Highlands Salisbury, Southern Rhodesia Mr. Richard Nolte Institute of Current World Affairs 366 Nadison Avenue New York 17, New York Dear Mr. Nolte While Ileads of State in the rest of Africa were meeting .t the summit at Addis Abbaba, a small Southern Summ..i Conference was held at Betty's Bay, South Africa, when Dr. Ver- woerd and Sir Roy Welensky, Prime Ninister of the crumbling Federation of the Rhodesias and Nyasaland, went fishing together. Sir Roy could not represent the Sou+/-hem Rhodesian government in any off.cial way, His Federation _is breaking up and he will soon be a man without a job. But in spite of this he is still considered a power in politics here and his actions receive careful scrutiny. During the last 25 years he has worked his way through the "tough school of politics".. He ente*ed political life first as a union organizer and then head of the European Railwaymen's Union in Northern Rhodesia's cooprbel%. Over ten years ago he and sir Godfrey Huggins, Prime Ninister of Southern Rhodesia (later Lord Nalvern), together sold Britain on the idea of a federation of the three central African territories, Northern Rhodesia, Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland. tle succeeded Lord hlalvern as Prime linister of the Federation in 1956. From the beei.ning Africans in Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland, qhere there are very few Europeans, distrusted federation. ey saw Europeans in the three territories uniting to control their rising aspira- tions.
    [Show full text]