Review of Species Selected on the Basis of the Analysis of the European Union and Candidate Countries’ Annual Reports to CITES 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Species Selected on the Basis of the Analysis of the European Union and Candidate Countries’ Annual Reports to CITES 2009 Review of species selected on the basis of the Analysis of the European Union and candidate countries’ annual reports to CITES 2009 (Version edited for public release) Prepared for the European Commission Directorate General Environment ENV.E.2. – Environmental Agreements and Trade by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre November, 2011 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION CITATION MONITORING CENTRE UNEP-WCMC (2011). Review of species selected on The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring the basis of the Analysis of the European Union and Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, candidate countries’ annual reports to CITES 2009. UK, is the specialist biodiversity information Prepared for the European Commission. UNEP- and assessment centre of the United Nations WCMC, Cambridge. Environment Programme (UNEP), run cooperatively with WCMC, a UK charity. The PREPARED FOR Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight the The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the DISCLAIMER centre of decision-making. Through the analysis and synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge The contents of this report do not necessarily the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and reflect the views or policies of UNEP or timely information for conventions, countries contributory organisations. The designations and organisations to use in the development and employed and the presentations do not imply implementation of their policies and decisions. the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP, the European Commission or The UNEP-WCMC provides objective and contributory organisations concerning the legal scientifically rigorous procedures and services. status of any country, territory, city or area or its These include ecosystem assessments, support authority, or concerning the delimitation of its for the implementation of environmental frontiers or boundaries. agreements, global and regional biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and the development of future scenarios. © Copyright: 2011, European Commission Table of Contents 1. Introduction to the Analysis of the European Union Annual Reports to CITES ....................................... 4 2. Introduction to the species sheets ..................................................................................................................... 5 SPECIES: Tridacna maxima ...........................................................................................16 SPECIES: Cedrela odorata ...............................................................................................29 SPECIES: Cyathea australis ............................................................................................42 Annex: Key to purpose and source codes ......................................................................................................... 48 Introduction 1. Introduction to the Analysis of the European Union Annual Reports to CITES UNEP-WCMC undertakes an annual Analysis of the European Union and candidate countries’ annual reports to CITES. This Analysis examines patterns of trade into the European Union and candidate countries, trade in groups of particular note, possible transgressions of suspensions and negative opinions, exports of native species, etc. As part of the 2009 Analysis, imports reported by the EU (and candidate countries) as wild-sourced, ranched, source ‘unknown’ or source ‘blank’ were analysed to identify noteworthy patterns of trade according to five criteria. These criteria were designed to identify: 1. High volume trade in 2009 2. Globally threatened and near threatened species traded at relatively high volumes in 2009 3. Sharp increase in trade in 2009 4. General long term increases or decreases in trade between 2000 and 2009 5. Long term variability in trade between 2000 and 2009. Imports were considered to be ‘high volume’ according to thresholds which were determined by taxonomic group and CITES Appendix (Table 1). In order to account for threat status, the Appendix I threshold was also applied to Appendix II and III species considered to be threatened or near threatened by the IUCN (Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable and Near Threatened in the 2010 IUCN Red List). Table 1. Minimum number of wild, ranched, source ‘unknown’ and source ‘blank’ individuals imported in 2009 needed to qualify for selection on the basis of high trade volume. Taxonomic group CITES Appendix I II II III III CR, EN, VU, NT* CR, EN, VU, NT* Mammals 50 50 5000 50 25000 Birds 50 50 5000 50 25000 Reptiles 50 50 25000 50 50000 Amphibians 50 50 25000 50 — Fish 50 50 25000 50 — Invertebrates (non-corals) 250 250 25000 250 50000 Corals — 10000 25000 10000 50000 Plants (non-tree) 250 250 25000 250 50000 Plants (trees) 250 m³ 250 m³ 500 m³ 250 m³ 2500 m³ * CR = Critically Endangered, EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, NT = Near Threatened in 2010 IUCN Red List The ‘sharp increase’ criterion was designed to determine if there was a sharp increase in importer- reported wild-sourced imports in 2009, compared with the average level of imports between 2004 and 2008. Species that, despite a sharp increase in trade in 2009, were still only traded in very low volumes (i.e. less than 5% of the levels listed in Table 1) were omitted from the chapter. The ‘overall increase’ criteria took into account more general trends over the period 2000-2009 by calculating the slope of a best-fit linear function to the trade data, with a large positive slope indicating a significant increase in trade levels over time. To account for highly variable trade that may not be picked up by the other criteria, the coefficient of variations were calculated for imports over a ten-year period (2000-2009) and species showing high variation over this period were selected. Introduction 2. Introduction to the species sheets On the basis of the Analysis of the European Union and candidate countries’ annual report to CITES 2009, four Annex B and one Annex C species were initially considered as candidates for review (SRG 57 document). Four species were selected by the SRG for in-depth review. Species were selected on the basis of particular patterns of trade to the European Union in 2009. Chelonoidis denticulata and Tridacna maxima were selected on the basis of the high volume of trade in 2009. Cyathea australis was selected on the basis of a sharp increase in trade in 2009. Cedrela odorata was selected on the basis of both the high volume of trade and sharp increase in trade in 2009. Chelonoidis denticulata REVIEW OF SPECIES SELECTED ON THE BASIS OF THE 2009 ANALYSIS OF EU ANNUAL REPORTS REPTILIA TESTUDINIDAE SPECIES: Chelonoidis denticulata SYNONYMS: Geochelone denticulata, Testudo cagado, Testudo denticulata, Testudo hercules, Testudo sculpta, Testudo tabulata, Testudo tessellata COMMON NAMES: Brazilian giant tortoise (English), Forest tortoise (English), South American tortoise (English), South American yellow-footed tortoise (English), Yellow-footed tortoise (English), Tortue de l'Amérique du sud (French), Tortue dentelée (French), Tortue denticulée (French), Motelo (Spanish), Tortuga de patas amarillas (Spanish), Brasiliansk skogssköldpadda (Swedish), Gulfotad landsköldpadda (Swedish) RANGE STATES: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Dominica (int), Ecuador, French Guiana, Guadeloupe (int), Guyana, Peru, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela RANGE STATE UNDER REVIEW: Guyana, Suriname IUCN RED LIST: Vulnerable PREVIOUS EC OPINIONS: Previous Article 4.6(c) import suspension for live wild specimens from all countries first applied on 21/11/1998 and removed on 10/05/2006. Current Article 4.6(b) import suspension for wild specimens from Bolivia and Ecuador first applied on 22/12/1997 and last confirmed on 07/09/2011. Previous positive opinion for Guyana formed on 15/12/1997 and removed on 21/11/1998. Previous positive opinion for Suriname formed on 22/07/1997 and removed on 21/11/1998. Chelonoidis denticulata TRADE PATTERNS: Chelonoidis denticulata was selected for review on the basis of a high volume of trade into the European Union in 2009 (based on the threshold of 50 reptiles for globally threatened or near threatened species). Guyana: Guyana published CITES annual export quotas for 704 live, wild-sourced C. denticulata in each year 2000-2011. According to the CITES Trade Database, trade reported by both Guyana and the importers remained within quota in every year (Table 1); annual reports have not yet been received from Guyana for 2009 or 2010. Imports of C. denticulata to the EU-27 directly from Guyana over the period 2000-2010 consisted exclusively of live, wild-sourced specimens traded for commercial purposes (Table 2). The principal importers were the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Of the direct exports reported by Guyana between 2000 and 2010, 5 per cent were to the EU-27. Indirect trade of C. denticulata originating in Guyana to the EU-27 also comprised live, wild-sourced specimens traded for commercial purposes, the majority of which were re-exported by the United States; the principal importers were the Czech Republic and the Netherlands (Table 3). Direct exports of C. denticulata from Guyana to countries other than the EU-27 consisted of live specimens
Recommended publications
  • Biotechnologies from Marine Bivalves
    Nutrient Extraction Through Bivalves Petersen, Jens Kjerulf; Holmer, Marianne; Termansen, Mette; Hasler, Berit Published in: Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96776-9_10 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Petersen, J. K., Holmer, M., Termansen, M., & Hasler, B. (2019). Nutrient Extraction Through Bivalves. In A. C. Smaal, J. G. Ferreira, J. Grant, J. K. Petersen, & Ø. Strand (Eds.), Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves (pp. 179-208). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96776-9_10 Download date: 05. okt.. 2021 Aad C. Smaal · Joao G. Ferreira · Jon Grant Jens K. Petersen · Øivind Strand Editors Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves Just the pearl II, by Frank van Driel, fine art photography (www.frankvandriel.com), with painted oyster shells of www.zeeuwsblauw.nl Aad C. Smaal • Joao G. Ferreira • Jon Grant Jens K. Petersen • Øivind Strand Editors Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves Editors Aad C. Smaal Joao G. Ferreira Wageningen Marine Research and Universidade Nova de Lisboa Aquaculture and Fisheries group Monte de Caparica, Portugal Wageningen University and Research Yerseke, The Netherlands Jens K. Petersen Technical University of Denmark Jon Grant Nykøbing Mors, Denmark Department of Oceanography Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Øivind Strand Institute of Marine Research Bergen, Norway ISBN 978-3-319-96775-2 ISBN 978-3-319-96776-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96776-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018951896 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 , corrected publication 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Remnants of the Early Dutch in Guyana 1616-1815 Nova Zeelandia (New Zeeland
    Remnants Of The Early Dutch in Guyana 1616-1815 By Dmitri Allicock Coat of arms -Flag of the Dutch West Indian Company- 1798 Map of Essequibo and Demerara Nova Zeelandia (New Zeeland} Guyana is the only English-speaking country in South America, but English has been the official language for less than half the time Europeans occupied the country. The Dutch language was the main medium of communication for 232 years, from the time a group of Dutchmen sailed up the Pomeroon River and settled there, to 1812 when English replaced Dutch as the language used in the Court of Policy (Parliament). To this day, hundreds of villages have retained their original Dutch names like Uitvlugt, Vergenoegen and Zeeburg. Some present-day Guyanese have names like Westmaas, Van Lange and Meertens. No Guyanese citizen or visitor can escape visible and other reminders of our Dutch predecessors. The ruins of a brick fort can still be seen on a little island where the Essequibo, Mazaruni and Cuyuni rivers meet. The original fort was a wooden structure built around 1600 by some Dutch traders who called it Kyk-over-al or "See-over-all" because it provided a commanding view of the three rivers. From 1627 the fort was controlled by the Dutch West India Company, a Holland-based organization which was vested with the power to establish colonies and which monopolized Dutch trade in the New World. The Company appointed Adrianetz Groenewegel as its first Commander to administer Kyk-over-al. The wooden fort was replaced in the 1630s by a brick structure which also served as an administrative centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Competent Persons Report for Certain Assets in Offshore Guyana
    Competent Persons Report for Certain Assets in Offshore Guyana Date of this Report: September 11, 2018 Prepared for: ECO (Atlantic) Oil and Gas Ltd Prepared By: Phone: 1-303-443-2209, Fax: 1-303-443-3156 E-mail: [email protected] Competent Persons Report for Certain Assets in Offshore Guyana Date of this Report: September 11, 2018 Prepared for: ECO (Atlantic) Oil and Gas Ltd Prepared By: Kevin S. Weller Registered Petroleum Engineer State of Colorado #34214 Phone: 1-303-443-2209, Fax: 1-303-443-3156 E-mail: [email protected] m 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The report addresses the ECO (Atlantic) Oil and Gas Ltd (“ECO Atlantic”, “ECO”, “The Company”) exploratory oil and gas assets in offshore Guyana. The assets owned by ECO Atlantic are summarized in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Summary of Assets owned by ECO (Atlantic) Oil and Gas Ltd Working License Water Asset Operator Interest Status Expiry Date Area Depth, (%) (km2)1 meters January 70 to Orinduik Block Tullow 40.0 Exploration 1,800 2026 1,250 Based on probabilistic estimates, the Gross (100%) and Net (40%) Unrisked Prospective Resources for the Orinduik Block of Guyana in millions of barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE6) are listed below in Table 1-2. This is based on a 6:1 gas to oil equivalency. The Gross Unrisked Prospective Resources are presented in Table 1-3 and the Net Unrisked Prospective Resources for the Orinduik Block of Guyana are listed in Table 1-4 below. Table 1-2 Gross and Net Barrels of Oil Equivalent Unrisked Prospective Resources Gross Prospective Oil Net Prospective Oil
    [Show full text]
  • List of All Nominal Recent Species Belonging to the Superfamily Mactroidea Distributed in American Waters
    Appendix A: List of All Nominal Recent Species Belonging to the Superfamily Mactroidea Distributed in American Waters Valid species (in the current combination) Synonym Examined type material Harvella elegans NHMUK 20190673, two syntypes (G.B. Sowerby I, 1825) Harvella pacifica ANSP 51308, syntype Conrad, 1867 Mactra estrellana PRI 21265, holotype Olsson, 1922 M. (Harvella) PRI 2354, holotype sanctiblasii Maury, 1925 Raeta maxima Li, AMNH 268093, lectotype; AMNH 268093a, 1930 paralectotype Harvella elegans PRI 2252, holotype tucilla Olsson, 1932 Mactrellona alata ZMUC-BIV, holotype, articulated specimen; (Spengler, 1802) ZMUC-BIV, paratype, one complete specimen Mactra laevigata ZMUC-BIV 1036, holotype Schumacher, 1817 Mactra carinata MNHN-IM-2000-7038, syntypes Lamarck, 1818 Mactrellona Types not found, based on the figure of the concentrica (Bory de “Tableau of Encyclopedique Methodique…” Saint Vincent, (pl. 251, Fig. 2a, b, pl. 252, Fig. 2c) published in 1827, in Bruguière 1797 without a nomenclatorial act et al. 1791–1827) Mactrellona clisia USNM 271481, holotype (Dall, 1915) Mactrellona exoleta NHMUK 196327, syntype, one complete (Gray, 1837) specimen © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 103 J. H. Signorelli, The Superfamily Mactroidea (Mollusca:Bivalvia) in American Waters, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29097-9 104 Appendix A: List of All Nominal Recent Species Belonging to the Superfamily… Valid species (in the current combination) Synonym Examined type material Lutraria ventricosa MCZ 169451, holotype; MCZ 169452, paratype;
    [Show full text]
  • The Orchidaceae of Primitiae Florae Essequeboensis (1818)
    LANKESTERIANA 18(3): 239–242. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.15517/lank.v18i3.35625 THE ORCHIDACEAE OF PRIMITIAE FLORAE ESSEQUEBOENSIS (1818) CARLOS OSSENBACH Orquideario 25 de Mayo, San José, Costa Rica and Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica [email protected] ABSTRACT. The German botanist and Professor at the University of Göttingen, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Meyer (1782–1856), studied the plants collected in the Dutch colony of Essequibo by Ernst Carl Rodschied and those kept in the herbarium of Professor Franz Karl Mertens, which he had received from a Dutch colonist during the early 1800s. On that basis, he published in 1818 his work Primitiae Florae Essequeboensis, describing 344 species of plants. Among them there are five species of orchids, two of which were new to science. KEY WORDS: Essequibo, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Meyer, Guiana, Orchidaceae Essequibo (or Essequebo in Dutch) was a Dutch on the east, on the eastern border of the Spanish colony on the northern coast of South America from General Captaincy of Venezuela in the Guiana region. 1616 to 1814 (Fig. 1). It was founded between the It formed a part of the settlements that are known under Essequibo River on the west and the Demerara River the collective name of Dutch Guiana. Essequibo’s FIGURE 1. Carte generale et particuliere de la colonie d’Essequebe & Demerarie située dans la Guiane en Amérique. Brave & Wouter (1798). Received 3 July 2018; accepted for publication 11 December 2018. First published online: 17 December 2018. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Costa Rica License 240 LANKESTERIANA FIGURE 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Sub-Region 35 177K 141K 25K
    Caribbean Sub-Region Situation Report - March 2019 Caribbean Sub-Regional Refugee & Migrants Response Plan - Summary Figures Dominican Republic Trinidad and Guyana Aruba Curaçao Tobago 35 177K 141K 25K 35M Appealing Refugees & Refugees & Target Host Financial Partners Migrants in Need Migrants Targeted Community Requirements In recent years, five countries in the sub-region have been hosting growing numbers of refugees and migrants from Venezuela: Aruba, Curaçao, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, and Trinidad and Tobago. It is estimated that around 146,9001 have arrived by air, land, and sea to date, including some returnees in Guyana. Through the 2019 Regional Refugee and Migrants Response Plan (RRMRP), partners have identified the priority needs for both refugees/migrants, and host communities. These are: protection, shelter, access to food, adequate nutrition and health care, including psychosocial support, as well as the provision of livelihoods, and self-reliance opportunities. The RRMRP outlines the intended interventions to address these priority needs and their related financial requirements for the sub-region, in support to the response of national governments. Through the inter-agency coordination platforms (Refugee and Migrants Working Groups) that are being established at the sub-regional and national level, United Nations (UN) agencies, Non- Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and civil society aim to meet the emergency assistance, protection, and integration needs of refugees and migrants from Venezuela, in complementarity and support to existing government’s responses. KEY FIGURES (as of March 2019) Over 146,900 Venezuelans arrived in 11,855 Registered Venezuelan asylum seekers the Caribbean sub-region since 2015.1 in the Caribbean sub-region since 2015.2 No.
    [Show full text]
  • The West Indian Web Improvising Colonial Survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800
    The West Indian Web Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 Bram Hoonhout Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 22 February 2017 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization The West Indian Web Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 Bram Hoonhout Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. dr. Jorge Flores (EUI) Prof. dr. Regina Grafe (EUI) Prof. dr. Cátia Antunes (Leiden University) Prof. dr. Gert Oostindie, KITLV/Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies © Bram Hoonhout, 2017 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I Bram Hoonhoutcertify that I am the author of the work The West Indian web. Improvising colonial survival in Essequibo and Demerara, 1750-1800 I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications. I certify that this work complies with the Code of Ethics in Academic Research issued by the European University Institute (IUE 332/2/10 (CA 297).
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Satellite- Derived Flood Assessment
    18 June 2021 PRELIMINARY SATELLITE- DERIVED FLOOD ASSESSMENT Along the Essequibo and Demerara rivers in Right Bank Essequibo Sub-Region, Region 10- Upper Demerara-Berbice, Guyana Status: Inundated structures near Essequibo river and along Demerara rivers observed Further action(s): continue monitoring GUYANA AREA OF INTEREST (AOI) 18 June 2021 REGION FLOODS OVER GUYANA N 120 km Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 7 Region 5 AOI Region 10 Region 8 Legend Satellite detected water Region boundary as of 16 and17 June 2021 International boundary River Region 6 Satellite detected water as of 16 and 17 June 2021 [Joint ABI/VIIRS] Region 9 Cloud mask Area of interest Background: ESRI Basemap 3 N Right Bank Essequibo Sub-Region, Region 10- Upper Demerara-Berbice 3 km AOI 2 AOI Torani/Bul Linden city letwood Region 10 AOI 1 Right Bank Essequibo Rockstone town AOI 3 Worldview-2 / 15 Jun 2021 Image center: AOI 1 Right Bank Essequibo Sub-Region, 58°32'21.815"W Region 10- Upper Demerara-Berbice 5°59'28.371"N Inundated structures near Essequibo river observed BEFORE AFTER Inundated structures N 60 m Worldview-2 / 16 Dec 2017 Worldview-2 / 15 Jun 2021 5 AOI 2 Image center: AOI 2-1 Right Bank Essequibo Sub-Region, 58°17'35.647"W Region 10- Upper Demerara-Berbice 6°1'32.678"N No floods observed BEFORE AFTER N 150 m Worldview-2 / 26 Aug 2020 Worldview-2 / 15 Jun 2021 6 AOI 2 Image center: AOI 2-2 Linden city, Right Bank Essequibo Sub-Region, 58°18'57.245"W Region 10- Upper Demerara-Berbice 6°0'59.099"N No floods observed BEFORE AFTER Linden city Linden
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLIC of GUYANA V. REPUBLIC of SURINAME
    ARBITRATION UNDER ANNEX VII OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA REPUBLIC OF GUYANA v. REPUBLIC OF SURINAME MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA VOLUME I 22 FEBRUARY 2005 Memorial of Guyana MEMORIAL OF GUYANA PART I 2 Memorial of Guyana TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Page CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................1 I. Reasons for the Institution of Proceedings Against Suriname..............................1 II. Guyana’s Approach to the Presentation of the Case.............................................3 III. Structure of the Memorial.....................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2 - GEOGRAPHY AND EARLY HISTORY ...................................................7 I. Geography.............................................................................................................7 II. Early History.......................................................................................................10 CHAPTER 3 - EFFORTS OF THE COLONIAL POWERS TO SETTLE THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN BRITISH GUIANA AND SURINAME: 1929 TO 1966........13 I. The Fixing of the Northern Land Boundary Terminus between British Guiana and Suriname: 1936................................................................................14 II. The First Attempt To Fix a Maritime Boundary in the Territorial Sea: 1936 ....18 III. The Draft Treaty To Settle the Entire Boundary: 1939 ......................................20 IV. Unsuccessful Post-World
    [Show full text]
  • Ask Most Casual Students of History When the Time of Colonialism Came to an End
    ABSTRACT Guiana and the Shadows of Empire: Colonial and Cultural Negotiations at the Edge of the World Joshua R. Hyles, M.A. Mentor: Keith A. Francis, Ph.D. Nowhere in the world can objective study of colonialism and its effects be more fruitful than in the Guianas, the region of three small states in northeastern South America. The purpose of this thesis is threefold. First, the history of these three Guianas, now known as Guyana, French Guiana, and Suriname, is considered briefly, emphasizing their similarities and regional homogeny when compared to other areas. Second, the study considers the administrative policies of each of the country’s colonizers, Britain, France, and the Netherlands, over the period from settlement to independence. Last, the thesis concentrates on current political and cultural situations in each country, linking these developments to the policies of imperial administrators in the previous decades. By doing so, this thesis hopes to show how an area that should have developed as a single polity could become a region of three very distinct cultures through the altering effects of colonialism. Guiana and the Shadows of Empire: Colonial and Cultural Negotiations at the Edge of the World by Joshua R. Hyles, A.S., B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of History ___________________________________ Jeffrey S. Hamilton, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ Keith A. Francis, Ph.D., Chairperson ___________________________________ David L. Longfellow, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Thomas A.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement – December 2017 – Survey of the Literature on Recent
    A Malacological Journal ISSN 1565-1916 No. 36 - SUPPLEMENT DECEMBER 2017 2 SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE ON RECENT SHELLS FROM THE RED SEA (third enlarged and revised edition) L.J. van Gemert* Summary This literature survey lists approximately 3,050 references. Shells are being considered here as the shell bearing molluscs of the Gastropoda, Bivalvia and Scaphopoda. The area does not only comprise the Red Sea, but also the Gulf of Aden, Somalia and the Suez Canal, including the Lessepsian species in the Mediterranean Sea. Literature on fossils shells, particularly those from the Holocene, Pleistocene and Pliocene, is listed too. Introduction My interest in recent shells from the Red Sea dates from about 1996. Since then, I have been, now and then, trying to obtain information on this subject. Some years ago I decide to stop gathering data in a haphazard way and to do it more properly. This resulted in a first survey of approximately 1,420 and a second one of 2,025 references (van Gemert, 2010 & 2011). Since then, this survey has again been enlarged and revised and a number of errors have been corrected. It contains now approximately 3,050 references. Scope In principle every publication in which molluscs are reported to live or have lived in the Red Sea should be listed in the survey. This means that besides primary literature, i.e. articles in which researchers are reporting their finds for the first time, secondary and tertiary literature, i.e. reviews, monographs, books, etc are to be included too. These publications were written not only by a wide range of authors ranging from amateur shell collectors to professional malacologists but also people interested in the field of archaeology, geology, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • British Guiana – British Empire Exhibition, Wembley 1924
    British Guiana – British Empire Exhibition, Wembley 1924 BRITISH GUIANA BRITISH EMPIRE EXHIBITION WEMBLEY 1924 CONTENTS 1 British Guiana – British Empire Exhibition, Wembley 1924 INTRODUCTION GEOGRAPHY KAIETEUR FALLS POPULATION Aborigines Immigration Centres of Population FAUNA FLORA TIMBER AND FOREST INDUSTRIES SUGAR, R ICE AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES MINING INDUSTRIES COMMERCE AND SHIPPING Communications OPPORTUNITIES FOR CAPITAL 2 British Guiana – British Empire Exhibition, Wembley 1924 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Note: Click here to view these photos Kaieteur Falls, Potaro River A Locust Tree (Hymencea courbaril) A Road in the Interior, 150 miles Heading out Sugar Canes to Punts from Georgetown Potato River, on the way to Steam Hoist Lifting Canes at a Kaieteur Falls Sugar Factory Brink of Kaieteur Falls Loading the Cut Cane into Punts on a Sugar Estate In the Gorge below Kaieteur Falls; Ploughing a Rice Field looking down river Amatuk Rest House, Potaro River, Harvesting the Rice on the way to Kaieteur Falls Gold Digging Camp at foot of A Coconut Plantation Eagle Mountain Wismar, 65 miles up Demerara Indian Girl Spinning Cotton River Kanaka Mountains and Interior The Rupununi Cattle Trail, Bridge Savannas Over a Creek Aboriginal Indians Travelling by Steer Bred on Rupununi Savanna Corial Indian Shooting Fish Rupununi River, looking North to the Kanaka Mountains The Public Buildings, Georgetown Alluvial Gold Mining Main Street, Georgetown, and the Cattle on the Rupununi Savannas War Memorial 3 British Guiana – British Empire Exhibition,
    [Show full text]