DOCSLIB.ORG

Sixt SE Company Presentation 16 June 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sixt SE Company Presentation 16 June 2021 ONE STRATEGY ALL FOR AND FOR ALL SIXT SE INVESTOR PRESENTATION JUNE 2021 1 This presentation (together with the presenters’ further discussions of the Company with any of Presentation contains summary information only speeches and any other related verbal or written the recipients thereof shall, under any and does not purport to be comprehensive and is communications the “Presentation”) contains circumstances, create any implication that there not intended to be (and should not be used as) forward-looking statements relating to the has been no change in the affairs of the the basis of any analysis or other evaluation. In business, financial performance and results of Company since such date. Consequently, the addition, the information in the Presentation is Sixt SE (together with its subsidiaries, the Company does not undertake any obligation to subject to change. No representation or warranty “Company”) and/or the industry in which the review, update or confirm expectations or (express or implied) is made as to, and no Company operates. Forward-looking statements estimates or to release publicly any revisions to reliance should be placed on, any information, concern future circumstances and results and any forward-looking statements to reflect events including projections, estimates, targets and other statements that are not historical facts, that occur or circumstances that arise in relation opinions, contained herein, and no liability sometimes identified by the words “believes,” to the content of the Presentation. Furthermore, whatsoever is accepted as to any errors, “expects,” “predicts,” “intends,” “projects,” “plans,” a totally different performance can ensue from an omissions or misstatements contained herein. “estimates,” “aims,” “foresees,” “anticipates,” unexpected slump in demand or economic Due to rounding it is possible that figures may “targets,” and similar expressions. Forward- stagnation in our key markets. The actual not add up exactly and that half or full year looking statements, including assumptions, development can differ materially from the figures do not correspond to added quarterly opinions and views of the Company or cited from forecasts made in this Presentation, in case one figures. For the same reason, percentages may DISCLAIMER third party sources, are solely opinions and of the aforementioned risks or other risks not not exactly match absolute numbers they forecasts which are uncertain and subject to mentioned here should materialize and/or the correspond to. risks. Actual events may differ significantly from assumption on which we have based our any anticipated development due to a number of forecasts and prospects turn out to be wrong. The Presentation does not constitute or form part factors, including without limitation, changes in of, and should not be construed as, an offer, general economic conditions, in particular in the Certain industry and market information in the solicitation or invitation to subscribe for, Company’s target markets and changes in Presentation and/or related materials has been underwrite or otherwise acquire, any securities of competition levels. The Company does not obtained by the Company from third party the Company nor should it or any part of it form guarantee that the assumptions underlying sources. The Company has not independently the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, forward-looking statements are free from errors verified such information and neither the any contract to purchase or subscribe for any nor does it accept any responsibility for the future Company nor any of its directors provides any securities of the Company, nor shall it or any part accuracy of opinions or any obligation to update assurance as to the accuracy, fairness or of it form the basis of or be relied on in the statements in the Presentation to reflect completeness of such information or opinions connection with any other investment subsequent events. Forward-looking statements contained in this document and neither the whatsoever. are made only as of the date of the Presentation. Company nor any of its directors takes any Neither the delivery of the Presentation nor any responsibility for such information. This 2 We don‘t want to be the largest mobility player on the planet, but the most profitable one, thereby creating above average returns for our stakeholders. ERICH SIXT 3 SIXT share price development 1960s 2008 one of the first car-leasing 1976 1986 SIXT is the first car rental 2015 2020 companies is created by Regine Sixt joins the initial public offering of company in the world that 2011 SIXT leasing initial public SIXT sells its stake in Sixt Erich Sixt the company SIXT AG enables booking via iPhone SIXT enters the USA offering Leasing for EUR 163 m 1970 1977 1990 June 9th 2011 2015 2019 SIXT adds vans and the company has SIXT is Germanys biggest foundation of DriveNow – Alexander & ONE Launch: SIXT trucks to the fleet branches at every major car rental with more than a joint venture with BMW Konstantin SIXT becomes an integrated German airport 1,500 employees and over join Managing mobility service provider 1,000 branches Board of Sixt SE 4 EXPERIENCE & CONTINUITY TECH THROUGH FAMILY OWNERSHIP SIXT MANAGEMENT TEAM years with SIXT James Klaus Adams Kolitz 16 12 President eCommerce & CTO Revenue Mgmt. Konstantin Alexander former former Sixt Sixt booking.com & Trivago Co-CEOs rentalcars.com OPERATIONS 17 1 1 Nico Kai Daniel Gabriel Andrejewski Marasch COO CFO VAN & TRUCK 13 31 13 VOTING RIGHT DISTRIBUTION % Estanislao Dirk Michael de Mata Hünten Meissner EVP SIXT Spain VP Region South President & COO SIXT USA 58.3% COMBINING LONG TERM SIXT FAMILY OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH PUBLIC INNOVATIVE DIGITAL KNOW-HOW 5 Source: Annual Report 2020 OUR VISION: EXCITE OUR CUSTOMERS WITH THE FREEDOM OF GLOBAL MOBILITY WITHOUT OWNING A CAR FACTS ABOUT DEVELOPMENT OF CAR OWNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT OF RELEVANT MOBILITY MARKETS LIKELY TO PUSH RENTAL AND SUBSCRIPTION BUSINESS 2030 41% of global car owners 2025 reconsider ownership 2021 >20% of consumers in countries like USA and Germany rate flexibility and >15% rate all-in rates very high” >20% of consumers in countries like USA, Germany or China are interested or very interested in car subscriptions USD ~65 bn USD ~510 bn USD ~6,700 bn of US and German citizens are RENTAL CAR RENTAL, TOTAL MARKET >50% MARKET RIDE HAILING, TAXI INCL. PRIVATE CARS willing to pay a premium for the flexibility & CAR SHARING UNLIMITED SCALABILITY IN A USD 6,700 BN MARKET 6 Source: Market Sizes: McKinsey & Company: Automotive revolution – perspective towards 2030, Statista.com; Facts: Deloitte: Automotive Study 2021, Arthur D. Little: The Future of Automotive Mobility (Feb 2021) SIXT’S BUSINESS MODEL: SCALABLE, VARIABLE, FINANCIALLY SOLID, DIVERSIFIED ONE APP 21% 47% ONE -3 months 6 MONTHS AVERAGE +3 months PRODUCT HOLDING PERIOD 32% PORTFOLIO VARIABLE PLATFORM COST BASE ONE FLEET LARGE SIXT VEHICLE POOL SCALABILITY VARIABILITY Fleet (e.g. depreciation, vehicle insurance, repair) State-of-the art technology About 80% of our cost base Variable (e.g. provisions, sales and marketing) platform and large vehicle is variable as we can extend ONE Fixed (e.g. personnel and other overhead costs) TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM TECHNOLOGY platform allow us to scale or shorten our vehicle PLATFORM our business fast holding periods 94% Share of Buyback 2020 Airport 1 FINANCIALLY DIVERSIFIED Agreements with OEMs REVENUE 39% Downtown & SOLID A diversified customer SPLIT Railway and location mix [%] 61% Platform model for non-core We have a risk-averse and minimize our market products financially solid business risks model building on a high equity ratio CUSTOMER 63 Equity ratio of 31.5% 58 62 62 MIX 51 55 [%] Corporate 40 36 34 Mainly fleet debt: 100% of net 31 32 30 Retail debt used for fleet assets Others 9 9 8 7 6 7 7 1 buyback agreements include operating leases Source: Annual Report 2020 and previous years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 GROUP REVENUE EUR m GROUP EBT EUR m 4000 400 337 3,306 350 300 SIXT HAS A STRONG 3000 +106% +2,132% 250 LONG-TERM 200 150 GROWTH STORY 2000 100 PRIOR TO COVID-19 50 1000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 THE COMPANY HAS DOUBLED ITS 1700% 20% REVENUE BETWEEN 1500% OUTPERFORMING 1300% THE COMPETITION 2009 AND 2019, AT 1100% 12.4 THE SAME TIME 900% 10% 700% INCREASING 500% PROFITABILITY BY 300% 100% >2,000% 0% -100% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 SHARE PRICE %1 OP. EBT MARGIN % 2 8 2018 Group EBT without one-off effect of DriveNow sale; Total EBT sums up to EUR 535m Source: Annual Reports Sixt ; 1 Bloomberg, development of share price based on values as of 4th Jan 2010 and IPO of Europcar 2 Represented as operating return on revenue. From 2017 to 2019 numbers are adjusted for the sale of Sixt Leasing SE CONSISTENT LONG-TERM REVENUE GROWTH AND MARGINS – QUICK ADAPTABILITY IN TIMES OF CRISIS FLEET LEVEL DURING CORONA EBT MARGIN DURING PANDEMIC 2019-2021 COVID-19 RECESSION GROUP REVENUE GROWTH YoY [in %] [Fleet % Change YoY] [EBT Margin in %] 21.3% 14.4% 12.6%12.8% 10.7% 8.7% 7.9% 3.6% Nov. Jan. März Mai Juli Sept. Nov. Jan. 1.7% 2.0% 2019 2020 2021 -1.1% -4.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 -7.1% 1 OPERATING EBT MARGIN [in %] -52.2% Target-Margin of 10% 12.4%12.4% Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 10.1% 10.3%10.3% 9.1% 9.5% 9.6% 8.3% 7.7% WAVE 1 WAVE 2 Loosening Fleet Rental Days Restrictions 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 9 Source: Sixt Annual Reports 1 EBT Margin = EBT / Group Operating Revenue, From 2017 to 2019 numbers are adjusted for the sale of Sixt Leasing SE SNAPSHOT 2020: STRONG COST MEASURES TO RESPOND TO COVID-19 CRISIS COST AND LIQUIDITY MEASURES GROWTH INITIATIVES SELECTED MEASURES Cost savings program [EUR m] GROWTH INITIATIVES .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Avis Budget Group Budget Dollar Dtg / Dtag Ean Ehi
    Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com This list is divided into two sections; by company and state. The “company” list includes HQ information. The “state” list only includes field security contacts. Unless otherwise noted, all contacts are for corporate locations only but they should be able to provide contact information for licensee / franchise locations, if applicable. Most agencies have a “controlled” fleet meaning that vehicles seen locally with out of state plates are likely on rent locally. Revised – 09/24/19 Visit www.carrentalsecurity.com for the most current contact list. Please visit www.truckrentalsecurity.com for truck rental/leasing company contacts. Please see footer for additional information. SECURITY CONTACTS – Company ABG ALAMO AVIS AVIS BUDGET GROUP BUDGET DOLLAR DTG / DTAG EAN EHI ENTERPRISE FIREFLY HERTZ NATIONAL PAYLESS PV HOLDING RENTAL CAR FINANCE TCL Funding Ltd Partner THRIFTY ZIPCAR OTHER CAR RENTAL AGENCIES TRUCK RENTALS SECURITY CONTACTS – State AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY CANADA DISCLAIMER – This list is for the exclusive use of Car Rental Security and Law Enforcement. This list IS NOT to be used for solicitation purposes. Every effort has been made to provide accurate and current information. Errors, additions/deletions should be sent to [email protected]. All rights reserved. Copyright 2019 Page 1 Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com
    [Show full text]
  • Carsharing 2025 – Nische Oder Mainstream?
    CarSharing 2025 – nische oder MainStreaM? Sebastian Riegler, Maria Juschten, Reinhard Hössinger, Regine Gerike, Lars Rößger Bernhard Schlag, Wilko Manz, Christoph Rentschler, Johanna Kopp Mit diesem Bericht werden die Ergebnisse einer Grundlagenstudie zu neuen Nutzungskonzepten für individuelle Mobilität zusammengefasst. Das Projekt wurde beauftragt durch das Institut für Mobilitätsforschung (ifmo) und durchgeführt vom Institut für Verkehrswesen der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, dem Lehrstuhl für Verkehrspsychologie der Technischen Universität Dresden und der INOVAPLAN GmbH. Die Studienautoren danken allen Carsharing-Anbietern, die die Studie unterstützt und sie dadurch erst ermöglicht haben. Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Institut für Verkehrswesen: Sebastian Riegler, Maria Juschten, Dr. Reinhard Hössinger, Prof. Regine Gerike Technische Universität Dresden, Lehrstuhl für Verkehrspsychologie: Lars Rößger, Prof. Bernhard Schlag INOVAPLAN GmbH: Dr. Wilko Manz, Christoph Rentschler Design: Bernhard Moosbauer, www.exsample.org © 2016 ifmo 4 CARShARing 2025 – nischE oDER MAinstream? 5 Inhalt Vorwort 6 Kapitel 4 Ist Carsharing für meine Wege geeignet? 71 Danksagung 7 a. Wofür wird Carsharing genutzt? 72 Executive Summary 8 Planung der Buchungen: Spontanität vs. Vorausdenker 72 Beginnzeiten der Fahrten: After-Work vs. Afternoon Tea 73 Kapitel 1 Einleitung 11 Fahrtweiten: Nahverkehr vs. Langstrecke 74 a. Grundlagen des Teilens und Nutzens 12 Start & Ziel der Fahrten: Innerstädtisch vs. Fahrten ins Grüne 76 Teilen, Nutzen, Besitz, Eigentum – Begriffsklärung 12 Fahrtzwecke: Freizeit & nach Hause vs. Einkauf & Ausflug 77 Welche Motive bedienen Eigentum und eigentumslose Nutzung? 14 Alternative zu Carsharing: zu Fuß und eigener Pkw vs. Erweiterung der Mobilität 78 b. Was unterscheidet Carsharing von anderen Formen der Pkw-Nutzung? 17 Verzicht auf Carsharing: Parkplatzproblematik vs. Umweltgedanke 80 c. Die Forschungsfrage: Was wollen wir erreichen? 19 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Financial Report 2016
    16 0 2 t r po l Re Annua The Sixt secret of success. Annual Report 2016 THE SIXT GROUP IN FIGURES in EUR million 2016 2015 Change 2016 on 2014 2015 in % Revenue 2,413 2,179 10.7 1,796 Thereof in Germany 1,444 1,364 5.8 1,197 Thereof abroad 969 815 18.9 599 Thereof operating1 2,124 1,939 9.5 1,645 Thereof rental revenue 1,534 1,377 11.4 1,120 Thereof leasing revenue 219 211 3.7 193 Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) 256 222 15.3 199 Earnings before taxes (EBT) 218 185 17.9 157 Consolidated profit 157 128 22.2 110 Net income per share (basic) Ordinary share (in EUR) 3.00 2.39 25.5 2.28 Preference share (in EUR) 3.02 2.41 25.3 2.30 Total assets 4,029 3,660 10.1 2,818 Lease assets 1,021 958 6.6 902 Rental vehicles 1,957 1,763 11.0 1,262 Equity 1,080 1,059 2.0 742 Equity ratio (in %) 26.8 28.9 -2.1 Points 26.3 Non-current financial liabilities 1,370 921 48.9 1,131 Current financial liabilities 762 909 -16.2 289 Dividend per share Ordinary share (in EUR) 1.652 1.50 10.0 1.20 Preference share (in EUR) 1.672 1.52 9.9 1.22 Total dividend, net 77.72 71.5 8.7 58.0 Number of employees3 6,212 5,120 21.3 4,308 Number of locations worldwide (31 Dec.)4 2,200 2,153 2.2 2,177 Thereof in Germany 509 508 0.2 483 1 Revenue from rental and leasing business, excluding revenue from the sale of used vehicles 2 Proposal by the management 3 Annual average 4 Including franchise countries CONTENT A TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS 4 A.1 Letter to our shareholders 4 A.2 Report of the Supervisory Board 7 A.3 Sixt shares 10 A.4 Corporate governance report 14 B MANAGEMENT REPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Car Sharing on Urban Sustainability
    sustainability Review Impact of Car Sharing on Urban Sustainability Vasja Roblek 1 , Maja Meško 2,3 and Iztok Podbregar 3,* 1 Faculty of Organisation Studies in Novo Mesto, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Management, University of Primorska, 6000 Koper, Slovenia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, 4000 Kranj, Slovenia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The article gives us an insight into the key issues of car sharing and its impact on urban sus- tainability. A selection of 314 articles published in peer-reviewed journals from the Scopus database were analysed using Leximancer 5.0 for Automated Content analysis. A total of seven themes were identified explaining the researched topic of the car sharing situation in Europe, which are sharing, economy, model, systems, electrical car sharing, policy and travel. There are two ways of sharing owned cars in Europe; access to cars from the fleet of private organisations and P2P car sharing. Sustainable environmental solutions in the context of the electrification of cars are used. Car sharing usually takes place online and can be free or for a fee as defined by The European Economic and Social Committee. The article provides an overview of understanding the concept of urban car sharing in Europe. Keywords: sustainability; urban sustainability; car sharing; Europe 1. Introduction This article aims to provide an overview of understanding the concept of urban car sharing, whose growth and development has been influenced by the recent financial crisis Citation: Roblek, V.; Meško, M.; that caused an economic recession in both the US and Europe between 2007 and mid-2009, Podbregar, I.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area
    Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report | Report Number 20-03 | February 2020 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority New York, NY Robyn Marquis, PhD Project Manager, Clean Transportation Prepared by: WXY Architecture + Urban Design New York, NY Adam Lubinsky, PhD, AICP Managing Principal Amina Hassen Associate Raphael Laude Urban Planner with Barretto Bay Strategies New York, NY Paul Lipson Principal Luis Torres Senior Consultant and Empire Clean Cities NYSERDA Report 20-03 NYSERDA Contract 114627 February 2020 Notice This report was prepared by WXY Architecture + Urban Design, Barretto Bay Strategies, and Empire Clean Cities in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Quickar(PDF 8.49
    7 September 2017 The Secretary, Economy and Infrastructure Committee Parliament House, Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Dear Secretary, Please accept this cover letter and attached report as a submission to the Committee’s Inquiry into Electric Vehicles. A mushrooming of Melbourne’s population over the next 20 years combined with the phenomena of significant population detachment from economic hubs driven by growing rates of car ownership and burgeoning investment by government in private car driver-driven infrastructure is a looming urban mobility crisis. We risk sleepwalking into a situation where our once “world’s most livable city” has insufficient public transport, overloaded infrastructures, a default logarithmic expansion of motorised means of transport, a vast rise in air and noise pollution and CO2 emissions, a concomitant parking capacity problem and increasing disparity in the social equity standards between communities of very near proximity. What should the Victorian Government do? The attached report assesses the opportunity for Free Floating Car Sharing in Zero Emission urban transport. This report concludes that Free Floating Car Sharing is an innovative technology with a smart operating model that improves cities. It offers cities a no-cost, scaleable transport alternative to supplement existing transport systems and reduce inner urban vehicle congestion. Moreover, Free Floating Car Sharing offers Melbourne’s best opportunity for a definitive, practical and evolutionary pathway into a sustainable Zero Emission urban mobility future through the accelerated uptake of Electric Vehicles. Quickar Pty Ltd (ABN 99 611 879 513) Melbourne, 3000 Victoria, Australia Page 1 of 66 In light of these conclusions, the Victorian Government should: • Enable Free Floating Car Sharing.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixt Car Rental Terms
    Sixt Car Rental Terms Petr remains ancient after Hunt deletes voetstoots or vilified any eiderdowns. Fredric usually lackeys richly or embrittles regressively when scot-free Vasily owe arco and synecologically. If carefree or pianistic Cleveland usually Prussianize his unifier loges plumb or bestraddling across-the-board and squalidly, how sweet is Christorpher? Hertz gold plus get where you car terms of gas only the links golf carts are occasional special cleaning to rent a zero with the plane For sixt brand of terms. Are car rental? But terms of sixt croatia that since i believe it? Used car at sixt, if using a search through a refund not with sixt car, glasses and fees and binding agreement we leave a little fuel option. Thanks for car terms and terms of renting a steady daily fee to go. The price is why you breach with renting a business, it work with its daily mileage when writing a set of vanguard car rental? Please indicate the. After you can at the rankings and are available to recover the code, farms and sell or loss due to the benefits that links its office. Please cancel a sixt offer you often times are you for actually cancel or travel budget has its terms and other countries, and get charged by? The vehicle to authorise it included within the police. Writing these attacks worked like it is providing automobile insurance? Looking forward to sixt cars manner in terms of your car leasing in parsippany, there is included in most cars are now and. Car be stunned by sixt car.
    [Show full text]
  • Ischannel Volume 12 Online
    iS CHANNEL Closed Platforms Open Doors: Deriving Strategic Im- plications from the Free-Floating Car Sharing Platform DriveNow Curtis Goldsby MSc in Information Systems and Digital Innovation Department of Management London School of Economics and Political Science KEYWORDS ABSTRACT Open platforms This paper examines the free-floating car-sharing company DriveNow, Closed platforms governed by a joint venture of BMW Group and Sixt SE. The platform-mediated network model is used to determine DriveNow is a closed platform. Relating Drivenow this to adoption/appropriability characteristics, I show how the closed nature Car-sharing of the platform strategically affects DriveNow. Business strategy It is concluded that DriveNow, although closed, can pursue at least three Platform strategy successful platform strategies, but struggles capitalizing on multi-sided network effects. The paper thus shows how a closed platform born through traditional ventures, despite growth bottlenecks, also has the potential to disrupt industries. 1. Introduction a closed platform that does not yet fully capitalize on open multi-sided network effects. Digital platforms are radically transforming every industry today (de Reuver, Sørensen, & Basole, 2017). The relevance of exploring digital platforms and The competitive edge and profit growth achieved researching them in the IS field has been recently through digital platforms indicate why so many emphasized by de Reuver, Sørensen, & Basole (2017). firms are including the power of platforms into their The challenges highlighted by the researchers stem existing business strategies (Parker, Van Alstyne, & from the exponentially growing scale of platform Choudary, 2016). For some “born-digital” companies innovation, increasing complexity of architectures like Microsoft and Amazon, this inclusion of and and the spread of digital platforms to many industries diversification through platforms is easier than for (de Reuver, Sørensen, & Basole, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Sixt Innovation Project a Swifty Smile
    Sixt Innovation Project A Swifty Smile In this hackfest we concentrated on the Sixt mobile app family and how the registration or better to say onboarding process for new users can be improved, speed up and even made more entertaining. Customer profile Sixt SE is a European multinational car rental company with about 4,000 locations in over 105 countries. Sixt SE acts as a parent and holding company of the Sixt Group, which is internationally active in the business areas of vehicle rental and leasing. The majority of the company (60%) is owned by the Sixt family, who manage the company. The remaining share is tradeable stock: SIX2 (XETRA). It is the largest car rental company in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Israel. Attendees • Werner Huber, Director, Sixt Labs • Manuela Rink, Technical Evangelist, Microsoft • Robert Horrion, Intern, Microsoft The mobile app family Sixt has quite a range of mobile apps (developed either for the iOS and Android mobile platform)by now which they are constantly maintaining and optimizing for their users. • Sixt App (iOS & Android) • Drivenow App (iOS & Android) • Mydriver App (iOS & Android) All mobile apps use a dedicated registration process which verifies the user's identity combined with a fraud check. Currently the user registration process is part of the app's onboarding step and needs an asynchronous validity check executed by an employee of Sixt to be finally verified. This means, that the user needs to wait until this step is finalize. Afterwards she can eventually start to use the app and rent a car. Which instantly leads us Sixt's current pain points.
    [Show full text]
  • Carsharing Boomt in Stuttgart Thomas Schwarz
    KurzberichteKurzbericht Statistik und Informationsmanagement, Monatsheft 7/2015 Carsharing boomt in Stuttgart Thomas Schwarz Seit der Entwicklung des Prinzips des Abbildung 1: Fahrzeuge und Kunden der stadtmobil carsharing AG in Stuttgart 2005 bis 2015 Carsharings 1987 in Zürich, also des Teilens von Autos mit anderen Men- Fahrzeuge Kunden schen, hat diese Art der Autonutzung Anzahl Anzahl in vielen Städten und Gemeinden Ein- 400 7000 zug gehalten und die Zahl der Nutzer 360 wie die der angebotenen Fahrzeuge 6000 6060 ist rapide angestiegen. Was man 300 5000 sonst eher aus dem Urlaub kennt, ein Fahrzeug am Urlaubsort zu mieten, 200 4000 wird immer mehr auch im Alltag prak- tiziert. In Deutschland geht man aktu- 3000 ell von über 1 Mio. Carsharern aus.1 100 99 2000 2044 Grundsätzlich unterscheidet man stati- 0 0 onsbasierte und stationsunabhängige 2005 07 09 11 13 3/2015 2005 07 09 11 13 3/2015 („free floating“) Carsharing-Ange- bote. 37 Prozent der Fahrberechtigten nutzen stationäre Anbieter wie Flinkster 196 (Dt. Bahn), Stadtmobil oder Cambio2 Quelle: stadtmobil carsharing AG und 63 Prozent fl exible Anbieter wie car2go (Daimler) oder Drive Now Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Statistisches Amt (BMW).3 Bei der Anzahl der Fahrzeuge ist das Verhältnis mit 58 zu 42 Prozent umgekehrt. Das ergibt ein Verhältnis 2000 in eine Aktiengesellschaft um- Stuttgart ist damit nach Karlsruhe und von Fahrberechtigten je Auto von 42 gewandelt wurde. Die stadtmobil car- vor Frankfurt die deutsche Großstadt bei stationsbasierten und von 103 bei sharing AG konzentrierte sich fortan mit der zweithöchsten Carsharing- stationsunabhängigen Anbietern. Letz- auf den Ausbau des Angebots in Dichte.5 tere werden auch nur in 13 Großstäd- Stuttgart, der weiterhin existierende ten angeboten, während stationäres Verein stadtmobil e.V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Carsharing on Car Ownership in German Cities
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Transportation Research Procedia 19 ( 2016 ) 215 – 224 International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport Transforming Urban Mobility, mobil.TUM 2016, 6-7 June 2016, Munich, Germany The Impact of Carsharing on Car Ownership in German Cities Dr. Flemming Giesel*, Dr. Claudia Nobis German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Transport Research, Rutherfordstraße 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany Abstract Carsharing, currently growing strongly in Germany, is an important instrument for sustainable urban mobility. The present boom is mainly due to so-called “free-floating carsharing”. Whilst the environmental effects of station-based carsharing have been intensively studied in the German-speaking context, to date there have been hardly any empirical findings on the effect of free- floating carsharing. Using the example of DriveNow and Flinkster in Berlin and Munich, this article examines to what extent free-floating carsharing leads to a reduction of car ownership compared to station-based carsharing. Based on online surveys (n=819/227) carried out within the “WiMobil” project (9/2012 – 10/2015), descriptive analyses and two binary logistic regressions were performed. The findings show that station-based and free-floating carsharing leads to a reduction of private cars but to different degrees (DriveNow 7%; Flinkster 15%). The shedding of cars is influenced by the frequency of use of carsharing and the increasing membership of station-based carsharing providers. Furthermore, for many people of both systems carsharing is an important reason not to buy a car. But there is also a significant proportion of people planning a car purchase. This is true especially for car-savvy persons for whom car ownership is very important.
    [Show full text]
  • Boulder Access Management and Parking Strategies On-Street Car
    Boulder Access Management and Parking Strategies On-Street Car Share Policy DRAFT September 2015 On-Street Car Share Policy Review and Recommendations Draft Report September 2015 Executive Summary Introduction Carsharing represents a new approach in transportation policy that is influenced by a larger philosophy that has come to be known as the “sharing economy”. Carsharing taps into a new mindset (generally attributed to the Millennial generation) that deprioritizes vehicle ownership, embraces concerns about rising congestion in cities, promotes more environmentally sensitive policies and the embraces the desire to have a greater range of transportation options. As traffic congestion and parking concerns increase in Boulder, carsharing will become an important component of the overall Access Management and Parking Strategies (AMPS) program. Carsharing has proven effective as a tool to reduce the number of personal cars on the street, increase travel flexibility for people who do not have personal vehicles and reduces both traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies have shown that carsharing decreases personal car miles traveled per year, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, increases perceived mobility of a city, reduces traffic and cuts down on parking congestion. Carsharing also allows increased mobility for low-income populations without owning a vehicle and puts more fuel efficient vehicles on the roads with most carsharing services requiring a certain fuel efficiency for each car in their fleet. Carsharing also has a documented impact on vehicle ownership rates and greenhouse gas emissions: Research shows carsharing members reduce average vehicle ownership from 0.47 to 0.24 vehicles per household. (Smart Mobility, page 21) According to Zipcar, 13% of car share users in Washington, DC and Boston have sold a car since joining and more than 40% have avoided buying a car.
    [Show full text]