“Can't See the Forest for the Trees”
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
DESKTOP REVIEW REPORT 18 MARCH 2017. “can’t see the forest for the trees” TEDWG ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLAN TEDWG ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANITOBA SOCIAL ENTERPRISE STRATEGY MANITOBA SOCIAL DRAFT KARL WIXON. For ARAHIA & BIGGAR IDEAS partnership. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 REVIEW METHOD 3 3.0 OVERVIEW OF FINDINGS 4 3.1 SUMMARY OF DOCUMENT REVIEW FINDINGS 6 4.0 DATA 7 4.1 CENSUS DATA 7 4.2 TPOCNK REAP REPORT APR2015 10 5.0 STRATEGY 10 5.1 RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (REDS) 11 5.2 TEDWG ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLAN 12 5.3 NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2000 13 5.4 MANITOBA COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2014-2019 15 5.5 MANITOBA SOCIAL ENTERPRISE STRATEGY 16 5.6 TPOCNK REAP REVIEW 17 6.0 MINING 18 6.1 MANITOBA MINING ASSOC. 2016-2019 DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN 18 6.2 MANITOBA MINING ASSOC. ANNUAL REPORT JAN-DEC 2015 21 6.3 SURVEY OF MINING COMPANIES 22 6.4 PERMIT TIMES FOR MINING EXPLORATION 23 7.0 FIRST NATIONS & METIS 24 7.1 COMMUNITY BASED ECONOMIC ACTION PLAN FOR FIRST NATIONS. NORTHERN MANITOBA. 25 7.2 METIS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 26 7.3 THE DUTY TO CONSULT 27 7.4 WHY FIRST NATIONS SUCCEED 28 7.5 GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FN RECONCILIATION: GROWING CANADA’S ECONOMY BY $27.7BN 29 8.0 TOURISM 31 8.1 THE BENEFITS OF TOURISM 31 8.2 GROWING STRONGER TOGETHER 31 8.3 TOURISM INDICATORS 33 9.0 TRADE 34 9.1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE STRATEGY FOR MANITOBA 34 10.0 MANITOBA HYDRO 37 10.1 MANITOBA HYDRO ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 37 10.2 MANITOBA HYDRO CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN 40 11.0 OTHER INFO 41 11.1 DECLARATION OF COMMON VALUES BOREAL DEVELOPMENT 42 11.2 NORTHERN REGION ECONOMIC PROFILE 42 11.3 MAXIMISING MANITOBA’S POTENTIAL 43 12.0 EDUCATION 46 DRAFT 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report provides a summary overview of observations grouped under a few key sections, from desktop review of publications as provided and sourced, as well as independent online review. It is not trying to provide a detailed summary of, nor necessarily mirror their findings. It looks at each report and asks the question ‘So what?’, what might this mean in terms of needs and economic opportunity for the Look North Movement. Commentary provided here may in places be contrary to report findings or recommendations, based on looking at these reports through a lens of long term growth and designing a future, whereas a data analysis generated approach tends to project an expected future and looks at opportunities based on trends, when often solutions defy trends to alter from the projected trajectory into uncharted territory. Commentary provided has also been influenced by findings of face to face meetings in Thompson, The Pas and Flin Flon undertaken in December 2016. The phrase “Can’t see the forest for the trees” feels like an accurate description of the current situation for a region awash in strategy where most of it is broad in scope and high level in nature – with little ‘hard strategy’ focussing on specific growth opportunities. While some of the individual documents may, in places, have hints of colour and energy, en masse they become grey. There is no stand-out highlights beyond what feels like an inventory of ‘to do’s’ with a focus on developing an ‘eco-system for success’, rather than growth opportunities. Many suffer a similar syndrome of trying to be all things to all people and. in doing so. render themselves into being not much for anyone. Every document reviewed feels very inward looking, perhaps that is the phenomena of being in the centre of the continent; no robust ‘outside-in’ perspective is evident. If there is a key lesson in this for Look North, it is the need to ‘shift the dial’ from a quite passive state, to an active one and from an inward looking one, to an outward looking one. The most valuable thing we could do is unearth ‘real opportunities’ that can be advanced by ‘real people’ – where policy or systemic change is not the only targeted outcome. That is not to ignore the need for policy and systemic change, but to recognize enterprise development as requiring action and investment as key to unlocking new long term growth. It also highlights the need for the Look North Task Force to make some hard decisions about what to focus on and what not to focus on. From my analysis, the greatest missing dimension from all of the documents reviewed, is a focus on new enterprise generation beyond meeting local needs, but meeting wider market and global market needs to stimulate new activity and bring in new revenue and investment to Manitoba. Most of the ‘local solutions for local needs’ agenda merely serve to recycle capital and revenue within the economy – which is important, but will not generate the long-term lift required. Tourism is one of the few domestically delivered ‘exports’ but, at this stage, only represents 2.8% of GDP and is very domestically focussed. Some sectors not reviewed here or highlighted in any of the strategies reviewed, have immeasurable potential e.g. the development of a vibrant Northern Digital sector, for instance, need not suffer from geographic constraints, other than broadband access. Everything points to a need for a shift in enterprise culture from an internal ‘service’ mentality to a more innovative outward looking ‘high value’ one. Many of the areas of current economic development focus sit on the consumption side of GDP, not production. If Look North could stand out amongst the trees, it would perhaps be by focussing on the production side of GDP more strongly by stimulating outward looking new enterprise development as a necessary companion to a focus on social enterprise. This report proposes a framework for that dual focus. 2.0 REVIEW METHOD This review was undertaken to assist with: DRAFT 3 Developing an ‘aerial’ view of the Manitoba Economy and Strategic environment. Identifying any key opportunities for strategic alignment with Look North Strategy. Adding insight and depth to findings from meetings and workshops being undertaken in the Look North Project. Providing the basis for conceiving a strategic framework for Look North that takes into account other existing strategies. As such, this is not a detailed analysis. Rather, it presents high level overviews of some key documents provided to the reviewer or found through online research into identified fields of interest. It then asks ‘So what?’, as in what does this mean for the Look North project? It also seeks to identify any evident opportunities or synergies. In some cases, information sought or requested could not be found or provided, so there are gaps in this review, in particular: Information on propensity and patterns of entrepreneurship, such as data on rate of start-ups, patent registrations etc. Northern Manitoba Education Strategy – none provided or found. Information on the make-up and value of the First Nations & Metis economies. These are all key areas of interest to Northern Manitoba Economic Development requiring further research. 3.0 OVERVIEW OF FINDINGS The key thing this review has highlighted is that the region is awash with strategy of varying degrees of action orientation, it also highlights the growing problem that needs solving with large industry decline coupled with large indigenous and youth population growth, and a growing income gap that will only grow further unless this trajectory is altered through timely effective intervention. While many of the strategies allude to a need for more data to enable better strategy and decision making, many of them ignore the reality of who the ‘performing entities’ will be for implementation and their involvement in strategy formulation. So, while the region is awash with strategy, most of it serves to reinforce an over-arching picture of disconnects. The majority of strategy reviewed is focussed on the ‘enablers’ of economic development, rather than the ‘doers’ i.e. those who will directly apply capital, resources and time into growth. What this review has done is provide ‘food for thought’ in how a Northern Strategy might be framed as a companion to some of the other key programs and initiatives in the northern strategic landscape. In particular, it highlights four key areas of distinct need and opportunity; Government, development of an NGO & Social Enterprise Sector, support of Local Enterprise development for local needs, growth and innovation of existing major industries and green fields new market development. There is a clear dual enterprise need; social & commercial. This dual social and commercial enterprise need is illustrated here as a framework with some system logic to it, as a basis for further exploration. DRAFT 4 GOVERNMENT e.g. e.g. COMMERCIAL •Local employment • Mining Industry •Health & social ENTERPRISE targets. Grow th. services provision. • Exist ing indust ry & •Procurement policy. • Canadian KRAFT • Satellite departments business growth and • Decentralization of Paper asset •% targets for local 4 innovation. services to North. optimization & eco- contractors. • Market led enterprise • Invest in local system innovation. • Duty to consult •New Industry solut ions. •New Industry enablement. development / • Policy & Regulatory development / tech • Geological Survey diversification. enablement. sect or. 1 3 e.g. NGOs & SOCIAL LOCAL ENTERPRISE e.g • First Nations NGOs to ENTERPISE • Local enterprise for • Start-ups deliver public services. • Development of NGOs local needs. •Housing •Fund local Social to deliver essential • Local service industry. •Tourism Enterprise solutions to services; healt h, social, 2 •Essential services. • Food production and problems government education & housing. •Tourism. retail. struggle to tackle e.g. • Local solut ions for • Local industry Eco- • Repairs & Maintenance suicide prevention.