Mediterranean Fishes 2000 a Modern Taxonomic Checklist
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1 a Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark
A Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark (Carcharhinus longimanus) as an Endangered, or Alternatively as a Threatened, Species Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act and for the Concurrent Designation of Critical Habitat Oceanic whitetip shark (used with permission from Andy Murch/Elasmodiver.com). Submitted to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce acting through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Marine Fisheries Service September 21, 2015 By: Defenders of Wildlife1 535 16th Street, Suite 310 Denver, CO 80202 Phone: (720) 943-0471 (720) 942-0457 [email protected] [email protected] 1 Defenders of Wildlife would like to thank Courtney McVean, a law student at the University of Denver, Sturm college of Law, for her substantial research and work preparing this Petition. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 II. GOVERNING PROVISIONS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ............................................. 5 A. Species and Distinct Population Segments ....................................................................... 5 B. Significant Portion of the Species’ Range ......................................................................... 6 C. Listing Factors ....................................................................................................................... 7 D. 90-Day and 12-Month Findings ........................................................................................ -
A Hitchhiker Guide to Manta Rays: Patterns of Association Between Mobula Alfredi, M
Turner, K. M. E. (2021). A hitchhiker guide to manta rays: patterns of association between Mobula alfredi, M. birostris, their symbionts, and other fishes in the Maldives. PLoS ONE, 16(7), [e0253704]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253704 Peer reviewed version License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1371/journal.pone.0253704 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Public Library of Science at 10.1371/journal.pone.0253704. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ A hitchhiker guide to manta rays: patterns of association between Mobula alfredi, M. birostris, their symbionts, and other fishes in the Maldives Aimee E. Nicholson-Jack 1,2¶*, Joanna L. Harris 1,3¶, Kirsty Ballard1&, Katy M. E. Turner2& and Guy M. W. Stevens 1¶ 1 The Manta Trust, Catemwood House, Norwood Lane, Corscombe, Dorset, UK 2 School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK 3 School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, UK *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected] (AENJ) ¶These authors contributed equally to this work. &These authors also contributed equally to this work. -
Prioritized Species for Mariculture in India
Prioritized Species for Mariculture in India Compiled & Edited by Ritesh Ranjan Muktha M Shubhadeep Ghosh A Gopalakrishnan G Gopakumar Imelda Joseph ICAR - Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Post Box No. 1603, Ernakulam North P.O. Kochi – 682 018, Kerala, India www.cmfri.org.in 2017 Prioritized Species for Mariculture in India Published by: Dr. A Gopalakrishnan Director ICAR - Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Post Box No. 1603, Ernakulam North P.O. Kochi – 682 018, Kerala, India www.cmfri.org.in Email: [email protected] Tel. No.: +91-0484-2394867 Fax No.: +91-0484-2394909 Designed at G.K. Print House Pvt. Ltd. Rednam Gardens Visakhapatnam- 530002, Andhra Pradesh Cell: +91 9848196095, www.gkprinthouse.com Cover page design: Abhilash P. R., CMFRI, Kochi Illustrations: David K. M., CMFRI, Kochi Publication, Production & Co-ordination: Library & Documentation Centre, CMFRI Printed on: November 2017 ISBN 978-93-82263-14-2 © 2017 ICAR - Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi All rights reserved. Material contained in this publication may not be reproduced in any form without the permission of the publisher. Citation : Ranjan, R., Muktha, M., Ghosh, S., Gopalakrishnan, A., Gopakumar, G. and Joseph, I. (Eds.). 2017. Prioritized Species for Mariculture in India. ICAR-CMFRI, Kochi. 450 pp. CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................................. i Preface ................................................................................................................. -
Fiftee N Vertebrate Beginnings the Chordates
Hickman−Roberts−Larson: 15. Vertebrate Beginnings: Text © The McGraw−Hill Animal Diversity, Third The Chordates Companies, 2002 Edition 15 chapter •••••• fifteen Vertebrate Beginnings The Chordates It’s a Long Way from Amphioxus Along the more southern coasts of North America, half buried in sand on the seafloor,lives a small fishlike translucent animal quietly filtering organic particles from seawater.Inconspicuous, of no commercial value and largely unknown, this creature is nonetheless one of the famous animals of classical zoology.It is amphioxus, an animal that wonderfully exhibits the four distinctive hallmarks of the phylum Chordata—(1) dorsal, tubular nerve cord overlying (2) a supportive notochord, (3) pharyngeal slits for filter feeding, and (4) a postanal tail for propulsion—all wrapped up in one creature with textbook simplicity. Amphioxus is an animal that might have been designed by a zoologist for the classroom. During the nineteenth century,with inter- est in vertebrate ancestry running high, amphioxus was considered by many to resemble closely the direct ancestor of the vertebrates. Its exalted position was later acknowledged by Philip Pope in a poem sung to the tune of “Tipperary.”It ends with the refrain: It’s a long way from amphioxus It’s a long way to us, It’s a long way from amphioxus To the meanest human cuss. Well,it’s good-bye to fins and gill slits And it’s welcome lungs and hair, It’s a long, long way from amphioxus But we all came from there. But amphioxus’place in the sun was not to endure.For one thing,amphioxus lacks one of the most important of vertebrate charac- teristics,a distinct head with special sense organs and the equipment for shifting to an active predatory mode of life. -
Phylum Chordata-Fishes
Phylum Chordata: Vertebrates The Fish Classes Introduction eg. lampreys, hagfish, salmon, trout, sharks, rays, tuna, sardines, flounder, seahorses, catfish, etc etc fish are the most diverse and successful group of living vertebrates almost half of all vertebrate species ~28,000 living species ~200 new species described each year while fish are by far the most abundant and diverse of all vertebrate groups they remain the least known group of vertebrates eg. estimates are that we have collected and described only slightly over 1/3rd of fish species in the Amazon river basin _________________________________________ fish are also the oldest known vertebrates the first true vertebrates appeared in the fossil record 530 MY ago (early Cambrian) a fossil shark species from 310 MY ago was the first vertebrate known to migrate Animals: Chordates - Fishes; Ziser Lecture Notes, 2015.11 1 it lived in rivers but swam to the sea to breed the first fish appeared over 500 MY ago and were small bottom-dwelling animals without jaws, teeth, or paired fins probably sucked up small particles of food from the bottom sediments for ~50 M years they were the ONLY vertebrates on earth they eventually developed primitive fins that improved their swimming ability they also developed heavy bony armor and roamed in this form for over 20 MY eventually most fish lost the heavy armor, developed more streamlined bodies, jaws and paired fins this “modern” design produced almost all the varieties of fish we have today _______________________________________ all fish are aquatic & and highly adapted for aquatic life: fish occupy virtually every kind of freshwater and saltwater habitat Animals: Chordates - Fishes; Ziser Lecture Notes, 2015.11 2 there are no terrestrial fish although some can survive considerable time outside of water and can often be found crawling on land eg. -
We Have Overfished the Seas Systematically Everywhere We Have Gone
©J. Stafford/Deitch/GLOBIO.org ©J. Stafford/Deitch/GLOBIO.org “We have overfished the seas systematically everywhere we have gone. We must act now, not 20 years from now . if we are to prevent further degradation of the marine environment.” —Elliot Norse, President, Marine Conservation Biology Institute Windows on the Wild: Oceans of Life Case Study Sharks Read a recent article about sharks and you'll probably come away convinced that your next ocean swim will end with a deadly attack. But what those articles don’t always say is that sharks rarely attack people. What’s more, the frightening reports obscure a much bigger issue: Shark populations are actually declining rapidly worldwide. In this case study, your students will learn more about the diversity of shark species, the causes and costs of their decline, and the way attitudes and values of people around the world influence shark conservation. World Wildlife Fund WWF-Canon/Catherine Holloway “Despite their fierce image, sharks are among the most vulnerable creatures in the ocean.” —Ocean Conservancy Windows on the Wild: Oceans of Life Background Information t’s a hot summer day at the beach. Ready to cool off, you wade into the ocean and dip under the waves. You swim five, ten, twenty feet. And then it I happens. For a split second, you think about sharks. What if a giant killer is lurking in the dark waters beneath you? What if you see a triangular fin heading your way? Your heart thumps and your spine tingles. Even though you know you shouldn’t be so afraid, there’s no fighting your imagination now. -
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION 13-24 August
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION 13-24 August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE EFFECTS OF FISHING IN THE WESTERN & CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN: PRODUCTIVITY-SUSCEPTIBILITY ANALYSIS WCPFC-SC3-EB SWG/WP-1 Paper prepared by David Seán Kirby1 & Alistair Hobday2 1Oceanic Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community Nouméa, New Caledonia 2Pelagic Fisheries and Ecosystems CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric Research Hobart, Tasmania, Australia - 2 - 1. Background & Introduction The First Regular Session of the WCPFC Scientific Committee (SC1) endorsed the suggestion (Molony 2005, Kirby et al. 2005) that Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) be carried out for the WCPFC Convention Area. SPC-OFP undertook a preliminary ERA (Kirby & Molony 2006) based on the CSIRO/AFMA approach (Hobday et al. 2006). These results were presented to the Second Regular Session of the WCPFC Scientific Committee (SC2), who called for the continuation of this work. In December 2006 the Commission approved its budget for 2007 and a collaborative proposal to carry out the ERA work was then developed between SPC-OFP and CSIRO, Australia. This included the intention to hold an ERA Research Planning Workshop involving technical experts and relevant NGOs, and to prepare a 3 yr ERA Research Plan for submission to SC3. This proposal was subject to peer review and the WCPFC Secretariat gave their approval in March 2008. The analysis presented here is therefore a work-in-progress and there remains room for improvement in data quality/quantity and the resolution and complexity of the analyses. Nonetheless, what is presented illustrates the utilty of Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) in supporting the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAFM) and in assisting CCMs and the SC to meet their obligations under the WCPFC Convention. -
Conserving the Iconic and Highly Threatened Mahseer Fishes of South and Southeast Asia
CONSERVING THE ICONIC AND HIGHLY THREATENED MAHSEER FISHES OF SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA ADRIAN C. PINDER A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Bournemouth University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Bournemouth University March 2020 The copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis CONSERVING THE ICONIC AND HIGHLY THREATENED MAHSEER FISHES OF SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA Adrian C. Pinder ABSTRACT This thesis and supporting papers constitute the submission for an award of a PhD research degree by publication and consists of a cohesive synthesis linking a total of eight published papers across seven peer review journals and an IUCN Red List assessment. The mahseers (Tor spp.) represent an iconic group of large-bodied cyprinid fishes found throughout the fast-flowing rivers of South and Southeast Asia. Due to the considerable religious, cultural and recreational significance of these fishes, and the anthropogenic pressures they face, they are of high conservation concern and represent flagship and umbrella focal species for the sustainable management of river systems throughout their biogeographic range. Based on research conducted since 2012, considerable advances in the taxonomic and human dimension aspects of mahseer conservation have been acheived. Engagement with the recreational angling community has demonstrated the high value, and future potential for this rapidly expanding stakeholder group to impact positively on the conservation of mahseer and rivers more generally. -
Synopsis of the Biological Data on Dolphin Fishes, Coryphaena
Technical Report NMFS Circular 443 6psis of the BîoIogica Data on DoIphn-Fishes, oryphaena hippurus Linnaeus and Coryphaena equiselis innaeus Apr1982 FAO Fishei os Synopsis.No. 1:30 N MFS/S i 00 ST - Corypha&na tnppuws: 1.70.200 12 (,)ypI1,aeqwse/ss: 1.70.28.071.02 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Nation& Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular 443 Synopsis of the gcd / n Data on Dolphin-Fishes, Coryphaena hippurus Lind and Coryphaen, lis '4Ñ7ENT 0F C.°' Lin nae! Barbara Jayne Palko, Grant L. Beardsley, and William J. Richards April 1982 FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 130 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration John V. Byrne, Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service William G. Gordon, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, rec- onimend or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to NMFS, or to this publication furnished by NMFS, in any advertising or sales pro- motion which would indicate or imply that NMFS approves, recommends or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this NMFS publication. CONTENTS 1 Identity 1.1Nomenclature 1 1.11 Validname 1.12 Objective synonymy 1.2 Taxonomy 1.21 Affinities 1 1.22 Taxonomic -
A Revision of Irvine's Marine Fishes of Tropical West Africa
A Revision of Irvine’s Marine Fishes of Tropical West Africa by ALASDAIR J. EDWARDS Tropical Coastal Management Studies, Department of Marine Sciences and Coastal Management, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom ANTHONY C. GILL Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom and PARCY O. ABOHWEYERE, Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, Wilmot Point Road, Bar-Beach, P.M.B. 12729, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................1 SHARKS AND RAYS (EUSELACHII) .......................................................................................4 Sixgill and Sevengill sharks (Hexanchidae) ......................................................................................4 Sand tiger sharks (Odontaspididae) .................................................................................................5 Mackerel sharks (Lamnidae) .........................................................................................................5 Thresher Sharks (Alopiidae) ..........................................................................................................7 Nurse sharks (Ginglymostomatidae) ...............................................................................................7 Requiem sharks (Carcharhinidae) ...................................................................................................8 -
Download Full PDF Version
GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN ISSN 1020-9549 STUDIES AND REVIEWS No. 77 2006 For years, the impoverishment of artisanal fishery in Mediterranean countries has been INVENTORY OF ARTISANAL FISHERY COMMUNITIES frequently reported at all levels when the urgency for intervention was systematically IN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL MEDITERRANEAN highlighted. In addition, it has also been reiterated that, at present, there is not enough knowledge either of the primary and secondary magnitudes of artisanal fishery or of the normative and managerial tools that cover the entire spectrum of competence. Information on artisanal fishery, in the wide sense, is fundamental for planning and management purposes. It is, therefore, extremely important to document all the elements that influence and interact directly or indirectly with artisanal fisheries (e.g. synergies, conflicts or friction, possible interaction and connection, etc.). During the project Cooperation Networks to Facilitate Coordination to Support Fisheries Management in the Western and Central Mediterranean (COPEMED), the first-ever inventory of regional artisanal fishery communities in the Central and Western Mediterranean was implemented. This was possible through direct assistance to some member countries to develop and improve their capacity to collect and analyse information on artisanal fisheries. The inventory resulted in a comprehensive list of all the fishing communities performing artisanal fisheries in the region, including their localization, description, use, pictures and other ancillary information. This exercise, based on 13 582 sites visited (interviewed), produced 11 papers, involved 16 scientists (regional and national), and also collected a selected bibliography of about 200 documents. Most of the results are presented in this paper. -
Irish Biodiversity: a Taxonomic Inventory of Fauna
Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna Irish Wildlife Manual No. 38 Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna S. E. Ferriss, K. G. Smith, and T. P. Inskipp (editors) Citations: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Section author (2009) Section title . In: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photos: © Kevin G. Smith and Sarah E. Ferriss Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: N. Kingston and F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 - 6670 Inventory of Irish fauna ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Methodology........................................................................................................................................................................3