The Science of Religion in Britain, 1860–1915 Victorian Literature and Culture Series Jerome J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Science of Religion in Britain, 1860–1915 Victorian Literature and Culture Series Jerome J The Science of Religion in Britain, 1860–1915 Victorian Literature and Culture Series Jerome J. McGann and Herbert F. Tucker, Editors The Science of Religion in Britain, 1860–1915 Marjorie Wheeler-Barclay University of Virginia Press | Charlottesville and London University of Virginia Press ∫ 2010 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper First published 2010 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wheeler-Barclay, Marjorie, 1952– The science of religion in Britain, 1860–1915 / Marjorie Wheeler-Barclay. p. cm. — (Victorian literature and culture series) Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. isbn 978-0-8139-3010-7 (cloth : alk. paper) — isbn 978-0-8139-3051-0 (e-book) 1. Religion—Study and teaching—Great Britain—History—19th century. 2. Religion historians—Great Britain—History—19th century. 3. Religion—Study and teaching—Great Britain—History—20th century. 4. Religion historians—Great Britain—History—20th century. I. Title. bl41.w467 2010 306.60941%09034—dc22 2010007703 For Daryl and Reese This page intentionally left blank Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 1. The Study of Religion before 1860 17 2. Friedrich Max Müller The Annunciation of a New Science 37 3. Edward B. Tylor The Forging of an Anthropological Orthodoxy 71 4. Andrew Lang The Antipositivist Critique 104 5. William Robertson Smith A New Departure 140 6. James G. Frazer The Orthodoxy Monumentalized 181 7. Jane Ellen Harrison The Redefinition of Religion 215 Conclusion 243 Notes 257 Bibliography 289 Index 305 This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgments In the course of writing this study I have received essential support— intellectual, financial, and emotional—from many individuals and institu- tions. It is a pleasure to attempt here to acknowledge some of these debts. T. W. Heyck guided and advised me through the first stages of this project many years ago, and his support and thoughtful criticisms were invaluable. Many friends and colleagues encouraged me to persevere at times when I doubted that this project would ever come to completion. I particularly wish to thank Trent Foley, Carl Hester, Heidi Kunz, Jamie Rohrer, Melinda Wheeler, and Sarah Wheeler. My colleagues in the Department of History at Randolph College—Brad Geisert, Gerry Sherayko, John d’Entremont, and the late Margaret Pertzoff—have extended support, friendship, and encour- agement over more than twenty years. Original research for this study was generously funded by the Alumnae of Northwestern University, and I am grateful to Randolph College for profes- sional development grants and sabbatical leaves that allowed me to continue the research for this book. Thanks also to librarians and archivists at North- western University, Randolph College, the British Library, the Bodleian Li- brary, Trinity College and Newnham College in Cambridge, the Pitt Rivers Museum, the Cambridge University Library, Senate House Library at the University of London, and the University of St. Andrews. I wish to thank the following institutions for permission to quote from material held in their collections: the Principal and Fellows, Newnham Col- lege, Cambridge; the Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford; Bodleian Library, University of Oxford; Archives, Imperial College London; and the x | Acknowledgments Syndics of Cambridge University Library. Portions of chapter 5 were pre- viously published in ‘‘Victorian Evangelicalism and the Sociology of Religion: The Career of William Robertson Smith,’’ which appeared in Journal of the History of Ideas 54, no. 1 (January 1993), copyright 1993, the Journal of the History of Ideas, Inc., published by the Johns Hopkins University Press. Thanks also go to my editors at the University of Virginia Press, Cathie Brettschneider and Mark Mones, for their support and good advice. My greatest debt is to my husband, Daryl, who has always demonstrated serene faith in my ability to complete this book even when my own con- fidence wavered. The Science of Religion in Britain, 1860–1915 This page intentionally left blank Introduction Yet how much more safe it is, as well as more fruitful, to look for the main confirmation of a religion in its intrinsic correspondence with urgent wants of human nature, in its profound necessity! Differing reli- gions will then be found to have much in common. Matthew Arnold, ‘‘A Persian Passion Play’’ All the great religions of the world historically considered, are rightly the objects of deep reverence and sympathy. Every community met to worship the highest Good . carries me along in its main current, and if there were not reasons against my following such an inclination, I should go to church or chapel constantly for the sake of the delightful emotions of fellowship which come over me in religious assemblies. George Eliot, Letter to John Walter Cross, 1873 Loss of faith in traditional Christian beliefs and the accompanying erosion of the intellectual and cultural authority of the churches have long been central problems in the history of Victorian Britain. Historians have approached the topic from several angles, examining the complex causes and sources of un- belief, pursuing an understanding of its impact through biographical studies of famous ‘‘doubters,’’ and more recently, turning to the investigation of surro- gate religions such as spiritualism, eugenics, and the Comtean ‘‘religion of humanity.’’ One problem that has so far attracted little attention, however, is the relationship between this cultural upheaval and the creation of a distinct field of discourse dedicated to the scientific study of religious practices and belief systems as human institutions meeting definite social and psychological needs. This scholarly enterprise, variously known as the ‘‘science of religion,’’ 2 | Introduction ‘‘comparative religions,’’ or the ‘‘history of religions,’’ flourished in Britain from about 1860 up to the early years of World War I. The notion that religion was an appropriate subject for disinterested scholarly investigation was not, of course, original to the nineteenth century. Nevertheless, the period after 1860 witnessed an unprecedented burst of activity in this area as the first attempts were made to create a coherent field of study that would treat religion purely as an element in human cultures. This new field was both a response to and a reflection of the sense of religious crisis that troubled so many Victorians. This study seeks to illuminate the connections between Victorian culture and the science of religion through an examination of the lives and work of six individuals—Friedrich Max Müller, Edward B. Tylor, Andrew Lang, William Robertson Smith, James G. Frazer, and Jane Ellen Harrison—all of whom were major contributors to this new field. Other authors who contributed significantly to the field include Herbert Spencer, Edward Clodd, J. F. McLen- nan, John Lubbock, and R. R. Marett. The science of religion did not achieve the status of an autonomous academic discipline during the nineteenth cen- tury, and these figures are part of the history of several different fields, includ- ing anthropology, sociology, classics, and Oriental studies. Like much of Vic- torian thought, the science of religion drew contributions from outside as well as within the universities. Unlike many of their twentieth- and twenty-first- century successors, these scholars did not confine their investigations to any single cultural tradition, although Max Müller and Robertson Smith spe- cialized in ‘‘Oriental’’ religions while Harrison, Frazer, and Lang began from their interests in classics. But an exclusive focus on one tradition would not have served their purpose, which was to arrive at some understanding of religion as a unitary phenomenon expressing pervasive (though not neces- sarily permanent) human needs. Theirs was a truly engaged scholarship. Though they concentrated atten- tion on non-Christian religions, especially so-called primitive ones, their work was intended as a vital contribution to the contemporary debate on Chris- tianity.∞ Their scholarly interests reflected the questions and anxieties gener- ated by the intensity of religious debate that surrounded them, and this study argues that their work is best regarded not as a cause of, but as a response to, the sense of cultural disorientation that was engendered by religious turmoil. Furthermore, despite the assumptions of many Victorians, as well as later observers, that any enterprise described as ‘‘scientific’’ must be hostile to religion, the fact is that the science of religion was not purely or even mainly antireligious, though contributors to it were often at odds with what many of their contemporaries would have regarded as Christian orthodoxy. Introduction | 3 During the first half of the nineteenth century, Britain’s educated classes were united in some degree by a religious and moral consensus based on the varieties of British Protestantism. To be sure, religion also provided a fertile source of social and political conflict as a newly self-conscious middle class, many of whose members were Dissenters, launched a series of assaults on the powers and privileges of the established Church while adherents of the Ox- ford Movement sought to counter the influence of the Evangelicals. Broadly speaking, the first half of the Victorian era was marked by sporadic religious conflict that, while often quite intense, was basically sectarian in character. Although it was not
Recommended publications
  • Papers of Beatrice Mary Blackwood (1889–1975) Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford
    PAPERS OF BEATRICE MARY BLACKWOOD (1889–1975) PITT RIVERS MUSEUM, UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD Compiled by B. Asbury and M. Peckett, 2013-15 Box 1 Correspondence A-D Envelope A (Box 1) 1. Letter from TH Ainsworth of the City Museum, Vancouver, Canada, to Beatrice Blackwood, 20 May 1955. Summary: Acknowledging receipt of the Pitt Rivers Report for 1954. “The Museum as an institution seems beset with more difficulties than any other.” Giving details of the developing organisation of the Vancouver Museum and its index card system. Asking for a copy of Mr Bradford’s BBC talk on the “Lost Continent of Atlantis”. Notification that Mr Menzies’ health has meant he cannot return to work at the Museum. 2pp. 2. Letter from TH Ainsworth of the City Museum, Vancouver, Canada, to Beatrice Blackwood, 20 July 1955. Summary: Thanks for the “Lost Continent of Atlantis” information. The two Museums have similar indexing problems. Excavations have been resumed at the Great Fraser Midden at Marpole under Dr Borden, who has dated the site to 50 AD using Carbon-14 samples. 2pp. 3. Letter from TH Ainsworth of the City Museum, Vancouver, Canada, to Beatrice Blackwood, 12 June 1957. Summary: Acknowledging the Pitt Rivers Museum Annual Report. News of Mr Menzies and his health. The Vancouver Museum is expanding into enlarged premises. “Until now, the City Museum has truly been a cultural orphan.” 1pp. 4. Letter from TH Ainsworth of the City Museum, Vancouver, Canada, to Beatrice Blackwood, 16 June 1959. Summary: Acknowledging the Pitt Rivers Museum Annual Report. News of Vancouver Museum developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Words of the World: a Global History of the Oxford English Dictionary
    DOWNLOAD CSS Notes, Books, MCQs, Magazines www.thecsspoint.com Download CSS Notes Download CSS Books Download CSS Magazines Download CSS MCQs Download CSS Past Papers The CSS Point, Pakistan’s The Best Online FREE Web source for All CSS Aspirants. Email: [email protected] BUY CSS / PMS / NTS & GENERAL KNOWLEDGE BOOKS ONLINE CASH ON DELIVERY ALL OVER PAKISTAN Visit Now: WWW.CSSBOOKS.NET For Oder & Inquiry Call/SMS/WhatsApp 0333 6042057 – 0726 540316 Words of the World Most people think of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) as a distinctly British product. Begun in England 150 years ago, it took more than 60 years to complete, and when it was finally finished in 1928, the British prime minister heralded it as a ‘national treasure’. It maintained this image throughout the twentieth century, and in 2006 the English public voted it an ‘Icon of England’, alongside Marmite, Buckingham Palace, and the bowler hat. But this book shows that the dictionary is not as ‘British’ as we all thought. The linguist and lexicographer, Sarah Ogilvie, combines her insider knowledge and experience with impeccable research to show that the OED is in fact an international product in both its content and its making. She examines the policies and practices of the various editors, applies qualitative and quantitative analysis, and finds new OED archival materials in the form of letters, reports, and proofs. She demonstrates that the OED,in its use of readers from all over the world and its coverage of World English, is in fact a global text. sarah ogilvie is Director of the Australian National Dictionary Centre, Reader in Linguistics at the Australian National University, and Chief Editor of Oxford Dictionaries, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • A British Reflection: the Relationship Between Dante's Comedy and The
    A British Reflection: the Relationship between Dante’s Comedy and the Italian Fascist Movement and Regime during the 1920s and 1930s with references to the Risorgimento. Keon Esky A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. University of Sydney 2016 KEON ESKY Fig. 1 Raffaello Sanzio, ‘La Disputa’ (detail) 1510-11, Fresco - Stanza della Segnatura, Palazzi Pontifici, Vatican. KEON ESKY ii I dedicate this thesis to my late father who would have wanted me to embark on such a journey, and to my partner who with patience and love has never stopped believing that I could do it. KEON ESKY iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis owes a debt of gratitude to many people in many different countries, and indeed continents. They have all contributed in various measures to the completion of this endeavour. However, this study is deeply indebted first and foremost to my supervisor Dr. Francesco Borghesi. Without his assistance throughout these many years, this thesis would not have been possible. For his support, patience, motivation, and vast knowledge I shall be forever thankful. He truly was my Virgil. Besides my supervisor, I would like to thank the whole Department of Italian Studies at the University of Sydney, who have patiently worked with me and assisted me when I needed it. My sincere thanks go to Dr. Rubino and the rest of the committees that in the years have formed the panel for the Annual Reviews for their insightful comments and encouragement, but equally for their firm questioning, which helped me widening the scope of my research and accept other perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Beatrice Blackwood and Leonard Dudley Buxton's Work in Oxfordshire
    History of Anthropology Newsletter Volume 35 Issue 1 June 2008 Article 3 January 2008 Measuring the Natives: Beatrice Blackwood and Leonard Dudley Buxton's Work in Oxfordshire Alison Petch Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Petch, Alison (2008) "Measuring the Natives: Beatrice Blackwood and Leonard Dudley Buxton's Work in Oxfordshire," History of Anthropology Newsletter: Vol. 35 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol35/iss1/3 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol35/iss1/3 For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY NEWSLETIER 35.1 (JUNE 2008) / 3 Measuring the Natives: Beatrice Blackwood and Leonard Dudley Buxton's work in Oxfordshire Alison Petch, Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford I have been engaged for some years on research projects examining the history of the Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) at the University of Oxford and its collections.[ 1] Recently, I have been examining the English collections held at this ethnographic museum in close detail, as part of the UK Economic and Social Research Council-funded project, "The Other Within." [2] Although the findings reported in this paper have turned out to be only tangentially related to my main research subject, they provide insight into one form of anthropological fieldwork at the University of Oxford in the UK in the 1920s and 1930s. This work was related to philosophical and scientific debates widespread at that time, not only in academia but also in politics: all over Europe, scholars, politicians and members of the general public were increasingly interested in nationalism, defining "native populations" and historical antecedents.
    [Show full text]
  • Magical Practices and Discourses of Magic in Early Christian Traditions: Jesus, Peter, and Paul
    MAGICAL PRACTICES AND DISCOURSES OF MAGIC IN EARLY CHRISTIAN TRADITIONS: JESUS, PETER, AND PAUL Shaily Shashikant Patel A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Religious Studies (Ancient Mediterranean Religions). Chapel Hill 2017 Approved by: Bart D. Ehrman Zlatko Pleše Randall Styers Jessica A. Boon James B. Rives ©2017 Shaily Shashikant Patel ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Shaily Shashikant Patel: Magical Practices and Discourses of Magic in Early Christian Traditions: Jesus, Peter, and Paul (Under the direction of Bart D. Ehrman) This project represents a methodological intervention in the study of magic in early Christianity. Modern scholars have overwhelmingly adopted post-Enlightenment, exclusively discursive understandings of magic with which to approach ancient evidence. That is to say, contemporary historians believe that the ancient Christians crafted magic in the charge against theological opponents. As a result, magic was a concept empty of all content until it was levied against others. In contrast, the following study attempts to show that while magic was a discursive category in the ancient Graeco-Roman world, certain practices attendant to this discourse demonstrated relative stability. Some activities were more likely to convey the charge of magic than others. Practices like reanimation-necromancy and love spells tended to be associated with magic more often than practices like healing or exorcism. These areas of dynamism and fixity have wide-ranging implications for the study of early Christian magic. Rather than understanding early Christians as either participating in magic or not, the following project shows how Christians crafted their distinctive magical tradition along two indices: the narration of magical practices and the subsequent interpretation of these practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Fig. 1 Oxford's First Anthropology Diploma Class. Bad:: Row; Wilson Wahis, Diamond Jcnness, Manus Barbcau
    fig. 1 Oxford's First Anthropology Diploma class. Bad:: row; Wilson WaHis, Diamond Jcnness, Manus Barbcau. Front row; Henry Balfour, Anhur Thomson, R.R. Marett. (Photo; Cl Canadian Museum of Civilization, Marius Barbeau Collection, imageJ5337) 62 VITALISM IN CANAD~S ANTHROPOLOGY AND ART Barbeau's Early Twentieth-Centurr. Connection to Modernist Painters, Especially Emily Carr The interrelation of totem poles and modern paintings displayed in close proximity made it clear that the inspiration for both kinds of art expression sprang from the same fundamental background. Marius Barbeau, 1932 1 ome of Canada's early twentieth-century museum-based anthropologists Spromoted vitalist notions in their new social science discipline, attempting to "humanize" the rigours of working within an emerging field modeled on the natural sciences. In the case of Marius Barbeau (1883-1969), vitalism seems to have significantly facilitated his collaborations with various Canadian modernist artists.2 Not only did Barbeau understand and valorize their work in vitalist terms, but the artists themselves seem to have been in accord, to some extent, with a variety of vitalist concepts about matter, memory and re-presentation. Jennifer Hecht has described how vitalism resurged strongly in late nineteenth­ century France in reaction against scientific explanations of life, when many people decided that: the phenomena of life and consciousness are not explicable through physics, chemistry, and biology: something sort of spiritual is going on. Vitalism instead posits
    [Show full text]
  • Shamanism and the Issue of Religion
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87353-6 - An Introduction to Shamanism Thomas A. DuBois Excerpt More information part i Introductions © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87353-6 - An Introduction to Shamanism Thomas A. DuBois Excerpt More information chapter 1 Shamanism and the issue of religion On a blustery winter morning on the campus of a major American research university, I have the opportunity to sit with a unique individual. Thai is an undergraduate anthropology student with a second major in South- east Asian studies. He is also a txiv neeb, what scholars of religion term a shaman. Thai is a member of Wisconsin’s numerous and thriving Hmong community, a set of people who relocated to the United States from their homeland in Laos starting in the mid-1970s, in the aftermath of the Vietnam War. In Laos, Hmong people lived in mountainous areas, and combined traditional hunting and gathering practices with small-scale agriculture and livestock husbandry. Much has changed in their rebuilding of lives in the United States, but some things remain the same. One of these, at least in Thai’s view, is the crucial relation that exists between Hmong people and an unseen but highly influential spirit world. As a txiv neeb, Thai is a specialist in these relations, a traveler between the visible world of the everyday and a profoundly different and powerful unseen. Through a set of rituals that hold psychic and physical dangers for the practitioner, Thai travels that spirit world, pursuing, confronting, cajoling, and confounding spirit entities on behalf of his clients and community.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociologia Religiei
    PROLEGOMENE METODOLOGICE 1 COLLEGIUM Sociologie, {tiin]e politice 2 SOCIOLOGIA RELIGIEI Seria Sociologie, {tiin]e politice este coordonat\ de Adrian Neculau, Liviu Antonesei (sociologie) [i Dan Pavel ([tiin]e politice) Joachim Wach, Sociology of Religion, 1944 Copyright © 1997 by POLIROM Co S.A. Ia[i, pentru prezenta edi]ie Editura POLIROM, B-dul Copou nr. 3 P.O. BOX 266, 6600, Ia[i, ROMÂNIA Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Na]ionale : Wach, Joachim Sociologia religiei / Joachim Wach 256 p. ; 165 × 235 mm. (Collegium. Sociologie) ISBN: 973-9248-76-4 CIP : 316 : 2 Printed in ROMANIA Lucrare editat\ cu sprijinul Funda]iei Soros pentru o Societate Deschis\ PROLEGOMENE METODOLOGICE 3 Joachim Wach SOCIOLOGIA RELIGIEI Traducere de Florin Iorga Studiu introductiv de Nicu Gavrilu]\ POLIROM, Ia[i, 1997 4 SOCIOLOGIA RELIGIEI PROLEGOMENE METODOLOGICE 5 Cuprins Tabel bibliografic ............................................................................... 9 Studiu introductiv ............................................................................. 13 I. Joachim Wach [i studiul [tiin]ific al religiilor ................................. 13 II. Sociologia charismei [i autorit\]ii religioase. Aspecte contemporane..... 17 III. Histrionismul contemporan [i Religiile paralele ........................... 33 Cuv^nt `nainte .................................................................................. 35 PARTEA ~NTÂI Prolegomene metodologice CAPITOLUL I. Metoda ........................................................................... 39 1. Metoda
    [Show full text]
  • 'Wow': RR Marett's Notion of Awe and the Study of Religion
    How to capture the ‘wow’: R.R. Marett’s notion of awe and the study of religion Birgit Meyer Utrecht University Current scholarship in the social sciences and humanities, including the study of religion, shows a marked appraisal of bodily sensations, emotions, and experiences as eminently social and politico-aesthetic phenomena (rather than reducing them to a matter of mere individual psychology). How to grasp the genesis of shared perceptions and feelings, and even some kind of ‘wow’ effect, in relation to a posited ‘beyond’ has become a central issue for scholars of religion today. Placed against the horizon of the material turn in the study of religion, R.R. Marett’s approach to religion as an ‘organic complex of thought, emotion, and behaviour’ and his concept of awe gain renewed topicality. Engaging with Marett’s ideas in the context of broader debates about religious experience, in this article (which is based on my 2014 Marett lecture) I call attention to the surplus generated in the interplay of religious things and bodily sensations and explore its role in politics and aesthetics of religious world-making. My central point is that Marett’s work offers valuable resources for an approach to religion that neither takes for granted the existence of a god or transcendental force (as in ontological approaches), nor invests in unmasking it as an illusion (as in critiques of religion as irrational), but instead undertakes a close study of the standardized methods that yield the fabrication of some kind of excess that points to a ‘beyond’ and yet is grounded in the here and now.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Peter Rivière The formal recognition of anthropology’s existence at Oxford University occurred in the spring of 1905 with the promulgation of a statute creating ‘a Committee for the organization of the advanced study of Anthropology, and to establish Diplomas in Anthropology to be granted after examination’ (Oxford University Gazette (hereafter OUG) 1904–5: 536). The Committee for Anthropology, as it was known, met for the first time on 27 October 1905. The year 2005 thus seemed an appropriate and suitable occasion on which to celebrate the centenary of the subject at the University. This volume is composed of the contributions made to a workshop on the history of anthropology at Oxford University which was held in conjunction with the centenary celebrations. For some years I had been planning to write a history of Oxford anthropology with a view to its publication around the date of the centenary. In the event, another major publishing commitment made it clear to me that, as a single-handed project, this was unrealisable. On the other hand, as the plans for a centenary conference developed, a session devoted to the history of Oxford anthropology was included. This volume contains the proceedings of that session held on 16 September 2005. Thus my original intention became a reality on the back of shared labour. I have no doubt that the various contributors, with their different approaches and insights, have brought to the volume a far broader, more many-sided picture than I alone would have achieved. A criticism might be made, and, knowing academics, almost certainly will be, of the choice of contributors; that it is too much an ‘insiders’ history.
    [Show full text]
  • Charisma in Max Weber's Sociology of Religion
    Religion ISSN: 0048-721X (Print) 1096-1151 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rrel20 Charisma in Max Weber's Sociology of Religion Martin Riesebrodt To cite this article: Martin Riesebrodt (1999) Charisma in Max Weber's Sociology of Religion, Religion, 29:1, 1-14, DOI: 10.1006/reli.1999.0175 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/reli.1999.0175 Published online: 22 Feb 2011. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 487 View related articles Citing articles: 11 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rrel20 Download by: [Iliff School of Theology] Date: 20 February 2017, At: 06:25 Religion (1999) 29, 1–14 Article No reli.1999.0175, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Charisma in Max Weber’s Sociology of Religion Martin Riesebrodt Weber’s concept of charisma has received diverse and contradictory interpretations. The essay argues that this diversity is caused less by inadequate readings of Weber than by inconsistencies in Weber’s own conceptualization. Weber introduced his concept of charisma in two diVerent contexts: his political sociology and his sociology of religion. In his political sociology he formulates the ideal type of charismatic authority informed by R. Sohm. In his sociology of religion Weber connects it with the anthropological debate of the turn of the century on magic and religion, especially the debate on pre-animism initiated by R. R. Marett, and uses it as an alternative for concepts like mana or orenda.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Genealogies of Shamanism Boekhoven, J.W
    University of Groningen Genealogies of shamanism Boekhoven, J.W. IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2011 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Boekhoven, J. W. (2011). Genealogies of shamanism: Struggles for power, charisma and authority. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 2 Eighteenth and nineteenth-century interpretations At the beginning of the twentieth century, the Swedish traveller and journalist Jonas Jonsson Stadling (1847-1935) criticised the overwhelming variety of inter- pretations of ‘shamans’ and ‘shamanism’ and, above all, the extraordinary overgen- eralisations of some interpreters: To give a general description of the fundamental traits of the Shamanistic reli- gion is no easy task, because this has to be made out of a chaos of often appar- ently contradictory details, which have not been preserved in written original documents but only in vague and fragmentary second-hand allusions, in con- stantly changing traditions, or in personal observations among the still living adherents of those tenets.1 Stadling’s personal observations made him conclude that ‘shamanism’ was not a term known to those who were supposed to adhere to it.
    [Show full text]