DOCSLIB.ORG

Rio Grande Corridor Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rio Grande Corridor Project A Rio Grande Renaissance Our River’s History, Culture and Diversity City of Las Cruces Rio Grande Riparian Ecological Corridor Project An EPA Sustainable Development Challenge Grant Comprehensive Plan May 17, 2004 Mission of the Rio Grande Corridor Project The Rio Grande Riparian Ecological Corridor Project seeks to create a guide for future development of the Rio Grande corridor which will be sustainable and non-polluting. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements . 3 Executive Summary . 4 I. Introduction. 8 Project History Sustainable Development Planning Process II. Study Area Information. 13 Location History Current Issues and Trends III. Intergovernmental and Interagency Coordination. 19 Stakeholders City of Las Cruces Interdepartmental Roles Project Workgroups National Park Service Rivers and Trails Program Environmental Protection Agency IV. Planning Background. 22 City of Las Cruces Comprehensive Plan Extraterritorial Zone Comprehensive Plan Town of Mesilla Comprehensive Plan USIBWC Rio Grande Canalization Project 1984 Southern Rio Grande Outdoor Recreation Master Plan Mesilla Valley Nature Center Feasibility Study Mesilla Valley Bosque Park Feasibility Study Laws and Regulations Affecting Study Area V. Summary of Data Analysis. 28 Inventory of Current Uses Results of Surveys and Public Input Needs Analysis VI. Goals, Objectives and Recommendations . 33 Introduction Goals, Objectives and Recommendations Funding Mechanisms Conclusion VII. Implementation of Projects . 43 Introduction Long Term Management and Multi-Jurisdictional Responsibility Special Types of Multi-Jurisdictional Management Fundraising Assistance Programs and Other Resources Paseo del Norte Watershed Council Organic Farming and Community Food Projects Pilot Project Implementation Wetland Pilot Component Multi-use Pathway Component VIII. Conclusion . .. 67 IX. Definitions and Acronyms . 68 X. Appendices. .. 69 Rio Grande Riparian Ecological Corridor Project 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Council William Mattiace, Mayor Jose Frietze Dolores Connor Dolores Archuleta Steve Trowbridge Wesley Strain Ken Miyagishima City Administration Jim Ericson City Manager Maryann Ustick Assistant City Manager Brian Denmark Director of Community Development David Carpenter Neighborhood Development & Planning Administrator Carol McCall Project Manager Environmental Protection Agency Diana Hinds EPA Region 6 Project Administrator National Park Service Rivers and Trails Program Paul Cusumano Community Planner Project Participants City of Las Cruces Southwest Environmental Center Elephant Butte Irrigation District New Mexico Department of Game & Fish United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission Bureau of Reclamation Town of Mesilla Dona Ana County Contributing Authors Beth Bardwell Paul Cusumano Kevin Bixby Nancy Stotz Kevin Buggy Rio Grande Riparian Ecological Corridor Project 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Rio Grande Riparian Ecological Corridor Project was created in 2000 through a Sustainable Development Challenge Grant from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA defines sustainable development as “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Planning decisions must consider and account for long-term impacts and consequences, interdependence of economic, environmental and social well-being, the input of the stakeholders who will be affected by decisions, equity among generations and different groups in society, and proactive prevention which promotes efforts to prevent problems as the first course of action. 1 The Rio Grande Corridor Project has three components: a Comprehensive Plan for development along an 11-mile corridor of the Rio Grande; and two pilot projects -- construction of a 14-acre wetland, and construction of a 1.1-mile multi-use pathway. The City of Las Cruces, with assistance from the Southwest Environmental Center (SWEC), the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) and Elephant Butte Irrigation District (EBID), constructed a flow-through wetland which utilizes water from the Picacho Drain. Several acres of Salt Cedar were removed and the area was replanted with native trees and grasses. In coming years, SWEC and EBID will be collecting data to determine whether the removal of salt cedar offsets the use of water in the wetland. The multi-use pathway was constructed with a mixture of crushed rock and a plant-based stabilizer. This mix allows some degree of permeability while ensuring durability. Durability testing will be conducted in the next twelve months to measure how well this paving method holds up under non- motorized vehicular use. These pilot projects complement the larger objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for sustainable development along the corridor by creating opportunities for multi-jurisdictional cooperation and public involvement. As pilot projects, they are intended to provide information which may be useful when considering future projects of a similar nature along the river corridor. The Comprehensive Plan is intended as a blueprint and guide for proposed projects along the corridor which may impact the environment, economic development and quality of life of the region. The Plan suggests many projects which could be carried out by various stakeholders and private land owners in order to accomplish a set of goals created as a result of public input. To create the goals, workgroups were assembled, with representation from principal stakeholders who manage projects along the river and approximately 1 Sustainable Communities Task Force Report,” President’s Council on Sustainable Development, Washington, DC, 1997, page v-vi. Rio Grande Riparian Ecological Corridor Project 4 twenty user groups whose interests specifically relate to the Rio Grande corridor. The workgroups conducted several brain-storming sessions to develop a current inventory and an initial list of needs. Two sets of public input meetings were conducted, during which information was gathered asking what residents would/would not like to have happen along the corridor. The workgroups used this public input to create a more comprehensive needs assessment. From this, they created a list of goals and objectives, which form the basis of the Comprehensive Plan. MAJOR FINDINGS Recent studies have shown that the combined uses of farm, forest and open land more than pay for themselves, costing a community only $.36 for every dollar generated. Unfortunately, Dona Ana County is losing prime farmland to development at an alarming rate, creating deficits by residents’ high demand for public services, particularly education, social services, public health and safety. For every dollar generated, residential areas cost the community $1.15. These studies conclude that on average, residential development is expensive and relies on other land uses to balance municipal budgets. 2 In general, the public is in favor of preserving the Rio Grande Corridor in as natural a state as possible, and would support proposals for open space and agriculture preservation, trails and parks along the river and outside the levee boundaries for up to one-half mile. Among residents, issues related to illegal dumping, safety, codes enforcement and vehicle restrictions are also primary concerns. These are problems which have gone un-mitigated for many years since most stakeholder agencies do not have enforcement arms through which they may be addressed. Unless this changes, Dona Ana County is the likely candidate for enforcement, perhaps with assistance from the City of Las Cruces or a specific state agency, such as the State Parks Division. The Rio Grande Corridor is managed by many stakeholders, all with individual missions and project management practices. In order to carry out projects along the river, multi-jurisdictional cooperation and responsibility is a necessity and must be made a priority. It must be noted, however, that not all stakeholders agree with all goals listed here. In order to carry out any of the projects proposed in this plan, participating agencies must agree on specific project criteria, such that individual stakeholder missions are not compromised. GOALS The workgroups decided upon six goals, with objectives and recommendations by which each goal may be achieved. In brief, these are: 1. Preserve, enhance and restore native riparian and aquatic habitat diversity in limited project areas within the 11-mile corridor. This may be achieved by restoring native vegetation at specific habitat sites on public and private J. Freedgood, Cost of Community Services Studies: Making the Case for Conservation, American Farmland Trust, Washington DC, 2002, p. 13 Rio Grande Riparian Ecological Corridor Project 5 land, and within/outside the floodway, and by obtaining water sources needed to achieve habitat restoration. In addition, support of the Mesilla Valley Bosque Park and the development of management partnerships are recommended. 2. Preserve farmland and open space adjacent to the Rio Grande by supporting various farmland and open space preservation efforts. 3. Create a multi-use trail system for the 11-mile corridor by establishing a design plan that accommodates all types of non-motorized transportation, then constructing an 11-mile uninterrupted main trail the length of the corridor with small spur trails to various points of interest. These trails would be accessible to the greatest extent possible. In addition, make the river corridor experience “safe, sound and sanitary” by establishing an interagency method of management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prehistoric Trackways National Monument Recreation Area Management Plan
    October 2020 Prehistoric Trackways National Monument Recreation Area Management Plan Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NM-L0000-2021-0004-EA Las Cruces District Office 1800 Marquess Street Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005 575-525-4300 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Decision to Be Made ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3. RAMP Planning Process ................................................................................................ 3 1.4. Plan Conformance and Relationship to Statutes and Regulations ............................ 3 1.4.1. Plan Conformance ..................................................................................................... 3 1.4.2. Relationship to Statutes and Regulations .................................................................. 5 1.5. Scoping and Issues .......................................................................................................... 6 1.5.1. Internal Scoping ........................................................................................................ 6 1.5.2. Internal and External Scoping ................................................................................... 7 1.5.3. Issues ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mesilla Valley Bosque State Park Doña Ana County, New Mexico
    MESILLA VALLEY BOSQUE STATE PARK DOÑA ANA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO VEGETATION SURVEY Robert Sivinski EMNRD-Forestry Division August 2005 OVERVIEW The proposed Mesilla Valley Bosque State Park consists of west bank Rio Grande floodplain roughly between the Mesilla Dam and the State Road 538 Bridge. Several hundred acres of desert uplands occur to the east of the southern half of this river park. Substrates are mostly recent alluvial and colluvial deposits and generally consist of alkaline, sandy soils. Some of the lowest areas in the floodplain have alkaline silt and fine sand soils, and there are a few clayey outcrops in the desert uplands. The vegetation in this park area has been heavily impacted by river channelization, irrigation ditches, drains, roads and off-road vehicles, alien weeds (especially saltcedar), and centuries of livestock grazing. Nevertheless, there are some interesting remnants of the original Rio Grande floodplain in this area. The saltgrass/sacaton flat between the levee and irrigation ditch is especially noteworthy. Despite a few vague irrigation or drainage furrows, I believe this alkaline grassland (with a few scattered stands of cottonwood trees) is a small remnant piece of the natural vegetation community that dominated much of the middle Rio Grande floodplain prior to channelization and conversion to agriculture. This grassland is not especially diverse in species, but is the most interesting part of the park in terms of its historical significance. Plant association changes in composition and density occur frequently and gradually throughout the park and cannot be mapped with any accuracy. Therefore, the vegetation map of this survey only recognizes three major plant communities: floodplain grassland, mixed riparian (woody plants), and Chihuahuan Desert scrub (also woody plants).
    [Show full text]
  • A Proposed Low Distortion Projection for the City of Las Cruces and Dona Ana County Scott Farnham, PE, PS City Surveyor, City of Las Cruces NM October 2020
    A Proposed Low Distortion Projection for the City of Las Cruces and Dona Ana County Scott Farnham, PE, PS City Surveyor, City of Las Cruces NM October 2020 Introduction As part of the ongoing modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System (NSRS), the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) will replace our horizontal and vertical datums (NAD83 and NAVD88) with new geometric datums assigned in the North American Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2022 (NATRF2022). The City of Las Cruces / Dona Ana County and the City of Albuquerque / Bernalillo County submitted proposals to NGS to incorporate Low Distortion Projections (LDP) as part of the New Mexico State Plane Coordinate Systems. Approval by NGS was obtained on June 17, 2019 for the proposed systems (see approval notice). Design of the LDP is the responsibility of the submitting agencies and must be submitted to NGS on or prior to March 31, 2021. Mark Marrujo1 with NMDOT is submitting final LDP design forms to NGS for the State of New Mexico. The City of Las Cruces (City) is designing a new Low Distortion Projection for Public Works Department, Engineering and Architecture projects to NGS criteria. To meet NGS LDP minimum size and shape criterion, the LDP area extends to Dona Ana County (County) boundary lines. This report presents design analysis and conclusions of the proposed City / County local NGS LDP system for stakeholders’ review prior to NGS final design submittal. NGS NM SPCS2022 Zones and Stakeholder Organizations NGS is designing new State Plane Coordinate Systems (SPCS2022) for New Mexico. The default SPCS2022 designs for the State are a statewide single zone and the three State Plane Zones: West, Central, and East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Permian Abo Formation in the Fra Cristobal and Caballo Mountains, Sierra County, New Mexico Spencer G
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/63 The Lower Permian Abo Formation in the Fra Cristobal and Caballo Mountains, Sierra County, New Mexico Spencer G. Lucas, Karl Krainer, Dan S. Chaney, William A. DiMichele, Sebastian Voigt, David S. Berman, and Amy C. Henrici, 2012, pp. 345-376 in: Geology of the Warm Springs Region, Lucas, Spencer G.; McLemore, Virginia T.; Lueth, Virgil W.; Spielmann, Justin A.; Krainer, Karl, New Mexico Geological Society 63rd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 580 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2012 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Overview Desert Peaks Complex of the Organ Mountains – Desert Peaks National Monument Doña Ana County, New Mexico
    Cultural Resources Overview Desert Peaks Complex of the Organ Mountains – Desert Peaks National Monument Doña Ana County, New Mexico Myles R. Miller, Lawrence L. Loendorf, Tim Graves, Mark Sechrist, Mark Willis, and Margaret Berrier Report submitted to the Wilderness Society Sacred Sites Research, Inc. July 18, 2017 Public Version This version of the Cultural Resources overview is intended for public distribution. Sensitive information on site locations, including maps and geographic coordinates, has been removed in accordance with State and Federal antiquities regulations. Executive Summary Since the passage of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) in 1966, at least 50 cultural resource surveys or reviews have been conducted within the boundaries of the Desert Peaks Complex. These surveys were conducted under Sections 106 and 110 of the NHPA. More recently, local avocational archaeologists and supporters of the Organ Monument-Desert Peaks National Monument have recorded several significant rock art sites along Broad and Valles canyons. A review of site records on file at the New Mexico Historic Preservation Division and consultations with regional archaeologists compiled information on over 160 prehistoric and historic archaeological sites in the Desert Peaks Complex. Hundreds of additional sites have yet to be discovered and recorded throughout the complex. The known sites represent over 13,000 years of prehistory and history, from the first New World hunters who gazed at the nighttime stars to modern astronomers who studied the same stars while peering through telescopes on Magdalena Peak. Prehistoric sites in the complex include ancient hunting and gathering sites, earth oven pits where agave and yucca were baked for food and fermented mescal, pithouse and pueblo villages occupied by early farmers of the Southwest, quarry sites where materials for stone tools were obtained, and caves and shrines used for rituals and ceremonies.
    [Show full text]
  • User Notes: Las Cruces, New Mexico, National Wetlands Inventory
    USER NOTES : LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO, NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP Map Preparation The wetland classifications that appear on the Las Cruces NWI Base Map are in accordance with Cowardin et al .(1977) . The delineations were produced through stereoscope interpretation of 1 :110,000-scale color infrared aerial photographs taken in February, 1971, and 1 :80,000-scale bladk-and-white-aerial photographs taken in March, 1977 . The delineations were enlarged using a zoom transferscope to overlays of 1 :24,000-scale and 1 :62,500-scale . These overlays were then transferred to 1 :100,000-scale to produce the Base Map . Aerial photographs were unavailable for the western portion of the Las Cruces area 1 :62,500-scale map, the western and southern portion of the Afton area 1 :62,500-scale map, and the eastern portions of the White Sands NW, Davies Tank, Newman NW, and Newman SW area 1 :24,000-scale maps . These areas are therefore without wetland designations on the Las Cruces NWI Base Map . Extensive field checks of the delineated wetlands of the Las Cruces NWI Base Map were conducted in June, 1981 to determine the accuracy of the aerial photointerpretation and to provide qualifying descriptions of mapped wetland designations . The user of the map is cautioned that, due to the limitation of mapping primarily through aerial photointerpretation, a small percentage of wetlands may have gone unidentified . Changes in the landscape could have occurred since the time of photography, therefore some discrepancies between the map and current field conditions may exist . Any discrepancies that are encountered in the use of this map should be brought to the attention of Warren Hagenbuck, Regional Wetlands Coordinator, U .
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande Project
    Rio Grande Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Rio Grande Project.............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................6 Construction History .....................................................7 Post-Construction History................................................15 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................22 Conclusion............................................................25 Suggested Readings ...........................................................25 About the Author .............................................................25 Bibliography ................................................................27 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................27 Government Documents .................................................27 Articles...............................................................27 Books ................................................................29 Newspapers ...........................................................29 Other Sources..........................................................29 Index ......................................................................30 1 Rio Grande Project At the twentieth
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation Papers
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WATER-SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION PAPERS OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 10 WASHINGTON GOVERNMEN'l' PRIN'l'ING OFFICE l~H8 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT. DIRECTOR IRRIGATION IN MESILLA VALLEY, NEW MEXICO BY F. C. BARI~ER WASHINGTON GO"VERNMENT PRINTING OFFIOE 1898 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal ......••••...••••..........••.......•••••••.•••••..•••.. 9 Location and history ...............••.•.........••.....•.•.••••...••...••••. 11 Climate ..............................•.•.....•...•••...••••..••••....••.••.• 14 Water sul1ply .......... -. -----· · · ·-· · · · • • • · • • · · • · • • • • · · · · • • • · · · • • · · • · • · • • • · · 15 Flow of the Rio Grande ..•.•...........•...•••...•.•.....•..........•••. 15 Summer droughts ....................................................... 17 Water storage ...................•....•••...•.•..•••....••.....•...••... 19 Quality of water .......................••..•.•........•••.•.••.......... 20 Canal system ................................•.•.....•.•....•......•...•••.. 21 Management of the canals ..•.••........••••..•.•...•••..•.••..•...•••••. 22 Distribution of water ...............••..•.••.••••.......•...........•... 24 Methods of applying water ..•••.....•......•••..•••••..••••.•.•..••••••••••. 24 Flooding in checks ......••••..........•....•••••....••..••••..•••.•..... 24 Furrow irrigation .............••.......•••..........••..••••.••..••••••. 26 Quantity of water needed ...................•••..•........•.......· .......••. 27 Cultivation
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar Year 2016 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Law of the Rio Chama The Utton Transboundary Resources Center 2016 Calendar Year 2016 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission Dick Wolfe Colorado Tom Blaine New Mexico Patrick R. Gordon Texas Hal Simpson Federal Chairman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/uc_rio_chama Recommended Citation Wolfe, Dick; Tom Blaine; Patrick R. Gordon; and Hal Simpson. "Calendar Year 2016 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/uc_rio_chama/72 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Utton Transboundary Resources Center at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law of the Rio Chama by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Calendar Year 2016 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission Colorado New Mexico Texas Dick Wolfe Tom Blaine Patrick R. Gordon Federal Chairman Hal Simpson U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Albuquerque Area Office Albuquerque, New Mexico March 2017 MISSION STATEMENTS The Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Cover photo – Overbank flow at habitat restoration site on the Sevilleta NWR during 2016 spring pulse (Dustin Armstrong, Reclamation) Calendar Year 2016 Report to the Rio Grande Compact Commission U.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Surface-Water Quantity and Quality and Shallow Groundwater Levels and Quality Within the Rio Grande Project Area, New Mexico and Texas, 2009–13
    Prepared in cooperation with the New Mexico Environment Department and the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission Variability of Surface-Water Quantity and Quality and Shallow Groundwater Levels and Quality Within the Rio Grande Project Area, New Mexico and Texas, 2009–13 Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Left, Flood irrigation of pecan orchards in the Rio Grande Project area, New Mexico, June 2014. Right, Dry Rio Grande riverbed near Selden Canyon, New Mexico, December 2014. Bottom, Irrigation conveyance and gate with row crops in the background, Rio Grande Project area, New Mexico, June 2014. U.S. Geological Survey photographs by Jessica M. Driscoll. Variability of Surface-Water Quantity and Quality and Shallow Groundwater Levels and Quality Within the Rio Grande Project Area, New Mexico and Texas, 2009–13 By Jessica M. Driscoll and Lauren R. Sherson Prepared in cooperation with the New Mexico Environment Department and the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 143 Rio Grande Basin 08328500 Jemez Canyon Reservoir
    RIO GRANDE BASIN 143 08328500 JEMEZ CANYON RESERVOIR NEAR BERNALILLO, NM ° ° 1 1 LOCATION.--Lat 35 23'40", long 106 32'50", in SW ⁄4 SW ⁄4 sec.32, T.14 N., R.4 E., Sandoval County, Hydrologic Unit 13020202, at corner of outlet works control tower of Jemez Canyon Dam on Jemez River, 2.8 mi upstream from mouth, and 6.0 mi north of Bernalillo. DRAINAGE AREA.--l,034 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1953 to September 1965 (monthend contents only), October 1965 to current year. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (levels by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). REMARKS.--Reservoir is formed by earthfill dam, completed Oct. 19, 1953. Capacity, 172,800 acre-ft, from capacity table adapted Jan. 1, 1999, between elevations 5,125.0 ft, sill of outlet gates, and 5,252.3 ft, operating deck of spillway. Maximum controlled capacity, 102,700 acre-ft at elevation 5,232.0 ft (floor of spillway, which is located about 0.8 mi south of dam). Capacity by original survey was 189,100 acre-ft. Original plan for reservoir operation was to desilt all flow above 30 ft3/s by storage for one day before releasing to Rio Grande, and for possible detention during flood stage on Rio Grande. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers satellite telemetry at station. COOPERATION.--Records provided by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum contents, 72,110 acre-ft, June 1, 1987, elevation, 5,220.24 ft; no storage most of time prior to Mar.
    [Show full text]