DOCSLIB.ORG

143 Rio Grande Basin 08328500 Jemez Canyon Reservoir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
143 Rio Grande Basin 08328500 Jemez Canyon Reservoir RIO GRANDE BASIN 143 08328500 JEMEZ CANYON RESERVOIR NEAR BERNALILLO, NM ° ° 1 1 LOCATION.--Lat 35 23'40", long 106 32'50", in SW ⁄4 SW ⁄4 sec.32, T.14 N., R.4 E., Sandoval County, Hydrologic Unit 13020202, at corner of outlet works control tower of Jemez Canyon Dam on Jemez River, 2.8 mi upstream from mouth, and 6.0 mi north of Bernalillo. DRAINAGE AREA.--l,034 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1953 to September 1965 (monthend contents only), October 1965 to current year. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (levels by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). REMARKS.--Reservoir is formed by earthfill dam, completed Oct. 19, 1953. Capacity, 172,800 acre-ft, from capacity table adapted Jan. 1, 1999, between elevations 5,125.0 ft, sill of outlet gates, and 5,252.3 ft, operating deck of spillway. Maximum controlled capacity, 102,700 acre-ft at elevation 5,232.0 ft (floor of spillway, which is located about 0.8 mi south of dam). Capacity by original survey was 189,100 acre-ft. Original plan for reservoir operation was to desilt all flow above 30 ft3/s by storage for one day before releasing to Rio Grande, and for possible detention during flood stage on Rio Grande. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers satellite telemetry at station. COOPERATION.--Records provided by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum contents, 72,110 acre-ft, June 1, 1987, elevation, 5,220.24 ft; no storage most of time prior to Mar. 1979 and Oct. 27, 2001, to present. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--No storage all year. Capacity table (elevation, in feet, and contents, in acre-feet) (Based on survey by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1998) Elevation Contents Elevation Contents 5,180 8,650 5,190 17,360 5,185 12,800 5,195 23,220 144 RIO GRANDE BASIN 08329000 JEMEZ RIVER BELOW JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM ° ° 1 LOCATION.--Lat 35 23'25", long 106 32'06", in NE ⁄4 sec.5, T.13 N., R.4 E., Sandoval County, Hydrologic Unit 13020202, on right bank 0.8 mi downstream from Jemez Canyon Dam, 2.0 mi upstream from mouth, and 6.0 mi north of Bernalillo. DRAINAGE AREA.--1,038 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD.--March 1936 to January 1938, March 1943 to current year. Published as "Jemez Creek" prior to 1948, and as "near Bernalillo" prior to 1954. REVISED RECORDS.--WSP 1178: 1949. WSP 1212: 1950. WSP 1512: 1936, 1943, 1945, 1947-48, 1949(M), 1950. WSP 1732: Drainage area. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder with satellite telemetry. Datum of gage is 5,095.60 ft above National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers bench mark). Prior to Apr. 24, 1951, at site 0.8 mi upstream at datum 24.51 ft higher. Apr. 24, 1951, to June 25, 1958, at site 37 ft upstream at datum 4.40 ft above present datum. Supplementary water-stage recorder at gages on Jemez Canyon Dam at datum 5,125.00 ft above National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers bench mark) used at times since Jan. 1953. REMARKS.--Records poor. Subsequent to October 1953, flow at this station can be completely regulated by Jemez Canyon Reservoir (station 08328500). However, reservoir is designed essentially for desilting and flood control rather than storage. Diversions for irrigation of about 3,000 acres upstream from station. EXTREMES OUTSIDE PERIOD OF RECORD.--A flood in 1900 was probably less than 16,000 ft3/s but highest observed outside period of record. DISCHARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECOND WATER YEAR OCTOBER 2002 TO SEPTEMBER 2003 DAILY MEAN VALUES DAY OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 10 7.3 17 31 22 30 39 155 40 0.97 0.10 e180 2 9.4 9.1 22 37 23 27 42 121 50 0.93 0.09 e54 3 9.0 e5.9 27 34 22 29 47 116 38 0.76 0.12 e0.30 4 8.6 e11 32 29 24 26 45 113 32 0.81 0.12 e0.50 5 8.4 15 23 30 20 29 39 109 28 0.55 0.10 e350 6 7.9 15 15 45 18 26 36 93 21 0.69 0.11 e159 7 7.4 15 15 50 14 24 38 74 14 0.63 0.13 e75 8 6.6 16 18 43 13 27 40 52 7.3 0.19 0.10 e23 9 6.6 18 22 50 10 27 37 58 6.0 0.30 0.10 e13 10 6.3 32 26 62 9.0 28 38 52 11 0.26 0.11 e5.0 11 6.0 32 27 27 10 37 43 56 3.8 0.30 0.12 e10 12 5.9 21 26 e26 12 59 58 56 2.8 0.31 0.10 e5.0 13 5.6 24 24 e27 22 114 67 52 2.9 0.29 0.09 e3.2 14 5.3 21 27 e26 25 200 113 61 2.6 0.27 0.08 e2.3 15 4.9 19 39 e25 58 123 141 81 1.2 0.17 0.09 e2.2 16 4.6 21 30 e24 39 107 163 102 1.4 0.14 0.09 e0.13 17 4.4 21 25 25 31 89 163 90 2.7 0.16 0.10 e0.08 18 4.3 21 35 33 31 75 186 101 2.3 0.18 0.13 e0.20 19 4.0 23 35 22 31 68 216 107 1.6 0.17 0.07 e0.20 20 3.8 22 12 27 28 56 234 86 2.4 0.12 e0.08 e0.18 21 3.4 24 35 21 27 58 211 73 1.5 0.18 e0.07 e0.17 22 3.1 24 39 22 29 55 253 61 1.2 0.18 e0.06 e0.16 23 3.1 25 33 21 28 59 299 58 1.2 0.14 e0.07 e0.15 24 9.4 23 31 21 28 68 317 54 1.2 0.13 e0.09 e0.15 25 e9.2 21 88 22 29 73 291 65 1.1 0.15 e0.10 e0.12 26 e9.8 21 22 22 32 66 257 142 1.1 0.13 e0.11 e0.12 27 102 23 28 23 32 58 316 106 1.3 0.10 e0.09 e0.09 28 28 21 55 28 31 52 405 151 0.90 0.14 e0.03 e0.11 29 e4.2 20 69 25 --- 44 435 100 1.3 0.08 e0.03 e0.15 30 e4.0 18 29 24 --- 40 168 76 0.78 0.08 e0.28 0.22 31 6.9 --- 34 21 --- 36 --- 49 --- 0.12 e450 --- TOTAL 312.1 589.3 960 923 698.0 1,810 4,737 2,670 282.58 9.63 452.96 884.73 MEAN 10.1 19.6 31.0 29.8 24.9 58.4 158 86.1 9.42 0.31 14.6 29.5 MAX 102 32 88 62 58 200 435 155 50 0.97 450 350 MIN 3.1 5.9 12 21 9.0 24 36 49 0.78 0.08 0.03 0.08 AC-FT 619 1,170 1,900 1,830 1,380 3,590 9,400 5,300 560 19 898 1,750 STATISTICS OF MONTHLY MEAN DATA FOR WATER YEARS 1943 - 2003, BY WATER YEAR (WY) MEAN 28.2 28.9 21.4 24.0 27.7 64.7 180 182 72.9 24.8 43.1 23.6 MAX 193 179 74.4 67.9 75.1 288 772 968 988 358 247 157 (WY) (1987) (1958) (1987) (1999) (1987) (1995) (1985) (1973) (1958) (1987) (1991) (1988) MIN 0.000 2.22 0.20 0.25 0.34 7.77 0.96 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.13 0.000 (WY) (1956) (1997) (1985) (1985) (1985) (2002) (1996) (1972) (1946) (1947) (1950) (1945) SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR 2002 CALENDAR YEAR FOR 2003 WATER YEAR WATER YEARS 1943 - 2003 ANNUAL TOTAL 5,018.64 14,329.30 ANNUAL MEAN 13.7 39.3 60.6 HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN 178 1973 LOWEST ANNUAL MEAN 10.6 1953 HIGHEST DAILY MEAN 621 Sep 13 450 Aug 31 3,640 Jun 19, 1958 LOWEST DAILY MEAN 0.09 May 3 0.03 Aug 28 0.00 May 24, 1943 ANNUAL SEVEN-DAY MINIMUM 0.13 Jul 26 0.07 Aug 23 0.00 May 24, 1943 MAXIMUM PEAK FLOW 1,470 Aug 31 a16,300 Aug 29, 1943 MAXIMUM PEAK STAGE c9.80 Aug 31 b9.80 Aug 31, 2003 INSTANTANEOUS LOW FLOW 0.02 Jul 20 0.00 May 23, 1943 ANNUAL RUNOFF (AC-FT) 9,950 28,420 43,900 10 PERCENT EXCEEDS 30 101 149 50 PERCENT EXCEEDS 4.0 22 18 90 PERCENT EXCEEDS 0.31 0.12 0.00 a From rating curve extended above 3,000 ft3/s. b Site and datum then in use. c From floodmarks. e Estimated RIO GRANDE BASIN 145 08329700 CAMPUS WASH AT ALBUQUERQUE, NM ° ° 1 LOCATION.--Lat 35 05'38", long 106 37'25", in SE ⁄4 sec.16, T.10 N., R.3 E., Bernalillo County, Hydrologic Unit 13020203, on right bank 100 ft west of southwest corner of University of New Mexico North Golf Course, 200 ft downstream from Barelas Stormwater Pumping Station outfall, 600 ft downstream from Tucker Road bridge, and 1,500 ft northeast of intersection of Lomas and University Boulevards, in Albuquerque.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Mexico New Mexico
    NEW MEXICO NEWand MEXICO the PIMERIA ALTA THE COLONIAL PERIOD IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEst edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves NEW MEXICO AND THE PIMERÍA ALTA NEWand MEXICO thePI MERÍA ALTA THE COLONIAL PERIOD IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEst edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves UNIVERSITY PRESS OF COLORADO Boulder © 2017 by University Press of Colorado Published by University Press of Colorado 5589 Arapahoe Avenue, Suite 206C Boulder, Colorado 80303 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The University Press of Colorado is a proud member of Association of American University Presses. The University Press of Colorado is a cooperative publishing enterprise supported, in part, by Adams State University, Colorado State University, Fort Lewis College, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Regis University, University of Colorado, University of Northern Colorado, Utah State University, and Western State Colorado University. ∞ This paper meets the requirements of the ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). ISBN: 978-1-60732-573-4 (cloth) ISBN: 978-1-60732-574-1 (ebook) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Douglass, John G., 1968– editor. | Graves, William M., editor. Title: New Mexico and the Pimería Alta : the colonial period in the American Southwest / edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves. Description: Boulder : University Press of Colorado, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016044391| ISBN 9781607325734 (cloth) | ISBN 9781607325741 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Spaniards—Pimería Alta (Mexico and Ariz.)—History. | Spaniards—Southwest, New—History. | Indians of North America—First contact with Europeans—Pimería Alta (Mexico and Ariz.)—History.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of New Mexicoi
    Threatened and Endangered Fishes of New MexicoI BY DAVID L. PROPST ILLUSTRATED BY W. HOWARD BRANDENBURG MAPS BY AMBER L. HOBBES ◆ EDITED BY PAUL C. MARSH TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1 1999 NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH STATE OF NEW MEXICO: Gary E. Johnson, Governor STATE GAME COMMISSION: William H. Brininstool, Chairman ◆ Jal Gail J. Cramer ◆ Farmington Steve Padilla ◆ Albuquerque Dr. William E. Schuler ◆ Albuquerque George A. Ortega ◆ Santa Fe Bud Hettinga ◆ Las Cruces Stephen E. Doerr ◆ Portales DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH: Gerald A. Maracchini, Director CONSERVATION SERVICES DIVISION: Andrew V. Sandoval, Chief $10.00 1999 Threatened and Endangered FISHES of New Mexico ◆ 1 Propst, D.L. 1999. Threatened and endangered fishes of New Mexico. Tech. Rpt. No. 1. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, NM. 84 pp. Cover by NoBul Graphics, Albuquerque, NM. Design and production by Janelle Harden, The Studio, Albuquerque, NM. Publication and printing supported by the Turner Foundation, Atlanta, GA. In part, a contribution of Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration., Project FW–17–RD. Contents may be reprinted if credit is given to the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. Complete copies may be purchased for $10.00 U.S. (see address below). Make checks payable to “New Mexico Department of Game and Fish.” Conservation Services Division New Mexico Department of Game and Fish P.O. Box 25112 Santa Fe, NM 87504 (505) 827-7882 2 ◆ New Mexico Department of Game and Fish FORWARD Threatened and Endangered Fishes of New a major concern. Over half of the rivers in New Mexico Mexico by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Geochemistry of the Albuquerque-Belen Basin, Central New Mexico
    GROUND-WA TER GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE ALBVQVERQVE-BELEN BASIN, CENTRAL NEW MEXICO By Scott K. Anderholm U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4094 Albuquerque, New Mexico 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Books and Open-File Reports Pinetree Office Park Federal Center, Building 810 4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200 Box 25425 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................. 1 Introduction ......................................................... 2 Acknowledgments ................................................. 4 Purpose and scope ............................................... 4 Location ........................................................ 4 Climate ......................................................... 6 Previous investigations ......................................... 6 Geology .................................................... 6 Hydrology .................................................. 6 Well-numbering system ........................................... 9 Geology .............................................................. 10 Precambrian rocks ............................................... 10 Paleozoic rocks ................................................. 10 Mesozoic
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Hydrology of Valles Caldera and the Southwestern Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
    GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO By Frank W. Trainer, Robert J. Rogers, and Michael L. Sorey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Albuquerque, New Mexico 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 5338 Montgomery NE, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Albuquerque, NM 87109-1311 Information regarding research and data-collection programs of the U.S. Geological Survey is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the Home Page for the New Mexico District Office using the URL: http://nm.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................ 2 Purpose and scope........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: the Hydrologic System of the Middle Rio Grande Basin
    Chapter 4: The hydrologic system of the Middle Rio Grande Basin In discussions of the water resources of an area, the hydrologic system is commonly split into two components for convenience: surface water and ground water. However, in the Middle Rio Grande Basin, as in most other locales, the surface- and ground-water systems are intimately linked through a series of complex interactions. These interactions often make it difficult to recognize the boundary between the two systems. In The Rio Grande is the only river I ever this report, the surface- and ground-water systems are described separately, saw that needed irrigation. –attributed to though one of the goals of the report is to show that they are both parts of Will Rogers the hydrologic system of the Middle Rio Grande Basin and that changes in one often affect the other. As defined earlier, in this report “Middle Rio Grande Basin” refers to the geologic basin defined by the extent of deposits of Cenozoic age along the Rio Grande from about Cochiti Dam to about San Acacia. This definition includes nearly the entire ground-water basin; however, the extent of the surface-water basin is delimited topographically by drainage divides and is consequently somewhat larger than the ground-water basin. Surface-water system The most prominent hydrologic feature in the Middle Rio Grande Basin is the Rio Grande, which flows through the entire length of the basin, generally from north to south. The fifth longest river in the United States, its headwaters are in the mountains of southern Colorado. The Rio Grande is the largest river in New Mexico, with a drainage area of 14,900 square miles where it enters the Middle Rio Grande Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • July 13, 2015 Cons: # 02ENNM00
    New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office 2105 Osuna NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113 Phone: (505) 346-2525 Fax: (505) 346-2542 July 13, 2015 Cons: # 02ENNM00-2014-F-0266 Maria T. Garcia, Forest Supervisor Santa Fe National Forest 11 Forest Lane Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508 Dear Ms. Garcia: Thank you for your request for formal consultation and conferencing with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). We began early coordination with you and received a Biological Assessment (BA) (dated June 6, 2014) and supplemental information, which evaluate the impacts of the Southwest Jemez Mountains Restoration Project Santa Fe National Forest Jemez Ranger District Sandoval County, New Mexico (Restoration Project). At issue are potential impacts from the proposed action on the Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) (MSO) and its critical habitat, the Jemez Mountains salamander (Plethodon neomexicanus) (salamander) and its critical habitat, the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus) and its proposed critical habitat, and the Rio Grande Cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis) (cutthroat trout). You determined that the proposed action “may affect, is likely to adversely affect” the MSO and its designated critical habitat, the salamander and its designated critical habitat, the jumping mouse and its proposed critical habitat. This biological opinion does not rely on the regulatory definition of “destruction or adverse modification” of critical habitat at 50 CFR 402.02. Instead, we have relied upon the statute and the August 6, 2004, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Gifford Pinchot Task Force v.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande Project
    Rio Grande Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Rio Grande Project.............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................6 Construction History .....................................................7 Post-Construction History................................................15 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................22 Conclusion............................................................25 Suggested Readings ...........................................................25 About the Author .............................................................25 Bibliography ................................................................27 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................27 Government Documents .................................................27 Articles...............................................................27 Books ................................................................29 Newspapers ...........................................................29 Other Sources..........................................................29 Index ......................................................................30 1 Rio Grande Project At the twentieth
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation and Coordination
    Brantley and Avalon Reservoirs RMPA Final Environmental Assessment February 2011 CHAPTER 5: CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION The preparation of the Brantley and Avalon Reservoirs Resource Management Plan Amendment (RMPA) Environmental Assessment (EA) required a comprehensive consultation and coordination effort throughout the RMPA planning process. The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) initiated the RMPA planning process in July 2006 by requesting comments to determine the scope of issues and concerns that needed to be addressed in this Final EA document. As part of the resource inventory phase of the planning process, members of the interdisciplinary team formally and informally contacted various relevant agencies to request data to supplement Reclamation’s existing resource database. This chapter describes the coordination with agencies that either have jurisdiction by law or interest in the development of the RMPA for the Project Area. In addition, this chapter describes the public involvement process that was undertaken for the Brantley and Avalon Reservoirs RMPA project and provides a distribution list of agencies and organizations receiving a copy of this Final EA. Written comments received on the Draft EA document, along with Reclamation responses, are provided in Appendix D. 5.1 CONSULTATION A number of Federal and State government agencies, as well as local governments, were consulted during the RMPA planning process through communications, meetings, and other cooperative efforts. Cooperating agencies for this EA are the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Carlsbad Irrigation District (CID). Additional government agencies consulted included the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the New Mexico State Historic Preservation Office (NMSHPO), the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish (NMDGF), and 19 Native American Tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande Project
    RIO GRANDE PROJECT El Paso Field Division 10737 Gateway Blvd. West, Suite 350 El Paso, TX 79935 U. S Dept. of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation RIO GRANDE PROJECT CURRENT HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN U. S Dept. of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation ALBUQUERQUE AREA OFFICE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION ~ I CO ·· - ·· - ·· AZ:NM I • AMARILLO RIO GRANDE PROJECT MEXICO %OF AVG. SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT vs TIME %OF AVG. SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT vs TIME Upper Rio Grande Basin (Basin Avg.) Rio Chama Basin (Basin Avg.) 600 ~-----------------., 140 ...--:-------------:--;:--:-;:-=--~ w ~500 .------------~ ~ 120 ~~-------~~~~ ~ Avg=Avgo ~400 #---------------~~~~ ~ 100 ~H*--~.----~~=-~ ~ Avg=Avg o w 9SNOTEL 4 SNOTEL ~300 ~-----------~ Sites ~ 8o ~UW~~.J~~~----~ ~ 60 ~~~~----~~--~ Sites ~200 rr~----------~ 0 40 ~-----------~ ~ ~100 ~~~~~""~~~-----~ 20 ~-----------~ o ~~~~~TITITTI~~~~Trrrrrn 10/1 11/6 12/18 1/29 3/12 4/23 6/4 7/16 10/1 11/6 12/18 1/29 3/12 4/23 6/4 7/16 OCT. 01,2006 to APR. 30,2007 OCT. 01,2006 to APR. 30,2007 %OF AVG. SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT vs TIME %OF AVG. SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT vs TIME Sangre de Cristo Mtn Basins (Basin Avg.) Jemez River Basin (Basin Avg.) 160 ...-----------------., w 140 +-----~------~ ~ 120 ~---~~~~-~--~ w 120 ...-------~--~-----------­ ~ Avg=Avgo ~ 100 ~------~1r~r---~~~~ ffi 100 +--+--~----+-~------~ ~ Avg=Avgo ~ 80 ~~~-~---~---~ 9SNOTEL ffi 80 +------1~----r---------­ Sites 3 SNOTEL ~ 60 ~~~~-----~==~~ ~ 60 ~----~------~---------­ Sites ~ 40 ++~~~-----~~-"~ o~ 40 ~~r-~------~~-------­ 20 ++--------~~~~ ~ 20 ~~~~--------+--------- o ~~~~~~~~~~~~nTM o ~~~~~~~ITTI~ITnTITITTITIT 10/1 11/6 12/18 1/29 3/12 4/23 6/4 7/16 10/1 11 /6 12/18 1/29 3/12 4/23 6/4 7/16 OCT.
    [Show full text]
  • Angostura Dam to Montaño Bridge: Geomorphic and Hydraulic Analysis
    Angostura Dam to Montaño Bridge: Geomorphic and Hydraulic Analysis Upper Colorado Region Albuquerque Area Office Technical Services Division Middle Rio Grande Project, NM August 2018 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Page 2 Angostura Dam to Montaño Bridge: Geomorphic and Hydraulic Analysis Middle Rio Grande Project, NM Technical Services Division Albuquerque Area Office Upper Colorado Region Report Prepared by: Aubrey Harris, PE, Hydraulic Engineer Michelle Klein, PE, Hydraulic Engineer Chi Bui, PE, Sr. Hydraulic Engineer Report Reviewed by: Robert Padilla, PE, DWRE, Supervisory Civil (Hydraulic) Engineer Ari Posner, PhD, Physical Scientist Mark Nemeth, PE, PhD, Technical Services Division Manager Cover Picture: Taken by Chi Bui in July 2017. At RM 199 (BB-342) east bank, looking downstream on the Rio Grande, located on Sandia Pueblo. Page 3 Contents 0.0 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 0.1 Content Guide ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CID Main Canal Lining Project for Water Saving & Efficiency
    CID Main Canal Lining Project for Water Saving & Efficiency Carlsbad Irrigation District, New Mexico WaterSMART Grants: Small-Scale Water Efficiency Projects FY2018 Funding Number: BOR-DO-18-F009 CFDA Number: 15.507 Submitted July 2018 to Bureau of Reclamation Financial Assistance Support Section by Carlsbad Irrigation District Dale Ballard, CID Manager Mary Barnhart, CID Board Member 5117 Grandi Road Carlsbad, NM 88220 575-236-6390 Fax: 575-236-6396 [email protected] Table of Contents 1. Technical Proposal: ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Background Data.............................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1. Source of Water Supply & Uses .................................................................................... 2 1.2.2. Water Rights .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3. Geographic Location Vicinity Map............................................................................... 3 1.2.4. Current Water Demand ................................................................................................. 3 1.2.5. Major Crops and Total Acres Served ............................................................................ 3 1.2.6. Water Delivery
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Hydrologic Alteration and Opportunities for Environmental Flow Management in New Mexico
    Evaluation of Hydrologic Alteration and Opportunities for Environmental Flow Management in New Mexico October 2011 Photo: Elephant Butte Dam, Rio Grande, New Mexico; Prepared by The Cadmus Group, Inc. Courtesy U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. EPA Contract Number EP-C-08-002 i Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Hydrologic Alteration Analysis Study Design ....................................................................................................... 5 What Sites Are Assessed? ............................................................................................................................. 5 What Drives Hydrologic Alteration? ........................................................................................................ 11 How Is Hydrologic Alteration Assessed?................................................................................................. 16 3. Results of Hydrologic Alteration Analysis ........................................................................................................... 19 Alteration of High Flow Events ................................................................................................................ 19 Alteration of Low Flow
    [Show full text]