DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Dod Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Support to Civil Authorities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Dod Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Support to Civil Authorities INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500 MAR 0 4 2015 Ref: FOIA-2015-00487 Mr. Steven Aftergood Federation of American Scientists 1725 DeSales Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 Dear Mr. Aftergood: This is in response to your March 30, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for a copy ofDODIG-2015-097, Evaluation of DoD Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Support to Civil Authorities. We received your request on March 30, 2015, and assigned it case number FOIA-2015-00487. The Office ofthe Deputy Inspector General for Intelligence and Special Program Assessments conducted a search and located the enclosed documents. I determined that some redacted portions of the records are exempt from release pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6), which pe1iains to information, the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Mr. Pa\ll R. Polk, Initial Denial Authority for the National Geospatial-Intelligence . Agency, determined that some redacted p01iions are exempt fi·om release pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3), which pertains to nondisclosure provisions contained in other Federal statutes. In this case, the Federal statute which prevents disclosure is 50 U.S.C. § 3142, which exempts from disclosure operational files of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Colonel Christian Rofrano, Chief Counsel at theNational Guard Bureau, determined that some redacted p01iions of the document are exempt from release pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(E), which petiains to records or information that would reveal techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions or that would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law. In view of the above, you may consider this to be an adverse determination that may be appealed to the Department of Defense, Office oflnspector General, ATTN: FOIA Appellate Authority, Suite 1OB24, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500. Your appeal, if any, must be postmarked within 30 days ofthe date of this letter and should reference the file number above. I recommend that your appeal and its envelope both bear the notation "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Sincerely, Mark Dorgan Acting Division Chief FOIA, Privacy and Civil Liberties Office INTEGRITY * EFFICIENCY* ACCOUNTABILITY* EXCEllENCE Mi~~ion Our mission is to provide Independent, relevant, ami timely ovcrsi[Jht of the Depc;rtment ofDe[ense tlw( support$ the Warf!ghter; promotes accountclbtlit,y, integrity, amJ effidency; .advises the Secretmy of Defense and Con,qress; and Informs tile public. Vi~ion Our vision is to be a model oversight orgcmtzatlon in tlw Federal Govemment by Jeacling change, speCiking truth, and prO/noting eXcC?llence-a diwrse organization workit~,q together as orw professional team, ri!co,(Jnlzed as leadl!t~~ lwour field. F!ll' more inflll'llHJ\Ion about whlstlcQiower protec.Uon, please se.e the inside bad( cpvet: FOR OFFICI/'J.L USE ONLY (U) Recommendations 0Jl Objective (!l)purobjcctiv~wast6de~e.~mh\~Whether • (FBHB) We recommend that USD (P) establish a. stm\dardized .·I.Jh~ liotici.~$ •. ~.~~ .Ptoce.dyr~~ fo.r ~sing l)ol) formal approval process for UAS support to domestic civil UAs ••.~.!l ~lt"?~,~~~~ w~essi9!J. ~lljliOJ~tlon. authorities. an.~ ~i$~~mlratloJi·att~vitie$ compl)'·witl) · ap~I!C<lble !~ws, regul~tions, and ~ational • (F9\J9j We recommend that USD (P) addr·ess the concerns of p~IIci~"'for prov!dl~gs~ppoit ~ ·d.0triestic . civil ~4.t;l)otltie~. ·· ·· ·· Military SeJvice/National Guard Bureau UAS experts that policy ambiguity is potentially degrading UAS training and operaUonal ·cv) Fir~tu~g readiness, M ll<!P i$(ullY..~mpllantwitlilaws, • (FBIJBj We also recommend that the USD (P) fo1'mally charter regt~l~~ons.o~~4~~ti9n~i.p~llcie~.fqr oAs s~pport~o dnmeS\lc civil authorities, the Domestic Imagery Working Group. ,.,·.··. --' ·- - •\' ,____ ,_ -_-_.--\:_: ,.-_, __ ,_ • (!JJ l.lnltsi>Perati.n~\l(l~st!)Id us (U) Management Comments and Our !lta.r,y;h!!et1!eyundemamttbe Am!ific:l\r!I>Ublic'sll'l!itlliiate Response ~oMetnlrab9\itc!0llibettles.an\l (U) The Assistant Secretary ofDefense for Policy, Homeland Defense & privacy n~htS,they dotlqt•.o~.er.it.e Global Security concurred with our recommendations, and no further .ww~ any qtlferentlyfrl'liJ) tnarined comments are required. Please see the Recommendations Table on the platf(lr~ )Yitll slmllarcapabilities. next page. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONlrY Recommendations Table ' ' t\11 ReC!lmmenaatmns ' ' No Additional ' , ' anagemt!nt l<eg)l1r11Jg Gomment Comments,Reguired ; ' ' Under Secretary of Defense for Polley FOR OFFJCIAb USE ONbY FOR OJZFIClAb USS ONh-Y INSPEC1'0R llF.NP.IlAL OEPARTM~NT Ol' lllli'F.NSil 4900 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALF.XANI>RIA. VIRGINIA 22350-150(} March 20, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRBTARY OF DEI'ENSB UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR POLICY SUBJECT: (UJ llvaluationofDoD's Usc of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Support to Civil Authorities (Report No. DODIG·2015·097) (U) Tho Ooputy IG. Intelligence and Special Program Assessments (I SPA) Is providing this report for your information and use. (U) We considered management commentsona draft of this report when preparing tho final report. Comments from the Office ofAssistant Secretary ofOefense for Policy, Homeland Dofenso & Global Socurity wore responsive for all recommendations. (U) We appreciate the courtesies e~tended to the staff. Please direct ques~om to n.e at (703) 699--DSN 664Jiiao...... t(703) 699-J>SN 499- PQR OFPIGIAb YSB QNb¥ POR OFPICil'.l, USB ONL-Y Contents (U) Introduction (U) ObJecdve ....................................................... ,. .................................................................................................................................... , 1 (U) Background ............................................................................................ ,.. ,, .. ,, ........................................................... ,, .. ,..... ,............. 1 (U) Scope and Methodology ............................ _ ........................................................................................................................... 2 (U) Finding ........................................ ~···~·············~~~······&········ 3 (l'900} DoD Is Fully Compliant with Laws, Regulations, and National Policies for UAS Support to Civil Authorlttes ........ ,,N,,,,, ... ., .............. ,, .. ,,,,,.,,,.,,,..,,,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,,.,.,,,.,,.,, .. ,,,,,N,.,.,., .. ,.,,.,, .. ,,~ ............ ~ •• ,, ..... , .......................................................... 3 (UJ StatutotY Envlt·otunent for Umploymont oflloD UAS In Domestic Operations ..................................................... 3 (U) Office of the SecretatY of Defense Unmanned Aircraft System Policy and Guidance ............................................ ! (U) Military Service and National Guard Bureau Implementation and Execution of DoD UAS Policy .................. 2 (U) DoD UAS Support to Civil Authoritlos Evonts ............... ,.................................. ,.... ,............................................................. 3 (l'900} DoD Does Not Have a Standardized Approval Process for UAS Support to Domestic Civil Authorities .............. ,........... ,............................................................................................................. ,............................................ 4 (l'900} Setvice and National Guard UAS Experts ~i<pressed Concern that l'ollcy Ambiguity Is Potentially Deg•·adln g UAS Trafnlng and Operational Readiness. .... ~ .......................... -..... ~ ........... ,_ .. ~ ............................. 5 (U) Impact ofDoD UAS Polley on Processing, Exploltallon, and Dissemination for DSCA ......... ,............................... 6 (U) The Domestic lmagetY Worldng Group ....................................................................................... ,..... ~ ................................ 7 (U) Concluslon ............... - ...... __ .,,,,, .... _,,, ........................................................................................................... :........................... 8 {FOOet Reconirnendations, Management Comments, and Our Response ............................... ~ ................. ,....................... 0 (U) Management Comments ....................... .' ....................... 10 Asslstaltt Secretary o( Defense for Policy ""''""""""'""'"'""""""'""'"'""'"""'""""'""'""""'"""'""""'"'"'"'"'""""'"'"""""""10 Appendixes*········~·,·~··········~················································ 17 (U) DoD Offices VIsited .................................................................................................................................... .,,,,,,,.. ,., .. ,,. ............. 17 (U) Unit's VIsited and Location ,.............................................................................. ~ ..................................................................... 18 (U) Use or Computer· Processed Data ........ ,... _,,.,,,,.,, __ .,,, ............... -................ ,.. _,,,, ...................... ,_,.,,,M ............ ~ ......... ~ ............. lB (U) P rlor Coverage '""'"""'"""'""'""'"'"""""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'""""'""""""'""""'"'""""'""""'""'"'"""""'"""' ......................... 18 {U) Acronyms and Abbreviations .........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manara Academy Manara Academy, Inc
    Application Coversheet Manara Academy Manara Academy, Inc. Name of Proposed Charter School Name of Sponsoring Entity Note: If the sponsoring entity is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, the name must appear exactly as il appears in the Articles of Incorporation or any amendments thereto. The sponsoring entity is a (Check only one.): ^ 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization I I Governmental Entity I] College or University Chairperson of Governing Body of Sponsoring Entity: Ehap Sabri CEO of Sponsoring Entity: Ehap Sabri CEO/Superintendent of Proposed Charter School:, To be determined Representative Who Attended an Applicant Conference: Jaszeer Mohammed Date of Conference: Dec 3r 2067 ~~ Applicant Mailing Address: 4070 N Beltline Rd. Suite 110-140, Irving TX 75038 Physical Address of Proposed Administrative Offices (if different from above): To be determined Number of Campuses Being Requested : One Physical Address of Each Proposed Campus: To be determined Contact Name: Michelle Alkhatib Contact E-mail Address: [email protected] Contact Phone #: (972)896-321 Contact Fax#: (214)260-4984 Circle Grade Levels to be served and state maximum enrollment for each year: By Year 3, at least one grade in which the state accountability tests are administered must be offered. Yearl: Pre-K.3 Pre-K4 (5)6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Maximum Enrollment:_ 326 Year 2: Pre-K3 Pre-K.4 78 9 10 11 12 Maximum Enrollment:. 400 Year 3: Pre-K3 Pre-K4 8 9 10 11 12 Maximum Enrollment:_ 450 Year 4: Pre-K3 Pre-K4 '3X4*5^6 )f7*$) 9 10 11 12 Maximum Enrollment: 500 Year 5: Pre-K3 Pre-K4 'a^rsy/feKTjfS) 9 10 11 12 Maximum Enrollment: 500 I certify that 1 have the authority to submit this application and that all information contained herein is complete and accurate, realizing that any misrepresentation could result in disqualification from the application process or revocation after award.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING AUTHORITY annual report Sydney 1995 Annual N.eport 1994-95 © Commonwealth of Australia, 1995 ISSN 1320-2863 Design by Media and Public Relations A1llst»alian Jllmadcasting Authority ll'dnted ln Autst?alia by Pirie ll'rinte•·s, lFyshwick, ACT For illqu:iiries aboun: this report, coITTutact: Publications Officer Australian Broadcasting Authority at address below IFoir imJ[1llili'ies about iruo<'maUon to be made avail!able rro Members olf Parliament al!lld Senators Oifil Ji'eq_ll.l!est, contact: Director Corporate Senrices Branch Australian Broadcasting Authority at address below lF<H· inqMiides •·elaHng i.o lFi·eedom of Knfo;·maHon, contact: FO! Officer Australian Broadcasting Authority Level 15, 201 Sussex Street Sydney NSW 2000 Ph. (02) 334 7700 Fax: (02) 334 7799 Postal address: PO Box QSOO Queen Victoria Building NSW 2000 2 Introduction Auistralian JBroadcasHng Authority Head Office Level 15 Darling Park 201 Sussex St 26 September 1995 Sydney PO Box Q500 Queen Victoria Building NSW 2000 The Hon. Michael Lee MP Phone (02) 334 7700 Minister for Communications and the Arts Fax (02) 334 7799 DX 13012 Market St Parliament House Sydney CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Minister, In accordance with the provisions of clause 14 of Schedule 2 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, I am pleased to present this report on the operations of the Australian Broadcasting Authority for the year 1994-95. Yours sincerely, 3 4 Introduction Table of contents Letter of transmission 3 Introduction to the report 7 The year in review 8 Corporate overview 17 Performance reporting Objective 1 21 Objective 2 30 Objective 3 36 Objective 4 50 Objective 5 54 Objective 6 68 Objective 7 74 Appendices 1 Staffing overview 79 2 Complaints, classified by category 1994-95 88 3 Freedom of information 89 4 Compliance index 104 5 Financial statements 105 Index 117 5 6 Introduction The report is presented in accordance with the reporting requirements for departmental annual reports.
    [Show full text]
  • TND Ordinance
    PARISH OF ASCENSION TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT Section 1.01 Purpose. The purpose of a Traditional Neighborhood Development Zoning District (“TND District”) is to encourage mixed-Use, compact Development and facilitate the efficient use of services. A TND District diversifies and integrates land Uses within close proximity to each other, and it provides for the daily recreational and shopping needs of the residents. A TND District is a sustainable, long- term community that provides economic opportunity and environmental and social equity for the residents. This ordinance’s intent is to encourage its use by providing incentives, rather than prohibiting conventional Development. A Traditional Neighborhood Development: a. Is designed for the human scale; b. Provides a mix of Uses, including residential, commercial, civic, and open space Uses in close proximity to one another within the neighborhood; c. Provides a variety of housing types, and sizes to accommodate households of all ages, sizes, and incomes; d. Includes residences, shops, workplaces and civic Buildings interwoven within the neighborhood, all within close proximity; e. Incorporates a system of relatively narrow, interconnected Streets, Roads, Drives, and other Thoroughfare Types with sidewalks and bikeways, that offer multiple routes for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists and provides for the connections of those Thoroughfare Types to existing and future Developments; Includes compatibility of Buildings and other improvements as determined by their arrangement, bulk, form, character and landscaping to establish a livable, harmonious and diverse environment; f. Incorporates environmental features into the design; g. Coordinates transportation systems with a hierarchy of appropriately designed facilities for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles; h.
    [Show full text]
  • Apo-Nid63002.Pdf
    AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING TRIBUNAL ANNUAL REPORT 1989-90 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal Sydney 1990 © Commonwealth of Australia 1990 ISSN 0728-8883 Design by Immaculate Conceptions Desktop Publishing, North Sydney, NSW. Printed in Australia by Pirie Printers Sales Pty Ltd, Fyshwick, AC.T. CONTENTS 1. MembersWp of the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal 1 2. The Year in Review 5 3. Powers and Functions of the Tribunal 13 4. Licensing 17 - Number and Type of Licences on Issue 19 - Number of Licensing Inquiries 20 - Bond Inquiry 20 - Commercial Radio Licence Grants 21 - Supplementary Radio Grants 23 - Joined Supplementary/Independent Grant Inquiries 24 - Public Radio Licence Grants 26 - Remote Licences 31 - Licence Renewals 32 - Renewal of Licences with Conditions 33 - Revocation/Suspension Inquiry 35 - Converted Licences 36 - Consolidation of Licences 37 - Allocation of Call Signs 38 - Changes to the Constituent Documents of Licensees 40 - Stations, Markets and Operations Databases 40 5. Ownership and Control 45 - Applications Received 47 - Most Significant Inquiries 47 - Extensions of Time 56 - Appointment of Receivers 57 - Uncompleted Inquiries 58 - Case Studies 62 - Contraventions 63 - Licence Transfers 63 - Uncompleted Inquiries 64 - Operation of Service by Other than Licensee 65 - Registered Lender Inquiries 65 6. Program and Advertising Standards 67 - Program and Advertising Standards 69 - Australian Content 70 - Children's Standards 72 - Comments and Complaints 74 - Broadcasting of Political Matter 75 - Religious Programs 76 - Research 77 iii 7. Programs - Public Inquiries 79 - Public Inquiries 81 - Australian Content 82 - Children's TV Standards 84 - Violence on TV 85 - Advertising Time on Televison 88 - Foreign Content in TV Ads 89 - Right of Reply 90 - John Laws 91 - Betting and Gambling 92 - Standards and Remote Licences 93 - Variation of Australian Content Standard 97 - Variation of Children's TV Standard 98 - Children's and Preschool Children's Television Programs 100 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Chafter9 Other Issues A. Cross-Media Ownership
    CHAFTER9 OTHER ISSUES A. CROSS-MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES 9.1 Prior to 1987 there were restrictions on the number of commercial radio and television licences a person could own. There were no restrictions on cross-ownerships with newspapers. Cross-ownership restrictions which limit common ownership of newspapers and commercial radio and television were introduced for the first time by the Government in 1987 as an integral part of a legislative package which repealed the 32 year old two station rule governing the ownership of commercial television and replaced it with an audience reach rule. The Government retained the limits on the extent of radio ownership as well as the 'one-to-a-market1 rule. The latter prohibited multiple ownership of radio or television licences in any service area. 9.2 The two station rule prevented a person from holding a prescribed interest in more than two commercial television licences throughout Australia. This rule equated an interest in stations in Sydney and Melbourne with an interest in stations in Mildura and Wagga despite massive differences in the population of their service areas. The audience reach rule allows persons to hold prescribed interests in any number of 295 commercial television licences as long as the combined population of their service areas does not exceed 60 per cent of the Australian population. 9.3 In explaining the case for cross-media ownership restrictions, the then Minister for Communications, the Hon. Michael Duffy MP, said in his second reading speech on the Broadcasting (Ownership and Control) BUI IWthat: If competition is to be enhanced, an essential part of the reform program is to limit cross-media ownership, that is, the common ownership of television-newspaper and television-radio interests within the television services areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity Commission Inquiry Into Broadcasting
    PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION INQUIRY INTO BROADCASTING SUBMISSION FROM THE FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL TELEVISION STATIONS MAY 1999 SUMMARY OF SUBMISSION Governments everywhere in the world have intervened in the broadcasting industry to secure a range of economic, social and cultural objectives. Australian Governments have done so for many reasons. Some of these reasons are now of diminishing relevance, while others remain highly relevant on social, cultural or economic grounds. This submission assesses key broadcasting policies, in order to ascertain whether the public benefits outweigh the costs to the community of the restrictions imposed on the industry, or on competition within the industry. Currently, Australia has one of the best and most comprehensive free-to-air broadcasting systems in the world. It offers diversity of programming, quality, national coverage and local services, and programs reflecting our identity as Australians. This has been achieved through a structure of broadcasting developed over many decades. It involves a hybrid system of advertiser-funded and government-funded broadcasters. The advertiser-funded commercial free-to-air services are the predominant element in the system. These locally-licensed services are highly competitive and efficient. They provide much more local service and locally-produced programming - the costliest service components - than would be expected in a country with such a small population. They are able to do this because of long-standing (though recently reviewed) regulatory limits on the number of commercial services in each licence area. These impressive (and costly) service levels are already proving hard to maintain in the face of limited advertising growth and expanding competition from other media.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Regional Commercial Television Ownership and Control
    Station Break: A History of Regional Commercial Television Ownership and Control Michael Thurlow B. Journalism This thesis is presented for the degree of Master of Research Macquarie University Department of Media, Music, Communication and Cultural Studies 9 October 2015 This page has been left blank deliberately. Table of contents Abstract .................................................... i Statement of Candidate .................................... iii Acknowledgements ........................................... iv Abbreviations ............................................... v Figures ................................................... vii Tables ................................................... viii Introduction ................................................ 1 Chapter 1: New Toys for Old Friends ........................ 21 Chapter 2: Regulatory Foundations and Economic Imperatives . 35 Chapter 3: Corporate Ambitions and Political Directives .... 57 Chapter 4: Digital Protections and Technical Disruptions ... 85 Conclusion ................................................ 104 Appendix A: Stage Three Licence Grants .................... 111 Appendix B: Ownership Groups 1963 ......................... 113 Appendix C: Stage Four Licence Grants ..................... 114 Appendix D: Ownership Groups 1968 ......................... 116 Appendix E: Stage Six Licence Grants ...................... 117 Appendix F: Ownership Groups 1975 ......................... 118 Appendix G: Ownership Groups 1985 ......................... 119 Appendix H:
    [Show full text]
  • MPR002 TV Broadcasters.Rep
    Service Area Call Sign On Air Id Licensee ACT/NSW SOUTHERN NEW SOUTH WALES TV CBN CBN Prime Television (Southern) Pty Ltd CTC CTC Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd WIN WIN WIN Television NSW Pty Ltd NSW BROKEN HILL TV1 BKN BKN Broken Hill Television Ltd SCN Broken Hill Television Ltd GRIFFITH AND MIA TV1 AMN AMN WIN Television Griffith Pty Ltd MTN MTN WIN Television Griffith Pty Ltd SYDNEY TV1 Television Sydney (TVS) Limited ATN Network 7 Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd TCN Network 9 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd TEN TEN Network TEN (Sydney) Pty Ltd NSW/QLD NORTHERN NEW SOUTH WALES TV NBN NBN NBN Ltd NEN NEN Prime Television (Northern) Pty Ltd NRN NRN Northern Rivers Television Pty Ltd NT ALI CURUNG TV1 Ali-Curung Council Association Inc. BARUNGA TV1 Barunga-Manyallaluk Community Government Co BATHURST ISLAND RA1 Tiwi Islands Local Government BESWICK TV1 Beswick/Wugularr Town Council BULMAN TV1 Gulin Gulin & Weemol Community Council DAGURAGU TV1 Daguragu Community Government Council DARWIN TV1 NTD NTD Territory Television Pty Ltd TND TND Telecasters Australia Ltd FINKE TV1 Aputula Housing Association Inc. GALIWINKU TV1 ACT66 Galiwinku Community Inc. HERMANNSBURG TV1 Ntaria Council Inc. IMANPA TV1 Imanpa Council Inc. KINTORE TV1 Walungurru Community Council LAJAMANU TV1 Lajamanu Community Government Council MANINGRIDA TV1 Maningrida Council Inc. MILIKAPITI TV1 Tiwi Islands Local Government MILINGIMBI TV1 Milingimbi Community Council Inc. MINJILANG TV1 Minjilang Community Inc. NGUKURR TV1 Yugal Mangi Community Government Council NTURIYA TV1 Anmatjere Community Government Council 29 Jun 2004 Page 1 of 4 Service Area Call Sign On Air Id Licensee NUMBULWAR TV1 Numbulwar Numburindi Council Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Orffiq Qqq Qfr Qrs Sftrrrcfi - Fff,R{ Ffi O.Nisffi Ftci.F:- 2S.06.201S Ors-Sfriq Reter:- Rrqrsfffr Ffieffi S-{Qg{ O.1S
    - o-m|a-q qgm fr+{ro (wS Rnn) v{qg( w*rq B-{qgq orffiq qqq qfr qRs sftrrrcfi - fff,r{ ffi o.NisFfi ftci.F:- 2s.06.201s ors-sfriq retEr:- rrqrsfffr ffieffi s-{qg{ o.1s. sR.6qi6 qrq 3rtarq6/ftot or cH fudr $q{l q.q ftfq qqc s{ 1208/t971- ,iqfr 1i--qq ed frc Udr Gen 02-11-1964 2019-20 L 2014 3430n97r- qg \n'l Udr Gen 07-02-1964 2019-20 2 2014 4037/197t- lqdl \ti PGH Gen 18-02-1974 2019-20 20t4 tlc'{+ll {l(9 PGH (.'en 1 1-0'1-1965 2019-20 A 9982/1971- 201,4 1029IlI97t- ddi Tqr+r,/g1it fS6 {qmr Udr 10-02-1979 2019-20 5 2014 qlsqtfr orsT M 10398/t97t- qrs Bsw Gen 25-09-1982 2019-20 6 TR'or 20t4 1085111971- q61 w't o€ur ana vrqi Udr Gen 14-11-1988 2019-20 7 7 2014 10852/197t- t-qieli RTct 7 FrSv qnv wt Udr Gen 17-02-1989 2019-20 8 2014 t0869n97t- wrldi dq ara e-ergr Rie Udr Gen 12-10-1579 2019-20 J 7 2014 10936/1971- hdfr +fi-drd q.e Udr Gen 17 -01-1981 2019-20 10 Efi-dT / 20t4 10988/1971- .l\ltt qrqt('t / \t\n-q (I)+itt Udr Gen 01-07-1981 2019-20 1,1, 2014 3tq-.IIFI 11268/t97r- <rclrqqr / q t\cl Udr oBc 27-10-1984 2019-20 12 llqqr Ylqqt 2014 tt30211971- FgEIET sTci ,/ qmrl"T ara enf Udr 05-12-1976 2019-20 13 2014 11304/t971- ouifffl sqcq / tnq qiqR Udr Gen 18-10-1981 2019-20 L4 2014 qqrdq tt32ln97l- tildT eTqi / qc.elg vtct Udr Gen 05-09-1988 2019-20 2014 11575t1971- qurT dsrfi Z qroxm d'trft Udr r\p^ 08-02-1986 2019-20 -Lb 2014 1t622/r97t- gtre qgtcT dylqqc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4.Pdf
    University of Groningen Statistical inference in variance components models for biomedical applications Demetrashvili, Nino IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Demetrashvili, N. (2015). Statistical inference in variance components models for biomedical applications. University of Groningen. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 30-09-2021 Chapter 4 A generalized linear mixed model for meta-analysis of test-negative design case-control studies Nino Demetrashvili1;2, Maryam Darvishian1 and Edwin R.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum To
    MEMORANDUM TO: File No. S7-20-08; Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58190 FROM: Division of Trading and Markets DATE: July 31, 2008 RE: Meeting on Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-58166 On July 22, 2008, staff of the Division of Trading and Markets met with representatives from Overstock.com, Inc. to discuss Regulation SHO, “naked” short selling, and the Commission’s recent Emergency Order, (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34- 58166). Overstock followed-up this meeting by sending an e-mail attaching a letter which is included as an attachment to this Memorandum. July 23, 2008 Subject: Follow-up on July 22 Meeting Dr. Sirri et al.: I thank you for meeting with Ken Salomon, John Welborn and me yesterday afternoon to discuss Reg SHO, naked short selling and the SEC's recent emergency order. As a follow-up, I want to emphasize the following points: 1. OSTK continues to believe that it is critical that the SEC extend the pre-borrow requirement of the emergency order to the entire market, not just the 19 select companies. OSTK requests that the SEC promptly undertake swift rulemaking so that this protection applies fairly across the market. 2. OSTK continues to support the prompt and full elimination of the option market maker exception, an exception that swallows up the good intentions of Reg SHO. During yesterday's meeting, we discussed the relationship between the markets for equities and their corresponding derivatives (including listed options). You stated that options market makers enjoy an exception from the Reg SHO requirement that they locate and/or deliver shares when hedging against options positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking System Data Analysis Report Ranger VI1 Final Report
    'C 8 f' t Technical Report No. 32-779 Tracking System Data Analysis Report Ranger VI1 Final Report I A. L. Berman GPO PRICE $ OTS PRICE(S) $ Microfiche (MF) - 7s JET PROPULSION LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENAI CALIFORNIA June 1, 1965 c Technical Report No. 32-779 Tracking System Data Analysis Report Ranger VI1 Final Report A. L. Berman Richard K. Mallis, Manager Communications Engineering and Operations Section JET PROPULSION LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA,CALIFORNIA June 1, 1965 a Copyright c’ 1965 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Prepared Under Contract No. NAS 7-100 National Aeronautics & Space Administration # . JPL TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 32-719 CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..................... 1 A. History of the Mission ................. 1 B . System Configuration ................. 4 1. DSIF Stations ................... 4 2. Ground Station Tracking Modes ............ 9 3. Spacecraft Configuration ............... 9 I 4. Spacecraft Modes .................11 C . DataEvaluation ...................11 II . PerformanceAnalysis ................. 13 A . Preflight Calibrations ................. 13 1. Station 59 ................. ...14 2 . Station 51 ................. ...14 3. Station 41 .................... 14 B . Postflight Analysis of Station Performance During the Mission ...18 1. Station 59 .................... 19 2 . Station 51 .................. * . 19 3. Station 41 .................. i . 21 4. Station 12 ................. ...21 5.Summary .................. * *22 Appendixes ....................... 24 A . Listings of the Station Transmitter VCO Frequencies ......24 B . Residual Plots from the ODP ...............32 C. Hourly Trajectory Printout ...............47 D. Received Frequency Equations ..............84 TABLES 1. Nominal view periods vs actual tracking at DSIF stations ...... 1 2 . Ground commands sent to Ranger VI1 spacecraft by DSIF stations ... 2 3 . DSlFcapabilities and characteristics for Ranger VI! ........10 4 . Ground station tracking modes ...............12 5 .
    [Show full text]