DOCSLIB.ORG

Particularism and the Retreat from Theory in the Archaeology of Agricultural Origins Kristen J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Particularism and the Retreat from Theory in the Archaeology of Agricultural Origins Kristen J SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE SPECIAL FEATURE: Particularism and the retreat from theory in the archaeology of agricultural origins Kristen J. Gremilliona,1, Loukas Bartonb, and Dolores R. Pipernoc,d aDepartment of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210; bDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; cDepartment of Anthropology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013-7012; and dSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Panama, Republic of Panama Edited by James O’Connell, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved October 28, 2013 (received for review June 26, 2013) The introduction of new analytic methods and expansion of research into previously untapped regions have greatly increased the scale and resolution of data relevant to the origins of agriculture (OA). As a result, the recognition of varied historical pathways to agriculture and the continuum of management strategies have complicated the search for general explanations for the transition to food production. In this environment, higher-level theoretical frameworks are sometimes rejected on the grounds that they force conclusions that are incompatible with real-world variability. Some of those who take this position argue instead that OA should be explained in terms of local and historically contingent factors.This retreat from theory in favor of particularism is based on the faulty beliefs that complex phenomena such as agricultural origins demand equally complex explanations and that explanation is possible in the absence of theoretically based assumptions. The same scholars who are suspicious of generalization are reluctant to embrace evolutionary approaches to human behavior on the grounds that they are ahistorical, overly simplistic, and dismissive of agency and intent. We argue that these criticisms are misplaced and explain why a coherent theory of human behavior that acknowledges its evolutionary history is essential to advancing understanding of OA. Continued progress depends on the integration of human behavior and culture into the emerging synthesis of evolutionary developmental biology that informs contemporary research into plant and animal domestication. evolutionary theory | behavioral ecology Over the last decade there has been a major This trend, coupled with the critical stance In arguing for the systematic use of theory expansion of knowledge regarding the timing toward hypothetico-deductive science cur- as a tool for the advancement of knowledge, and socioecological context of plant domesti- rently influential in archaeological thought we are not making the claim that evolution- cation and emerging agricultural systems. (15), has motivated many archaeologists to arytheoryistheonlypossiblerealmfrom This wealth of data is due in large part to favor interpretive modes of explanation. In which to choose. However, neo-Darwinism methodological innovations (e.g., in genetics origins of agriculture (OA) research, one has withstood repeated challenges to its core and paleogenomics, in the analysis of plant result of this changing climate has been a elements, having earned status as an over- micro- and macroremains and biological res- proliferation of historical narratives that arching framework for explaining the di- idues, and in the physical and biogeochemical highlight local events and processes and versity of life. For this reason, evolutionary analyses of anthropogenic sediments), reex- downplay general principles. Although we theory is central to understanding the root cavations of some important archaeological recognize the value of empirical rigor, we causes of human behavior and indeed culture sites, and the expansion of archaeological re- argue that the progress of OA research is itself (16). An even stronger case for the evo- search into regions whose record of agricul- significantly hampered by the denial of lutionary perspective on human behavior can tural origins has been until recently poorly explanations derived from a systematic be made now that the distinctive features of known [such as New Guinea (1, 2), lowland program of theoretically driven hypothesis cultural transmission and evolution are be- areas of Mesoamerica and northern South testing. We also reject assertions that evo- coming more fully incorporated into the syn- America (3–7), and northern and southern lutionary theory is teleological, needlessly thesis (e.g., refs. 17–20). China (8–13)]. These research activities have reductionist, ahistorical, and therefore irrel- We divide our discussion of these issues enriched both the scale and resolution of the evant to understanding human behavior. into three sections. The first elaborates upon data relevant to agricultural origins world- Without a coherent theory of human behav- some of the weaknesses of particularism in wide. One result of this welcome enhance- ior, arguments about agricultural origins OA research. Next, we sharpen the focus ment of the empirical record is wider must rely on assumptions that are often in- to respond to critiques of evolutionary acknowledgment of the variability in the his- tuitive, unstated, and largely implicit. Cou- approaches to human behavior [particularly torical pathways taken by emerging food pro- pled with the increasing emphasis on the research program of human behavioral duction systems across space and time. The human exceptionalism, the erosion of scien- ecology (HBE) and one of its tools, optimal dichotomy between foraging and food pro- tific method is troubling because it creates foraging theory (OFT)]. We argue that recent duction has been discarded in favor of a con- a rift between researchers in biology and ar- calls to abandon HBE or OFT are misguided, tinuum of landscape, plant, and animal chaeology whose collaboration is essential to management strategies that sometimes resist advancing understanding of OA. To address Author contributions: K.J.G., L.B., and D.R.P. wrote the paper. fi classi cation. However, for some scholars (2, these weaknesses, we contend that evolution- The authors declare no conflict of interest. 14), the richly detailed records of change ary theory (broadly construed to include cul- This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. seem to have dampened the appeal of general tural as well as biological processes) must 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gremillion. explanations for the transition to agriculture. play a central role in OA research. [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1308938110 PNAS | April 29, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 17 | 6171–6177 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 and we explain why the particularist alter- (23). The result is a rejection of both uni- historical accounts of OA (see, for exam- natives might provide more explanatory versal causation and general principles in ple, refs. 25 and 29-32). However, to the depth and power when situated within favor of “frameworks of explanation that extent that they purport to engage in ex- a program of behavioral ecology. Finally, pay close and careful attention to existing planation, such accounts often rely on we assess the prospects for a synthetic relevant archaeological information, that inductions that are expected to stand on evolutionary research program for the are scaled at the regional level, and that the strength of available evidence alone. study of domestication and agriculture. focus on the complex interplay of a range of Although we recognize that the prioritiza- different environmental and social pre- tion of data is often intentional and explicitly Limitations of Particularism in OA conditions, prompts, and factors of various stated (e.g., ref. 33), we disagree that it is Research and the Need for Theory kinds” (ref. 23, p. 681). a good idea to abandon the iterative process The research trend that we critique in this We agree that no single cause explains all of hypothesis testing, revision, and retesting paper shares several characteristics with the instances of transition from foraging to food that drives incremental advances in scientific approach labeled historical particularism by production (25–27); this observation is true understanding. historians of anthropology (21). Most closely but trivial. An explanation that claims uni- associated with Franz Boas and his students, versal validity loses its universality when Particularistic Explanations Lack a General historical particularism emphasized the col- exceptions are found to exist. However, its Theory for the Evolution of Human Behavior lection and compilation of ethnographic data remaining components—variables, processes, Yet Rely on a General Theory of Evolution without the distorting effects of theory. Boas and assumptions— often remain relevant at for All Other Organisms. Thereislittledis- and his adherents, weary of unsubstantiated a more modest level of generality. The fatal agreement that change in the frequency of theorizing unsupported by rigorous field- flaw in the prime mover arguments is not attributes in populations of humans, animals work, viewed theory as an obstacle to scien- that they rely on overarching laws or and plants under domestication is inherently tific investigation. Generalizations about assumptions, but rather that they are ap- coevolutionary. Understanding this process culture were suspect because exceptions to plied at an inappropriate scale. Following requires a general theory that links change in them could always be found. Any reliable the same
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Photographic Presence in New Mexico
    Past, Present and Future: Photographic Presence in New Mexico Devorah Romanek A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, University College London (UCL), 2019 I, Devorah Romanek Confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Photograph on frontispiece: Will Wilson (2012). “Zig Jackson, Citizen of the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation, Professor of Photography, Savannah College of Art and Design.” Label text from the 2013 exhibition Toward a Critical Indigenous Photographic Exchange: Will Wilson’s CIPX at the Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, University of New Mexico: “Critical Indigenous Photographic Exchange, New Mexico Museum of Art, Santa Fe Indian Market, 2012. Archival pigment print from wet plate collodion scan. Jackson takes a picture of an Indian taking a picture of an Indian as Andrew Smith protects his soul from theft.” Photo credit: © Will Wilson, courtesy of the artist. ii Abstract This thesis investigates the relationship between historical ethnographic photographs of Native Americans, their disposition in archives and collections, and the relationship of those images to their contemporary circulation and use by Native American artists, and others, particularly in New Mexico. Having undertaken original research into mid-19th century photographs in archives internationally, pertaining to Native America in the American Southwest, new histories and a re- framing of the photographs in question has been assembled. This portion of the research was undertaken both as a starting point for further investigation, and as a return to the people of New Mexico, particularly the Indigenous inhabitants of that place.
    [Show full text]
  • Franz Boas's Legacy of “Useful Knowledge”: the APS Archives And
    Franz Boas’s Legacy of “Useful Knowledge”: The APS Archives and the Future of Americanist Anthropology1 REGNA DARNELL Distinguished University Professor of Anthropology University of Western Ontario t is a pleasure and privilege, though also somewhat intimidating, to address the assembled membership of the American Philosophical ISociety. Like the august founders under whose portraits we assemble, Members come to hear their peers share the results of their inquiries across the full range of the sciences and arenas of public affairs to which they have contributed “useful knowledge.” Prior to the profes- sionalization of science in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the boundaries between disciplines were far less significant than they are today. Those who were not experts in particular topics could rest assured that their peers were capable of assessing both the state of knowledge in each other’s fields and the implications for society. Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington were all polymaths, covering what we now separate into several kinds of science, humanities, and social science in ways that crosscut one another and illustrate the permeability of disciplinary boundaries. The study of the American Indian is a piece of that multidisciplinary heri- tage that constituted the APS and continues to characterize its public persona. The Founding Members of the Society all had direct and seminal experience with the Indians and with the conflict between their traditional ways of life and the infringing world of settler colonialism. On the one hand, they felt justified in exploiting Native resources, as surveyors, treaty negotiators, and land speculators. On the other hand, the Indians represented the uniqueness of the Americas, of the New World that defined itself apart from the decadence of old Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotations 1963-2005
    The Anthropological Caribbeana: Annotations 1963-2005 Lambros Comitas CIFAS Author Title Description Annotation Subject Headings 1977. Les Protestants de la Guadeloupe et la Les Protestants de la Guadeloupe et Author deals with origin of Protestants in Guadeloupe, their social situation, problem of property, and communauté réformée de Capesterre sous Abénon, Lucien la communauté réformée de maintenance of the religion into 18th century. Rather than a history of Protestantism in Guadeloupe, this is an GUADELOUPE. L'Ancien Régime. Bulletin de la Société Capesterre sous L'Ancien Régime. essay on its importance in the religiou d'Histoire de la Guadeloupe 32 (2):25-62. 1993. Caught in the Shift: The Impact of Industrialization on Female-Headed Caught in the Shift: The Impact of Households in Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles. Industrialization on Female-Headed Changes in the social position of women (specifically as reflected in marriage rates and percentages of Abraham, Eva In Where Did All the Men Go? Female- CURAÇAO. Households in Curaçao, Netherlands children born to unmarried mothers) are linked to major changes in the economy of Curaçao. Headed/Female-Supported Households in Antilles Cross-Cultural Perspective. Joan P. Mencher and Anne Okongwu 1976. The West Indian Tea Meeting: An With specific reference to "tea meetings" on Nevis and St. Vincent, author provides a thorough review of the The West Indian Tea Meeting: An Essay in Civilization. In Old Roots in New NEVIS. ST. VINCENT. Abrahams, Roger history and the development of this institution in the British Caribbean. Introduced by Methodist missionaries Essay in Civilization. Lands. Ann M. Pescatello, ed. Pp. 173-208.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.4 Historical Particularism
    UNIT 8 CLASSICAL THEORIES Contents 8.0 Introduction 8.1 The Beginning: Comparative Method and the Science ofSociety 8.2 ClassicalEvolutionaryTheory 8.3 ClassicalDiffusion Theory 8.4 HistoricalParticularism 8.5 Neo-Diffusionism 8.6 Neo-Evolutionism 8.7 Summary 8.8 References 8.9 Answers to Check Your Progress LEARNING OBJECTIVES In this unit, you willlearn about the following perspectives: the beginning: comparative method and the science of society; evolutionarytheory; diffusion theory; historicalparticularism; neo-evolution: multilinear evolutionand culturalecology; and neo-diffusion: culture area theory. 8.0 INTRODUCTION Anthropology starts as the Science of Man (quite literally as almost all the early scholars were white men). By the sixteenth century,the understanding that humans as a species are part of nature and controlled by its laws like any other species, animals or plants;had taken its roots. Since humans and societywere subject to the laws ofnature, theycould be studied byprinciples ofnaturalscience. In other words an objective, scientific studyofsocietywas possible.Although the human bodywas already an object of medical science, the position of human beings as a species in the schema ofnaturalevolution, were matters that needed academic attention. The most significant paradigmshift was froma religious perspective to a scientific or secular perspective. The scholarly approach was based upon ‘rationality’ and ‘evidence’; following an empirical methodology, where the physical evidence was complimented withdeductive reasoning. Contributor: Professor Subhadra Mitra Channa, Former Professor, Department of 107 Anthropology, University of Delhi Theoretical Perspectives 8.1 THE BEGINNING: COMPARATIVE METHOD AND THE SCIENCE OF SOCIETY Scientific method isbased uponobservation, experimentationand comparison. While inanimate objects can be easily subjected to, such as a process, humans in their societycan onlybe observed to a limited extent and cannot be experimented upon.
    [Show full text]
  • Frameworks of Analysis
    PART I Frameworks of Analysis INTRODUCTION Tony Bennett then examine the forms of cultural analysis that have been associated It is clear from our discussion in the general with the development of psychological and introduction that it is impossible to tie the sociological thought. Peter Burke’s discussion term ‘culture’ to a single concept or to a of cultural history provides a bridge into simple history of usage. It is better understood the next group of chapters focused mainly as referencing a network of loosely related on text-based disciplines. James English’s concepts that has been shaped by the relations account of the role that the analysis of form between the different histories and fields of has played in the development of literary usage with which the term has came to be studies is followed here by Tia DeNora’s entangled. A significant factor here has been consideration of music as both text and the different meanings deriving from the ways performance. Mieke Bal then examines the in which the concept has been used and relations between art history and the more interpreted in the social science disciplines recent development of visual culture studies. one the one hand and in the humanities The next two chapters – Tom Gunning’s on the other. These different disciplinary discussion of film studies and Toby Miller’s articulations of the concept are the focus account of broadcasting – are concerned with of the contributions composing this first the forms of cultural analysis that have been part of the book, which also assesses how developed in relation to the two main media the ‘cultural turn’ has affected developments systems of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS of the MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES on INTERPRETATIONS of MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY by E
    A HALLOWED PATH: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES ON INTERPRETATIONS OF MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY By ERIC DAVID SINGLETON Bachelor of Arts/Science in History The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2003 Master of Arts/Science in Museum Studies The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 2008 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2017 A HALLOWED PATH: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MUTABLE PERSPECTIVES ON INTERPRETIONS OF MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ICONOGRAPHY Dissertation Approved: Dr. L.G. Moses Dr. William S. Bryans Dr. Michael M. Smith Dr. F. Kent Reilly, III Dr. Stephen M. Perkins ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is true that nothing in this world is done alone. I would like to thank my family and friends for all their love and support. My grandparents, parents, sister, cousin, aunts and uncles. They were the foundation of everything that has shaped my life and allowed me the strength to complete this while working full-time. And, to my fiancée Kimberly. I mention her separately, not because she is not included above, but because she is the one person who diligently edited, listened, and gracefully sat by giving up years of vacations, holidays, and parties as I spent countless nights quietly writing. I would also give the most heartfelt thank you to Dr. Moses, Dr. McCoy, and Dr. Smith. Each of you made me the historian I am today. As Dr. James Ronda told me once, pick your professors, not the school—they will shape everything.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Anthropological Theories
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 10(1); August 2014 An Overview of the Anthropological Theories Nurazzura Mohamad Diah Head Department of Sociology & Anthropology International Islamic University Malaysia Dewan Mahboob Hossain Associate Professor Department of Accounting & Information Systems University of Dhaka Bangladesh Sohela Mustari PhD Student Department of Sociology & Anthropology International Islamic University Malaysia Noor Syafika Ramli Master in Anthropology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Abstract Theories are treated as the lifeblood of the disciplines like sociology and anthropology. As a newer discipline that has grown approximately over the last two hundred years, anthropology has proposed different important theories on man and culture. This article presents with an overview of the theories of anthropology developed over the last two hundred years. This can be considered as a general summarized reading of the important anthropological theories like evolutionism, diffusionism, historical particularism, functionalism, culture and personality, structuralism, neo-evolutionism, cultural ecology, cultural materialism, postmodernist and feminist explanations. This article concludes that though each of these theories was criticized by the subsequent theorists, all these theories contributed a lot in the development of anthropology as a discipline. Keywords: anthropology, theory, anthropological theory 1.0. Introduction In the academic arena, anthropology is considered as a relatively new discipline as its major development mainly happened in the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries. Though, in France and Germany, this discipline got a momentum in the seventeenth and the eighteenth centuries in different names (like ethnology, Volkskunde, Volkerkunde etc.), in English, the word ‘anthropology’ first appeared in the year of 1805 (McGee and Warms, 2012; 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology (ANTH) 1
    Anthropology (ANTH) 1 Anthropology (ANTH) Courses ANTH 0814. Human Ecology. 3 Credit Hours. The study of human ecology focuses on understanding how ecosystems affect, and are affected by, human biology, behavior, technology and social organization. Students will learn about basic ecological principles, and the way humans have adapted both culturally and biologically to different ecosystems. We will explore ecological models for the origin of human cooperation, human cultural diversity and social complexity - and investigate how limited ecosystem resources ignite competition among humans and human groups. We will review the evidence for significant past environmental changes caused by people living in simple societies; and how ancient civilizations often caused irreparable collapses of their ecosystem. We will conclude by examining modern climate change, and the impact that recent changes have had on resources in different ecosystems, as well as on the sustainability of local indigenous societies and nation states. NOTE: Students cannot receive credit for this course if they have successfully completed GUS 0814. Course Attributes: GB Repeatability: This course may not be repeated for additional credits. ANTH 0815. Language in Society. 3 Credit Hours. How did language come about? How many languages are there in the world? How do people co-exist in countries where there are two or more languages? How do babies develop language? Should all immigrants take a language test when applying for citizenship? Should English become an official language of the United States? In this course we will address these and many other questions, taking linguistic facts as a point of departure and considering their implications for our society.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Determination IQ and Emotional Intelligence: Concepts For
    Self-determination IQ and Emotional Intelligence: Concepts for Identifying, Understanding and Developing Strategies to Deal with Cultural Competency, Diversity, Inclusion and Implicit Bias in Mediation The importance of addressing cultural competency, diversity and bias is to stress the need to become self-aware, create self-recognition, and proactively implement debiasing strategies and actions. As more individuals accept these premises, culture, society and group or organizational dynamics will also develop a stronger cultural competency, diversity and debiasing practices. Identifying, understanding and proactively acting upon issues of cultural diversity, inclusion and biases are fundamental to serving as a neutral mediator, charged with facilitating negotiations for parties in conflict in hopes of reaching a negotiated outcome – mediation. Mastering cultural competency and debiasing skills, at any level, like playing the piano, is not accomplished in one lesson. It is a conscious practice on a regular or daily basis, in an on-going manner. A cornerstone of mediation (facilitated negotiation) is “self-determination.” In fact, it is the first standard stated in the ABA Model Standards for Mediators (2005): STANDARD I. SELF-DETERMINATION A. A mediator shall conduct a mediation based on the principle of party self- determination. Self- determination is the act of coming to a voluntary, uncoerced decision in which each party makes free and informed choices as to process and outcome. Parties may exercise self-determination at any stage of a mediation, including mediator selection, process design, participation in or withdrawal from the process, and outcomes. 1. Although party self-determination for process design is a fundamental principle of mediation practice, a mediator may need to balance such party self-determination with a mediator’s duty to conduct a quality process in accordance with these Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 1 Classical Theories
    UNIT 1 CLASSICAL THEORIES Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Evolutionary Theories of Anthropology 1.2.1 Early Evolutionists 1.2.2 Contributors to the Theory of Evolution: Major Anthropological Works 1.2.3 Criticisms 1.2.4 Neo Evolutionism 1.3 Diffusionism 1.3.1 British Diffusionist School 1.3.2 German Diffusionist School 1.3.3 American Diffusionist School 1.4 School of Historical Particularism 1.5 Summary References Suggested Reading Sample Questions Learning Objectives It is expected that after reading this unit, you will be able to discuss the: classical theories; followers of the theories and their approach to the study of human beings; and criticisms that have followed these theories. 1.1 INTRODUCTION Distant land, society, cultures, customs, rituals etc have always fascinated humankind as they wanted to know how these came into existence and how they differ from their own society. In the works of ancient travelers and historians like Heun Sung, these aspects have been reflected long before Anthropology came up as a subject. Herodotus (c.484-425 BC) a historian mainly remembered for his history of the Persian wars wrote detailed accounts of his travels. These early works, although they contained reflections on society could not be completely termed as anthropological. Works which focused on human beings and their society basically belonged to two genres: travelers writing their travel accounts and social philosophers propounding their theories. Eriksen (2008) has rightly stated that it is only when travel accounts (data) and philosophical thinking (theory) is integrated, Anthropology as a subject emerges. In this Unit the discussion would pertain to some of the works before anthropology emerged as a theory and then move on to the theories that were being postulated when Anthropology was emerging as a subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Ida Halpern: a Post-Colonial Portrait of a Canadian Pioneer Ethnomusicologist Kenneth Chen
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 6:46 a.m. Canadian University Music Review Revue de musique des universités canadiennes Ida Halpern: A Post-Colonial Portrait of a Canadian Pioneer Ethnomusicologist Kenneth Chen Voices of Women: Essays in Honour of Violet Archer Article abstract Voix de femmes : mélanges offerts à Violet Archer The work of Ida Halpern (1910–87), one of Canada's first musicologists and a Volume 16, Number 1, 1995 pioneer ethnomusicologist, has been largely ignored. This essay illuminates her most important contribution to the musical development of this country: URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1014415ar the documentation of Native musics. Halpern devoted some four decades to DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1014415ar recording and analyzing over five hundred songs of the Kwakwaka'wakw, the Nuuchahnulth, the Haida, the Nuxalk, and the Coast Salish First Nations of British Columbia—a truly remarkable achievement considering that a large See table of contents part of her fieldwork was conducted during a period when it was illegal for Native cultures to be celebrated, much less preserved. The author discusses the strengths and weaknesses of her methodology as well as some factors affecting Publisher(s) the reception of her work by academic peers and by the communities she worked with. While Halpern did not always thoroughly investigate context, she Canadian University Music Society / Société de musique des universités endeavoured to write heteroglossically and to invent a theory that accounted canadiennes for the music of these songs. ISSN 0710-0353 (print) 2291-2436 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Chen, K.
    [Show full text]
  • (How Evolution Came to Be a Dirty Word in Cultural Anthropology and Archaeology) Lecture 4
    Slide 1 The Rejection of Cultural Evolution (How Evolution Came to be a Dirty Word in Cultural Anthropology and Archaeology) Lecture 4 Slide 2 Early Twentieth Century Saw Two New Schools of Thought •United States –Historical Particularism •Franz Boas •A. L. Kroeber •United Kingdom –Structural-Functionalism •B. Malinowski •A. R. Radcliffe-Brown Slide 3 Historical Particularism The view that each culture is the product of a unique sequence of development in which chance plays a major role in bringing about change. Advocates a detailed descriptive approach instead of a broad generalizing approach. Slide 4 Characteristics of Historical Particularism •Cultural Relativism •Historical- Ideographic •Inductive •Emphasize Fieldwork •Environmental Possibilism •Culture as Superorganic Slide 5 Key Figure Franz Boas •Father of American Anthropology •First ethnographic work among the Eskimo of Baffin Island •Born in Germany- emigrated to the United States 1886 •Studied the Kwakiutl of northern Vancouver Island BC. •Founded first Anthropology Department in America- Columbia Slide 6 Boas Attacks Comparative Method •Urged rejection of comparative method •Undercut by three flaws –Assumption of unilinear evolution –Notion of modern societies as evolutionary survivals –Classifications based on weak data and inappropriate criteria Slide 7 •3 factors for explaining the variability and origins of customs •environmental conditions •psychological factors •historical connections •Of the three, History is most important Slide 8 •supported biological evolution but
    [Show full text]