The Pairing of Barbarian and Scythian in Col 3:11 Poses Difficult Exegetical Problems
THE SCYTHIAN PERSPECTIVE IN COL 3:11 by TROY MARTIN Chicago The pairing of barbarian and Scythian in Col 3:11 poses difficult exegetical problems. Each of the other pairs in this verse describe mutually exclusive categories such as Greek/Jew, circum- cised/uncircumcised, and slave/free In the opinion of many exegetes, the categories of barbarian and Scythian are not mutually exclusive but overlapping.1 In Greco-Roman literature, Scythians are either hailed as the noblest or the most backward of barbarians.2 In either assessment, the term Scythian belongs to the category of barbarian according to the dominant usage of the terms from a Greek perspective. 1 Petr Pokorny concludes, "The next couple of terms is not an antithesis but an escalation barbarian-Scythian" (Colossians [Peabody, MA Hendrickson, 1991] 170) Peter Τ O'Brien observes, "The list of terms overlaps somewhat 'Barbarian' and 'Scythian' are not contrasted like 'Greek' and 'Jew,' or 'bond man' and 'freeman ' Rather, they stand over against 'Greek' when the latter is used in its cultural sense" (Colossians, Philemon [Word Biblical Commentary 44, Waco Word, 1982] 193) 2 The positive assessment of Scythians considers them to be a simple, nomadic people living apart from the ills that afflicted Greco-Roman civilization Strabo says, "In fact, even now there are Wagon-dwellers and Nomads, so called, who life off their herds, and on milk and cheese and know nothing about storing up food or about peddling merchandise either, except the exchange of wares for wares How, then, could the
[Show full text]