PI. IS, Figs. 8, 10-19 Aff. Anomalum, Clitendoceras

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PI. IS, Figs. 8, 10-19 Aff. Anomalum, Clitendoceras INDEX* acutisulcata, Syntrophinella, 24, 124-125; PI. Big Spring anticline, 15, 16 IS, figs. 8, 10-19 Big Spring Station member, 14, 15 aff. anomalum, Clitendoceras, 135 Biotite, 34 Albite, 34 Black, Maurice, 36, 39 Algal limestone Black Rock formation, 27, 32 conditions of deposition of, 48 Blackford formation, 32 description of, 36-39 Brachiopoda, 112-127 distribution of, 36 Bradley, W. H., 38 origin of, 36-39 Brainerd, Ezra, 18 stromatolite types in, 36-39 Bridge, Josiah, 25, 30 alticostellata, Tritoechia, 118; PI. 13, figs. bridgei, Finkelnburgia, 20, 113; PI. 12, figs. 27, 30-36 18-24 alturensis, Lecanospira, 130 Broedel, C. H., 9 annulata?, Archaeoscyphia, 25, 26, 110-111; Butts, Charles, 28 PI. 9, figs. 1-4 anomalum, Clitendoceras, 135 Calcarenite, 19, 31, 38, 40, 47 anomalum, Ellesmeroceras (Metaellesmero- Calciferous sandrock, 18 ceras), 20 Calcilutite, 39 Anthozoa, 111-112 Calliglypha, 123 Antietam sandstone, 5 Cambro-Ordovician boundary, 16 Archaeocyathus minganensis, 110 capuliformis, Ceratopea, 25, 26, 127: PI. 11, Archaeoscyphia, 25, 26, 110 figs. 27, 28, 32, 33 annulata?, 25, 26, 110-111; PI. 9, figs. 1-4 cariniferum, Mcqueenoceras, 135 fauna, 25, 26 Cassin minganensis, 110 fauna, 18 zone, 25, 26, 38 strata, 27 armanda, Finkelnburgia, 113, 114 cassina, Hormotoma, 129 Arthropoda, 135-138 cassina, Murchisonia, 130 Axemann formation, 7 Cephalopoda, 135 Ceratopea Barnes, V. E„ 41, 46, 47 capuliformis, 25, 26, 127; PI. 11, figs. 27, Bassler, R. S., 5, 15, 22, 26, 45 28, 32, 33 Bathyurus conicus, 136 cf. pygmaea, 128; PI. 11, figs. 29-31 Beekmantown n. sp., 25, 127-128; PI. 11, figs. 24-26 history of sedimentation, 48 pygmaea, 27, 128 use of the term, 18 sp., 134; PI. 12, figs. 3, 6, 12 bella, Polytoechia, 27, 117 zone, 5 bellatula, Finkelnburgia, 20, 113 cf. cassina, Hormotomaf, 25, 27, 129-130; Bellefonte dolomite, 7, 27, 32 PI. 11, figs. 16, 17 Beliefontia cf. confusa, Hormotoma?, 25, 129; PI. 11, chamberlaini, 136 fig. 18 collieana, 20, 135-136; PI. 10, figs. 4, 5, cf. minor, Syntrophopsis, 25, 126; PI. 15, 7-10 figs. 34-36 fauna, 19, 20 cf. Ophileta, 24 nonius, 136 cf. pygmaea, Ceratopea, 128; PI. 11, figs. 29- biconcava, Lecanospira, 130 31 •Figures in boldface type indicate detailed description or discussion. 155 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/955652/mem68-bm.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 156 BEEKMANTOWN GROUP OF MARYLAND cf. salteri, Lecanospira, 24, 132; PI. 12, fig. distribution, 14 1 lithologic character, 14 cf. tubulata, Tritoechia, 120-121; PI. 14, figs. name, 14 13-16 stratigraphie position of arenaceous zones cf. woosteri, Symphysurina, 137; PL 11, figs. in, 15 1, 2 thickness, 16 chamberlaini, Bellefontia, 136 upper contact, 15-16 Chambersburg limestone, 9, 16 Conococheague syncline, 8, 9, 10, 17, 21, 28 Charlton anticline, IS convexus, Obolus?, 20, 112-113; PL 12, figs. Chazy limestone, 18, 32 13-17 Chert Cooper, B. N., 32 cauliflower, 5 Cooper, G. A., 20, 32 cryptozoon, 21, 45 cooperi, Syntrophinella, 24, 125; PL 15, figs. irregular, 21, 28, 40, 43-44 20-28 nodular, 21, 40, 44-45 Copper Ridge dolomite, 38 Chlorite, 34 Coreanoceras, 25 Cincinnati arch, 47 costellatum, Diparelasma, 115 Clarke, J. M., 18 Cotter formation, 27 Clarkellidae, 124-126 Crustacea, 138 Classification Crustal shortening, 1, 12-13 lithologic, 33-45 Cryptozoon chert paleontologic, 109 description of, 45 Cleavage, 8, 10 distribution of, 45 Clelandia, 16, 20 origin of, 45 Clelandoceras, 27 zone, 20, 21, 24 sp., 25, 135 Cryptozoon steeli, 45 Clitambonacea, 116-121 zone, 5 Clitendoceras, 24, 25, 26 Cryptozoon stromatolites anomalum, 135 description of, 38-39 aff. anomalum, 135 distribution of, 39 Cloos, Ernst, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 Cullison, J. S., 27 Cloud, P. E., Jr., 36, 38, 41, 46, 47 curvirostris, Tritoechia, 117, 118-119; Pl. 14, cloudi, Lichenaria, 26, 111-112; PL 10, figs. figs. 1-12 1,6 Cushing, H. P., 18 Coelenterata, 111-112 collieana, Bellefontia, 20, 135-136; Pl. 10, Dakeoceras? sp., 20 figs. 4, 5, 7-10 deckeri, Syntrophinella, 125 collieana, Hemigyraspis, 135 delicatula, Tetralobula, 122 compacta, Lecanospira, 131 delicatula, Tritoechia, 27, 118 compacta, Ophileta, 131 Deposition compacta?, Lecanospira, 24, 131-132; PL 12, conditions of, 47-48 figs. 2, 4, 5 environment of, 45-47 concentrica, Doloresella, 25, 123; PL 14, figs. history of, 48 37-45 source of sediments, 47 conferta, Lecanospira, 130 depressum, Retroclitendoceras, 135 confusa, Murchisonia?, 129 Diaphelasma, 24, 123 Conglomerate, flat-pebble, 14, 15, 19 oklahomense, 124 conicus, Bathyurus, 136 pennsylvanicum, 24, 26, 115, 124; Pl. 15, Conocochcaguc formation figs. 1-7, 9 age, 16 Diparelasma, 25, 27 * Figures in boldface type indicate detailed description or discussion. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/955652/mem68-bm.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 INDEX 157 costellatum, 115 Foltz anticlinorium, 8 fauna, 25, 27 Fossils marylandicum, 115; Pl. 13, figs. 13-19 abundance of, 109 silicum, 116 classification of, 109 subquadratum, 115-116; PL 13, figs. 6-12 distortion of, 109 Dolomite nature of preservation of, 109 laminated, 40-41 repositories for, 110 member of Rockdale Run formation, 22 stratigraphie range of, 109-110 mottled, 40 Franconia equivalent in Conococheague for- Dolomitization, 22, 24, 30, 35, 40 mation, 16 stages of, 43 time of, 43 Garden City formation, 21 Doloresella, 25, 122-123 Gasconade concéntrica, 25, 123; Pl. 14, figs. 37-45 dolomite, 1, 25 Dresbach equivalent in Conococheague for- equivalent, 26 mation, 16 fauna, 20, 25 Gasconadia putilla, 20, 128-129; Pl. 11, figs. Ecculiomphalus, 20, 24 11-15 sp., 128; PI. 11, fig. 23 Gastropoda, 127-135 Eccyliomphalus, 20 Geiger, H. R., 5 Echinodermata, 112 genalatus, Hystricurus, 136 El Paso limestone, 26, 27 Genesis of lithologies, 33-48 Elbrook formation, 14 Geologic sections, 49-100 elegantula, Orospira, 27, 134 Ginsberg, R. N., 35, 43, 46 Ellesmeroceras (Metaellesmeroceras) globosa, piectotrophia, 121-122; PL 14, figs. anomalum, 20 17-27 Environment of deposition, 45-47 Gorman Escharendo ceras, 24, 25 equivalent of El Paso limestone, 26 simplex, 135 formation, 26 sp., 135 gracile, Platysiphon, 135 gracilis, Murchisonia, 129 Faulting, 8-10 gymnosolenid stromatolites, 14, 15-16, 19 Feldspar, 34 description of, 36-38 Finkelnburgia, 24, 25 distribution of, 38 armanda, 113, 114 bellatula, 20, 113 Hastings Creek formation, 26 bridgei, 20, 113; PI. 12, figs. 18-24 Hatch, F. H., 36 sp., 25 Helicotoma uniangulata, 20 stonehengensis, 20, 113-114; PI. 12, figs. Hemigyraspis collieana, 135 25-32 Hintze, L. F., 21 virginica, 24, 26, 114-115; PL 13, figs. 1-5 Honeycut formation, 26 wemplei, 113 Hormotoma, 129 Finkelnburgia? sp., 16 Hormotoma? Finkelnburgiidae, 113-116 cf. H. cassina, 25, 27, 129-130; Pl. 11, figs. Fisher, D. W., 18, 47 16, 17 flectimembrus, Hystricurus, 137 cf. H. confusa, 25, 129; Pl. 11, fig. 18 Flexure folding, 1, 12 Huenellidae, 121-122 Flowage, eifect of on stratigraphie thickness, Hystricurus, 20, 24, 136 10-12 flectimembrus, 137 Flower, R. H„ 7, 26 genalatus, 136 * Figures in boldface type indicate detailed description or discussion. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/955652/mem68-bm.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 158 BEEKMANTOWN GROUP OF MARYLAND Hystricurus (cont'd) Lesueurilla, 27, 132 paragenalatus, 136 Lesueurilla?, 25 s. 1., 26,136 sp., 132; PI. 11, fig. 19 sp. 20, 136-137; PI. 11, fig. 4 Lichenaria, 24 Hystricurus? sp., 137; PI. 11, fig. 3 cloudi, 26, 111-112; PI. 10, figs. 1, 6 simplex, 26, 112 Illite-group minerals, 34 Limestone Imbricatia, 123 algal, 36-39 incurva, Tritoechia, 118 laminated, 39 Irregular chert laminated dolomitic, 41-42 description of, 43-44 mechanical, 33-35 distribution of, 44 mottled dolomitic, 42-43 origin of, 44 oolitic, 35-36 structureless, 39-40 Jeiferson City equivalent of El Paso lime- Lithistida, 110 stone, 26 Lithologies, classification and genesis of, 33- 48 Keith, Arthur, 5 Lobosiphon, 25 Kindblade formation, 27 Localities, fossil, 100-108 Long, M. B„ 16, 34 lamellata, Stichotrophia, 126 Longview formation, 7, 26 Laminated dolomite Lower Ordovician-Middle Ordovician bound- conditions of deposition of, 48 ary, 32 description of, 40-41 Lytospira sp., 20, 132-133; PI. 11, figs. 20-22 distribution of, 41 origin of, 41 Macluritella, 24 Laminated dolomitic limestone marylandica, 24, 133; PI. 11, figs. 6-8, 10 conditions of deposition of, 48 sp., 133-134; PI. 11, fig. 9 description of, 41-42 stantoni, 133 distribution of, 42 Marmor stage, 32 origin of, 42 Martinsburg shale, 4, 5, 8, 9 Laminated limestone marylandica, Macluritella, 24, 133; PI. 11, conditions of deposition of, 48 figs. 6-8, 10 description of, 39 marylandicum, Diparelasma, 115; PL 13, distribution of, 39 figs. 13-19 origin of, 39 marylandicum, Oneotoceras?, 20 Lecanospira, 24, 25, 130-131 Massanutten synclinorium, 8, 17 alturensis, 130 Mcqueenoceras, 24, 25, 26 biconcava, 130 cariniferum, 135 cf. L. salteri, 24, 132; PI. 12, fig. 1 Mechanical limestone compacta, 130, 131 conditions of deposition of, 48 compacta?, 24, 131-132; Pl. 12, figs. 2, description of, 33-35 5 distribution of, 33 conferta, 130 origin of, 35 fauna, 24 Microcline, 34 nerine, 130 minganensis, Archaeocyathus, 110 salteri, 130, 132 minganensis, Archaeoscyphia, 110 sigmoidea, 130 minor, Syntrophopsis, 27, 126 sp., 132 mohawkensis, Murchisonia, 128, 129; PL 11, zone, 14, 25, 26, 35, 45, 131 fig. 13 * Figures in boldface type indicate detailed description or discussion. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/955652/mem68-bm.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 INDEX 159 Mollusca, 127-135 Orthacea, 113-116 Mons formation, 21 Orthoclase, 34 Moore, E. S., 28 Mottled dolomite Palaeostrophiinae, 121-122 description of, 40 Paleogeography, 45-48 distribution of, 40 Paleontology, systematic, 109-138 origin of, 40 paragenalatus, Hystricurus, 136 Mottled dolomitic limestone Parahystricurus, 136 description of, 42-43 Pelmatozoa, 112 distribution of, 42 pennsylvanica, Tritoechia, 27, 118 origin of, 42-43 pennsylvanicum, Diaphelasma, 24, 26, 115, Murchisonia 124; PL 15, figs.
Recommended publications
  • Open-File Report No. 2008-02-18 Phase 2 Study Of
    Maryland Department of Natural Resources Resource Assessment Service MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Jeffrey P. Halka, Acting Director OPEN-FILE REPORT NO. 2008-02-18 PHASE 2 STUDY OF THE AREA CONTRIBUTING GROUNDWATER TO THE SPRING SUPPLYING THE A.M. POWELL STATE FISH HATCHERY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND by Mark T. Duigon Prepared in cooperation with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Service 2009 CONVERSION FACTORS AND ABBREVIATIONS The following factors may be used to convert the inch-pound units published in this report to International System (SI) units. Multiply By To obtain inch (in.) 2.54 (exact) centimeter (cm) foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2) gallon (gal) 3.785 liter (L) cubic feet per second (ft3/s) 0.02832 cubic meters per second (m3/s) million gallons per day (Mgal/d) 3785 cubic meters per day (m3/d) ii CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose and scope ....................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................... 2 HYDROLOGY AND GROUNDWATER TRACING ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician, in CH Shultz Ed, the Geology of Pennsylvania
    SCALE :ii! o 10 20 30 40 50 MI I 'i I' "i' , o 20 40 60 80 KM 41 40 ' EXPLANATION ~ l1li Ordovician rocks in subsurface Autochthonous OrdOllician rocks at surface Hamburg klippe Figure 5-1. Distribution of Ordovician sedimentary rocks In Pennsylvania west of the Martie Line (modified from Berg and others, 1980, and Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 1990). Part II. Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Tectonics CHAPTERS ORDOVICIAN ALLAN M. THOMPSON INTRODUCTION Department of Geology University of Delaware This chapter contains a summary of lithologic, Newark, DE 19716 facies, and temporal relationships of sedimentary rocks of Ordovician age in Pennsylvania west and northwest of the Martie Line (Figure 5-1). Ordovician sedimentary rocks occur only in the subsurface of northern and western Pennsylvania (Fettke, 1961; Wagner, 1966b) and crop out in cen­ tral and southeastern Pennsylvania (Figure 5-1). In central and south-central Pennsylvania, the Ridge and Valley belt contains a nearly complete Ordovician section. The Great Valley contains predominantly Lower and Middle Ordovician strata. The east-central part of the Great Valley contains allochthonous Cam­ brian to Middle Ordovician rocks of the Hamburg klippe; these rocks have been compared to the Ta­ conian allochthons of eastern New York and western New England (Rodgers, 1970; Lash and others, 1984). The Piedmont Lowland contains carbonates and shale of Early and possibly Middle Ordovician age (Gobn, 1978). Possibly coeval rocks of the Glenarm Super­ group, which occur southeast of the Martic Line (Fig­ ure 5-1), are penetratively deformed and variably metamorphosed (see Chapters 3A and 4). Some were assigned Early Ordovician ages by Berg, McInerney, and others (1986), but the evidence is equivocal.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornl/Tm--12074
    ORNL/TM--12074 DE93 007798 Environmental Sciences Division STATUS REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE OAK RIDGE RESERVATION Robert D. Hatcher, Jr.1 Coordinator of Report Peter J. Lemiszki 1 RaNaye B. Dreier Richard H. Ketelle 2 Richard R. Lee2 David A. Lietzke 3 William M. McMaster 4 James L. Foreman _ Suk Young Lee Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 3860 1Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-1410 2Energy Division, ORNL 3Route 3, Rutledge, Tennessee 37861 41400 W. Raccoon Valley Road, HeiskeU, Tennessee 37754 Date Published--October 1992 Prepared for the Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (Budget Activity EW 20 10 30 1) Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6285 managed by MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under contract DE-AC05-84OR21400 _)ISTRIBUTIOi4 O;- THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED% TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 History of Geologic and Geohydrologic Work at ORNL .......................... 5 1.2 Regional Geologic Setting .............................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Physiography ..................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................... 7 2. AVAILABLE DATA ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clinchport Quadrangle Virginia
    COMMON\VEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE CLINCHPORT QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA WILLIAM B. BRENT REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 5 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGI NIA 1963 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE CLINCHPORT QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA WILLIAM B. BRENT REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 5 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1963 Comnorywrer,ru or VrncrNre DnpenruoNr oF PrtRcEAsEa aND Suppr,y Rrcs:uoNo 1963 DNPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DE\IELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia Menvnr M. Surnnnr,eNo, Director A. S. Recuer,, JR., Erecutiae Assistant BOARD G. Ar,vrx MessoNeuRc, Hampton, Chairman Syorvoy F. Suer,r,, Roanoke, Vice-Chairman A. Pr,rnurpr Bnrnxn, Orange WonrsrNcrox Feur,rnrn, Glasgow Cenr,rsr,n H. Huurcr,srwn, Williamsburg Genr,eNn E. Moss, Chase City Enrvpsr LnB Surrn, Grundy Vrcron W. Srpwenr, Petersburg Wrr,r,relr P. Woonr,ny. Norfolk CONTENTS Pecn Abstract. .'........ I Introduction. 2 Location and size of area. .. -..... 2 Geography. ... 6) Acknowledgments s Stratigraphy...... 3 Cambrian system o Rome formation 5 Rutledse limestone. I t0 Rogersi'ille shale. , Maryville limestone. l0 Nolichucky formation. t2 Maynardville formation. l5 Copper Ridge formation. 17 Ordovician system. 18 Chepultepec formation. l8 Longview and Kingsport formations, undivided . l9 Mascot formation. l9 Blackford formation. 21 Elway limestone oo 23 Iincolnshire limestone . Rye Cove limestone, new. 94 Rockdelllimestone. .. .. 25 Benbolt and Wardell li-estones. ,tnairrid"d 25 Bowenformation...... ad Wittenlimestone....
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources
    COMMISSION OF MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY S. JAMES CAMPBELL Towson RICHARD W. COOPER Salisbury JOHN C. GEYER Baltimore ROBERT C. HARVEY Frostburg M. GORDON WOLMAN Baltimore PREFACE In 1906 the Maryland Geological Survey published a report on "The Physical Features of Maryland", which was mainly an account of the geology and min- eral resources of the State. It included a brief outline of the geography, a more extended description of the physiography, and chapters on the soils, climate, hydrography, terrestrial magnetism and forestry. In 1918 the Survey published a report on "The Geography of Maryland", which covered the same fields as the earlier report, but gave only a brief outline of the geology and added chap- ters on the economic geography of the State. Both of these reports are now out of print. Because of the close relationship of geography and geology and the overlap in subject matter, the two reports were revised and combined into a single volume and published in 1957 as Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources. The Bulletin has been subsequently reprinted in 1961 and 1966. Some revisions in statistical data were made in the 1961 and 1968 reprints. Certain sections of the Bulletin were extensively revised by Dr. Jona- than Edwards in this 1974 reprint. The Introduction, Mineral Resources, Soils and Agriculture, Seafood Industries, Commerce and Transportation and Manu- facturing chapters of the book have received the most revision and updating. The chapter on Geology and Physiography was not revised. This report has been used extensively in the schools of the State, and the combination of Geology and Geography in one volume allows greater latitude in adapting it to use as a reference or textbook at various school levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955
    Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955 ^GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A Names of North America Introduced in 1936-1955 By DRUID WILSON, WILLIAM J. SANDO? and RUDOLPH W. KOPF Prepared with the assistance of BARBARA BEDETTE, JEAN L. EGGLETON, GRACE C. KEROHER, CAROLYN MANN, WILLIAM G. MELTON, JR., KATHERINE DENNISON PALMER, and JACK E. SMEDLEY GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA -G E O L O G I C AL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A A compilation of new geologic names of North America, including Greenland, the finest Indies, the Pacific Island pos­ sessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director ' For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1. (paper cover) FOEEWOBD The "Lexicon of geologic names of the United States" by M. Grace Wilmarth, published in 1938 and reprinted in 1951 and 1957, met a long standing need and continuing demand for a compilation of geologic names. Plans made for future compilations as new names and revisions appeared were interrupted during the years of World War II. In 1952 a sustained effort was begun toward review of geo­ logic publications necessary to furnish a background for preparation of a new edition. After the review was brought up to date in 1956, the present compilation was prepared in order to furnish to the geo­ logic profession, as quickly as possible, some of the essential data concerning the new names that have appeared since 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • Usgs Sir 2007-5066
    Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow in the Leetown Area, West Virginia Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5066 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow in the Leetown Area, West Virginia By Mark D. Kozar, David J. Weary, Katherine S. Paybins, and Herbert A. Pierce Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5066 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Kozar, M.D., Paybins, K.S., Weary, D.J., and Pierce, H.A., 2007, Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow in the Leetown Area, West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5066. iii Contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Purpose and Scope . 2 Methods of Study .
    [Show full text]
  • Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report
    ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE and DOMINION ENERGY TRANSMISSION, INC. SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT Implementation Plan EC26 Attachment 1 Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Dominion ACP Augusta, Bath and Highland Counties, Virginia & Pocahontas and Randolph Counties, West Virginia August 30, 2017 19955 Highland Vista Drive, Suite 170 Ashburn, Virginia 20147 703-726-8030 19955 Highland Vista Dr., Suite 170 Ashburn, Virginia 20147 (703) 726-8030 www.geoconcepts-eng.com August 30, 2017 Colin Olness, PE Contractor Atlantic Coast Pipeline - Construction 99 Edmiston Way Buckhannon, WV 26201 Subject: Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Dominion ACP, Augusta, Bath and Highland Counties, Virginia & Pocahontas and Randolph Counties, West Virginia (GeoConcepts Project No. 11002.04) Dear Mr. Olness: GeoConcepts Engineering, Inc. (GeoConcepts) is pleased to present this fracture analysis and existing dye trace report for the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Sincerely, GEOCONCEPTS ENGINEERING, INC. Joshua D. Valentino, PhD Robert K. Denton Jr., CPG, LPSS Senior Staff Geologist Senior Geologist [email protected] [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope of Services ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]