An Interview with Captain John O'donnell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Interview with Captain John O'donnell A Battle That Must Not Be Forgotten: An Interview with Captain John O’Donnell Interviewer: Kyle Rushford Interviewee: John O’Donnell InstruCtor: Alex Haight Date: February 13, 2013 Table of Contents Interviewee Release Form......................................................................................................................3 Interviewer Release Form......................................................................................................................4 Statement of Purpose................................................................................................................................5 Biography.......................................................................................................................................................6 Historical Contextualization: “A Battle That Must Not Be Forgotten”.................................8 Interview Transcription........................................................................................................................23 Audio Time Indexing Log......................................................................................................................45 Interview Analysis...................................................................................................................................46 Appendix I...................................................................................................................................................51 Appendix II.................................................................................................................................................52 Appendix III................................................................................................................................................53 Appendix IV................................................................................................................................................54 Works Consulted......................................................................................................................................55 StateMent of Purpose The purpose of this Oral History interview with Captain John O’Donnell is not just to learn about World War II and the Battle of Leyte Gulf, but also to gain a new perspective on World War II and the Battle of Leyte Gulf. In history textbooks, a reader cannot learn about the personal experiences of the average person who was there to witness and/or participate in event. Mr. John O’Donnell describes his life from childhood to the end of his service. This interview provides an understanding of the life of a child growing up in the Great Depression and life as a naval aviator during World War II. Biography Captain John O’Donnell was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1921. His parents were both Irish immigrants. John’s father worked as a chauffeur for a wealthy Philadelphia family. As a child growing up in the Depression years, John was exposed to both the poor side and the wealthy side of society. He graduated from high school in 1939, the same year that Germany invaded Poland and started World War II. John and his friends knew that the United States would eventually be pulled into World War II. In 1942, John enlisted and decided to join Naval Aviation. After finishing Pre-Flight School, Basic Training, and Advanced Training, John joined a fighter squadron and was deployed to the Pacific Theatre. John O’Donnell participated in multiple bombing raids in the Philippines. He served with distinction in the Battle of Leyte Gulf where he was stationed in Task Unit Taffy 2 under Admiral Felix Stump. He engaged Admiral Kurita’s forces off the coast of the island, Samar. It was through the efforts of Taffy 1, Taffy 2, and Taffy 3 that convinced Admiral Kurita that he was walking into a trap, which led him to retreat. This retreat meant the end of the Battle of Leyte Gulf, and a major victory for the United States. John left the Navy in 1946, but was returned in 1951, served in the Korean War, and left the service for good in 1970. Over the course of his service, he has earned many medals and special awards for his service such as the Distinguished Flying Cross and 7 Air Medals. Overall, John served for a total of twenty-three years in active service without any combat or service-related injuries. Thanks to the GI Bill, he was able to study and graduate from the University of Pennsylvania and earned a Master’s Degree at George Washington University. During his service in the Navy, he married in 1967, and now has two daughters and four grandchildren. John worked for twenty-one years in data processing for HP. He has also written an unpublished book called “Ghost 14” about the fictional story of a real, missing plane that was part of a shipment the Shah of Iran. John O’Donnell now resides in Potomac, Maryland with his wife. A Battle That Must Not Be Forgotten: Leyte Gulf A historian, Norman D. Palmer, once described the Battle of Leyte Gulf as, “the greatest naval battle in history” (Palmer 129). In terms of tonnage of ships and tonnage of ships sunk, the Battle of Leyte Gulf was the largest naval battle in the world. The US Navy faced off against the Imperial Japanese Navy in the Philippines. The Americans were commanded by Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz, Fleet Admiral William “Bull” Halsey, Vice Admiral Thomas Kinkaid, and Vice Admiral Thomas Sprague. The Japanese were commanded by Vice Admiral Takeo Kurita, Vice Admiral Jisaburō Ozawa, and Vice Admiral Shōji Nishimura. President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered troops to land on the island of Leyte to liberate the Philippines. The Navy’s purpose was to provide support for the troop landings in the Philippines. The Americans won a decisive victory over the Japanese forces. The damage unleashed upon the Japanese Imperial Navy, left it incapable of inflicting any serious damage to the US Navy. After the Battle of Leyte Gulf, Japanese supply lines were cut off and this allowed the American forces to free the Philippines, paving the way for an eventual victory. After that battle, the Japanese had no chance of winning the war. Although the battle was a blunder, the overall greatness of the Battle of Leyte Gulf cannot be denied. World War II in Europe began when Germany invaded Poland in September of 1939, but for America, it began when the Japanese launched an attack on a US naval base called Pearl Harbor in Oahu, Hawaii on December 7, 1941. In 1937, Japan attacked China. Two years later, the US placed a trade embargo on Japan, cutting off one of Japan's main suppliers of oil and iron. Japan allied itself with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy to enable them to expand their empire to the Pacific. The Japanese wished to expand their empire to encompass the entire Pacific Ocean, and the only obstacle standing in their way was the US Navy’s Pacific fleet. Pearl Harbor was the headquarters of the US Pacific Fleet. It had a submarine base, oil storage facilities, and seven airfields. If the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, they would cripple the United States Navy and they would be able to seize the Pacific territories before the United States Navy could recover. The Japanese carriers were in position at the night of December 6th. The attack was planned to take place on Sunday morning, when the inhabitants of the base and island would be least prepared. 90% of the damage occurred during the first 10 minutes of the attack. American radar operators noticed the Japanese aircraft, but were informed that it was just their B- 17 bombers that were due in soon. At 7:40, the flight commander fires a flare into the sky to signal his men to commence the attack. The Japanese were poised to strike, and the flight commander was confident that total surprised had been achieved. The Americans then picked up a radio message from the flight commander that said, "Tora, Tora, Tora", which was a signal to the Japanese High Command that total surprise had been achieved. This was sent just before the first bomb was dropped. Then, without warning at 7:55 in the morning, Japanese planes flew overhead and began the attack. The first wave consisted of 189 planes. The second wave consisted of 167 planes. Bombers destroyed vulnerable planes and hangars, fighters strafed the bases with their machine guns, and torpedo planes launched torpedoes against Battleship Row. After the Americans realized they were under massive attack, they tried to launch ships that hadn't been hit yet, tried to get fighters in the air, and returned fire with AA guns. Luckily America's aircraft carriers were away. These would later become important in the war that America has been pulled in. The last of the Japanese aircraft returns at 1:00 in the afternoon. The Japanese only lost 29 out of their 350 attacking planes. The US lost over 2,000 lives that day. Eighteen warships were sunk or damaged and 180 aircraft were destroyed. In one horrific case, the USS Arizona's ammunition was hit by a Japanese high- altitude bomber, and caused a massive explosion, killing over 1,000 sailors and marines in an instant. It’s funny how history tends to repeat itself as the attack on Pearl Harbor has many similarities with the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks sixty years later. The lack of intelligence gathering and processing allowed the Japanese and Al-Qaeda to get within striking distance of their targets. Both enemies used aircraft to damage and destroy their targets. The lack of preparation and the element of surprise added to the horror of the attacks. Soon after
Recommended publications
  • Spring 2021 | 28:1 Volume Thethe Bugle 1
    THE 1 SPRINGBU 2021 | VOLUME 28:1 GLE THE BUGLE 7 | FROM THE DIRECTOR 8 | BEYOND STONE: STORIES BEHIND THE MEMORIAL 11 | SGT. BRIAN P. SCOTT REMEMBERED 12 | EVERY VETERAN IS A STORY 14 | THE ADMIRALS WEPT: BILLY MITCHELL AND THE ATLANTIC BOMBING TESTS OF 1921 18 | DESERT STORM DOC: STEVEN L. ORECK 20 | ORAL HISTORIES: WWII WISCONSIN AVIATORS 22 | MILWAUKEE SOLDIERS HOME RENOVATION 23 | CALENDAR OF EVENTS 24 | FROM THE FOUNDATION 26 | THANK YOU DONORS COVER IMAGE Rodney D. Williams, a Delafield, Wisconsin resident, served in the 17th Aero Squadron during World War I. Williams trained in Canada and Texas before being deployed to Europe, where he flew a Sopwith Camel fighter in combat. In 1918, he downed four planes and one balloon, qualifying as Wisconsin’s first and only World War I combat Ace. While flying his last mission, Williams was wounded, and his gas tank was punctured by bullets. Williams managed to land his plane in an aerodome and was hospitalized for the remainder of the war. After the war, Williams returned to Wisconsin. He died in 1972 and is buried in Salem Cemetery in Delafield. WVM.1070.I031 MUSEUM STAFF THE FOUNDATION DIRECTOR WISCONSIN BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHRISTOPHER L. KOLAKOWSKI 608.266.1009 VETERANS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR PRESIDENT DIRECTORS AT LARGE JENNIFER VAN HAAFTEN 608.261.6802 MUSEUM DAN CHECKI DAN GREENE OPERATIONS ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT WILLIAM F. HUSTAD ELISE MCFARLANE 608.261.0534 30 WEST MIFFLIN STREET JOANE MATHEWS TIMOTHY LA SAGE ORAL HISTORIAN MADISON, WI 53703 TREASURER JOSEPH NAYLOR LUKE SPRAGUE 608.261.0537 ON THE CAPITOL SQUARE DAN HEILIGER PHIL PRANGE 608.267.1799 CURATOR OF HISTORY SECRETARY BOB SIMMONS wisvetsmuseum.com KEVIN HAMPTON 608.261.5409 TOM HUISMANN NATHANIEL T.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Reminiscences of Vice Admiral Truman
    Index to The Reminiscences of Vice Admiral Truman J. Hedding, United States Navy (Retired) Aircraft Carriers Development of tactical doctrine in 1943 for the fast carrier task force, 37-40 See also Carrier Division Three, Task Force 58 Air Force, U.S. Air Force members of the Joint Staff were well organized during the 1949-51 period in terms of the service's party line on various issues, 167-168; some of its responsibilities moved under the Pacific Command when that command became truly joint in the early 1950s, 169-172 Alcohol Cheap whiskey was available at the naval officers' club on Guam in the summer of 1945, 128-129 Ancon, USS (AGC-4) Amphibious command ship that served as a floating hotel in Tokyo for the staff of the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey in late 1945, 131-132; Japanese Navy wartime action reports that had been stored in caves were taken aboard the ship in late 1945 to be microfilmed, 139-140. site of 1945 interview of Prince Konoye, former Japanese Prime Minister, 141-142; returned to the United States at the end of 1945, 152-153 Anderson, Major General Orvil A., USA Army Air Forces officer who made inflated claims concerning the effectiveness of his service's bombing campaigns in World War II, 145; role in interrogating Japanese as part of the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey in 1945, 146-147 Antiair Warfare Effective U.S. antiaircraft fire during a carrier strike against the Marianas Islands in February 1944, 53 Army, U.S. Some of its responsibilities moved under the Pacific Command when that command became truly joint in the early 1950s, 169-172 Army Air Forces, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Historic Information the Doolittle Raid (Hornet CV-8) Compiled and Written by Museum Historian Bob Fish
    USS Hornet Sea, Air & Space Museum Additional Historic Information The Doolittle Raid (Hornet CV-8) Compiled and Written by Museum Historian Bob Fish AMERICA STRIKES BACK The Doolittle Raid of April 18, 1942 was the first U.S. air raid to strike the Japanese home islands during WWII. The mission is notable in that it was the only operation in which U.S. Army Air Forces bombers were launched from an aircraft carrier into combat. The raid demonstrated how vulnerable the Japanese home islands were to air attack just four months after their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. While the damage inflicted was slight, the raid significantly boosted American morale while setting in motion a chain of Japanese military events that were disastrous for their long-term war effort. Planning & Preparation Immediately after the Pearl Harbor attack, President Roosevelt tasked senior U.S. military commanders with finding a suitable response to assuage the public outrage. Unfortunately, it turned out to be a difficult assignment. The Army Air Forces had no bases in Asia close enough to allow their bombers to attack Japan. At the same time, the Navy had no airplanes with the range and munitions capacity to do meaningful damage without risking the few ships left in the Pacific Fleet. In early January of 1942, Captain Francis Low1, a submariner on CNO Admiral Ernest King’s staff, visited Norfolk, VA to review the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, USS Hornet CV-8. During this visit, he realized that Army medium-range bombers might be successfully launched from an aircraft carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Shoot and How Adm
    US Navy photo By John T. Correll Battle of the Philippine Sea, Leyte Gulf. It was also overshadowed 1944, the Japanese had scaled back their June 19-20, 1944, marked the by the other war news that month from plans but still hoped to hold a shorter end of Japanese naval airpower halfway around the world: The Allied inner perimeter, anchored on the east by as a signifi cant factor in World War II. landings in Normandy on D-Day, June 6, the Mariana Islands. It was the single biggest aircraft carrier to begin the invasion of occupied Europe. Japan’s greatest hero, Adm. Isoroku battle in history. However, naval history buffs still argue Yamamoto, who had planned the Pearl The fi rst day is remembered as “the about the Turkey Shoot and how Adm. Harbor attack, was dead, his airplane shot Great Marianas Turkey Shoot,” in which Raymond A. Spruance—the non-aviator down over the jungles of New Guinea in US Navy pilots and anti-aircraft gun- in command of the US Fifth Fleet—might 1943 by AAF P-38s. There was no one ners shot down more than 300 Japanese have conducted the battle, but didn’t. of comparable stature to take his place. airplanes. Before the two-day battle was Meanwhile, the US armed forces were over, the Japanese had lost fi ve ships, REVERSAL OF FORTUNES engaged in an intramural argument about including three fl eet carriers, and a total The heyday of the Japanese navy in the strategy. Gen. Douglas MacArthur called of 476 airplanes and 450 aviators.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-05 Aerograph.Pdf
    1 1 2 PROGRAM 32ND Annual Naval Weather Service Association Reunion June 2006 Pittsburgh, PA COME SEE THE SMOKELESS CITY Wednesday, 14 June 1200-1800 Hospitality Center opens 1200-1800 Reunion Registration 1400-1600 First annual Executive Board Meeting 1800-2000 Welcome Aboard Party (No Host) 2000-2300 Hospitality Center opens & Reunion registration Thursday, 15 June 0700-0900 Hospitality Center opens & Reunion registration 0900-1200 NWSA Membership Meeting #1 1200-2300 Hospitality Center opens 1300-1400 Audit Committee meets in Sec-Treas Jim Stone's room 1400-1600 Ice Cream Social in Hospitality Center (Banana Split) The remainder of afternoon and evening is open for personal use. Friday, 16 June 0700-1530 Hospitality Center opens & Reunion registration 0700-1200 Golf Tourney 1700-Buses shove off for Evening Moonlight Dinner Dance Cruise – Gateway Clipper Fleet 2300- (Roughly) Buses return form Moonlight Dinner Cruise Saturday, 17 June 0700-0855 Hospitality Center opens & Reunion registration 0900-1000 Commander, Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command annual informational seminar 1015-1200 NWSA Membership Meeting #2 1200-1600 Hospitality Center opens & Reunion Registration 1300-1400 Second Annual Executive Board meeting 1800-1900 No Host Cocktail 1900-2300 Reunion Banquet Sunday, 18 June 0700-1100 Hospitality Center Open (1100 – You don’t have to Go Home but you can’t stay here) HAVE A SAFE TRIP HOME ENJOYED 2 3 (228) 688-4187 [email protected] EDITOR’S DESK AGCM Pat O’Brien, USN RET CHARLES R. JORDAN USN RET, 3464 (850) 968-0552 [email protected] Chimney Rock, Abilene, TX 79606- (325) Nominating: AGCM Moon Mullen, USN RET 692-7642.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Leadership and Organizational Innovation: a Case Study of the Pacific Theater in Ww Ii
    DISSERTATION APPROVED BY June 16, 2020 James R. Martin Jr. Date James R. Martin, Jr., Ph.D., Chair Elizabeth Elliot-Meisel, Ph.D., Committee Member Jennifer Moss Breen, Ph.D., Director _______________________________________ Gail M. Jensen, Ph.D., Dean MILITARY LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE PACIFIC THEATER IN WW II ___________________________________ By Anthony C. Zinni ___________________________________ A DISSERTATION IN PRACTICE Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of Creighton University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Interdisciplinary Leadership _________________________________ Omaha, NE (May 15, 2020) Copyright (2020), Anthony C. Zinni This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. iii Abstract The US military, faced with unprecedented challenges, has sought to transform its services and other commands into more innovative organizations and has struggled in trying to understand the process to accomplish this. Studies that have been conducted to determine how best to make this transformation have not offered a comprehensive methodology or model that has proven useful. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the practices of military leadership teams and organizational innovation in historic and highly successful military commands, specifically in the World War II Pacific theater of operations, to gain insights into how current and future leadership may influence innovation. The research examined historical documents, leader accounts, and scholarly literature on innovation. Through this case study, insights were gained into how current and future leadership may influence the transformation into innovative organizations through their practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay the Battle of Midway John Francis
    Review Essay The Battle of Midway John Francis “There has been much written about the Battle of Midway and in many respects there has been a startling lack of accuracy.”(1) This comment dates from 1946 prior to the immediate post-Second World War investigations into various aspects of the Pacific War and the official histories produced in the late 1940s and early 1950s. It was an accurate appreciation made, not by one of the investigators or historians, but by a participant, Stanhope Ring, commander of one of the USN’s three carrier air groups in the battle. Ring was also prescient. Much has since been written on Midway, but accurate accounts are still difficult to find. Early published works were brief, based on uncorroborated, often conflicting recollections and built on the story of American triumph “against the odds” that had been reported in the news at the time. The requirements of military security limited the release of information, and this was particularly true concerning the extent of code-breaking work by the USN’s radio intercept units, especially station “Hypo” at Pearl Harbor. Even after the war, it took a long time for details of the intelligence story to be revealed and later studies have shown that the initial published versions lacked much in accuracy. It is clear that these early accounts were heavily influenced by some of the central characters on both sides who, by then, had risen to high rank and in some cases had an opportunity to shape the official record. Japanese accounts were also influenced by a desire to remain on friendly terms with the victors of the conflict, who by then were the occupying power in the Japanese homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2017 Newsletter
    Freedom’s Voice The Monthly Newsletter of the Military History Center 112 N. Main ST Broken Arrow, OK 74012 http://www.okmhc.org/ “Promoting Patriotism through the Preservation of Military History” Volume 5, Number 4 April 2017 World War I – April 6, 1917 World War I began in Europe in 1914, with the German invasion of Luxembourg on August 2 and Belgium on August The History Classic 3. By 1917, the opposing armies on the Western Front had been brutally killing each other for almost three years, yet the Golf Tournament battle lines had barely moved. On the Eastern Front, the Germans had much greater success against the Russians, who Benefitting by the beginning of 1917 were on the verge of collapse. Alto- gether, billions had been spent, and millions were dead. Military President Woodrow Wilson and the American people wanted no part of Europe’s war, even in the face of German History Center provocation. German restoration of unrestricted submarine warfare in early 1917, and the British interception of the in- and famous Zimmermann telegram made Wilson’s position of neutrality untenable. The Zimmermann telegram was a mes- sage from the German foreign office to the German ambas- sador in Mexico City, foolishly offering Mexico the restoration of Texas and the American Southwest if it would enter the Battle Creek Golf Club war on the side of Germany. This inflamed the American people, and President Wilson had no choice but to ask Con- Friday, May 5 gress for a declaration of war on Germany, which he did on April 2, 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quiet Warrior Back in Newport—Admiral Spruance, the Return To
    Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 8 Number 2 Spring 2011 The Quiet aW rrior Back in Newport—Admiral Spruance, the Return to the Naval War College, and the Lessons of the Pacific aW r, 1946–1947 Hal M. Friedman Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Friedman, Hal M. (2011) "The Quiet Warrior Back in Newport—Admiral Spruance, the Return to the Naval War College, and the Lessons of the Pacific aW r, 1946–1947," Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Friedman: The Quiet Warrior Back in Newport—Admiral Spruance, the Return to THE QUIET WARRIOR BACK IN NEWPORT Admiral Spruance, the Return to the Naval War College, and the Lessons of the Pacific War, 1946–1947 Hal M. Friedman ar is about wreckage. Consequently, postwar periods tend to be about re- Wconstruction, and that phenomenon is what this article is about. It sets the scene for a larger exploration (the subject of projected sequels to the recent book from which this article is adapted) of how a military-academic institution —the Naval War College, in Newport, Rhode Island—attempted to readjust to a Hal M.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions Above Words: a Biography of Vice Admiral Clifton “Ziggy” Sprague
    Bellarmine University ScholarWorks@Bellarmine Undergraduate Theses Undergraduate Works 4-23-2021 Actions Above Words: A Biography of Vice Admiral Clifton “Ziggy” Sprague John Kirwan Bellarmine University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/ugrad_theses Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Kirwan, John, "Actions Above Words: A Biography of Vice Admiral Clifton “Ziggy” Sprague" (2021). Undergraduate Theses. 65. https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/ugrad_theses/65 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Works at ScholarWorks@Bellarmine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@Bellarmine. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1 Actions Above Words: A Biography of Vice Admiral Clifton “Ziggy” Sprague John Kirwan Honors – 451 Thesis April 23, 2021 2 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Literature Review 4 Section 1: Early Life 7 Section 2: The Naval Academy and the First World War 10 Section 3: The Interwar and Aviation 15 Section 4: The Second World War 21 Section 5: The Battle Off Samar 27 Section 6: The End of the War and Post-War Life 31 Section 7: The Contribution of this Thesis 34 Bibliography 36 3 Introduction: Vice Admiral Clifton A.F. “Ziggy” Sprague. A name unfamiliar to many and yet celebrated by those that know it. A name which while just as decorated as his peers has been largely forgotten by the public eye. When considering those leaders who captured popular sentiment and held onto it, individuals like General George Patton, Supreme Commander and later President Dwight D.
    [Show full text]
  • William Gutter, Rutgers College 1942
    RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY NEW BRUNSWICK AN INTERVIEW WITH WILLIAM F. GUTTER FOR THE RUTGERS ORAL HISTORY ARCHIVES OF WORLD WAR II INTERVIEW BY KURT PIEHLER and ELAINE BARRETT GREAT NECK, NEW YORK NOVEMBER 16, 1995 TRANSCRIPT BY KAREN AUERBACH Kurt Piehler: This begins an interview with Mr. William F. Gutter on November 16, 1995 at Great Neck, New York with Kurt Piehler and … Elaine Barrett: Elaine Barrett KP: I guess I would begin by asking you to talk a little bit about your parents and growing up in New York, in Jamaica. William Gutter: Well, I was born and raised in Jamaica, Queens. It was quite different, later on, and still is, I guess, but that’s where my roots were. My parents’ roots were there, too. They go back many years. 1911, I think, they were married. And they moved to Jamaica shortly after, and I was born there in 1922 and went to Jamaica High and then wanted to go to college in New Brunswick. I wanted to go to Rutgers. And I was having a tough time because, being out of state, they were giving priority strictly to the [Jersey people]. But I had a couple of good friends and was able to speak to Harold Hoffman, who had just finished as governor over there in Jersey, and there was a furniture dealer in Perth Amboy, (Albert Leon?), who was, for a long time, known there, and they put in a good word for me. But came time, I was already enrolled at, matriculated in Hofstra, and that was new at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies of Operational, Strategic, and Diplomatic Naval Leadership During the 20Th and Early 21St Centuries
    Case Studies of Operational, Strategic, and Diplomatic Naval Leadership during the 20th and Early 21st Centuries Edited by John B. Hattendorf and Bruce A. Elleman d25395_DSGraphics_NineteenGunSalute-cvr.indd 1 10/15/2009 1:47:13 AM U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE Use of ISBN Prefix This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its authenticity. ISBN 978-1-884733-66-6 is for this U.S. Government Printing Office Official Edition only. The Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any re- printed edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The logo of the U.S. Naval War College (NWC), Newport, Rhode Island, authenticates Nineteen-Gun Salute: Case Studies of Operational, Strategic, and Diplomatic Naval Leadership during the 20th and Early 21st Centuries, edited by John B. Hattendorf and Bruce A. Elleman, as an official publication of the College. It is prohibited to use NWC’s logo on any republication of this book without the express, written permission of the Editor, Naval War College Press or the editor’s designee. Table of Contents Acknowledgements . iv List of Maps and Illustrations . v Introduction: John B . Hattendorf . vi 1. Radical, But Right — William Sowden Sims (1858–1936), by Branden Little and Kenneth J. Hagan. 1 2. Efficiency — William Harrison Standley (1872–1963), by Craig C. Felker. 13 3. Sound Judgment — William Daniel Leahy (1875–1959), by Robert James Maddox . 25 4.
    [Show full text]