DOCSLIB.ORG

Turkey Shoot and How Adm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turkey Shoot and How Adm US Navy photo By John T. Correll Battle of the Philippine Sea, Leyte Gulf. It was also overshadowed 1944, the Japanese had scaled back their June 19-20, 1944, marked the by the other war news that month from plans but still hoped to hold a shorter end of Japanese naval airpower halfway around the world: The Allied inner perimeter, anchored on the east by as a signifi cant factor in World War II. landings in Normandy on D-Day, June 6, the Mariana Islands. It was the single biggest aircraft carrier to begin the invasion of occupied Europe. Japan’s greatest hero, Adm. Isoroku battle in history. However, naval history buffs still argue Yamamoto, who had planned the Pearl The fi rst day is remembered as “the about the Turkey Shoot and how Adm. Harbor attack, was dead, his airplane shot Great Marianas Turkey Shoot,” in which Raymond A. Spruance—the non-aviator down over the jungles of New Guinea in US Navy pilots and anti-aircraft gun- in command of the US Fifth Fleet—might 1943 by AAF P-38s. There was no one ners shot down more than 300 Japanese have conducted the battle, but didn’t. of comparable stature to take his place. airplanes. Before the two-day battle was Meanwhile, the US armed forces were over, the Japanese had lost fi ve ships, REVERSAL OF FORTUNES engaged in an intramural argument about including three fl eet carriers, and a total The heyday of the Japanese navy in the strategy. Gen. Douglas MacArthur called of 476 airplanes and 450 aviators. Pacifi c did not last long. At Midway in for a push northward from New Guinea The Japanese fl ed with the ships and June 1942, fi ve months after the attack on through the Philippines led, of course, aircraft they had left. The carriers would Pearl Harbor, the Imperial Fleet lost four by MacArthur. Adm. Ernest J. King, not again be an effective force in the war carriers, one cruiser, and 322 airplanes Chief of Naval Operations, advocated except as decoys to distract the oncoming on the same day. an island-hopping approach across the Americans. Expecting fast conquest, Japan did not central Pacific where Adm. Chester W. The battle was part of Operation provide for replacing losses in aircraft and Nimitz was in command. Forager, the amphibious invasion of the trained aircrews. Japanese technology did King had an unusual ally in Gen. Marianas. Under the cover of air supe- not keep pace and the once-superior A6M Henry H. “Hap” Arnold, commander riority from US carriers, ground forces Zero fi ghter was soon outclassed by the of the Army Air Forces. Arnold, who took Saipan, Guam, and Tinian, 1,500 US Navy F6F Hellcat and the Army Air rarely agreed with King on strategy, miles from Tokyo and the Kanto Plain Forces P-38 Lightning. wanted bases in the Marianas from which and within range for B-29 bombers. The outer defensive perimeter—run- his new B-29 bombers could strike the For whatever reason, the Marianas ning through the Gilbert Islands in the Japanese home islands. Turkey Shoot never achieved the popular central Pacifi c around to New Guinea The Joint Chiefs of Staff came down fame of the carrier battles at Midway and and Sumatra—was no longer secure. By squarely on both sides of the issue, direct- 52 AIR FORCE Magazine / April 2016 It was the biggest carrier battle of all time. It also gained bases from which B-29s could strike Japan. ing an invasion of the Marianas in June The force created to stop the Ameri- advantages. His airplanes—lacking ar- 1944 with invasion of the Philippines to cans was the Mobile Fleet, to which mor and self-sealing fuel tanks—were follow a few months later. virtually all of Japan’s remaining car- lighter and had greater range. He could Operation Forager, drawn up by King, riers, battleships, and cruisers were attack from 100 miles farther away than would strike at three islands in the Mari- assigned. The commander was Vice the Americans could. The Americans anas chain: Saipan, Tinian, and Guam. Adm. Jisaburo Ozawa. would be far from support bases; Ozawa Vice Adm. Chuichi Nagumo, who Ozawa pulled the Mobile Fleet together would have bases nearby. commanded the strike on Pearl Harbor, at Tawi Tawi in the southern Philippines. The American carriers, steaming west had been relegated to relatively minor All told, he had nine carriers with 450 from their anchorage at Majuro Atoll positions since the defeat of his carriers combat aircraft, fi ve battleships, 13 cruis- in the Marshall Islands, would have at Midway. In 1944, he was commander ers, and 28 destroyers. It was a large force, the easterly tradewinds at their backs. of the Central Pacific Area Fleet on but as Ozawa knew, badly outnumbered To launch or recover aircraft, they had Saipan, which was not as impressive by the US Fifth Fleet. to swing around into the wind, turning as the name suggested. It consisted of In addition to the airplanes on his away from the enemy. Ozawa, facing patrol craft, coastal vessels, and some carriers, Ozawa could call upon hun- into the wind, could launch and recover ground forces. dreds of land-based aircraft dispersed while moving forward. Ironically, the first target of the Op- to islands around the perimeter from On the other hand, Ozawa’s Zero eration Forager attack would be Saipan. Guam to New Guinea to assist. fighters were no match for the US The plan was to lure the Fifth Fleet Hellcats. His pilots were minimally JAPAN’S DESPERATE PLAN into open water west of the Marianas trained and had little flying experience. The main Japanese naval strategy in where the land-based airplanes would His meager fuel supply did not allow World War II was the “Decisive Battle,” destroy a third of the US ships before expansive operations. inspired by Adm. Heihachiro Togo’s vic- the opposing carrier forces engaged. On June 15, Adm. Soemu Toyoda, tory over the Russian fleet at Tsushima Mobile Fleet aircraft would finish off commander in chief of the Imperial Strait in 1905 in the Russo-Japanese War. the rest Fleet, sent a message to the Mobile In 1944, the Imperial Navy was des- Offsetting to some extent his shortage Fleet: “The rise and fall of Imperial perately seeking such an engagement, in numbers, Ozawa had several tactical Japan depends on this one battle,” he upon which the outcome of the war might turn. Fighter contrails paint the sky during the Marianas Turkey Shoot in 1944. AIR FORCE Magazine / April 2016 53 Halsey- Ozawa Oct. 25 Mariana Luzon Islands Lee Eric map by Staff Saipan Philippine Tinian Islands Rota Philippine Guam Sea Japan Task Mobile Force 58 Fleet Leyte Turkey Shoot June 19 Mindanao Palau Majuro Atoll Islands Tawi Tawi US Navy photos Navy US said—the same words used by Togo foremost ships of the navy. Some senior was so large it took almost five hours at Tsushima. offi cers, notably King and Adm. William F. to clear the lagoon as it departed from Halsey Jr., had qualifi ed as naval aviators Majuro. It included battleships, cruisers, BLACK SHOE ADMIRAL in midcareer. Others, notably Nimitz and and destroyers, but the heart of the task In command of Operation Forager Spruance, did not. force was seven fleet carriers and eight would be Spruance, regarded by CNO With a big carrier battle looming, many light carriers with 904 combat aircraft. King as “the most intelligent offi cer in of the “brown shoes”—so called because Mitscher’s pilots were mostly expe- the Navy.” Spruance had the complete naval aviators wore brown shoes with their rienced veterans. His principal aircraft trust of Nimitz as well. working uniforms—would have preferred were fast F6F Hellcat fi ghters, SB2C Although the main strength of his com- one of their own in command instead of Helldiver dive bombers, and TBF/TBM mand was a carrier task force, Spruance the “black shoe” Spruance. Avenger torpedo airplanes. Among the was not an aviator. He had been a cruiser The Fifth Fleet had been built up to complement of the carriers were two future offi cer for most of his career before com- extraordinary strength and consisted of US Presidents. Lt. Gerald R. Ford was ing to special prominence as leader of the more than 800 ships grouped into two assistant navigator on Monterey. Ensign carrier victory at Midway and—despite task forces. George H. W. Bush was an Avenger pilot the grumbling of some airmen—was now The striking arm was Task Force on San Jacinto. commander of the US Fifth Fleet. 58, commanded by Rear Adm. Marc Task Force 51 under Vice Adm. Rich- Between the world wars, battleships A. Mitscher, a longtime aviator deeply mond K. Turner brought the 127,000 had been displaced by carriers as the experienced in carrier operations. TF 58 amphibious assault troops who would 54 AIR FORCE Magazine / April 2016 US Navy photo Navy US conduct the invasion. In addition to the Mitscher’s scouts discovered the loca- chew up incoming airplanes with anti- transports and landing craft, Turner tion of the Mobile Fleet in the Philippine aircraft fi re. The US carriers were fanned had combat vessels, including battle- Sea, some 400 miles from the Marianas. out in a wide semicircle about 100 miles ships, but they were of the older and Mitscher proposed to Spruance that TF from Guam and Saipan. slower kind. 58 pull away and go after the enemy car- riers but Spruance would not approve it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Index to the Reminiscences of Vice Admiral Truman
    Index to The Reminiscences of Vice Admiral Truman J. Hedding, United States Navy (Retired) Aircraft Carriers Development of tactical doctrine in 1943 for the fast carrier task force, 37-40 See also Carrier Division Three, Task Force 58 Air Force, U.S. Air Force members of the Joint Staff were well organized during the 1949-51 period in terms of the service's party line on various issues, 167-168; some of its responsibilities moved under the Pacific Command when that command became truly joint in the early 1950s, 169-172 Alcohol Cheap whiskey was available at the naval officers' club on Guam in the summer of 1945, 128-129 Ancon, USS (AGC-4) Amphibious command ship that served as a floating hotel in Tokyo for the staff of the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey in late 1945, 131-132; Japanese Navy wartime action reports that had been stored in caves were taken aboard the ship in late 1945 to be microfilmed, 139-140. site of 1945 interview of Prince Konoye, former Japanese Prime Minister, 141-142; returned to the United States at the end of 1945, 152-153 Anderson, Major General Orvil A., USA Army Air Forces officer who made inflated claims concerning the effectiveness of his service's bombing campaigns in World War II, 145; role in interrogating Japanese as part of the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey in 1945, 146-147 Antiair Warfare Effective U.S. antiaircraft fire during a carrier strike against the Marianas Islands in February 1944, 53 Army, U.S. Some of its responsibilities moved under the Pacific Command when that command became truly joint in the early 1950s, 169-172 Army Air Forces, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Historic Information the Doolittle Raid (Hornet CV-8) Compiled and Written by Museum Historian Bob Fish
    USS Hornet Sea, Air & Space Museum Additional Historic Information The Doolittle Raid (Hornet CV-8) Compiled and Written by Museum Historian Bob Fish AMERICA STRIKES BACK The Doolittle Raid of April 18, 1942 was the first U.S. air raid to strike the Japanese home islands during WWII. The mission is notable in that it was the only operation in which U.S. Army Air Forces bombers were launched from an aircraft carrier into combat. The raid demonstrated how vulnerable the Japanese home islands were to air attack just four months after their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. While the damage inflicted was slight, the raid significantly boosted American morale while setting in motion a chain of Japanese military events that were disastrous for their long-term war effort. Planning & Preparation Immediately after the Pearl Harbor attack, President Roosevelt tasked senior U.S. military commanders with finding a suitable response to assuage the public outrage. Unfortunately, it turned out to be a difficult assignment. The Army Air Forces had no bases in Asia close enough to allow their bombers to attack Japan. At the same time, the Navy had no airplanes with the range and munitions capacity to do meaningful damage without risking the few ships left in the Pacific Fleet. In early January of 1942, Captain Francis Low1, a submariner on CNO Admiral Ernest King’s staff, visited Norfolk, VA to review the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, USS Hornet CV-8. During this visit, he realized that Army medium-range bombers might be successfully launched from an aircraft carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • American Aces Against the Kamikaze
    OSPREY AIRCRAFT OF THE ACES® • 109 American Aces Against the Kamikaze Edward M Young © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com OSPREY AIRCRAFT OF THE ACES • 109 American Aces Against the Kamikaze © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE THE BEGINNING 6 CHAPTER TWO OKINAWA – PRELUDE TO INVASION 31 CHAPTER THREE THE APRIL BATTLES 44 CHAPTER FOUR THE FINAL BATTLES 66 CHAPTER FIVE NIGHTFIGHTERS AND NEAR ACES 83 APPENDICES 90 COLOUR PLATES COMMENTARY 91 INDEX 95 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com THE BEGINNING CHAPTER ONE t 0729 hrs on the morning of 25 October 1944, radar on the escort carriers of Task Force 77.4.1 (call sign ‘Taffy 1’), cruising Aoff the Philippine island of Mindanao, picked up Japanese aeroplanes approaching through the scattered cumulous clouds. The carriers immediately went to General Quarters on what had already been an eventful morning. Using the clouds as cover, the Japanese aircraft managed to reach a point above ‘Taffy 1’ without being seen. Suddenly, at 0740 hrs, an A6M5 Reisen dived out of the clouds directly into the escort carrier USS Santee (CVE-29), crashing through its flightdeck on the port side forward of the elevator. Just 30 seconds later a second ‘Zeke’ dived towards the USS Suwannee (CVE-27), while a third targeted USS Petrof Bay (CVE-80) – anti-aircraft artillery (AAA) fire managed to shoot down both fighters. Then, at 0804 hrs, a fourth ‘Zeke’ dived on the Petrof Bay, but when hit by AAA it swerved and crashed into the flightdeck of Suwanee, blowing a hole in it forward of the aft elevator.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Line the Official Publication of the CAF Southern California Wing 455 Aviation Drive, Camarillo, CA 93010 (805) 482-0064
    Flight Line The Official Publication of the CAF Southern California Wing 455 Aviation Drive, Camarillo, CA 93010 (805) 482-0064 June, 2015 Vol. XXXIV No. 6 © Photo by Frank Mormillo See Page 19 for story of air terminal named for Capt. David McCampbell – Navy pilot of Minsi III Visit us online at www.cafsocal.com © Photo Courtesy of Dan Newcomb Here’s Col. Dan Newcomb in one of his favorite seats – the rear seat in Marc Russell’s T-34. Dan wears several hats in our Wing. Other than his helmet, he is a long-time member of the PBJ Restoration Team; is the official historian of our PBJ-1J “Semper Fi;” is a “Flight Line” author and photographer; and currently has taken on the job of Cadet Program Manager. See his stories on pages 12 and 17. Thanks for all you do, Dan! Wing Staff Meeting, Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. at the CAF Museum Hangar, 455 Aviation Drive, Camarillo Airport THE CAF IS A PATRIOTIC ORGANIZATION DEDICATED TO THE PRESERVATION OF THE WORLD’S GREATEST COMBAT AIRCRAFT. June 2015 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 Museum Closed Work Day Work Day Work Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Museum Closed Work Day Work Day Work Day 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Museum Closed Work Day Work Day Docent Wing Staff Meeting 3:30 Meeting 9:30 Work Day 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Longest Day Museum Closed Work Day Work Day Work Day of the Year 28 29 30 Museum Open Museum Closed Work Day 10am to 4pm Every Day Memorial Day Except Monday and major holidays STAFF AND APPOINTED POSITIONS IN THIS ISSUE Wing Leader * Ron Missildine (805) 404-1837 [email protected] Wing Calendar .
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Asian History
    3 ASIAN HISTORY Porter & Porter and the American Occupation II War World on Reflections Japanese Edgar A. Porter and Ran Ying Porter Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Asian History The aim of the series is to offer a forum for writers of monographs and occasionally anthologies on Asian history. The Asian History series focuses on cultural and historical studies of politics and intellectual ideas and crosscuts the disciplines of history, political science, sociology and cultural studies. Series Editor Hans Hägerdal, Linnaeus University, Sweden Editorial Board Members Roger Greatrex, Lund University Angela Schottenhammer, University of Salzburg Deborah Sutton, Lancaster University David Henley, Leiden University Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Edgar A. Porter and Ran Ying Porter Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: 1938 Propaganda poster “Good Friends in Three Countries” celebrating the Anti-Comintern Pact Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 259 8 e-isbn 978 90 4853 263 6 doi 10.5117/9789462982598 nur 692 © Edgar A. Porter & Ran Ying Porter / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2017 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside This Issue
    — 1 — Staunton Military Academy Newsletter Published quarterly by the Staunton Military Academy Foundation • Staunton, Virginia Second Quarter — June 2002 Classes of ‘27, ‘32, ‘37, ‘42, ‘47, ‘52, ‘57, ‘62, ‘67 and ‘72 to be honored: WHERE? Holiday Inn Golf and Reunion set for July 26-28 Conference Center Staunton, Virginia (540) 248-6020 at Holiday Inn, Staunton Reservations: 1-800-932-9061 Fellow SMA Alumni – it’s less The reunion banquet will be held Be sure to ask for the special than 60 days from Reunion on Saturday, and the food, even if half SMA Reunion Weekend Rate 2002! The Honor Classes for this year as good as last year, will be worth it. E-mail: [email protected] are all the graduating classes that end A block of 60 rooms has been reserved with either a “2” or a “7”. That’s by the SMAAA on a first-come/- SCHEDULE: right, everyone from 1927 first-served basis at our reunion through 1972 should get those hotel headquarters, the Friday, July 26 9:00 a.m. Board Meeting fingers dialing or use the in- Holiday Inn Golf and ternet to find your roommate, 2:00 p.m. to Registration and Conference Center in Staun- 6:00 p.m. Refreshments classmate or good friend from ton, VA (located at Route 275W, SMA and make your way to 8:00 p.m. Cash Bar and Exit 225 off I-81). Reservations BBQ Cookout Staunton for a part of the July 26-28 must be made by 19 July to receive Saturday, July 27 reunion weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • Up from Kitty Hawk Chronology
    airforcemag.com Up From Kitty Hawk Chronology AIR FORCE Magazine's Aerospace Chronology Up From Kitty Hawk PART ONE PART TWO 1903-1979 1980-present 1 airforcemag.com Up From Kitty Hawk Chronology Up From Kitty Hawk 1903-1919 Wright brothers at Kill Devil Hill, N.C., 1903. Articles noted throughout the chronology provide additional historical information. They are hyperlinked to Air Force Magazine's online archive. 1903 March 23, 1903. First Wright brothers’ airplane patent, based on their 1902 glider, is filed in America. Aug. 8, 1903. The Langley gasoline engine model airplane is successfully launched from a catapult on a houseboat. Dec. 8, 1903. Second and last trial of the Langley airplane, piloted by Charles M. Manly, is wrecked in launching from a houseboat on the Potomac River in Washington, D.C. Dec. 17, 1903. At Kill Devil Hill near Kitty Hawk, N.C., Orville Wright flies for about 12 seconds over a distance of 120 feet, achieving the world’s first manned, powered, sustained, and controlled flight in a heavier-than-air machine. The Wright brothers made four flights that day. On the last, Wilbur Wright flew for 59 seconds over a distance of 852 feet. (Three days earlier, Wilbur Wright had attempted the first powered flight, managing to cover 105 feet in 3.5 seconds, but he could not sustain or control the flight and crashed.) Dawn at Kill Devil Jewel of the Air 1905 Jan. 18, 1905. The Wright brothers open negotiations with the US government to build an airplane for the Army, but nothing comes of this first meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • ACE BIRTHDAYS JOIN the FRIENDS of the AMERICAN FIGHTER ACES MAY - JULY (Auxiliary of the American Fighter Aces Association)
    American Fighter Aces and Friends The Bulletin of the American Fighter Aces Association April 2018 | Volume 35, No 2 Dick Fleischer: Thunderbolt Over New Guinea Association President's Message Dear Aces, Friends, Survivors, and Honorees: Our Ace's Association was founded in 1960, recognizing the 1450 combat pilots that qualified as Aces for action in World War I, WW II. Korea and Vietnam. In individual combat they contributed to the security of our country in times of war. Since that day, membership in the Association has continued to inspire patriotism and set a high example for our youth in America. Our mission each year is to remind our public of the commitment the pilots had, to remain confident and courageous. It seemed to always be one on one or against the odds, playing the hand they were dealt. Betting it all. The Association's commitment transcends time and continues to be the direction we want to go. I have a large number of helpers in getting the Association's day's work done and I owe many a "Thank You" for their efforts. The Board of Directors officers give continually of their time on com- mittees and are joined by Friends and volunteers to participate in study groups. In order to continue our mission of the future as an educational organization a few changes will have to be made and will require help of some strong donors to get good results. I encourage our Friends of the AFAA to help us in advice, suggestions and recruited a larger membership for support.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending the Pacific War: the New History
    CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE Ending the Pacific War: The New History RICHARD B. FRANK In 1945, and for approximately two decades thereafter, no significant American controversy attended the use of atomic weapons to end the Pacific War. A national consensus assembled around three basic premises: (a) the use of the weapons was justified; (b) the weapons ended the war; and (c) that in at least a rough utilitarian sense, employment of the weapons was morally justified as saving more lives than they cost (Walker 1990 , 2005 ; Bernstein 1995 ). The historian Michael Sherry branded this as “The Patriotic Orthodoxy” (Sherry 1996 ). Beginning in the mid-1960s challenges appeared to “The Patriotic Orthodoxy.” The pejorative label “revisionists” was sometimes pelted at these challengers, but a more accurate term is just critics. The critics developed a canon of tenets that, in their purest incarnation, likewise formed a trio: (a) Japan’ s strategic situation in the summer of 1945 was catastrophically hopeless; (b) Japan ’ s leaders recognized their hopeless situation and were seeking to surrender; and (c) American leaders, thanks to the breaking of Japanese diplomatic codes, knew Japan hovered on the verge of surrender when they unleashed needless nuclear devastation. The critics mustered a number of reasons for the unwarranted use of atomic weapons, but the most provocative by far marches under the banner “atomic diplomacy”: the real target of the weapons was not Japan, but the Soviet Union (Walker 1990 , 2005 ; Bernstein 1995 ). These two rival narratives clashed along a cultural fault line most spectacularly in the “Enola Gay” controversy in 1995 over the proposed text of a Smithsonian Institution exhibit of the fuselage of the plane that dropped the first atomic bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrett Tillman
    IN AThe killsDAY and claims ACE of the top shooters BY BARRETT TILLMAN n the morning of April 7, 1943, American Great War air warriors fi ghter pilots on Guadalcanal in the Solomon Probably the fi rst ace in a day was Austro-Hungarian Stabsfeld- Islands responded to a red alert. More than webel Julius Arigi. On August 22, 1916, with his gunner 100 Japanese aircraft were inbound, sending Feldwebel Johann Lassi, he intercepted Italian aircraft over Wildcats and P-40s scrambling to inter- Albania’s Adriatic coast. The Austrians cept. In a prolonged combat, the de- downed fi ve Farman two-seaters, fenders claimed 39 victories and actu- destroyed or abandoned on the ally got 29—a better than normal ratio water. However, a single-seater of actual kills versus claims. The belle pilot contributed to two of the Oof the brawl was 1st Lt. James E. Swett, a 22-year-old victories. Arigi ended the war as Marine entering his fi rst combat. Fifteen minutes later, Austria’s second-ranking ace with he was fi shed out of the bay, having ditched his shot-up 32 victories. F4F-4 perforated by Japanese and American gunfi re. Almost certainly, the fi rst pilot downing fi ve opponents unaided in one day occurred during April 1917. Though wearing glasses, Leutnant Fritz Otto Bernert became a fi ghter pilot. During “Bloody April” he was on a roll, accounting for 15 of Jasta Boelcke’s 21 victories. On the 24th, the day after receiving the Pour le Merite, he led an Alba- tros patrol.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Leadership and Organizational Innovation: a Case Study of the Pacific Theater in Ww Ii
    DISSERTATION APPROVED BY June 16, 2020 James R. Martin Jr. Date James R. Martin, Jr., Ph.D., Chair Elizabeth Elliot-Meisel, Ph.D., Committee Member Jennifer Moss Breen, Ph.D., Director _______________________________________ Gail M. Jensen, Ph.D., Dean MILITARY LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE PACIFIC THEATER IN WW II ___________________________________ By Anthony C. Zinni ___________________________________ A DISSERTATION IN PRACTICE Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of Creighton University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Interdisciplinary Leadership _________________________________ Omaha, NE (May 15, 2020) Copyright (2020), Anthony C. Zinni This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. iii Abstract The US military, faced with unprecedented challenges, has sought to transform its services and other commands into more innovative organizations and has struggled in trying to understand the process to accomplish this. Studies that have been conducted to determine how best to make this transformation have not offered a comprehensive methodology or model that has proven useful. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the practices of military leadership teams and organizational innovation in historic and highly successful military commands, specifically in the World War II Pacific theater of operations, to gain insights into how current and future leadership may influence innovation. The research examined historical documents, leader accounts, and scholarly literature on innovation. Through this case study, insights were gained into how current and future leadership may influence the transformation into innovative organizations through their practices.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Recognition of a Commander's Duty to Punish War Crimes
    U.S. Recognition of a Commander’s Duty to Punish War Crimes Brian Finucane 97 INT’L L. STUD. 995 (2021) Volume 97 2021 Published by the Stockton Center for International Law ISSN 2375-2831 U.S. Recognition of a Duty to Punish War Crimes Vol. 97 U.S. Recognition of a Commander’s Duty to Punish War Crimes Brian Finucane∗ CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................................................................................. 996 II. War Crimes and Command Responsibility ......................................... 997 III. U.S. Recognition of the Duty to Punish .............................................. 998 A. U.S. Articles of War...................................................................... 998 B. Proposed Post-World War I War Crimes Tribunal ............... 1000 C. Post-World War II War Crimes Trials .................................... 1002 D. U.S. Army Field Manual and the Necessary and Reasonable Standard .................................................................. 1004 E. Codifications of the Duty to Punish and U.S. Views ............ 1005 IV. Contrary Evidence ................................................................................ 1017 V. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 1017 ∗ I thank Ian Brasure, Eugene Fidell, Ryan Goodman, Chris Jenks, and Michael Meier for their thoughtful comments. Any errors are my own. This article is adapted from Brian Finucane, A Commander’s Duty to Punish War Crimes: Past U.S. Recognition, JUST
    [Show full text]