DOCSLIB.ORG

A Vascular Flora of Bendabout Farm, Bradley County, Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Vascular Flora of Bendabout Farm, Bradley County, Tennessee A VASCULAR FLORA OF BENDABOUT FARM, BRADLEY COUNTY, TENNESSEE AND SURVEY OF NATIVE CASTANEA DENTATA (MARSH) BORKH. (FAGACEAE, AMERICAN CHESTNUT) By Amelia Paige Harris Approved: J. Hill Craddock Joey T. Shaw Professor of Biological Associate Professor of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Environmental Sciences (Co-Chairperson of Committee) (Co-Chairperson of Committee) Thomas P. Wilson Associate Professor of Biological and Environmental Sciences (Committee Member) Jeff Elwell A. Jerald Ainsworth Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Dean of the Graduate School A VASCULAR FLORA OF BENDABOUT FARM, BRADLEY COUNTY, TENNESSEE AND SURVEY OF NATIVE CASTANEA DENTATA (MARSH) BORKH. (FAGACEAE, AMERICAN CHESTNUT) By Amelia Paige Harris A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Environmental Science The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, Tennessee August 2013 ii ABSTRACT The primary goal of this study was to inventory the flora of Bendabout Farm, a 1,467 ha privately-owned farm in Bradley County, Tennessee. A second goal was to conduct a census of the population and distribution of surviving Castanea dentata (Marsh) Borkh. (American chestnut) within the study area. Both natural/semi-natural and altered habitats were described during initial habitat characterization. The study recorded 433 species from 261 genera in 106 families. The study documented 250 new records for Bradley County. Special Concern Species, Panax quinquefolius L., was vouchered, as were 68 non-native species. C. dentata were located using the sweep census method in the dry oak forest. In total, 330 ha were surveyed and 181 sprouts were documented. Maps displaying location data were generated in ArcGIS 10 to assist property managers in making best land management decisions in regard to protecting C. dentata sprouts on the farm. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my genuine gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Hill Craddock, for his boundless enthusiasm and for being a constant source of encouragement, motivation, and intellectual stimulation throughout my graduate career. I would like to thank my Co-Advisor, Dr. Joey Shaw, for inviting me into his lab and enriching my graduate experience by encouraging me to share my work with the botanical community, as well as Dr. Thomas Wilson for imparting his vast knowledge of GIS and surveying methodology. I would like to offer a most sincere thanks to Summerfield K. Johnston, Jr. for the extending the opportunity to explore and conduct my research at Bendabout Farm. Matt Bentley was critical in obtaining access, providing knowledge about the farm’s history, and making sure I wasn’t burnt to a crisp or shot while out botanizing. I would like to extend my thanks to him and to all the Bendabout Farm staff. I greatly appreciate Dollywood’s commitment to American chestnut restoration and whole-heartedly thank this organization for providing the funding for my research assistantship at UTC. The Tennessee Chapter of the American Chestnut Foundation welcomed me with open arms and provided inspiration and support throughout the duration of this project. I would like to thank Andy Carroll for providing spatial data, help with printing maps, and for being an excellent GIS guru. The UTC Graduate School was instrumental in providing the funding that allowed me to attend multiple conferences throughout the Southeast where I shared my research with colleagues and leaders in my field. iv Team Chestnut consisted of a dedicated core of individuals, without whom the chestnut census would not have been possible. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to David North, Jim Pfitzer, and William White for their tireless dedication and camaraderie. Many others volunteered their time and keen eyesight to this project including, Ana Metaxas, Carl Absher, Kristen Stanfill, Elijah Reyes, Paola Zannini, Emilio Craddock, Adam Lyon, KJ Minchew, Nicolas Perego, Jessica Jones, and Chris Livera. I have a deep appreciation for my colleagues and labmates at UTC, whose friendship has been valuable and enriching. Lastly, I would like to thank my family for their endless support throughout my journey. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ xi LIST OF SYMBOLS ................................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1 The Importance of Floras .........................................................................................3 Natural History of Castanea dentata .......................................................................6 Monitoring Threatened Species ...............................................................................7 Objectives ................................................................................................................9 II. STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................10 Geography ..............................................................................................................12 Geology and Hydrology .........................................................................................12 Soils........................................................................................................................16 Climate ...................................................................................................................17 Human History .......................................................................................................18 Current Land Use ...................................................................................................20 Access ....................................................................................................................20 Natural Disturbances ..............................................................................................21 III. METHODS ..................................................................................................................22 Habitat Characterization ........................................................................................22 Flora .......................................................................................................................23 Castanea dentata Census .......................................................................................25 IV. RESULTS & DISCUSSION........................................................................................28 vi Habitat Characterization ........................................................................................28 Floristic Summary ..................................................................................................44 Castanea dentata Census .......................................................................................52 V. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................56 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................59 APPENDIX A. Figures ....................................................................................................................66 B. Species Checklist of Bendabout Farm Flora ..........................................................75 C. List of documented Castanea dentata at Bendabout Farm with field notes ..........92 VITA ............................................................................................................................................100 vii LIST OF TABLES 1. Mean temperature and precipitation of the Cleveland Filter Plant Weather Station, Cleveland, Bradley County, Tennessee ...........................................................................18 2. Spatial data used in ArcGIS and its source of acquisition .....................................................23 3. Area of Habitats at Bendabout Farm .....................................................................................29 4. Floristic Summary of Bendabout Farm..................................................................................44 5. Families with largest percentages of introduced species .......................................................46 6. Listing and rank of the non-native, invasive taxa of Bendabout Farm from the Tennessee Exotic Pest Plant Council (2011) ...................................................................48 7. Six Ridge and Valley Floras ..................................................................................................50 viii LIST OF FIGURES 1. Location of Bendabout Farm .............................................................................................11 2. Level IV Ecoregions. Bendabout Farm in center.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 28. GALIUM Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 105. 1753
    Fl. China 19: 104–141. 2011. 28. GALIUM Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 105. 1753. 拉拉藤属 la la teng shu Chen Tao (陈涛); Friedrich Ehrendorfer Subshrubs to perennial or annual herbs. Stems often weak and clambering, often notably prickly or “sticky” (i.e., retrorsely aculeolate, “velcro-like”). Raphides present. Leaves opposite, mostly with leaflike stipules in whorls of 4, 6, or more, usually sessile or occasionally petiolate, without domatia, abaxial epidermis sometimes punctate- to striate-glandular, mostly with 1 main nerve, occasionally triplinerved or palmately veined; stipules interpetiolar and usually leaflike, sometimes reduced. Inflorescences mostly terminal and axillary (sometimes only axillary), thyrsoid to paniculiform or subcapitate, cymes several to many flowered or in- frequently reduced to 1 flower, pedunculate to sessile, bracteate or bracts reduced especially on higher order axes [or bracts some- times leaflike and involucral], bracteoles at pedicels lacking. Flowers mostly bisexual and monomorphic, hermaphroditic, sometimes unisexual, andromonoecious, occasionally polygamo-dioecious or dioecious, pedicellate to sessile, usually quite small. Calyx with limb nearly always reduced to absent; hypanthium portion fused with ovary. Corolla white, yellow, yellow-green, green, more rarely pink, red, dark red, or purple, rotate to occasionally campanulate or broadly funnelform; tube sometimes so reduced as to give appearance of free petals, glabrous inside; lobes (3 or)4(or occasionally 5), valvate in bud. Stamens (3 or)4(or occasionally 5), inserted on corolla tube near base, exserted; filaments developed to ± reduced; anthers dorsifixed. Inferior ovary 2-celled, ± didymous, ovoid, ellipsoid, or globose, smooth, papillose, tuberculate, or with hooked or rarely straight trichomes, 1 erect and axile ovule in each cell; stigmas 2-lobed, exserted.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Domain Management Plan
    Domain Management Plan 2019-2029 FINAL DRAFT 12/20/2019 Owner Contact: Amy Turner, Ph.D., CWB Director of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability The University of the South Sewanee, Tennessee Office: 931-598-1447 Office: Cleveland Annex 110C Email: [email protected] Reviewed by: The Nature Conservancy Forest Stewards Guild ____________________________________________________________________________ Tract Location: Franklin and Marion Counties, Tennessee Centroid Latitude 35.982963 Longitude -85.344382 Tract Size: 13,036 acres | 5,275 hectares Land Manager: Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability, The University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee 2 Executive Summary The primary objective of this management plan is to provide a framework to outline future management and outline operations for the Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability (OESS) over the next ten years. In this plan, we will briefly introduce the physical and biological setting, past land use, and current uses of the Domain. The remainder of the plan consists of an assessment of the forest, which has been divided into six conservation areas. These conservation areas contain multiple management compartments, and the six areas have similarities in topographical position and past land use. Finally, the desired future condition and project summary of each conservation area and compartment has been outlined. Background The University of the South consists of an academic campus (382 acres) with adjacent commercial and residential areas (783 acres) that are embedded within and surrounded by diverse natural lands (11,838 acres). The term “Domain” is used interchangeably to describe both the entire ~13,000 acres and the 11,800-acre natural land matrix (also referred to as the “Greater Domain”).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Tennessee Instructor Copy
    Copy This chapter is an edited version An Overview of the Physical of a manuscript by the same title Environment, Flora, and written by Edward W. Chester. Vegetation of Tennessee In addition to editing, some 2 material has been deleted from and some added to the original Instructormanuscript by the editors of this publication. Portions of the original manuscript were condensed from Guide to the Vascular Plants of Tennessee, compiled and edited by the Tennessee Flora Committee. Copyright © 2015 by The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. Used by permission granted to Edward W. Chester. See author’s notes for additional Tennessee information. of University Copy AUTHOR'S NOTES A more complete discussion of the topics in this chapter can be found in Chapter 1, “The Physical Environment of Tennessee” (written by Edward W. Chester) and Chapter 3, ”An Overview of the Vegetation of Tennessee” (coauthored by Hal R. DeSelm and William H. Martin) in the Guide to the Vascular Plants of Tennessee referenced at the beginning of this chapter. The contents of the two chapters are based on almost 200 combined years of study by the three authors and the nearly 100 references they cite. The authors are: Instructor Edward W. Chester, Professor Emeritus of Biology and Botany, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tenn. Hal R. DeSelm (deceased), Professor Emeritus of Botany and the Graduate Program in Ecology, University of Tennessee at Knoxville. Dr. DeSelm died on July 12, 2011. William H. Martin, Professor Emeritus of Biology and Director of the Division of Natural Areas, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond. He served as Commissioner of Kentucky's Department for Natural Resources from 1992 to 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Conservation Priorities to Wetland and Stream Mitigation Decisions
    A watershed planning approach for the Stones River, Tennessee Linking Conservation Priorities to Wetland and Stream Mitigation Decisions A watershed planning approach for the Stones River, Tennessee A watershed planning approach for the Stones River, Tennessee Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of several individuals and agencies that have contributed to the design and execution of this project. Kathleen Kuná with the regulatory branch of the Nashville District Corps of Engineers enthusiastically provided her leadership at the stakeholder workshop and her support through the plan’s development and review. Mike Lee with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Water Pollution Control (TDEC-WPC) guided our methodological approach and shared knowledge from his years of experience with wetland permitting decisions. Members of the Tennessee Interagency Review Team for mitigation engaged with The Nature Conservancy (TNC) planning team during critical planning phases, advised us on available data, and critiqued our methodology and analysis results. These team members included Kim Pilarski - Tennessee Valley Authority, Rob Todd – Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Robbie Sykes – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Mike Zeman – U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Dr. Ken Morgan from Tennessee Technological University shared his technical knowledge regarding wetland field determinations and the proper applications of spatial data. Dan Eagar with the TDEC-WPC’s Natural Resources section participated in technical review meetings provided advice on stream mitigation regulatory issues. The Environmental Law Institute (ELI) has conducted research on wetland mitigation for over two decades. This project benefitted greatly from ELI’s efforts and publications on many aspects of wetland laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Inventory and Ecological Community Classification for Cumberland Gap National Historical Park
    VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY AND ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION FOR CUMBERLAND GAP NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK Report for the Vertebrate and Vascular Plant Inventories: Appalachian Highlands and Cumberland/Piedmont Networks Prepared by NatureServe for the National Park Service Southeast Regional Office March 2006 NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific knowledge that forms the basis for effective conservation action. Citation: Rickie D. White, Jr. 2006. Vascular Plant Inventory and Ecological Community Classification for Cumberland Gap National Historical Park. Durham, North Carolina: NatureServe. © 2006 NatureServe NatureServe 6114 Fayetteville Road, Suite 109 Durham, NC 27713 919-484-7857 International Headquarters 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 www.natureserve.org National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Atlanta Federal Center 1924 Building 100 Alabama Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 The view and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report consists of the main report along with a series of appendices with information about the plants and plant (ecological) communities found at the site. Electronic files have been provided to the National Park Service in addition to hard copies. Current information on all communities described here can be found on NatureServe Explorer at www.natureserveexplorer.org. Cover photo: Red cedar snag above White Rocks at Cumberland Gap National Historical Park. Photo by Rickie White. ii Acknowledgments I wish to thank all park employees, co-workers, volunteers, and academics who helped with aspects of the preparation, field work, specimen identification, and report writing for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Kimberly Norton Taylor1 and Dwayne Estes
    The floristic and community ecology of seasonally wet limestone glade seeps of Tennessee and Kentucky Kimberly Norton Taylor1 and Dwayne Estes Austin Peay State University Department of Biology and Center of Excellence for Field Biology Clarksville, Tennessee 37044, U.S.A. [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT An open, seasonally wet seep community supporting herbaceous vegetation occurs within the limestone cedar glade complex of the southeastern United States. The purpose of this study is to describe the floristic composition of these limestone glade seeps. A floristic inventory of 9 season- ally wet sites in central Tennessee and south-central Kentucky was performed, documenting 114 species and infraspecific taxa in 91 genera and 43 families. Vegetation analysis identified the dominant taxa as Eleocharis bifida (% IV 20.3), Sporobolus vaginiflorus (% IV 11.94), Hypericum sphaerocarpum (% IV 5.97), Allium aff. stellatum (% IV 4.71), Clinopodium glabellum/arkansanum (% IV 4.15), Schoenolirion croceum (% IV 3.89), Juncus filipendulus (% IV 3.89), and Carex crawei (% IV 3.84). Gratiola quartermaniae and Isoëtes butleri are also important members of the community and may serve as indicator species. A wetland assessment of the seep community was performed according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and appropriate regional supplements. Wetland vegetation requirements are satisfied in 8 of the 9 seasonally wet sites sampled. The limestone glade seeps appear to represent a previously unclassified seasonal wetland type. RESUMEN Una comunidad abierta, húmeda estacionalmente por filtración, compuesta por vegetación herbácea se da en el complejo de pantanos cal- cáreos de cedro del sureste de los Estados Unidos.
    [Show full text]
  • Rubiaceae): Evolution of Major Clades, Development of Leaf-Like Whorls, and Biogeography
    TAXON 59 (3) • June 2010: 755–771 Soza & Olmstead • Molecular systematics of Rubieae Molecular systematics of tribe Rubieae (Rubiaceae): Evolution of major clades, development of leaf-like whorls, and biogeography Valerie L. Soza & Richard G. Olmstead Department of Biology, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195-5325, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Valerie L. Soza, [email protected] Abstract Rubieae are centered in temperate regions and characterized by whorls of leaf-like structures on their stems. Previous studies that primarily included Old World taxa identified seven major clades with no resolution between and within clades. In this study, a molecular phylogeny of the tribe, based on three chloroplast regions (rpoB-trnC, trnC-psbM, trnL-trnF-ndhJ) from 126 Old and New World taxa, is estimated using parsimony and Bayesian analyses. Seven major clades are strongly supported within the tribe, confirming previous studies. Relationships within and between these seven major clades are also strongly supported. In addition, the position of Callipeltis, a previously unsampled genus, is identified. The resulting phylogeny is used to examine geographic distribution patterns and evolution of leaf-like whorls in the tribe. An Old World origin of the tribe is inferred from parsimony and likelihood ancestral state reconstructions. At least eight subsequent dispersal events into North America occurred from Old World ancestors. From one of these dispersal events, a radiation into North America, followed by subsequent diversification in South America, occurred. Parsimony and likelihood ancestral state reconstructions infer the ancestral whorl morphology of the tribe as composed of six organs. Whorls composed of four organs are derived from whorls with six or more organs.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidago Notable Native Herb™ 2017
    The Herb Society of America’s Essential Guide to Solidago Notable Native Herb™ 2017 An HSA Native Herb Selection 1 Medical Disclaimer Published by It is the policy of The Herb Society Native Herb Conservation Committee of America not to advise or The Herb Society of America, Inc. recommend herbs for medicinal or Spring 2016. health use. This information is intended for educational purposes With grateful appreciation for assistance with only and should not be considered research, writing, photography, and editing: as a recommendation or an Katherine Schlosser, committee chair endorsement of any particular Susan Betz medical or health treatment. Carol Ann Harlos Elizabeth Kennel Debra Knapke Maryann Readal Dava Stravinsky Lois Sutton Linda Wells Thanks also to Karen O’Brien, Botany & Horticulture Chair, and Jackie Johnson, Publications Chair, for their assistance and encouragement. Note on Nomenclature Where noted, botanical names have been updated following: GRIN—US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Germplasm Resource Information Network. Available from http://www.ars-grin.gov/ The Plant List—A working list of all plant species. Version 1.1 K. K. Schlosser Available from: http://www.theplantlist.org/ FRONT COVER and above: Solidago gigantea ITIS—Integrated Taxonomic Information System. A partnership of federal agencies formed to satisfy their mutual in West Jefferson, NC, in September. needs for scientifically credible taxonomic information. Available from: http://www.itis.gov/# 2 Susan Betz Table of Contents An
    [Show full text]
  • Flora-Lab-Manual.Pdf
    LabLab MManualanual ttoo tthehe Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros Flora of New Mexico Lab Manual to the Flora of New Mexico Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros University of New Mexico Herbarium Museum of Southwestern Biology MSC03 2020 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA 87131-0001 October 2009 Contents page Introduction VI Acknowledgments VI Seed Plant Phylogeny 1 Timeline for the Evolution of Seed Plants 2 Non-fl owering Seed Plants 3 Order Gnetales Ephedraceae 4 Order (ungrouped) The Conifers Cupressaceae 5 Pinaceae 8 Field Trips 13 Sandia Crest 14 Las Huertas Canyon 20 Sevilleta 24 West Mesa 30 Rio Grande Bosque 34 Flowering Seed Plants- The Monocots 40 Order Alistmatales Lemnaceae 41 Order Asparagales Iridaceae 42 Orchidaceae 43 Order Commelinales Commelinaceae 45 Order Liliales Liliaceae 46 Order Poales Cyperaceae 47 Juncaceae 49 Poaceae 50 Typhaceae 53 Flowering Seed Plants- The Eudicots 54 Order (ungrouped) Nymphaeaceae 55 Order Proteales Platanaceae 56 Order Ranunculales Berberidaceae 57 Papaveraceae 58 Ranunculaceae 59 III page Core Eudicots 61 Saxifragales Crassulaceae 62 Saxifragaceae 63 Rosids Order Zygophyllales Zygophyllaceae 64 Rosid I Order Cucurbitales Cucurbitaceae 65 Order Fabales Fabaceae 66 Order Fagales Betulaceae 69 Fagaceae 70 Juglandaceae 71 Order Malpighiales Euphorbiaceae 72 Linaceae 73 Salicaceae 74 Violaceae 75 Order Rosales Elaeagnaceae 76 Rosaceae 77 Ulmaceae 81 Rosid II Order Brassicales Brassicaceae 82 Capparaceae 84 Order Geraniales Geraniaceae 85 Order Malvales Malvaceae 86 Order Myrtales Onagraceae
    [Show full text]
  • 14Th Symposium Proceedings
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH SYMPOSIUM ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF LOWER TENNESSEE AND CUMBERLAND RIVER VALLEYS BRANDON SPRING GROUP CAMP LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES MARCH 25 AND 26, 2011 SPONS0RED BY AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY THE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR FIELD BIOLOGY AND MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY WATERSHED STUDIES INSTITUTE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Austin Peay State University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age in its programs and activities. The Director of Affirmative Action has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies and can be reached at 601 College Street, Browning Bldg. Room 7A, Clarksville, TN 37044, 931-221-7178, [email protected]. (AP33/7-13/100) TH PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14 SYMPOSIUM ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF LOWER TENNESSEE AND CUMBERLAND RIVER VALLEYS HELD AT BRANDON SPRING GROUP CAMP LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES MARCH 25 AND 26, 2011 Sponsored by: The Center of Excellence for Field Biology Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tennessee and Watershed Studies Institute Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Land Between The Lakes National Recreation Area Golden Pond, Kentucky ******* EDITED BY: Rebecca Johansen, L. Dwayne Estes, Steven W. Hamilton, and Andrew N. Barrass Published by and available from: The Center of Excellence for Field Biology Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tennessee 37044 Price: $5.00 SUGGESTED CITATION Johansen, R., L.D.Austin Estes, PeayS.W. Hamilton,State Universit and A.N.y, Clarksville, Barrass (Editors). Tennessee 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • W4T-Tennessee)
    Summits on the Air USA (W4T-Tennessee) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S72.1 Issue number 1.1 Date of issue 1st December 2016 Participation start date 28th April 2012 Authorized: 04-28-2012 by SOTA Management Team Association Manager: Walter Beaton, NE4TN ([email protected]) Summits-on-the-Air An original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI. Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Program. This document is copyright of the Program. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air – ARM for USA (W4T-Tennessee) Table of Contents 1.0 Change Control ...............................................................................................................................................3 Disclaimer ...................................................................................................................................................................3 Copyright Notices .......................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Association Reference Data ............................................................................................................................4 2.1 Program Derivation ........................................................................................................................................5 2.2 General Information .......................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]