DOCSLIB.ORG

Příloha Č. 1: Tabulka Endemitních Rostlin ČR – České Názvy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Příloha Č. 1: Tabulka Endemitních Rostlin ČR – České Názvy Příloha č. 1: Tabulka endemitních rostlin ČR – české názvy. Zpracování autorka, 28. 9. 2010. Říše Pod říše Odd ělení Třída Řád Čele ď Rod Druh Poddruh prstnatec český ch řestotvaré vstava čovité prstnatec prstnatec Trausteiner ův prstnatec Trausteiner ův karpatský jednod ěložné lipnicovité lipnice lipnice jesenická lipnicotvaré šáchorovité ost řice ost řice pozdní ost řice pozdní krkonošská bublinatkovité tu čnice tu čnice česká hluchavkotvaré jitrocelovité jitrocel jitrocel černavý jitrocel černavý sudetský zárazovité všivec všivec krkonošský ho řcovité ho řeček ho řeček český ho řcotvaré mo řenovité svízel svízel sudetský zvonek český jesenický zvonek český zvonkovité zvonek zvonek český pravý zvonek okrouhlolistý zvonek okrouhlolistý sudetský jest řábník černavý jest řábník černoblizný jest řábník černohlavý jest řábník draslavý jest řábník kopis ťolistý jest řábník krkonošský jest řábník labský jest řábník licholabský jest řábník Rohlen ův hv ězdicotvaré jest řábník Schneider ův jest řábník jest řábník Schustler ův hv ězdicovité jest řábník severský jest řábník sn ěžnický jest řábník stopkatý jest řábník špi čkatý jest řábník tmavožlutý jest řábník tmavožlutý žlázkozubý jest řábník trubkovitý rostliny zelené rostliny krytosemenné jest řábník Uechtritz ův jest řábník zelenohlavý Rosopsida jest řábník zlatoblizný pampeliška pampeliška krkonošská sta řinec sta řinec dlouholistý sta řinec dlouholistý moravský rožec rožec ku řičkolistý ku řička krkonošská ku řička ku řička Smejkalova hvozdík kartouzek sudetský hvozdíkotvaré hvozdíkovité hvozdík kartouzek hvozdík kartouzek úzkolistý hvozdík hvozdík Lumnitzer ův hvozdík Lumnitzer ův pálavský hvozdík moravský hvozdík píse čný hvozdík píse čný český je řáb český je řáb dubolistý je řáb džbánský je řáb hardeggský je řáb krasový je řáb je řáb krkonošský růžotvaré růžovité je řáb labský je řáb man ětínský je řáb milský je řáb olšolistý je řáb sout ězkový kontryhel kontryhel tupý kontryhel tupý lichob ěžníkový mochna mochna chlumní mochna chlumní st ředo česká om ěj šalamounek prysky řníkotvaré prysky řníkovité om ěj om ěj tuhý om ěj tuhý moravský vřesovcotvaré prvosenkovité kruhatka kruhatka Mattioliho kruhatka Mattioliho moravská št ětkotvaré št ětkovité chrastavec chrastavec rolní chrastavec rolní krkonošský Příloha č. 2: Tabulka endemitních rostlin ČR – latinské názvy. Zpracování autorka, 28. 9. 2010. Regnum Subregnum Divisio Classis Ordo Familia Genus Species Subspecies Dactylorhiza bohemica Asparagales Orchidaceae Dactylorhiza Dactylorhiza Dactylorhiza traunsteineri carpatica Liliopsida traunsteineri Poaceae Poa Poa riphea Poales Cyperaceae Carex Carex viridula Carex viridula pseudoscandinavica Lentibulariaceae Pinguicula Pinguicula bohemica Lamiales Plantaginaceae Plantago Plantago atrata Plantago atrata sudetica Orobanchaceae Pedicularis Pedicularis sudetica Gentianaceae Gentianella Gentianella bohemica Gentianales Rubiaceae Galium Galium sudeticum Campanula bohemica gelida Campanula bohemica Campanulaceae Campanula Campanula bohemica bohemica Campanula rotundifolia Campanula rotundifolia sudetica Hietacium nigrescens Hietacium nigrostylum Hietacium melanocephalum Hietacium asperulum Hietacium fritzei Hietacium corconticum Hietacium albinum Hietacium pseudoalbinum Hietacium rohlenae Hietacium schneiderianum Asterales Hietacium Hietacium schustleri Asteraceae Hietacium riphaeum Hietacium nivimontis Hietacium pedunculare Hietacium apiculatum Hietacium bocceonei Hietacium bocceonei glandulosodentatum Hietacium tubulosum Hietacium Plantae Viridiplantae Magnoliophyta uechtritzianum Hietacium Rosopsida chlorocephalum Hietacium chrysostyloides Taraxacum Taraxacum alpestre Tephroseris Tephroseris longifolia Tephroseris longifolia moravica Cerastium Cerastium alsinifolium Minuartia corcontica Minuartia Minuartia smejkalii Dianthus carthusianorum sudeticus Dianthus Caryophyllales Caryophyllaceae Dianthus carthusianorum carthusianorum capillifrons Dianthus Dianthus lumnitzeri Dianthus lumnitzeri palaviensis Dianthus moravicus Dianthus arenarius Dianthus arenarius bohemicus Sorbus bohemica Sorbus quernea Sorbus gemella Sorbus hardeggensis Sorbus eximia Sorbus sudetica Sorbus Sorbus albensis Rosales Rosaceae Sorbus rhodanthera Sorbus milensis Sorbus alnifrons Sorbus portae- bohemicae Alchemilla Alchemilla obtusa Alchemilla obtusa trapezialis Potentilla Potentilla collina Potentilla collina lindackeri Aconitum callibotryon Ranunculales Ranunculaceae Aconitum Aconitum firmum Aconitum firmum moravicum Ericales Primulaceae Cortusa Cortusa matthioli Cortusa matthioli moravica Dipsacales Dipsacaceae Knautia Knautia arvensis Knautia arvensis pseudolongifolia Obr. č. 3: Ho řeček český. http://botany.cz/cs/gentianella-praecox/ Obr. č. 4: Hvozdík sudetský. http://botany.cz/cs/dianthus-sudeticus/ Obr. č. 5: Hvozdík úzkolistý. http://botany.cz/cs/dianthus-capillifrons/ Obr. č. 6: Hvozdík pálavský. http://www.biolib.cz/cz/taxonimage/id84615/?taxonid=38636 Obr. č. 7: Hvozdík moravský. http://botany.cz/cs/dianthus-moravicus/ Obr. č. 8: Hvozdík český. http://botany.cz/cs/dianthus-bohemicus/ Obr. č. 9: Chrastavec krkonošský. http://www.biolib.cz/cz/taxonimage/id125237/?taxonid=40523 Obr. č. 10: Je řáb český. http://www.rostliny.net/show.php?adr=Sorbus&src=SorbusBohemica2.jpg Obr. č. 11: Je řáb dubolistý. http://botany.cz/cs/sorbus-quernea/ Obr. č. 12: Je řáb džbánský. http://botany.cz/cs/sorbus-gemella/ Obr. č. 13: Je řáb hardeggský. http://www.biolib.cz/cz/taxonimage/id120123/?taxonid=39571 Obr. č. 14: Je řáb krasový. http://www.kvetena.com/jablonovite.html Obr. č. 15: Je řáb krkonošský. http://www.naturabohemica.cz/sorbus-sudetica/ Obr. č. 16: Je řáb labský. http://botany.cz/cs/sorbus-albensis/ Obr. č. 17: Je řáb man ětínský. http://www.biolib.cz/cz/taxonimage/id18396/?taxonid=39574 Obr. č. 18: Je řáb milský. http://botany.cz/cs/sorbus-milensis/ Obr. č. 19: Je řáb olšolistý. http://www.biolib.cz/cz/taxonimage/id131172/?taxonid=39558 Obr. č. 20: Je řáb sout ěskový. http://botany.cz/cs/sorbus-portae-bohemicae/ Obr. č. 21: Jest řábník. http://www.plant-identification.co.uk/skye/compositae/hieracium- pilosella.htm Obr. č. 22: Jitrocel sudetský. http://www.naturabohemica.cz/plantago-atrata-subsp-sudetica/ Obr. č. 23: Kruhatka Mattioliho. http://botany.cz/cs/cortusa-matthioli/ Obr. č. 24: Ku řička Krkonošská. http://www.biolib.cz/cz/taxonimage/id125217/?taxonid=38508 Obr. č. 25: Ku řička Smejkalova. http://www.naturabohemica.cz/minuartia-smejkalii/ Obr. č. 26: Lipnice jesenická. http://www.biolib.cz/cz/taxonimage/id32962/?taxonid=42439 Obr. č. 27: Mochna st ředo česká. http://prirodakarlovarska.cz/clanky/ohrozene-druhy-rostlin- a-zivocichu Obr. č. 28: Om ěj šalamounek. http://botanika.wendys.cz/kytky/foto.php?153: Obr. č. 29: Om ěj moravský. http://botany.cz/cs/aconitum-moravicum/ Obr. č. 30: Ost řice krkonošská. http://botany.cz/cs/carex-viridula-pseudoscandinavica/ Obr. č. 31: Prstnatec karpatský. http://botany.cz/cs/dactylorhiza-traunsteineri-carpatica/ Obr. č. 32: Rožec ku řičkolistý. http://botany.cz/cs/cerastium-alsinifolium/ Obr. č. 33: Sta řinec moravský. http://www.biomonitoring.cz/druhy.php?druhID=94 Obr. č. 34: Svízel sudetský. http://botany.cz/cs/galium-sudeticum/ Obr. č. 35: Tu čnice česká. http://www.enviport.cz/tucnice-ceska-pinguicula-b.aspx Obr. č. 36: Všivec krkonošský. http://botany.cz/cs/pedicularis-sudetica/ Obr. č. 37: Zvonek český. http://botany.cz/cs/campanula-bohemica/ Obr. č. 38: Zvonek sudetský. http://botany.cz/cs/campanula-sudetica/ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction the Genus Aconitum L. (Ranunculaceae Juss.) Is an Interesting Taxonomical Group Which Is Characterized by High Leve
    Modern Phytomorphology 9 (Suppl.): 35–73, 2016 SOME NOTES ON THE GENUS ACONITUM IN CHORNOHOra MTS. Andrew V. Novikoff 1*, Józef Mitka 2, Alexander Kuzyarin 1, Oleg Orlov 1, Marina Ragulina 1 Abstract. The paper is a contribution to ecology and chorology ofAconitum in high-mountain zone of the Ukrainian Carpathians. It was confirmed that genusAconitum in the Chornogora mountain range is represented by 14 taxa, and 7 more taxa were listed as potential for this region. These taxa belong to 3 subgenera and are divided on 4 main biomorphological groups delimited on the base of their habitat, life form, ecology and altitudinal distribution. The soil and vegetation types for all taxa have been identified and the maps of their distribution have been prepared. The most influent threats and their categories were identified. Threat category for A. × nanum was changed from DD to VU, and for A. firmum subsp. fussianum from NT to VU. Key words: Aconitum, Chornogora, sozology, ecology, chorology, soils, vegetation 1 State Natural History Museum NAS of Ukraine, Teatralna str. 18, 79008 Lviv, Ukraine; * [email protected] 2 Institute of Botany of Jagiellonian University, Botanical Garden, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 27, 31-501 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] Introduction (19 confirmed + 3 unconfirmedAconitum taxa) 9 species and subspecies are listed as clearly The genusAconitum L. (Ranunculaceae endemic or subendemic and 2 more hybrid Juss.) is an interesting taxonomical group which subspecies are considered as probably endemic is characterized by high level of morphological (Novikoff & Hurdu 2015). From other side, diversity, presence of a number of subspecific if we consider all forms and varieties then we taxa, and high number of both infra- and can tell about 17 subendemic and endemic taxa interspecific natural hybrids Gáyer( 1922; in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Raport Stiintific Si Tehnic 2010.Pdf
    MINISTERUL EDUCAŢIEI, CERCETĂRII, TINERETULUI ŞI SPORTULUI UNIVERSITATEA DE ŞTIINŢE AGRICOLE ŞI MEDICINĂ VETERINARĂ “ION IONESCU DE LA BRAD“ Aleea M. Sadoveanu nr. 3, 700490 – IAŞI, ROMÂNIA Tel. +40-232-213069/260650 Fax. +40-232-260650 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.uaiasi.ro PROGRAMUL 4: “Parteneriate în domeniile prioritare” Categoria de proiecte: PROIECTE COMPLEXE – PC Direcţia de cercetare: 5.1. Contract de finanţare nr. 52-174/2008 Contractor: UNIVERSITATEA DE ŞTIINŢE AGRICOLE ŞI MEDICINĂ VETERINARĂ “ION IONESCU DE LA BRAD” IAŞI Parteneri: P1 – Universitatea Bucureşti P2 – Universitatea “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi P3 - Staţiunea de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Legumicultură Bacău P4 – S.C. “PLASTPROD” SRL Iaşi RAPORTUL ŞTIINŢIFIC ŞI TEHNIC (RST) la proiectul “VALORIFICAREA BIODIVERSITĂŢII FLOREI SPONTANE DIN ROMÂNIA, ÎN SCOPUL ÎMBOGĂŢIRII SORTIMENTULUI DE PLANTE ORNAMENTALE” - BIODIVDECOR Etapa III/2010 Denumirea etapei: “Colectarea, stocarea, înmulţirea şi studiul taxonilor. Studiul materialelor biodegradabile” Director proiect: Prof. univ. dr. Lucia DRAGHIA PROGRAMUL 4 “PARTENERIATE IN DOMENIILE PRIORITARE” 2007-2013 CUPRINS I. Obiective generale …………………………………………………..…… 2 II. Obiectivele etapei de execuţie ............................................ 2 III. Rezumatul etapei ............................................................... 3 IV Rezultate obţinute (descrierea ştiinţifică şi tehnică ............. 5 4.1. Activitatea 1. Analiza activităţii din etapaII. Training. Elaborare plan de lucru etapa III ……………………………………………………. 5
    [Show full text]
  • Sisakvirág Diterpén-Alkaloidok Izolálása, Szerkezetmeghatározása És Farmakológiai Aktivitásának Vizsgálata
    12. Vajdasági Magyar Tudományos Diákköri Konferencia TUDOMÁNYOS DIÁKKÖRI DOLGOZAT SISAKVIRÁG DITERPÉN-ALKALOIDOK IZOLÁLÁSA, SZERKEZETMEGHATÁROZÁSA ÉS FARMAKOLÓGIAI AKTIVITÁSÁNAK VIZSGÁLATA KISS TIVADAR PhD hallgató Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Gyógyszerésztudományi Kar Farmakognóziai Intézet Témavezetők: PROF. DR. HOHMANN JUDIT egyetemi tanár DR. CSUPOR DEZSŐ egyetemi adjunktus Újvidék 2013. Tartalomjegyzék I. Bevezetés ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Irodalmi áttekintés ................................................................................................. 4 II. 1. Az Aconitum (sisakvirág) nemzetség előfordulása, botanikai és rendszertani áttekintése .......................................................................................................................... 4 II. 2. A sisakvirág nemzetség gyógyászati alkalmazása ........................................ 6 II. 3. Diterpén-alkaloidok – a nemzetség jellemző vegyületcsoportja ................... 6 II. 4. Diterpén-alkaloidok bioszintézise ................................................................. 7 II. 5. A diterpén-alkaloidok farmakológiai hatása ............................................... 10 III. Anyag és módszer .............................................................................................. 12 III. 1. A növényi nyersanyag ............................................................................... 12 III. 2. Kivonási módszer kidolgozása .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Aconitum Subgenus Aconitum in Europe
    Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae Article ID: 8933 DOI: 10.5586/asbp.8933 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER in RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TAXONOMY AND PHYLOGENY OF PLANTS Publication History Received: 2020-01-08 Accepted: 2020-07-03 Phylogeny of Aconitum Subgenus Aconitum Published: 2020-10-08 in Europe Handling Editor Agnieszka Popiela, University of Szczecin, Poland; 1 2 3 Piotr Boroń , Ada Wróblewska , Bogusław Binkiewicz , https://orcid.org/0000-0001- 3* 9297-0538 Józef Mitka 1Department of Forest Pathology, Mycology and Tree Physiology, University of Agriculture in , Authors Contributions Krakow, 29 Listopada 46, Kraków, 31-425, Poland PB and AW conceived and 2Institute of Biology, Faculty Biology and Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Ciołkowskiego designed the analysis, performed 1J, Białystok, 15-245, Poland molecular analyses, and 3Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Kraków, 31-501, interpreted the data; BB Poland contributed to data analysis tools; JM performed the statistical *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected] analyses and drafted the manuscript Abstract Funding This work was funded by a Phylogenetic relations within Aconitum subgen. Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) in KBN/NCN grant (N303 814440) to Europe are still unclear. To infer the phylogeny of the nuclear (ITS) region and JM. chloroplast intergenic spacer trnL(UAG)-ndhF of the chloroplast DNA (cpDNA), Competing Interests we analyzed 64 accessions within this taxon, 58 from Europe and six from the No competing interests have Caucasus Mts. Nuclear ITS sequences were identical in 51 European and two been declared. Caucasian accessions, whereas the remaining sequences were unique. cpDNA sequences could be categorized into fve haplotypes, i.e., A–E, including a Copyright Notice European-Caucasian Aconitum haplotype B.
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Vascular Plants of the Czech Republic: 3Rd Edition
    Preslia 84: 631–645, 2012 631 Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition Červený seznam cévnatých rostlin České republiky: třetí vydání Dedicated to the centenary of the Czech Botanical Society (1912–2012) VítGrulich Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-611 37 Brno, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Grulich V. (2012): Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition. – Preslia 84: 631–645. The knowledge of the flora of the Czech Republic has substantially improved since the second ver- sion of the national Red List was published, mainly due to large-scale field recording during the last decade and the resulting large national databases. In this paper, an updated Red List is presented and compared with the previous editions of 1979 and 2000. The complete updated Red List consists of 1720 taxa (listed in Electronic Appendix 1), accounting for more then a half (59.2%) of the native flora of the Czech Republic. Of the Red-Listed taxa, 156 (9.1% of the total number on the list) are in the A categories, which include taxa that have vanished from the flora or are not known to occur at present, 471 (27.4%) are classified as critically threatened, 357 (20.8%) as threatened and 356 (20.7%) as endangered. From 1979 to 2000 to 2012, there has been an increase in the total number of taxa included in the Red List (from 1190 to 1627 to 1720) and in most categories, mainly for the following reasons: (i) The continuing human pressure on many natural and semi-natural habitats is reflected in the increased vulnerability or level of threat to many vascular plants; some vulnerable species therefore became endangered, those endangered critically threatened, while species until recently not classified may be included in the Red List as vulnerable or even endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Key to the Alberta Figworts & Allies
    AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE ALBERTA FIGWORTS & ALLIES OROBANCHACEAE PHRYMACEAE PLANTAGINACEAE SCROPHULARIACEAE Compiled and writen by Lorna Allen & Linda Kershaw April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen Key to Figwort and Allies Families In the past few years, the families Orobanchaceae, Plantaginaceae and Scrophulariaceae have under- gone some major revision and reorganization. Most of the species in the Scrophulariaceae in the Flora of Alberta (1983) are now in the Orobanchaceae and Plantaginaceae. For this reason, we’ve grouped the Orobanchaceae, Plantaginaceae, Phrymaceae and Scrophulariaceae together in this fle. In addition, species previously placed in the Callitrichaceae and Hippuridaceae families are now included in the Plantaginaceae family. 01a Plants aquatic, with many or all leaves submersed and limp when taken from the 1a water; leaves paired or in rings (whorled) on the stem, all or mostly linear (foating leaves sometimes spatula- to egg-shaped); fowers tiny (1-2 mm), single or clustered in leaf axils; petals and sepals absent or sepals fused in a cylinder around the ovary; stamens 0-1 . Plantaginaceae (in part) . - Callitriche, Hippuris 01b Plants emergent wetland species (with upper stems and leaves held above water) or upland species with self-supporting stems and leaves; leaves not as above; fowers larger, single or in clusters; petals and sepals present; stamens 2-4 (Hippuris sometimes emergent, but leaves/ fowers distinctive) . .02 2a 02a Plants without green leaves . Orobanchaceae (in part) . - Aphyllon [Orobanche], Boschniakia 02b Plants with green leaves . 03 03a Leaves all basal (sometimes small, unstalked stem leaves present), undivided (simple), with edges ± smooth or blunt-toothed; fowers small (2-5 mm wide), corollas radially symmetrical, sometimes absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Natural Heritage Program National Park Service Alaska
    GLACIER BAY NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY GLACIER BAY NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Matthew L. Carlson, Keith Boggs, Robert Lipkin, & Julie A. Michaelson Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 National Park Service Alaska Region Inventory & Monitoring Program NPS Report : April 2004 Cooperative Agreement No. 1443CA991000013 Funding Source: National Park Service, Inventory & Monitoring Program 1 GLACIER BAY NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY ABSTRACT In 2001 and 2003 the Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP) conducted vascular plant field inventories in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve in accordance with a cooperative agreement with the National Park Service. The primary goal was to document greater than 90% of the vascular plant species expected to occur within the park and significantly improve our understanding of current species distributions. The inventory targeted diverse habitat types and poorly-sampled areas. The AKNHP staff visited eight diverse ecogeographic regions and sampled intensively within these regions from late June to mid-August, 2001 and late June to early July in 2003. A total of 555 specimens were collected, recorded, pressed, and curated. Of the 333 individual taxa, 172 are new records for the park and an additional 44 represent verifications of previously unverified reports. A number of finds were significant range extensions or taxa of conservation concern. Collections were made of four globally restricted species: Botrychium ascendens (G2G3-S2 AKNHP rank), Platanthera chorisiana (G3-S3), Eleocharis kamtschatica (G4-S2S3), and Salix setchelliana (G4-S3). A number of collections were made of species which are very rare in Alaska, but more widespread in western North America, such as Agoseris aurantiaca, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytochemical, Pharmacological and Toxicological Studies of Alkaloid- and Sesquiterpene Lactone- Containing Medicinal Plants
    University of Szeged Faculty of Pharmacy Department of Pharmacognosy PHYTOCHEMICAL, PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES OF ALKALOID- AND SESQUITERPENE LACTONE- CONTAINING MEDICINAL PLANTS Ph.D. Thesis Tivadar Kiss Supervisors: Prof. Judit Hohmann DSc. Dezső Csupor PhD. Szeged, Hungary 2017 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS RELATED TO THE THESIS I. Kiss T; Orvos P; Bánsághi Sz; Forgó P; Jedlinszki N; Tálosi L; Hohmann J; Csupor D. Identification of diterpene alkaloids from Aconitum napellus subsp. firmum and GIRK channel activities of some Aconitum alkaloids FITOTERAPIA 2013; 90: 85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2013.07.010 II. Kiss T; Szabó A; Oszánci G; Lukács A; Tímár Z; Tiszlavicz L; Csupor D. Repeated-dose toxicity of common ragweed on rats PLOS ONE 2017; 12: e0176818 (18p) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176818 III. Kiss T; Borcsa B; Orvos P; Tálosi L; Hohmann J; Csupor D. Diterpene lipo-alkaloids with selective activities on cardiac K+ channels PLANTA MEDICA 2017; accepted doi: 10.1055/s-0043-109556 IV. Kiss T; Mácsai L; Csupor D; Datki Zs. In vivo screening of diterpene alkaloids using bdelloid rotifer assays Acta Biologica Hungarica 2017; 68 (4) accepted V. Kiss T; Cank K; Orbán-Gyapai O; Liktor-Busa E; Rutkovska S; Zomborszki Z; Pučka I; Németh A; Csupor D. Phytochemical and pharmacological investigation of Spiraea chamaedryfolia – A contribution to the chemotaxonomy of Spiraea genus BMC Research Notes 2017; submitted TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Comparison of Arctic Plant Communities Across the Landscape and with Experimental Warming in Northern Alaska Jessica L
    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Masters Theses Graduate Research and Creative Practice 12-2014 Structural Comparison of Arctic Plant Communities Across the Landscape and with Experimental Warming in Northern Alaska Jessica L. Gregory Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Gregory, Jessica L., "Structural Comparison of Arctic Plant Communities Across the Landscape and with Experimental Warming in Northern Alaska" (2014). Masters Theses. 746. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses/746 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research and Creative Practice at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Structural comparison of arctic plant communities across the landscape and with experimental warming in Northern Alaska. Jessica Lynn Gregory A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Biology December, 2014 DEDICATION Dedicated to my husband Adam, Without whose constant love and encouragement this project would never have been accomplished. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first thank the members of my Graduate Committee for their continued support and guidance: Drs. Robert D. Hollister, James Dunn, and Heather Rueth. I would also like to thank Grand Valley State University (GVSU) for its support, as well as Dr. Melvin Northup and Diane Laughlin for laboratory assistance and procedural planning. I would like to extend thanks to Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Aconitum in Slovakia: a Phenetic Approach
    ISSN 2226-3063 e-ISSN 2227-9555 Modern Phytomorphology 11: 51–89, 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.834040 RESEARCH ARTICLE Genus Aconitum in Slovakia: a phenetic approach Andriy Novikov * State Natural History Museum NAS of Ukraine, Teatralna str. 18, 79008 Lviv, Ukraine; [email protected] * Andriy Novikov formerly known as Andrew Novikoff starting from 2017 changed spelling variant of his name in accordance to legislation limitations Received: 23.04.2017 | Accepted: 28.06.2017 | Published: 23.07.2017 Abstract Comprehensive investigation on herbarium material was realized and taxonomical structure of the genus Aconitum in Slovakia has been ascertained on the base of phenetic analysis. Three new taxa (i.e. A. degenii subsp. degenii, A. moldavicum subsp. hosteanum, and A. moldavicum nothosubsp. confusum stat. nov.) were rediscovered for this region, and for one of them the new status was proposed. Morphological variation of A. anthora and its subdivision onto infraspecific taxa (subsp. anthora and subsp. jacquinii) are discussed. The new key for identification and maps of distribution are represented. Keywords: Aconitum, Slovakia, morphology, phenetics, distribution, taxonomy Introduction different morphological traits of monkshoods were considered for genus taxonomy by In spite of long history of investigation, different authors, and therefore very often taxonomy of the genus Aconitum L. is still taxonomic ranges vary significantly for the much discussed and remains unresolved. Many same taxonomic units (Götz 1967; Kmeťová taxonomic problems arise from the notorious 1982; Skalický 1990; Kadota 1987; Voroshilov hybridity within the genus and subsequent 1990; Tamura 1995; Tzvelev 2001). Recent origin of number of putative hybridogenic revisions based on morpho-geographical taxa, which form a morphological continuum concept of species (Davis & Haywood 1963) between the parental taxa (Kadota 1987; and concept of infraspecific differentiation Starmühler 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Species Lists from Npspecies As of September 30, 2001 for Denali National Park and Preserve
    Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Species Lists From NPSpecies as of September 30, 2001 For Denali National Park and Preserve A Supplemental Report to the Final Report – Compilation of Existing Species Data In Alaska’s National Parks By Julia Lenz, Tracey Gotthardt, Mike Kelly, and Robert Lipkin Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage For National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Alaska Region September 30, 2001 In Partial Completion of Cooperative Agreement #9910-00-013 University of Alaska Anchorage Environment and Natural Resources Institute 707 A St. Anchorage, Alaska 9950 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES LIST ........................................................................ 2 FISH SPECIES LIST ................................................................................................ 63 BIRD SPECIES LIST................................................................................................ 64 MAMMAL SPECIES LIST ...................................................................................... 72 AMPHIBIAN SPECIES LIST................................................................................... 75 i INTRODUCTION This report contains species lists for vascular plant and vertebrate species entered in the National Park Service’s NPSpecies database, by the Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP) for Denali
    [Show full text]