DOCSLIB.ORG

HSR Full Report 10 6 2004.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HSR Full Report 10 6 2004.Pdf THE VAN HORNE INSTITUTE CALGARY-EDMONTON HIGH SPEED RAIL PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ______________________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Van Horne Institute gratefully acknowledges the financial support received from the Province of Alberta, Transport Canada and Western Economic Diversification, as well as contributions of in- kind technical services from: C Alberta Ministry of Economic Development, C Alberta Ministry of Transportation, C Bombardier Transportation, C Canac Inc., C Canadian Pacific Railway, C SNC Lavalin, and, C VIA Rail Canada. It should be emphasized that all participants contributing in-kind services have done so on the clear understanding that this will not result in sole or preferred procurement of goods and services in the event the project proceeds to implementation. However, nor does this involvement exclude their consideration in future procurement of goods and services. The Van Horne Institute would also like to acknowledge the work and contributions of the following individuals: Van Horne Institute: Art Smith, Chairman Emeritus Bob Brawn, Chariman Peter Wallis, President & CEO Sarah Bolton, Programs Manager Nancy Stirling, Former Programs Manager Alain Verbeke, McCaig Chair in Management, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary. Teresa Watts, President, Shirocca Consulting/ Project Manager, Calgary-Edmonton HSR Pre-Feasibility Study. Alberta Economic Development: Justin Riemer, Executive Director, Alberta Economic Development Jim Hamblin, Director, International Logistics Rick Sloan, Assistant Deputy Minister, Industry & Regional Development Alberta Innovation & Science: Barry Mehr, Deputy Minister Ray Bassett, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Transportation: Rod Thompson, Executive Director Peter Kilburn, Forecasting Engineer Bombardier Transportation: Lecia Stewart, Vice-President High Speed Rail, North America J. Donald Hunt, Director, Marketing & Sales Canada Eric Panet-Raymond, Director, Marketing & Product Planning Julian Haber, Senior Analyst, Marketing & Product Planning ______________________________________________________________________________________ SHIROCCA CONSULTING i October 2004 THE VAN HORNE INSTITUTE CALGARY-EDMONTON HIGH SPEED RAIL PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ______________________________________________________________________________________ Marcos Tarnowski, Market Analyst, Marketing & Product Planning Canac Inc: Dennis Letourneau, P.Eng., Senior Project Engineer Don Fraser, Senior Engineering Designer Canadian Pacific Railway: Doug Welsh, Executive Director, Strategic Development Deepak Ekbote, Director Cost Research & Analysis SNC Lavalin Inc: Dale Christensen, Senior Vice-President, and General Manager, Chemicals, Petroleum & Industrial Business Unit Doug Macdonald, P. Eng., Manager, Studies & Developmental Projects SNC-Lavalin Capital Inc: Esther Tse, Vice-President, Project Financing Transport Canada: Denis Courtemanche, Economic Analyst VIA Rail: Christena Keon-Sirsly, Chief Strategy Officer Gerry Kolaitis, Director, Strategic Planning Andre Gravelle, Senior Director Civil Engineering John Udell, Director Marketing, Planning & Services Klaus Heckersbruch, Project Director, Financial Support, Corporate Planning & Financial Support Stewart Penketh, Project Director, Costing & Rail Contracts Constantin Geropapas, Director Contracts Administration & Business Development Giovanni Labbiento, Senior Financial Analyst, Corporate Financial Planning & Control Western Economic Diversification: Doug Chambers, Senior Business Officer Consultants: Ipsos-Reid - Kyle Braid, Vice-President & Gillian Grantham, Senior Research Officer Anthony Steadman and Associates - Anthony Steadman Clifton ND Lea Consulting - Dan Meidl, P.Eng., Colledge Transportation Consulting - David Colledge, President Economic Development Research Group - Teresa Lynch, Economic Consultant DRE Transportation Solutions Inc. - Rick Evans, President ______________________________________________________________________________________ SHIROCCA CONSULTING ii October 2004 THE VAN HORNE INSTITUTE CALGARY-EDMONTON HIGH SPEED RAIL PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ______________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Initiation of This Study .................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Purpose and Objectives........................................................................................ 2 1.4 Study Approach .............................................................................................................. 3 2 CONTEXT FOR HIGH SPEED RAIL ................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Calgary-Edmonton Corridor Profile................................................................................. 4 2.2 Challenges for the Future ............................................................................................... 5 3 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW .............................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Overview of Technologies Available............................................................................... 7 3.3 Review of Rail Technology Options................................................................................ 8 3.4 Technology Comparison and Selection ........................................................................ 20 4 ALIGNMENT OPTIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS..................................................... 22 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 22 4.2 CPR Alignment ............................................................................................................. 24 4.2.1 Current Conditions ................................................................................................... 24 4.2.2 Design Standards..................................................................................................... 26 4.2.3 Revised Alignment ................................................................................................... 27 4.2.4 Infrastructure Requirements..................................................................................... 29 4.3 Greenfield Alignment .................................................................................................... 34 4.3.1 Alignment Review and Selection.............................................................................. 35 4.3.2 Design Standards..................................................................................................... 37 4.3.3 Infrastructure Requirements..................................................................................... 37 5 STATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES.................................................................................. 41 5.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 41 5.2 Stations......................................................................................................................... 41 5.2.1 Facility Requirements............................................................................................... 42 5.2.2 Land Requirements.................................................................................................. 43 5.3 Maintenance Facilities .................................................................................................. 44 5.3.1 Facility and Land Requirements............................................................................... 45 6 CAPITAL COSTS ...................................................................................................................... 46 6.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 46 6.2 Breakdown of Capital Costs.......................................................................................... 46 6.3 Projected Cash Flow..................................................................................................... 53 6.4 Exclusions from Capital Cost Estimates ....................................................................... 53 6.5 Overall Cost Review and Comparison .......................................................................... 54 6.6 Opportunities to Reduce Cost and Project Risks.......................................................... 55 7 RIDERSHIP AND REVENUE FORECASTS...................................................................................... 56 7.1 Background and Methodology ...................................................................................... 56 7.2 Existing Transportation Options.................................................................................... 57 7.3 Characteristics of Current Travel .................................................................................. 58 7.3.1 Current
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sopkin to Lead '49 Drive; UJA Caravan Train Here
    ----- ·empl e Bt: th- EL. Broad & Gl cnh~m St$. Only An51lo-Jewi1h Serving 30,000 Newspaper in This State in Rhode Island VOL. XXXIV, NO. 5 FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 1949 PROVIDENCE. R. I . TWENTY-FOUR PAGES 7 CENTS THE COPY Sopkin to Lead '49 Drive; UJA Caravan Train Here Li'I Abner Creator, Miss America Here Sun. Speakers ·Stress Capacity Crowd Need of U. S. Aid Attends Rally The a ppointment of Alvin A. j know that you will not refuse. Sopkin as chairman of the 1949 ; ' "We have it within our power fund-ra ising campa ign of the I to make "Homecoming-1949" the General J ewish Committee of realization of our dreams and Providence was announced Tues­ hopes of the past decade." day during the visit of the "Cara- I Economy In Danger van of Hope" train to this city. The need of United States aid This will m ark the fifth straight i to Israel and the DP's was the year that Sopkin has headed the keynote of the addresses delivered GJC's annual drive, which will by the speakers at Tuesday even­ start on Labor Day. ing's rally. Max Lerner, noted In his acceptance address, made columnist , author and lecturer, Tuesd ay evening at the Rhode told the packed throng that the Island School of Design auditor­ DP camps of Europe must be ium, where the "Caravan of Hope" e m p t i e d this year. Terming program was held before a capa­ Europe a cemetery, Lerner asserted city audience, Sopkin urged all , that if we fail to get the DP's contributors to the 1948 campaign f out of the camps, "their blood to pay their pledges at once, in I ALVIN A.
    [Show full text]
  • La Nouvelle Porte D'entrée De Montréal
    La nouvelle porte d’entrée de Montréal rapport annuel 2004 hall des douanes canadiennes Profil 1 Message de la direction 2 2004 en bref 6 Revue des activités 8 Nos employés 16 Cohabitation avec le milieu 18 Analyse par la direction de la situation financière 20 Rapport de la direction 24 Rapport des vérificateurs 24 États financiers consolidés 25 Notes complémentaires 28 Gouvernance 41 Plan stratégique de cinq ans 45 Transparence 46 Lignes directrices en matière de régie d’entreprise 47 Services 52 Sources de revenus 5 en millions $ % 4 1 1 Activités aéronautiques 64,4 27 2 Activités commerciales 77,2 32 3 3 Frais d’améliorations aéroportuaires 65,9 28 4 Récupération des coûts de sûreté 14,6 6 2 5 Autres produits 17,5 7 Types de dépenses 7 en millions $ % 1 Salaires et charges sociales 40,8 16 6 1 2 Autres frais d’exploitation 61,7 25 3 Paiements versés en remplacement d’impôts aux municipalités 24,0 10 4 Loyer à Transports Canada 19,5 8 5 2 5 Amortissement 61,0 24 4 3 6 Intérêts sur les obligations à long terme 40,1 16 7 Quote-part des résultats des placements à la valeur de consolidation 2,9 1 Développement immobilier : Développement industriel : ADM Montréal-Mirabel (en mètres carrés) Superficie louée Investissements Emplois créés (en mètres carrés) générés 3 (en millions de dollars) 2 3 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Terrains> 162 136 1 2004> 64 287 1 2004> 11,5 1 2004> 205 2 Espaces> 7 044 2 2003> 66 000 2 2003> 40,0 2 2003> 50 3 Concessions> 807 3 2002> 15 000 3 2002> 7,0 3 2002> 40 Trafic passagers Volume de fret Mouvements (en tonnes) d’aéronefs
    [Show full text]
  • A Century O F Campus Maps
    a century North Saskatchewan o f River Saskatchewan Drive 1 8 Tuck Shop Tree Edinboro Road 9 7 > Centre City to campusV 6 Saskatchewan Drive P 5 11 P maps 3 12 E 116 St 117 St P 25 32 35 13 21 Sheldon’s 92 Ave Plaque 34 37 26 30 33 22 48 36 23 Windsor 55 P 52 Park MAIN 40 42 51 54 44 49 QUAD P Fahlman’s Saskatchewan Drive 53 Tree 91 Ave Lot 700 NN 71 62 63 Garneau’s 45 50 69 Tree CEB 73 90 Ave Mural P Alumni Walk 65 72 66 64 67 East Campus P 74 75 NU 89 61 Stadium Universiade P East Flame Tower UNIVERSITY former Varsity 89 Ave 89 Ave P Celebration RESTRICTED ACCESS STATION Tuck Shop site Stadium Plaza 83 90 South 80 84 87 P 91 94 East Campus 88 82 St. Stephens West & North East88 97 By Ellen Schoeck Mural 110 St P P 95 98 86 89 92 Varsity Physical P P Maps and Design by Dennis Weber, Creative Services Education Z 93 PhysEdE A P East 85 East Campus 87 81 111 St 117 St 116 St 87 Ave 87 Ave 87 Ave 160 132 102 100 M 130 135 112 St P 114 St 133 101 P P 131 103 134 86 Ave 106 P P C R 165 P 104 105 Jubilee Garneau 85 Ave 140 85 P 143 T 117 112 111 HEALTH P SCIENCES K 116 STATION 144 84 Ave 113 142 141 P Clinical EDC Sciences J East P 84 115 J 152 P 170 114 83 Ave 112 P 83 Ave 151 P P 150 122 172 174 112 St L 111 St 121 114 St 82 (Whyte) Ave > to Campus Saint Jean 123 156 120 P 117 St 155 110 St University Ave L 111 St University Ave 81 Ave McKernan 115a St 80 Ave Braithwaite 80 Ave Belgravia 115 St University Ave Park < to South Campus a century o f campus maps By Ellen Schoeck Maps and Design by Dennis Weber, Creative Services © Ellen Schoeck (text) and University of Alberta Creative Services (remade historic maps) 2007 No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any forms or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the copyright owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Ortona Final
    ORTONA ARMOURIES 1914 9722–102 STREET RANGE 24 TOWNSHIP 52 WEST OF THE 4TH MERIDIAN LOTS 13‐14 BLOCK 2 PLAN 6417 AS MUNICIPAL HISTORIC RESOURCE 31 AUGUST 2004 CHARACTER‐DEFINING ELEMENTS The character‐defining elements as expressed in the form, massing, materials and style of the principal facades such as: the eight brick pilasters that divide the front façade into seven bays; the brick detailing such as the brick dental course above the sandstone lintels on the upper floors, the round brick arches and flat arches over window openings, the brick band cornice at the parapet level; the stone details such as the lintels and sills; the hoist penthouse covered in pressed metal siding located on the south rooftop; the recessed windows in the front façade; the stone capped parapet; the three carved sandstone cartouches above the entrance bay, the centre bay and the northern bay; the pattern of recessed alternating double and triple windows on the front façade. [Alberta Register of Historic Places, Statement of Significance] Introduction The Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) built its large warehouse and brick stable for its delivery horses on Ross’ Flats in 1914. Building Permit #716 was applied for by the HBC on Tuesday, 2 June 1914, for a “stable” to be constructed on Lots 13‐14 Block 2 Hudson’s Bay Reserve (HBR), on 102 Street. The architect was listed as the 1 “owners.” Value of the new building was placed at $25,000. 2 3 [Blueprints for the Hudson’s Bay Company Stables and Warehouse] 4 5 6 [Stages of construction the Hudson’s Bay Company Stables and Warehouse, July to August 1914] The Empress of Ireland had just sunk (29 May 1914), with thirteen Edmontonians on board.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study
    The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail Ohio Hub Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM & BUSINESS PLAN July 2007 Prepared for The Ohio Rail Development Commission Indiana Department of Transportation Michigan Department of Transportation New York Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Prepared by: Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. In association with HNTB, Inc. The Ohio & Lake Erie Regional Rail - Ohio Hub Study Technical Memorandum & Business Plan Table of Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................x Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 System Planning and Feasibility Goals and Objectives................................................... 1-3 1.2 Business Planning Objectives.......................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Study Approach and Methodology .................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Railroad Infrastructure Analysis...................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Passenger
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Provincial General Election, in Accordance with Section 4(3) of the Election Act
    Province of Alberta The Report of the Chief Electoral Officer on the 2004 Provincial Enumeration and Monday, November 22, 2004 Provincial General Election of the Twenty-sixth Legislative Assembly Alberta Legislative Assembly Office of the Chief Electoral Officer May 31, 2005 Ms. Janis Tarchuk, MLA Banff-Cochrane Chairman, Standing Committee on Legislative Offices Legislature Building Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2B6 Dear Ms. Tarchuk: I have the privilege to submit to you my report on the 2004 Provincial General Enumeration and the November 22, 2004 Provincial General Election, in accordance with Section 4(3) of the Election Act. An overview of the Senate Nominee Election, held in conjunction with the Provincial General Election, has also been included. Additional detail will be provided in “The Report of the Chief Electoral Officer on the 2004 Senate Nominee Election”. Should you require any additional information or clarification on anything contained in the Report, I would be pleased to respond. Sincerely, O. Brian Fjeldheim Chief Electoral Officer Suite 100, 11510 Kingsway Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5G 2Y5 Ph: 780-427-7191 Fax: 780-422-2900 email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 2004 PROVINCIAL GENERAL ENUMERATION Overview ....................................................................................................... 1 Mapping Activities.......................................................................................... 1 Conduct of the Enumeration.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boston-Montreal High Speed Rail Project
    Boston to Montreal High- Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I Final Report prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 final report Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Planning and Feasibility Study Phase I prepared for Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas with Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Fitzgerald and Halliday HNTB, Inc. KKO and Associates April 2003 Boston to Montreal High-Speed Rail Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... ES-1 E.1 Background and Purpose of the Study ............................................................... ES-1 E.2 Study Overview...................................................................................................... ES-1 E.3 Ridership Analysis................................................................................................. ES-8 E.4 Government and Policy Issues............................................................................. ES-12 E.5 Conclusion..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Commuter Rail Energy Efficiency and Its Comparison with Competing Passenger Transportation Modes
    FACTORS AFFECTING COMMUTER RAIL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ITS COMPARISON WITH COMPETING PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION MODES BY GIOVANNI C. DIDOMENICO THESIS Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Advisers: Professor Christopher P.L. Barkan Senior Research Engineer C. Tyler Dick, P.E. ABSTRACT As concerns about the environmental impacts and sustainability of the transportation sector continue to grow, modal energy efficiency is a factor of increasing importance when evaluating benefits and costs of transportation systems and justifying future investment. Poor assumptions on the efficiency of the system can alter the economics of investment in commuter rail. This creates a need to understand the factors affecting commuter rail energy efficiency and the comparison to competing passenger transportation modes to aid operators and decision makers in the development of new commuter rail lines and the improvement of existing services. This thesis describes analyses to further understand the factors affecting the current energy efficiency of commuter rail systems, how their efficiency may be improved through implementation of various technologies, and how their efficiency compares to competing modes of passenger transportation. After reviewing the literature, it was evident that past studies often conducted energy efficiency analyses and modal comparisons using methods that favored one energy source or competing mode by neglecting losses in the system. Therefore, four methods of energy efficiency analysis were identified and applied to 25 commuter rail systems in the United States using data from the National Transit Database (NTD).
    [Show full text]
  • Design Data on Suspension Systems of Selected Rail Passenger Cars RR 5931R 5021
    Design Data on Suspension U.S. Department Systems of Selected Rail of Transportation Federal Railroad Passenger Cars Administration Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 ~ail Vehicles & lonents NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMS No. 0704-0188 " Public reporting bulden for this collection of infonnation is estimated to average 1 hourper response. including the time for naviewing instructions. sean:hin9 existing data sources. gathering and maintaining the data needed. and completing and naviewing the collection of information. send comments regarding this bulden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information. including suggestions for reducing this bulden. to WashingICn Headquarters services Dinactorata for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway. SUite 1204, Arlington. VA 22202-4302. and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperworlc Reduction Project (07~188). Washington. DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND OATES COVE~EO July 1996 Final Report ~ober1993-December1994 4. TITLE AND SUBnTLE S. FUNDING NUMBERS Design Data on Suspension Systems of Selected Rail Passenger Cars RR 5931R 5021 6. AUTHORS Alan J. Bing. Shaun R. Berry and Hal B. Henderson 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZAnON NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANlZAnON Arthur D.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2018 Unified Workforce Development System Report
    FY 2018 Unified Workforce Development System Report 1 Table of Contents Federal Workforce Policy and Programs | Page 22 Letter from Executive Director | Page 3 RI Job Training Tax Credit | Page 27 Board Information and Summary | Page 4 Strategic Plan | Page5 Summary of Reports Received | Page 28 1 Demand-Driven Investments | Page7 Looking Forward | Page 29 2 Career Pathways | Page14 $ Fiscal Summary – FY 2018 | Page 30 Aligned Planning & Governance | Page19 3 Staff List | Page 31 4 Data and Performance | Page21 Unified Expenditure and Program Report | Page 32 2 Letter from the Executive Director $ Train for Success. Connect for Growth. On behalf of the members and staff of the Governor’s Workforce Board I am pleased to submit our 2018 Annual Report as required by RI General Law § 42-102-6. Fiscal Year 2018 was another impactful year for the Rhode Island workforce development system. The state’s industry-driven workforce development programs have received national recognition for their ability to meet employer demand. Our efforts on building career pathways for youths and adults have engaged more education and community partners in these efforts than ever before. And along the way we have helped place thousands of Rhode Islanders into jobs, prepared hundreds of youth for the demands of the labor market, and assisted hundreds of employers to meet their talent needs. While there was lots of great progress and accomplishment in FY2018, I am especially proud of the successfully launch of the Real Skills for Youth program. The RSFY program builds on the longstanding summer youth employment program that offered summer jobs to youth through local providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperloop, ¿El Transporte Del Futuro? Comparativa Y Análisis Dinámico
    HYPERLOOP, ¿EL TRANSPORTE DEL FUTURO? Jorge Martínez García COMPARATIVA Y 29 de junio de 2020 Tutores: ANÁLISIS DINÁMICO María Dolores Gómez Pulido Roberto Revilla Angulo Trabajo Final de Máster ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Máster Universitario en Ingeniería de Caminos, Canales, y Puertos Hyperloop, ¿el transporte del futuro? Comparativa y análisis dinámico Contenido Índice de Tablas ............................................................................................................................. 4 Índice de Figuras ............................................................................................................................ 5 1 Resumen ................................................................................................................................ 7 2 Agradecimientos .................................................................................................................... 8 3 Introducción .......................................................................................................................... 9 4 Estado del arte ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Sistema de propulsión y suspensión ............................................................................ 12 4.2 Velocidad ..................................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Tamaño del
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Elizabeth Park MASTER Plan Volume 2: Appendices
    QUEEN ELIZABETH PARK MASTER PLAN VOLUME 2: APPENDICES Transforming Edmonton Design Standards | City of Edmonton 2009 012 USING THE IDENTITY To ensure the design retains its integrity and value it is important to consistently follow basic usage principles. any application that is not described here should be avoided. The identity can be produced either in full colour format, in all black, in all white, or in greyscale. Full Colour vErSion The full colour version should be used wherever possible. it must be displayed on a white background, and must be displayed with the requisite amount of white space surrounding it. when a white background is available the full colour version is the default position – unless there is a reason to use one of the other versions, the full colour version should be used. grEySCalE vErSion The greyscale version should be used on documents designed for black and white production. The tone of grey should remain the same in the spears originating on the left side of the identity, and vary in the spears originating on the right side of the identity. Do not use a colour version of the identity printed in black and white – use a greyscale version of the identity. Approved by City Council on August 28, 2013 This plan is available online at www.edmonton.ca Queen Elizabeth Park Master Plan | City of Edmonton 2013 LIST OF APPENDICES A1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY REPORT A2 INTERNAL WORKSHOP #1 DETAILED RESULTS A3 PUBLIC WORKSHOP #1 DETAILED RESULTS A4 PUBLIC ONLINE SURVEY #1 DETAILED RESULTS A5 ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY
    [Show full text]