DOCSLIB.ORG

Constructing the U.S. Rapprochement with China, 1961–1974

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Constructing the U.S. Rapprochement with China, 1961–1974 P1: KcS 0521839866agg.xml CY468B/Goh 0521839866 August 25, 2004 17:12 Constructing the U.S. Rapprochement with China, 1961–1974 From “Red Menace” to “Tacit Ally” EVELYN GOH Nanyang Technological University iii P1: KcS 0521839866agg.xml CY468B/Goh 0521839866 August 25, 2004 17:12 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Evelyn Goh 2005 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2005 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Sabon 10/13 pt. System LATEX 2ε [tb] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Goh, Evelyn. Constructing the U.S. rapprochement with China, 1961–1974 : from “red menace” to “tacit ally” / Evelyn Goh. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-521-83986-6 1. United States – Foreign relations – China. 2. China – Foreign relations – United States. 3. United States – Foreign relations – 1961–1963. 4. United States – Foreign relations – 1963–1969. 5. United States – Foreign relations – 1969–1974. i. Title. e183.8.c5g625 2004 327.7305109046–dc22 2004045808 isbn 0 521 83986 6 hardback iv P1: KcS 0521839866agg.xml CY468B/Goh 0521839866 August 25, 2004 17:12 Contents Foreword by Rosemary Foot page ix Acknowledgments xi List of Abbreviations xiii 1 Introduction 1 part i. competing discourses, 1961–1968 2 “Red Menace” to “Revolutionary Rival”: Recasting the Chinese Communist Threat 17 The “Red Menace”: Communist China as Expansionist Military Aggressor 20 “Revolutionary Rival”: Communist China as Independent Militant Challenger 30 3 “Troubled Modernizer” to “Resurgent Power”: Revisionist Images of the PRC and Arguments for a New China Policy 46 “Troubled Modernizer”: China as an Underdeveloped Country 47 “Resurgent Power”: China as Frustrated Reemerging Major State 61 4 The Revisionist Legacy: The Discourse of Reconciliation with China by 1968 82 Competing Discourses 84 The Discourse of Reconciliation with China, 1968 92 part ii. discursive transitions, 1969–1971 5 Nixon’s China Policy Discourse in Context 101 “Tough Coexistence”: Nixon’s China Policy Thinking as Vice President, 1952–1960 102 v P1: KcS 0521839866agg.xml CY468B/Goh 0521839866 August 25, 2004 17:12 vi Contents China as “Key Player”: The Development of Nixon’s China Strategy, 1960–1968 106 President Nixon’s China Policy Discourse, 1969–1971 112 Nixon’s Discourse of Reconciliation in Context 121 6 Debating the Rapprochement: “Resurgent Revolutionary Power” versus “Threatened Major Power” 124 New Opportunities and Old Doubts at the Beginning of the Nixon Administration 125 “Revolutionary Resurgent Power”: The State Department Rethinks China Policy 128 “Threatened Major Power”: The White House Reconceptualizes China 136 Debates and Departures: The Renewed Warsaw Talks, 1970 142 Conclusion 147 part iii. discourses of rapprochement in practice, 1971–1974 7 “Principled” Realist Power: Laying the Discursive Foundations of a New Relationship, July 1971 to February 1972 153 Kissinger’s New Representation of the Chinese 155 New Identity, New Interests: Articulating the Common Ground for a New Relationship 164 Conclusion: Discursive Foundations 182 8 Principles in Practice: Policy Implications of the U.S. Decision for Rapprochement 184 Test of Friendship: The 1971 South Asian Crisis 185 Negotiating Principles, Postponing Resolution: U.S. Policy toward Taiwan 192 Discursive Reconstructions and Policy Outcomes 204 9 “Selling” the Rapprochement: The Nixon Administration’s Justification of the New China Policy 206 “Realist Resurgent Power”: Explaining the Former Enemy 207 China as “the Enemy of My Enemy”: Realpolitik for the Right 215 Conclusion 220 10 “Tacit Ally,” June 1972 to 1974: Consolidating or Saving the U.S.–China Rapprochement 222 Triangular Politics, June 1972 to February 1973: Former Enemy to Tacit Ally? 223 Maintaining Momentum in U.S.–PRC Relations, July–November 1973 236 Stalemate: U.S.–PRC Relations in 1974 247 Conclusion: Triangular Balance of Power to Tacit Alliance 252 P1: KcS 0521839866agg.xml CY468B/Goh 0521839866 August 25, 2004 17:12 Contents vii 11 Conclusion 256 Bibliography 269 Dramatis Personae 285 Index 295 P1: JTR/JZW 0521839866c01.xml CY468B/Goh 0521839866 August 4, 2004 15:44 1 Introduction Discourses of Reconciliation Your handshake came over the vastest ocean in the world – twenty-five years of no communication. Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai to President Richard Nixon, Beijing, 21 February 1972 It was the week that changed the world. Nixon, Shanghai, 27 February 1972 President Richard Nixon’s historic visit to the People’s Republic of China in February 1972 marked a Sino-American rapprochement and the be- ginning of the route to normalization of relations. This came more than twenty years after mainland China was “lost” to the communists and, less than a year later in 1950, attacked American-led United Nations forces in Korea. Thereafter, a key tenet of U.S. Cold War strategy was to “contain” Communist China by means of bilateral alliances and military bases in East Asia, and to isolate it by severing trade, travel, and diplomatic con- tacts and refusing to recognize the communist regime. The next twenty years were characterized by American opposition to UN membership for mainland China, three crises in the Taiwan Straits, offensive rhetoric, threats of nuclear attack, and the fighting of a proxy war in Vietnam. In ending this hostile estrangement in 1972, Nixon thus executed a dra- matic reversal of U.S. China policy. The U.S.–China rapprochement was the most significant strategic shift of the Cold War prior to 1989, more so than the Sino-Soviet split. As Nixon and his National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger claimed, the rapprochement “changed the world” by transforming a Cold War international system made up of two opposing 1 P1: JTR/JZW 0521839866c01.xml CY468B/Goh 0521839866 August 4, 2004 15:44 2 Introduction ideological blocs into a tripolar one in which great-power foreign policy was conducted on the basis of “national interest” and power balancing. This reversal of policy, while dramatic, is not generally considered dif- ficult to explain.1 The U.S.–China rapprochement is understood as the re- sult of the operation of the realist logic of balance-of-power.2 Washington and Beijing were brought together by a shifting balance of power, which saw the former’s military superiority reduced in relation to Moscow, and the latter no longer an ally but a significantly weaker adversary facing a possible war with the Soviet Union. The Sino-Soviet relationship was characterized from the start by ide- ological tension, which developed as the two states competed for leader- ship in the international communist movement.3 This conflict was evident not only in the fierce disagreements about issues such as the communist revolutionary struggle and relations with the United States, but also in Moscow’s declining support for its ally.4 By the late 1960s, the conflict had developed military dimensions, with troop build-ups on the Sino- Soviet border. The Chinese decision for rapprochement with the United States was motivated by two sets of reasons. First, at the national security level, Beijing needed the U.S. opening to deter a Soviet attack. China’s strategic position in relation to its militarily superior neighbor worsened 1 The best accounts of the rapprochement are found in Harry Harding, A Fragile Relationship: The United States and China since 1972 (Washington, DC, 1992), pp. 35–40; Robert Ross, Negotiating Cooperation: The United States and China, 1969–1989 (Stanford, 1995), pp. 1–54; John Garver, China’s Decision for Rapprochement with the United States, 1968– 1971 (Boulder, 1982); and William Bundy, A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency (New York, 1998). A detailed but journalistic account based on new documents and interviews is provided by Patrick Tyler, A Great Wall: Six Presidents and China (New York, 1999), pp. 45–180. For a succinct recent account of the Chinese decision based on new documents, see Chen Jian, Mao’s China and the Cold War (Chapel Hill, 2001), Chapter 9. 2 Realist and neo-realist schools of thought perceive the international system to be anarchi- cal, causing states to be preoccupied with ways to enhance their relative military power in order to secure themselves against threats from other states, including forging alliances to balance against another powerful state. See Hans Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York, 1949); Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Relations (Reading, 1979); and Stephen Walt, The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, 1987). 3 See Steven Goldstein, “Nationalism and Internationalism: Sino-Soviet Relations,” in Thomas Robinson and David Shambaugh, eds., Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice (Oxford, 1994). 4 Moscow’s qualified military support for Beijing had been evident as early as the 1950s, when, anxious to avoid a conflict with the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S.-China Relations: the Search for a New Equilibrium Ryan Hass
    U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS: THE SEARCH FOR A NEW EQUILIBRIUM RYAN HASS FEBRUARY 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY it did not actively seek to change the existing order on a magnitude corresponding to China’s ambitions For over 40 years following President Richard Nixon’s today, nor did it have the capabilities to do so.) Third, first tentative steps in China in 1972, the relationship China’s rise from a low-wage manufacturing hub to between the United States and the People’s Republic a technology power has introduced friction into the of China (PRC) navigated many ups and downs, but economic relationship, as both economies increasingly generally developed along a trajectory of deepening move from being complementary to competitive with social, economic, people-to-people, and diplomatic one another. And fourth, unresolved questions about ties. In recent years, that trajectory has been broken. the nature of ideological or systems competition are Now, the relationship has reached what respected fueling tensions. China scholar David M. Lampton describes as a “tipping point.”1 This paper will explore how the relationship Looking ahead, the paper argues that Washington and reached its current moment, why the relationship has Beijing each will need to take steps to allow conditions been nose-diving, and what steps the United States to emerge over time that would make possible the could take to protect its interests in its relationship emergence of a new equilibrium for the relationship. with China going forward. Such an outcome would bolster each side’s confidence in their ability to protect their own vital interests, This paper argues that neither the United States prevent a mutually harmful deterioration in relations, nor China own a monopoly of responsibility for the and enable both sides to focus more on improving downturn in relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapprochement Between America and China During the Nixon
    Bilge Strateji,Bilge Cilt Strateji, 9, Sayı Cilt16, Bahar9, Sayı 2017, 16, Bahar ss.131-147 2017 Rapprochement between America and China during the Nixon Era: A Product of Timing or the Leadership? Nixon Dönemi Amerika ve Çin Arasındaki Uzlaşma: Zamanın bir Ürünü mü yoksa Liderlik mi? Teslim: 31 Mayıs 2016 Onay: 23 Mart 2017 Ali Onur ÖZÇELİK* Abstract This article explores the rapprochement between America and China in the 1970s. By ending two-decade old antagonism and realizing the most impor- tant strategic shift of the Cold War era, both states have changed the course of the world politics since the middle of the Cold War. In elaborating one of the historical events in American foreign policy, the article seeks to find an answer for one big question: Was Nixon a unique leader to initiate the U.S. opening to China or was it purely a product of timing? The findings suggest that although timing provided important motivation for rapprochement, this had not been possible if Nixon did not show his determination. Keywords: : Rapprochement between America and China, Leadership, Re- alpolitik, American Foreign Policy. Öz Bu makale, Amerika ve Çin arasında 1970’lerdeki uzlaşmayı incelemekte- dir. Yirmi yıllık düşmanlığı sonlandıran ve Soğuk Savaş’ın en önemli strate- jik kayışını gerçekleştiren iki devlet, Soğuk Savaş’ın ortasından itibaren dünya politikasının gidişatını değiştirmiştir. Amerikan dış politikasındaki en önemli tarihi olaylardan bir tanesini ele alan bu makele, büyük bir so- ruya: Amerikanın Çin’e açılması için Nixon eşsiz bir lider miydi yoksa bu süreç tamamen zamanın bir ürünü müydü? cevap aramaktadır. Bulgular, za- manlama uzlaşma için önemli bir motivasyon sağlamasına rağmen, Nixon’ın kararlılığı olmasa bu uzlaşmanın imkansız olduğunu önermektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape
    China's Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape │ 3 China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the global trade, investment and finance landscape China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) development strategy aims to build connectivity and co-operation across six main economic corridors encompassing China and: Mongolia and Russia; Eurasian countries; Central and West Asia; Pakistan; other countries of the Indian sub-continent; and Indochina. Asia needs USD 26 trillion in infrastructure investment to 2030 (Asian Development Bank, 2017), and China can certainly help to provide some of this. Its investments, by building infrastructure, have positive impacts on countries involved. Mutual benefit is a feature of the BRI which will also help to develop markets for China’s products in the long term and to alleviate industrial excess capacity in the short term. The BRI prioritises hardware (infrastructure) and funding first. This report explores and quantifies parts of the BRI strategy, the impact on other BRI-participating economies and some of the implications for OECD countries. It reproduces Chapter 2 from the 2018 edition of the OECD Business and Financial Outlook. 1. Introduction The world has a large infrastructure gap constraining trade, openness and future prosperity. Multilateral development banks (MDBs) are working hard to help close this gap. Most recently China has commenced a major global effort to bolster this trend, a plan known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). China and economies that have signed co-operation agreements with China on the BRI (henceforth BRI-participating economies1) have been rising as a share of the world economy.
    [Show full text]
  • "Ostpolitik As a Source of Intra-Bloc Tensions" by Dr
    1 "Ostpolitik as a source of intra-bloc tensions" by Dr. Oliver Bange, Mannheim University (Project "Ostpolitik and Détente") [Ostpolitik caused friction on a number of different levels – it sparked tensions within Willy Brand’s party, the SPD, parliament, the coalition cabinet, tensions with the Western allies, and even within the Eastern bloc. It is the latter two that this paper is devoted, arranging documents from various national archives around nine distinct but interconnected arguments. Inevitably, such a vue d’ensemble has to start with an explanation of the goals and tactics underlying the new Eastern policy as devised during Brandt’s time as foreign minister of the “Grand Coalition” from December 1966 to September 1969, and put into practice during his chancellorship of the social-liberal coalition until 1974 and then onwards to the CSCE in Helsinki on August 1, 1975.] One might compare the "Neue Ostpolitik" of Willy Brandt and Egon Bahr with a coin: the currency, or ultimate goal, imprinted on it is called "unification" – in order to avoid any compromise to the original borders of the vanished Reich, Brandt refused to speak about "re- unification", preferring the "unification" or "Zusammenwachsen" (growing closer) of the two existing German states. The two sides of the coin represent two long-term strategies to achieve unification. Undermining Communism by exposing the people under its rule to Western values and liberties was one side of the coin. However, the eventual breakdown of Communism itself would not guarantee German unification. The other side of the coin was therefore to devise an all-European security system, taking care of the legitimate security concerns of all nations (including the United States and the Soviet Union) concerned by a prospective unification of the two German states.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiang Kai-Shek Introduction General Overviews Primary Sources
    Chiang Kai-Shek Introduction General Overviews Primary Sources Archives Collected Works and Books Other Primary Sources Collections of Visual Sources Journals Historiographical Overviews Biographies Upbringing and Early Career Rise to Power and the “Chinese Revolution” Nanjing Decade Relationship with Japan Second Sino-Japanese War Civil War and “Loss” of the Mainland Chiang Kai-shek on Taiwan Cold War Personality Cult, Commemoration, and Legacy Introduction Chiang Kai-shek (Jiang Jieshi 蔣介石)—also referred to as Chiang Chung-cheng (Jiang Zhongzheng 蔣 中正)—is one of the most controversial figures in modern Chinese history. He is also one of the most studied. He has been the focus of a vast array of historiography, biography, hagiography, and demonization. For early critics, Chiang was seen, from his purging of the Communists in 1927, as a “betrayer” of the Chinese Revolution. This assessment is now a point of considerable contention among historians. His creation of a unified yet authoritarian Chinese state during the Nanjing Decade (1927–1937) is also a prominent focus of scholarship, as is his role as China’s leader during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945). Earlier assessments often ended their study of Chiang with his defeat by the communists in the Chinese Civil War and his subsequent flight to Taiwan in 1949. However, more recent scholarship has explored both the controversies and achievements of the quarter of a century that Chiang spent on Taiwan, and his legacy on that island in the period since 1975. There remain major differences in approaches to the study of Chiang along political, methodological, and national lines, but the deposition of Chiang’s diaries at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, in 2004 has ensured that a steady flow of scholarly reassessments has been published since then.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Report to Congress on China's WTO Compliance
    2020 Report to Congress On China’s WTO Compliance United States Trade Representative January 2021 2020 Report to Congress On China’s WTO Compliance United States Trade Representative January 2021 2020 USTR Report to Congress on China’s WTO Compliance TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ……………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………………….. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………… 2 U.S. ASSESSMENT OF CHINA’S WTO MEMBERSHIP ……………………………………………………..……. 4 China’s WTO Accession ……………………………………………………………………………..…………….…..………………… 4 Expectations of WTO Membership ……….……………………………………………………………………..…………………… 5 China’s Record in Terms of Complying With WTO Rules ………………………………..…………….…..………………… 6 China’s Record in Terms of Transitioning to a Market Economy …………..…….……………….……………..……… 8 U.S. STRATEGY FOR ADDRESSING TRADE DISTORTIONS CAUSED BY CHINA …………… 13 REVIEW OF TRADE MECHANISMS USED TO ENGAGE CHINA .……...……………………………… 21 Bilateral Dialogues ……………….………………………………………………………………….………………………………..………… 21 Multilateral Fora ……………….……………………………………………………………….………….……………………………..……… 22 Enforcement ………………………….…………………………………………………………..….……………………………………………… 24 U.S. Laws ……………….………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………..……… 24 WTO Litigation ………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………..……… 24 KEY U.S. CONCERNS ………….……………………..………………….…………………………………………………………..…… 27 Non-tariff Measures …….……….……………………………………………………………….………………………………..….……… 27 Industrial Plans …………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………….……. 27 State-Owned Enterprises ……………………………..……………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Between the United States and China: How Does Hedging Work? Park Jin 60 | Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies
    59 Korea Between the United States and China: How Does Hedging Work? Park Jin 60 | Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies “We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies.” The words of the 19th- century British statesman Lord Palmerstone seem to resonate in 21st-century Asia. For example, China and the United States fought against each other during the Korean War, but now the two great powers are exploring a new style of constructive strategic partnership. Japan and Vietnam fought against the United States in the last century, but they too are now strong allies and major strategic partners of the United States. In this fast-changing region of explosive economic growth and constant power shifts, even the most traditional alliances are being tested while previously unlikely partnerships are being forged. Amid deepening uncertainty and ambiguity, states continue to struggle to answer that fundamental question of foreign policy: friend or foe? The same question was much easier to answer during the Cold War period; the world was divided into two blocs, and small and middle powers only had to choose between them. My friend’s friend was a friend, and my enemy’s friend was an enemy. After the bipolar world turned into a unipolar hegemony whether you chose to be a friend or a foe to the United States, the choice was still a binary one.1 Such reassuring simplicity has been fading away rapidly. With the projected rise of a new superpower in China and the perceived challenges to the U.S.-centric hub-and- spokes system in an age where economic interdependence has increased and power shift has occurred, especially in Asia, it requires a sophisticated diplomacy to adapt to the perceived shifts in geopolitical landscape and to optimize a policy mix for managing alliances and new partnerships.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea, Preview Chapter 2
    2 Perils of Refugee Life As we argued in the introduction, our interest in the North Korean refu- gees is twofold: We are concerned about their material and psychological well-being—their experiences as refugees—as well as interested in the insights they might provide with respect to life in North Korea itself. This chapter takes up the fi rst question, drawing primarily on the results of the China survey of 2004–05. We fi rst consider the reasons why refugees left North Korea and their living conditions in China. Despite the precariousness of their status and their preference for a decent life in North Korea, few plan on returning. Most envision themselves as temporarily residing in China before moving on to a third country. Yet there is evidence of considerable movement back and forth across the border, mostly people carrying money and food back to their extended family members in North Korea. The refugee community in China is exposed to multiple sources of vulnerability, including not only fear of arrest but also the uncertainty of their work circumstances. We highlight the particular vulnerability of women to forms of abuse such as traffi cking, which has recently received increasing attention (Hawk 2003, K. Lee 2006, Sheridan 2006, Committee for Human Rights in North Korea 2009, National Human Rights Commis- sion of Korea 2010). In the third section we extend this analysis of objective conditions to a consideration of the psychology of the refugees. A key fi nding, confi rmed by more detailed clinical work in South Korea (Jeon 2000, Y.
    [Show full text]
  • The Awakening of the Sleeping Giant: How Sino-American Rapprochement Triggered China's Meteoric Rise and What It Means Today
    The Awakening of the Sleeping Giant: How Sino-American Rapprochement Triggered China’s Meteoric Rise and What It Means Today Bobby Aiyer Junior Division Individual Documentary Process Paper Words: 500 Process Paper Selection For this year’s NHD, I chose a topic that I strongly connected with. Having lived in both China and the United States for extended periods of time, I chose to focus on the foundations of the Sino-American relationship. I wanted to place an emphasis on the Shanghai Communiqué and what that meant for the Sino-American relationship. However, after in-depth research, I realized that the Shanghai Communiqué was just the beginning of a series of exchanges, called rapprochement. I decided to widen the spectrum of my topic, explain the history behind normalization, and analyze the present-day impact of Nixon’s encounters. Research After finalizing my topic, I read Henry Kissinger’s book “On China” and learned about the details and motivations that led both the U.S. and China to re-establish relations. Then, I used history websites to understand the economic and political scenarios for both during the late 1960s, researched today’s Sino-American relationship, drew conclusions, and created a cause- and-effect timeline. After the State competition, I worked to address the negative aspects of the Sino-American relationship, balancing my documentary. I also contacted numerous experts specializing in the present-day status of Sino-American relations, including Prof. David Lampton of Johns Hopkins University. I conducted a vital interview with him that centered on the “today” of Sino-American encounters and exchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Anglo-Saxonism and American Involvement in the First World War
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Yanks are Coming Over There: The Role of Anglo-Saxonism and American Involvement in the First World War A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Dino Ejercito Buenviaje August 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Brian Lloyd, Chairperson Dr. Roger Ransom Dr. Thomas Cogswell Copyright by Dino Ejercito Buenviaje 2014 The Dissertation of Dino Ejercito Buenviaje is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is truly a humbling experience when I consider the people and institutions that have contributed to this work. First of all, I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Brian Lloyd, for his patience and mentorship in helping me to analyze the role of Anglo- Saxonism throughout American history and for making me keep sight of my purpose. I am also grateful to my other committee members such as Dr. Roger Ransom, for his support early in my graduate program, and Dr. Thomas Cogswell, for his support at a crucial point in my doctorate program. I also would like to thank Dr. Kenneth Barkin for his suggestion that I add a German-American chapter to my dissertation to make my study of American society during the First World War more well-rounded. I also would like to thank the staff at the history department for helping me navigate throughout the various stages of my program. I am especially grateful to the University of California, Riverside for all the material and financial support it has provided me throughout my graduate education, such as the use of the Tomás Rivera Library, the Dean’s Fellowship, the Dissertation Year Fellowship, as well as valuable teaching experience through teaching assistantships.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian Perspective on the Belt and Road Initiative CHAPTER 1
    CHAPTER 1 Cambodian Perspective on the Belt and Road Initiative Vannarith Chheang and Heng Pheakdey Introduction China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which consists of the Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative, is an international cooperation platform that significantly shapes domestic development as well as the foreign policies of President Xi Jinping.1 The BRI is the key vehicle for China to exert economic statecraft and expand its economic and political presence in the Eurasian continent and the Indo-Pacific. Southeast Asian countries have responded to the BRI to varying degrees. Some have embraced the initiative, while some have expressed support with caution. Some countries are concerned that the power asymmetries coupled with excessive economic dependence on China might limit their foreign policy options and strategic maneuverability.2 As will be shown below, Cambodia is one of the countries in Southeast Asia (SEA) most supportive of the BRI, mainly for economic reasons, especially the potential boost that the BRI may give to its infrastructure development.3 In addition, the warm political relations between Cambodia and China also lubricate Phnom Penh’s backing for China’s scheme. Cambodia is one of China’s oldest and closest friends in Southeast Asia. Bilateral relations have a long history that can be traced back eight centuries when a Chinese diplomat paid a visit to Angkor City in 1296.4 After decades of relations that fluctuated up and down during the Cold War, contemporary ties between Cambodia and China have reached a new economic and political zenith. China is now Cambodia’s top foreign investor, a major donor, and an increasingly important trading partner.
    [Show full text]
  • Ostpolitik, 1969-1974: the European and Global Response
    Ostpolitik, 1969-1974: The European and Global Response Conference at the Mershon Center for International Security Studies, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. May 12-13, 2006. Co-Sponsored by the Mershon Center and the German Historical Institute Washington. Conveners: Carole Fink (OSU) and Bernd Schaefer (GHI). Participants: Uta Balbier (Hamburg Institute for Social Research), Alan Beyerchen (OSU), David Curp (Ohio University), Tilman Dedering (University of Pretoria), Andrey Edemskiy (Russian Academy of Sciences), [Alexei Filitov (Russian Academy of Sciences)], Norman Goda (Ohio University), William G. Gray (Purdue University), Amit Das Gupta (Institute of Contemporary History, Berlin), Richard Herrmann (OSU), David Hoffmann (OSU), H. Gerald Hughes (University of Wales), Jacques Hymans (Smith College), Wanda Jarzabek (Polish Academy of Sciences), Milan Kosanovic (University of Bonn), [Sara Lorenzini (University of Trento)], Gottfried Niedhart (University of Mannheim), Meung-Hoan Noh (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul), Chester Pach (Ohio University), [Marie-Pierre Rey (University of Paris-VI)], David Stone (Kansas State University), Oldrich Tuma (Institute of Contemporary History, Prague), Corinna Unger (GHI), Irwin Wall (University of California, Riverside). “Neue Ostpolitik” is usually associated with Willy Brandt and the Federal Republic’s opening toward Central and Eastern Europe. Less well known is Ostpolitik’s profund impact on nations outside Europe. India, China, the two Koreas, South Africa, and Israel were affected to varying degrees by the consequences of Brandt’s Ostpolitik. Simultaneously, Ostpolitik strongly influenced the Western Allies’ politics toward and within Europe, the Conference for Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), China’s position vis-à-vis the West and the Soviet Union, and the policy of non- proliferation associated with détente.
    [Show full text]